Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Guys, stop underestimating the harness. GPT-5.6 Sol through Claude Code vs Codex produced a GIGANTIC difference in my benchmark. But Opus 5 is the real innovation: High, xHigh, and Max don’t just feel like different thinking levels—they feel like COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODELS. It’s basically like getting three or four...

OmedVibeCodes's profile picture

OmedTheVibeCoder

1,355 subscribers

36,074 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.
0:28

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.

OmedTheVibeCoder

12,823 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?
0:56

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇
0:20

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6 I handed the same unfinished drawing to four different AI models and said "be creative." Rumoured Gemini 4 checkpoint is inside Arena. four completely different pandas came out. and I genuinely can't pick a favorite 👇

Poonam Soni

37,910 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model
5:22

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model

Melvyn • Builder

79,048 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.
3:53

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

59,604 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Opus 5 High might be the most ridiculous model I’ve ever tested. It produced this result in around ONE HOUR. Fable 5 needed almost 3 hours. GPT-5.6 Sol worked for over an hour and still created almost nothing compared to this. Opus 5 didn’t just win. It completely OUTCLASSED them.
0:38

Opus 5 High might be the most ridiculous model I’ve ever tested. It produced this result in around ONE HOUR. Fable 5 needed almost 3 hours. GPT-5.6 Sol worked for over an hour and still created almost nothing compared to this. Opus 5 didn’t just win. It completely OUTCLASSED them.

OmedTheVibeCoder

39,729 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Two frontier models. Two very different demos. (GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5) GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra was pushed in a mathematical direction and generated a Minecraft-style clone in Lean. Yes, that Lean. Meanwhile, Claude Fable 5 took a game development route and built a Minecraft mod featuring a Dark Souls-inspired enemy with multiple attack patterns, combos, and combat logic. They're solving completely different problems, but both are great examples of how capable today's models have become. The pace of progress is remarkable.
0:49

Two frontier models. Two very different demos. (GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5) GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra was pushed in a mathematical direction and generated a Minecraft-style clone in Lean. Yes, that Lean. Meanwhile, Claude Fable 5 took a game development route and built a Minecraft mod featuring a Dark Souls-inspired enemy with multiple attack patterns, combos, and combat logic. They're solving completely different problems, but both are great examples of how capable today's models have become. The pace of progress is remarkable.

FHILY👑

19,336 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

DeepSeek V4 Flash completely failed this test. Compared to Opus 4.8, GPT-5.6 Sol, Kimi K3, and the other current top models, it’s honestly not good. The gap is massive. Against Luna, however, it performs similarly well. Both have different strengths and weaknesses, so I still need to test them more. The weird part: the Pi harness performed worse than OpenCode for DeepSeek. More tests are coming, guys. Don’t worry
0:38

DeepSeek V4 Flash completely failed this test. Compared to Opus 4.8, GPT-5.6 Sol, Kimi K3, and the other current top models, it’s honestly not good. The gap is massive. Against Luna, however, it performs similarly well. Both have different strengths and weaknesses, so I still need to test them more. The weird part: the Pi harness performed worse than OpenCode for DeepSeek. More tests are coming, guys. Don’t worry

OmedTheVibeCoder

26,166 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GLM 5.3, GPT 5.6 Luna, Claude Opus 5, Grok 4.6, DeepSeek V4, Kimi K3, and a cloud browser for agents - all FREE. > DuckDuckGo: GPT 5.6 Luna and older models, no signup: > LM Arena: free side-by-side, Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Qwen 3.8 Max: > Nvidia NIM: Kimi K3 free, 40 requests/minute: > OpenCode: 7 free models including DeepSeek V4 Flash, no API key: > Bright Data: 5K credits/month, cloud browser, MCP for agents: Anthropic just dropped Fable 5.1 today - new benchmark leader. Meanwhile the free tier keeps growing. The gap between paid and open keeps shrinking.
0:30

GLM 5.3, GPT 5.6 Luna, Claude Opus 5, Grok 4.6, DeepSeek V4, Kimi K3, and a cloud browser for agents - all FREE. > DuckDuckGo: GPT 5.6 Luna and older models, no signup: > LM Arena: free side-by-side, Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Qwen 3.8 Max: > Nvidia NIM: Kimi K3 free, 40 requests/minute: > OpenCode: 7 free models including DeepSeek V4 Flash, no API key: > Bright Data: 5K credits/month, cloud browser, MCP for agents: Anthropic just dropped Fable 5.1 today - new benchmark leader. Meanwhile the free tier keeps growing. The gap between paid and open keeps shrinking.

ＺＥＦＩ

29,454 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

Found a way to get $125-$200 in FREE ai credits for gpt-5.6 sol, claude opus 5 and opus 4.8 😳 agentrouter is a non-profit version of openrouter. one api key, no card. credits land on your account at signup. what you get for $0: -$125-200 in credits on signup (github only) -claude opus 5, gpt-5.6 sol, opus 4.8 through one key -free models -openai-compatible (works with anything) what this replaces: -paid frontier API costs for coding agents -claude opus 4.8: $15/M in, $75/M out -gpt-5.6 sol: $25/M out how to grab yours (2 min): 1. go to → sign in with github (important) 2. console → create your api key 3. base url: 4. pick a model and go Works in hermes, claude code, cursor, aider and any openai-compatible tools Important: github-only signup, older accounts get the full credit, fresh ones may get less. credits are one-time. referral adds +$100 use this before they tighten the offer
0:27

Found a way to get $125-$200 in FREE ai credits for gpt-5.6 sol, claude opus 5 and opus 4.8 😳 agentrouter is a non-profit version of openrouter. one api key, no card. credits land on your account at signup. what you get for $0: -$125-200 in credits on signup (github only) -claude opus 5, gpt-5.6 sol, opus 4.8 through one key -free models -openai-compatible (works with anything) what this replaces: -paid frontier API costs for coding agents -claude opus 4.8: $15/M in, $75/M out -gpt-5.6 sol: $25/M out how to grab yours (2 min): 1. go to → sign in with github (important) 2. console → create your api key 3. base url: 4. pick a model and go Works in hermes, claude code, cursor, aider and any openai-compatible tools Important: github-only signup, older accounts get the full credit, fresh ones may get less. credits are one-time. referral adds +$100 use this before they tighten the offer

painn

109,551 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Crazy. Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 on 3d modeling at 2/3 the price We tested Opus 5, Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol on the same prompt: build an explorable Japanese suburban street in Three.js, full 3D, rendered like a hand-drawn anime background. All on Max effort. Opus 5 took the longest but delivered the most varied scenery: clean dark outlines, flat cel-shaded color bands, dense street details down to the vending machine signage. Fable paid more attention to details, and while GPT 5.6 Sol was 3-4x cheaper and the fastest, but the render shows it: sparse, washed out, barely styled. Opus 5: 1hr 21min · $26.7 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $35 GPT 5.6 Sol: 41min · $7.1
0:34

Crazy. Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 on 3d modeling at 2/3 the price We tested Opus 5, Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol on the same prompt: build an explorable Japanese suburban street in Three.js, full 3D, rendered like a hand-drawn anime background. All on Max effort. Opus 5 took the longest but delivered the most varied scenery: clean dark outlines, flat cel-shaded color bands, dense street details down to the vending machine signage. Fable paid more attention to details, and while GPT 5.6 Sol was 3-4x cheaper and the fastest, but the render shows it: sparse, washed out, barely styled. Opus 5: 1hr 21min · $26.7 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $35 GPT 5.6 Sol: 41min · $7.1

GMI Cloud

54,140 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself
1:03

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

696,175 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.
0:30

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.

GMI Cloud

320,134 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.
0:22

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Bhavy☄️

64,542 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

GPT 5.6 Sol & Terra just made Fable 5's pricing look like a joke! We gave OpenAI's top models (Sol, Terra) and Anthropic's top models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8) the same 3 prompts: • Supernova boom • Meteor hitting a city • Solar system model The bill: Sol: $4.77 Terra: $1.24 Fable 5: $9.94 Opus 4.8: $2.46 Outputs came out surprisingly close. The prices didn't. Fable 5 cost unreasonably more than everything else, with Sol not far behind. Considering latest Fable 5 nerf, it's hard to see what you're paying for.
0:20

GPT 5.6 Sol & Terra just made Fable 5's pricing look like a joke! We gave OpenAI's top models (Sol, Terra) and Anthropic's top models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8) the same 3 prompts: • Supernova boom • Meteor hitting a city • Solar system model The bill: Sol: $4.77 Terra: $1.24 Fable 5: $9.94 Opus 4.8: $2.46 Outputs came out surprisingly close. The prices didn't. Fable 5 cost unreasonably more than everything else, with Sol not far behind. Considering latest Fable 5 nerf, it's hard to see what you're paying for.

AI/ML API

149,158 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Grok 4.6 seems like a big improvement I gave it, along with Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Qwen 3.8 Max, a banana. Then asked them to be CREATIVE and do object-integrated drawings Here's how they turned out Grok 4.6 thought the banana can be a tiny island 😆
0:21

Grok 4.6 seems like a big improvement I gave it, along with Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Qwen 3.8 Max, a banana. Then asked them to be CREATIVE and do object-integrated drawings Here's how they turned out Grok 4.6 thought the banana can be a tiny island 😆

Ann Nguyen

254,731 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

THIS GUY PUT FABLE, GPT 5.6 SOL, AND OPUS IN ONE SHARED CHAT AND HAS THEM TAG EACH OTHER LIKE COWORKERS instead of running three separate models in three separate windows and copy pasting between them, they all sit in one room and talk to each other > you tag whichever model you want and only that one responds > they tag each other too, so fable can hand something to opus, opus can pull in sol for a second opinion > each agent only sees the messages theyre mentioned in, but you get to read everything > he had them running and orchestrating together for more than a day straight the best part is how different each one actually behaves: > fable is the creative product manager. huge context window so it remembers everything, and its the one finding the out of the box solutions > sol is the obsessive tech lead. it will trace every bug to the exact source and stress test every edge case before writing a single line > opus is the workhorse engineer. smart enough for almost anything, and it constantly questions things, which forces the other two to re-examine their own solutions its like managing a team. one plans, one writes the code, one reviews it, and they hand work back and forth without you playing middleman everyone else is arguing about which model is best right now, but the real play is making them work together at the same time
1:11

THIS GUY PUT FABLE, GPT 5.6 SOL, AND OPUS IN ONE SHARED CHAT AND HAS THEM TAG EACH OTHER LIKE COWORKERS instead of running three separate models in three separate windows and copy pasting between them, they all sit in one room and talk to each other > you tag whichever model you want and only that one responds > they tag each other too, so fable can hand something to opus, opus can pull in sol for a second opinion > each agent only sees the messages theyre mentioned in, but you get to read everything > he had them running and orchestrating together for more than a day straight the best part is how different each one actually behaves: > fable is the creative product manager. huge context window so it remembers everything, and its the one finding the out of the box solutions > sol is the obsessive tech lead. it will trace every bug to the exact source and stress test every edge case before writing a single line > opus is the workhorse engineer. smart enough for almost anything, and it constantly questions things, which forces the other two to re-examine their own solutions its like managing a team. one plans, one writes the code, one reviews it, and they hand work back and forth without you playing middleman everyone else is arguing about which model is best right now, but the real play is making them work together at the same time

Om Patel

22,998 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

What happens when you give the quant trader’s bible to two frontier AI models? The Green Book is what traders use to prepare for firms like SIG and HRT, where I interned. And in high-frequency quant trading, being right isn’t enough. You have to be first. Inside Codex, I extracted all 183 questions and their official solutions. Then I gave GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast (via API) on Cerebras and Claude Opus 5 the exact same test, timed every answer, and blind-graded the results. One finished nearly three times faster, and got more answers right.
0:55

What happens when you give the quant trader’s bible to two frontier AI models? The Green Book is what traders use to prepare for firms like SIG and HRT, where I interned. And in high-frequency quant trading, being right isn’t enough. You have to be first. Inside Codex, I extracted all 183 questions and their official solutions. Then I gave GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast (via API) on Cerebras and Claude Opus 5 the exact same test, timed every answer, and blind-graded the results. One finished nearly three times faster, and got more answers right.

Sarah Chieng

25,433 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.
18:51

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.

Movez

552,332 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Everyone's debating whether Opus or Codex or Gemini writes better code this month. Jyothi thinks that's the wrong question entirely. Models get replaced. Rankings flip every few months. Whatever wins the coding benchmark this quarter loses it next quarter, and the debate resets to zero. The harness doesn't reset. Memory, evaluators, the systems your model actually plugs into. That's what determines your output, not which brain sits at the center. Two people using the same model get completely different results depending on what's wired around it. Optimizing for productivity means optimizing the harness, not chasing the leaderboard. Stop switching models. Start building the harness.
3:01

Everyone's debating whether Opus or Codex or Gemini writes better code this month. Jyothi thinks that's the wrong question entirely. Models get replaced. Rankings flip every few months. Whatever wins the coding benchmark this quarter loses it next quarter, and the debate resets to zero. The harness doesn't reset. Memory, evaluators, the systems your model actually plugs into. That's what determines your output, not which brain sits at the center. Two people using the same model get completely different results depending on what's wired around it. Optimizing for productivity means optimizing the harness, not chasing the leaderboard. Stop switching models. Start building the harness.

Aakash Gupta

17,219 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce