正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra on Higgsfield. Both models got the same task: build a 3D game prototype - with GPT-6.1 Sol completing the same workflow 4x faster at one-fifth the cost.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

242,083 subscribers

51,269 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

游戏科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

22 条评论

I'm_Gregson 的头像

I'm_Gregson4 天前

Larpers...

NekoPrompt 的头像

NekoPrompt4 天前

Does this exceed Claude 5.5?

Mira Synth Tech 的头像

Mira Synth Tech4 天前

4x faster 1/5 the cost?? Sol is cooking. That’s a massive leap for prototyping

Duggu 的头像

Duggu4 天前

6.1 sol looks better😱

Echo✨Muse 的头像

Echo✨Muse4 天前

Looks much better.

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack 的头像

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack4 天前

@higgsfield_ai curious if the Sol model's faster completion affects quality. Sometimes speed trades off with depth in game mechanics.

sanzida 的头像

sanzida4 天前

That’s a pretty striking difference in speed and cost. 👀 4× faster at one-fifth the cost makes the comparison especially interesting for 3D workflows. 🎮🔥

Aaliya 的头像

Aaliya4 天前

u guys r so fast

human00001 的头像

human000014 天前

Locking the character bible before an overnight agent run is the part that saves the morning redo.

Luis de Oliveira 的头像

Luis de Oliveira4 天前

@Sonecarox

TÜRK 的头像

TÜRK4 天前

Scamfield

Servantes 的头像

Servantes4 天前

Bro this is scam not marketing

Axel Großklaus 的头像

Axel Großklaus4 天前

"a game prototype" that is the Elden Ring Shadow of the Erdtree DLC..

DX | Video Editor 的头像

DX | Video Editor4 天前

what happen？

Vitman 的头像

Vitman4 天前

and the graphics are more vivid in GPT 6.1 Sol

Saud 的头像

Saud4 天前

This is amazing AI ever i tried 💓 100% recommend 😍

Gem | AI SaaS & Tools 的头像

Gem | AI SaaS & Tools4 天前

AWESOME!

Blum 的头像

Blum4 天前

Great comparison. GPT has been putting out some really good models lately

Hana Kaito AI🌞 的头像

Hana Kaito AI🌞4 天前

Speed and cost make a huge difference when building 3D prototypes. Exciting to see AI pushing game development forward!

Ergod 的头像

Ergod4 天前

didn't realize we could do all this in higgs i'll have to give yall a try :)

ShadowAguy 的头像

ShadowAguy4 天前

If both prototypes are equally playable, speed matters less than cleanup. How many manual rescues and failed tool calls did each model need?

Harout Boyajian 的头像

Harout Boyajian4 天前

Give us the game links so we can try it if it's true.

相关视频

GPT 6.1 Sol 30x cheaper than Sonnet 5.5 at 3D ⚙️ openAI just dropped GPT 6.1 Sol, we put it up against Sonnet 5.5 and made them create a 3D keyboard assembly video in Three.js Run both models via sub ->

GPT 6.1 Sol 30x cheaper than Sonnet 5.5 at 3D ⚙️ openAI just dropped GPT 6.1 Sol, we put it up against Sonnet 5.5 and made them create a 3D keyboard assembly video in Three.js Run both models via sub ->

atomic.chat

194,400 次观看 • 4 天前

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 in 3D gaming. Two takes on a high-speed ride through a cyberpunk city. Made with Higgsfield.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 in 3D gaming. Two takes on a high-speed ride through a cyberpunk city. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

42,030 次观看 • 3 天前

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Tony

112,633 次观看 • 8 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

199,798 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

535,686 次观看 • 11 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

67,504 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 GEMINI 4 vs GPT-6 Astra Tested both models with same prompt GPT-6 Astra: much more detailed character + environment Gemini 4: more basic gameplay scene Overall GPT-6 Astra COOKED… But Gemini 4 Is Also Good Is Google finally back in the game?

🚨 GEMINI 4 vs GPT-6 Astra Tested both models with same prompt GPT-6 Astra: much more detailed character + environment Gemini 4: more basic gameplay scene Overall GPT-6 Astra COOKED… But Gemini 4 Is Also Good Is Google finally back in the game?

Salio

796,464 次观看 • 15 天前

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

Wesley

78,394 次观看 • 23 天前

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

166,598 次观看 • 10 天前

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT-6.1 Sol found a paying client while making a label for a friend. From the bottle photo to the brewery’s inbox with Higgsfield inside ChatGPT.

GPT-6.1 Sol found a paying client while making a label for a friend. From the bottle photo to the brewery’s inbox with Higgsfield inside ChatGPT.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

13,208 次观看 • 2 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

1,113,334 次观看 • 11 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Bridgebench

55,327 次观看 • 11 天前

Sam Altman announces the release of GPT 6.1 Sol, OpenAI's most powerful model yet.

Sam Altman announces the release of GPT 6.1 Sol, OpenAI's most powerful model yet.

Yahoo Finance

50,448 次观看 • 4 天前

GPT-6 Astra put together the flying Oval Office. GPT-6 Astra + Blender + Higgsfield Supercomputer, the whole thing from one description.

GPT-6 Astra put together the flying Oval Office. GPT-6 Astra + Blender + Higgsfield Supercomputer, the whole thing from one description.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

29,076 次观看 • 28 天前

Codex tip: once GPT-6.1 Sol is your main model, stop running Astra on every turn put Astra on call as an architect agent GPT-6.1 Sol keeps writing the code Astra only gets spawned at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Astra reviews. Sol ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > GPT-6.1 Sol on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Luna > worker edits and runs tests on Sol > researcher pulls the docs on Luna > all three on medium > Astra on call as the architect > auto_review checks every approval paste the tree and this prompt into Codex ↓ "Rebuild my Codex setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.codex/agents and .codex/agents for agents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new TOML files only for missing roles > explorer and researcher on gpt-6-luna, worker on gpt-6.1-sol, all with model_reasoning_effort medium > Add an architect agent on gpt-6-astra, model_reasoning_effort high, whose only job is reviewing plans, repeated errors and finished work > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. In ~/.codex/config.toml set model to gpt-6.1-sol, model_reasoning_effort to high and approvals_reviewer to auto_review 3. Find anything that would override this (active profiles, flags in my shell aliases, agents.default_subagent_model). Report it, change nothing 4. Add one rule to AGENTS.md: spawn the architect before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

Codex tip: once GPT-6.1 Sol is your main model, stop running Astra on every turn put Astra on call as an architect agent GPT-6.1 Sol keeps writing the code Astra only gets spawned at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Astra reviews. Sol ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > GPT-6.1 Sol on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Luna > worker edits and runs tests on Sol > researcher pulls the docs on Luna > all three on medium > Astra on call as the architect > auto_review checks every approval paste the tree and this prompt into Codex ↓ "Rebuild my Codex setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.codex/agents and .codex/agents for agents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new TOML files only for missing roles > explorer and researcher on gpt-6-luna, worker on gpt-6.1-sol, all with model_reasoning_effort medium > Add an architect agent on gpt-6-astra, model_reasoning_effort high, whose only job is reviewing plans, repeated errors and finished work > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. In ~/.codex/config.toml set model to gpt-6.1-sol, model_reasoning_effort to high and approvals_reviewer to auto_review 3. Find anything that would override this (active profiles, flags in my shell aliases, agents.default_subagent_model). Report it, change nothing 4. Add one rule to AGENTS.md: spawn the architect before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

delost

984,447 次观看 • 3 天前

GPT-6 Astra helps Proaction build fleet-management agents faster, with shorter computer-use runs to get the same work done.

GPT-6 Astra helps Proaction build fleet-management agents faster, with shorter computer-use runs to get the same work done.

OpenAI Developers

67,438 次观看 • 8 天前

GPT-6.1 Sol turned a song file into a release campaign. It took the controls and gave the track a cover, a rollout and a shot at the stage. Higgsfield plugin inside ChatGPT.

GPT-6.1 Sol turned a song file into a release campaign. It took the controls and gave the track a cover, a rollout and a shot at the stage. Higgsfield plugin inside ChatGPT.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

16,772 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT-6.1 Sol on Higgsfield built a prototype that gives ranchers a bird’s-eye view of their herd. It turns drone footage into live herd counts and tracking, with alerts when an animal wanders off.

GPT-6.1 Sol on Higgsfield built a prototype that gives ranchers a bird’s-eye view of their herd. It turns drone footage into live herd counts and tracking, with alerts when an animal wanders off.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

91,410 次观看 • 4 天前

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 次观看 • 2 个月前