Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 Greg Gutfeld gives a REALITY CHECK on the Supreme Court Ruling: “It doesn’t block the system of tariffs, it just adjusts the leverage. It’s all about leverage.” “For the people that are gloating, they are probably the same people who backed the student loan bailout. They can STFU,... show more

TV News Now

40,338 subscribers

174,884 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Trump: Tariffs—the other day with the supreme court—they did the wrong thing but it made no difference because we have another way of doing it. They always have to make it the hard way!

Trump: Tariffs—the other day with the supreme court—they did the wrong thing but it made no difference because we have another way of doing it. They always have to make it the hard way!

Acyn

16,533 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"This Supreme Court has shown that it is nothing but an illegitimate arm of the Republican Party. You have Supreme Court justices who swore up and down they respected precedent as it relates to Roe-- the first thing they did is overturn Roe. Same exact thing with redistricting. Swore they supported it-- until they didn't."

"This Supreme Court has shown that it is nothing but an illegitimate arm of the Republican Party. You have Supreme Court justices who swore up and down they respected precedent as it relates to Roe-- the first thing they did is overturn Roe. Same exact thing with redistricting. Swore they supported it-- until they didn't."

Brian Tyler Cohen

66,274 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court just argued that Trump’s tariffs are “taxes.” That’s not law — that’s politics in robes. Trump’s team pushed back hard: “These tariffs are regulation, not taxation. They’re leverage — not revenue.” And they’re right. The whole idea that the President can ban imports outright but can’t charge a fee to regulate them is absurd. The Founders built this nation on tariffs, not taxes. “No taxation without representation.” That’s how America began — and it’s exactly what the courts are trying to erase today. This isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about who runs America — the elected President or the unelected bench.

The Supreme Court just argued that Trump’s tariffs are “taxes.” That’s not law — that’s politics in robes. Trump’s team pushed back hard: “These tariffs are regulation, not taxation. They’re leverage — not revenue.” And they’re right. The whole idea that the President can ban imports outright but can’t charge a fee to regulate them is absurd. The Founders built this nation on tariffs, not taxes. “No taxation without representation.” That’s how America began — and it’s exactly what the courts are trying to erase today. This isn’t about trade anymore. It’s about who runs America — the elected President or the unelected bench.

Andrew Branca Show

466,093 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers.

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers.

Trump War Room

391,940 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Only a Democrat would come out against cheap gas…” Trump is ready to drill baby, drill in Venezuela which’ll send gas prices plummeting, but the “affordability” Dems are still pouting about “Dictator” Trump GregGutfeld : “It shows you that the mantra of affordability was just a mantra. They talk about it, but Trump actually delivers it… Trump has this great filter. It’s not neo-con, it’s not isolationism. It’s what’s best for us.”

“Only a Democrat would come out against cheap gas…” Trump is ready to drill baby, drill in Venezuela which’ll send gas prices plummeting, but the “affordability” Dems are still pouting about “Dictator” Trump GregGutfeld : “It shows you that the mantra of affordability was just a mantra. They talk about it, but Trump actually delivers it… Trump has this great filter. It’s not neo-con, it’s not isolationism. It’s what’s best for us.”

The Five

41,847 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 PETE BUTTIGIEG JUST MADE THE CASE FOR PACKING THE SUPREME COURT In a new interview, the Democratic candidate stopped short of calling himself a socialist — but still pushed radical institutional change. On the Supreme Court, Buttigieg said: “We could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate… It has come to feel like a nakedly partisan institution.” Translation: The Court is only “illegitimate” when it doesn’t deliver the outcomes the left wants. This is the same argument we’ve heard for years. When they don’t like the rulings, they attack the institution itself. Court-packing isn’t reform. It’s a power play.

🚨 PETE BUTTIGIEG JUST MADE THE CASE FOR PACKING THE SUPREME COURT In a new interview, the Democratic candidate stopped short of calling himself a socialist — but still pushed radical institutional change. On the Supreme Court, Buttigieg said: “We could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate… It has come to feel like a nakedly partisan institution.” Translation: The Court is only “illegitimate” when it doesn’t deliver the outcomes the left wants. This is the same argument we’ve heard for years. When they don’t like the rulings, they attack the institution itself. Court-packing isn’t reform. It’s a power play.

Gunther Eagleman™

45,405 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Running this page has opened my eyes to how many racists who hate white people we have living amongst us. It’s disgusting. I see on a daily basis, people in the comments banging on about slavery and colonialism. They don’t realise the luckiest day of their lives was being born in a western democracy. They have lived a life of privilege but like to be a victim. They are angry with white people moving into black countries hundreds of years ago. But perfectly fine with black people moving to white countries in the present day. They call it immigration when it’s them. They are in support of people being able to live wherever they want. Just not when it’s white people. That’s colonialism and it’s evil. They don’t realise they are everything that they hate the colonisers for. They take all the benefits of being here. But still hate us for it. They use history and things that didn’t happen to them as a scapegoat to be openly hateful towards us. In their own mind it justifies their racism so they can still hold the self righteous belief they are a good person. But when I see people like this. It restores my faith in immigration. It’s good to know that this can sometimes be the outcome. Not everyone is selfish and only care about their own race. There are plenty of people who care about us too. Plenty of people see it for what it is and stand by our side and I have nothing but respect for them. I wish everyone was like that. Thank you to this man for speaking out for us and showing common sense. Because when we say this, they call is far right racists and fascists. But in reality we are only human just like anyone else. Only we are taught to just accept this and eat shit and be happy. It’s double standards and this man is bang on it 👏👏

Running this page has opened my eyes to how many racists who hate white people we have living amongst us. It’s disgusting. I see on a daily basis, people in the comments banging on about slavery and colonialism. They don’t realise the luckiest day of their lives was being born in a western democracy. They have lived a life of privilege but like to be a victim. They are angry with white people moving into black countries hundreds of years ago. But perfectly fine with black people moving to white countries in the present day. They call it immigration when it’s them. They are in support of people being able to live wherever they want. Just not when it’s white people. That’s colonialism and it’s evil. They don’t realise they are everything that they hate the colonisers for. They take all the benefits of being here. But still hate us for it. They use history and things that didn’t happen to them as a scapegoat to be openly hateful towards us. In their own mind it justifies their racism so they can still hold the self righteous belief they are a good person. But when I see people like this. It restores my faith in immigration. It’s good to know that this can sometimes be the outcome. Not everyone is selfish and only care about their own race. There are plenty of people who care about us too. Plenty of people see it for what it is and stand by our side and I have nothing but respect for them. I wish everyone was like that. Thank you to this man for speaking out for us and showing common sense. Because when we say this, they call is far right racists and fascists. But in reality we are only human just like anyone else. Only we are taught to just accept this and eat shit and be happy. It’s double standards and this man is bang on it 👏👏

Around Liverpool

42,362 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Trump War Room

2,626,394 просмотров • 1 год назад

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Q: Kamala says President Trump's tariffs are a "sales tax" — but the Harris-Biden admin just announced new tariffs on Chinese goods. Isn't it the same thing? KJP: Well, see... Q: Is it not the same thing? KJP: We're trying to protect workers. (TRUMP WAS RIGHT — AGAIN)

Trump War Room

319,076 просмотров • 1 год назад

Atlas: “Originalism is [the Supreme Court justices saying] ‘we're not here to make new laws’... it's not a legislative branch... People on the left are worried about the power of the Supreme Court, but the power of the Supreme Court is magnified enormously if you allow it to remake the law. Then you get a tiny group of people who are not elected, who are not answerable to the public, who are in a position of making new laws.”

Atlas: “Originalism is [the Supreme Court justices saying] ‘we're not here to make new laws’... it's not a legislative branch... People on the left are worried about the power of the Supreme Court, but the power of the Supreme Court is magnified enormously if you allow it to remake the law. Then you get a tiny group of people who are not elected, who are not answerable to the public, who are in a position of making new laws.”

The Independent with Scott Atlas

12,917 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Coca-Cola sounds like it’s a drink you might not want to drink. They are teaming up with Microsoft, and it looks like it will be great for them but not so great for us. These people are sick, evil people that are determined to reduce the population. Check this out if you drink their products! 👺☠️

Coca-Cola sounds like it’s a drink you might not want to drink. They are teaming up with Microsoft, and it looks like it will be great for them but not so great for us. These people are sick, evil people that are determined to reduce the population. Check this out if you drink their products! 👺☠️

Lisa 🌹💃🏻

810,051 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

730,607 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

beabadoobee clarifies that she doesn’t have an issue with the ‘Artists Who Can vs. Can’t Sing’ videos, but with the comments that she’s been receiving following the trend: “If you go through the [videos], I have commented on them. […] I have commented being like, ‘this is lowkey funny to me.’ It was just like the spamming dude, and everyone from that community coming to my account and saying so much more weirder sh*t. I’m sorry if I didn’t put that across in my rant video. […] I’m just tired of feeling like the punching bag, constantly. […] I think it’s just one thing where it’s just a meme and a joke and it’s funny, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like constantly everywhere on your comments and on your social media, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like you’ve somehow managed to attract the same group of people who are constantly sexualizing you and just being super super disrespectful. It makes me uncomfortable.”

beabadoobee clarifies that she doesn’t have an issue with the ‘Artists Who Can vs. Can’t Sing’ videos, but with the comments that she’s been receiving following the trend: “If you go through the [videos], I have commented on them. […] I have commented being like, ‘this is lowkey funny to me.’ It was just like the spamming dude, and everyone from that community coming to my account and saying so much more weirder sh*t. I’m sorry if I didn’t put that across in my rant video. […] I’m just tired of feeling like the punching bag, constantly. […] I think it’s just one thing where it’s just a meme and a joke and it’s funny, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like constantly everywhere on your comments and on your social media, and then it becomes another thing when it’s like you’ve somehow managed to attract the same group of people who are constantly sexualizing you and just being super super disrespectful. It makes me uncomfortable.”

Pop Base

962,638 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are – I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that – look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are – I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that – look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."

Eric Daugherty

15,406 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

So we just got this thing on casters so we can move it around the shop easily Our preliminary damage report is that it doesn’t actually seem that damaged The previous owner said that he had it for a citation 500 and they decided to get rid of the airplane so the last time this engine ran was in 2013 however, one of the compressor blades came off and went partially through the engine However, it didn’t go through to the turbine so it’s somewhere in here. We just have to find where it is. But in theory, it shouldn’t take too much to get this thing running for right now we’re just gonna be focusing on the teardown and we won’t know it’s ultimate state until it’s fully disassembled But so far things are looking good

So we just got this thing on casters so we can move it around the shop easily Our preliminary damage report is that it doesn’t actually seem that damaged The previous owner said that he had it for a citation 500 and they decided to get rid of the airplane so the last time this engine ran was in 2013 however, one of the compressor blades came off and went partially through the engine However, it didn’t go through to the turbine so it’s somewhere in here. We just have to find where it is. But in theory, it shouldn’t take too much to get this thing running for right now we’re just gonna be focusing on the teardown and we won’t know it’s ultimate state until it’s fully disassembled But so far things are looking good

Phoenix𝕏

38,043 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Naval Ravikant on the “single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success” Naval admits it’s very difficult to predict which startups will work—only 1 out of 10 of his angel investments succeed—but he has noticed a common trait among many of the great companies: “The founders are in it for the long haul. And the way you see that evidence very early on. They are extremely deliberate about all kinds of small decisions. Stuff you might think that doesn’t matter… And what you realize is is it’s their nature to obsess over these things because they feel like like they’re laying the bricks and the foundation of a skyscraper.” He contrasts this to entrepreneurs are more careless early on: “The people who are flippant about things… they’re often signaling to you that they’ll sell the company the first chance they get, or the moment that it looks like they’re gonna run out of cash, they’ll shut down.” He continues: “So I think that long-term mentality is probably the single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success. But it’s by no means the only thing. It’s a very competitive environment. Most startups fail. And so you just gotta stick with it.” Video source: Startup Grind (2013)

Naval Ravikant on the “single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success” Naval admits it’s very difficult to predict which startups will work—only 1 out of 10 of his angel investments succeed—but he has noticed a common trait among many of the great companies: “The founders are in it for the long haul. And the way you see that evidence very early on. They are extremely deliberate about all kinds of small decisions. Stuff you might think that doesn’t matter… And what you realize is is it’s their nature to obsess over these things because they feel like like they’re laying the bricks and the foundation of a skyscraper.” He contrasts this to entrepreneurs are more careless early on: “The people who are flippant about things… they’re often signaling to you that they’ll sell the company the first chance they get, or the moment that it looks like they’re gonna run out of cash, they’ll shut down.” He continues: “So I think that long-term mentality is probably the single-most important indicator of an entrepreneur’s success. But it’s by no means the only thing. It’s a very competitive environment. Most startups fail. And so you just gotta stick with it.” Video source: Startup Grind (2013)

Startup Archive

95,915 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 HOUSE REPUBLICANS OWN EVERY CENT OF THE TARIFF MESS. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s illegal tariffs. But don’t get it twisted. House Republicans didn't just "watch" prices spike - they VOTED for the tariffs that gutted your paycheck. The American people won’t forget.

🚨 HOUSE REPUBLICANS OWN EVERY CENT OF THE TARIFF MESS. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s illegal tariffs. But don’t get it twisted. House Republicans didn't just "watch" prices spike - they VOTED for the tariffs that gutted your paycheck. The American people won’t forget.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

142,734 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is the future of storytelling. Not in some distant way… but like right now. I made this using AI. It’s called PAPERCUT. A new animated film concept I'm developing. It's not perfect, but it gets the creative juices flowing. The idea came from my son. We were just talking and he said he wished there was a movie about a Blasian kid surviving a zombie apocalypse. And it hit me… that movie doesn’t exist. Not because it’s not a good idea, but because it would probably never get made. So I made it. And once I started, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Like where did all the great zombie movies go? The ones that felt original, that had personality. The Shaun of the Deads, the George Romero classics. What if you took that energy… but made it animated? Stylized. A little fun. A little scary. Something a kid could watch, but still feel the danger. That’s what this is. Honestly… this doesn’t happen without AI. This idea just stays a conversation. But now it’s real. That’s the shift. You don’t have to wait around anymore hoping someone says yes. You can just go make the thing.

This is the future of storytelling. Not in some distant way… but like right now. I made this using AI. It’s called PAPERCUT. A new animated film concept I'm developing. It's not perfect, but it gets the creative juices flowing. The idea came from my son. We were just talking and he said he wished there was a movie about a Blasian kid surviving a zombie apocalypse. And it hit me… that movie doesn’t exist. Not because it’s not a good idea, but because it would probably never get made. So I made it. And once I started, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Like where did all the great zombie movies go? The ones that felt original, that had personality. The Shaun of the Deads, the George Romero classics. What if you took that energy… but made it animated? Stylized. A little fun. A little scary. Something a kid could watch, but still feel the danger. That’s what this is. Honestly… this doesn’t happen without AI. This idea just stays a conversation. But now it’s real. That’s the shift. You don’t have to wait around anymore hoping someone says yes. You can just go make the thing.

Dave Clark

40,116 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад