Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

$GRT looks ridiculously clean here. Multi-year falling wedge. Back at wedge support. Weekly RSI bottoming. That’s classic reversal structure. And the kicker? DTCC. If institutional rails start using Graph indexing (AMP framework), that’s REAL usage. REAL demand. TA and fundamentals aligned. Watching GRT closely.

Merlijn The Trader

429,253 subscribers

44,400 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Bitcoin dumped to $72,000 for a reason. $BTC has just confirmed its approach to the MACRO support line. Most people think the drop will last much longer. But structurally, this is the most bullish pattern of the cycle. $72K -> $74K -> $77K -> $85K The selloff from the local highs already wiped out overleveraged longs. Now PANIC sellers are jumping in right at MACRO support. That’s exactly where market makers usually reverse the move. Most traders are focused on the breakdown. But they completely ignore the bigger wedge structure still holding underneath. One final flush below support is still possible. And if that happens, it will likely become the fuel for a violent SHORT SQUEEZE back toward the $77K wedge resistance. This is how Bitcoin has trapped traders for years. - Panic at support. - Then expansion higher. I’ll keep updating this setup here every day. When I fully exit the markets, I’ll post it publicly here like I always do. Turn notifications on. You’ll want to see this before everyone else does.

Bitcoin dumped to $72,000 for a reason. $BTC has just confirmed its approach to the MACRO support line. Most people think the drop will last much longer. But structurally, this is the most bullish pattern of the cycle. $72K -> $74K -> $77K -> $85K The selloff from the local highs already wiped out overleveraged longs. Now PANIC sellers are jumping in right at MACRO support. That’s exactly where market makers usually reverse the move. Most traders are focused on the breakdown. But they completely ignore the bigger wedge structure still holding underneath. One final flush below support is still possible. And if that happens, it will likely become the fuel for a violent SHORT SQUEEZE back toward the $77K wedge resistance. This is how Bitcoin has trapped traders for years. - Panic at support. - Then expansion higher. I’ll keep updating this setup here every day. When I fully exit the markets, I’ll post it publicly here like I always do. Turn notifications on. You’ll want to see this before everyone else does.

DANNY

275,472 views • 2 months ago

Memes are dead. At least in the way we used to know them. Anything with no utility, no real users, no real economy & revenue is cooked: $PNUT: -96% from ATH $WIF: -92% from ATH $GIGA: -93% from ATH Others: -99% from ATH So what’s the next meta? I think I've figured it out... Right now everyone is bouncing between 2 extremes: a) “Everything is a scam. Utility doesn’t exist.” b) “Memes are dead. Only insiders make money. There will never be another PEPE or DOGE/SHIB level adoption.” In reality, only one type of project will survive this environment: tokens with real revenue, real usage, real communities - e.g. HYPE/PUMP type model. Given this sentiment, 99% of altcoins won’t pump. (at least short/mid term) And the era of pure memes is also finished. But there’s one category that actually makes sense here: Memes with Web2 roots and real communities behind them. It gives memes what they always lacked - real revenue, real distribution, real users, which brings real adoption and goes outside of web3 And this all without pretending to be some fake “utility coin” which nobody believes in rn. And I think I finally found the project that nails this perfectly, and is not yet launched. RaveDAO RaveDAO is the first Meme 2.0 ecosystem that’s actually built on real culture, real users, and real economics. Over 100K people attended their IRL events this year and transacted on-chain. This is exactly the kind of hybrid model that fits the market’s demand: cultural virality + real world revenue + on-chain distribution. - Web2 partnerships with top global artists - Web3 integrations with 50+ major partners - 7-figure revenue - No VC pressure - Real on-chain adoption through ticketing and stablecoin payments That’s why I’m partnering with them - and why I’ll be watching closely.

Memes are dead. At least in the way we used to know them. Anything with no utility, no real users, no real economy & revenue is cooked: $PNUT: -96% from ATH $WIF: -92% from ATH $GIGA: -93% from ATH Others: -99% from ATH So what’s the next meta? I think I've figured it out... Right now everyone is bouncing between 2 extremes: a) “Everything is a scam. Utility doesn’t exist.” b) “Memes are dead. Only insiders make money. There will never be another PEPE or DOGE/SHIB level adoption.” In reality, only one type of project will survive this environment: tokens with real revenue, real usage, real communities - e.g. HYPE/PUMP type model. Given this sentiment, 99% of altcoins won’t pump. (at least short/mid term) And the era of pure memes is also finished. But there’s one category that actually makes sense here: Memes with Web2 roots and real communities behind them. It gives memes what they always lacked - real revenue, real distribution, real users, which brings real adoption and goes outside of web3 And this all without pretending to be some fake “utility coin” which nobody believes in rn. And I think I finally found the project that nails this perfectly, and is not yet launched. RaveDAO RaveDAO is the first Meme 2.0 ecosystem that’s actually built on real culture, real users, and real economics. Over 100K people attended their IRL events this year and transacted on-chain. This is exactly the kind of hybrid model that fits the market’s demand: cultural virality + real world revenue + on-chain distribution. - Web2 partnerships with top global artists - Web3 integrations with 50+ major partners - 7-figure revenue - No VC pressure - Real on-chain adoption through ticketing and stablecoin payments That’s why I’m partnering with them - and why I’ll be watching closely.

𝗰𝘆𝗰𝗹𝗼𝗽

75,987 views • 8 months ago

FREE BEEF FOR A YEAR. Yeah… that’s real. But if that’s the only reason you’re here, you’re missing the point. This isn’t about a giveaway. This is about the fact that your food system is being controlled, consolidated, and quietly taken out of American hands. Right now, a handful of corporations dominate beef processing. Foreign ownership exists in major parts of the system. And while that happens… • Ranchers are disappearing • Small towns are collapsing • Real food is being replaced with imported, mislabeled products And almost nobody is talking about it. We are. The American Rancher Alliance is building something that has never existed at this scale before: A transparent, traceable, rancher-owned beef supply chain Going straight back to the American grocery shelf Not direct-to-consumer hype. Not fake labels. Not marketing spin. Real accountability. Real sourcing. Real American beef. But here’s the truth: We are right at the finish line… and this is the moment that decides if we break through or get buried. If you’ve ever said: “I wish I knew where my food came from…” This is it. 👉 Sponsor or donate: 👉 Demand transparency at your store: Print it. Walk it in. Email it. Make noise. Because if consumers don’t demand change… nothing changes. And if we lose control of our food system… we don’t just lose beef. We lose independence. #FoodSystem #FoodTransparency #TakeBackOurFood #AmericanBeef #Ranchers Elon Musk Donald J. Trump Joe Rogan Theo Von

FREE BEEF FOR A YEAR. Yeah… that’s real. But if that’s the only reason you’re here, you’re missing the point. This isn’t about a giveaway. This is about the fact that your food system is being controlled, consolidated, and quietly taken out of American hands. Right now, a handful of corporations dominate beef processing. Foreign ownership exists in major parts of the system. And while that happens… • Ranchers are disappearing • Small towns are collapsing • Real food is being replaced with imported, mislabeled products And almost nobody is talking about it. We are. The American Rancher Alliance is building something that has never existed at this scale before: A transparent, traceable, rancher-owned beef supply chain Going straight back to the American grocery shelf Not direct-to-consumer hype. Not fake labels. Not marketing spin. Real accountability. Real sourcing. Real American beef. But here’s the truth: We are right at the finish line… and this is the moment that decides if we break through or get buried. If you’ve ever said: “I wish I knew where my food came from…” This is it. 👉 Sponsor or donate: 👉 Demand transparency at your store: Print it. Walk it in. Email it. Make noise. Because if consumers don’t demand change… nothing changes. And if we lose control of our food system… we don’t just lose beef. We lose independence. #FoodSystem #FoodTransparency #TakeBackOurFood #AmericanBeef #Ranchers Elon Musk Donald J. Trump Joe Rogan Theo Von

American Rancher Alliance/Hufeisen Ranch

13,479 views • 3 months ago

Feeling stuck watching $XRP move sideways? ZOOM OUT 🚨🚨🚨Watch what’s happening behind the scenes. Fortune 500 corporate customers from Gtreasury moving $10T+ payments are now approaching Ripple, not the other way around That’s how demand starts: quietly, from the top down. Ripple plugged into GTreasury’s payment network 1,000+ enterprises, trillions in flows, zero need to cold-call anyone. Why it matters? Because XRP isn’t chasing retail hype anymore. It’s sitting inside global finance infrastructure Next to liquidity, compliance, and real capital movement. Remember what brad said. " $XRP sits at the center of everything Ripple does " I’ve spent years watching tech chase use cases. This is different. The use case is now chasing the tech. This is how institutional adoption actually begins. Pull > Push. Demand > marketing. Systems > speculation. Miss $XRP here, and you’re not just fading a price. You’re fading a technology that just entered the command center of enterprise finance. Repost if you see it. Follow if you want more alpha like this.

Feeling stuck watching $XRP move sideways? ZOOM OUT 🚨🚨🚨Watch what’s happening behind the scenes. Fortune 500 corporate customers from Gtreasury moving $10T+ payments are now approaching Ripple, not the other way around That’s how demand starts: quietly, from the top down. Ripple plugged into GTreasury’s payment network 1,000+ enterprises, trillions in flows, zero need to cold-call anyone. Why it matters? Because XRP isn’t chasing retail hype anymore. It’s sitting inside global finance infrastructure Next to liquidity, compliance, and real capital movement. Remember what brad said. " $XRP sits at the center of everything Ripple does " I’ve spent years watching tech chase use cases. This is different. The use case is now chasing the tech. This is how institutional adoption actually begins. Pull > Push. Demand > marketing. Systems > speculation. Miss $XRP here, and you’re not just fading a price. You’re fading a technology that just entered the command center of enterprise finance. Repost if you see it. Follow if you want more alpha like this.

X Finance Bull

66,629 views • 8 months ago

Hey guys, welcome back. BTC closed inside of the TBO cloud, up 1.66% on Friday, my third green day in a row, the first close inside since it fell out back on May 26. My macro trend is still bearish since all four TBO lines point down, but I'm expecting Bitcoin to stay bullish through July after catching a bullish OBV cross above the 21SMA on Thursday. I'm watching for this week's candle to close above last week's high at 65,622, which is a tall order, but Bitcoin's RSI at 59.69 tells me there's still room to run before overbought. Ethereum had a fantastic day too, closing up 3.3% and shooting up 14% since Wednesday, with a bullish engulfing candle on the weekly and a bullish RSI reset that I like a lot, targeting around 2,080. Solana dropped another 1.9% and remains in bearish consolidation, which I actually see as healthy given Bitcoin dominance staying bearish, since that's keeping alts strong. My total altcoin cap chart closed inside the cloud with a bullish OBV cross too, which I think marks the start of a regime shift, though I'm still telling anyone on a DCA strategy to keep taking profits since we're in a macro bear market overall. On the TradFi side, I saw a bearish TBO reversal print on Thursday plus a wick into the cloud, so I'm on the fence there, watching the Dixie closely since a break above 102 would be real trouble. The Nikkei and KOSPI both bounced, oil stayed oversold for a tenth straight bar, and gold and silver both printed TBO reversal signs that I'm watching for a tag of the fast line before I'd consider taking profit or flipping short. For my picks, I bought Bitcoin cash on its RSI reset, I'm watching Solana, Farcoin, and Whiff for pullback entries, and I flagged Morpho and Aerodrome as showing early bearish reversal signs worth watching this weekend. CHAPTER MARKERS 00:00 Bitcoin closes inside the TBO cloud 02:46 Ethereum strength and RSI room 04:53 Bitcoin dominance and altcoin breadth 06:53 TradFi setup, Dixie, and USDJPY 09:27 Nikkei, KOSPI, oil, gold, and silver 12:01 Better Traders resources and bot trading 14:17 Kraken, prop trading, Phemex, and AFX 16:20 Bitcoin Cash, Solana, and TBO close shorts 18:30 XRP, SUI, PEPE, VVV, and LAB warnings 20:56 XLM, ALLO, GWEI, FAI, and Fetch 23:21 Micron and MELI pullback setups

Hey guys, welcome back. BTC closed inside of the TBO cloud, up 1.66% on Friday, my third green day in a row, the first close inside since it fell out back on May 26. My macro trend is still bearish since all four TBO lines point down, but I'm expecting Bitcoin to stay bullish through July after catching a bullish OBV cross above the 21SMA on Thursday. I'm watching for this week's candle to close above last week's high at 65,622, which is a tall order, but Bitcoin's RSI at 59.69 tells me there's still room to run before overbought. Ethereum had a fantastic day too, closing up 3.3% and shooting up 14% since Wednesday, with a bullish engulfing candle on the weekly and a bullish RSI reset that I like a lot, targeting around 2,080. Solana dropped another 1.9% and remains in bearish consolidation, which I actually see as healthy given Bitcoin dominance staying bearish, since that's keeping alts strong. My total altcoin cap chart closed inside the cloud with a bullish OBV cross too, which I think marks the start of a regime shift, though I'm still telling anyone on a DCA strategy to keep taking profits since we're in a macro bear market overall. On the TradFi side, I saw a bearish TBO reversal print on Thursday plus a wick into the cloud, so I'm on the fence there, watching the Dixie closely since a break above 102 would be real trouble. The Nikkei and KOSPI both bounced, oil stayed oversold for a tenth straight bar, and gold and silver both printed TBO reversal signs that I'm watching for a tag of the fast line before I'd consider taking profit or flipping short. For my picks, I bought Bitcoin cash on its RSI reset, I'm watching Solana, Farcoin, and Whiff for pullback entries, and I flagged Morpho and Aerodrome as showing early bearish reversal signs worth watching this weekend. CHAPTER MARKERS 00:00 Bitcoin closes inside the TBO cloud 02:46 Ethereum strength and RSI room 04:53 Bitcoin dominance and altcoin breadth 06:53 TradFi setup, Dixie, and USDJPY 09:27 Nikkei, KOSPI, oil, gold, and silver 12:01 Better Traders resources and bot trading 14:17 Kraken, prop trading, Phemex, and AFX 16:20 Bitcoin Cash, Solana, and TBO close shorts 18:30 XRP, SUI, PEPE, VVV, and LAB warnings 20:56 XLM, ALLO, GWEI, FAI, and Fetch 23:21 Micron and MELI pullback setups

Aaron Dishner

11,627 views • 1 month ago

🚨 READ THIS CAREFULLY The S&P 500 is entering the most dangerous part of the pattern. We are currently at point 6. The final all-time high zone. This is the phase where everyone thinks the worst is over. It isn’t. This is where the market turns back. This is a 7 point structure. And so far, it has followed the script perfectly. 1 → First support touch. 2 → First rejection from upper resistance. 3 → Second support touch. 4 → Second rejection. 5 → Panic flush into lower support. 6 → Final all-time high and reversal zone. Now comes 7. That is not the start of the dip. That is already the target zone after the reversal. And this is where the real damage starts. If this structure keeps playing out, the S&P 500 is heading toward 5,200 to 5,300. That is where this pattern completes. We are not there yet. Narratives will break there. Bulls will give up there. And most people will only realize it when the dump is already deep. This is exactly why I keep saying the market is much weaker than it looks. The rally is not strength. It is the final squeeze before the next leg down. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and I called almost every major market top, including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE it hits the headlines.

🚨 READ THIS CAREFULLY The S&P 500 is entering the most dangerous part of the pattern. We are currently at point 6. The final all-time high zone. This is the phase where everyone thinks the worst is over. It isn’t. This is where the market turns back. This is a 7 point structure. And so far, it has followed the script perfectly. 1 → First support touch. 2 → First rejection from upper resistance. 3 → Second support touch. 4 → Second rejection. 5 → Panic flush into lower support. 6 → Final all-time high and reversal zone. Now comes 7. That is not the start of the dip. That is already the target zone after the reversal. And this is where the real damage starts. If this structure keeps playing out, the S&P 500 is heading toward 5,200 to 5,300. That is where this pattern completes. We are not there yet. Narratives will break there. Bulls will give up there. And most people will only realize it when the dump is already deep. This is exactly why I keep saying the market is much weaker than it looks. The rally is not strength. It is the final squeeze before the next leg down. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and I called almost every major market top, including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE it hits the headlines.

Wimar.X

57,995 views • 2 months ago

Michael Owen on RB Leipzig rejecting Real Madrid’s €100 million bid for Yan Diomandé and demanding €130 million. 🗣️ “Rejecting a €100 million offer from Real Madrid for a player who’s only just broken into top-level football is astonishing. I don’t care how talented Yan Diomandé is that kind of valuation has to be earned over years, not after one breakthrough season.” “I like the player. I think he has enormous potential. But potential doesn’t automatically make you a €130 million footballer. Football has started paying for dreams instead of achievements, and that’s becoming a serious problem.” “The moment Real Madrid enter the race, some clubs completely lose perspective. Suddenly every exciting young talent is worth a record-breaking fee. That’s not smart business anymore—that’s simply overpricing the player.” “€100 million is already an incredible statement of belief from Real Madrid. Most young players can only dream of a club valuing them that highly. To reject that and immediately demand another €30 million feels completely disconnected from reality.” “If RB Leipzig genuinely don’t want to sell him, then come out and say he’s not for sale. But asking for €130 million after one outstanding season makes it look like they’re using Real Madrid’s interest to inflate the market beyond reason.” “Real Madrid aren’t buying a Ballon d’Or winner or a player who’s dominated Europe for five or six years. They’re buying a footballer with incredible promise. There is a huge difference, and transfer fees should reflect that.” “This is exactly why the transfer market is becoming harder every year. Clubs complain that fewer elite deals happen, yet they’re the ones putting impossible price tags on players who are still at the very beginning of their careers.” “Leipzig have every right to protect their asset, but rejecting €100 million for a player who has only just announced himself to world football is a huge gamble. If his development slows down or injuries arrive, people will look back and ask whether greed got in the way of common sense.”

Michael Owen on RB Leipzig rejecting Real Madrid’s €100 million bid for Yan Diomandé and demanding €130 million. 🗣️ “Rejecting a €100 million offer from Real Madrid for a player who’s only just broken into top-level football is astonishing. I don’t care how talented Yan Diomandé is that kind of valuation has to be earned over years, not after one breakthrough season.” “I like the player. I think he has enormous potential. But potential doesn’t automatically make you a €130 million footballer. Football has started paying for dreams instead of achievements, and that’s becoming a serious problem.” “The moment Real Madrid enter the race, some clubs completely lose perspective. Suddenly every exciting young talent is worth a record-breaking fee. That’s not smart business anymore—that’s simply overpricing the player.” “€100 million is already an incredible statement of belief from Real Madrid. Most young players can only dream of a club valuing them that highly. To reject that and immediately demand another €30 million feels completely disconnected from reality.” “If RB Leipzig genuinely don’t want to sell him, then come out and say he’s not for sale. But asking for €130 million after one outstanding season makes it look like they’re using Real Madrid’s interest to inflate the market beyond reason.” “Real Madrid aren’t buying a Ballon d’Or winner or a player who’s dominated Europe for five or six years. They’re buying a footballer with incredible promise. There is a huge difference, and transfer fees should reflect that.” “This is exactly why the transfer market is becoming harder every year. Clubs complain that fewer elite deals happen, yet they’re the ones putting impossible price tags on players who are still at the very beginning of their careers.” “Leipzig have every right to protect their asset, but rejecting €100 million for a player who has only just announced himself to world football is a huge gamble. If his development slows down or injuries arrive, people will look back and ask whether greed got in the way of common sense.”

ᜰ

222,800 views • 15 days ago

$ICP technical analysis update - the breakout is playing out EXACTLY as we want. remember when I said we were breaking a 4-year descending wedge at $7.64? we did. now we're at $6.20 with a massive 457K volume spike. wait, but why is the price is DOWN? this is EXACTLY what you want to see. we broke out to ~$10. shorts got liquidated. profit-taking hit. weak hands shook out. this pullback to $6.20 is a RETEST of the breakout level. that volume spike is ABSORPTION. smart money is loading this dip. the best breakouts ALWAYS retest before the real move. the pattern is still intact: descending wedge breakout confirmed ✅ proved we can break above $8-9 ✅ now retesting support at $6-7 ✅ textbook. old resistance becomes new support. we consolidate for a bit and then we run. fibonacci targets unchanged: $16 (0.236 fib) - first stop $24 (0.382 fib) - psychological break $38 (0.618 fib) - acceleration zone $59-93 (full retracement) - primary target when it runs, it runs FAST. $6 to $16 happens in days. $16 to $24 happens even faster. why this pullback is bullish: every major breakout retests. $BTC retests every level. $ETH retested $200 before $4,800. $SOL retested $20 before $260. $ZEC also retested many times. $ICP just retested at $6. this is your entry. fundamentals unchanged: Caffeine Web3 mode Q1 2026 ✅ Swiss incorporation complete ✅ Half of ICP locked ✅ All VC's fully vested ✅ AI market → $5-10 TRILLION ✅ Only blockchain that can host full end-to-end apps on chain ✅ nothing changed except you got a better price. risk/reward right now: risk: retest $5 (19% downside) reward: $16-59 (160-850% upside) 8:1 to 45:1 risk/reward. the chart is screaming: 4-year base complete ✅ wedge breakout confirmed ✅ volume absorption NOW ✅ fib levels mapped ✅ everything aligned. fortunes are made when it's -8% and people are doubting. not when it's +300% and trending. you're either buying this retest at $6. or watching it run to $16-59 without you. this is the trade. DONT FK IT UP ~spec

$ICP technical analysis update - the breakout is playing out EXACTLY as we want. remember when I said we were breaking a 4-year descending wedge at $7.64? we did. now we're at $6.20 with a massive 457K volume spike. wait, but why is the price is DOWN? this is EXACTLY what you want to see. we broke out to ~$10. shorts got liquidated. profit-taking hit. weak hands shook out. this pullback to $6.20 is a RETEST of the breakout level. that volume spike is ABSORPTION. smart money is loading this dip. the best breakouts ALWAYS retest before the real move. the pattern is still intact: descending wedge breakout confirmed ✅ proved we can break above $8-9 ✅ now retesting support at $6-7 ✅ textbook. old resistance becomes new support. we consolidate for a bit and then we run. fibonacci targets unchanged: $16 (0.236 fib) - first stop $24 (0.382 fib) - psychological break $38 (0.618 fib) - acceleration zone $59-93 (full retracement) - primary target when it runs, it runs FAST. $6 to $16 happens in days. $16 to $24 happens even faster. why this pullback is bullish: every major breakout retests. $BTC retests every level. $ETH retested $200 before $4,800. $SOL retested $20 before $260. $ZEC also retested many times. $ICP just retested at $6. this is your entry. fundamentals unchanged: Caffeine Web3 mode Q1 2026 ✅ Swiss incorporation complete ✅ Half of ICP locked ✅ All VC's fully vested ✅ AI market → $5-10 TRILLION ✅ Only blockchain that can host full end-to-end apps on chain ✅ nothing changed except you got a better price. risk/reward right now: risk: retest $5 (19% downside) reward: $16-59 (160-850% upside) 8:1 to 45:1 risk/reward. the chart is screaming: 4-year base complete ✅ wedge breakout confirmed ✅ volume absorption NOW ✅ fib levels mapped ✅ everything aligned. fortunes are made when it's -8% and people are doubting. not when it's +300% and trending. you're either buying this retest at $6. or watching it run to $16-59 without you. this is the trade. DONT FK IT UP ~spec

𝙯𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘

37,902 views • 9 months ago

25 Questions, $3.7 Quadrillion About The Convergence of DTCC, U.S. Treasury, Ripple, RLUSD & XRP 1. What happens when the world’s largest settlement utility - DTCC - moves to tokenized rails? Q Why would the DTCC, which safely moves $3.7 quadrillion a year through legacy rails, suddenly step into blockchain tokenization? A Because the old rails can’t support real-time global liquidity, 24/7 settlement, or tokenized assets. They were built for a slower age. Q And when DTCC modernizes, does the world follow? A Whoever controls the settlement layer of America controls the future of global liquidity. So yes - the world must follow. 2. What kind of blockchain qualifies for DTCC-level settlement? Q Would DTCC ever rely on a chain with probabilistic finality? With MEV extraction? With congestion-based fees? With uncertainty or frequent outages? A Of course not. A quadrillion-dollar system cannot run on chaos. Q Then which systems could support that level of global settlement? A Only ledgers with deterministic finality, predictable fees, regulatory compliance, institutional trust, and native support for asset issuance. This drastically narrows the field. 3. Why did two of the most powerful U.S. financial officials join Ripple? Q Why would Michael Bodson — former CEO of DTCC - join Ripple’s advisory board? A Because he recognizes Ripple’s architecture mirrors the settlement environment he spent a decade modernizing. Q Why would RosIe Rios - former U.S. Treasurer with oversight over the nation’s currency - also join Ripple’s board? A Because she sees where the monetary system is going: Tokenized dollars. Tokenized assets. A neutral, global liquidity asset. A real-time settlement ledger. And Ripple is building exactly that. 4. What does RLUSD being regulated by the NYDFS tell us? Q Why does Ripple choose the most stringent regulatory regime in the country - the NYDFS - for issuing its stablecoin? A Because if you want to operate on America’s financial plumbing, you must build at America’s highest regulatory standard. Q And what does NYDFS require of a stablecoin? A Full dollar backing. Audits. Transparency. No rehypothecation. Operational integrity. Q What ledger fits that requirement without modification? A XRPL - the ledger built for institutional-grade, regulated settlement. 5. Why is RLUSD paired with XRP? Q What is RLUSD? A payment instrument or a liquidity instrument? A It is the cash leg - the digital dollar. Q But can a dollar, even a tokenized one, bridge FX markets, settle cross-jurisdictional flows, or provide global liquidity? A No. That requires a neutral bridge asset. Q So if RLUSD is the cash leg, what is the liquidity leg? A XRP - by design, by architecture, by function. 6. What ledger is built for institutional settlement? Q Why was XRPL built with deterministic finality instead of probabilistic settlement? A Because real-time finance cannot settle on uncertainty. Q Why does XRPL have no MEV? No gas auctions? Predictable fees? A Because institutional liquidity cannot be subject to market manipulation or extraction. Q Why does the XRPL support issued assets (IOUs) natively? Tokenization? Atomic settlement? A Because its purpose is to be the global clearing and liquidity layer for digital finance. 7. Why is ISO 20022 important here? Q Does global finance run on random messaging formats? A No. It runs on standardization - ISO 20022. Q Which blockchain ecosystem was designed from inception to align with ISO 20022 semantics? A Ripple’s network and XRPL. Q Why does this matter? Because tokenized finance requires a standardized global language for value. 8. Why Rosie Rios and America 250 matter? Q Why would the Chair of America 250, a Congressionally chartered commission defining America’s future story, be tied to Ripple? A Because America’s 250th anniversary is not merely symbolic — it is a narrative reset for national identity, sovereignty, competitiveness, and economic renewal.

25 Questions, $3.7 Quadrillion About The Convergence of DTCC, U.S. Treasury, Ripple, RLUSD & XRP 1. What happens when the world’s largest settlement utility - DTCC - moves to tokenized rails? Q Why would the DTCC, which safely moves $3.7 quadrillion a year through legacy rails, suddenly step into blockchain tokenization? A Because the old rails can’t support real-time global liquidity, 24/7 settlement, or tokenized assets. They were built for a slower age. Q And when DTCC modernizes, does the world follow? A Whoever controls the settlement layer of America controls the future of global liquidity. So yes - the world must follow. 2. What kind of blockchain qualifies for DTCC-level settlement? Q Would DTCC ever rely on a chain with probabilistic finality? With MEV extraction? With congestion-based fees? With uncertainty or frequent outages? A Of course not. A quadrillion-dollar system cannot run on chaos. Q Then which systems could support that level of global settlement? A Only ledgers with deterministic finality, predictable fees, regulatory compliance, institutional trust, and native support for asset issuance. This drastically narrows the field. 3. Why did two of the most powerful U.S. financial officials join Ripple? Q Why would Michael Bodson — former CEO of DTCC - join Ripple’s advisory board? A Because he recognizes Ripple’s architecture mirrors the settlement environment he spent a decade modernizing. Q Why would RosIe Rios - former U.S. Treasurer with oversight over the nation’s currency - also join Ripple’s board? A Because she sees where the monetary system is going: Tokenized dollars. Tokenized assets. A neutral, global liquidity asset. A real-time settlement ledger. And Ripple is building exactly that. 4. What does RLUSD being regulated by the NYDFS tell us? Q Why does Ripple choose the most stringent regulatory regime in the country - the NYDFS - for issuing its stablecoin? A Because if you want to operate on America’s financial plumbing, you must build at America’s highest regulatory standard. Q And what does NYDFS require of a stablecoin? A Full dollar backing. Audits. Transparency. No rehypothecation. Operational integrity. Q What ledger fits that requirement without modification? A XRPL - the ledger built for institutional-grade, regulated settlement. 5. Why is RLUSD paired with XRP? Q What is RLUSD? A payment instrument or a liquidity instrument? A It is the cash leg - the digital dollar. Q But can a dollar, even a tokenized one, bridge FX markets, settle cross-jurisdictional flows, or provide global liquidity? A No. That requires a neutral bridge asset. Q So if RLUSD is the cash leg, what is the liquidity leg? A XRP - by design, by architecture, by function. 6. What ledger is built for institutional settlement? Q Why was XRPL built with deterministic finality instead of probabilistic settlement? A Because real-time finance cannot settle on uncertainty. Q Why does XRPL have no MEV? No gas auctions? Predictable fees? A Because institutional liquidity cannot be subject to market manipulation or extraction. Q Why does the XRPL support issued assets (IOUs) natively? Tokenization? Atomic settlement? A Because its purpose is to be the global clearing and liquidity layer for digital finance. 7. Why is ISO 20022 important here? Q Does global finance run on random messaging formats? A No. It runs on standardization - ISO 20022. Q Which blockchain ecosystem was designed from inception to align with ISO 20022 semantics? A Ripple’s network and XRPL. Q Why does this matter? Because tokenized finance requires a standardized global language for value. 8. Why Rosie Rios and America 250 matter? Q Why would the Chair of America 250, a Congressionally chartered commission defining America’s future story, be tied to Ripple? A Because America’s 250th anniversary is not merely symbolic — it is a narrative reset for national identity, sovereignty, competitiveness, and economic renewal.

Rob Cunningham

152,835 views • 8 months ago

Everyone keeps acting like this move came out of nowhere but we called every inch of it in real time. We said a counter trend rally was coming. We got it. We said the lower high would form. It did. I said I was coming after $NVDA at the open. We took the short the second the bell rang. And we scaled out into the lows exactly where the signals told us to. Same thing with the #SP500. Same thing with #Tesla. Every entry. Every scale out. Every warning. All posted live before the move ever happened. Nothing about this was luck. It was structure. It was trend. It was the signal line and the SuperTrend doing exactly what they’ve done all year. Guide us through the noise while everyone else chases candles. Now here’s where we stand right now. I’m officially expecting upside from here. Not strength. A reset. A counter trend release inside a larger downtrend that hasn’t changed at all. For $TSLA, I’m watching $424–$430. For the #SP500, I’m watching $672. For $NVDA, I’m watching $188–$193. Those are the levels where I’ll start loading size again. That’s where I’ll replace what we scaled out at the lows. The weekly structure hasn’t flipped. The monthly hasn’t flipped. The SuperTrend is still red across the board. The larger move is still in front of us. We caught the bounce. We caught the flush. We took profits on every leg. And now we wait for the next opportunity. The same way we always do. Signal by signal and level by level. Watch the video. I break down every chart, every signal and every target.

Everyone keeps acting like this move came out of nowhere but we called every inch of it in real time. We said a counter trend rally was coming. We got it. We said the lower high would form. It did. I said I was coming after $NVDA at the open. We took the short the second the bell rang. And we scaled out into the lows exactly where the signals told us to. Same thing with the #SP500. Same thing with #Tesla. Every entry. Every scale out. Every warning. All posted live before the move ever happened. Nothing about this was luck. It was structure. It was trend. It was the signal line and the SuperTrend doing exactly what they’ve done all year. Guide us through the noise while everyone else chases candles. Now here’s where we stand right now. I’m officially expecting upside from here. Not strength. A reset. A counter trend release inside a larger downtrend that hasn’t changed at all. For $TSLA, I’m watching $424–$430. For the #SP500, I’m watching $672. For $NVDA, I’m watching $188–$193. Those are the levels where I’ll start loading size again. That’s where I’ll replace what we scaled out at the lows. The weekly structure hasn’t flipped. The monthly hasn’t flipped. The SuperTrend is still red across the board. The larger move is still in front of us. We caught the bounce. We caught the flush. We took profits on every leg. And now we wait for the next opportunity. The same way we always do. Signal by signal and level by level. Watch the video. I break down every chart, every signal and every target.

TraderJonesy

99,031 views • 8 months ago

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉

Lunix

15,396 views • 10 months ago

NIFTY50 🚨 Repost for reach!🙏 Watch the video completely to see the perspective from 2027. In today’s video, I took a deep look at Nifty 50 through the lens of higher timeframes — the 3M, 6M, and 12M charts. Each candle here represents significant time, so the signals are powerful and less noisy. My main thesis is clear: We are setting up for a Triple Top formation on the 3M chart, followed by a violent downward ride. Let me walk you through what I’m seeing step by step. 3M Chart View On the 3-month chart, we’ve already seen a green candle. The RSI, which had fallen sharply, is now trying to pull itself back up. But don’t get too excited yet — this is a higher timeframe, so moves are smoother and slower. I’m expecting the index to form green candles ahead, but they won’t be those massive bullish ones we saw during the strong momentum phase. Instead, we’ll likely trade in a strict range, building toward a Triple Top near or slightly above the last all-time high. The price may try to push to that previous peak (or even create a small spillover) to confuse the market. However, if the RSI shows a hidden bearish divergence and forms a lower high, it will be a strong warning. RSI denial at those levels should trigger the real downside move. This is not about bending or curving randomly — it’s a structured formation I’m watching closely from pure price action and RSI. 6M Chart View On the six-month chart, we’ve already formed a top, and the RSI is sitting comfortably in the momentum zone. The upside action I’m anticipating should mostly play out within the next one year. We might see the next candle body complete somewhere around the 25,612 – 25,692 zone. I’m looking at a four-candle base here. It generally doesn’t form a clean double top without curves — we’ve already seen one curve, and I expect another. There could be some spillover beyond the all-time high, but it won’t sustain. Everything points to major developments unfolding within 2027 itself. If we make a higher high in this structure, it will definitely influence how I manage my portfolio (more on that in future videos). 12M Chart View The 12-month chart is always trickier because each candle covers a full year. We may see a retrace over the next six months, forming a small top. After that, there’s potential for a move toward the red zone (downside territory). If the bigger moves play out within 2026 itself, the next 12M candle could turn out to be super strong. But for now, I’m leaning more on the clearer signals coming from the 3M and 6M charts.

NIFTY50 🚨 Repost for reach!🙏 Watch the video completely to see the perspective from 2027. In today’s video, I took a deep look at Nifty 50 through the lens of higher timeframes — the 3M, 6M, and 12M charts. Each candle here represents significant time, so the signals are powerful and less noisy. My main thesis is clear: We are setting up for a Triple Top formation on the 3M chart, followed by a violent downward ride. Let me walk you through what I’m seeing step by step. 3M Chart View On the 3-month chart, we’ve already seen a green candle. The RSI, which had fallen sharply, is now trying to pull itself back up. But don’t get too excited yet — this is a higher timeframe, so moves are smoother and slower. I’m expecting the index to form green candles ahead, but they won’t be those massive bullish ones we saw during the strong momentum phase. Instead, we’ll likely trade in a strict range, building toward a Triple Top near or slightly above the last all-time high. The price may try to push to that previous peak (or even create a small spillover) to confuse the market. However, if the RSI shows a hidden bearish divergence and forms a lower high, it will be a strong warning. RSI denial at those levels should trigger the real downside move. This is not about bending or curving randomly — it’s a structured formation I’m watching closely from pure price action and RSI. 6M Chart View On the six-month chart, we’ve already formed a top, and the RSI is sitting comfortably in the momentum zone. The upside action I’m anticipating should mostly play out within the next one year. We might see the next candle body complete somewhere around the 25,612 – 25,692 zone. I’m looking at a four-candle base here. It generally doesn’t form a clean double top without curves — we’ve already seen one curve, and I expect another. There could be some spillover beyond the all-time high, but it won’t sustain. Everything points to major developments unfolding within 2027 itself. If we make a higher high in this structure, it will definitely influence how I manage my portfolio (more on that in future videos). 12M Chart View The 12-month chart is always trickier because each candle covers a full year. We may see a retrace over the next six months, forming a small top. After that, there’s potential for a move toward the red zone (downside territory). If the bigger moves play out within 2026 itself, the next 12M candle could turn out to be super strong. But for now, I’m leaning more on the clearer signals coming from the 3M and 6M charts.

Cryptified Soul (Garima)

10,879 views • 1 month ago

IT ALL HAPPENED IN 2020: NICE TRY, GASEYEON!🫵🥊 The current video that Gaseyeon is using to claim that Kim Soohyun was at Kim Saeron's family home and was the one filming her was actually taken in 2020. Kim Saeron moved into her house that same year and even showcased it on the show On and Off on September 6, 2020. During the show, she proudly mentioned that she was 21 years old (age in Korean). Additionally, if you listen to the background audio in the video, they are watching the Knowing Bros episode from April 4, 2020. Another lie from her family and Gaseyeon is their accusation of minor dating, claiming that Saeron was underage. However, Goldmedalist confirmed that Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron’s relationship took place from mid-2019 to late 2020—when both were legally adults. This is clear proof that no minor dating was involved. Gaseyeon, you can't fool us! And oh, by the way—Kim Saeron was living a luxurious life in 2020. That’s another hot topic. If she was doing so well back then, how did she suddenly go broke? Her parents claimed she was financially struggling before she "disappeared." Now, that’s the real mystery! © On and Off interview 🔗 Source & For the 🎥 Knowing Bros JTBC #KimSoohyun #WeStandWithKimSoohyun #김수현

IT ALL HAPPENED IN 2020: NICE TRY, GASEYEON!🫵🥊 The current video that Gaseyeon is using to claim that Kim Soohyun was at Kim Saeron's family home and was the one filming her was actually taken in 2020. Kim Saeron moved into her house that same year and even showcased it on the show On and Off on September 6, 2020. During the show, she proudly mentioned that she was 21 years old (age in Korean). Additionally, if you listen to the background audio in the video, they are watching the Knowing Bros episode from April 4, 2020. Another lie from her family and Gaseyeon is their accusation of minor dating, claiming that Saeron was underage. However, Goldmedalist confirmed that Kim Soohyun and Kim Saeron’s relationship took place from mid-2019 to late 2020—when both were legally adults. This is clear proof that no minor dating was involved. Gaseyeon, you can't fool us! And oh, by the way—Kim Saeron was living a luxurious life in 2020. That’s another hot topic. If she was doing so well back then, how did she suddenly go broke? Her parents claimed she was financially struggling before she "disappeared." Now, that’s the real mystery! © On and Off interview 🔗 Source & For the 🎥 Knowing Bros JTBC #KimSoohyun #WeStandWithKimSoohyun #김수현

KimSooHyunShi 김수현 Philippines 🇵🇭 FC

367,765 views • 1 year ago

Some weeks ago when the $CFI claim went live, I had a decision to make. I could’ve claimed and moved on. Instead, I staked my entire allocation. Right now, that locked allocation is already earning around 9% APR quietly in the background. So far, it’s added 621.96 CFI without me touching anything, And in about 158 days, my boost allocation will also be unlocks on top of that. That alone already tells me I made the right call. But here’s the bigger reason I’m still holding everything. ConsumerFi Protocol isn’t just a token to me. It’s the execution layer behind real apps that people are already using especially the Kinsu. The Kinsu Genesis Vault is a perfect example of what ConsumerFi is trying to do right. You deposit USDC. You lock xCFI. And you unlock boosted yield on your savings. No leverage. No weird loops. No manual rebalancing. ConsumerFi even allocated 2.5 million $CFI specifically to power boosted yields in this vault. What I like most is how the yield stacks: - Base USDC yield from blue-chip lending markets - Staking yield from xCFI - Boost emissions when you lock xCFI And on top of that, your xCFI balance feeds directly into Season 2 points, with boosts that scale the more aligned you are. This is exactly why I’m holding my full allocation. ConsumerFi rewards patience, alignment, and actual usage, not quick exits. If you believe consumer crypto should just work in the background while value compounds, this setup makes a lot of sense. I’m staying locked. I’m staying boosted. And I’m letting execution do its thing. If you’re already in, take a real look at how you’re positioned. If you’re not, this is the kind of system that rewards showing up early and staying aligned. ConsumerFi is still early, and i'm here. That’s the difference.

Some weeks ago when the $CFI claim went live, I had a decision to make. I could’ve claimed and moved on. Instead, I staked my entire allocation. Right now, that locked allocation is already earning around 9% APR quietly in the background. So far, it’s added 621.96 CFI without me touching anything, And in about 158 days, my boost allocation will also be unlocks on top of that. That alone already tells me I made the right call. But here’s the bigger reason I’m still holding everything. ConsumerFi Protocol isn’t just a token to me. It’s the execution layer behind real apps that people are already using especially the Kinsu. The Kinsu Genesis Vault is a perfect example of what ConsumerFi is trying to do right. You deposit USDC. You lock xCFI. And you unlock boosted yield on your savings. No leverage. No weird loops. No manual rebalancing. ConsumerFi even allocated 2.5 million $CFI specifically to power boosted yields in this vault. What I like most is how the yield stacks: - Base USDC yield from blue-chip lending markets - Staking yield from xCFI - Boost emissions when you lock xCFI And on top of that, your xCFI balance feeds directly into Season 2 points, with boosts that scale the more aligned you are. This is exactly why I’m holding my full allocation. ConsumerFi rewards patience, alignment, and actual usage, not quick exits. If you believe consumer crypto should just work in the background while value compounds, this setup makes a lot of sense. I’m staying locked. I’m staying boosted. And I’m letting execution do its thing. If you’re already in, take a real look at how you’re positioned. If you’re not, this is the kind of system that rewards showing up early and staying aligned. ConsumerFi is still early, and i'm here. That’s the difference.

🌱Smartcoded.fogo ($/acc) ⋈

11,241 views • 7 months ago

I just built an AI agent that’s 10x smarter than anything using basic search APIs. Here’s what nobody’s telling you about AI development right now. Most developers are stuck using limited search APIs. They’re missing social media data, forums, live news, and answer engines. Their AI is effectively blind to 90% of the public web. The result: Stale data. Weak responses. And endless engineering overhead just to stitch everything together. What changed everything for me was Bright Data’s Web Discovery platform. Instead of juggling multiple APIs and unreliable sources, I got real-time access to every public data source through one unified API. Google. Bing. Twitter. Reddit. Instagram. TikTok. ChatGPT. Perplexity. Even historical web archives going back years. Here’s why this actually matters in practice: • One API instead of 10+ fragmented integrations • Real-time, constantly refreshed public web data • Coverage across search engines, social platforms, forums, and answer engines • Consistent data structure that just works • Way less time fighting data plumbing, way more time building intelligence I used it to build a real-time pricing monitor that tracks competitor pricing, social sentiment, and trending topics at the same time. Something that would’ve taken weeks of integration work happened in a single afternoon. The real breakthrough isn’t just access. It’s consistency. Reliability. And freedom. If you’re building search agents, RAG pipelines, or any AI-driven product, you’re handicapping yourself without comprehensive web data. Check the link in the comments to try it yourself. They’re offering trial credits, and the documentation is actually solid. This is the difference between AI products that work and AI products that dominate. Check it out here:

I just built an AI agent that’s 10x smarter than anything using basic search APIs. Here’s what nobody’s telling you about AI development right now. Most developers are stuck using limited search APIs. They’re missing social media data, forums, live news, and answer engines. Their AI is effectively blind to 90% of the public web. The result: Stale data. Weak responses. And endless engineering overhead just to stitch everything together. What changed everything for me was Bright Data’s Web Discovery platform. Instead of juggling multiple APIs and unreliable sources, I got real-time access to every public data source through one unified API. Google. Bing. Twitter. Reddit. Instagram. TikTok. ChatGPT. Perplexity. Even historical web archives going back years. Here’s why this actually matters in practice: • One API instead of 10+ fragmented integrations • Real-time, constantly refreshed public web data • Coverage across search engines, social platforms, forums, and answer engines • Consistent data structure that just works • Way less time fighting data plumbing, way more time building intelligence I used it to build a real-time pricing monitor that tracks competitor pricing, social sentiment, and trending topics at the same time. Something that would’ve taken weeks of integration work happened in a single afternoon. The real breakthrough isn’t just access. It’s consistency. Reliability. And freedom. If you’re building search agents, RAG pipelines, or any AI-driven product, you’re handicapping yourself without comprehensive web data. Check the link in the comments to try it yourself. They’re offering trial credits, and the documentation is actually solid. This is the difference between AI products that work and AI products that dominate. Check it out here:

Hasan Toor

100,511 views • 6 months ago

If insurance companies don’t adapt to Tesla FSD, they’re going to have a real problem. In 2024 at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting, Warren Buffett got asked, “Assuming Elon delivers on his fully autonomous driving goal. Elon said, if you’ve got at scale, a statistically significant amount of data that shows conclusively that the autonomous car has half the accident rate of a human driven car, I think that’s difficult to ignore. Assuming Elon succeeds in reducing accidents by 50% vs human drivers, wouldn’t auto insurance rates fall to reflect the reduced underwriting risks, thereby adversely impacting Geico’s revenues and float and perhaps margins, too?” His main response was, “Well, let’s just take the extreme example. Let’s say there are only going to be 3 accidents in the U.S. next year for some crazy reason… anything that reduces accidents is going to reduce costs… If accidents get reduced 50%, it’s going to be good for society and it’s going to be bad for insurance companies’ volume… but good for society is what we’re looking for.” I’ve followed Tesla closely for years and now the proof is impossible to ignore. Profiting from insurance is built on risk and FSD is systematically removing it. FSD has now crossed the data threshold that insurers can’t ignore. By 2026, Tesla FSD has logged over 10B+ real world miles from real human behavior, real streets, real weather, real chaos, and it’s materially more data than ANY company in the world has today. Tesla’s own safety reports show it clearly: • Human driven U.S. average: ~1M miles per accident • Tesla Autopilot: ~4.5M miles per accident • Tesla FSD engaged: ~7.5M miles per accident That’s a 7.5x safety improvement over human driving! If the risk is 7.5x lower, and your premiums you’re charging customers don’t change, something is wrong. Insurance pricing is supposed to reflect this risk. This is why today’s Lemonade announcement is a wake up call to insurance providers. When Lemonade announced it’s offering a 50% insurance discount when FSD is steering, they’re reacting to Tesla FSD data. Fewer crashes results in fewer payouts, period. This is what adaptive insurance looks like and thus why Tesla & Lemonade insurance has an advantage. They are adapting to real FSD data and real time risk, and adjusting the prices. All while traditional insurance companies are still using broad historical averages, falling behind and losing customers. Companies like GEICO, State Farm, and Allstate were built for a world where humans are driving, risk is random, and prices update slowly. I believe this era of insurance is ending. Even Warren admitted it in this video, saying cutting accidents in half is great for society, but BAD for insurance volume. Bc less risk means lower premiums and lower premiums mean less float and less float is the core of traditional insurance profits! If FSD adoption hits even 50% of Tesla’s fleet, I bet accident rates could drop 30-50% industry wide. That alone puts massive pressure on a ~$300B U.S. auto insurance market today. This is also why I believe Tesla insurance has a MAJOR advantage. Your premium is solely based on data. It uses real time vehicle telemetry, scores you based on actual driving behavior, and rewards your FSD usage directly and right away. In places like California, Tesla Insurance premiums for FSD users are already 20-30% cheaper than competitors. In some cases, safe drivers see up to 60% discounts. And in Texas, claims for FSD users are 40% lower than non-FSD drivers. The long term outcome is becoming obvious to me. Insurance companies that DO NOT adapt prices dynamically, use real time data, and recognize FSD’s safety advantage will most likely lose their best customers to companies that do. For Tesla owners, this is great news bc safer driving, esp using FSD will result in cheaper insurance, but for legacy insurers, this is an existential moment. You either adapt or risk getting left behind.

If insurance companies don’t adapt to Tesla FSD, they’re going to have a real problem. In 2024 at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting, Warren Buffett got asked, “Assuming Elon delivers on his fully autonomous driving goal. Elon said, if you’ve got at scale, a statistically significant amount of data that shows conclusively that the autonomous car has half the accident rate of a human driven car, I think that’s difficult to ignore. Assuming Elon succeeds in reducing accidents by 50% vs human drivers, wouldn’t auto insurance rates fall to reflect the reduced underwriting risks, thereby adversely impacting Geico’s revenues and float and perhaps margins, too?” His main response was, “Well, let’s just take the extreme example. Let’s say there are only going to be 3 accidents in the U.S. next year for some crazy reason… anything that reduces accidents is going to reduce costs… If accidents get reduced 50%, it’s going to be good for society and it’s going to be bad for insurance companies’ volume… but good for society is what we’re looking for.” I’ve followed Tesla closely for years and now the proof is impossible to ignore. Profiting from insurance is built on risk and FSD is systematically removing it. FSD has now crossed the data threshold that insurers can’t ignore. By 2026, Tesla FSD has logged over 10B+ real world miles from real human behavior, real streets, real weather, real chaos, and it’s materially more data than ANY company in the world has today. Tesla’s own safety reports show it clearly: • Human driven U.S. average: ~1M miles per accident • Tesla Autopilot: ~4.5M miles per accident • Tesla FSD engaged: ~7.5M miles per accident That’s a 7.5x safety improvement over human driving! If the risk is 7.5x lower, and your premiums you’re charging customers don’t change, something is wrong. Insurance pricing is supposed to reflect this risk. This is why today’s Lemonade announcement is a wake up call to insurance providers. When Lemonade announced it’s offering a 50% insurance discount when FSD is steering, they’re reacting to Tesla FSD data. Fewer crashes results in fewer payouts, period. This is what adaptive insurance looks like and thus why Tesla & Lemonade insurance has an advantage. They are adapting to real FSD data and real time risk, and adjusting the prices. All while traditional insurance companies are still using broad historical averages, falling behind and losing customers. Companies like GEICO, State Farm, and Allstate were built for a world where humans are driving, risk is random, and prices update slowly. I believe this era of insurance is ending. Even Warren admitted it in this video, saying cutting accidents in half is great for society, but BAD for insurance volume. Bc less risk means lower premiums and lower premiums mean less float and less float is the core of traditional insurance profits! If FSD adoption hits even 50% of Tesla’s fleet, I bet accident rates could drop 30-50% industry wide. That alone puts massive pressure on a ~$300B U.S. auto insurance market today. This is also why I believe Tesla insurance has a MAJOR advantage. Your premium is solely based on data. It uses real time vehicle telemetry, scores you based on actual driving behavior, and rewards your FSD usage directly and right away. In places like California, Tesla Insurance premiums for FSD users are already 20-30% cheaper than competitors. In some cases, safe drivers see up to 60% discounts. And in Texas, claims for FSD users are 40% lower than non-FSD drivers. The long term outcome is becoming obvious to me. Insurance companies that DO NOT adapt prices dynamically, use real time data, and recognize FSD’s safety advantage will most likely lose their best customers to companies that do. For Tesla owners, this is great news bc safer driving, esp using FSD will result in cheaper insurance, but for legacy insurers, this is an existential moment. You either adapt or risk getting left behind.

Teslaconomics

140,963 views • 6 months ago

This girl built a $24/year AI visual setup while most creators are still overpaying $1,800 to $4,080 a year for APIs, cloud rendering and visual tools. And no, this isn’t a pre-render or a paid filter hiding in the cloud. It’s live on her laptop right now. The phone camera feeds into TouchDesigner, the movement gets turned into particles, and the whole visual reacts in real time. Most people build this the expensive way. $50 to $180/month in API usage, $40 to $100/month for cloud rendering, another $60/month for visual software, then a “small” creative workflow quietly turns into a $3,000+/year habit. Her stack cuts through almost all of that. The phone becomes the input. TouchDesigner handles the visual layer. Ollama runs the local model. The laptop does the loop without sending every experiment to someone else’s server. No cloud GPU. No API meter. No subscription chain. No project that dies when the billing page fails. Just a normal machine, a camera feed, a node graph and a local model running visuals people still assume need a paid stack behind them. The numbers are the insane part. $0 for Ollama. $0 for TouchDesigner non-commercial. 8GB+ RAM is enough to start. Around $2/month if you count electricity. That’s $24/year instead of a stack that can hit $4,080/year. The effect looks like something a studio would sell. The setup is just one girl refusing to rent the whole process every month.

This girl built a $24/year AI visual setup while most creators are still overpaying $1,800 to $4,080 a year for APIs, cloud rendering and visual tools. And no, this isn’t a pre-render or a paid filter hiding in the cloud. It’s live on her laptop right now. The phone camera feeds into TouchDesigner, the movement gets turned into particles, and the whole visual reacts in real time. Most people build this the expensive way. $50 to $180/month in API usage, $40 to $100/month for cloud rendering, another $60/month for visual software, then a “small” creative workflow quietly turns into a $3,000+/year habit. Her stack cuts through almost all of that. The phone becomes the input. TouchDesigner handles the visual layer. Ollama runs the local model. The laptop does the loop without sending every experiment to someone else’s server. No cloud GPU. No API meter. No subscription chain. No project that dies when the billing page fails. Just a normal machine, a camera feed, a node graph and a local model running visuals people still assume need a paid stack behind them. The numbers are the insane part. $0 for Ollama. $0 for TouchDesigner non-commercial. 8GB+ RAM is enough to start. Around $2/month if you count electricity. That’s $24/year instead of a stack that can hit $4,080/year. The effect looks like something a studio would sell. The setup is just one girl refusing to rent the whole process every month.

Gipp 🦅

24,423 views • 2 months ago

For the past few weeks I’ve been teaching 50+ kids how to create their own games with AI. The results have been incredible 🤯 I started with my 5 y/o nephew because I was worried about him spending hours doomscrolling and consuming brainrot content. He built his first game using v0, though I had to walk him through each step. Watching kids interact with these tools taught me so much about how they think, where they get stuck, and what keeps them motivated. The moment that really struck me came right after he finished that first game. Every time I saw him afterward, he’d run up and ask, “Did you bring your laptop so I can keep playing?”. For him, “playing” meant creating. That kind of excitement is organic pull. Don’t get me wrong, I love v0 and Lovable. They’re insanely powerful. Their UIs just aren’t designed for kids, and that’s totally fine. Kids still need guidance, structure, and a bit of tutoring to turn ideas into something playable. I’m seeing tech leaders push in this direction too, and I think there’s a real opportunity here (Matias Woloski Thomas Wolf). Kids are the future, and I don’t want to live in a world where they spend precious time consuming instead of creating. That’s why I love tools like v0, Lovable, wabi , Cursor . They’re empowering more people to become creators. I want that same feeling for kids. What Guillermo is saying is real. Kids need to be AI-literate from the outset. It honestly makes me sad to think about my nephew growing up and falling behind on AI and everything happening around him because he’s stuck in Roblox or TikTok. That’s why I built Rabbit 🐰 for him. It started as a simple prototype, but somehow I ended up talking with 200+ parents and kids, tech leaders, investors, and people I never imagined meeting around the world. Rabbit now has 100+ people on the waitlist, and 10 kids are using it two to three times per week on average to create their own games 🫡 I’m not sure yet if this will become my full-time project, but I deeply care about it. If you’re building in this space, I’d love to connect and share ideas. And if you’re a parent interested in Rabbit, I’d love your feedback. Sharing a short video of kids using Rabbit below:

For the past few weeks I’ve been teaching 50+ kids how to create their own games with AI. The results have been incredible 🤯 I started with my 5 y/o nephew because I was worried about him spending hours doomscrolling and consuming brainrot content. He built his first game using v0, though I had to walk him through each step. Watching kids interact with these tools taught me so much about how they think, where they get stuck, and what keeps them motivated. The moment that really struck me came right after he finished that first game. Every time I saw him afterward, he’d run up and ask, “Did you bring your laptop so I can keep playing?”. For him, “playing” meant creating. That kind of excitement is organic pull. Don’t get me wrong, I love v0 and Lovable. They’re insanely powerful. Their UIs just aren’t designed for kids, and that’s totally fine. Kids still need guidance, structure, and a bit of tutoring to turn ideas into something playable. I’m seeing tech leaders push in this direction too, and I think there’s a real opportunity here (Matias Woloski Thomas Wolf). Kids are the future, and I don’t want to live in a world where they spend precious time consuming instead of creating. That’s why I love tools like v0, Lovable, wabi , Cursor . They’re empowering more people to become creators. I want that same feeling for kids. What Guillermo is saying is real. Kids need to be AI-literate from the outset. It honestly makes me sad to think about my nephew growing up and falling behind on AI and everything happening around him because he’s stuck in Roblox or TikTok. That’s why I built Rabbit 🐰 for him. It started as a simple prototype, but somehow I ended up talking with 200+ parents and kids, tech leaders, investors, and people I never imagined meeting around the world. Rabbit now has 100+ people on the waitlist, and 10 kids are using it two to three times per week on average to create their own games 🫡 I’m not sure yet if this will become my full-time project, but I deeply care about it. If you’re building in this space, I’d love to connect and share ideas. And if you’re a parent interested in Rabbit, I’d love your feedback. Sharing a short video of kids using Rabbit below:

Fausto

44,125 views • 7 months ago

Breaking news: the cameras moved on… and so did Harry and Meghan. Harry and Meghan rolled out their shiny new “Parents Network” with all the usual ingredients: big emotions, big headlines, and bigger moral posturing about protecting mums and dads who’ve lost children to online harm. And now? The whole thing has been handed over to ParentsTogether, which has taken full operational responsibility and their page doesn’t even mention Harry and Meghan at all. Not credited. Not referenced. Not even a polite footnote. Just… gone. Let’s call it exactly what it looks like, because the pattern is getting embarrassingly predictable. If they were genuinely building something meaningful, there would be transparency. Named founders. Clear ownership. Public accountability. Visible involvement beyond the announcement stage. Instead, we’re watching the same tired routine again: attach their names to vulnerable people for maximum sympathy and visibility, then quietly fade out once the real work begins and someone competent has to do the heavy lifting. That isn’t leadership. That isn’t service. That’s branding. They don’t build stable organisations that stand on their own. They build launch moments. They build photo ops. They build emotional campaigns designed to make them look compassionate while other people’s grief does the work. Because if ParentsTogether is running it fully and their names are missing entirely, it tells you everything you need to know. This was never about long term commitment. It was about the glow of being seen as “saviours” and then slipping out the back door the moment the cameras move on. Real advocacy doesn’t vanish the second an initiative becomes operational. Real commitment doesn’t need another organisation to come in and quietly fix the structure and execution. And real compassion doesn’t treat grieving parents like props in a reputation rebuild. So no, this doesn’t read as “handing over” something they built. It reads like a tragedy was used for attention, then the responsibility was dumped on people who actually know what they’re doing. Same stunt. New victims. Who’s next on the PR conveyor belt?

Breaking news: the cameras moved on… and so did Harry and Meghan. Harry and Meghan rolled out their shiny new “Parents Network” with all the usual ingredients: big emotions, big headlines, and bigger moral posturing about protecting mums and dads who’ve lost children to online harm. And now? The whole thing has been handed over to ParentsTogether, which has taken full operational responsibility and their page doesn’t even mention Harry and Meghan at all. Not credited. Not referenced. Not even a polite footnote. Just… gone. Let’s call it exactly what it looks like, because the pattern is getting embarrassingly predictable. If they were genuinely building something meaningful, there would be transparency. Named founders. Clear ownership. Public accountability. Visible involvement beyond the announcement stage. Instead, we’re watching the same tired routine again: attach their names to vulnerable people for maximum sympathy and visibility, then quietly fade out once the real work begins and someone competent has to do the heavy lifting. That isn’t leadership. That isn’t service. That’s branding. They don’t build stable organisations that stand on their own. They build launch moments. They build photo ops. They build emotional campaigns designed to make them look compassionate while other people’s grief does the work. Because if ParentsTogether is running it fully and their names are missing entirely, it tells you everything you need to know. This was never about long term commitment. It was about the glow of being seen as “saviours” and then slipping out the back door the moment the cameras move on. Real advocacy doesn’t vanish the second an initiative becomes operational. Real commitment doesn’t need another organisation to come in and quietly fix the structure and execution. And real compassion doesn’t treat grieving parents like props in a reputation rebuild. So no, this doesn’t read as “handing over” something they built. It reads like a tragedy was used for attention, then the responsibility was dumped on people who actually know what they’re doing. Same stunt. New victims. Who’s next on the PR conveyor belt?

Queen Esther

174,034 views • 6 months ago

🌍Step by Step, We Are Defining Our Path To all GCV Ambassadors, community leaders, merchants, and dedicated pioneers—this message is for you. Recently, some pioneers asked: “Why hasn’t Pi Network become a stablecoin?” This question is even more relevant now that the U.S. Senate passed the Genius Bill, and President Trump has signed it into law. Yes, this marks progress in cryptocurrency regulation. But let’s be clear: stablecoins still belong to the fiat world. They are simply digital reflections of old money systems—backed by USD or U.S. Treasury bonds. They are “crypto” married to Fiat. Nothing revolutionary. Nothing decentralized. From Genius Bill, I think algorithmic stablecoins have been rejected, learning hard lessons from the Luna and UST collapse because no market confidence. Pi Network is Not a Stablecoin—It’s a New Beginning From my perspective, Pi is not trying to replicate the financial systems we’re trying to move beyond. We will not use USD or US bonds as collateral. Instead, Pi is building something new—from the grassroots level. It is powered by people. By real usage. By trust. By merchants and pioneers exchanging real value in real life. We are walking our path. Not fast. Not flashy. But purposeful. Change doesn’t come overnight. It comes step by step, shaped by community, utility, and adoption. Focus on What Matters: Adoption, Utility, and Real Value Let’s not get distracted by daily price speculation. Price is not value. It’s just a number based on supply and demand. But value? That comes from usage. If pioneers are using Pi, and merchants are accepting Pi, we are creating real utility—real decentralized digital currency. And that’s what will eventually lead governments to recognize Pi—not because it was traded, but because it was used. Right now, millions of pioneers are still migrating. Recently, fewer than 10 million Pi coins were unlocked. Meanwhile, more utility DApps are being created, more merchants are accepting Pi, and demand is quietly building. This is how price will increase organically—through usage to increase Pi demand, not speculation. In fact, in the future, Pi may fix its value in code—especially once Open Mainnet is fully launched. As per the white paper algorithm will use blockchain data to decide the Pi Network progress. So we are still using partial Pi to create huge GCV data every day. That stability could allow DApps and ecosystems to flourish fairly. Imagine a world where Pi and Fiat conversion happens in a decentralized Pi-based DApp, like a digital bank—not on traditional crypto markets. What About the Current Price? Yes, prices like $0.45 may disappoint some. But think deeply: Are we here for quick small gains? Or for long-term transformation of your destiny, and the worldwide economy and finance? But we are not just waiting—we are building. Go look at the real Pi Mall. Some pioneers are already listing items like air conditioners for 5,000 Pi. That’s real-world utility. Even though the mall adopts a low Pi value, it is a real utility Value. Before implementing the Pi value code, the DApps Pi value will be based on the exchange market's price. This is a temporary not a final fixed Pi value. After OM, the mining speed will drop. New pioneers may only earn less than 1 Pi per year. Will new people still be motivated to join, knowing they can only earn 1 Pi annually? We must think bigger. We must think beyond ourselves. There are still over 8 billion people in the world without Pi. If you believe your future Pi holdings will make you too rich—give back. You can donate to the government. You can support the poor. You can build schools, fund hospitals, or empower communities. I share these thoughts because I believe deeply in the vision of Pi. Let’s study, educate, and share accurate information across all our groups and social platforms. Let’s lead by example. Let’s build the future together. The power is returning to the people. Doris Yin 🪷 🪷🪷

🌍Step by Step, We Are Defining Our Path To all GCV Ambassadors, community leaders, merchants, and dedicated pioneers—this message is for you. Recently, some pioneers asked: “Why hasn’t Pi Network become a stablecoin?” This question is even more relevant now that the U.S. Senate passed the Genius Bill, and President Trump has signed it into law. Yes, this marks progress in cryptocurrency regulation. But let’s be clear: stablecoins still belong to the fiat world. They are simply digital reflections of old money systems—backed by USD or U.S. Treasury bonds. They are “crypto” married to Fiat. Nothing revolutionary. Nothing decentralized. From Genius Bill, I think algorithmic stablecoins have been rejected, learning hard lessons from the Luna and UST collapse because no market confidence. Pi Network is Not a Stablecoin—It’s a New Beginning From my perspective, Pi is not trying to replicate the financial systems we’re trying to move beyond. We will not use USD or US bonds as collateral. Instead, Pi is building something new—from the grassroots level. It is powered by people. By real usage. By trust. By merchants and pioneers exchanging real value in real life. We are walking our path. Not fast. Not flashy. But purposeful. Change doesn’t come overnight. It comes step by step, shaped by community, utility, and adoption. Focus on What Matters: Adoption, Utility, and Real Value Let’s not get distracted by daily price speculation. Price is not value. It’s just a number based on supply and demand. But value? That comes from usage. If pioneers are using Pi, and merchants are accepting Pi, we are creating real utility—real decentralized digital currency. And that’s what will eventually lead governments to recognize Pi—not because it was traded, but because it was used. Right now, millions of pioneers are still migrating. Recently, fewer than 10 million Pi coins were unlocked. Meanwhile, more utility DApps are being created, more merchants are accepting Pi, and demand is quietly building. This is how price will increase organically—through usage to increase Pi demand, not speculation. In fact, in the future, Pi may fix its value in code—especially once Open Mainnet is fully launched. As per the white paper algorithm will use blockchain data to decide the Pi Network progress. So we are still using partial Pi to create huge GCV data every day. That stability could allow DApps and ecosystems to flourish fairly. Imagine a world where Pi and Fiat conversion happens in a decentralized Pi-based DApp, like a digital bank—not on traditional crypto markets. What About the Current Price? Yes, prices like $0.45 may disappoint some. But think deeply: Are we here for quick small gains? Or for long-term transformation of your destiny, and the worldwide economy and finance? But we are not just waiting—we are building. Go look at the real Pi Mall. Some pioneers are already listing items like air conditioners for 5,000 Pi. That’s real-world utility. Even though the mall adopts a low Pi value, it is a real utility Value. Before implementing the Pi value code, the DApps Pi value will be based on the exchange market's price. This is a temporary not a final fixed Pi value. After OM, the mining speed will drop. New pioneers may only earn less than 1 Pi per year. Will new people still be motivated to join, knowing they can only earn 1 Pi annually? We must think bigger. We must think beyond ourselves. There are still over 8 billion people in the world without Pi. If you believe your future Pi holdings will make you too rich—give back. You can donate to the government. You can support the poor. You can build schools, fund hospitals, or empower communities. I share these thoughts because I believe deeply in the vision of Pi. Let’s study, educate, and share accurate information across all our groups and social platforms. Let’s lead by example. Let’s build the future together. The power is returning to the people. Doris Yin 🪷 🪷🪷

Doris Yin 东方紫莲🪷

17,806 views • 1 year ago