Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Greatest hits compilation suckin off 18 dicks …volume up glory hole mayhem #straight #dl #bi #gay #porn #gloryhole #gaygloryhole
330,620 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
9 Kommentare
Scott n DCvor 2 Jahren
My fuckin hero!! Yum.
Pelle Grinovor 2 Jahren
Damn. Those are some NICE cocks too
Devonvor 2 Jahren
@Bathroom_Cruise Fuck yah, cumslut.
すけべーロイvor 2 Jahren
Why are you so hot
P. Adkinsvor 2 Jahren
Such a handsome cocksucker!
TorreyMaxvor 2 Jahren
Love It! just another Saturday afternoon at the local GH arcade. I'll be happy to fill in if you ever need a day off . . .😮🕳 🍆 💦 🤤 😋
Ronnie Angelo Jr.vor 2 Jahren
I want your life!!💦😈💦
CDLvor 2 Jahren
Beautiful Sac
Gloryholeleicsvor 2 Jahren
@Quincygloryhole 😜🥵
Ähnliche Videos
0:25
Sensitive content
Bitch, I do not play about eighth grade star aka opinions based girl….. yeah everybody’s laughing now, but it literally does not take away the fact that you are so fucking ugly like I had his ass blocked on my old account before I even saw this because every time he pops up on my for you page I just have to scroll because he’s so fucking ugly that it pisses me off he looks like he could be casted on Netflix and not in a good way. He seriously needs to find a new haircut because what the fuck is that middle part? and of course he’s a Nepo baby, and the best part is I just found out that he used to be fat, I bet he’s an anorexic asf lowkey all shade and that’s the only way his pathetic ass could lose weight and I know he didn’t use laxatives cause he’s definitely a bottom, the type that one bitch from White Lotus would say as a fem and NOT a butch. You can tell he wants to be Matthew from big mouth but he’s more of a Charlie from heartstopper, you can also tell that he’s never got his ass beat, well maybe once in middle school and then his white ass republican parents freaked the fuck out and got the kid suspended or some shit. Of course he’s obsessed with Diet Coke, he’s so obviously wants to be a white woman that it is embarrassing. Middle schoolers definitely go up to him and be like “oh my God you’re famous on TikTok” and he thinks he’s the shit but the rest of the population don’t give a fuck and the way his mom is a teacher…… I know that she probably yells at the fucking class for everything but really she’s just taking it out on these kids because she knows deep down that she wishes her son was like them instead of a fucking loser who makes strawberry bagels on TikTok not to mention everybody praised him for doing angel tree, bitch that’s nothing he probably just used some of his allowance money to look like a good person so y’all bitches would suck his dick. Omg in all of his fucking videos he tries to sound cute with that feminine ass voice and it gives me a secondhand embarrassment down. he thinks he’s Troye Sivan, but he will never admit that he probably listens to fucking country music and Taylor Swift so he can fit in with all of his Christian girl friends and that’s it. You can tell he peaked in high school. He was definitely the “token gay” and the homophobic straight boys loved him because he was “funny“ but it was all surface level, TikTok humor that seems funny to them. of course he reposted something about drinking on antidepressants. Just because you had a white claw and some lexapro(which explains why he used to be fat as fuck) doesn’t make you whatever a fucking vibe you’re trying to go for. He looks like he jerks off to the Lululemon maternity catalog while pretending he’s Harry Styles. I saw on TikTok that he has a girlfriend and I can’t tell if it’s just for attention or if he’s actually still dl so that his parents don’t freak the fuck out on him and he has to get a real job. This one girl posted him on TikTok, shaking his hips and drinking wine…… like who do you think you fucking are bro? like genuinely who the fuck do you think you are?🔑 he also reposted a TikTok about Lorde “looking a mess” I really don’t give a fuck if it was a joke. You have no place to be talking about somebody’s looks when he looks like that……. and y’all know what I mean, the type of guy who fucks all the dl in the room because he has zero confidence. The type of guy who has all the latest Apple products for no reason. I mean seriously he looks like he eats fucking rocks. Apparently he caused a lot of drama on TikTok (of course) and blamed his OCD like what kind of dumb ass excuse is that but then again he probably asked his mom what to say and then she sent him a script and he went with it. Somebody keeps on copying his videos and it’s pissing him off. I think it’s so hilarious…… you realize you’re just another copy and paste of every other wanna be “ influencer”. Don’t ever try coming for eighth grade start again.🔑🔑
Travis🦋
93,592 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten
![[ TECH EXPLANATION ] Most people think you need expensive Dolby Atmos remasters, specialized spatial file formats, or native multichannel streams to get an immersive 3D soundstage in a car 🔊 But Tesla proved that smart, in-house DSP software can do the heavy lifting—synthesizing a wide, surrounding presentation on the fly out of standard two-channel stereo 🆒 While Tesla hasn't dropped the exact secret sauce behind its audio algorithm, its descriptions and the sheer magic of the listening experience point straight to a cutting-edge, real-time primary-ambient upmixing architecture 🔥 Here's how a system like this actually works under the hood... in plain English 👇 Authored spatial audio usually requires a custom immersive mix, a specialized file format, and a matching playback engine. But since nearly everything we stream into our cars is still basic two-channel digital audio, known as PCM, Tesla takes a brilliant software-first approach: synthesizing a full 3D soundstage right inside the vehicle in real time! Once that audio stream is decoded, the car's digital signal processor (DSP) splits the signal into short, overlapping time windows and breaks each window into narrow frequency bands. So, how do DSP engineers actually pull off that kind of time-and-frequency magic? They often turn to a classic mathematical workhorse: the Short-Time Fourier Transform, or STFT. Picture shining white light through a glass prism. Instead of treating the track like one crowded beam of sound, the algorithm splits it into a vibrant rainbow of individual frequency bands, carefully examining how each band evolves from moment to moment. Across these narrow frequency tiles, the algorithm builds a dynamic, running spatial profile. It constantly measures relative volume, phase, and arrival times between the left and right channels, tracking how closely the channels match, how their levels differ, and how their phase and timing relationships shift over time. This clever analysis figures out whether sound energy hits both channels identically, like a lead singer locked dead-center, or drifts between them like natural room reflections bouncing off concert hall walls. Next up is primary-ambient extraction. This is where the engine tries to unbake the cake, estimating and separating the direct acoustic core, such as lead vocals, punchy bass, and foreground instruments, away from the surrounding ambient mist of natural room decay, reverb, and crowd noise. Instead of flipping a crude on-off switch that would butcher the track, the upmixer applies continuous soft masks. Think of these as super-responsive dimmer switches for every single frequency slice, calculating how strongly each slice contributes to the primary and ambient layers, say, an 80/20 split, to preserve the recording's natural texture. When spatial cues get muddy or ambiguous, a top-tier upmixer plays it safe, leaning back on the original stereo presentation instead of forcing sound into the surrounds. This smart fallback is a game-changer because it keeps wide panned guitars, synths, and stereo effects rock-solid so they don't wander weirdly around the cabin. Finding that room ambience is only half the battle, though. Moving it around the cabin without dragging the lead singer along with it? That's the real engineering magic. To keep everything sounding silky smooth, the algorithm applies temporal and spectral smoothing across neighboring frequencies and consecutive time frames. Think of smoothing as an acoustic shock absorber. Without it, the sound image could flutter, while isolated frequency glitches would produce artificial chirps or tinkling tones, the infamous DSP artifact known as "musical noise." Separating the layers, decorrelating the surround feeds, and carefully aligning the speakers helps tame comb filtering and unstable imaging. When identical sound waves hit your ears from different speakers with microsecond delays, the waves collide like conflicting ripples in a pool, causing some frequencies to reinforce while others cancel out. That phase interference can make the audio sound thin, hollow, and tinny, like you're listening inside a metal pipe. For the primary sound layer, the engineering goal is a sharply defined front soundstage. The system locks center-panned vocals right onto the physical center speaker while preserving the wide stereo spread of side instruments, creating a stable soundstage over the hood that stays convincing whether you're in the driver or passenger seat. Simultaneously, the extracted ambient layer goes through decorrelation before hitting the available side, overhead, and rear speakers, depending on your vehicle model. By subtly shifting phase and timing between surround channels, the algorithm keeps the feeds from behaving like identical copies, spreading the ambience effortlessly through space. Suddenly, the physical boundaries of the cabin seem to melt away into thin air instead of feeling like isolated speaker boxes firing straight at your ears! On hardware platforms like the Model Y L, this spatial engine leverages dedicated hardware provisions, including center speakers positioned right beneath the second-row display. This gives rear passengers their own local anchor for the soundstage rather than making them settle for leftover reflections. That Immersive Sound slider in your settings? It likely adjusts how strongly the extracted ambience surrounds you, fine-tuning its level, width, and spread through the cabin. In Auto mode, Tesla's system dynamically adapts to whatever you queue up: spoken-word material like podcasts stays clean and centered for maximum voice clarity, while spacious acoustic recordings expand into a full, surrounding presentation. As all this extracted audio spreads across the cabin's speaker array, the renderer also relies on smart gain management. This ensures that opening up the surround channels doesn't trigger an unwanted loudness jump or overload your amplifier headroom. Now comes the ultimate physical challenge: a car cabin is a notoriously tricky place to build a convincing soundstage. The "room" being extracted here belongs strictly to the recording, whether a live concert venue or studio reverb. The car's internal reflections are an entirely separate problem, solved by smart speaker layout and cabin tuning. From there, the separated channels run through a custom acoustic profile built specifically for your vehicle model. The car doesn't need to re-measure the cabin on the fly because it relies on factory-tuned time delays, EQ curves, crossovers, limiters, and driver protection calibrated to the interior geometry and reflective glass. Because deep bass is difficult to localize and demands serious speaker cone movement, the DSP filters those ultra-low frequencies out of the smaller speakers and routes them straight to the vehicle's subwoofer system. This reduces distortion, sharpens clarity, and keeps those smaller drivers safe from blowing out. Because all of this upmixing happens locally on decoded PCM audio, you don't even need a dedicated Dolby Atmos master, a Sony 360 Reality Audio mix, or a native multichannel stream. Tesla can build a full, 360-degree soundstage on the fly out of basic stereo tracks from streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music! For Tesla owners, the real payoff is not just the clever math under the hood, but how it transforms every single drive. Long road trips fly by when your cabin feels like a world-class studio, and familiar songs you have listened to a hundred times suddenly reveal subtle room details and spatial cues you never noticed before. It gives you a reason to sit in the driveway just to finish one more track.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2102327128427843974/amplify_video_thumb/2102327085310353408/img/27TGg8Eq0dM0_FUK.jpg)
!["Triangles are a result of reverse engineering and sometimes piloted by 'them' and other times piloted by 'us AND them.'" 👽🤝👨🏻 Agreements, and Humans Working Alongside Non-Humans? 🛸▽👽 (This is relatively interesting, and I think you guys are going to like it. It's a little bit long. First, Matt on with Jesse and the clip below.) Matthew Brown (Matthew): "At this point in time, it's possible that, you know, the United States and others have some sort of derivative technology that looks like the big, black triangle, right? There's that famous NIDS study done in the, I think, late '90s or early 2000s where they correlate triangle sightings to naval bases in the United States." ~Lacatski!~ (I can't write about triangles without including the words of Dr. James Lacatski on Weaponized, with George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell. Lacatski ran the AAWSAP UFO program for the DIA.) Corbell: "We hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP, to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." ~D'Amato~ Dick D'Amato was a longtime (18 years) senior staffer for Senate Democratic Leader Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia.) "Dick D'Amato has returned from Belgium where he met with Colonel De Brouwer, a 'very interesting fellow.' Dick’s conclusion, again, is that the triangular objects are very plain human craft. ~Jacques Vallée's Forbidden Science Volume 4 - November 1992 ~ Brown: "So either, what's going on is, you know, there's some sort of recurring exchange or...and use of our facilities by whatever is piloting these big black triangles. Or, we have some sort of derivative technology ourselves that operate from these bases. "Jeff Nuccetelli (Jeff Nuccetelli) also described, you know, a big , black triangle coming out of the Pacific Ocean, flying into Vandenberg, basically hovering over the runway at Vandenberg Air Force Base and then disappearing." ~ Nuccetelli at the Congressional Hearing: "I talked to five shaken witnesses who described a massive triangular craft, larger than a football field, that hovered silently for about 45 seconds over their entry-control point before shooting away at impossible speed." ~ Jesse Michels - Jesse Michels: "Dylan Borland, also at Langley in 2012." Brown: "Exactly." ~ Dylan Borland at the Congressional Hearing: "At approximately 01 30, I saw an, approximately, 100-foot equilateral triangle take off from near the NASA hangar on the base." ~ Michels: "He sees this triangular craft, seemingly, kind of come out of, or maybe it was hovering around a NASA hangar at the Air Force base, and then it flies at his head. And then it flies off." ~My Tweet from October 2025~~~ Daniel Gockerell on Weaponized, and My Comments 2006, Eglin AFB... Murgia 2025: "This sounds similar to what Dylan Borland says he saw at Langley AFB. If this stuff is so secret, why do they seem so lax in allowing others, who are not cleared, to see it? "If this craft exists... "Is it ours, that we developed own our own? "Is it craft that we constructed and reverse engineered, based, in part, on technology of unknown origin that we have acquired? "Is it a craft of unknown origin that we acquired and learned how to fly? "Are 'they' working with us and showing us how to fly 'their' craft?" ~ Daniel Gockerell: "I step outside, and I look to my left...and I see hovering, about 15 to 20 feet off the ground, this giant, maybe 300 or so feet in length (size of a football field. ~Joe), aircraft. "This just goes straight up and it's dead quiet, nothing, not a sound. I could hear the buzzing from the generator lights, right? So, this gets about to the canopy, like, height, a little over the canopy, and does a slight bank, and takes off. "This aircraft, when it banks, I can see that it's a perfect triangle, and it's gigantic, and it has a white light at each apex of the triangle and a large, white light in the center. And it takes off, and it zips out of sight. I mean, Mach something we don't know." Full transcript and video clip... ~End Gockerell Transcript~ (And let's not forgot my friend, Michael Via, who says he saw a "majestic," silent black triangle in 1992 in the Persian Gulf. Watch him talk about it here. ⬇️) ~ Brown: "Yeah, I'd be pretty freaked out if that happened to me. Yeah, so, you know, these are all examples of the United States having some sort of relationship with these craft, whether it's our own, gifted tech, or truly a third party, can only speculate. But, you know, I have some good guesses." Michels: "What's your best guess?" Brown: "That there is an exchange or some sort of arrangement with whatever is piloting the black triangles that are not ours? I believe we do have a derivative version at this point, but that is, again, derived from the real thing. And the real thing, there is some sort of ongoing contact and communication, clearly, not just the United States, but other governments as well. That's my opinion." (An agreement between some aspect of our government and an anomalous intelligence that flies the triangles that are NOT our reverse engineered craft? Are there multiple governments in contact with a non-human intelligence and working side-by-side with "them"?) Michels: "And when it flies in the vicinity, there's like, some sort of download that occurs. There's like a transmission of information." Brown: "That's what some people have reported. Again, I did not come across official information. Well, I did not come across information on that in the Immaculate-Constellation briefing." (In other words, Brown is suggesting that he may have come across information about that from sources other than the Immaculate Constellation files.) Michels: "Okay, all right. We'll read between the lines there." ~ (Murgia 2026: Now the interesting part. Does anybody remember when I shared this from Jeremy McGowan? I have posts about it that go back to 2021. This one is from 2024 and I edited it very lightly for grammar and clarity.) Murgia 2024: "A few years ago, in some private group, [Jeremy McGowan] said he was at Lue's place in Wyoming. "Someone shared his comments with me and here they are..." McGowan: "From Lue's mouth to my face while I was at his place for a week back in January [of 2021]. Lue (allegedly): "We know who's in the saucers. We know who is in the triangles. We don't have a clue who is in the Tic Tacs." (I asked a source about that and they said the information (in those three sentences) was accurate. But there's no evidence to back it up so, as with everything here, remain skeptical. More on what Lue allegedly told McGowan in 2021... 👇🏼 ) Q from a Group DM: "So saucers and triangles are terrestrial and Tic Tac aren't?" McGowan: "Not exactly. Saucers are 'ultra-terrestrial.' Triangles are a result of reverse engineering and sometimes piloted by 'them' and other times piloted by 'us AND them.' And the Tic Tacs are a complete enigma." ~ Murgia 2024: "Are triangular UFOs sometimes piloted by us and them, with them being NHI? Do some NHI work alongside us in classified programs? I don't know." ~End 2024 Tweet~ (Murgia 2026: That source who told me those first three sentences were accurate? They backed down from that a year or so later. Did they misunderstand what I was originally asking? Or, did they realize they shouldn't have shared that with me because it was "sensitive" and they wanted to do some damage control? I don't know. I also put out a long tweet a few years ago about OG remote viewer, Lyn Buchanan, talking about seeing what he thought were non-humans working alongside humans.) Buchanan: "I'm 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔 that I have seen extraterrestrials working 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ humans in black op areas. In human, black op areas." You can read the full post here: ~ (Murgia 2026: Here are the names of folks who have spoken about possible agreements between human governments and a non-human intelligence, and/or...Us working with "Them." David Grusch Lue Elizondo (allegedly, since it's second hand) Dylan Borland Matthew Brown Lenval Logan - Try.ThePhenom.App (A month or so ago, on a podcast, he said someone told him to look into "agreements," but he didn't say who told him.) Lyn Buchanan And, a contact of mine who brought it up out of the blue a few months ago. It caught me off guard. 👀 Several years ago, in an interview with Project Unity, Sean Cahill (who was there when McGowan spent time at Lue's in 2021) was asked about the "we-know-who's-in-the-saucers" claim. He said, "That's bullsh*t... That is the outline of a fiction story." I'm not so sure. One more thing: I asked Lue about it when he did a Clubhouse event in July of 2021.) Murgia: "If we believe that the Mussolini craft retrieval took place, we may have data from 90 years ago, all the way until now. Is it valid speculation that we know who's inside of some of these craft? And I know you may not be able to answer that. But if this information is classified, like, who's in the saucers, who's inside the triangles, why would that be classified? It's not sources and methods." Lue: "Exactly right. That's my concern. You can only classify information to protect sources and methods, and you cannot...it's illegal to classify information just because something is embarrassing." (I tried again. 🙂) Murgia: "Do we have any idea who's inside some of these craft?" Lue: "Uhh, you know, I prefer not to answer that question right now simply because, umm, I don't have a good response for that. I think we've got a lot of ideas, and I think there's a lot of anecdotal information out there, but at the end of the day, we still don't know entirely what we're dealing with and that's problematic." (We'd all like to know how Brown and the others came to form these opinions about Us and "Them." Did the alleged comments from Lue in 2021 have anything to do with it? Did any of them read about that? Is any of this true? Again, I don't know. But if it IS, I'd say it would constitute a BOMBSHELL. And I rarely use that (overused) word.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2094684600530612451/amplify_video_thumb/2094612914275807232/img/ZFaAC5u3EJ3TN779.jpg)
