Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Grenfell style cladding, highly flammable insulation, no fire breaks between windows. No wonder residents at King Edward’s Wharf in Birmingham are worried. Insurance costs have gone up 1000%. Property owners can’t sell because banks won’t lend due to fire dangers. They’re waiting on £12m Govt money to make outside... show more

Richard Gaisford

46,253 subscribers

28,509 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Richard Gaisford

Richard Gaisford1 год назад

Residents talk of living in fear, with slow progress on remediation. @fbunational @MattWrack tells us of concerns for buildings with dangerous flaws outside of city centres.

Фото профиля James Dawson

James Dawson1 год назад

Many lives could've been saved if residents were not told to stay in their homes? So, surely some of the blame lies here also?

Фото профиля Brian Wiltshire

Brian Wiltshire1 год назад

@GMB Most of these flats was built under Blairs goverment , annother charge to add to his war crimes

Фото профиля David C Scott 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧 🇩🇪🇪🇺 UTI

David C Scott 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧 🇩🇪🇪🇺 UTI1 год назад

@GMB It’s mostly brickwork? Of course the insulation remains an issue.

Фото профиля 🛂 Adam J Lewis®™

🛂 Adam J Lewis®™1 год назад

Happy to talk openly as an ex regulator, fire officer and ex firefighter I’m hearing all sorts of misinformation and worried people are being mislead Let’s get the story straight

Фото профиля Rainbowland

Rainbowland1 год назад

@mhclg @TheFCA @CMAgovUK @TPOmb - take it all in. Watch. Learn. Evolve. @FreeLeasehlders @NLC_2019 @Leaseholderhelp

Фото профиля Melania

Melania1 год назад

The legacy of Grenfell shouldn't be lives financially blighted

Фото профиля 2pack Shakur

2pack Shakur1 год назад

"Stand against Russian sexual crimes in Chechnya"

Фото профиля Lily

Lily1 год назад

@EOCS_Official Same going on all over the country! You should see the problems in Swansea. A never ending cycle of pass the blame and refuse to take accountability

Фото профиля BG 70

BG 701 год назад

These cladding boards were made from pressed Celotex, plastic % combustible, ECO boards. They were Eco FRIENDLY? The dopes that glue themselves to fridges railings roads and anything near to them re ECO DREAMS CAUSED THIS SORROW !!! BLood on your hands you Eco fckng warriors.

Похожие видео

UPDATE On The Lahaina, Maui Fire Victims In Hawaii Victims Are Having To Bounce Around From Hotel To Hotel While Still Being Charged Mortgages On Their Destroyed Homes & Get This, “Residents are being sued for trying to build mobile homes on their own property.” “No one is talking about the Lahaina fire anymore. So let me tell you what's going on as told by locals. Since the fire, locals are saying that the city is not approving building permits, so they cannot rebuild their homes. The US government won't allow insurance adjusters to take pictures or visit homes, so insurance payouts are still being processed. Residents are being sued for trying to build mobile homes on their own property. The banks are still charging mortgage payments, and with people falling behind on their payments, the banks are gonna repossess their land. Many Maui residents are being shuffled around from hotel to hotel. They can't unpack. They can't get settled, and they can even start building a new life almost half a year later. Maui's mayor, Josh Green, and the city council are trying to force Airbnb owners to convert their properties into long term rentals for displaced residents. Isn't that interesting, moving away from private ownership and leaving rentals as the only option. So much about the Lahaina fire situation gives 15 minute city vibes. It screams land grabs and marxism. It has Longman said that the Hawaiian Islands act as control groups and the Hawaiians as unwitting test subjects for the US government. As for the cause of the fire, we still don't have a cause. The official story was that the hurricane winds down at the power line, but the CEO of the local utility, Hawaiian Electric, says their power lines knocked down by the high winds appeared to have caused a fire that same morning of August 8th, but she said she was told by the Maui County Fire Department that it was put out, and that their company is not responsible for the fire that later swept Lahaina. So the fire department put it out, reported it to Hawaiian Electric, and then later we have a fire that destroys the entire town. So where did that fire come from?”

UPDATE On The Lahaina, Maui Fire Victims In Hawaii Victims Are Having To Bounce Around From Hotel To Hotel While Still Being Charged Mortgages On Their Destroyed Homes & Get This, “Residents are being sued for trying to build mobile homes on their own property.” “No one is talking about the Lahaina fire anymore. So let me tell you what's going on as told by locals. Since the fire, locals are saying that the city is not approving building permits, so they cannot rebuild their homes. The US government won't allow insurance adjusters to take pictures or visit homes, so insurance payouts are still being processed. Residents are being sued for trying to build mobile homes on their own property. The banks are still charging mortgage payments, and with people falling behind on their payments, the banks are gonna repossess their land. Many Maui residents are being shuffled around from hotel to hotel. They can't unpack. They can't get settled, and they can even start building a new life almost half a year later. Maui's mayor, Josh Green, and the city council are trying to force Airbnb owners to convert their properties into long term rentals for displaced residents. Isn't that interesting, moving away from private ownership and leaving rentals as the only option. So much about the Lahaina fire situation gives 15 minute city vibes. It screams land grabs and marxism. It has Longman said that the Hawaiian Islands act as control groups and the Hawaiians as unwitting test subjects for the US government. As for the cause of the fire, we still don't have a cause. The official story was that the hurricane winds down at the power line, but the CEO of the local utility, Hawaiian Electric, says their power lines knocked down by the high winds appeared to have caused a fire that same morning of August 8th, but she said she was told by the Maui County Fire Department that it was put out, and that their company is not responsible for the fire that later swept Lahaina. So the fire department put it out, reported it to Hawaiian Electric, and then later we have a fire that destroys the entire town. So where did that fire come from?”

Wall Street Apes

637,956 просмотров • 2 лет назад

WOAH 🚨 Pay attention to this American pharmacist exposing that some cheap, very effective drugs, HAVE BEEN BANNED form being prescribed because they’re too cheap So instead of the cheap option, drugs that cost $1,000+ are allowed for certain treatments (INSANE) “The most insane examples of why drugs cost so much is a drug called Brenzavvy. You almost certainly haven't heard of it, but you've probably heard of similar drugs like Jardiance or Farxiga. The reason you haven't heard of Brenzavvy, though, is because no insurance companies will cover it. Most doctors won't prescribe it, and most wholesalers won't even carry it. When I tell you why our entire healthcare industry is turning its back on this proven drug in one of the most critical classes in existence, you are going to be furious. They are shunning Brenzavvy because it's too cheap. I'm not being hyperbolic or sensational. I mean it literally. At my pharmacy, Brenzavvy costs $60 bucks. When they took that price to the pharmacy benefits managers, or PBMs, that's the people in charge of deciding what's covered on your insurance, they all said no, because Brenzavvy can't do a rebate at a price that low. Farxiga and Jardiance, the other Drugs in the SLGT 2 class with Brenzavvy, cost insurance payers $1000 bucks each prescription up front. Then they get a big, probably like 40% rebate later. So that's a $400 rebate, and that is a huge selling point for the PBMs to prove how important they are. The PBMs get a piece of that rebate, and they get a percentage of the final price. An HHS report from last year said that the PBMs get 23% on average for for brand meds. After the rebate, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600. 23% of that is $138 for the middleman. Those drugs get dispensed 8 million times a year, which means the total they make in a year off of those two drugs is $1.1 billion. They don't make the drug, they don't prescribe it, they don't dispense it, they don't sell it. They only have to do one thing to make that money. Keep Brenzavvy off their list. If they let in a drug that costs 1/10 of the price and doesn't pay rebate, they literally lose a billion dollars a year. To me, that's the clearest example of why we will never get affordable health care in America. As long as we have PBMs involved, they can't afford to save you money.“ So while this might not be an outright ban, meaning illegal to create, for all purposes it is a ban. Because if the insurance companies won’t cover it, their doctors won’t prescribe it and nearly all wholesalers won’t carry it, that means the insurances companies and PBMs are effectively banning medication in America so they can make maximum profits. Billions a year on a single Medicine, when there are much cheaper options available for the customer This is organized crime. This is racketeering

Wall Street Apes

107,917 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remembering the great English actor, Sir Dirk Bogarde, on his 105th birthday! Dirk Bogarde on why it is important to make some pictures even though they don't make any money: "Interviewer: You’ve said that that fine film of yours, 'King And Country' (1964), wouldn’t pay your income tax. Presumably, it didn’t make much at the box office. Can the film industry afford to make these specialised subjects? Bogarde: All the films I make are on a percentage basis with a minimal salary because I believe this to be the only way to make pictures. After two years 'King And Country' hasn’t even covered its cost, which was only £81,000. The truth is, most people just didn’t want to go and see that type of picture. But I still think it was worth making for the small number that did. You can’t always make purely entertainment pictures, after all. The odd thing is that although 'King And Country' didn’t pay the rent, I won more awards for that than any other picture. And Tom Courtenay, of course, won the Venice Award for the Best Actor for his part. So you win awards, get the satisfaction of having done a good cinematic job, but you make no money. Because of this, however, I don’t see that we should stop making pictures for the minority groups. Of course the British film industry can’t afford them. But then, the films that we are making now are being financed by the Americans, anyway. The British will under-write only the sure-fire success; they’re afraid to take risks. That’s bad luck for us and the cinema-goers, too." (Dirk Bogarde's interview to Showtime, 1967)

Remembering the great English actor, Sir Dirk Bogarde, on his 105th birthday! Dirk Bogarde on why it is important to make some pictures even though they don't make any money: "Interviewer: You’ve said that that fine film of yours, 'King And Country' (1964), wouldn’t pay your income tax. Presumably, it didn’t make much at the box office. Can the film industry afford to make these specialised subjects? Bogarde: All the films I make are on a percentage basis with a minimal salary because I believe this to be the only way to make pictures. After two years 'King And Country' hasn’t even covered its cost, which was only £81,000. The truth is, most people just didn’t want to go and see that type of picture. But I still think it was worth making for the small number that did. You can’t always make purely entertainment pictures, after all. The odd thing is that although 'King And Country' didn’t pay the rent, I won more awards for that than any other picture. And Tom Courtenay, of course, won the Venice Award for the Best Actor for his part. So you win awards, get the satisfaction of having done a good cinematic job, but you make no money. Because of this, however, I don’t see that we should stop making pictures for the minority groups. Of course the British film industry can’t afford them. But then, the films that we are making now are being financed by the Americans, anyway. The British will under-write only the sure-fire success; they’re afraid to take risks. That’s bad luck for us and the cinema-goers, too." (Dirk Bogarde's interview to Showtime, 1967)

DepressedBergman

22,365 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This Should Be The Most Viral Video On X. It’s INSANITY That The US Government Is Trying To Pass Another $95 Billion Spending Bill For Foreign Countries & NOTHING FOR AMERICANS, NOTHING FOR MAUI Maui, Hawaii is NOT Forgotten ‼️ “I get asked all the time, how's the rebuilding going in Lahaina? We'll see for yourself. What is it? 5 months after the fire? Nothing's been done. No rebuilding. They put up some beautiful kids paintings right here to color, you know, to make it nice and bright with colors. But no rebuilding has started whatsoever. Meanwhile, people still have to pay mortgages and are getting eviction Notices. Even though their house burned down and they haven't gotten money from the insurance company yet because they're dragging their ****. Ridiculous.”

This Should Be The Most Viral Video On X. It’s INSANITY That The US Government Is Trying To Pass Another $95 Billion Spending Bill For Foreign Countries & NOTHING FOR AMERICANS, NOTHING FOR MAUI Maui, Hawaii is NOT Forgotten ‼️ “I get asked all the time, how's the rebuilding going in Lahaina? We'll see for yourself. What is it? 5 months after the fire? Nothing's been done. No rebuilding. They put up some beautiful kids paintings right here to color, you know, to make it nice and bright with colors. But no rebuilding has started whatsoever. Meanwhile, people still have to pay mortgages and are getting eviction Notices. Even though their house burned down and they haven't gotten money from the insurance company yet because they're dragging their ****. Ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

734,270 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Startup Archive

31,721 просмотров • 1 год назад

LAW ENFORCEMENT MUST MAKE A STAND AGAINST THE VIOLENT BLACK CULTURE Black teen takeovers are becoming more frequent….harsher consequences must be given. This isn’t “kids being kids.” It’s packs of feral black teenagers turning public parks into war zones…brawling, smashing windows, shooting each other, and terrorizing everyone else. Detroit residents are terrified for summer because this shit is now routine. We’ve seen the same mob chaos in Chicago, Philly, St. Louis, KC, and every other blue-run hellhole. The media calls it “teen takeovers” because they’re cowards. It’s black mob violence, enabled by Democrat DAs who won’t prosecute, parents who won’t parent, and a culture that treats accountability as “racist.” Enough. Charge them as adults. Make parents pay every dime of damage. Curfews, National Guard if necessary, and zero-tolerance policing. Stop coddling the chaos. We don’t have to live like this …but we will until the soft-on-crime experiment ends in handcuffs and consequences. No more excuses.

LAW ENFORCEMENT MUST MAKE A STAND AGAINST THE VIOLENT BLACK CULTURE Black teen takeovers are becoming more frequent….harsher consequences must be given. This isn’t “kids being kids.” It’s packs of feral black teenagers turning public parks into war zones…brawling, smashing windows, shooting each other, and terrorizing everyone else. Detroit residents are terrified for summer because this shit is now routine. We’ve seen the same mob chaos in Chicago, Philly, St. Louis, KC, and every other blue-run hellhole. The media calls it “teen takeovers” because they’re cowards. It’s black mob violence, enabled by Democrat DAs who won’t prosecute, parents who won’t parent, and a culture that treats accountability as “racist.” Enough. Charge them as adults. Make parents pay every dime of damage. Curfews, National Guard if necessary, and zero-tolerance policing. Stop coddling the chaos. We don’t have to live like this …but we will until the soft-on-crime experiment ends in handcuffs and consequences. No more excuses.

𝐌𝐑. 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 ™

13,793 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Zeudi: Thank you for following and supporting me all this time even though I haven’t really done anything and even if my content is basically nothing. It’s hard to understand why I have this support, and believe me, it’s not because of my sexuality—there are so many lesbians in this world, and probably on Twitch too. I want to say this to journalists, because apparently people are still saying that I exploit my sexuality. Anyway… They say: ‘She’s ugly, she can’t do anything.’ That’s what they say. Maybe because she’s a lesbian? What does that have to do with it? My goodness. But it’s fine like this. You see, there are many lesbians who stream but don’t reach the numbers I reach in Italy—then maybe abroad they reach numbers much higher than mine. I hope that one day there will be another woman who reaches the same goals as me, even being completely different from me, to show that someone can be appreciated regardless of everything. I also want to say hi to the Chambers! I want to greet Christina and Amber and invite them to do a live with me, because for example they’re amazing. They’re also lesbians, but that doesn’t mean they have success because they’re lesbians—it’s because people like them and because they’re great girls. They’re beautiful, and I like the way they live in the world, with their energy and the good vibes they give to everyone. So I always support other women, especially girls who work hard like them, and I’m really happy to know them through a screen—but I hope one day to meet them in person. I’m sending you a big hug. I know it was Cristina’s birthday and I wished her a happy birthday. Chat: Don’t forget to save the live. Zeudi: No, I won’t forget. How do you say it? I won’t forget the live. I don’t know, I think so. ‘Won’t’ is the negation of ‘will’? I don’t know. Yes, I won’t forget to save the live. See? I’m learning something. Guys, I’m heading off—thank you so much, everyone. See you at the next live. There’s also Patrizia Cavalli, thank you. I love you. A big kiss. Bye beauties. Good night or good morning, depending on your perspective and where you’re watching from. So, have a good day, good afternoon, and good night. ❤️❤️❤️

Zeudi: Thank you for following and supporting me all this time even though I haven’t really done anything and even if my content is basically nothing. It’s hard to understand why I have this support, and believe me, it’s not because of my sexuality—there are so many lesbians in this world, and probably on Twitch too. I want to say this to journalists, because apparently people are still saying that I exploit my sexuality. Anyway… They say: ‘She’s ugly, she can’t do anything.’ That’s what they say. Maybe because she’s a lesbian? What does that have to do with it? My goodness. But it’s fine like this. You see, there are many lesbians who stream but don’t reach the numbers I reach in Italy—then maybe abroad they reach numbers much higher than mine. I hope that one day there will be another woman who reaches the same goals as me, even being completely different from me, to show that someone can be appreciated regardless of everything. I also want to say hi to the Chambers! I want to greet Christina and Amber and invite them to do a live with me, because for example they’re amazing. They’re also lesbians, but that doesn’t mean they have success because they’re lesbians—it’s because people like them and because they’re great girls. They’re beautiful, and I like the way they live in the world, with their energy and the good vibes they give to everyone. So I always support other women, especially girls who work hard like them, and I’m really happy to know them through a screen—but I hope one day to meet them in person. I’m sending you a big hug. I know it was Cristina’s birthday and I wished her a happy birthday. Chat: Don’t forget to save the live. Zeudi: No, I won’t forget. How do you say it? I won’t forget the live. I don’t know, I think so. ‘Won’t’ is the negation of ‘will’? I don’t know. Yes, I won’t forget to save the live. See? I’m learning something. Guys, I’m heading off—thank you so much, everyone. See you at the next live. There’s also Patrizia Cavalli, thank you. I love you. A big kiss. Bye beauties. Good night or good morning, depending on your perspective and where you’re watching from. So, have a good day, good afternoon, and good night. ❤️❤️❤️

Korslayage

20,409 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “How does the United States intend to secure the oil fields? Won’t that take U.S. troops?” Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “Ultimately, this is not about securing the oil fields. This is about ensuring that no sanctioned oil can come in and out until they make changes to the governance of that entire industry.” “Because right now that industry is non-existent in the traditional way. These oil fields basically are pirate operations. People literally steal the oil from the ground, a handful of — that’s how they hold this regime together. A handful of cronies benefit from this oil — specific oil wells. They’re producing at like 18% capacity because the equipment is all decrepit and they basically pocket the money to their benefit. They sell the oil at a discount on global markets, you know 40 cents on the dollar, 50 cents on the dollar.” “But all that money goes to them. Those oil fields have not benefited the people of Venezuela in over a decade. But they have made multi-millionaires, billionaires out of just a handful of people. And that’s what’s held this regime together. That’s what needs to be addressed.”

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “How does the United States intend to secure the oil fields? Won’t that take U.S. troops?” Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “Ultimately, this is not about securing the oil fields. This is about ensuring that no sanctioned oil can come in and out until they make changes to the governance of that entire industry.” “Because right now that industry is non-existent in the traditional way. These oil fields basically are pirate operations. People literally steal the oil from the ground, a handful of — that’s how they hold this regime together. A handful of cronies benefit from this oil — specific oil wells. They’re producing at like 18% capacity because the equipment is all decrepit and they basically pocket the money to their benefit. They sell the oil at a discount on global markets, you know 40 cents on the dollar, 50 cents on the dollar.” “But all that money goes to them. Those oil fields have not benefited the people of Venezuela in over a decade. But they have made multi-millionaires, billionaires out of just a handful of people. And that’s what’s held this regime together. That’s what needs to be addressed.”

RedWave Press

835,023 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Hey Baron I’ll answer for Erika. As a mom that has kids and a husband who travels during the week and has kids in the bed occasionally…..my husband gets up early to get on flights. 2 or 3 am. I may hear my husband when he gets up but usually I just go back to sleep. With or without the kids in the bed. I don’t get up with him. As a matter of fact he hates it when I do. He says it makes it harder to leave because I tell him I wish he didn’t have to go and I’ll miss him and it breaks his heart to leave. Yea I admit it I do make it hard for him to leave. But then he texts me when he gets to the airport and when he lands and all during the day. And at night we FaceTime. Do you know that Erika and Charlie didn’t have this kind of relationship? No you don’t. Because you weren’t there. How do you know that this doesn’t destroy her that she didn’t get up with him that morning? Do you have cameras on her 24/7? You are truly an unbelievable asshole. But anything to keep the hate going right? And of course since you are a failed attorney you need as many clicks as you can get to pay your bills. Gotta pay those bills. Money over morals. I can’t wait until trial when all your BS lies are debunked. Your fall will be epic and well deserved. I don’t know how you sleep at night knowing one day you’ll have to answer for everything you’ve done to this woman by God. Hope you have a good excuse ready. But if I were you I’d be a little worried about my soul.

Hey Baron I’ll answer for Erika. As a mom that has kids and a husband who travels during the week and has kids in the bed occasionally…..my husband gets up early to get on flights. 2 or 3 am. I may hear my husband when he gets up but usually I just go back to sleep. With or without the kids in the bed. I don’t get up with him. As a matter of fact he hates it when I do. He says it makes it harder to leave because I tell him I wish he didn’t have to go and I’ll miss him and it breaks his heart to leave. Yea I admit it I do make it hard for him to leave. But then he texts me when he gets to the airport and when he lands and all during the day. And at night we FaceTime. Do you know that Erika and Charlie didn’t have this kind of relationship? No you don’t. Because you weren’t there. How do you know that this doesn’t destroy her that she didn’t get up with him that morning? Do you have cameras on her 24/7? You are truly an unbelievable asshole. But anything to keep the hate going right? And of course since you are a failed attorney you need as many clicks as you can get to pay your bills. Gotta pay those bills. Money over morals. I can’t wait until trial when all your BS lies are debunked. Your fall will be epic and well deserved. I don’t know how you sleep at night knowing one day you’ll have to answer for everything you’ve done to this woman by God. Hope you have a good excuse ready. But if I were you I’d be a little worried about my soul.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

49,709 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

You can’t argue that President Trump is not trying to fix our election system, but he needs the Republicans to get on board. While speaking to Republican senators this morning, POTUS made his case for terminating the filibuster so that we can pass voter ID, no mail-in voting and “pass all the things that we want to pass to make our elections safe and secure.” He said that if we don’t terminate the filibuster, then they won’t be able to pass any legislation and the Democrats will take power - and then they will remove the filibuster anyways and basically we will be screwed forever. He has a point. We are at the point that we need to use any means necessary - to save the Republic. Without free and fair elections, our country is gone. As Trump says in this clip, “it’s time for Republicans to do what they have to do.”

You can’t argue that President Trump is not trying to fix our election system, but he needs the Republicans to get on board. While speaking to Republican senators this morning, POTUS made his case for terminating the filibuster so that we can pass voter ID, no mail-in voting and “pass all the things that we want to pass to make our elections safe and secure.” He said that if we don’t terminate the filibuster, then they won’t be able to pass any legislation and the Democrats will take power - and then they will remove the filibuster anyways and basically we will be screwed forever. He has a point. We are at the point that we need to use any means necessary - to save the Republic. Without free and fair elections, our country is gone. As Trump says in this clip, “it’s time for Republicans to do what they have to do.”

TheStormHasArrived

46,978 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie just exposed that Trump is threatening to “ruin” his supporters’ businesses if they fund his campaign. “I’m not talking about IRS audits.” “It’s bigger than that.” “Here’s what happens behind the scenes … ” First, Trump allies are coercing Massie’s consultants into quitting his re-election campaign: “Three of my consultants have quit on my campaign, all three for the same reason.” “They were told: your other 30 clients will fire you if you keep working for Massie.” “They make it hard to hire people.” “I really love the consultants I got now, because they’re the ones who said: screw you, I’m gonna work for Massie brcause I believe in what he’s doing, and I’m good enough at my job, I’ll go find some other clients if you clowns fire me.” Second, Trump allies are threatening to “ruin” Massie supporters’ businesses by abusing state power: “I’ve got 15,000 donors across the United States. My average donation is $80.” “Is that because I don’t want millionaires to give to a super PAC and to help me?” “No. I’ll take all the help I can get.” “The problem is, if you’ve reached some degree of success where you have a million-dollar disposable income, you probably can’t afford to tick off this administration, or they will come at your business.” “You won’t get the permits you need to do the business.” “Over the MAGA split and on foreign policy, there are people of great means … who could put money in my race and post up against the Israel First billionaires.” “But they’re staying on the sidelines, because their business will get ruined.” This is why Marjorie Taylor Greene left Washington. The Trump administration is abusing its power and influence to crush populist, America First voices in the Republican Party. Jimmy Dore Thomas Massie Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Thomas Massie just exposed that Trump is threatening to “ruin” his supporters’ businesses if they fund his campaign. “I’m not talking about IRS audits.” “It’s bigger than that.” “Here’s what happens behind the scenes … ” First, Trump allies are coercing Massie’s consultants into quitting his re-election campaign: “Three of my consultants have quit on my campaign, all three for the same reason.” “They were told: your other 30 clients will fire you if you keep working for Massie.” “They make it hard to hire people.” “I really love the consultants I got now, because they’re the ones who said: screw you, I’m gonna work for Massie brcause I believe in what he’s doing, and I’m good enough at my job, I’ll go find some other clients if you clowns fire me.” Second, Trump allies are threatening to “ruin” Massie supporters’ businesses by abusing state power: “I’ve got 15,000 donors across the United States. My average donation is $80.” “Is that because I don’t want millionaires to give to a super PAC and to help me?” “No. I’ll take all the help I can get.” “The problem is, if you’ve reached some degree of success where you have a million-dollar disposable income, you probably can’t afford to tick off this administration, or they will come at your business.” “You won’t get the permits you need to do the business.” “Over the MAGA split and on foreign policy, there are people of great means … who could put money in my race and post up against the Israel First billionaires.” “But they’re staying on the sidelines, because their business will get ruined.” This is why Marjorie Taylor Greene left Washington. The Trump administration is abusing its power and influence to crush populist, America First voices in the Republican Party. Jimmy Dore Thomas Massie Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Holden Culotta

2,145,623 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A year ago, I was moved to tears when govt agreed to consult on Council Tax debt collection. I’m reposting that video as today IT'S DONE. On the back of Money and Mental Health campaigning the govt said this morning it WILL change the rules - Currently miss a monthly payment & within 3 weeks, you can be told "pay the whole year". From Apr 27, Councils must wait 63 days to do that & signpost people to help meantime - The max added admin cost is also being capped at £100 Here’s my official quote on it…. “Council Tax debt collection is so aggressive it’d make banks blush. It’s the most vicious and damaging form of legal debt collection out there - causing counterproductive misery for millions. We’ve spent the last 18 months campaigning hard to change this hideous system, and having seen so much pain caused by it, I’m genuinely moved by this huge first step towards making things better.” “Currently, in England, if you miss a monthly payment, many councils, within usually 3 weeks, demand payment for the entire year. How people who can’t find a month’s money are expected to find a year’s I don’t know. Yet if they can’t pay, within just three more weeks, they are often taken to court, have ‘admin costs’ added, and soon see bailiffs sent in. No commercial firm would be allowed to do anything close - constituents are treated worse than customers.” The new rule from next April means councils must wait two months, not 3 weeks, to ask for a year’s money, and the ‘admin costs’ will be capped at £100. In a perfect world, it would be even longer and the lower cap would apply, but this is still a hugely welcome change to a 33-year-old process. For councils too, it is worth remembering that this grotesque system is often catastrophic for people’s finances and wellbeing, leaving many needing more help and support, and ultimately the same council having to pick up the pieces.” last May. Today ITS DONE! Govt has announced

A year ago, I was moved to tears when govt agreed to consult on Council Tax debt collection. I’m reposting that video as today IT'S DONE. On the back of Money and Mental Health campaigning the govt said this morning it WILL change the rules - Currently miss a monthly payment & within 3 weeks, you can be told "pay the whole year". From Apr 27, Councils must wait 63 days to do that & signpost people to help meantime - The max added admin cost is also being capped at £100 Here’s my official quote on it…. “Council Tax debt collection is so aggressive it’d make banks blush. It’s the most vicious and damaging form of legal debt collection out there - causing counterproductive misery for millions. We’ve spent the last 18 months campaigning hard to change this hideous system, and having seen so much pain caused by it, I’m genuinely moved by this huge first step towards making things better.” “Currently, in England, if you miss a monthly payment, many councils, within usually 3 weeks, demand payment for the entire year. How people who can’t find a month’s money are expected to find a year’s I don’t know. Yet if they can’t pay, within just three more weeks, they are often taken to court, have ‘admin costs’ added, and soon see bailiffs sent in. No commercial firm would be allowed to do anything close - constituents are treated worse than customers.” The new rule from next April means councils must wait two months, not 3 weeks, to ask for a year’s money, and the ‘admin costs’ will be capped at £100. In a perfect world, it would be even longer and the lower cap would apply, but this is still a hugely welcome change to a 33-year-old process. For councils too, it is worth remembering that this grotesque system is often catastrophic for people’s finances and wellbeing, leaving many needing more help and support, and ultimately the same council having to pick up the pieces.” last May. Today ITS DONE! Govt has announced

Martin Lewis

345,429 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 PROVIDENCE FIRE CHIEF: "RESCUE TASK FORCE DEPLOYED, VICTIMS STILL BEING FOUND" Fire Chief Derek Silva just briefed on the chaos at Waterman and Thayer streets. His exact words: "As mentioned previously, at 4.05 p.m., we were dispatched to the area of Waterman and Thayer for an active shooter incident where our firefighter is known as a Rescue Task Force linked up with Providence Police with 2 operational locations at Waterman and Thayer and Waterman and Holt. Rescue Task Force is a firefighter that wears body armor and has ability to stop any shooting wounds and make sure that any victims are extricated quickly. With the assistance of police in neighboring cities and towns, eight people were transported, as the mayor mentioned, critical but stable condition, and two, unfortunately, were dead on arrival. We have a total of 10 victims, but as I caution everyone, this is a developing incident, and we are still actively searching the buildings along with province police to make sure that everyone has gone home safe and that there is no one else that needs our assistance." Scene's still hot, cops and firefighters sweeping buildings for more victims or threats. Prayers for Providence tonight. Source: Fox News

🇺🇸 PROVIDENCE FIRE CHIEF: "RESCUE TASK FORCE DEPLOYED, VICTIMS STILL BEING FOUND" Fire Chief Derek Silva just briefed on the chaos at Waterman and Thayer streets. His exact words: "As mentioned previously, at 4.05 p.m., we were dispatched to the area of Waterman and Thayer for an active shooter incident where our firefighter is known as a Rescue Task Force linked up with Providence Police with 2 operational locations at Waterman and Thayer and Waterman and Holt. Rescue Task Force is a firefighter that wears body armor and has ability to stop any shooting wounds and make sure that any victims are extricated quickly. With the assistance of police in neighboring cities and towns, eight people were transported, as the mayor mentioned, critical but stable condition, and two, unfortunately, were dead on arrival. We have a total of 10 victims, but as I caution everyone, this is a developing incident, and we are still actively searching the buildings along with province police to make sure that everyone has gone home safe and that there is no one else that needs our assistance." Scene's still hot, cops and firefighters sweeping buildings for more victims or threats. Prayers for Providence tonight. Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

125,815 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Batya Ungar-Sargon took on the entire CNN panel over the Maduro raid — and cut right through their hysteria. As Abby Phillip and the liberal panel spiraled over Trump’s next moves in Venezuela, Batya Ungar-Sargon looked directly at Democrat Rep. Jason Crow and reminded him that this is NOT Afghanistan. PHILLIP: “Batya, I just wonder, first of all, A, how is he going to make sure that the country is quote, unquote run properly?” “And B is that now on the table, boots on the ground in Venezuela again, beyond just the operation to get Maduro out?” UNGAR-SARGON: “It’s very funny to me because it seems like you guys are acting like because a simple operation, that was very successful, could have accomplished many goals, therefore it couldn’t have accomplished any of them.” Then she turned to Democrat Rep. Jason Crow. “I say this with all due respect, sir, I’m so grateful to you for the service you’ve provided to this country. But Venezuela is NOT Afghanistan.” “25 years ago, there was a functioning democracy there. It’s just apples and oranges to compare it. There is NO WAY Donald Trump is going to put boots on the ground there.” “That’s what the ships are there for, to not have to do that!” “What they’re doing right now is beyond brilliant because instead of rushing in and appointing Maria Machado, for example, they’re saying, let’s wait and see where the Venezuelan people are at.” “Let’s wait until we can have an election. You can’t just do that overnight!” “And so they are sitting there and watching and calibrating and making sure, by the way, that the Venezuelan people, as well as now the new president, understand that whatever they do, this better be good for the United States because we’re not afraid to use our power anymore.”

Batya Ungar-Sargon took on the entire CNN panel over the Maduro raid — and cut right through their hysteria. As Abby Phillip and the liberal panel spiraled over Trump’s next moves in Venezuela, Batya Ungar-Sargon looked directly at Democrat Rep. Jason Crow and reminded him that this is NOT Afghanistan. PHILLIP: “Batya, I just wonder, first of all, A, how is he going to make sure that the country is quote, unquote run properly?” “And B is that now on the table, boots on the ground in Venezuela again, beyond just the operation to get Maduro out?” UNGAR-SARGON: “It’s very funny to me because it seems like you guys are acting like because a simple operation, that was very successful, could have accomplished many goals, therefore it couldn’t have accomplished any of them.” Then she turned to Democrat Rep. Jason Crow. “I say this with all due respect, sir, I’m so grateful to you for the service you’ve provided to this country. But Venezuela is NOT Afghanistan.” “25 years ago, there was a functioning democracy there. It’s just apples and oranges to compare it. There is NO WAY Donald Trump is going to put boots on the ground there.” “That’s what the ships are there for, to not have to do that!” “What they’re doing right now is beyond brilliant because instead of rushing in and appointing Maria Machado, for example, they’re saying, let’s wait and see where the Venezuelan people are at.” “Let’s wait until we can have an election. You can’t just do that overnight!” “And so they are sitting there and watching and calibrating and making sure, by the way, that the Venezuelan people, as well as now the new president, understand that whatever they do, this better be good for the United States because we’re not afraid to use our power anymore.”

Overton

306,222 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Trump claims tariffs will make America rich again, but that’s not how it works. Tariffs aren’t paid by other countries—they’re paid by Americans. It’s not a tax on countries like China; it’s a tax on the stuff we buy. Here’s how it works: when the government puts a tariff on something, it raises the price of that product. The idea is to make imported goods more expensive so people buy American-made products instead. Sounds good, right? The problem is, most things we use in the U.S. are made overseas, and it would take years—or even decades—to make them here. And in some cases, it might never happen because it costs too much to produce those goods locally. For example, if something costs $50 and a tariff adds $5, the new price is $55. That extra cost comes out of your pocket. This can cause inflation, making everything more expensive, and people either stop buying or have to spend more because there are no cheaper options. So, who gets the money from tariffs? The U.S. government collects it, but it’s not paid by China or any other country. It’s paid by you—the American consumer. The U.S. can’t tax other countries directly, so the burden falls on taxpayers here. Tariffs can work if the product being taxed is already made in the U.S. For example, if China floods the market with super-cheap goods that hurt local manufacturers, tariffs can make those imports more expensive, giving American businesses a chance to compete. But slapping tariffs on goods we don’t make here—or won’t make for years—just makes things more expensive for everyone. That’s why no president has wanted to be known as a "tariff president." They knew tariffs are really just taxes on Americans and can backfire politically. If tariffs drive up prices and hurt voters’ wallets, it could mean big trouble in the next election. Republicans might certainly lose in 2026.

Trump claims tariffs will make America rich again, but that’s not how it works. Tariffs aren’t paid by other countries—they’re paid by Americans. It’s not a tax on countries like China; it’s a tax on the stuff we buy. Here’s how it works: when the government puts a tariff on something, it raises the price of that product. The idea is to make imported goods more expensive so people buy American-made products instead. Sounds good, right? The problem is, most things we use in the U.S. are made overseas, and it would take years—or even decades—to make them here. And in some cases, it might never happen because it costs too much to produce those goods locally. For example, if something costs $50 and a tariff adds $5, the new price is $55. That extra cost comes out of your pocket. This can cause inflation, making everything more expensive, and people either stop buying or have to spend more because there are no cheaper options. So, who gets the money from tariffs? The U.S. government collects it, but it’s not paid by China or any other country. It’s paid by you—the American consumer. The U.S. can’t tax other countries directly, so the burden falls on taxpayers here. Tariffs can work if the product being taxed is already made in the U.S. For example, if China floods the market with super-cheap goods that hurt local manufacturers, tariffs can make those imports more expensive, giving American businesses a chance to compete. But slapping tariffs on goods we don’t make here—or won’t make for years—just makes things more expensive for everyone. That’s why no president has wanted to be known as a "tariff president." They knew tariffs are really just taxes on Americans and can backfire politically. If tariffs drive up prices and hurt voters’ wallets, it could mean big trouble in the next election. Republicans might certainly lose in 2026.

Simon Ateba

50,084 просмотров • 1 год назад

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

12,957 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

VIDEO: It's A Painful Experience – Pastor Reacts After Fire Guts Household of David Church The Senior Pastor of Household of David Church, Lagos, Olusola Osunmakinde, has reacted to the Wednesday fire that burnt down the entire church auditorium, saying "It is a painful experience." According to Osunmakinde, someone who walked into the church premises mocked him by asking, "Where was Jesus when this happened?" The pastor spoke in a video shared on the church’s Instagram account a few hours after the incident occurred. The Household of David Church which is located on Surulere Road, Ikeja Local Government Area of Lagos State reportedly caught fire, and property worth millions of naira were destroyed. The Lagos State Fire Service spokesperson, Amodu Shakiri, disclosed to our correspondent that the church’s auditorium ceiling was overheating, which caused the ceiling to collapse and ignite a fire. The church programme tagged, 'Mercy Conference', was to start today, January 31, 2024 before the church was engulfed by fire. Osunmakinde stated that the church air conditioners, chairs, and other equipment were all burnt. He said, “As we know, 'Mercy Conference' starts today, but something happened that I just want to put a message out there to people. "I came here this morning, everybody was setting up, everything was going fine. All of a sudden, we started hearing that there was fire and something up there on the roof of the church. "I know there would be reactions, and people will say that and that, but that is none of my concern now. The most important thing is this, we thank God no life was lost and we thank God for everything. "We are not too discouraged but we believe in God that we will still go on with the conference. "To everyone out there, we are not sad, we are happy for all things work together, the Bible didn't say all good things, all things both bad and ugly. "It is a painful experience no doubt, even someone walked into the compound mocking, saying 'where is Jesus when this happened?' We don't owe people an answer, all we believe is that all things work together. "We will know what to do about the building and every prayer, every contribution, every word is necessary now. Today's meeting goes on this evening if we have to lift our hands and worship outside we will do it. "We will not back out because of this but by the grace of God, all things work together for good." Credit: Instagram | hodchurch ---- Follow us for more breaking news and videos

VIDEO: It's A Painful Experience – Pastor Reacts After Fire Guts Household of David Church The Senior Pastor of Household of David Church, Lagos, Olusola Osunmakinde, has reacted to the Wednesday fire that burnt down the entire church auditorium, saying "It is a painful experience." According to Osunmakinde, someone who walked into the church premises mocked him by asking, "Where was Jesus when this happened?" The pastor spoke in a video shared on the church’s Instagram account a few hours after the incident occurred. The Household of David Church which is located on Surulere Road, Ikeja Local Government Area of Lagos State reportedly caught fire, and property worth millions of naira were destroyed. The Lagos State Fire Service spokesperson, Amodu Shakiri, disclosed to our correspondent that the church’s auditorium ceiling was overheating, which caused the ceiling to collapse and ignite a fire. The church programme tagged, 'Mercy Conference', was to start today, January 31, 2024 before the church was engulfed by fire. Osunmakinde stated that the church air conditioners, chairs, and other equipment were all burnt. He said, “As we know, 'Mercy Conference' starts today, but something happened that I just want to put a message out there to people. "I came here this morning, everybody was setting up, everything was going fine. All of a sudden, we started hearing that there was fire and something up there on the roof of the church. "I know there would be reactions, and people will say that and that, but that is none of my concern now. The most important thing is this, we thank God no life was lost and we thank God for everything. "We are not too discouraged but we believe in God that we will still go on with the conference. "To everyone out there, we are not sad, we are happy for all things work together, the Bible didn't say all good things, all things both bad and ugly. "It is a painful experience no doubt, even someone walked into the compound mocking, saying 'where is Jesus when this happened?' We don't owe people an answer, all we believe is that all things work together. "We will know what to do about the building and every prayer, every contribution, every word is necessary now. Today's meeting goes on this evening if we have to lift our hands and worship outside we will do it. "We will not back out because of this but by the grace of God, all things work together for good." Credit: Instagram | hodchurch ---- Follow us for more breaking news and videos

Punch Newspapers

123,647 просмотров • 2 лет назад