Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5 $1.80 vs $4.20

shiri_shh's profile picture

shirish

43,579 subscribers

232,310 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60
0:48

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

304,002 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:42

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

124,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.
0:28

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.

OmedTheVibeCoder

12,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5
0:26

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5

K2S

22,470 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Replit Free Mode vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5 I asked each of them to create a Subway Surfer clone. Which one wins for you?
6:59

Replit Free Mode vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5 I asked each of them to create a Subway Surfer clone. Which one wins for you?

Poonam Soni

37,745 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?
0:39

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?

Mario Nawfal

102,885 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.
0:33

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.

OmedTheVibeCoder

16,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
0:27

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Lisan al Gaib

265,203 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇
0:20

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇

Poonam Soni

37,910 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:
1:01

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:

Arena.ai

58,591 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5
0:54

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5

Tim Jayas

30,127 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below
0:28

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below

Sughu

11,338 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.
1:58

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.

Mckay Wrigley

289,594 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65
0:32

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65

Madni Aghadi

39,314 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6
0:49

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6

Okara

80,558 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:34

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

308,727 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
0:40

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

56,360 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!
0:48

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)
6:13

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)

Box

609,573 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10
0:30

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Alican Kiraz

29,434 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten