Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Had some fun with this pissy boy today! More below! ⬇️⬇️ #diaperboy #diaperkink #fetish #humiliation #diaperhumiliation #kink #diaperfetish #gaysex #abdl #tbdl #anal #analsex #diapersex #ageplay #watersports #furry #babyfur
52,878 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
0 Yorum
Yorum bulunmuyor
Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek
![[RG911Team] Why did the NYC mayor admit to covering up 9/11? Ground Zero was a crime scene, but he had 120 dump trucks haul away debris THE SAME DAY to be put on barges. This violates CSI rules. Rudy W. Giuliani has some explaining to do. And on 9/10/26, we’re coming to NYC for answers. See comment below ⬇️ But we should also ask: how were these dump trucks, construction equipment and drivers so readily available on such short notice to carry out this unlawful operation? Note that this is not how a rescue operation is conducted for a major building collapse. When the goal is to save lives trapped in the rubble, it is a slow, methodical process, including: Surface sweep: Rescuers search the outer layers and call out for lightly trapped victims. Technical tools: Teams deploy acoustic listening devices, thermal cameras, sniffer dogs, and tiny pole-mounted video cameras to scan deep interior voids. Signaling: Searchers use carbon dioxide detectors to find hidden breathing signatures of unconscious people. Cribbing and shoring: Workers stabilize heavy concrete slabs using wooden blocks, hydraulic jacks, and structural shoring before crawling underneath. Breaching and cutting: Rescuers use concrete saws, jackhammers, and drills to carve narrow tunnels through heavy floors. Trenching by hand: Debris is cleared manually bucket-by-bucket rather than with heavy machines to avoid shifting the rubble onto survivors. So, the arrival and use of dozens of heavy-duty dump trucks on day 1 was extremely premature… unless they were not there to help save lives. They were there to destroy evidence. And Rudy allowed it to happen. More below ⬇️](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2082674389162885127/amplify_video_thumb/2082674306321186816/img/NrPMBFlUUipKkQ9r.jpg)
![CLARIFYING THE RECENTLY SPREAD DEFAMATION AGAINST #EXO #SUHO⬇️ [Though the onus of individual literacy(media-wise, contextual, or literal) shouldn’t and doesn’t rest on this page or the person it represents, it’s important to clarify the most recently circulated post defaming SUHO. The manipulated images and videos are part of a continuously growing series of concentrated and increasingly malicious intrafandom attacks aimed against his character, which have increased even more than their usual high rates especially over the past month.] SUHO held his first official VLive livestream on January 12th 2016, titled ‘SUHO’s Heartfelt Message’. The 90 minute live was 100% unscripted, and consisted of a Q&A of random questions sent in through the comments. One question had to do with the Korean concept of ‘띠동갑’, and the Lunar Zodiac Astrology prevalent in East Asian and some Southeast Asian cultures. Though we don’t see what the question was on video, SUHO’s response was likely repeating it back to himself, saying ‘나의 차이 몇 살까지? 띠동갑까지?’ Meaning ‘Up until how old agewise? Til the same zodiac sign?’ 띠동갑 is the concept that people born 12 years apart fall under the same Zodiac sign, and is basically the Korean age hierarchical system with an astrological touch. A western equivalent would be a group of May Gemini versus a group of June Gemini, March vs April Aries, December vs January Capricorn, cusps and so forth. TO REITERATE: This was NOT a question related to dating/romance/sexual interest, but a question about his zodiac sign and Eastern astrological cycles. SUHO, whose Lunar Zodiac belongs to the Year of the Sheep(containing the specific years 1919, 1931, 1943, 1955, 1967, 1979, 1991, 2003, 2015, 2027, 2039, 2051, and so on in 12 year increments) replied: -‘위아래로 띠동갑까지 제가’ (Ddidongkap is 1 cycle above and 1 cycle below me.’ -‘스물여섯이니까’ (Since I’m 26…) does the math and says: -‘스물여섯이니까 12배면 14 열네 살에서 서른여덟 살까지’ (Since I’m 26, and [띠동갑] is cycles of 12, that means [for 1991 Sheep] it’s 14 to 38 years old.’ Which simply and clearly states that the direct 띠동갑 for his lunar sign of the sheep are 14(2003), and 38(1979), which are equally 12 years above and below him. ADDRESSING THE MAIN ISSUE OF INTENTIONAL MANIPULATION BY SAID COMMENT⬇️ After calculating+confirming the 띠동갑 for his zodiac sign, SUHO says ‘감당하겠습니다’ (I’m fine with/accept that). Which also DOES NOT IMPLY ANYTHING ROMANTICALLY/SEXUALLY. His realization at the age range of his zodiac cycle is apparent, but 띠동갑 is not related to romance. The main market for idols range from tweens to young adults, and the invasiveness of the industry garners parasocial interest often misconstrued as potential for romantic reciprocity in their impressionable, young minds. Reading the comments, it appeared that in revealing that info, some of the fans got the wrong idea. SUHO stutters, ‘예— 어— 민-‘(Yeah, uh, awkward[민망=awkward]), then says ‘그니까’(That’s…) -‘그 미성년자이신분들은…’ (About the minors [that are asking in the chat]..) -‘뭘 철컹철컹’ (What’s that clanking handcuffs sound?) It’s clear in his expression that he was made uncomfortable by what likely were minors clamoring for their idol, thinking they had a chance with him over an innocuous response to a question about zodiac cycles. SUHO then firmly reiterates: ‘성인이 되신 다음에 저를 찾아오세요’ (Find me AFTER you become an adult.) He remains adamant in his statement though it appears the comments were still highly invested in the subject. Politely irritated, he responds to the comments, saying ‘아님 철컹 철— 뭐 뭐야’ (No, handcuffs handc— What? What? What?) Then SUHO reads out loud another comment that says ‘그것이 알고싶다고’ (I want to know about that) And SUHO firmly replies ‘그것이 알고싶지 않다니까‘ (I DON’T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THAT) After that exchange, SUHO abruptly shifts the conversation to a less discomfiting topic.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1812415294255542707/amplify_video_thumb/1812415162558676992/img/J68tQqDb9emXZ5OE.jpg)
![👽 Dr. Eric Davis: I Saw Photos of a Dead Gray Alien 👽 🇷🇺 🔥 It Appears the Soviets Retrieved a Tic Tac UFO and Four Deceased Grays 🔥 🇷🇺 "[The Soviets] did recover four bodies of humanoid aliens." ~Davis Josh Golembeske (Josh Golembeske): "In the movie 'Moment of Contact,' directed by James Fox, 'New Revelations of Alien Encounters,' you made an incredible statement. You swore on your own life and your kids' life that you saw photos and reports of crash retrievals and non-human intelligent bodies." (Watch that clip of Dr. Davis...here. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ) ~ Josh Golembeske (Josh): "That's an incredible statement - that you saw in a SCIF. Then a year earlier, you in 2025, at the UAP-Disclosure-Fund briefing to Congress, mentioned four types of ET races. You said that you know they are Nordics, Grays, Insectoids, and Reptilians." ~ (Here's an edited transcript of that exchange.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "Can you comment on whatever species have been piloting these craft? Davis: "They're typically the multiple species people are familiar with. The Greys, the Nordics. A humanoid, because they have...a hand, and four limbs, and a torso, so..." Burlison: "Large? Small?" Davis: "Human size, human scale." Burlison: "How many are in a crew?" Davis: "Well, the group, well, the Greys I'm familiar with from investigating the crash at Corona, which is misnamed the crash at Roswell. It's not the crash at Roswell, it's the crash at Corona, New Mexico. Those were Greys, those were four-foot tall. And the Nordics are typically human-sized, probably...I've heard five, six-feet tall. And same with the people who mislabel Reptilian and Insectoid. They're roughly that height, too. I haven't heard anything about anything seven or eight feet or nine-foot tall, of that nature." Full transcript here: ~~~ Josh: "And you mentioned that you know the public has low credibility evidence on that, and then the classified programs is high credible evidence potentially of this." (Watch that clip here. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ) ~ Josh: "My question for you is...and I'm not trying to push you to break your NDAs here, but I know you can't say much. But in those photos and reports, were those species involved in those photos and reports that you saw?" Dr. Eric Davis: "Just one of them. And there's a minimum of four, and that was my slip up for not clarifying that. There's a minimum of four. The best example of the number of, you know, I don't know if you would say species versus morphology. You have to look at Bob Emenegger's companion book to his 1974 television documentary, 'UFOs: Past, Present, and Future.' "He's got a section in the middle of the book showing graphics of the taxonomy of different UAP craft that have been observed and investigated by Project Blue Book. And then there's one with the taxonomy of 'NHIs' or 'aliens.' And that section on the taxonomy of the different NHIs/aliens or ufonauts, as Jacques Vallée calls 'em, is an excellent example of the variety of different type of UAP beings or crew members that have been reported and investigated and encountered. "So there's a minimum of four. And as I qualified at the May 1st, 2025 House Oversight Committee, I clarified that the Reptilians and Insectoids are not a species, per [say]. Well, they are. It's just that they morphologically resemble what they're [we're] familiar with on Earth." (I would push back and say that we don't know if they're multiple species. Hell, they could be avatars created by a single, ultra-advanced intelligence that uses a type of super-duper 3D printing to make/create four different types of beings, infused with AI. In other words, robots. Or, maybe they're four different types of ETs from four different planets? We just don't know. And yes, witnesses have reported seeing lots of different craft and beings, which Dr. James Lacatski has pointed out. Could be a clue. I'll try to find and post the Emenegger taxonomies in the replies, in the morning.) Davis: "So, for example, the Insectoid is going to represent a type of NHI species that resembles or looks like, you know, it's got the face and body morphology of an insect..." Josh: "A praying mantis." Davis: "...or a praying mantis, yeah. But that's not what they are. They're not a praying mantis, by any means. They're not an insect by any means. It's just that that's how they appear. And so, the same with the Reptilian. It doesn't mean that they're reptiles, it just means that they resemble an Earth-type reptile." (How does he know that they're not actual intelligent praying mantises or reptiles or something similar? What is he basing that on?) Davis: "Remember these things, we don't know that they even come from Earth. But that doesn't mean that's exactly what they are. I'm not aware (laughs) that we've got any deceased ones. I'm aware that we've recovered deceased Grays. And the Grays are like the little ones you saw near the end of, 'Close Encounters of Third Kind.' The little guys, diminutive bodies and really large heads." Josh: "Is that the one you saw in the photos, the Grays?" Davis: "Yeah. Yeah." (Great question, and that's new information. I thought he may have seen Reptilian or Mantis bodies but a few other folks thought he was talking about Grays. You were right.) Josh: "Oh, okay, that's fascinating. Okay. And I don't know how much information you can give about these photos. Was it some of the famous crash sites that we've heard about over the years? Is it Roswell, is it Kecksburg?" Davis: "Ah no, this was foreign intelligence collected so this is a foreign crash, and that's classified, so I can't get into that. But the photos I saw came from the site of a foreign crash retrieval during the Cold War." (if you look up the end of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the U.S., it will tell you that it ended in December of 1991 when the Soviet Union dissolved and ceased to exist. That date and timeframe will be important in a second.) Josh: "Got it. And like, how does that work, exactly, Dr. Davis? Because you're such a highly-credible person. And for you to say I saw photos of crash retrievals and ET bodies, is disclosure on some level to me and to some people. But you can't cross the line to saying more. Like, how does that work from a national-security situation? Like, who draws that line, you know?" Davis: "Well, this isn't a disclosure of American information. It's involving intelligence collection on a foreign adversary. So...you have to kind of walk a fine line here. That's all you can do. Now, whether the government agency that owns that intelligence is willing to disclose it? It's hard to say because there's a lot of sources and methods that are buried inside that intelligence, and that makes it very hard for them to want to reveal because the sources and methods are still being used today." (Okay. So which country was it, and when did the crash take place? And what type of craft? Let's go back to Davis in, "The Age of Disclosure.") Dr. Eric Davis: "We have seen highly-credible, U.S. government intelligence on the Soviet recovery of a crashed UAP in 1989." (Two years before the end of the Cold War with the Soviets, so the timeframe fits.) Davis: "They recovered a Tic Tac-shaped UAP that was twice as big as the Tic Tac that was encountered by the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, and they did recover four bodies of humanoid aliens. The Soviet scientists took apart the recovered craft and discovered a very advanced directed energy weapon." (It certainly looks like this case fits what Davis said to Josh. Davis also said this in 2024 at the SOL conference.) Dr. Eric Davis: "Russia is one that had some crash retrievals, and that's been released when the Soviet Union fell, KGB opened up the files, George Knapp went there, other people went there, found the Thread 3 documents. And I had independent - and I can't get into this because it's still super classified - but through the AAWSAP program, I had a connection in with a three-letter agency that collected, not from the KGB open records, they collected it from their own asset. "And the asset was filtering out actual, legitimate documents, photos, reports, technical and operational and executive-summary type. " (Photos of four Grays? Again, this seems to fit with what he was talking about to James Fox, Josh, and elsewhere.) Davis: "There is enough evidence that I saw in a classified setting that convinced me that they have it. At least one crash retrieval, yeah. I can't say that and go back to the 40s, 50s or 60s or 70s. I know...it was at the end of the 80s was the one I was exposed to. So, they have had something and they've got hardware, but I don't see that they've been any successful with it."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2080949500215230603/amplify_video_thumb/2080949295340216320/img/e7unBP7eaIs1zY89.jpg)
