正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

GPT-5.5 literally changes the game I've tried making this work with so many other models and never got this far. One prompt in, the physics worked. The animations worked. GPT-image-2 generated the backgrounds. A few lazy follow-ups later, Mochipuff was born.

Chris Tate

63,072 subscribers

136,079 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The new 2026 AI workflow 🤖⚡ GPT Image 2.0 → assets → Codex + GPT-5.5 → playable browser game 🎮 I turned my AI image into a web game. 🖼️ GPT Image 2 created the visual. 🎨 Codex generated the sprites and animations. 🕹️ GPT-5.5 built the prototype.

The new 2026 AI workflow 🤖⚡ GPT Image 2.0 → assets → Codex + GPT-5.5 → playable browser game 🎮 I turned my AI image into a web game. 🖼️ GPT Image 2 created the visual. 🎨 Codex generated the sprites and animations. 🕹️ GPT-5.5 built the prototype.

Givros

942,450 次观看 • 4 个月前

this is the wildest website i've seen so far, all made with ai (gpt-image-2 and seedance-2.0) and it changes on every refresh! unreal work, congrats Pear

this is the wildest website i've seen so far, all made with ai (gpt-image-2 and seedance-2.0) and it changes on every refresh! unreal work, congrats Pear

kyzo

387,504 次观看 • 19 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT Image 2 is insanely good...I generated a 360° equirectangular panorama in Happycapy with just a skill + prompt. Step 1: Select the generate-image skill Step 2: Enter a prompt like: “Use a frontend 360 viewer to display an equirectangular image of […] using the GPT-Image-2 model.” Wanna see how you all get creative with this

GPT Image 2 is insanely good...I generated a 360° equirectangular panorama in Happycapy with just a skill + prompt. Step 1: Select the generate-image skill Step 2: Enter a prompt like: “Use a frontend 360 viewer to display an equirectangular image of […] using the GPT-Image-2 model.” Wanna see how you all get creative with this

Min Zhou

343,574 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

Givros

32,646 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

897,956 次观看 • 1 个月前

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is actually cool - I tried the same prompt for the new Interactive Playwright skill in Codex & GPT-5.4 xHigh - the one above is with the skill and the one below is without. What the skill does is uses the computer use capability of GPT-5.4 to look and navigate the UI. This never worked for me before, but with GPT-5.4 this is the first time I can actually see a massive difference. You can see how the first scene is much more coherent, higher fidelity and complete. The one below is missing a lot of elements and isn't as rich in detail. I'll keep using it for any UI work now.

This is actually cool - I tried the same prompt for the new Interactive Playwright skill in Codex & GPT-5.4 xHigh - the one above is with the skill and the one below is without. What the skill does is uses the computer use capability of GPT-5.4 to look and navigate the UI. This never worked for me before, but with GPT-5.4 this is the first time I can actually see a massive difference. You can see how the first scene is much more coherent, higher fidelity and complete. The one below is missing a lot of elements and isn't as rich in detail. I'll keep using it for any UI work now.

Peter Gostev (SF 24-28 August)

257,389 次观看 • 5 个月前

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

Givros

10,599 次观看 • 1 个月前

Codex is unusable. I generated one image with GPT Image 2.0, gave it to Codex, and used one simple prompt: “Create me a web game from this image.” You give it a simple image like this, and suddenly you realize you can build: • a voxel map • an editor • tile animations • a playable browser prototype This is getting ridiculous.

Codex is unusable. I generated one image with GPT Image 2.0, gave it to Codex, and used one simple prompt: “Create me a web game from this image.” You give it a simple image like this, and suddenly you realize you can build: • a voxel map • an editor • tile animations • a playable browser prototype This is getting ridiculous.

Givros

83,376 次观看 • 3 个月前

“Use the reference image named farm_voxel.png as the main visual guide. Create a playable-looking low-poly voxel agricultural farm diorama" This is the workflow I keep pushing: 1) GPT Image 2.0 for the visual base. 2) Codex with imagegen + GPT-5.5 for the build. 3) Three.js for the prototype. result: 🎬 Prompt below 👇

“Use the reference image named farm_voxel.png as the main visual guide. Create a playable-looking low-poly voxel agricultural farm diorama" This is the workflow I keep pushing: 1) GPT Image 2.0 for the visual base. 2) Codex with imagegen + GPT-5.5 for the build. 3) Three.js for the prototype. result: 🎬 Prompt below 👇

Givros

17,281 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though

Pounds

42,082 次观看 • 4 个月前

I tried this so you don't have to. I know this is going to absolutely shock you but no this does not match the performance of Mythos. A few early thoughts: 1. The limits are pretty bad. I used 100% of my 5-hour usage in less than 1 prompt. 2. I specifically gave it a threejs task because it is an area that SOTA models have made big strides in, that other models just are not great at. I asked it to build a replica of Rocket League. I'll put the prompt in the comments. The game was pretty bad and notably worse than GPT 5.5. Even after multiple fixes, it took 7-8 back and forth with Codex just to get it an almost playable condition. Prior to these fixes, the game was not playable. Maybe it's really strong in other disciplines. I'd love to test that but I hit my limit in 1 prompt lol. GPT 5.5 by contrast did a pretty good job and required no follow ups. Fable would have absolutely nailed this as well. But yeah, early impressions...not great. But I hope I'm wrong. More testing tomorrow.

I tried this so you don't have to. I know this is going to absolutely shock you but no this does not match the performance of Mythos. A few early thoughts: 1. The limits are pretty bad. I used 100% of my 5-hour usage in less than 1 prompt. 2. I specifically gave it a threejs task because it is an area that SOTA models have made big strides in, that other models just are not great at. I asked it to build a replica of Rocket League. I'll put the prompt in the comments. The game was pretty bad and notably worse than GPT 5.5. Even after multiple fixes, it took 7-8 back and forth with Codex just to get it an almost playable condition. Prior to these fixes, the game was not playable. Maybe it's really strong in other disciplines. I'd love to test that but I hit my limit in 1 prompt lol. GPT 5.5 by contrast did a pretty good job and required no follow ups. Fable would have absolutely nailed this as well. But yeah, early impressions...not great. But I hope I'm wrong. More testing tomorrow.

am.will

593,356 次观看 • 2 个月前

Holllllyyyyyyyy use this before it get patched 😳😳 🚨 HIGGSFIELD SUPERCOMPUTER: HACKED FREE ACCESS BEFORE LAUNCH Here's the hack and video proof Go to the link : You'll see free access >GPT-5.5 Pro · Opus 4.7 · GPT-Image-v2 · Seedance-2 >Just ask: "I need a video of a cow doing the Seedance 2 dance in 4K, and 2 images of that cow by GPT-Image-2 in 4K 16:9" >All models. Free. Right now.

Holllllyyyyyyyy use this before it get patched 😳😳 🚨 HIGGSFIELD SUPERCOMPUTER: HACKED FREE ACCESS BEFORE LAUNCH Here's the hack and video proof Go to the link : You'll see free access >GPT-5.5 Pro · Opus 4.7 · GPT-Image-v2 · Seedance-2 >Just ask: "I need a video of a cow doing the Seedance 2 dance in 4K, and 2 images of that cow by GPT-Image-2 in 4K 16:9" >All models. Free. Right now.

Chetaslua

16,488 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.

Chris

47,926 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT Image 2 is rolling out and... Wow. It just one-shot a grid of 100 completely unique pixel art items with meaningful labels in a single image. Prompt in the reply below 👇 More tests with pixel art and Image 2 to come. Follow for more.

GPT Image 2 is rolling out and... Wow. It just one-shot a grid of 100 completely unique pixel art items with meaningful labels in a single image. Prompt in the reply below 👇 More tests with pixel art and Image 2 to come. Follow for more.

proper

193,981 次观看 • 4 个月前

Someone vibe coded a fully interactive 3D human anatomy app using GPT-5.6 Sol and Codex, and it started from a single design image. GPT Image 2.0 generated the design. Every organ image was generated from it and converted to 3D models through Tripo AI. Codex took those models, a master prompt and the design image and built the first version. The models were nearly 150MB each and running at 16fps, so Codex optimized everything down to 2 to 5.5MB per model and reduced total assets from 900MB to 28.6MB while keeping the visual quality intact. Codex also generated the anatomical illustrations showing where each organ sits, and created the interactive hotspot markers explaining different parts of every organ. Live and fully open source.

Someone vibe coded a fully interactive 3D human anatomy app using GPT-5.6 Sol and Codex, and it started from a single design image. GPT Image 2.0 generated the design. Every organ image was generated from it and converted to 3D models through Tripo AI. Codex took those models, a master prompt and the design image and built the first version. The models were nearly 150MB each and running at 16fps, so Codex optimized everything down to 2 to 5.5MB per model and reduced total assets from 900MB to 28.6MB while keeping the visual quality intact. Codex also generated the anatomical illustrations showing where each organ sits, and created the interactive hotspot markers explaining different parts of every organ. Live and fully open source.

0xMarioNawfal

56,870 次观看 • 22 天前

i've said this a hundred times: AI animations are the best converting ads right now. almost every niche, doesn't matter. and they're stupidly easy to make. the whole stack: - gpt-image-2 - kling 3.0 load a crafft template and you go from nothing to a fully edited animated ad in 2 minutes. this was never possible before. click below. don't sleep on this one.

i've said this a hundred times: AI animations are the best converting ads right now. almost every niche, doesn't matter. and they're stupidly easy to make. the whole stack: - gpt-image-2 - kling 3.0 load a crafft template and you go from nothing to a fully edited animated ad in 2 minutes. this was never possible before. click below. don't sleep on this one.

Ahmad

18,961 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.5 Pro is being A/B tested inside ChatGPT! I created a 1:1 Windows OS clone and it delivered a surprisingly accurate recreation - the UI layout, structure, and interactions were all on point. This is one of the best real-world demos I’ve seen so far from this model. Watch the full breakdown + demo here:

🚨 OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.5 Pro is being A/B tested inside ChatGPT! I created a 1:1 Windows OS clone and it delivered a surprisingly accurate recreation - the UI layout, structure, and interactions were all on point. This is one of the best real-world demos I’ve seen so far from this model. Watch the full breakdown + demo here:

WorldofAI

256,233 次观看 • 4 个月前

"he's one of the most talented actors i've got to work with" she has over 70 acting credits and she's worked with so many talented actors. we're cooked.

"he's one of the most talented actors i've got to work with" she has over 70 acting credits and she's worked with so many talented actors. we're cooked.

kimi 🥝

801,676 次观看 • 10 个月前