正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

GPT-6 Astra just turned non-technical people into game developers. Not basic block-and-sphere stuff either, real, playable custom games. Here's the same prompt, run through Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra. Which one's actually better for building games?

ImagineArt

22,418 subscribers

156,964 次观看 • 18 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

Mehul Mohan

318,476 次观看 • 1 天前

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

Givros

32,683 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT-6 Astra × Higgsfield: OpenAI's strongest model yet for coding, reasoning, and complex knowledge work, paired with real-time 3D generation. You can build a playable game from a single prompt: mechanics, story, and every asset generated by Higgsfield MCP. Coming soon to Higgsfield.

GPT-6 Astra × Higgsfield: OpenAI's strongest model yet for coding, reasoning, and complex knowledge work, paired with real-time 3D generation. You can build a playable game from a single prompt: mechanics, story, and every asset generated by Higgsfield MCP. Coming soon to Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

665,972 次观看 • 1 天前

GPT-6 Astra is my favorite model of all time and it's not really close It's a step function similar to Fable or Opus 4.5, the computer use stuff has unlocked truly novel workflows

GPT-6 Astra is my favorite model of all time and it's not really close It's a step function similar to Fable or Opus 4.5, the computer use stuff has unlocked truly novel workflows

Ben Davis

24,852 次观看 • 14 小时前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT-6 Astra (max) created this incredible war scene in Three.js, in a single turn (no examples, basic prompt only). Just look at the detail! On the ship models, on how things interact with the water... And this was only 50K tokens, done in about 12 minutes.

GPT-6 Astra (max) created this incredible war scene in Three.js, in a single turn (no examples, basic prompt only). Just look at the detail! On the ship models, on how things interact with the water... And this was only 50K tokens, done in about 12 minutes.

leo 🐾

43,497 次观看 • 1 天前

Holy Shit GPT-6 Astra is cooking full games now 😱 Playco gave it one grey box kart prototype > 3 themed games in one go , pirate / candy / cyberpunk > most worked first try > 50% fewer manual fixes vs previous model it plays the game inside unity and fixes its own bugs

Holy Shit GPT-6 Astra is cooking full games now 😱 Playco gave it one grey box kart prototype > 3 themed games in one go , pirate / candy / cyberpunk > most worked first try > 50% fewer manual fixes vs previous model it plays the game inside unity and fixes its own bugs

Chetaslua

250,388 次观看 • 2 天前

OpenAI just released GPT-6 Astra, and OpenAI President Greg Brockman is calling it a generational leap, saying he personally believes it could mark the arrival of AGI. Astra launched on Thursday, September 3rd, 2026, following July's GPT-5.6 solo release. Brockman told reporters, "For me personally, I do think we're there. Directionally, I believe this. I think we're on a path to AGI. The timing I think is kind of uncertain, but we are definitely on a path to AGI." OpenAI executives say Astra moves past the chatbot era, capable of handling end to end work on its own across browsers, spreadsheets, codebases, and enterprise apps without a human in the loop. The model was trained on over 100,000 GPUs at the Stargate site in Texas. Access starts through OpenAI's gated Daybreak Access cybersecurity program for enterprise customers, then rolls out to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise, plus the API and Amazon Web Services over the coming days. Ahead of launch, two models appeared in Codex, GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Astra Aeon, with the latter believed to be a higher effort, long horizon variant built for autonomous multi agent work.

OpenAI just released GPT-6 Astra, and OpenAI President Greg Brockman is calling it a generational leap, saying he personally believes it could mark the arrival of AGI. Astra launched on Thursday, September 3rd, 2026, following July's GPT-5.6 solo release. Brockman told reporters, "For me personally, I do think we're there. Directionally, I believe this. I think we're on a path to AGI. The timing I think is kind of uncertain, but we are definitely on a path to AGI." OpenAI executives say Astra moves past the chatbot era, capable of handling end to end work on its own across browsers, spreadsheets, codebases, and enterprise apps without a human in the loop. The model was trained on over 100,000 GPUs at the Stargate site in Texas. Access starts through OpenAI's gated Daybreak Access cybersecurity program for enterprise customers, then rolls out to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise, plus the API and Amazon Web Services over the coming days. Ahead of launch, two models appeared in Codex, GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Astra Aeon, with the latter believed to be a higher effort, long horizon variant built for autonomous multi agent work.

AGTP

20,156 次观看 • 1 天前

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

397,291 次观看 • 3 天前

💫 👩‍🚀 GPT-6 Astra is here (and I'm obsessed) I was able to test this model early and it is so, so good. But even better - it has made me 100x more *ambitious* about what I can build with AI. Why? Browser / computer use means it can use any software to build anything (even games.) Coding broke through some of my hardest problems (data, hardware.) AND best of all, it's delightfully not annoying. Here's what I cover in my hands-on review: 00:00 GPT-6 Astra overview 03:44 Browser use to manage CRM workflows 09:08 Flora thumbnail generation 13:00 Browser use for QA 15:20 One shotting a product intelligence feature 18:36 Hardware hack: live streaming mini computer 22:23 Building AIM-style codex app 24:24 Barbie Bench and a 3D kids game 29:27 Summary: I love her 👉 Full ep up on YT:

💫 👩‍🚀 GPT-6 Astra is here (and I'm obsessed) I was able to test this model early and it is so, so good. But even better - it has made me 100x more ambitious about what I can build with AI. Why? Browser / computer use means it can use any software to build anything (even games.) Coding broke through some of my hardest problems (data, hardware.) AND best of all, it's delightfully not annoying. Here's what I cover in my hands-on review: 00:00 GPT-6 Astra overview 03:44 Browser use to manage CRM workflows 09:08 Flora thumbnail generation 13:00 Browser use for QA 15:20 One shotting a product intelligence feature 18:36 Hardware hack: live streaming mini computer 22:23 Building AIM-style codex app 24:24 Barbie Bench and a 3D kids game 29:27 Summary: I love her 👉 Full ep up on YT:

claire vo 🖤

110,103 次观看 • 1 天前

Building and prototyping games is easier than ever with Sidekick. Our designer built a 3D version of this OpenAI GPT-o1 game demo in <1 hour. Used Autodesk Maya for assets, Unity for engine, @bezi_3d Sidekick for scripting & implementation. Sidekick analyzes your project for real-time context of the asset folder, scene objects, components, and more. This allows it to implement simple mechanics—like movement controls and basic physics—for your characters and objects in seconds. It's the AI tool built by game developers, for game developers.

Building and prototyping games is easier than ever with Sidekick. Our designer built a 3D version of this OpenAI GPT-o1 game demo in <1 hour. Used Autodesk Maya for assets, Unity for engine, @bezi_3d Sidekick for scripting & implementation. Sidekick analyzes your project for real-time context of the asset folder, scene objects, components, and more. This allows it to implement simple mechanics—like movement controls and basic physics—for your characters and objects in seconds. It's the AI tool built by game developers, for game developers.

Bezi

15,295 次观看 • 1 年前

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.

BridgeMind

31,075 次观看 • 2 个月前

Codex isn’t just a coding assistant anymore. It’s becoming a full AI game-dev workspace. 🦫🎮 For this project, Codex handled the workflow by using: 🖼️ GPT Image 2.0 for the visual direction, cards, enemies, and UI assets 🧠 GPT-5.5 for gameplay structure, systems, and iteration 💻 Codex to turn all of that into a real project From cozy capybara shrine images to a real turn-based card battle game. The 2026 AI game dev workflow is getting ridiculous. 🚀 Follow if you’re building games with AI. Want the full prompt I used for this? Comment “CAPYBARA” and I’ll share it.

Codex isn’t just a coding assistant anymore. It’s becoming a full AI game-dev workspace. 🦫🎮 For this project, Codex handled the workflow by using: 🖼️ GPT Image 2.0 for the visual direction, cards, enemies, and UI assets 🧠 GPT-5.5 for gameplay structure, systems, and iteration 💻 Codex to turn all of that into a real project From cozy capybara shrine images to a real turn-based card battle game. The 2026 AI game dev workflow is getting ridiculous. 🚀 Follow if you’re building games with AI. Want the full prompt I used for this? Comment “CAPYBARA” and I’ll share it.

Givros

71,070 次观看 • 4 个月前

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

Bhavy☄️

33,971 次观看 • 2 天前

I used to love playing with trains when I was younger. Recently, I saw someone create a voxel-based train table using Fable 5.1, so I had to try something similar with GPT-6 Astra using three.js. It turned out absolutely amazing! You can actually play and interact with it directly on the website, (link in the thread) start & stop the trains, rotate around the entire table, zoom in & out, & explore all the tiny details. The level of detail is really mind-blowing! This whole experience with Astra feels incredibly magical. I have so many other things I’m building right now that I don’t think I have ever felt this excited about creating! Childhood ideas, random inspirations, games I always wanted to play but don't yet exist, things I once could only imagine, I can now turn them into working, interactive experiences in matter of hours! So now we know what true AGI feels like: imagination becoming reality almost as fast as you can describe it!

I used to love playing with trains when I was younger. Recently, I saw someone create a voxel-based train table using Fable 5.1, so I had to try something similar with GPT-6 Astra using three.js. It turned out absolutely amazing! You can actually play and interact with it directly on the website, (link in the thread) start & stop the trains, rotate around the entire table, zoom in & out, & explore all the tiny details. The level of detail is really mind-blowing! This whole experience with Astra feels incredibly magical. I have so many other things I’m building right now that I don’t think I have ever felt this excited about creating! Childhood ideas, random inspirations, games I always wanted to play but don't yet exist, things I once could only imagine, I can now turn them into working, interactive experiences in matter of hours! So now we know what true AGI feels like: imagination becoming reality almost as fast as you can describe it!

Derya Unutmaz, MD

65,797 次观看 • 1 天前

The new Fable 5.1 built three games and did it 7% cheaper! We gave the same prompts through Atomic Agent: ✦ Sticky ball that rolls up everything in its path ✦ Capybara surfing down a river, Subway Surfers style ✦ Dumpling running an endless conveyor dodge Outputs: ✦ Claude Fable 5, via Atomic Agent: $7.65 ✦ Claude Fable 5.1, via Atomic Agent: $7.08 Run it through an agent and that cache discount is where the money hides. The loop reads the file, watches it break, and pulls the whole context back in to fix it, over and over. Every one of those re-reads costs a quarter on 5.1 of what it cost on 5. Same games on screen, and the newer version just spends less to get there. Across three builds the loop paid for the upgrade on its own.

The new Fable 5.1 built three games and did it 7% cheaper! We gave the same prompts through Atomic Agent: ✦ Sticky ball that rolls up everything in its path ✦ Capybara surfing down a river, Subway Surfers style ✦ Dumpling running an endless conveyor dodge Outputs: ✦ Claude Fable 5, via Atomic Agent: $7.65 ✦ Claude Fable 5.1, via Atomic Agent: $7.08 Run it through an agent and that cache discount is where the money hides. The loop reads the file, watches it break, and pulls the whole context back in to fix it, over and over. Every one of those re-reads costs a quarter on 5.1 of what it cost on 5. Same games on screen, and the newer version just spends less to get there. Across three builds the loop paid for the upgrade on its own.

Atomic Agent

19,948 次观看 • 3 天前

BREAKING: OpenAI just dropped GPT-6 ASTRA!!! 🚀✨ We’ve been testing it extensively at Every 🪨 across coding, writing, and knowledge work. My take: it’s a big upgrade from 5.6-Sol, with some frustrating habits that keep it from matching Fable at the top end. Here’s your vibe check: - The best writing model I’ve tried. It’s fast, produces very little slop, and is easy to steer. It’s a good companion for actually working through the writing I do every day. (Not to mention, it one-shotted the first draft of its own vibe check today!) - The computer use is wild. It can go for hours at a time using complicated apps to get work done. It did the first cut of our Fable 5.1 vibe check video...kind of mindblowing - Impressive 3D games and visualizations. It can make beautiful 3D worlds from a single prompt. I one-shotted a historically accurate rendition of the Battle of Waterloo - It can overcomplicate things. (Especially at higher effort levels.) Ask for a simple interface and you get extra labels, buttons, and features everywhere. It has a habit of turning everything into a landing page. It just doesnt quite match Fable's ability to intuitively understand your prompt and do something delightful (without overcomplicating.) Net Result: If you already live in ChatGPT for Work or Codex and can afford it, it’s an easy upgrade from 5.6-Sol. The biggest proof of Astra's effectiveness at helping you do work is our vibe check. We found out it was launching at 3 AM this morning, and had a 4,000 word vibe check + video done by 2 PM. Not possible without this model. I’m reaching for Astra all day, but Fable 5.1 still gets my biggest tasks. On ambitious builds, Fable is better at understanding what I want and taking it further than I would have thought to ask. State of Play: Astra is launching to Enterprise customers today, and the rest of ChatGPT users over the coming days. Now, both OpenAI and Anthropic have a higher class of models that cost more to use. That changes who gets to use frontier AI and how. It's also a new vector of competition between them: Fable and Astra are priced at the same level. We'll see what that means for adoption in the coming days and weeks. read our full vibe check Every 🪨 today:

BREAKING: OpenAI just dropped GPT-6 ASTRA!!! 🚀✨ We’ve been testing it extensively at Every 🪨 across coding, writing, and knowledge work. My take: it’s a big upgrade from 5.6-Sol, with some frustrating habits that keep it from matching Fable at the top end. Here’s your vibe check: - The best writing model I’ve tried. It’s fast, produces very little slop, and is easy to steer. It’s a good companion for actually working through the writing I do every day. (Not to mention, it one-shotted the first draft of its own vibe check today!) - The computer use is wild. It can go for hours at a time using complicated apps to get work done. It did the first cut of our Fable 5.1 vibe check video...kind of mindblowing - Impressive 3D games and visualizations. It can make beautiful 3D worlds from a single prompt. I one-shotted a historically accurate rendition of the Battle of Waterloo - It can overcomplicate things. (Especially at higher effort levels.) Ask for a simple interface and you get extra labels, buttons, and features everywhere. It has a habit of turning everything into a landing page. It just doesnt quite match Fable's ability to intuitively understand your prompt and do something delightful (without overcomplicating.) Net Result: If you already live in ChatGPT for Work or Codex and can afford it, it’s an easy upgrade from 5.6-Sol. The biggest proof of Astra's effectiveness at helping you do work is our vibe check. We found out it was launching at 3 AM this morning, and had a 4,000 word vibe check + video done by 2 PM. Not possible without this model. I’m reaching for Astra all day, but Fable 5.1 still gets my biggest tasks. On ambitious builds, Fable is better at understanding what I want and taking it further than I would have thought to ask. State of Play: Astra is launching to Enterprise customers today, and the rest of ChatGPT users over the coming days. Now, both OpenAI and Anthropic have a higher class of models that cost more to use. That changes who gets to use frontier AI and how. It's also a new vector of competition between them: Fable and Astra are priced at the same level. We'll see what that means for adoption in the coming days and weeks. read our full vibe check Every 🪨 today:

Dan Shipper

381,484 次观看 • 1 天前

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

97,810 次观看 • 3 天前

Unity 6 + Opus 4.8 built a Minecraft-style game with just 2 prompts 😱 The first prompt took around 15 minutes. The second prompt took around 40 minutes. I wrote down everything I wanted for the first version, GPT expanded it with more details, and I sent it to Opus. Less than an hour later, I had a playable game. I actually spent more time setting up Unity 6 than building the game itself. It's wild to think about where this is heading. If 2 prompts can do this, imagine what an entire project looks like when every feature is built this way. Congrats to Anthropic. What they're building is incredible.

Unity 6 + Opus 4.8 built a Minecraft-style game with just 2 prompts 😱 The first prompt took around 15 minutes. The second prompt took around 40 minutes. I wrote down everything I wanted for the first version, GPT expanded it with more details, and I sent it to Opus. Less than an hour later, I had a playable game. I actually spent more time setting up Unity 6 than building the game itself. It's wild to think about where this is heading. If 2 prompts can do this, imagine what an entire project looks like when every feature is built this way. Congrats to Anthropic. What they're building is incredible.

Matthew

25,548 次观看 • 3 个月前