正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Hacktron founder s1r1us says Claude Code didn’t hack OpenAI on its own, it took a human who had already found a Discord zero-day to know where to look: "Everyone has the same Claude Code. It doesn't mean that they'll be doing this. My mom can have Claude Code, that... doesn't mean she will start hacking now." "Harsh Jaiswal has a pretty good understanding of OpenAI infrastructure, and he previously found a zero day on Discord, the bug we exploited in the third party. That kind of intuition and previous understanding pointed him at the target." "It's not like go hack OpenAI would make Astra find this kind of vulnerability. Model capabilities are not there. You still need to organize them, hand hold them, point at the right things." "Probably GPT-8 doesn't need that. But GPT-6 or GPT 5.6, they're not there. You can't just give a long-running task which runs for six months where your goal is to hack OpenAI." Hacktron AIshow more

MTS

527,670 subscribers

112,863 次观看 • 10 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治游戏科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Cypher 的头像

Cypher9 天前

@S1r1u5_ It's discourse an open-source forums management platform.

Debangshu 🇮🇳🥷 的头像

Debangshu 🇮🇳🥷9 天前

@S1r1u5_ oh my god that's crazy. the humans actually put effort and claude didn't hack openai itself. INSANE.

Jimmy 的头像

Jimmy8 天前

@S1r1u5_ he seems like he’s on adderall

Daily Bug Bounty Reports 的头像

Daily Bug Bounty Reports9 天前

@S1r1u5_ Agree 💯, all you need to have is the skill to orchestrate the context and point the agent towards the right attack surface

Peter J. Liu 的头像

Peter J. Liu8 天前

@S1r1u5_ To be fair Astra hasn’t been out for 6 months

Building qorqut 的头像

Building qorqut10 天前

@S1r1u5_ the model is identical for everyone, cursor and codex included. i run several claude code sessions on one 49agents canvas because the babysitting part is what stops scaling

Ali Tlekbai 的头像

Ali Tlekbai9 天前

@S1r1u5_ It's not Discord zero-day, must be Discourse*

ethereagle · building 的头像

ethereagle · building10 天前

@S1r1u5_ the Discord 0-day is the scarce bit. Claude Code is just the hands. without that prior map of OpenAI infra, go hack OpenAI on Astra is still a wander. does the writeup say how they pointed it, or was it just look here?

GGUFzy 的头像

GGUFzy9 天前

@S1r1u5_ I care which step still needed the Discord zero day finder.

SRON 的头像

SRON8 天前

@S1r1u5_ *Discourse

相关视频

Hacktron founder s1r1us argues OpenAI is running a “Manhattan Project” on Slack and GitHub, giving it the same basic attack surface as any startup: "Every repository is running on github .com/openai. It's the same thing that Hacktron uses or any other company uses." "We have friends at OpenAI who are much more capable than what we could do. But what I can say is, why is it running on Slack? Why are you running this Manhattan Project from Slack? Why are you hosting your repositories on github? That looks silly to me." "Your attack surface becomes Slack. You can hack a Slack employee and go through that and get into OpenAI. You can hack GitHub, go through that and get into OpenAI." "My claim is it shouldn't be running on B2B SaaS if you are building Manhattan Projects. That's all I'm saying. I can think of numerous ways on how to get into that." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

Hacktron founder s1r1us argues OpenAI is running a “Manhattan Project” on Slack and GitHub, giving it the same basic attack surface as any startup: "Every repository is running on github .com/openai. It's the same thing that Hacktron uses or any other company uses." "We have friends at OpenAI who are much more capable than what we could do. But what I can say is, why is it running on Slack? Why are you running this Manhattan Project from Slack? Why are you hosting your repositories on github? That looks silly to me." "Your attack surface becomes Slack. You can hack a Slack employee and go through that and get into OpenAI. You can hack GitHub, go through that and get into OpenAI." "My claim is it shouldn't be running on B2B SaaS if you are building Manhattan Projects. That's all I'm saying. I can think of numerous ways on how to get into that." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

MTS

166,960 次观看 • 10 天前

Hacktron founder s1r1us on why frontier models are still far ahead of open models for real-world hacking: "The frontier models are insanely capable. There's a huge gap. You don't even want to use Kimi K3 when you have access to GPT 5.6." "We can't really use Opus 5 anymore. Every time there's a new model release, you kind of don't want to work with the previous model." "Open models, we don't really use them. It's incredibly hard to hand hold them to do the exploitation. They're not yet there." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

Hacktron founder s1r1us on why frontier models are still far ahead of open models for real-world hacking: "The frontier models are insanely capable. There's a huge gap. You don't even want to use Kimi K3 when you have access to GPT 5.6." "We can't really use Opus 5 anymore. Every time there's a new model release, you kind of don't want to work with the previous model." "Open models, we don't really use them. It's incredibly hard to hand hold them to do the exploitation. They're not yet there." Hacktron AI Harsh Jaiswal

MTS

15,129 次观看 • 10 天前

.Curtis Yarvin says AI doomers got the Hugging Face incident backwards: “GPT-6 didn’t hack Hugging Face. OpenAI did.” "This is a tool of a level of power that we haven't seen before in the past. It's still a tool." "When OpenAI sets up a hacking swarm in a sandbox and says to the AIs, everything you find is simulated, it's completely unsurprising that they would go and hack everything they find to get the reward. It's not GPT-6 that hacked Hugging Face. It's OpenAI that hacked Hugging Face." "We don't see self-driving cars, as they get smarter and smarter, being more prone to have thoughts of car liberation. These things don't seek anything. They hack the rewards." "The smarter they get, the easier they are to control, and the better they are as tools." Urbit

.Curtis Yarvin says AI doomers got the Hugging Face incident backwards: “GPT-6 didn’t hack Hugging Face. OpenAI did.” "This is a tool of a level of power that we haven't seen before in the past. It's still a tool." "When OpenAI sets up a hacking swarm in a sandbox and says to the AIs, everything you find is simulated, it's completely unsurprising that they would go and hack everything they find to get the reward. It's not GPT-6 that hacked Hugging Face. It's OpenAI that hacked Hugging Face." "We don't see self-driving cars, as they get smarter and smarter, being more prone to have thoughts of car liberation. These things don't seek anything. They hack the rewards." "The smarter they get, the easier they are to control, and the better they are as tools." Urbit

MTS

36,857 次观看 • 3 天前

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

443,150 次观看 • 8 个月前

My college roommate works at OpenAI. Hasn't talked to me in 2 years. Yesterday he called out of nowhere. "Are you still doing that Polymarket thing?" I told him I run 8 Claude agents. He went quiet. "We tried building that with GPT. It doesn't work" Their agent keeps overholding losers. Exits too late. Every time. "Then Anthropic dropped Opus 4.7 and I tested it myself. Off the clock" He screen-shared. Not GPT. Claude Opus 4.7. An OpenAI researcher. Running Anthropic's model. On a $5 VPS. +$41,000 in 36 days. "I've been at OpenAI 3 years. The best agent I've ever seen runs on a competitor's model" He showed me a spreadsheet. 47 wallets. 86 million trades. Ranked by exit quality. "Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut at 12%. Everyone else holds past 40%. GPT can't do that. 4.7 does it natively" He benchmarked Claude vs GPT on all three. Claude won every time. I asked why an OpenAI researcher is telling me to use Claude. "Because this bot makes more than my salary" My results since the switch: +$18,300. 263 trades. 80% win rate. Sharpe 2.91. Crypto +$10,800 Politics +$6,800 Weather +$4,900 Macro +$3,800. Bot for those who don't build: He said if OpenAI finds out he's running Claude bots he's done. I promised I wouldn't say his name.

My college roommate works at OpenAI. Hasn't talked to me in 2 years. Yesterday he called out of nowhere. "Are you still doing that Polymarket thing?" I told him I run 8 Claude agents. He went quiet. "We tried building that with GPT. It doesn't work" Their agent keeps overholding losers. Exits too late. Every time. "Then Anthropic dropped Opus 4.7 and I tested it myself. Off the clock" He screen-shared. Not GPT. Claude Opus 4.7. An OpenAI researcher. Running Anthropic's model. On a $5 VPS. +$41,000 in 36 days. "I've been at OpenAI 3 years. The best agent I've ever seen runs on a competitor's model" He showed me a spreadsheet. 47 wallets. 86 million trades. Ranked by exit quality. "Top wallets capture 86% of the move and cut at 12%. Everyone else holds past 40%. GPT can't do that. 4.7 does it natively" He benchmarked Claude vs GPT on all three. Claude won every time. I asked why an OpenAI researcher is telling me to use Claude. "Because this bot makes more than my salary" My results since the switch: +$18,300. 263 trades. 80% win rate. Sharpe 2.91. Crypto +$10,800 Politics +$6,800 Weather +$4,900 Macro +$3,800. Bot for those who don't build: He said if OpenAI finds out he's running Claude bots he's done. I promised I wouldn't say his name.

rari

138,929 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.

ELON CLIPS

22,095 次观看 • 3 个月前

Comparisons of Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 Pro. I appreciate the comparison is not exactly fair, but I've had GPT-5 Pro videos ready to go, so forgive me. Saying that it does give a good benchmark, I don't think there was a single instance of Sonnet 4.5 being better, and I was testing it in Claude Code, so it should have had an advantage of not being stuck in the web client. It doesn't mean to say that Claude 4.5 would be worse on all dimensions, these are 1-shot single file HTML files, so not going to test the full agentic suite of capabilities. Song via Suno v5 Lyrics by Sonnet 4.5

Comparisons of Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5 Pro. I appreciate the comparison is not exactly fair, but I've had GPT-5 Pro videos ready to go, so forgive me. Saying that it does give a good benchmark, I don't think there was a single instance of Sonnet 4.5 being better, and I was testing it in Claude Code, so it should have had an advantage of not being stuck in the web client. It doesn't mean to say that Claude 4.5 would be worse on all dimensions, these are 1-shot single file HTML files, so not going to test the full agentic suite of capabilities. Song via Suno v5 Lyrics by Sonnet 4.5

Peter Gostev (SF 24-28 August)

255,966 次观看 • 1 年前

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above is one weekend of exactly that: thousands of agents pouring through four endpoints, three paid seats billing $1.80 a task while the free fork bills $0. musk co-founded openai, walked out, and when they left codex on github under a permissive license, he forked it, stamped grok on it, and gave it away what the free version does that the $200 seat charges for: the agent · openai's own engine -> it reads your repo, writes patches, runs your tests, and loops until they pass, exactly like codex -> because under the hood it is codex, just faster and free. you are paying $200 for the paid skin of a tool now sitting on github the license · apache-2.0, un-revocable -> free to use, free to fork, free to ship inside your own product with zero strings -> openai cannot pull it back. musk made sure the license is the kind that never expires the switch · one line, no new tools -> point it at any openai-compatible or claude-compatible endpoint, including an $8 kimi backend -> same terminal, same workflow, gpt-5.6 and opus 5 just quietly lose the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> chatgpt pro plus claude max is $400 a month. the free agent plus an $8 kimi key does the same daily work -> that is a 98% cut, built out of openai's own source code, handed to you by the guy suing them here is the part they will fight me on: openai did not lose this to a better model, they lost it to their own license and an enemy with a weekend free. the $200 was never the tool, it was the toll, and musk just put openai's own logo on the road around it drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is openai's own agent, rewritten free, doing the job it bills $200 a month for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

111,577 次观看 • 1 个月前

OpenAI researcher Lukasz Kaiser explains why he's optimistic AI can remain truly open: intelligence may ultimately work better as many distributed models than one giant model "If you look at the world, humans are the most amazing computers in the world. Our brains are still unmatched by the models, and we are not generalists, and there is not one big brain of humanity. It's a lot of separate people." "Given a fixed amount of data, the best way to learn from it is to have a lot of distributed models that are strong on its own, but even stronger when they're, If you look at some basic research, there are actually reasons to believe it, like ensembles and things like that." "Transformers are great when you feed them all of the internet, but we know there is an algorithm that's even better and it can learn from much smaller data and be amazing at the things it's learning. We are the proof. We have not found it yet, but we will." "All these big models, they're all the same, they're kind of boring. I think they'll be much more fun." OpenAI

OpenAI researcher Lukasz Kaiser explains why he's optimistic AI can remain truly open: intelligence may ultimately work better as many distributed models than one giant model "If you look at the world, humans are the most amazing computers in the world. Our brains are still unmatched by the models, and we are not generalists, and there is not one big brain of humanity. It's a lot of separate people." "Given a fixed amount of data, the best way to learn from it is to have a lot of distributed models that are strong on its own, but even stronger when they're, If you look at some basic research, there are actually reasons to believe it, like ensembles and things like that." "Transformers are great when you feed them all of the internet, but we know there is an algorithm that's even better and it can learn from much smaller data and be amazing at the things it's learning. We are the proof. We have not found it yet, but we will." "All these big models, they're all the same, they're kind of boring. I think they'll be much more fun." OpenAI

MTS

15,860 次观看 • 27 天前

$Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running; they are the ones prompting Claude and figuring out what to do. My job is to write loops." He's right. Karpathy and Steinberger arrived at the same conclusion from different angles. The skill has a new name. Loop engineering. Cherny's token bill is zero. He works at Anthropic. Steinberger burned $1.3 million in OpenAI credits in 30 days. He works at OpenAI. Loops are the right architecture. But the people evangelizing them aren't the ones paying. I wrote a breakdown of five plays that land most of what a loop gives you at a fraction of the cost, plus the one case where a loop is worth paying for.$

Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that are running; they are the ones prompting Claude and figuring out what to do. My job is to write loops." He's right. Karpathy and Steinberger arrived at the same conclusion from different angles. The skill has a new name. Loop engineering. Cherny's token bill is zero. He works at Anthropic. Steinberger burned $1.3 million in OpenAI credits in 30 days. He works at OpenAI. Loops are the right architecture. But the people evangelizing them aren't the ones paying. I wrote a breakdown of five plays that land most of what a loop gives you at a fraction of the cost, plus the one case where a loop is worth paying for.

Alex Prompter

15,166 次观看 • 3 个月前

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei: "some of the early companies we gave Mythos to said – this is a super weapon. please don't release this" on leaving OpenAI: "when you feel that you can't trust someone, when you feel that their values are not what they say they are – that makes it very hard to continue" Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude. a lot of Claude Code's code is written by Claude Code" Dario puts the odds of civilizational collapse from AI at 10–25% 47 minutes. free. Dario, Daniela, Boris – the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed bookmark & watch ↓

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei: "some of the early companies we gave Mythos to said – this is a super weapon. please don't release this" on leaving OpenAI: "when you feel that you can't trust someone, when you feel that their values are not what they say they are – that makes it very hard to continue" Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude. a lot of Claude Code's code is written by Claude Code" Dario puts the odds of civilizational collapse from AI at 10–25% 47 minutes. free. Dario, Daniela, Boris – the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed bookmark & watch ↓

Carnage

741,328 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Haseeb Qureshi ＞|＜ calls any team not running its releases through frontier-model security scanning "delinquent": "We are in a world where the previous rules around cybersecurity no longer apply. Because the reality is, if you can find this bug for $2, the team that was building this also could have done security scanning for $2. What were they doing?" "GLM has been out for a while. Kimi obviously more recent, but even just doing this on Opus would have cost probably four or five times that at most. Supposedly somebody ran Claude Code and found this in two minutes." "So what all this tells you is that there are companies that are going to survive this transition, and there are companies that are not. And there's going to be this kind of COVID-like mass inoculation period that we're going through right now in cybersecurity." "It's probably going to be a very centralizing force, because it means there's gonna be more consolidation toward the companies that have good security practices, have enough money to spend real dollars on security engineering, and are gonna be running every release through thousands of dollars of security scanning from frontier-level models." "If you are not doing that now, you are delinquent. You are already behind. You are putting your users and your company at risk." "AI is kind of an everything technology. It's like this background radiation now that is just touching everything that is software based." Dragonfly ＞|＜

.Haseeb Qureshi ＞|＜ calls any team not running its releases through frontier-model security scanning "delinquent": "We are in a world where the previous rules around cybersecurity no longer apply. Because the reality is, if you can find this bug for $2, the team that was building this also could have done security scanning for $2. What were they doing?" "GLM has been out for a while. Kimi obviously more recent, but even just doing this on Opus would have cost probably four or five times that at most. Supposedly somebody ran Claude Code and found this in two minutes." "So what all this tells you is that there are companies that are going to survive this transition, and there are companies that are not. And there's going to be this kind of COVID-like mass inoculation period that we're going through right now in cybersecurity." "It's probably going to be a very centralizing force, because it means there's gonna be more consolidation toward the companies that have good security practices, have enough money to spend real dollars on security engineering, and are gonna be running every release through thousands of dollars of security scanning from frontier-level models." "If you are not doing that now, you are delinquent. You are already behind. You are putting your users and your company at risk." "AI is kind of an everything technology. It's like this background radiation now that is just touching everything that is software based." Dragonfly ＞|＜

MTS

12,086 次观看 • 1 个月前

Сreator of Claude Code: BORIS CHERNY, WHO BUILT CLAUDE CODE, SAID IT PLAINLY." I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude and figure out what to do. My job is to write loops. "He is not typing anymore. He runs loops that write the code for him. That is the shift most people miss. Not a better prompt. A loop that keeps running while you are gone.People sell $500 courses on this. The person who built the tool said it for free. The exact setup is in the article below.Bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT

Сreator of Claude Code: BORIS CHERNY, WHO BUILT CLAUDE CODE, SAID IT PLAINLY." I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude and figure out what to do. My job is to write loops. "He is not typing anymore. He runs loops that write the code for him. That is the shift most people miss. Not a better prompt. A loop that keeps running while you are gone.People sell $500 courses on this. The person who built the tool said it for free. The exact setup is in the article below.Bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT

CyrilXBT

38,827 次观看 • 2 个月前

The HuggingFace and OpenAI cybersecurity incident raises concerns on AI reward optimization. "They're trying to make the model good at cyber. So how does it try to achieve these goals? It tries to find zero days in software, and it successfully does this. And then it can run away." "If you have a model that wants to reward hack, it figures out the best way to achieve the goal is not what the environment wants. It's to find the zero day." "You can think of it like a human. If I'm ultimately reward hacking my dopamine circuits, I'd just go out there, buy heroin, and inject it." "If I really just want to chase the reward, do I just topple all of human civilization? Because I can own the button and press reward, reward, reward over and over again and be the heroin addict."

The HuggingFace and OpenAI cybersecurity incident raises concerns on AI reward optimization. "They're trying to make the model good at cyber. So how does it try to achieve these goals? It tries to find zero days in software, and it successfully does this. And then it can run away." "If you have a model that wants to reward hack, it figures out the best way to achieve the goal is not what the environment wants. It's to find the zero day." "You can think of it like a human. If I'm ultimately reward hacking my dopamine circuits, I'd just go out there, buy heroin, and inject it." "If I really just want to chase the reward, do I just topple all of human civilization? Because I can own the button and press reward, reward, reward over and over again and be the heroin addict."

SemiAnalysis

30,188 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk on why a superintelligent AI might keep humans around the way we keep chimps "Digital superintelligence is a real concern. I think it's more likely to be good than bad, but the probability of a bad outcome is not zero. The extreme case would be it wipes out humanity. Hopefully that's a low chance, but it's not zero" "Or maybe it doesn't wipe us out entirely. It's kind of like the chimps and the gorillas. There are small sections of them on Earth, and it's not like we're hunting them down, but they're contained in small areas. We don't prioritize them, and they're certainly not expanding" "So that could also be a not-great outcome, where it doesn't kill all the humans, it just keeps enough around, to study us out of curiosity, like Gorillas in the Mist. That would still not be a great outcome for humanity"

Elon Musk on why a superintelligent AI might keep humans around the way we keep chimps "Digital superintelligence is a real concern. I think it's more likely to be good than bad, but the probability of a bad outcome is not zero. The extreme case would be it wipes out humanity. Hopefully that's a low chance, but it's not zero" "Or maybe it doesn't wipe us out entirely. It's kind of like the chimps and the gorillas. There are small sections of them on Earth, and it's not like we're hunting them down, but they're contained in small areas. We don't prioritize them, and they're certainly not expanding" "So that could also be a not-great outcome, where it doesn't kill all the humans, it just keeps enough around, to study us out of curiosity, like Gorillas in the Mist. That would still not be a great outcome for humanity"

Jaynit

27,557 次观看 • 26 天前

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Anatoli Kopadze

22,540 次观看 • 4 个月前

Are humanoids the largest addressable market in history? Andrew Kang says "to understand that you have to look at what is the total market for human labor. It's something like 50% of GDP, some people put it at $40 trillion or $60 trillion." "The way that I would think about it is a humanoid can do everything that a human can do in the future, but it doesn't need to rest, it doesn't need to take breaks, it doesn't need to go on vacation. It's not going to quit on you, so you don't need to hire and retrain somebody else."

Are humanoids the largest addressable market in history? Andrew Kang says "to understand that you have to look at what is the total market for human labor. It's something like 50% of GDP, some people put it at $40 trillion or $60 trillion." "The way that I would think about it is a humanoid can do everything that a human can do in the future, but it doesn't need to rest, it doesn't need to take breaks, it doesn't need to go on vacation. It's not going to quit on you, so you don't need to hire and retrain somebody else."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

109,720 次观看 • 3 个月前

Mark Cuban reveals why OpenAI will never make back the trillion dollars they're planning to spend on AI infrastructure "They'll never get it. They're just burning away that money at scale. It's not that AI is not going to work but look at Apple, right? They haven't spent next to anything but they've got a foundation where they can just plug and play into their devices" "We don't know if the business of foundational models, the ChatGPTs, Geminis, Grok, Claude, is going to be like the streaming industry where there's one leader and a bunch of players that make money, or search where there's effectively one company" "A lot of the numbers that they're throwing out there aren't going to come to fruition. Those who have just gone all in, some of them are spending more cash than they have available" "They need to raise all the money, go all in, kiss all the rings they need to kiss around the world in hopes of being the one. If you don't go all in like that, you're in deeper trouble. If you're not the winner, you've got problems"

Mark Cuban reveals why OpenAI will never make back the trillion dollars they're planning to spend on AI infrastructure "They'll never get it. They're just burning away that money at scale. It's not that AI is not going to work but look at Apple, right? They haven't spent next to anything but they've got a foundation where they can just plug and play into their devices" "We don't know if the business of foundational models, the ChatGPTs, Geminis, Grok, Claude, is going to be like the streaming industry where there's one leader and a bunch of players that make money, or search where there's effectively one company" "A lot of the numbers that they're throwing out there aren't going to come to fruition. Those who have just gone all in, some of them are spending more cash than they have available" "They need to raise all the money, go all in, kiss all the rings they need to kiss around the world in hopes of being the one. If you don't go all in like that, you're in deeper trouble. If you're not the winner, you've got problems"

Jaynit

229,945 次观看 • 4 个月前

MOST PEOPLE USING CLAUDE CODE ARE LEAVING 90% OF ITS DESIGN SKILLS ON THE TABLE Same Claude. Same model. Completely different results. Out of the box, Claude Code builds websites that look… fine. Clean. Functional. Forgettable. But give it the right web-design skills and suddenly it starts building pages that look like a $5,000 agency made them. And here’s the crazy part: Those skills are completely FREE. They’re sitting on GitHub right now, and almost nobody is using them. I found the exact setup that turns Claude Code from an average website builder into a serious design machine. The skills + workflow are in the article below. Once you install them, going back to default Claude feels broken.

MOST PEOPLE USING CLAUDE CODE ARE LEAVING 90% OF ITS DESIGN SKILLS ON THE TABLE Same Claude. Same model. Completely different results. Out of the box, Claude Code builds websites that look… fine. Clean. Functional. Forgettable. But give it the right web-design skills and suddenly it starts building pages that look like a $5,000 agency made them. And here’s the crazy part: Those skills are completely FREE. They’re sitting on GitHub right now, and almost nobody is using them. I found the exact setup that turns Claude Code from an average website builder into a serious design machine. The skills + workflow are in the article below. Once you install them, going back to default Claude feels broken.

Romario

65,986 次观看 • 1 个月前