Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5 explaining how an engine works. Take it apart piece by piece, then watch all four strokes fire in order. Made with Higgsfield.
40,981 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)
21 Comments

That's pretty good, considering how cheap Terra is.

Terra feels cleaner but Opus packs more detail in the gauges. Both make the strokes click.

I needed this back in school. So much easier to follow when you can see everything moving

Terra’s cheap tho?

Here we go again with the fraud marketing

AI 时代拉开差距的从来不是工具本身,而是使用工具的“精细度”。很多人抱怨 AI 写出来的东西一股机器味,本质上是因为他们的 Prompt 还停留在“请帮我写个文案”这种业余水平。真正厉害的人都在把 AI 当成一个有具体人格、有大厂资深经验的团队总监去规训。我主页置顶刚好分享了一个肉身测过无数次的文案大师指令,需要的兄弟自取,看完就知道什么叫降维打击了。

Hot take: for explainers, 'which model looks better' is the wrong scoreboard. The question is which one gets intake → compression → power → exhaust right on the first take. Pretty and wrong still costs you the regen.

what is the best model ?

Terra is just wildly cheaper

That teardown sold me. I have watched too many explainers skip the stroke order, and getting it in sequence is what makes it stick.

From static diagram to working model. 👀

W opus

We actually compared it to Opus in our coverage. Terra's visual reasoning and writing are where that efficiency really shows.

How much does it cost for each one?

当AI能把发动机原理讲得直观又好看,科普创作者的门槛就变了。谁能让人看懂,谁就更有机会获得流量。

Good@higgsfield_ai

Tell me why I can't just use Opus to make this myself?

Watching it come apart piece by piece then fire in order is the fun part

Engine explainers are such a good test, the timing has to be right or the whole thing falls apart. Which one needed fewer retries?

How do you make it so cool

Great
