正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Greene Co, TN 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝟵𝟴𝟴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 “This is why ppl die. Highway 93 fall branch. Greene county line. It’s foggy. That’s a double yellow line. Shame on this car.”

Scannerfood

21,288 subscribers

45,796 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Miss You Dad 的头像

Miss You Dad1 年前

Here in Johnson County I've lost count of how many times this has happened.

Brian 的头像

Brian1 年前

Don’t visit WV then if this is an issue for you. This is a necessary way of life in southern West Virginia.

Hillbilly5bravo 的头像

Hillbilly5bravo1 年前

Fuck off, bootlicker.

Chris 🍊⚜️ 的头像

Chris 🍊⚜️1 年前

Truck driver here. You’d be amazed what four wheelers will do just to end up beside you at the next red light.

Allen Hawkins 的头像

Allen Hawkins1 年前

Everyday occurrence in east Tennessee,it's a dam mess.

TN Vaper 的头像

TN Vaper1 年前

Move or get out the way

Jeremy Winegar 的头像

Jeremy Winegar1 年前

I quit going down 93 just for this same reason

TN Vaper 的头像

TN Vaper1 年前

We ain't got time to be waiting around on yall

Dork Slayer 的头像

Dork Slayer1 年前

I live pretty close to where this video was taken and this kinda thing happens a lot.

Renae Cox 的头像

Renae Cox1 年前

This happens all the time 😡

相关视频

Gridlock this morning on I81 in Sullivan County, Tn - trucks using shoulders blocked all highway trucks and responders as roads flash froze. TDOT reporting roads refreezing and becoming very slick at time of post.

Gridlock this morning on I81 in Sullivan County, Tn - trucks using shoulders blocked all highway trucks and responders as roads flash froze. TDOT reporting roads refreezing and becoming very slick at time of post.

Scannerfood

26,306 次观看 • 6 个月前

Why is there a line of LITERALLY over a 100 cop cars with their lights on going up highway 6 in Spanish Fork?! It’s gotta be every cop in Utah County. They’re all flying like this is a warzone. This has literally been going on for 10 minutes straight.

Why is there a line of LITERALLY over a 100 cop cars with their lights on going up highway 6 in Spanish Fork?! It’s gotta be every cop in Utah County. They’re all flying like this is a warzone. This has literally been going on for 10 minutes straight.

Nate

52,799 次观看 • 1 年前

$This use to be a corn field, on corby bridge rd in Chuckey, TN \south central area$

This use to be a corn field, on corby bridge rd in Chuckey, TN \south central area

Scannerfood

450,928 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 MTG just broke ranks on the Epstein files: “I can’t conclusively say if that’s why the House isn’t in session… but the House should be in session. There is a new Democrat that’s been elected that does deserve to be sworn in… If it’s to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That’s going to have 218 signatures.” Even Marjorie Taylor Greene knows the GOP stonewall is unsustainable. Swear in Grijalva. Release the files. Let the votes fall where they may.

🚨 MTG just broke ranks on the Epstein files: “I can’t conclusively say if that’s why the House isn’t in session… but the House should be in session. There is a new Democrat that’s been elected that does deserve to be sworn in… If it’s to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That’s going to have 218 signatures.” Even Marjorie Taylor Greene knows the GOP stonewall is unsustainable. Swear in Grijalva. Release the files. Let the votes fall where they may.

Brian Allen

276,081 次观看 • 10 个月前

Nick Fuentes gives a lesson on political power. He wants you to know what LEVERAGE is. This is how we win. “This is where you begin to understand how we have to play…if we can create leverage, then we can get what we want.” “This is what we’re talking about…this is why Trump and loyalty to the GOP is not the end all be all.” “Massie, Boebert, Greene, and Nancy Mace, God Bless them. I have my disagreements with all of them, but they’re heroes today.” “This is a blueprint for the future…it’s a proof of concept.” “It’s Us vs Them. It’s Us vs the party. And the party needs to be punched in the fcking face. And that’s what happened here.” “It’s time to pound our fist on the table and say it’s our way or the highway.” “This is the blueprint, this is how we takeover.” Can anyone seriously say Nick isn’t fair and balanced? He calls out both sides. He speaks for the people. There are no sides. It’s only Us and Them.

Nick Fuentes gives a lesson on political power. He wants you to know what LEVERAGE is. This is how we win. “This is where you begin to understand how we have to play…if we can create leverage, then we can get what we want.” “This is what we’re talking about…this is why Trump and loyalty to the GOP is not the end all be all.” “Massie, Boebert, Greene, and Nancy Mace, God Bless them. I have my disagreements with all of them, but they’re heroes today.” “This is a blueprint for the future…it’s a proof of concept.” “It’s Us vs Them. It’s Us vs the party. And the party needs to be punched in the fcking face. And that’s what happened here.” “It’s time to pound our fist on the table and say it’s our way or the highway.” “This is the blueprint, this is how we takeover.” Can anyone seriously say Nick isn’t fair and balanced? He calls out both sides. He speaks for the people. There are no sides. It’s only Us and Them.

Fractured Light

95,656 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jonesborough, Tn by crossroads gas station Hwy 81s river is floating houses and cars through the tomato fields some houses completely under water search and rescue teams are down here

Jonesborough, Tn by crossroads gas station Hwy 81s river is floating houses and cars through the tomato fields some houses completely under water search and rescue teams are down here

Scannerfood

1,030,751 次观看 • 1 年前

A referendum on separation from Canada will drive jobs and investment out of Saskatchewan, even if it’s unsuccessful – just look at what happened to Quebec. I heard that loud and clear in my meetings with energy leaders this week. That’s why, today, I introduced Bill 604 — the Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act. If passed, this critical legislation will: ➡️ Double the threshold for citizen petitions on separation referendums — from 15 per cent to 30 per cent of eligible voters. ➡️ It would also remove the ability of the Sask. Party Government to unilaterally hold a referendum on separation without broad support. This legislation is designed to provide long-term stability for workers, businesses, and investors at a time of tariffs and renewed uncertainty over Donald Trump’s threats toward Canadian sovereignty. Friends, this is such a critical moment and we have an opportunity to bring Canada together and get generational projects over the line — more rail lines, pipelines and power lines. Canada is 1st. Never 51st.

A referendum on separation from Canada will drive jobs and investment out of Saskatchewan, even if it’s unsuccessful – just look at what happened to Quebec. I heard that loud and clear in my meetings with energy leaders this week. That’s why, today, I introduced Bill 604 — the Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act. If passed, this critical legislation will: ➡️ Double the threshold for citizen petitions on separation referendums — from 15 per cent to 30 per cent of eligible voters. ➡️ It would also remove the ability of the Sask. Party Government to unilaterally hold a referendum on separation without broad support. This legislation is designed to provide long-term stability for workers, businesses, and investors at a time of tariffs and renewed uncertainty over Donald Trump’s threats toward Canadian sovereignty. Friends, this is such a critical moment and we have an opportunity to bring Canada together and get generational projects over the line — more rail lines, pipelines and power lines. Canada is 1st. Never 51st.

Carla Beck

101,338 次观看 • 1 年前

We’re hearing reports about American pressure to advance to the second phase of the Gaza deal. We also heard Trump say at the end of the week that the second phase is coming soon. Then today the IDF Chief of Staff comes and expresses serious doubts about this possibility, calling the Yellow Line “a new border.” It’s a striking headline from the chief of staff’s remarks, and it’s time to set aside the pointless conflicts between him and the defense minister, and to understand that Israel’s security leadership is actually united on this issue. What IDF chief Eyal Zamir said today, which is accepted by Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Katz, and the cabinet, is that the Yellow Line isn’t temporary, not just an interim stop before continued withdrawal and redeployment, but actually in place until further notice — similar to when Berlin was divided, and what started as temporary quickly became permanent. That’s essentially what the chief of staff is saying. Why? Because phase two of the deal includes dismantling Hamas. Hamas set conditions this morning basically saying “No, you’ve misunderstood Trump’s plan. We will hand over our weapons — once a Palestinian state is established in Judea and Samaria and Gaza we’ll hand our weapons to the President of the State of Palestine. Until then, it’s not up for discussion.” Even Qatar’s prime minister said in that well-funded forum to the well-funded Tucker Carlson: Listen, we expect Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza to happen regardless of Hamas being dismantled. Then the IDF chief of staff comes and presents a very clear position that is the only way to protect residents of the Gaza Envelope and the State of Israel in the coming years or perhaps even decades: Israel won’t retreat from the Yellow Line.

We’re hearing reports about American pressure to advance to the second phase of the Gaza deal. We also heard Trump say at the end of the week that the second phase is coming soon. Then today the IDF Chief of Staff comes and expresses serious doubts about this possibility, calling the Yellow Line “a new border.” It’s a striking headline from the chief of staff’s remarks, and it’s time to set aside the pointless conflicts between him and the defense minister, and to understand that Israel’s security leadership is actually united on this issue. What IDF chief Eyal Zamir said today, which is accepted by Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Katz, and the cabinet, is that the Yellow Line isn’t temporary, not just an interim stop before continued withdrawal and redeployment, but actually in place until further notice — similar to when Berlin was divided, and what started as temporary quickly became permanent. That’s essentially what the chief of staff is saying. Why? Because phase two of the deal includes dismantling Hamas. Hamas set conditions this morning basically saying “No, you’ve misunderstood Trump’s plan. We will hand over our weapons — once a Palestinian state is established in Judea and Samaria and Gaza we’ll hand our weapons to the President of the State of Palestine. Until then, it’s not up for discussion.” Even Qatar’s prime minister said in that well-funded forum to the well-funded Tucker Carlson: Listen, we expect Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza to happen regardless of Hamas being dismantled. Then the IDF chief of staff comes and presents a very clear position that is the only way to protect residents of the Gaza Envelope and the State of Israel in the coming years or perhaps even decades: Israel won’t retreat from the Yellow Line.

Amit Segal

48,898 次观看 • 8 个月前

In China, people are asking: Why does the “freest” country in the world produce so many silent tragedies? Why are programmers with $450k salaries dying homeless in the cold? Why do small accidents become death sentences in America? It’s called the American Kill Line. Originating from gaming, “kill line” means instant death when your health drops below a threshold. In the U.S., this term now refers to a cruel societal reality: 💥 Fall behind on rent → Lose your job → Lose your home → Die in silence. The ALICE threshold defines this: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. That’s 37% of Americans. One ambulance bill, one missed paycheck, and you’re out. Capitalism doesn’t save lives. It protects assets. And here lies the paradox: When Americans suffer injustice, they rarely organize against the system, but when their empire wages war, they cheer. Because in America, war is not horror. War is therapy. So while China builds railways, the U.S. builds narratives: 🩺 Poor people “didn’t work hard enough.” 🏚️ Homeless people “chose that life.” 🇻🇪 And foreign leaders are “tyrants” who must be removed... for freedom, of course. Venezuela is not about Maduro, it’s about America needing someone to punish so that millions don’t question the real enemy within. Export the pain, externalize the blame, that’s how imperial peace is maintained. You want to know what truly threatens the U.S. government? It’s not China, not Russia, it’s a mirror. A mirror that reflects back every eviction, every overdose, every child who dies because insulin costs more than food. When your democracy can’t stop people from falling, and your capitalism can’t help them stand again, you only have one thing left: Bomb someone poorer, then call it justice.

In China, people are asking: Why does the “freest” country in the world produce so many silent tragedies? Why are programmers with $450k salaries dying homeless in the cold? Why do small accidents become death sentences in America? It’s called the American Kill Line. Originating from gaming, “kill line” means instant death when your health drops below a threshold. In the U.S., this term now refers to a cruel societal reality: 💥 Fall behind on rent → Lose your job → Lose your home → Die in silence. The ALICE threshold defines this: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. That’s 37% of Americans. One ambulance bill, one missed paycheck, and you’re out. Capitalism doesn’t save lives. It protects assets. And here lies the paradox: When Americans suffer injustice, they rarely organize against the system, but when their empire wages war, they cheer. Because in America, war is not horror. War is therapy. So while China builds railways, the U.S. builds narratives: 🩺 Poor people “didn’t work hard enough.” 🏚️ Homeless people “chose that life.” 🇻🇪 And foreign leaders are “tyrants” who must be removed... for freedom, of course. Venezuela is not about Maduro, it’s about America needing someone to punish so that millions don’t question the real enemy within. Export the pain, externalize the blame, that’s how imperial peace is maintained. You want to know what truly threatens the U.S. government? It’s not China, not Russia, it’s a mirror. A mirror that reflects back every eviction, every overdose, every child who dies because insulin costs more than food. When your democracy can’t stop people from falling, and your capitalism can’t help them stand again, you only have one thing left: Bomb someone poorer, then call it justice.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

346,297 次观看 • 7 个月前

Now THIS is what I’m talkin’ about! . President Trump just dropped one of the best proposals I’ve heard in a LONG time—eliminating capital gains tax on your primary residence. Makes me want to shout HALLELUJAH from the rooftop! . Right now, sellers are capped at $250K (single) or $500K (married) in capital gains exemptions—y’all, that hasn’t been touched since the 90s, like frosted tips and Blockbuster! It NEVER got adjusted for inflation. . So now, folks are sitting on equity like it’s hot coals—afraid to move, sell, or do anything—because Uncle Sam wants a bite of money they ALREADY PAID TAXES ON. Just outdated policy that’s been keeping people stuck and their equity hostage. . You want to fix the housing market? Quit punishing people for building wealth and give them a reason to MOVE. That equity gets reinvested—new homes, new builds, new LIFE in this economy. . And don’t even get me started on the double taxation—you paid taxes on that income before you ever bought the house! . They’ve paid property taxes, weathered recessions, maintained their homes, and invested in their communities for decades. Why in the world should they be penalized for wanting to access the equity they built? . Here’s the bottom line: ✅ It’s double taxation ✅ It’s holding back housing supply ✅ And it’s time to let folks reinvest that money in new homes and new opportunities. . 🏛 So, Congress—wake up and CODIFY this! Let’s make sure this gets across the finish line. . Protect property owners. Unlock housing. Support the American Dream. Do something that helps the taxpayers for a change! We’re watching. . Please *SHARE* if you agree and tag your reps—this is the kind of smart policy we NEED. #taxationistheft Donald J. Trump

Now THIS is what I’m talkin’ about! . President Trump just dropped one of the best proposals I’ve heard in a LONG time—eliminating capital gains tax on your primary residence. Makes me want to shout HALLELUJAH from the rooftop! . Right now, sellers are capped at $250K (single) or $500K (married) in capital gains exemptions—y’all, that hasn’t been touched since the 90s, like frosted tips and Blockbuster! It NEVER got adjusted for inflation. . So now, folks are sitting on equity like it’s hot coals—afraid to move, sell, or do anything—because Uncle Sam wants a bite of money they ALREADY PAID TAXES ON. Just outdated policy that’s been keeping people stuck and their equity hostage. . You want to fix the housing market? Quit punishing people for building wealth and give them a reason to MOVE. That equity gets reinvested—new homes, new builds, new LIFE in this economy. . And don’t even get me started on the double taxation—you paid taxes on that income before you ever bought the house! . They’ve paid property taxes, weathered recessions, maintained their homes, and invested in their communities for decades. Why in the world should they be penalized for wanting to access the equity they built? . Here’s the bottom line: ✅ It’s double taxation ✅ It’s holding back housing supply ✅ And it’s time to let folks reinvest that money in new homes and new opportunities. . 🏛 So, Congress—wake up and CODIFY this! Let’s make sure this gets across the finish line. . Protect property owners. Unlock housing. Support the American Dream. Do something that helps the taxpayers for a change! We’re watching. . Please SHARE if you agree and tag your reps—this is the kind of smart policy we NEED. #taxationistheft Donald J. Trump

Leigh Thomas Brown🇺🇸

196,495 次观看 • 1 年前

Watch how Charlie Kirk engages with a college liberal who says life begins when a baby exits the mother’s womb. He didn’t yell. He didn’t call her names. Instead, he asked her a series of critical questions until her argument completely fell apart. KIRK: “We know deep down it’s wrong to murder a baby.” STUDENT: “You’re not murdering a baby. It’s not a baby.” KIRK: “What is it then?” STUDENT: “It is an embryo, which is not a baby.” KIRK: “So at what point does it become a baby?” STUDENT: “When it is born.” [Crowd groans] STUDENT: “I don’t agree with abortions up to full-term abortions.” KIRK: “Hold on. But you said it becomes a baby when it’s born. Then why would you have abortion limits before it’s born? I thought it’s just an embryo. So embryo rights?” STUDENT: “No, embryo rights aren’t a thing.” KIRK: “But then where would you draw a line for abortion then? And why? And under what moral standard?” STUDENT: “There are medical reasons.” KIRK: “No, that’s not the question.” STUDENT: “You just asked me why would I not have an abortion full term. For medical reasons.” KIRK: “Okay, so at 29 weeks, the baby is nearly fully developed, can recognize the mother’s voice, has a heartbeat, has brainwaves. Is it okay to abort that baby?” STUDENT: “It’s not okay… I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. It’s not okay to have an abortion ever? How about like three weeks in?” KIRK: “Correct. No abortion. Correct.” STUDENT: “Why?” KIRK: “Well, because your life started at conception.” STUDENT: “It did not, though.” KIRK: “Well, hold on. So let’s play this out. So who are you as an individual? From your skin color to your eye color, to your likes, your dislikes, from your temperament to your everything.” STUDENT: “I am not an embryo. I’m a person.” KIRK: “Hold on a second. But it started with something called deoxyribonucleic acid. And your own individual DNA started at the point of egg and sperm meeting. That’s where your journey started. And so from that point in particular, life begins not at birth, not at first words, not at first steps, but when your DNA [developed], which is who you actually are… That doesn’t happen at eight weeks or 10 weeks. It happens at conception.” STUDENT: “What happens if you need a medical abortion? If the mother will die if she does not get an abortion? What’s your stance on that?” KIRK: “The only place where medical abortion is necessary is before 20 weeks, which is incredibly rare.” STUDENT: “What if she will die? What if the mother will die?” KIRK: “This is a very important question. Let’s say it’s 27 weeks, okay? And the mother will die… Why don’t we just have the baby delivered by cesarean section? You know what a cesarean section is, right?” STUDENT: “A C-section.” KIRK: “Why wouldn’t we just put the baby up by C-section instead of terminating it?” STUDENT: “Because if the mother will die, it’s not safe to do that.” KIRK: “But it’s actually safer than an abortion. So every time they say… ‘Oh, you need to have abortion for medical reasons.’ Respond, ‘then have a C-section.’” STUDENT: “What if you’re not able to have a C-section? What if you are on your deathbed? You need to have an abortion right now?” KIRK: “First and foremost, C-section is safer, C-section is quicker. And a C-section saves both lives.” [Crowd erupts]

Watch how Charlie Kirk engages with a college liberal who says life begins when a baby exits the mother’s womb. He didn’t yell. He didn’t call her names. Instead, he asked her a series of critical questions until her argument completely fell apart. KIRK: “We know deep down it’s wrong to murder a baby.” STUDENT: “You’re not murdering a baby. It’s not a baby.” KIRK: “What is it then?” STUDENT: “It is an embryo, which is not a baby.” KIRK: “So at what point does it become a baby?” STUDENT: “When it is born.” [Crowd groans] STUDENT: “I don’t agree with abortions up to full-term abortions.” KIRK: “Hold on. But you said it becomes a baby when it’s born. Then why would you have abortion limits before it’s born? I thought it’s just an embryo. So embryo rights?” STUDENT: “No, embryo rights aren’t a thing.” KIRK: “But then where would you draw a line for abortion then? And why? And under what moral standard?” STUDENT: “There are medical reasons.” KIRK: “No, that’s not the question.” STUDENT: “You just asked me why would I not have an abortion full term. For medical reasons.” KIRK: “Okay, so at 29 weeks, the baby is nearly fully developed, can recognize the mother’s voice, has a heartbeat, has brainwaves. Is it okay to abort that baby?” STUDENT: “It’s not okay… I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. It’s not okay to have an abortion ever? How about like three weeks in?” KIRK: “Correct. No abortion. Correct.” STUDENT: “Why?” KIRK: “Well, because your life started at conception.” STUDENT: “It did not, though.” KIRK: “Well, hold on. So let’s play this out. So who are you as an individual? From your skin color to your eye color, to your likes, your dislikes, from your temperament to your everything.” STUDENT: “I am not an embryo. I’m a person.” KIRK: “Hold on a second. But it started with something called deoxyribonucleic acid. And your own individual DNA started at the point of egg and sperm meeting. That’s where your journey started. And so from that point in particular, life begins not at birth, not at first words, not at first steps, but when your DNA [developed], which is who you actually are… That doesn’t happen at eight weeks or 10 weeks. It happens at conception.” STUDENT: “What happens if you need a medical abortion? If the mother will die if she does not get an abortion? What’s your stance on that?” KIRK: “The only place where medical abortion is necessary is before 20 weeks, which is incredibly rare.” STUDENT: “What if she will die? What if the mother will die?” KIRK: “This is a very important question. Let’s say it’s 27 weeks, okay? And the mother will die… Why don’t we just have the baby delivered by cesarean section? You know what a cesarean section is, right?” STUDENT: “A C-section.” KIRK: “Why wouldn’t we just put the baby up by C-section instead of terminating it?” STUDENT: “Because if the mother will die, it’s not safe to do that.” KIRK: “But it’s actually safer than an abortion. So every time they say… ‘Oh, you need to have abortion for medical reasons.’ Respond, ‘then have a C-section.’” STUDENT: “What if you’re not able to have a C-section? What if you are on your deathbed? You need to have an abortion right now?” KIRK: “First and foremost, C-section is safer, C-section is quicker. And a C-section saves both lives.” [Crowd erupts]

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

149,735 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Curious Case of the Barrister, the Bomb, the Museum and MI5 This story raises more questions the deeper you look. A 25 year old trainee barrister spends two years in war-torn Syria, comes home, then is allegedly caught transporting a Semtex car bomb complete with a detonator and timer. We’re told she didn’t know what she was carrying. She gets bail. We’re also told MI5 and Special Branch knew about the alleged bomb plot for two months. If that’s true, why was a live device allowed to be collected in Phoenix Park and transported up the N2 through public roads before the car was finally stopped at a petrol station in Carrickmacross? Then there’s the second arrest. Simon O’Donovan appears before Ireland’s three-judge, non-jury Special Criminal Court and is refused bail. Prosecutors allege explosives were stored at Collins Barracks……a government-owned museum where he worked. So which is it? Was this such a serious national security threat that it required the Special Criminal Court or was is something worthy of granting bail? The official line is that the intended target was a police officer in Derry. Maybe it was. But given the current political tensions, the growing split within republicanism and the fact that intelligence agencies reportedly knew about the operation well in advance, it’s understandable that people are asking whether the public is being told the full story. Questioning an official narrative isn’t extremism. It’s what people do when the facts presented raise more questions than they answer.

The Curious Case of the Barrister, the Bomb, the Museum and MI5 This story raises more questions the deeper you look. A 25 year old trainee barrister spends two years in war-torn Syria, comes home, then is allegedly caught transporting a Semtex car bomb complete with a detonator and timer. We’re told she didn’t know what she was carrying. She gets bail. We’re also told MI5 and Special Branch knew about the alleged bomb plot for two months. If that’s true, why was a live device allowed to be collected in Phoenix Park and transported up the N2 through public roads before the car was finally stopped at a petrol station in Carrickmacross? Then there’s the second arrest. Simon O’Donovan appears before Ireland’s three-judge, non-jury Special Criminal Court and is refused bail. Prosecutors allege explosives were stored at Collins Barracks……a government-owned museum where he worked. So which is it? Was this such a serious national security threat that it required the Special Criminal Court or was is something worthy of granting bail? The official line is that the intended target was a police officer in Derry. Maybe it was. But given the current political tensions, the growing split within republicanism and the fact that intelligence agencies reportedly knew about the operation well in advance, it’s understandable that people are asking whether the public is being told the full story. Questioning an official narrative isn’t extremism. It’s what people do when the facts presented raise more questions than they answer.

Melissa Ciummei

94,914 次观看 • 22 天前

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl: “if I were to say what the most surprising story was, I would say Marjorie Taylor Greene becomes not just a Trump critic —” Scott Jennings: “MTG became a lib. I mean that’s what happened this year. She got a little bent out of shape because the president wouldn't support her for a state-wide office in Georgia, which she was going to lose if she had gotten into it, by the way. And so she goes off the deep end. Look, I don't think these divisions and all this fraying are as big a deal as some people make it out to be. Trump is still extraordinarily popular among Republicans. He’s the strongest party boss in the modern era.” “And he can get his allies in Congress to do most anything he wants them to do. Which is why I think in the coming year they really ought to spend some time trying to codify, to Rick’s point, his executive orders and some of the other initiatives that he’s had. Really try to make it stick and really fight it out because I think a lot of the things he did would actually be pretty popular political debates to have. And so, why not spend a little time on that? And it would give him something to do this year.” “He's going to have to get out in the country too and, you know, Neera’s making the case against the Trump economy, but the line can be drawn between what he is doing and what mess was left. You started to see him do this in his address to the country.” “But that's another project for 2026. Get out and become the salesman in chief for the Republican agenda. He did it in '24 to great success.”

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl: “if I were to say what the most surprising story was, I would say Marjorie Taylor Greene becomes not just a Trump critic —” Scott Jennings: “MTG became a lib. I mean that’s what happened this year. She got a little bent out of shape because the president wouldn't support her for a state-wide office in Georgia, which she was going to lose if she had gotten into it, by the way. And so she goes off the deep end. Look, I don't think these divisions and all this fraying are as big a deal as some people make it out to be. Trump is still extraordinarily popular among Republicans. He’s the strongest party boss in the modern era.” “And he can get his allies in Congress to do most anything he wants them to do. Which is why I think in the coming year they really ought to spend some time trying to codify, to Rick’s point, his executive orders and some of the other initiatives that he’s had. Really try to make it stick and really fight it out because I think a lot of the things he did would actually be pretty popular political debates to have. And so, why not spend a little time on that? And it would give him something to do this year.” “He's going to have to get out in the country too and, you know, Neera’s making the case against the Trump economy, but the line can be drawn between what he is doing and what mess was left. You started to see him do this in his address to the country.” “But that's another project for 2026. Get out and become the salesman in chief for the Republican agenda. He did it in '24 to great success.”

RedWave Press

380,417 次观看 • 7 个月前

My homeboy sent me this clip and made the argument that this is why he only supports women’s sports to a certain extent. The part about A’ja Wilson having a statue 🤔. I’m not even a South Carolina fan like that, but her statue is well deserved. Her résumé speaks for itself. But she completely lost me when she claimed that Plies is only a fan of South Carolina women’s basketball to groom girls and get them pregnant smh. What makes ppl think it’s cool to throw out dangerous accusations like that with zero proof? The only “proof” she mentioned is that he’s a rapper, saying, “that’s what rappers do.” And that’s not proof of criminal sick behavior. When you accuse someone of grooming, especially involving young women, college athletes, and students, you’re attaching one of the most serious and damaging labels a person can carry. Throwing something like that around casually is reckless as hell. It crosses the line from opinion into defamation territory. I’m not sayin situations like that never happen, but placing that kind of accusation on someone with zero proof is reckless and damaging, and it pushes men away from supporting women’s sports. And it’s harmful asf beyond just one person. Statements like that push this narrative that men can’t support women’s sports without some twisted or weird motive. That dangerous, twisted way of thinking makes men hesitant to publicly show support out of fear of bein labeled predators or told it’s some weird agenda. A lot of us support women’s basketball bc we have daughters who play sports, bc we genuinely respect the talent, the competitiveness, and the culture. It’s really that simple. You can critique fandom. You can question behavior. But accusing someone of grooming and trying to impregnate young women, students, and young women athletes with zero evidence is irresponsible, reckless, and dangerous as hell. That kind of bs does more damage than ppl realize. We can debate sports. We can critique programs. But once we start makin accusations like that with no proof and turning basic fandom into something sinister, that’s when it becomes irresponsible. Men can support women’s sports bc we respect the talent and the greatness. It doesn’t have to be twisted into something ugly.

My homeboy sent me this clip and made the argument that this is why he only supports women’s sports to a certain extent. The part about A’ja Wilson having a statue 🤔. I’m not even a South Carolina fan like that, but her statue is well deserved. Her résumé speaks for itself. But she completely lost me when she claimed that Plies is only a fan of South Carolina women’s basketball to groom girls and get them pregnant smh. What makes ppl think it’s cool to throw out dangerous accusations like that with zero proof? The only “proof” she mentioned is that he’s a rapper, saying, “that’s what rappers do.” And that’s not proof of criminal sick behavior. When you accuse someone of grooming, especially involving young women, college athletes, and students, you’re attaching one of the most serious and damaging labels a person can carry. Throwing something like that around casually is reckless as hell. It crosses the line from opinion into defamation territory. I’m not sayin situations like that never happen, but placing that kind of accusation on someone with zero proof is reckless and damaging, and it pushes men away from supporting women’s sports. And it’s harmful asf beyond just one person. Statements like that push this narrative that men can’t support women’s sports without some twisted or weird motive. That dangerous, twisted way of thinking makes men hesitant to publicly show support out of fear of bein labeled predators or told it’s some weird agenda. A lot of us support women’s basketball bc we have daughters who play sports, bc we genuinely respect the talent, the competitiveness, and the culture. It’s really that simple. You can critique fandom. You can question behavior. But accusing someone of grooming and trying to impregnate young women, students, and young women athletes with zero evidence is irresponsible, reckless, and dangerous as hell. That kind of bs does more damage than ppl realize. We can debate sports. We can critique programs. But once we start makin accusations like that with no proof and turning basic fandom into something sinister, that’s when it becomes irresponsible. Men can support women’s sports bc we respect the talent and the greatness. It doesn’t have to be twisted into something ugly.

Swift

33,888 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨An ICE agent was caught on video trying to illegally intimidate a U.S. citizen for filming in public, in Memphis, TN. The citizen is standing there recording when an agent says, “you’re just one of those guys.” When the citizen asks, “one of what guys?”, the agent doesn’t answer and instead pivots to, “why are you filming us?” The citizen calmly responds, “I’m out in public filming,” which is completely legal. At that point, the agent pulls out his own phone, points it at the citizen, and says he’s recording him “just in case.” Just in case… what? But that’s the part they never say out loud. Because this isn’t about documentation, it’s about pressure. They don’t always arrest you or detain you, they make you feel like they could, like you’re being watched, like exercising a constitutional right might come back on you later. And as they drive away, they yell, “have a good day, commie.” Which is not just a random insult. That’s a federal agent attaching a political label to a U.S. citizen in response to them exercising a constitutional right… in a moment where this administration has repeatedly blurred the line between political opposition and “threat.” That kind of language isn’t harmless… it echoes a broader pattern where people who challenge, or document, government power get framed as dangerous and radical. Because once you label someone, it becomes easier to justify what comes next. The Constitution doesn’t just protect your right to film federal agents, it protects you from retaliation for doing it. Confronting someone for recording, then filming them “just in case,” while attaching a political label in the same breath, isn’t neutral behavior, it’s intimidation.

🚨An ICE agent was caught on video trying to illegally intimidate a U.S. citizen for filming in public, in Memphis, TN. The citizen is standing there recording when an agent says, “you’re just one of those guys.” When the citizen asks, “one of what guys?”, the agent doesn’t answer and instead pivots to, “why are you filming us?” The citizen calmly responds, “I’m out in public filming,” which is completely legal. At that point, the agent pulls out his own phone, points it at the citizen, and says he’s recording him “just in case.” Just in case… what? But that’s the part they never say out loud. Because this isn’t about documentation, it’s about pressure. They don’t always arrest you or detain you, they make you feel like they could, like you’re being watched, like exercising a constitutional right might come back on you later. And as they drive away, they yell, “have a good day, commie.” Which is not just a random insult. That’s a federal agent attaching a political label to a U.S. citizen in response to them exercising a constitutional right… in a moment where this administration has repeatedly blurred the line between political opposition and “threat.” That kind of language isn’t harmless… it echoes a broader pattern where people who challenge, or document, government power get framed as dangerous and radical. Because once you label someone, it becomes easier to justify what comes next. The Constitution doesn’t just protect your right to film federal agents, it protects you from retaliation for doing it. Confronting someone for recording, then filming them “just in case,” while attaching a political label in the same breath, isn’t neutral behavior, it’s intimidation.

Jesus Freakin Congress

148,790 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 A Pennsylvania local utility company is proposing to run new high-voltage power lines across several miles of private farmland in Union and Lycoming counties for a Data Center This would affect about 20 farms and eminent domain is being considered The data center power lines will also effect farms that are officially protected as preserved farmland The lines will cut through their fields, take land out of production and hurt their ability to farm “My family and I operate an average size Pennsylvania dairy farm in Gregg Township, Union County. We have learned that PPNL would like to run a single source 230 kV line potentially across our property to feed a data center that's proposed in Allenwood. To give you an idea, the plot we're standing on is basically the home farm, which originally was a 93 acre farm purchased by my grandfather almost 100 years ago. My sons are the fourth generation here.” “They're proposing to take 150 foot right of way across our fields” He shows the area they want to take and it will be completely devastating to his farm. It will make it very difficult to farm and they will also do things like compact the soil that will reduce yield on at least 5 acres Using eminent domain like this isn’t helping the public. It’s being weaponized against the public for private companies Farmers and the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau say PPL, which is the utility company, has made clear it is prepared to use eminent domain if landowners refuse to sell or grant rights voluntarily

🚨 A Pennsylvania local utility company is proposing to run new high-voltage power lines across several miles of private farmland in Union and Lycoming counties for a Data Center This would affect about 20 farms and eminent domain is being considered The data center power lines will also effect farms that are officially protected as preserved farmland The lines will cut through their fields, take land out of production and hurt their ability to farm “My family and I operate an average size Pennsylvania dairy farm in Gregg Township, Union County. We have learned that PPNL would like to run a single source 230 kV line potentially across our property to feed a data center that's proposed in Allenwood. To give you an idea, the plot we're standing on is basically the home farm, which originally was a 93 acre farm purchased by my grandfather almost 100 years ago. My sons are the fourth generation here.” “They're proposing to take 150 foot right of way across our fields” He shows the area they want to take and it will be completely devastating to his farm. It will make it very difficult to farm and they will also do things like compact the soil that will reduce yield on at least 5 acres Using eminent domain like this isn’t helping the public. It’s being weaponized against the public for private companies Farmers and the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau say PPL, which is the utility company, has made clear it is prepared to use eminent domain if landowners refuse to sell or grant rights voluntarily

Wall Street Apes

127,452 次观看 • 16 天前