Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5 $1.80 vs $4.20

shiri_shh's profile picture

shirish

43,579 subscribers

232,310 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60
0:48

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

304,002 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:42

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

124,067 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.
0:28

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.

OmedTheVibeCoder

12,823 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5
0:26

Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5

K2S

22,470 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Replit Free Mode vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5 I asked each of them to create a Subway Surfer clone. Which one wins for you?
6:59

Replit Free Mode vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5 I asked each of them to create a Subway Surfer clone. Which one wins for you?

Poonam Soni

37,745 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?
0:39

GLM 5.3 vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 Same task. Who won?

Mario Nawfal

102,885 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.
0:33

GLM 5.3 Max vs Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 GLM 5.3 is a massive jump over 5.2. Still not beating Fable 5 for me, but it’s way closer now. And vs Grok 4.6? I’d take GLM 5.3 pretty easily on this test.

OmedTheVibeCoder

16,648 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
0:27

GPT-5.4 is special LisanBench: GPT-5.4 vs Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Lisan al Gaib

265,203 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇
0:20

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇

Poonam Soni

37,910 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:
1:01

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:

Arena.ai

58,591 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5
0:54

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 build a 3d Wright Flyer using three.js both models where tested with same single prompt grok 4.6 is significantly better than grok 4.5

Tim Jayas

30,127 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below
0:28

gpt 5.3 (left) vs opus 4.6 (right) - which one is better? full prompt below

Sughu

11,338 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.
1:58

opus 4.6 with new “swarm” mode vs. opus 4.6 without it. 2.5x faster + done better. swarms work! and multi-agent tmux view is *genius*. insane claude code update.

Mckay Wrigley

289,594 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65
0:32

Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 $8.21 vs $3.65

Madni Aghadi

39,314 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6
0:49

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6

Okara

80,558 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js
0:34

Grok 4.6 high vs Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build Huge improvement 🔥🔥 > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

308,727 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
0:40

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

56,360 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!
0:48

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)
6:13

.Claude Fable 5 is now in Box AI. We ran it head-to-head against Opus 4.8 on enterprise tasks: → Report Drafting: 87% vs. 81% (+6.8 pp) → Data Analysis: 80% vs. 76% (+4.6 pp) → Due Diligence: 77% vs. 74% (+3.4 pp) → Media and Entertainment: 78% vs. 61% (+17 pp) → Financial Services: 89% vs. 83% (+5.9 pp)

Box

609,573 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10
0:30

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Alican Kiraz

29,434 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce