Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 Greg Gutfeld gives a REALITY CHECK on the Supreme Court Ruling: “It doesn’t block the system of tariffs, it just adjusts the leverage. It’s all about leverage.” “For the people that are gloating, they are probably the same people who backed the student loan bailout. They can STFU,...

TVNewsNow's profile picture

TV News Now

40,338 subscribers

174,884 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Trump: Tariffs—the other day with the supreme court—they did the wrong thing but it made no difference because we have another way of doing it. They always have to make it the hard way!
1:01

Trump: Tariffs—the other day with the supreme court—they did the wrong thing but it made no difference because we have another way of doing it. They always have to make it the hard way!

Acyn

16,533 views • 4 months ago

"This Supreme Court has shown that it is nothing but an illegitimate arm of the Republican Party. You have Supreme Court justices who swore up and down they respected precedent as it relates to Roe-- the first thing they did is overturn Roe. Same exact thing with redistricting. Swore they supported it-- until they didn't."
0:35

"This Supreme Court has shown that it is nothing but an illegitimate arm of the Republican Party. You have Supreme Court justices who swore up and down they respected precedent as it relates to Roe-- the first thing they did is overturn Roe. Same exact thing with redistricting. Swore they supported it-- until they didn't."

Brian Tyler Cohen

66,248 views • 1 month ago

Biden on student loan cancellation: “The Supreme Court blocked it. But that didn't stop me."
2:28

Biden on student loan cancellation: “The Supreme Court blocked it. But that didn't stop me."

TheBlaze

6,641,940 views • 2 years ago

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers.
3:03

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers.

Trump War Room

391,935 views • 1 year ago

The Supreme Court just argued that Trump’s tariffs are “taxes.” That’s not law — that’s politics in robes. Trump’s team pushed back hard: “These tariffs are regulation, not taxation. They’re leverage — not revenue.” And they’re right. The whole idea that the President can ban imports outright but can’t charge a fee to regulate them is absurd. The Founders built this nation on tariffs, not taxes. “No taxation without representation.” That’s how America began — and it’s exactly what the courts are trying to erase today. This isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about who runs America — the elected President or the unelected bench.
26:59

The Supreme Court just argued that Trump’s tariffs are “taxes.” That’s not law — that’s politics in robes. Trump’s team pushed back hard: “These tariffs are regulation, not taxation. They’re leverage — not revenue.” And they’re right. The whole idea that the President can ban imports outright but can’t charge a fee to regulate them is absurd. The Founders built this nation on tariffs, not taxes. “No taxation without representation.” That’s how America began — and it’s exactly what the courts are trying to erase today. This isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about who runs America — the elected President or the unelected bench.

Andrew Branca Show

466,093 views • 7 months ago

For all of you whining about Trump’s tariffs like it’s the end of the world….It ain’t—it’s USA RELOADED! The Trump tariffs aren’t chaos - they’re a correction! Like it or not—THIS is what you can expect! ⬇️ Watch NOW!
2:12

For all of you whining about Trump’s tariffs like it’s the end of the world….It ain’t—it’s USA RELOADED! The Trump tariffs aren’t chaos - they’re a correction! Like it or not—THIS is what you can expect! ⬇️ Watch NOW!

MikeMac

63,038 views • 1 year ago

“Only a Democrat would come out against cheap gas…” Trump is ready to drill baby, drill in Venezuela which’ll send gas prices plummeting, but the “affordability” Dems are still pouting about “Dictator” Trump GregGutfeld : “It shows you that the mantra of affordability was just a mantra. They talk about it, but Trump actually delivers it… Trump has this great filter. It’s not neo-con, it’s not isolationism. It’s what’s best for us.”
1:33

“Only a Democrat would come out against cheap gas…” Trump is ready to drill baby, drill in Venezuela which’ll send gas prices plummeting, but the “affordability” Dems are still pouting about “Dictator” Trump GregGutfeld : “It shows you that the mantra of affordability was just a mantra. They talk about it, but Trump actually delivers it… Trump has this great filter. It’s not neo-con, it’s not isolationism. It’s what’s best for us.”

The Five

41,827 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just put the Supreme Court on notice. He says they need to DO THE RIGHT THING and uphold his tariffs. Then he drops this: “You know who brought the cases against us? People that have business in China. They want to keep ripping us off. The tariffs stopped them.” There it is. Not small shops on Main Street. Not American workers. Companies tied to China fighting to protect their margins. Tariffs aren’t about paperwork. They’re about leverage. They’re about stopping the bleed. They’re about putting American industry first. Now the Court decides. Stand with U.S. manufacturing? Or side with businesses invested in Beijing? This one matters. 🇺🇸
0:40

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just put the Supreme Court on notice. He says they need to DO THE RIGHT THING and uphold his tariffs. Then he drops this: “You know who brought the cases against us? People that have business in China. They want to keep ripping us off. The tariffs stopped them.” There it is. Not small shops on Main Street. Not American workers. Companies tied to China fighting to protect their margins. Tariffs aren’t about paperwork. They’re about leverage. They’re about stopping the bleed. They’re about putting American industry first. Now the Court decides. Stand with U.S. manufacturing? Or side with businesses invested in Beijing? This one matters. 🇺🇸

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

450,529 views • 4 months ago

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)
3:03

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Trump War Room

319,071 views • 1 year ago

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)
3:03

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Trump War Room

2,626,324 views • 1 year ago

Coca-Cola sounds like it’s a drink you might not want to drink. They are teaming up with Microsoft, and it looks like it will be great for them but not so great for us. These people are sick, evil people that are determined to reduce the population. Check this out if you drink their products! 👺☠️
1:29

Coca-Cola sounds like it’s a drink you might not want to drink. They are teaming up with Microsoft, and it looks like it will be great for them but not so great for us. These people are sick, evil people that are determined to reduce the population. Check this out if you drink their products! 👺☠️

Lisa 🌹💃🏻

809,910 views • 2 years ago

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?
2:31

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

729,759 views • 3 months ago

beabadoobee clarifies that she doesn’t have an issue with the ‘Artists Who Can vs. Can’t Sing’ videos, but with the comments that she’s been receiving following the trend: “If you go through the [videos], I have commented on them. […] I have commented being like, ‘this is lowkey funny to me.’ It was just like the spamming dude, and everyone from that community coming to my account and saying so much more weirder sh*t. I’m sorry if I didn’t put that across in my rant video. […] I’m just tired of feeling like the punching bag, constantly. […] I think it’s just one thing where it’s just a meme and a joke and it’s funny, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like constantly everywhere on your comments and on your social media, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like you’ve somehow managed to attract the same group of people who are constantly sexualizing you and just being super super disrespectful. It makes me uncomfortable.”
4:47

beabadoobee clarifies that she doesn’t have an issue with the ‘Artists Who Can vs. Can’t Sing’ videos, but with the comments that she’s been receiving following the trend: “If you go through the [videos], I have commented on them. […] I have commented being like, ‘this is lowkey funny to me.’ It was just like the spamming dude, and everyone from that community coming to my account and saying so much more weirder sh*t. I’m sorry if I didn’t put that across in my rant video. […] I’m just tired of feeling like the punching bag, constantly. […] I think it’s just one thing where it’s just a meme and a joke and it’s funny, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like constantly everywhere on your comments and on your social media, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like you’ve somehow managed to attract the same group of people who are constantly sexualizing you and just being super super disrespectful. It makes me uncomfortable.”

Pop Base

961,953 views • 1 year ago

So we just got this thing on casters so we can move it around the shop easily Our preliminary damage report is that it doesn’t actually seem that damaged The previous owner said that he had it for a citation 500 and they decided to get rid of the airplane so the last time this engine ran was in 2013 however, one of the compressor blades came off and went partially through the engine However, it didn’t go through to the turbine so it’s somewhere in here. We just have to find where it is. But in theory, it shouldn’t take too much to get this thing running for right now we’re just gonna be focusing on the teardown and we won’t know it’s ultimate state until it’s fully disassembled But so far things are looking good
0:37

So we just got this thing on casters so we can move it around the shop easily Our preliminary damage report is that it doesn’t actually seem that damaged The previous owner said that he had it for a citation 500 and they decided to get rid of the airplane so the last time this engine ran was in 2013 however, one of the compressor blades came off and went partially through the engine However, it didn’t go through to the turbine so it’s somewhere in here. We just have to find where it is. But in theory, it shouldn’t take too much to get this thing running for right now we’re just gonna be focusing on the teardown and we won’t know it’s ultimate state until it’s fully disassembled But so far things are looking good

Phoenix𝕏

38,043 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are – I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that – look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."
1:44

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are – I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that – look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."

Eric Daugherty

15,227 views • 1 month ago

This is the future of storytelling. Not in some distant way… but like right now. I made this using AI. It’s called PAPERCUT. A new animated film concept I'm developing. It's not perfect, but it gets the creative juices flowing. The idea came from my son. We were just talking and he said he wished there was a movie about a Blasian kid surviving a zombie apocalypse. And it hit me… that movie doesn’t exist. Not because it’s not a good idea, but because it would probably never get made. So I made it. And once I started, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Like where did all the great zombie movies go? The ones that felt original, that had personality. The Shaun of the Deads, the George Romero classics. What if you took that energy… but made it animated? Stylized. A little fun. A little scary. Something a kid could watch, but still feel the danger. That’s what this is. Honestly… this doesn’t happen without AI. This idea just stays a conversation. But now it’s real. That’s the shift. You don’t have to wait around anymore hoping someone says yes. You can just go make the thing.
3:25

This is the future of storytelling. Not in some distant way… but like right now. I made this using AI. It’s called PAPERCUT. A new animated film concept I'm developing. It's not perfect, but it gets the creative juices flowing. The idea came from my son. We were just talking and he said he wished there was a movie about a Blasian kid surviving a zombie apocalypse. And it hit me… that movie doesn’t exist. Not because it’s not a good idea, but because it would probably never get made. So I made it. And once I started, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Like where did all the great zombie movies go? The ones that felt original, that had personality. The Shaun of the Deads, the George Romero classics. What if you took that energy… but made it animated? Stylized. A little fun. A little scary. Something a kid could watch, but still feel the danger. That’s what this is. Honestly… this doesn’t happen without AI. This idea just stays a conversation. But now it’s real. That’s the shift. You don’t have to wait around anymore hoping someone says yes. You can just go make the thing.

Dave Clark

40,047 views • 2 months ago

Naval Ravikant on the “single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success” Naval admits it’s very difficult to predict which startups will work—only 1 out of 10 of his angel investments succeed—but he has noticed a common trait among many of the great companies: “The founders are in it for the long haul. And the way you see that evidence very early on. They are extremely deliberate about all kinds of small decisions. Stuff you might think that doesn’t matter… And what you realize is is it’s their nature to obsess over these things because they feel like like they’re laying the bricks and the foundation of a skyscraper.” He contrasts this to entrepreneurs are more careless early on: “The people who are flippant about things… they’re often signaling to you that they’ll sell the company the first chance they get, or the moment that it looks like they’re gonna run out of cash, they’ll shut down.” He continues: “So I think that long-term mentality is probably the single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success. But it’s by no means the only thing. It’s a very competitive environment. Most startups fail. And so you just gotta stick with it.” Video source: Startup Grind (2013)
1:36

Naval Ravikant on the “single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success” Naval admits it’s very difficult to predict which startups will work—only 1 out of 10 of his angel investments succeed—but he has noticed a common trait among many of the great companies: “The founders are in it for the long haul. And the way you see that evidence very early on. They are extremely deliberate about all kinds of small decisions. Stuff you might think that doesn’t matter… And what you realize is is it’s their nature to obsess over these things because they feel like like they’re laying the bricks and the foundation of a skyscraper.” He contrasts this to entrepreneurs are more careless early on: “The people who are flippant about things… they’re often signaling to you that they’ll sell the company the first chance they get, or the moment that it looks like they’re gonna run out of cash, they’ll shut down.” He continues: “So I think that long-term mentality is probably the single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success. But it’s by no means the only thing. It’s a very competitive environment. Most startups fail. And so you just gotta stick with it.” Video source: Startup Grind (2013)

Startup Archive

95,915 views • 1 year ago

🚨 HOUSE REPUBLICANS OWN EVERY CENT OF THE TARIFF MESS. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s illegal tariffs. But don’t get it twisted. House Republicans didn't just "watch" prices spike - they VOTED for the tariffs that gutted your paycheck. The American people won’t forget.
0:57

🚨 HOUSE REPUBLICANS OWN EVERY CENT OF THE TARIFF MESS. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s illegal tariffs. But don’t get it twisted. House Republicans didn't just "watch" prices spike - they VOTED for the tariffs that gutted your paycheck. The American people won’t forget.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

142,734 views • 4 months ago

Qullamaggie on If You’re Not a Moron You Will Make it Far in Trading “The best thing are people that keep commenting on YouTube. They’re like hey what’s ADR hey how do you trade your setup. He’s like dude the instructions are literally on the screen. It’s amazing like this is the reason — you know if you’re just a little bit above moron level, you gonna make it far in life. Because most people they just can’t get above the moron level. Like the level you need to reach to get successful in any field is actually lower than you would think. Because most people are just not really… yeah everyone just wants to get rich, they want everything served on a silver platter. Those are the people that pay our bills haha.”
0:51

Qullamaggie on If You’re Not a Moron You Will Make it Far in Trading “The best thing are people that keep commenting on YouTube. They’re like hey what’s ADR hey how do you trade your setup. He’s like dude the instructions are literally on the screen. It’s amazing like this is the reason — you know if you’re just a little bit above moron level, you gonna make it far in life. Because most people they just can’t get above the moron level. Like the level you need to reach to get successful in any field is actually lower than you would think. Because most people are just not really… yeah everyone just wants to get rich, they want everything served on a silver platter. Those are the people that pay our bills haha.”

Lone

15,388 views • 16 days ago

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.
1:28

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 views • 4 months ago