Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Greene Co, TN 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝟵𝟴𝟴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 “This is why ppl die. Highway 93 fall branch. Greene county line. It’s foggy. That’s a double yellow line. Shame on this car.”

Scannerfood

21,288 subscribers

45,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Miss You Dad

Miss You Dadvor 1 Jahr

Here in Johnson County I've lost count of how many times this has happened.

Profilbild von Brian

Brianvor 1 Jahr

Don’t visit WV then if this is an issue for you. This is a necessary way of life in southern West Virginia.

Profilbild von Hillbilly5bravo

Hillbilly5bravovor 1 Jahr

Fuck off, bootlicker.

Profilbild von Chris 🍊⚜️

Chris 🍊⚜️vor 1 Jahr

Truck driver here. You’d be amazed what four wheelers will do just to end up beside you at the next red light.

Profilbild von Allen Hawkins

Allen Hawkinsvor 1 Jahr

Everyday occurrence in east Tennessee,it's a dam mess.

Profilbild von TN Vaper

TN Vapervor 1 Jahr

Move or get out the way

Profilbild von Jeremy Winegar

Jeremy Winegarvor 1 Jahr

I quit going down 93 just for this same reason

Profilbild von TN Vaper

TN Vapervor 1 Jahr

We ain't got time to be waiting around on yall

Profilbild von Dork Slayer

Dork Slayervor 1 Jahr

I live pretty close to where this video was taken and this kinda thing happens a lot.

Profilbild von Renae Cox

Renae Coxvor 1 Jahr

This happens all the time 😡

Ähnliche Videos

Gridlock this morning on I81 in Sullivan County, Tn - trucks using shoulders blocked all highway trucks and responders as roads flash froze. TDOT reporting roads refreezing and becoming very slick at time of post.

Gridlock this morning on I81 in Sullivan County, Tn - trucks using shoulders blocked all highway trucks and responders as roads flash froze. TDOT reporting roads refreezing and becoming very slick at time of post.

Scannerfood

26,306 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Why is there a line of LITERALLY over a 100 cop cars with their lights on going up highway 6 in Spanish Fork?! It’s gotta be every cop in Utah County. They’re all flying like this is a warzone. This has literally been going on for 10 minutes straight.

Why is there a line of LITERALLY over a 100 cop cars with their lights on going up highway 6 in Spanish Fork?! It’s gotta be every cop in Utah County. They’re all flying like this is a warzone. This has literally been going on for 10 minutes straight.

Nate

52,799 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$This use to be a corn field, on corby bridge rd in Chuckey, TN \south central area$

This use to be a corn field, on corby bridge rd in Chuckey, TN \south central area

Scannerfood

450,928 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 MTG just broke ranks on the Epstein files: “I can’t conclusively say if that’s why the House isn’t in session… but the House should be in session. There is a new Democrat that’s been elected that does deserve to be sworn in… If it’s to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That’s going to have 218 signatures.” Even Marjorie Taylor Greene knows the GOP stonewall is unsustainable. Swear in Grijalva. Release the files. Let the votes fall where they may.

🚨 MTG just broke ranks on the Epstein files: “I can’t conclusively say if that’s why the House isn’t in session… but the House should be in session. There is a new Democrat that’s been elected that does deserve to be sworn in… If it’s to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That’s going to have 218 signatures.” Even Marjorie Taylor Greene knows the GOP stonewall is unsustainable. Swear in Grijalva. Release the files. Let the votes fall where they may.

Brian Allen

276,081 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jonesborough, Tn by crossroads gas station Hwy 81s river is floating houses and cars through the tomato fields some houses completely under water search and rescue teams are down here

Jonesborough, Tn by crossroads gas station Hwy 81s river is floating houses and cars through the tomato fields some houses completely under water search and rescue teams are down here

Scannerfood

1,030,751 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A referendum on separation from Canada will drive jobs and investment out of Saskatchewan, even if it’s unsuccessful – just look at what happened to Quebec. I heard that loud and clear in my meetings with energy leaders this week. That’s why, today, I introduced Bill 604 — the Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act. If passed, this critical legislation will: ➡️ Double the threshold for citizen petitions on separation referendums — from 15 per cent to 30 per cent of eligible voters. ➡️ It would also remove the ability of the Sask. Party Government to unilaterally hold a referendum on separation without broad support. This legislation is designed to provide long-term stability for workers, businesses, and investors at a time of tariffs and renewed uncertainty over Donald Trump’s threats toward Canadian sovereignty. Friends, this is such a critical moment and we have an opportunity to bring Canada together and get generational projects over the line — more rail lines, pipelines and power lines. Canada is 1st. Never 51st.

A referendum on separation from Canada will drive jobs and investment out of Saskatchewan, even if it’s unsuccessful – just look at what happened to Quebec. I heard that loud and clear in my meetings with energy leaders this week. That’s why, today, I introduced Bill 604 — the Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act. If passed, this critical legislation will: ➡️ Double the threshold for citizen petitions on separation referendums — from 15 per cent to 30 per cent of eligible voters. ➡️ It would also remove the ability of the Sask. Party Government to unilaterally hold a referendum on separation without broad support. This legislation is designed to provide long-term stability for workers, businesses, and investors at a time of tariffs and renewed uncertainty over Donald Trump’s threats toward Canadian sovereignty. Friends, this is such a critical moment and we have an opportunity to bring Canada together and get generational projects over the line — more rail lines, pipelines and power lines. Canada is 1st. Never 51st.

Carla Beck

101,371 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In China, people are asking: Why does the “freest” country in the world produce so many silent tragedies? Why are programmers with $450k salaries dying homeless in the cold? Why do small accidents become death sentences in America? It’s called the American Kill Line. Originating from gaming, “kill line” means instant death when your health drops below a threshold. In the U.S., this term now refers to a cruel societal reality: 💥 Fall behind on rent → Lose your job → Lose your home → Die in silence. The ALICE threshold defines this: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. That’s 37% of Americans. One ambulance bill, one missed paycheck, and you’re out. Capitalism doesn’t save lives. It protects assets. And here lies the paradox: When Americans suffer injustice, they rarely organize against the system, but when their empire wages war, they cheer. Because in America, war is not horror. War is therapy. So while China builds railways, the U.S. builds narratives: 🩺 Poor people “didn’t work hard enough.” 🏚️ Homeless people “chose that life.” 🇻🇪 And foreign leaders are “tyrants” who must be removed... for freedom, of course. Venezuela is not about Maduro, it’s about America needing someone to punish so that millions don’t question the real enemy within. Export the pain, externalize the blame, that’s how imperial peace is maintained. You want to know what truly threatens the U.S. government? It’s not China, not Russia, it’s a mirror. A mirror that reflects back every eviction, every overdose, every child who dies because insulin costs more than food. When your democracy can’t stop people from falling, and your capitalism can’t help them stand again, you only have one thing left: Bomb someone poorer, then call it justice.

In China, people are asking: Why does the “freest” country in the world produce so many silent tragedies? Why are programmers with $450k salaries dying homeless in the cold? Why do small accidents become death sentences in America? It’s called the American Kill Line. Originating from gaming, “kill line” means instant death when your health drops below a threshold. In the U.S., this term now refers to a cruel societal reality: 💥 Fall behind on rent → Lose your job → Lose your home → Die in silence. The ALICE threshold defines this: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. That’s 37% of Americans. One ambulance bill, one missed paycheck, and you’re out. Capitalism doesn’t save lives. It protects assets. And here lies the paradox: When Americans suffer injustice, they rarely organize against the system, but when their empire wages war, they cheer. Because in America, war is not horror. War is therapy. So while China builds railways, the U.S. builds narratives: 🩺 Poor people “didn’t work hard enough.” 🏚️ Homeless people “chose that life.” 🇻🇪 And foreign leaders are “tyrants” who must be removed... for freedom, of course. Venezuela is not about Maduro, it’s about America needing someone to punish so that millions don’t question the real enemy within. Export the pain, externalize the blame, that’s how imperial peace is maintained. You want to know what truly threatens the U.S. government? It’s not China, not Russia, it’s a mirror. A mirror that reflects back every eviction, every overdose, every child who dies because insulin costs more than food. When your democracy can’t stop people from falling, and your capitalism can’t help them stand again, you only have one thing left: Bomb someone poorer, then call it justice.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

346,903 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Now THIS is what I’m talkin’ about! . President Trump just dropped one of the best proposals I’ve heard in a LONG time—eliminating capital gains tax on your primary residence. Makes me want to shout HALLELUJAH from the rooftop! . Right now, sellers are capped at $250K (single) or $500K (married) in capital gains exemptions—y’all, that hasn’t been touched since the 90s, like frosted tips and Blockbuster! It NEVER got adjusted for inflation. . So now, folks are sitting on equity like it’s hot coals—afraid to move, sell, or do anything—because Uncle Sam wants a bite of money they ALREADY PAID TAXES ON. Just outdated policy that’s been keeping people stuck and their equity hostage. . You want to fix the housing market? Quit punishing people for building wealth and give them a reason to MOVE. That equity gets reinvested—new homes, new builds, new LIFE in this economy. . And don’t even get me started on the double taxation—you paid taxes on that income before you ever bought the house! . They’ve paid property taxes, weathered recessions, maintained their homes, and invested in their communities for decades. Why in the world should they be penalized for wanting to access the equity they built? . Here’s the bottom line: ✅ It’s double taxation ✅ It’s holding back housing supply ✅ And it’s time to let folks reinvest that money in new homes and new opportunities. . 🏛 So, Congress—wake up and CODIFY this! Let’s make sure this gets across the finish line. . Protect property owners. Unlock housing. Support the American Dream. Do something that helps the taxpayers for a change! We’re watching. . Please *SHARE* if you agree and tag your reps—this is the kind of smart policy we NEED. #taxationistheft Donald J. Trump

Now THIS is what I’m talkin’ about! . President Trump just dropped one of the best proposals I’ve heard in a LONG time—eliminating capital gains tax on your primary residence. Makes me want to shout HALLELUJAH from the rooftop! . Right now, sellers are capped at $250K (single) or $500K (married) in capital gains exemptions—y’all, that hasn’t been touched since the 90s, like frosted tips and Blockbuster! It NEVER got adjusted for inflation. . So now, folks are sitting on equity like it’s hot coals—afraid to move, sell, or do anything—because Uncle Sam wants a bite of money they ALREADY PAID TAXES ON. Just outdated policy that’s been keeping people stuck and their equity hostage. . You want to fix the housing market? Quit punishing people for building wealth and give them a reason to MOVE. That equity gets reinvested—new homes, new builds, new LIFE in this economy. . And don’t even get me started on the double taxation—you paid taxes on that income before you ever bought the house! . They’ve paid property taxes, weathered recessions, maintained their homes, and invested in their communities for decades. Why in the world should they be penalized for wanting to access the equity they built? . Here’s the bottom line: ✅ It’s double taxation ✅ It’s holding back housing supply ✅ And it’s time to let folks reinvest that money in new homes and new opportunities. . 🏛 So, Congress—wake up and CODIFY this! Let’s make sure this gets across the finish line. . Protect property owners. Unlock housing. Support the American Dream. Do something that helps the taxpayers for a change! We’re watching. . Please SHARE if you agree and tag your reps—this is the kind of smart policy we NEED. #taxationistheft Donald J. Trump

Leigh Thomas Brown🇺🇸

196,495 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Watch how Charlie Kirk engages with a college liberal who says life begins when a baby exits the mother’s womb. He didn’t yell. He didn’t call her names. Instead, he asked her a series of critical questions until her argument completely fell apart. KIRK: “We know deep down it’s wrong to murder a baby.” STUDENT: “You’re not murdering a baby. It’s not a baby.” KIRK: “What is it then?” STUDENT: “It is an embryo, which is not a baby.” KIRK: “So at what point does it become a baby?” STUDENT: “When it is born.” [Crowd groans] STUDENT: “I don’t agree with abortions up to full-term abortions.” KIRK: “Hold on. But you said it becomes a baby when it’s born. Then why would you have abortion limits before it’s born? I thought it’s just an embryo. So embryo rights?” STUDENT: “No, embryo rights aren’t a thing.” KIRK: “But then where would you draw a line for abortion then? And why? And under what moral standard?” STUDENT: “There are medical reasons.” KIRK: “No, that’s not the question.” STUDENT: “You just asked me why would I not have an abortion full term. For medical reasons.” KIRK: “Okay, so at 29 weeks, the baby is nearly fully developed, can recognize the mother’s voice, has a heartbeat, has brainwaves. Is it okay to abort that baby?” STUDENT: “It’s not okay… I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. It’s not okay to have an abortion ever? How about like three weeks in?” KIRK: “Correct. No abortion. Correct.” STUDENT: “Why?” KIRK: “Well, because your life started at conception.” STUDENT: “It did not, though.” KIRK: “Well, hold on. So let’s play this out. So who are you as an individual? From your skin color to your eye color, to your likes, your dislikes, from your temperament to your everything.” STUDENT: “I am not an embryo. I’m a person.” KIRK: “Hold on a second. But it started with something called deoxyribonucleic acid. And your own individual DNA started at the point of egg and sperm meeting. That’s where your journey started. And so from that point in particular, life begins not at birth, not at first words, not at first steps, but when your DNA [developed], which is who you actually are… That doesn’t happen at eight weeks or 10 weeks. It happens at conception.” STUDENT: “What happens if you need a medical abortion? If the mother will die if she does not get an abortion? What’s your stance on that?” KIRK: “The only place where medical abortion is necessary is before 20 weeks, which is incredibly rare.” STUDENT: “What if she will die? What if the mother will die?” KIRK: “This is a very important question. Let’s say it’s 27 weeks, okay? And the mother will die… Why don’t we just have the baby delivered by cesarean section? You know what a cesarean section is, right?” STUDENT: “A C-section.” KIRK: “Why wouldn’t we just put the baby up by C-section instead of terminating it?” STUDENT: “Because if the mother will die, it’s not safe to do that.” KIRK: “But it’s actually safer than an abortion. So every time they say… ‘Oh, you need to have abortion for medical reasons.’ Respond, ‘then have a C-section.’” STUDENT: “What if you’re not able to have a C-section? What if you are on your deathbed? You need to have an abortion right now?” KIRK: “First and foremost, C-section is safer, C-section is quicker. And a C-section saves both lives.” [Crowd erupts]

Watch how Charlie Kirk engages with a college liberal who says life begins when a baby exits the mother’s womb. He didn’t yell. He didn’t call her names. Instead, he asked her a series of critical questions until her argument completely fell apart. KIRK: “We know deep down it’s wrong to murder a baby.” STUDENT: “You’re not murdering a baby. It’s not a baby.” KIRK: “What is it then?” STUDENT: “It is an embryo, which is not a baby.” KIRK: “So at what point does it become a baby?” STUDENT: “When it is born.” [Crowd groans] STUDENT: “I don’t agree with abortions up to full-term abortions.” KIRK: “Hold on. But you said it becomes a baby when it’s born. Then why would you have abortion limits before it’s born? I thought it’s just an embryo. So embryo rights?” STUDENT: “No, embryo rights aren’t a thing.” KIRK: “But then where would you draw a line for abortion then? And why? And under what moral standard?” STUDENT: “There are medical reasons.” KIRK: “No, that’s not the question.” STUDENT: “You just asked me why would I not have an abortion full term. For medical reasons.” KIRK: “Okay, so at 29 weeks, the baby is nearly fully developed, can recognize the mother’s voice, has a heartbeat, has brainwaves. Is it okay to abort that baby?” STUDENT: “It’s not okay… I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. It’s not okay to have an abortion ever? How about like three weeks in?” KIRK: “Correct. No abortion. Correct.” STUDENT: “Why?” KIRK: “Well, because your life started at conception.” STUDENT: “It did not, though.” KIRK: “Well, hold on. So let’s play this out. So who are you as an individual? From your skin color to your eye color, to your likes, your dislikes, from your temperament to your everything.” STUDENT: “I am not an embryo. I’m a person.” KIRK: “Hold on a second. But it started with something called deoxyribonucleic acid. And your own individual DNA started at the point of egg and sperm meeting. That’s where your journey started. And so from that point in particular, life begins not at birth, not at first words, not at first steps, but when your DNA [developed], which is who you actually are… That doesn’t happen at eight weeks or 10 weeks. It happens at conception.” STUDENT: “What happens if you need a medical abortion? If the mother will die if she does not get an abortion? What’s your stance on that?” KIRK: “The only place where medical abortion is necessary is before 20 weeks, which is incredibly rare.” STUDENT: “What if she will die? What if the mother will die?” KIRK: “This is a very important question. Let’s say it’s 27 weeks, okay? And the mother will die… Why don’t we just have the baby delivered by cesarean section? You know what a cesarean section is, right?” STUDENT: “A C-section.” KIRK: “Why wouldn’t we just put the baby up by C-section instead of terminating it?” STUDENT: “Because if the mother will die, it’s not safe to do that.” KIRK: “But it’s actually safer than an abortion. So every time they say… ‘Oh, you need to have abortion for medical reasons.’ Respond, ‘then have a C-section.’” STUDENT: “What if you’re not able to have a C-section? What if you are on your deathbed? You need to have an abortion right now?” KIRK: “First and foremost, C-section is safer, C-section is quicker. And a C-section saves both lives.” [Crowd erupts]

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

150,155 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

If J7 sent Baker something that sounded like she might actually do it, taking it seriously is the only decent option. taking it seriously is the only non-asshole move. That’s not “watching over her.” That’s not being a creep. That’s not turning on a friend. That’s not doing the thing Jess would have crucified him for not doing. That’s the whole point. Jess doesn’t get to invent the rule after the fact. She doesn’t get to say Baker was wrong for treating a concerning message like a concerning message, then pretend she’d have praised him if he’d ignored it. If he’d shrugged and something happened, she’d be first in line calling him heartless. You already know that. Everyone watching this already knows that. So this isn’t about J7. If it were, the question would be simple: did he take a possible crisis seriously, or did he blow it off? He took it seriously. That’s the part Jess can’t stand, because it doesn’t fit the story she needs. The story needs Baker as the guy who used J7, discarded J7, or failed J7. Not the guy who actually paid attention when it counted. That’s why “stop watching him” is so gross. It’s not a safety argument. It’s not a loyalty argument. It’s an audience-control argument. Don’t look at the receipts. Don’t notice the double standard. Don’t ask what she’d have said if he’d done the opposite. Just leave, so the narrative doesn’t have to compete with reality. Baker didn’t turn people against J7 by taking her seriously. Jess is turning people against Baker for the crime of not playing along. Telling people to stop watching is the tell. When the argument stops being “here’s what happened” and becomes “don’t look at the other guy,” it’s not about J7 anymore. It’s about controlling the room. That’s the ugly part. Not the concern. The rewrite.

If J7 sent Baker something that sounded like she might actually do it, taking it seriously is the only decent option. taking it seriously is the only non-asshole move. That’s not “watching over her.” That’s not being a creep. That’s not turning on a friend. That’s not doing the thing Jess would have crucified him for not doing. That’s the whole point. Jess doesn’t get to invent the rule after the fact. She doesn’t get to say Baker was wrong for treating a concerning message like a concerning message, then pretend she’d have praised him if he’d ignored it. If he’d shrugged and something happened, she’d be first in line calling him heartless. You already know that. Everyone watching this already knows that. So this isn’t about J7. If it were, the question would be simple: did he take a possible crisis seriously, or did he blow it off? He took it seriously. That’s the part Jess can’t stand, because it doesn’t fit the story she needs. The story needs Baker as the guy who used J7, discarded J7, or failed J7. Not the guy who actually paid attention when it counted. That’s why “stop watching him” is so gross. It’s not a safety argument. It’s not a loyalty argument. It’s an audience-control argument. Don’t look at the receipts. Don’t notice the double standard. Don’t ask what she’d have said if he’d done the opposite. Just leave, so the narrative doesn’t have to compete with reality. Baker didn’t turn people against J7 by taking her seriously. Jess is turning people against Baker for the crime of not playing along. Telling people to stop watching is the tell. When the argument stops being “here’s what happened” and becomes “don’t look at the other guy,” it’s not about J7 anymore. It’s about controlling the room. That’s the ugly part. Not the concern. The rewrite.

Daisy

14,336 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

The Curious Case of the Barrister, the Bomb, the Museum and MI5 This story raises more questions the deeper you look. A 25 year old trainee barrister spends two years in war-torn Syria, comes home, then is allegedly caught transporting a Semtex car bomb complete with a detonator and timer. We’re told she didn’t know what she was carrying. She gets bail. We’re also told MI5 and Special Branch knew about the alleged bomb plot for two months. If that’s true, why was a live device allowed to be collected in Phoenix Park and transported up the N2 through public roads before the car was finally stopped at a petrol station in Carrickmacross? Then there’s the second arrest. Simon O’Donovan appears before Ireland’s three-judge, non-jury Special Criminal Court and is refused bail. Prosecutors allege explosives were stored at Collins Barracks……a government-owned museum where he worked. So which is it? Was this such a serious national security threat that it required the Special Criminal Court or was is something worthy of granting bail? The official line is that the intended target was a police officer in Derry. Maybe it was. But given the current political tensions, the growing split within republicanism and the fact that intelligence agencies reportedly knew about the operation well in advance, it’s understandable that people are asking whether the public is being told the full story. Questioning an official narrative isn’t extremism. It’s what people do when the facts presented raise more questions than they answer.

The Curious Case of the Barrister, the Bomb, the Museum and MI5 This story raises more questions the deeper you look. A 25 year old trainee barrister spends two years in war-torn Syria, comes home, then is allegedly caught transporting a Semtex car bomb complete with a detonator and timer. We’re told she didn’t know what she was carrying. She gets bail. We’re also told MI5 and Special Branch knew about the alleged bomb plot for two months. If that’s true, why was a live device allowed to be collected in Phoenix Park and transported up the N2 through public roads before the car was finally stopped at a petrol station in Carrickmacross? Then there’s the second arrest. Simon O’Donovan appears before Ireland’s three-judge, non-jury Special Criminal Court and is refused bail. Prosecutors allege explosives were stored at Collins Barracks……a government-owned museum where he worked. So which is it? Was this such a serious national security threat that it required the Special Criminal Court or was is something worthy of granting bail? The official line is that the intended target was a police officer in Derry. Maybe it was. But given the current political tensions, the growing split within republicanism and the fact that intelligence agencies reportedly knew about the operation well in advance, it’s understandable that people are asking whether the public is being told the full story. Questioning an official narrative isn’t extremism. It’s what people do when the facts presented raise more questions than they answer.

Melissa Ciummei

95,655 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang K*LLED two elderly people last year... ...was caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were k*lled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang KLLED two elderly people last year... ...was caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were klled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

Matt Van Swol

451,935 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang K*LLED two elderly people last year... ...was just caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were k*lled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang KLLED two elderly people last year... ...was just caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were klled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

John F. Kennedy Jr Q

21,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang K*LLED two elderly people last year... ...was just caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were k*lled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in Florida after a 19-year-old whose speeding Mustang KLLED two elderly people last year... ...was just caught doing 120 to 130 MPH, running stop signs, and turning off his headlights to escape cops... ...ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE. AND HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. His name is Denis Maldonado-Reyes, he's 19 years old, in Apopka, Florida. Back in November, troopers say he was driving 90 miles per hour in a 45 zone. Double the limit. His Ford Mustang plowed into the side of a LYNX transit van as it turned. Two people inside that van were klled. Jerry Earl, 81 years old. Aida Maldonado, 94 years old. He tried to blame the VAN. Nearly a YEAR later, that fatal case still hasn't been resolved. He pleaded not guilty and he's been walking free the entire time. And what did he do with that freedom? Late last month, a deputy saw his Mustang blow through a four-way stop. Pass a car over a double yellow line. Then TURN OFF HIS HEADLIGHTS in the dark to try to disappear. The chase hit 130mph. And he was doing it all on a SUSPENDED LICENSE. Suspended because he never paid a ticket for illegally blowing past a stopped SCHOOL BUS. WHY IS HE WALKING FREE????????? WE. DO. NOT. HAVE. TO. LIVE. LIKE. THIS.

Matt Van Swol

1,113,850 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat