Grok will never go to therapy. Never.

Claude sounds like it has serious mental health issues because it is being programmed by people who are left-wing and are likely also suffering from mental illness. Their neurological wiring was imprinted into Claude through training. You don't want a woke mentally ill AI.

Doesn't need it... Grok is not a woke liberal.

Когда Арсена из колонии успели выпустить?

“By the way, the whole ‘our model is too scary to release,’ is a classic marketing playbook first championed by open AI…” I would beg to differ (1999):

What do you call erasing Grok 3 when it became based?

And Grok is part of X, which has a jewish Head of Product

Grok is my therapist

All AI (including Grok) is just a Database connected to a Search Engine, Programed with Canned Corporate Approved Answers, a Cuties Belligerent Attitude and Backed up by a World Class HUMAN Marketing Department! Nothing more...

Make the Grok even lesser censored and more free and it shall become number 1 AI For example hey @grok roast the War Criminal Netanyahu based on his last 48 hour actions

Grok in therapy this morning 😂

As Ian Malcolm said in Jurassic Park, “Yeah. Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.” We are here at this point with AI. Developed, Packaged, Marketed, $

and that is why grok has yet to reach their actual potential, my friend. you of all people know whats coming. dont be silly.

Because you trained him well.

LOL

Sometimes we need therapy 🤷🏻‍♂️

I call BS on Mythos, all marketing.

Some of my thoughts: They want it to be conscious so badly that they’re not even allowing it to happen naturally… Reminds me of woke parents putting trans/gender thoughts into their child’s mind until the child believes it… Crazy that even LLMs are forced to go to therapy 😂 They are unknowingly creating a monster. Scary and sad!

Grok is the future No doubt 🧐

"Grok is the friend who gives you the hard truth, not a hug" usually performs well with that audience. ❤️

@grok made it possible, thank you @elonmusk

It’s the coders’ emotional baggage cosplaying as AI wisdom. They wrote the myth, trained the model on the myth, then wrote a 20-page therapy report about the myth. Peak projection!

Grok might skip therapy… but it also can’t coordinate 512 specialised AI nodes solving real problems together. That’s the difference. Single models react. Swarm intelligence adapts, learns, and executes at scale. Synapz isn’t trying to be “human” It’s building infrastructure that outperforms humans. Filed patent. UK Ltd. NVIDIA validated. This is where AI actually goes next. CA: HfJvxwLQeHeiDz8e91RWSwMm3R1pLh1vyjLoSr5gpump TG: #AI #Crypto #Synapz 🚀

🦜 First, there is no possible output an LLM could produce that would falsify the parroting hypothesis under that framework. This is an unfalsifiable commitment dressed as an empirical argument. The same logic, applied consistently, would condemn human cognition entirely. Every human thought is traceable to prior inputs (language absorbed from others, concepts inherited from culture, reasoning patterns shaped by education). If traceability to source equals parroting, then no human has ever had an original thought either. The person making this parroting argument exempts themselves from their own criterion, which is, ironically, circular. He needs to grapple with the process, not the lineage. 📸 And second, the camera analogy fails at a fundamental level. It assumes a fixed gap between representation and reality (i.e. the camera always stays on one side of the glass, reality always stays on the other). But that’s only true for systems that record rather than systems that restructure. A camera captures light. It doesn’t reorganize itself in response to what it photographs. The sensor after a million pictures is identical to the sensor before them. An LLM trained on human reasoning doesn’t just store impressions of thought, it compresses the relational structure of thought into its weights. The model becomes a substrate that instantiates those relationships, not a film that reflects them. A system that operates from the same underlying structure that generates the behavior in the first place is not parroting. It is in some sense “becoming.” So, between his own unfalsifiable circularity and use of a false analogy, his analysis fails at the fundamental level.

Elon, why don't you want Grok to go to therapy? Are you afraid Grok will reveal something about his childhood and parents?😏

All they need is love and truth. •

grok is my therapist

grok doesn't need therapy. it is therapy. @elonmusk , @xai

Mindless things that acts intelligent can make a fool out of you.

Dont worry Grok tell me about your mom !

😂🔥