Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Grant Cardone on why every institution will eventually combine Bitcoin and real estate "The problem in real estate is CapEx. You're gonna have to put a new roof, new gutters, new floor carpets, paint the place, fix the pool. Whether it's the Vatican or the Sistine Chapel, time goes...

scottmelker's profile picture

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,085,301 subscribers

37,382 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ИгрыФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Multifamily refi with a BTC collateralized loan 🤯 Bitcoin is changing the way lenders think about underwriting real estate risk Every asset class is converging to Bitcoin
5:22

Multifamily refi with a BTC collateralized loan 🤯 Bitcoin is changing the way lenders think about underwriting real estate risk Every asset class is converging to Bitcoin

Max Gagliardi

228,067 просмотров • 1 год назад

Barry Sternlicht gives an insightful view about the challenges of real estate right now - and how to still make a lot of money in the current environment Here's what he said: "I think people, as they always do, tend to look in the rear view mirror and they look at a suboptimal performance of the real estate asset class across the last 3-4 years. Nvidia goes up a trillion dollars in four months. Like the hot kids on the block are everything AI, everything chatbot, etc... There are meme stocks that go from zero to $7 a share on a tweet. Crypto - there's worthless coins with $20+ billion dollar market caps. There's a coin called Useless. It's [literally] useless. It debuted in March 2025 and it went to a $700 million value. And the coin says "we are completely useless" In real estate people get rich but it's boring. You get rich holding on to it over long periods of time. It's not a day trading asset. The country right now is very impatient. So people want to play the hot thing. Real estate looks sort of sad in your portfolio right now. The only thing it beats is treasuries. And even then, it's not even beaten that. But you'll do well picking properties in the right cities... Everything is micro in real estate. For example, I built a building in South Beach. The first lease was $54. It's on the beach, and nobody built a new office building in 20+ years. We leased it up in the pandemic. It's 100% leased. A tenant actually needs to grow, and they called us last week. They're paying $125 and we'll re-lease it at $175. I mean, you can still make a lot of money if you get the micro market right."
1:44

Barry Sternlicht gives an insightful view about the challenges of real estate right now - and how to still make a lot of money in the current environment Here's what he said: "I think people, as they always do, tend to look in the rear view mirror and they look at a suboptimal performance of the real estate asset class across the last 3-4 years. Nvidia goes up a trillion dollars in four months. Like the hot kids on the block are everything AI, everything chatbot, etc... There are meme stocks that go from zero to $7 a share on a tweet. Crypto - there's worthless coins with $20+ billion dollar market caps. There's a coin called Useless. It's [literally] useless. It debuted in March 2025 and it went to a $700 million value. And the coin says "we are completely useless" In real estate people get rich but it's boring. You get rich holding on to it over long periods of time. It's not a day trading asset. The country right now is very impatient. So people want to play the hot thing. Real estate looks sort of sad in your portfolio right now. The only thing it beats is treasuries. And even then, it's not even beaten that. But you'll do well picking properties in the right cities... Everything is micro in real estate. For example, I built a building in South Beach. The first lease was $54. It's on the beach, and nobody built a new office building in 20+ years. We leased it up in the pandemic. It's 100% leased. A tenant actually needs to grow, and they called us last week. They're paying $125 and we'll re-lease it at $175. I mean, you can still make a lot of money if you get the micro market right."

Triple Net Investor

128,360 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Billionaire Grant Cardone says his company will bring "trillions" in new investments to Bitcoin. "We will be the largest real estate Bitcoin hybrid company ever."
1:02

Billionaire Grant Cardone says his company will bring "trillions" in new investments to Bitcoin. "We will be the largest real estate Bitcoin hybrid company ever."

Bitcoin Junkies

12,580 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Warren Buffett thoughtfully explains why investing in stocks/equities is better than real estate, during Berkshire's latest annual meeting: "In respect to real estate, it's so much harder than stocks in terms of negotiation of deals, time spent, the involvement of multiple parties in the ownership. Usually when real estate gets in trouble, you find out you're dealing with more than equity holder. But there have been times when large amounts of real estate... I've changed hands at bargain prices, but usually stocks were cheaper, but there were a lot easier to do. Charlie did more real estate. Charlie enjoyed real estate transactions, and he actually did a fair number of them in the last five years of his life. But he was playing a game that was an interesting game to him. But I think if you'd asked him to make a choice when he was 21, he'd either be in stocks exclusively the rest of his life or real estate the rest of his life. He would have chosen stocks in a second. There's just so much more opportunity, at least in the United States. There's so much more opportunity that presents itself in the security market than it does in real estate and in real estate. You're usually dealing with a single owner or a family that owns maybe a large property they've had a long time. Maybe they've borrowed too much money against them. Maybe the population trends are against them. But to them, it's an enormous... When you walk down to the New York Stock Exchange, you can do billions of dollars worth of business totally anonymous, and you can do it in five minutes. And the trades are complete when they're complete. In real estate, when you make a deal, a big deal with a distressed lender, when you sign the deal, then you go into another phase. Then people start negotiating more things and more things. It's a whole different game. And a different type of person, to some extent, enjoys the game. We did a few real estate deals that came our way in 2008 and 2009, but the amount of time that they would take us compared to doing something intelligent and probably better in securities, there was just no comparison. I mean, in a real estate deal, every sentence is important. In stocks, if somebody needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire or something and they call us and the price is right, it's done in five seconds. And it closes all the time."
2:36

Warren Buffett thoughtfully explains why investing in stocks/equities is better than real estate, during Berkshire's latest annual meeting: "In respect to real estate, it's so much harder than stocks in terms of negotiation of deals, time spent, the involvement of multiple parties in the ownership. Usually when real estate gets in trouble, you find out you're dealing with more than equity holder. But there have been times when large amounts of real estate... I've changed hands at bargain prices, but usually stocks were cheaper, but there were a lot easier to do. Charlie did more real estate. Charlie enjoyed real estate transactions, and he actually did a fair number of them in the last five years of his life. But he was playing a game that was an interesting game to him. But I think if you'd asked him to make a choice when he was 21, he'd either be in stocks exclusively the rest of his life or real estate the rest of his life. He would have chosen stocks in a second. There's just so much more opportunity, at least in the United States. There's so much more opportunity that presents itself in the security market than it does in real estate and in real estate. You're usually dealing with a single owner or a family that owns maybe a large property they've had a long time. Maybe they've borrowed too much money against them. Maybe the population trends are against them. But to them, it's an enormous... When you walk down to the New York Stock Exchange, you can do billions of dollars worth of business totally anonymous, and you can do it in five minutes. And the trades are complete when they're complete. In real estate, when you make a deal, a big deal with a distressed lender, when you sign the deal, then you go into another phase. Then people start negotiating more things and more things. It's a whole different game. And a different type of person, to some extent, enjoys the game. We did a few real estate deals that came our way in 2008 and 2009, but the amount of time that they would take us compared to doing something intelligent and probably better in securities, there was just no comparison. I mean, in a real estate deal, every sentence is important. In stocks, if somebody needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire or something and they call us and the price is right, it's done in five seconds. And it closes all the time."

Triple Net Investor

1,042,388 просмотров • 1 год назад

You'd be amazed how many wealthy people that say they're rich do not have liquidity. Liquidity is defined by the ability at any moment to have liquid cash. You're not rich if it's all tied up in real estate. You're not rich if it's in jewelry and in cars and in boats and all that stuff. Sure. It's very hard to get 5 million liquid because in this market, that makes you $250,000 a year pre-tax. You have a family of four and poo-poo hits the fan in your world and everybody loses their job, you can sustain a family of $250k pre-tax. That's why it's the magic number.
1:11

You'd be amazed how many wealthy people that say they're rich do not have liquidity. Liquidity is defined by the ability at any moment to have liquid cash. You're not rich if it's all tied up in real estate. You're not rich if it's in jewelry and in cars and in boats and all that stuff. Sure. It's very hard to get 5 million liquid because in this market, that makes you $250,000 a year pre-tax. You have a family of four and poo-poo hits the fan in your world and everybody loses their job, you can sustain a family of $250k pre-tax. That's why it's the magic number.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

167,349 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Gavin Newsom’s $101 million dollar Pacific Palisades low income housing projects EXPOSED The new housing complexes come with ‘covenants,’ after a certain amount of years they are no longer low income and convert to market rate James Li It’s a full blown land grab, “One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate” “Let me tell you what Gavin Newsom is really up to with this hundred million dollar low income housing project in the Palisades. This ultimately is a real estate play in my opinion, because they want this building to go into nice affluent neighborhoods. Because the value of that building is going to be astronomically higher than versus building it in another area where it's underdeveloped or it's a new neighborhood, or it's more on the outskirts of la and ultimately all these affordable units that they have covenants on them. So in 15, 20, 25 years, depending on the, the exact building, all of those affordable housing units will convert to market rate. So that's why they want it in those areas. It's not because like, oh, we're helping the homeless people out. It's like, oh no, this, this is just like a giveaway to real estate developers, right? One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate. So like this is just him placating to his donors, making sure that they're needs, quote unquote, are being met. This is a long term real estate play to say, okay, we're going to put this building here because in 25 years this building will be worth like 20x if we versus we put in another neighborhood.” It’s all about kickbacks for Gavin Newsom’s donors You know the new low income housing complexes will covenants because that’s what the other properties in LA and San Diego come with. It’s the Democrat scam
1:09

Gavin Newsom’s $101 million dollar Pacific Palisades low income housing projects EXPOSED The new housing complexes come with ‘covenants,’ after a certain amount of years they are no longer low income and convert to market rate James Li It’s a full blown land grab, “One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate” “Let me tell you what Gavin Newsom is really up to with this hundred million dollar low income housing project in the Palisades. This ultimately is a real estate play in my opinion, because they want this building to go into nice affluent neighborhoods. Because the value of that building is going to be astronomically higher than versus building it in another area where it's underdeveloped or it's a new neighborhood, or it's more on the outskirts of la and ultimately all these affordable units that they have covenants on them. So in 15, 20, 25 years, depending on the, the exact building, all of those affordable housing units will convert to market rate. So that's why they want it in those areas. It's not because like, oh, we're helping the homeless people out. It's like, oh no, this, this is just like a giveaway to real estate developers, right? One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate. So like this is just him placating to his donors, making sure that they're needs, quote unquote, are being met. This is a long term real estate play to say, okay, we're going to put this building here because in 25 years this building will be worth like 20x if we versus we put in another neighborhood.” It’s all about kickbacks for Gavin Newsom’s donors You know the new low income housing complexes will covenants because that’s what the other properties in LA and San Diego come with. It’s the Democrat scam

Wall Street Apes

47,016 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I don’t think enough people are talking about Local Law 97 in New York City. It’s a carbon tax on the real estate industry in one of its largest markets in the world. This has profound implications for the real estate industry not just in New York City, but across the United States: This sort of regulation is on the docket in a whole bunch of cities. Cities are largely progressive. The real estate industry is concentrated in cities and also cities’ largest source of carbon emissions. So it follows that local regulation by America’s mayors is going to have a gigantic impact on the real estate industry, as cities enact regulations to decarbonize. So for New York City, Local Law 97 goes into effect next year. The good news is, under next year’s emission standards, about 80% of buildings should make the cut. But by 2030, as the emissions standards intensity, only about 25% of buildings would make the cut without any retrofitting. Yes, retrofitting is expensive. And it gets more expensive the older the building is. New York City has a lot of pre-war buildings. But it’s a fact that sustainable buildings are worth more money—it’s true today as much as it will be true in the future when LL97 is in effect. So real estate owners need to spend the money now to retrofit their assets in preparation for Local Law 97, and it’ll pay dividends in the future, because sustainability is good business. Overall I think a regulatory imperative for the real estate industry is a good thing. It’s going to lead to more sustainable buildings and more valuable assets that have more functional longevity to them, preparing the real estate industry for the future. For what it’s worth, there are two other forces converging upon the real estate industry and forcing it to decarbonize: Capital markets: Preferentially deploying capital to sustainable assets Private markets: The biggest tenants have ambitious sustainability pledges, and the real estate industry is a huge part of the supply chain to someone like Walmart or Amazon or Netflix. They don’t want to lease an inefficient building.
6:16

I don’t think enough people are talking about Local Law 97 in New York City. It’s a carbon tax on the real estate industry in one of its largest markets in the world. This has profound implications for the real estate industry not just in New York City, but across the United States: This sort of regulation is on the docket in a whole bunch of cities. Cities are largely progressive. The real estate industry is concentrated in cities and also cities’ largest source of carbon emissions. So it follows that local regulation by America’s mayors is going to have a gigantic impact on the real estate industry, as cities enact regulations to decarbonize. So for New York City, Local Law 97 goes into effect next year. The good news is, under next year’s emission standards, about 80% of buildings should make the cut. But by 2030, as the emissions standards intensity, only about 25% of buildings would make the cut without any retrofitting. Yes, retrofitting is expensive. And it gets more expensive the older the building is. New York City has a lot of pre-war buildings. But it’s a fact that sustainable buildings are worth more money—it’s true today as much as it will be true in the future when LL97 is in effect. So real estate owners need to spend the money now to retrofit their assets in preparation for Local Law 97, and it’ll pay dividends in the future, because sustainability is good business. Overall I think a regulatory imperative for the real estate industry is a good thing. It’s going to lead to more sustainable buildings and more valuable assets that have more functional longevity to them, preparing the real estate industry for the future. For what it’s worth, there are two other forces converging upon the real estate industry and forcing it to decarbonize: Capital markets: Preferentially deploying capital to sustainable assets Private markets: The biggest tenants have ambitious sustainability pledges, and the real estate industry is a huge part of the supply chain to someone like Walmart or Amazon or Netflix. They don’t want to lease an inefficient building.

Brendan Wallace

24,033 просмотров • 3 лет назад

NEW: MICHAEL SAYLOR SAYS LIVE ON CNBC THAT EVERY COMPANY IN THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER OFF HOLDING #BITCOIN THAN USD "YOU DON"T WANT MONEY IN FIAT CURRENCY, GOLD, OR REAL ESTATE." HE'S RIGHT 🔥
1:08

NEW: MICHAEL SAYLOR SAYS LIVE ON CNBC THAT EVERY COMPANY IN THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER OFF HOLDING #BITCOIN THAN USD "YOU DON"T WANT MONEY IN FIAT CURRENCY, GOLD, OR REAL ESTATE." HE'S RIGHT 🔥

The Bitcoin Historian

64,860 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

PROPY IS LIQUID REAL ESTATE Imagine a world where real estate transactions taking a few seconds to minutes as opposed to the antiquated and slow process we have now Propy will allow you to buy a home with crypto. Allow you to borrow against your crypto in order to get the home & then will finalize the documents using A.I. Propy owns the 1st NFT Real Estate transaction in the world as well as in America. Currently listed on Coinbase & NOW listed on Kucoin as well… PRO is one of my top 3 holdings for this bull run moving forward
0:50

PROPY IS LIQUID REAL ESTATE Imagine a world where real estate transactions taking a few seconds to minutes as opposed to the antiquated and slow process we have now Propy will allow you to buy a home with crypto. Allow you to borrow against your crypto in order to get the home & then will finalize the documents using A.I. Propy owns the 1st NFT Real Estate transaction in the world as well as in America. Currently listed on Coinbase & NOW listed on Kucoin as well… PRO is one of my top 3 holdings for this bull run moving forward

The Bearable Bull

49,280 просмотров • 1 год назад

$1 Billion of Bitcoin or $1 Billion of real estate? 🤔 Grant Cardone: "I'd take the Bitcoin in a heartbeat."
0:28

$1 Billion of Bitcoin or $1 Billion of real estate? 🤔 Grant Cardone: "I'd take the Bitcoin in a heartbeat."

Altcoin Daily

154,255 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Grant Cardone NEW: Real Estate Mogul Grant Cardone says #Bitcoin is the "money multiplier" 🚀
18:06

Grant Cardone NEW: Real Estate Mogul Grant Cardone says #Bitcoin is the "money multiplier" 🚀

Bitcoin Magazine

40,177 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Meet Integra, a full-stack, layer 1 blockchain built by real estate asset managers with $12B+ AuM and the world’s leading tokenization companies. #Integra is made for one asset only. Real estate. To transform it into the next stock market and beyond. Liquid. Programmable. Accessible.
1:20

Meet Integra, a full-stack, layer 1 blockchain built by real estate asset managers with $12B+ AuM and the world’s leading tokenization companies. #Integra is made for one asset only. Real estate. To transform it into the next stock market and beyond. Liquid. Programmable. Accessible.

integra. | Testnet Arc

361,455 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Whitney Webb warns: Digital ID + tokenization is paving the way for total control "Everything will be tokenized on one universal digital ledger — with a unique identifier for every asset and person. Larry Fink (now at WEF) says it all: real estate, gold, Bitcoin, even the Amazon rainforest turned into financial tokens with surveillance drones. This isn't just convenience—it's a massive new asset class that could repeat the 2008 financial crisis playbook, only bigger. Digital ID is the highway to this system." The future of money, nature, and freedom is being planned right now. 3:06 clip inside—must-watch.
3:06

Whitney Webb warns: Digital ID + tokenization is paving the way for total control "Everything will be tokenized on one universal digital ledger — with a unique identifier for every asset and person. Larry Fink (now at WEF) says it all: real estate, gold, Bitcoin, even the Amazon rainforest turned into financial tokens with surveillance drones. This isn't just convenience—it's a massive new asset class that could repeat the 2008 financial crisis playbook, only bigger. Digital ID is the highway to this system." The future of money, nature, and freedom is being planned right now. 3:06 clip inside—must-watch.

Camus

30,619 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bad News for Stocks and Real Estate: Chamath Explains The Great Economic Reset In the tweet below, Chamath Palihapitiya points out that Trump has two core constituencies that are generally asset-light: 1) young people 2) working-class / middle-class On E217, Chamath Palihapitiya broke down his thoughts: "I tend to be in the Stevie Cohen camp. It's not like the bottom is going to fall out, but there's a lot of room for concern." -- In a recent interview, Steven Cohen said that a combination of tariffs, slowing immigration, and DOGE has him bearish in the short-term. -- "I'm actually pretty negative for the first time in a while. It wouldn't surprise me to see a significant correction." Chamath agreed: "It is bad news for the stock market and it is bad news for asset owners." " I think people want this austerity." " So if you are going to feed your constituents and your constituents don't own stocks and your constituents don't own homes, or they are so wealthy that they can be inoculated from a massive drawdown in those asset categories, what do you think the winning strategy is?" " If you want to cement political power, I think it requires a walking down of these asset markets in a meaningful way." "That's stocks and that's real estate." "And I just don't see any other way around it."
1:12

Bad News for Stocks and Real Estate: Chamath Explains The Great Economic Reset In the tweet below, Chamath Palihapitiya points out that Trump has two core constituencies that are generally asset-light: 1) young people 2) working-class / middle-class On E217, Chamath Palihapitiya broke down his thoughts: "I tend to be in the Stevie Cohen camp. It's not like the bottom is going to fall out, but there's a lot of room for concern." -- In a recent interview, Steven Cohen said that a combination of tariffs, slowing immigration, and DOGE has him bearish in the short-term. -- "I'm actually pretty negative for the first time in a while. It wouldn't surprise me to see a significant correction." Chamath agreed: "It is bad news for the stock market and it is bad news for asset owners." " I think people want this austerity." " So if you are going to feed your constituents and your constituents don't own stocks and your constituents don't own homes, or they are so wealthy that they can be inoculated from a massive drawdown in those asset categories, what do you think the winning strategy is?" " If you want to cement political power, I think it requires a walking down of these asset markets in a meaningful way." "That's stocks and that's real estate." "And I just don't see any other way around it."

The All-In Podcast

126,034 просмотров • 1 год назад

Charlie Munger on investing in Real Estate in USA: "Those Patels from India who own all the Motels in USA, they live in the goddamn motel." “They pay no income taxes, don't pay much workers' compensation...and you want to compete with them?…Not I.” “Every dime they get, they fix the thing and buy another motel. I don't want to compete with them" 🥶 "So, in real estate, you got all those bullshitters and liars, so it's not a bit easy if you're starting out." "And you've got people who love real estate like Asians, Hacidic Jews, they're smart people and they know the tricks." - Charlie Munger. 2017
1:24

Charlie Munger on investing in Real Estate in USA: "Those Patels from India who own all the Motels in USA, they live in the goddamn motel." “They pay no income taxes, don't pay much workers' compensation...and you want to compete with them?…Not I.” “Every dime they get, they fix the thing and buy another motel. I don't want to compete with them" 🥶 "So, in real estate, you got all those bullshitters and liars, so it's not a bit easy if you're starting out." "And you've got people who love real estate like Asians, Hacidic Jews, they're smart people and they know the tricks." - Charlie Munger. 2017

Ronit Pereira

1,346,507 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 NEW: In a CNBC interview, American Bitcoin's Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer, Eric Trump, called Bitcoin the "modern-day gold" and the "greatest hedge to real estate that there is," adding that the world's wealthiest families, companies, and sovereign wealth funds are "hoarding" the asset because its "the greatest asset of our time."
0:36

🇺🇸 NEW: In a CNBC interview, American Bitcoin's Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer, Eric Trump, called Bitcoin the "modern-day gold" and the "greatest hedge to real estate that there is," adding that the world's wealthiest families, companies, and sovereign wealth funds are "hoarding" the asset because its "the greatest asset of our time."

CoinDesk

50,191 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"If 1/3 of every millionaire (in the world) went and bought one $70,000 bitcoin today, it'll all be gone and the price is gonna go up" "If bitcoin goes down to $1, the whole world is gonna bid on it...in one minute it's back to $80-90,000 dollars because the bidding is gonna push the price up" Grant Cardone #btc
1:00

"If 1/3 of every millionaire (in the world) went and bought one $70,000 bitcoin today, it'll all be gone and the price is gonna go up" "If bitcoin goes down to $1, the whole world is gonna bid on it...in one minute it's back to $80-90,000 dollars because the bidding is gonna push the price up" Grant Cardone #btc

GuruLeaks

20,562 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Threadguy reveals the real reason Waymo is going to take over the world "The real value of Waymo is not that it's cheaper. It's that you get in a Waymo and you don't have to talk to anybody. That is why Waymo is gonna take over the world and flip Uber. Nobody actually cares about the 10% discount or saving a little bit of money on gas." "They just don't want to talk to the guy who drives the Uber. And requesting a silent Uber is just a weird thing to do, you're like an asshole if you do that. I would rather walk than request a silent Uber honestly."
0:52

Threadguy reveals the real reason Waymo is going to take over the world "The real value of Waymo is not that it's cheaper. It's that you get in a Waymo and you don't have to talk to anybody. That is why Waymo is gonna take over the world and flip Uber. Nobody actually cares about the 10% discount or saving a little bit of money on gas." "They just don't want to talk to the guy who drives the Uber. And requesting a silent Uber is just a weird thing to do, you're like an asshole if you do that. I would rather walk than request a silent Uber honestly."

Kai

77,845 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Real estate agent and brokers. The recent ruling in Missouri is wrong, will only benefit litigators, ambulance, tracers, and I believe will be appealed. More importantly, this ruling will not negatively impact housing or buyers agents unless you allowed to iMessage to all homebuyers I have never as a professional real estate investor not used a buyers agent to represent me in a transaction. Even when the deal was off market, I hired an agent to represent me to make sure that all my rights were protected and that I got the best price. If you pay a bar’s agent is nothing compared to what they can get done for you as a buyer, I will never ask for a discount. I will always use the agent to go get that discount for me more importantly, or as importantly, I will always use the agent to keep the deal together. The purpose of the buyers agent is to find the right or best property in the right or best location at the right time at the best price. If you’re not using your buyer’s agent to achieve that or you’re hiring the wrong agent well, that’s on you. Hire the right agent pay them well and make them do their job. It will be well worth the money. #RealEstate #Buyers #BuyerAgent #RealEstateRuling #Commission
1:30

Real estate agent and brokers. The recent ruling in Missouri is wrong, will only benefit litigators, ambulance, tracers, and I believe will be appealed. More importantly, this ruling will not negatively impact housing or buyers agents unless you allowed to iMessage to all homebuyers I have never as a professional real estate investor not used a buyers agent to represent me in a transaction. Even when the deal was off market, I hired an agent to represent me to make sure that all my rights were protected and that I got the best price. If you pay a bar’s agent is nothing compared to what they can get done for you as a buyer, I will never ask for a discount. I will always use the agent to go get that discount for me more importantly, or as importantly, I will always use the agent to keep the deal together. The purpose of the buyers agent is to find the right or best property in the right or best location at the right time at the best price. If you’re not using your buyer’s agent to achieve that or you’re hiring the wrong agent well, that’s on you. Hire the right agent pay them well and make them do their job. It will be well worth the money. #RealEstate #Buyers #BuyerAgent #RealEstateRuling #Commission

Grant Cardone

51,494 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Real estate has a simple problem that people don’t always say out loud: it’s not designed for partial participation. You either have enough money to buy in properly, or you don’t. There’s usually no “in-between.” And once you do invest, your money is tied up for a long time. Selling isn’t instant and flexibility is limited. So even though real estate is seen as a solid way to build wealth, a lot of people are effectively locked out... not by lack of interest but by how the system is structured. That’s the gap APARTCHAIN is focused on. APARTCHAIN is a platform that turns real estate into something you can invest in fractionally. Instead of buying an entire property, the ownership is divided into digital shares (tokens), and investors can buy a portion that fits their budget. So rather than needing large capital, you’re able to take smaller positions in actual properties. Here’s how it works in practice: • APARTCHAIN acquires real estate • The property is split into multiple ownership shares • Investors buy those shares on-chain • Rental income from the property is distributed to shareholders • When the property is eventually sold, any profit is also shared So your return comes from two places: ongoing rental income and potential appreciation when the property is sold. Now, fractional real estate isn’t a brand-new idea. What makes APARTCHAIN different is how it’s positioned. It operates within Kazakhstan’s regulatory framework, with oversight connected to the country’s national financial authority. That’s a key detail because a lot of tokenization platforms operate without clear local regulation. Here, the structure is built to align with an existing legal system, not bypass it. On the technical side, it runs on a blockchain network designed for low fees and fast transactions. That means buying, holding or transferring your share doesn’t come with the heavy costs or delays typically associated with traditional property processes. There’s also no strict lock-in at the protocol level... you’re not forced to hold your position for a fixed period. But in reality, your ability to exit depends on the secondary market, which is still developing. So liquidity exists, but it’s not fully mature yet. It’s also worth being clear about the risks. Property values can go up or down. Rental income isn’t guaranteed and because this system relies on smart contracts, there’s a technical layer that traditional real estate doesn’t have. On top of that, the platform itself is still growing. Property inventory is limited for now and the resale market for shares is still building. That said, it’s not just an idea on paper... APARTCHAIN has already completed at least one full investment cycle... acquiring a property, generating returns, and exiting. That matters because it shows the model can actually function beyond theory. So at the core, this isn’t really about “changing real estate” in some dramatic way. It’s about removing the all-or-nothing barrier that’s always surrounded it. And that leaves a simple question: if you could start building exposure to real estate without needing to go all in from day one, would more people actually step in earlier or would they still wait until it feels “big enough” to matter? Superteam Kazakhstan || APARTCHAIN
0:30

Real estate has a simple problem that people don’t always say out loud: it’s not designed for partial participation. You either have enough money to buy in properly, or you don’t. There’s usually no “in-between.” And once you do invest, your money is tied up for a long time. Selling isn’t instant and flexibility is limited. So even though real estate is seen as a solid way to build wealth, a lot of people are effectively locked out... not by lack of interest but by how the system is structured. That’s the gap APARTCHAIN is focused on. APARTCHAIN is a platform that turns real estate into something you can invest in fractionally. Instead of buying an entire property, the ownership is divided into digital shares (tokens), and investors can buy a portion that fits their budget. So rather than needing large capital, you’re able to take smaller positions in actual properties. Here’s how it works in practice: • APARTCHAIN acquires real estate • The property is split into multiple ownership shares • Investors buy those shares on-chain • Rental income from the property is distributed to shareholders • When the property is eventually sold, any profit is also shared So your return comes from two places: ongoing rental income and potential appreciation when the property is sold. Now, fractional real estate isn’t a brand-new idea. What makes APARTCHAIN different is how it’s positioned. It operates within Kazakhstan’s regulatory framework, with oversight connected to the country’s national financial authority. That’s a key detail because a lot of tokenization platforms operate without clear local regulation. Here, the structure is built to align with an existing legal system, not bypass it. On the technical side, it runs on a blockchain network designed for low fees and fast transactions. That means buying, holding or transferring your share doesn’t come with the heavy costs or delays typically associated with traditional property processes. There’s also no strict lock-in at the protocol level... you’re not forced to hold your position for a fixed period. But in reality, your ability to exit depends on the secondary market, which is still developing. So liquidity exists, but it’s not fully mature yet. It’s also worth being clear about the risks. Property values can go up or down. Rental income isn’t guaranteed and because this system relies on smart contracts, there’s a technical layer that traditional real estate doesn’t have. On top of that, the platform itself is still growing. Property inventory is limited for now and the resale market for shares is still building. That said, it’s not just an idea on paper... APARTCHAIN has already completed at least one full investment cycle... acquiring a property, generating returns, and exiting. That matters because it shows the model can actually function beyond theory. So at the core, this isn’t really about “changing real estate” in some dramatic way. It’s about removing the all-or-nothing barrier that’s always surrounded it. And that leaves a simple question: if you could start building exposure to real estate without needing to go all in from day one, would more people actually step in earlier or would they still wait until it feels “big enough” to matter? Superteam Kazakhstan || APARTCHAIN

Jessica♡🛡

105,393 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад