Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Guest: A responsible DOJ would have had a press conference, and they would have talked through the measures they took. You know that there is a problem when they do this through a short-form announcement on Fox News that doesn't answer any of that.

FactPost

171,320 subscribers

28,736 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Katie Phang on the Trump regime's weaponization of the DOJ: "This type of weaponization of prosecution is a telltale sign that they know that they don't have control and they know that they don't have the support of the American people, because that's what you do in an autocracy and that's what you do in a fascist state."

Katie Phang on the Trump regime's weaponization of the DOJ: "This type of weaponization of prosecution is a telltale sign that they know that they don't have control and they know that they don't have the support of the American people, because that's what you do in an autocracy and that's what you do in a fascist state."

MeidasClips

35,281 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Partners think that by discussing money, it may signal the wrong thing. It may be that they don't have any and they don't want to disclose that, or it may be that they have a bad financial past. And yet, that's exactly what you wanna know. I mean, you have to deal with this problem. And I would argue that if every couple went through the prenup experience, it would actually build a better foundation for marriage.

Partners think that by discussing money, it may signal the wrong thing. It may be that they don't have any and they don't want to disclose that, or it may be that they have a bad financial past. And yet, that's exactly what you wanna know. I mean, you have to deal with this problem. And I would argue that if every couple went through the prenup experience, it would actually build a better foundation for marriage.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

21,681 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Trump on Iran: But I don't know if we're going to have a deal. We may just do it without a deal. These people, they lie and they cheat. For instance, they agreed we'll never have a nuclear weapon. They have a news conference where they LEAK that we never discussed the subject. Now, who would believe that?

Trump on Iran: But I don't know if we're going to have a deal. We may just do it without a deal. These people, they lie and they cheat. For instance, they agreed we'll never have a nuclear weapon. They have a news conference where they LEAK that we never discussed the subject. Now, who would believe that?

Acyn

33,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

.President Donald J. Trump on Iran: "We have had very, very strong talks. We'll see where they lead. We have major points of agreement... They went, I would say perfectly. I would say that if they carry through with that, it'll end that problem, that conflict."

.President Donald J. Trump on Iran: "We have had very, very strong talks. We'll see where they lead. We have major points of agreement... They went, I would say perfectly. I would say that if they carry through with that, it'll end that problem, that conflict."

Rapid Response 47

581,088 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

‼️"Ritchie Torres Ain't Shit" (w/ Michael Blake)‼️ "I have talked about how in that [AIPAC] meeting when apartheid came up, they shut the meeting down. I have talked about how people have absolutely gone after us for calling it a genocide. And so, to the dynamic of: 'what would you do differently?' If it's here and now, of course, hindsight always twenty-twenty, would you go on a trip knowing what you know about AIPAC? No, of course not. I wouldn't. But I didn't know that then. And I just think that there is a scenario where I would hope that people would recognize that when you learn, you do better. That is what I've done."

‼️"Ritchie Torres Ain't Shit" (w/ Michael Blake)‼️ "I have talked about how in that [AIPAC] meeting when apartheid came up, they shut the meeting down. I have talked about how people have absolutely gone after us for calling it a genocide. And so, to the dynamic of: 'what would you do differently?' If it's here and now, of course, hindsight always twenty-twenty, would you go on a trip knowing what you know about AIPAC? No, of course not. I wouldn't. But I didn't know that then. And I just think that there is a scenario where I would hope that people would recognize that when you learn, you do better. That is what I've done."

Briahna Joy Gray

13,083 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trump on Venezuela: They had tragedy the other day with the problem, the terrible problem. I guess you would call it an earthquake. But outside of that, they have a happy country

Trump on Venezuela: They had tragedy the other day with the problem, the terrible problem. I guess you would call it an earthquake. But outside of that, they have a happy country

Acyn

34,697 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

The DOJ was caught spying on members of Congress that were searching through the Jeffrey Epstein files which is a breach of their rights.Pam Bondi had printed out pages about everything they accessed to do with the Epstein files so she would know what they would be asking her!

The DOJ was caught spying on members of Congress that were searching through the Jeffrey Epstein files which is a breach of their rights.Pam Bondi had printed out pages about everything they accessed to do with the Epstein files so she would know what they would be asking her!

Suzie rizzio

338,071 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump: When I was president, I demanded that this guy, the governor, accept the water coming from the north, from way up in Canada. And, you know, the north, it flows down through right through Los Angeles. I mean, massive millions and millions of gallons of water a week, probably, I think, even a day. Massive amounts coming out from the mountains, from the melts. And even without it, even during the summer, it's a natural flow of water. They would have had so much water they wouldn't have known what to do with it. You would have never had the fires. People would have been able to sprinkle their lawns and everything else. You know, the problem is it's so dry. It was always so dry there. And it's just it's just a mess. They could have maintained their forests.

Trump: When I was president, I demanded that this guy, the governor, accept the water coming from the north, from way up in Canada. And, you know, the north, it flows down through right through Los Angeles. I mean, massive millions and millions of gallons of water a week, probably, I think, even a day. Massive amounts coming out from the mountains, from the melts. And even without it, even during the summer, it's a natural flow of water. They would have had so much water they wouldn't have known what to do with it. You would have never had the fires. People would have been able to sprinkle their lawns and everything else. You know, the problem is it's so dry. It was always so dry there. And it's just it's just a mess. They could have maintained their forests.

Acyn

3,404,256 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here is an example of an IRGC missile malfunctioning and dropping in Iran. This could have easily been what hit that building of school girls. If the Regime has no problem slaughtering it's own civilians, do you think they would have a problem lying to you and I to get what they want? I think the obvious answer to that is no.

Here is an example of an IRGC missile malfunctioning and dropping in Iran. This could have easily been what hit that building of school girls. If the Regime has no problem slaughtering it's own civilians, do you think they would have a problem lying to you and I to get what they want? I think the obvious answer to that is no.

Jeffery Mead

141,066 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Goldman on Abrego Garcia: "If he had due process he would not have been removed. Then they would've had to go through the process of proving it. And this is why due process matters -- so you don't make mistakes like this. And that you do have a neutral arbiter that decides the law. Not the executive branch."

Goldman on Abrego Garcia: "If he had due process he would not have been removed. Then they would've had to go through the process of proving it. And this is why due process matters -- so you don't make mistakes like this. And that you do have a neutral arbiter that decides the law. Not the executive branch."

Aaron Rupar

305,296 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🎯 $GME Financial Advice: "If the longs had known that they have the right to ask for their shares.. and, and they really wanted a Short Squeeze then thats what they would have done" -CEO of Interactive Brokers Thomas Peterffy There you have it. #GMERICA 🇺🇸

🎯 $GME Financial Advice: "If the longs had known that they have the right to ask for their shares.. and, and they really wanted a Short Squeeze then thats what they would have done" -CEO of Interactive Brokers Thomas Peterffy There you have it. #GMERICA 🇺🇸

Edwinbarnesc 🇺🇸

307,382 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Trump on Iran: The one thing, right up front, no nuclear weapons. If we could have made that deal two years ago, we would have made that deal. But they weren’t willing to do that. Now they are willing to do it. They’re willing to do much more than they would have a year and a half ago. If they would have offered this deal originally when we first started, it would have been accepted immediately.

Trump on Iran: The one thing, right up front, no nuclear weapons. If we could have made that deal two years ago, we would have made that deal. But they weren’t willing to do that. Now they are willing to do it. They’re willing to do much more than they would have a year and a half ago. If they would have offered this deal originally when we first started, it would have been accepted immediately.

Open Source Intel

74,303 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

Eric Daugherty

18,840 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trump: Well, at the UN we had a problem with the teleprompter. We had another problem that nobody has actually talked about. The people in the room didn't hear my speech. Did you know that? They didn't have any loudspeakers and they didn't hear my speech, and I thought I made a really good speech. I mean, considering I didn't have the use of a teleprompter, which is unusual, but I made a speech.

Trump: Well, at the UN we had a problem with the teleprompter. We had another problem that nobody has actually talked about. The people in the room didn't hear my speech. Did you know that? They didn't have any loudspeakers and they didn't hear my speech, and I thought I made a really good speech. I mean, considering I didn't have the use of a teleprompter, which is unusual, but I made a speech.

FactPost

279,934 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen