Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5 $1.80 vs $4.20

shiri_shh's profile picture

shirish

43,545 subscribers

228,887 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60
0:48

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

303,468 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:42

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

98,622 просмотров • 3 дней назад

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?
0:39

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?

Mario Nawfal

58,117 просмотров • 13 часов назад

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
0:27

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Lisan al Gaib

265,203 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:
1:01

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:

Arena.ai

58,591 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5
0:54

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5

Tim Jayas

28,031 просмотров • 4 дней назад

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below
0:28

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below

Sughu

11,338 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.
1:58

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.

Mckay Wrigley

289,217 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65
0:32

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65

Madni Aghadi

39,221 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6
0:49

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6

Okara

80,558 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:34

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

298,290 просмотров • 3 дней назад

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!
0:48

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)
6:13

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)

Box

609,573 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10
0:30

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Alican Kiraz

29,434 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz
0:30

Fable vs Opus 5 Made using Seedance 2 on HeyOz

Ahad Shams

47,498 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.
0:23

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

53,313 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Grok 1 vs Grok 2 vs Grok 3
0:35

Grok 1 vs Grok 2 vs Grok 3

Rajabets 🇮🇳👑

208,823 просмотров • 1 год назад

Grok 4.20 Coming soon • Grok Imagine
0:30

Grok 4.20 Coming soon • Grok Imagine

𝐋.𝐘.𝐍

46,985 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Grok 4.6 (grok-4.5 in Arena) different reasoning effort outputs vs Grok 4.5 High maybe reasoning effort are wrongly placed but all the outputs are from Grok 4.6 model is improved alot from 4.5 🔥🔥 > Indian Railways WDP-4D dual-cab diesel locomotive model using three js
0:49

Grok 4.6 (grok-4.5 in Arena) different reasoning effort outputs vs Grok 4.5 High maybe reasoning effort are wrongly placed but all the outputs are from Grok 4.6 model is improved alot from 4.5 🔥🔥 > Indian Railways WDP-4D dual-cab diesel locomotive model using three js

Harshith

19,270 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Someone ran this test Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Select your model wisely!
1:01

Someone ran this test Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Select your model wisely!

0xMarioNawfal

73,224 просмотров • 1 месяц назад