Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

haiku 5.5 vs deepseek v4.1 flash tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > haiku took 90 mins and cost $3.4 via claude code > v4.1 flash took 50 mins and cost $0.67 via aihubmix api haiku failed to make the game on the first try... show more

J A Z I I

11,489 subscribers

22,012 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,643 views • 2 months ago

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

148,417 views • 1 month ago

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

24,968 views • 1 month ago

deepseek v4 pro is basically free right now 😳 teamorouter is offering deepseek v4 pro at almost no cost you can also use deepseek v4 flash for free what you get: - deepseek v4 pro free - deepseek v4 flash free - 1M context - openai compatible api - no subscription - credits never expire why this is worth checking: > v4 pro is currently listed at $0 input and output > flash is also available at $0 > works with claude code, codex and other tools > one api gives you access to multiple models getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. open the dashboard 4. create your api key base url: 5. add it to your ai coding tool 6. select deepseek-v4-pro-free worth testing while it’s available

deepseek v4 pro is basically free right now 😳 teamorouter is offering deepseek v4 pro at almost no cost you can also use deepseek v4 flash for free what you get: - deepseek v4 pro free - deepseek v4 flash free - 1M context - openai compatible api - no subscription - credits never expire why this is worth checking: > v4 pro is currently listed at $0 input and output > flash is also available at $0 > works with claude code, codex and other tools > one api gives you access to multiple models getting started: 1. go to 2. create your account 3. open the dashboard 4. create your api key base url: 5. add it to your ai coding tool 6. select deepseek-v4-pro-free worth testing while it’s available

K2S

40,282 views • 1 month ago

one of my favorite ways to use claude code skills right now - combining remotion with claude-in-chrome for motion video creation. the workflow is addictive. the clip you see here was produced with minimal prompting effort let me know if you would like me to write a full break down of this process. you describe to claude code what you want, claude code writes the remotion components, opens the remotion studio (via browser) with claude-in-chrome, sees the actual rendered output, and iterates on it in real time. need the arrows pointing to the center of the bubbles instead of the edge? just say it. need the layout shifted to the center? say it. claude sees the preview, adjusts the code, re-renders. then when you're happy you tell claude code to render the final video. but skills are what make this possible. remotion knowledge + browser automation + the taste to iterate visually. no copy pasting screenshots back and forth. no "can you try moving it 10px to the right" over chat. it just looks and fixes. this is the kind of workflow that makes you realize how much further claude code can go beyond just writing code in a terminal. i didn't touch any code while working on the clip you see if you haven't tried combining skills together like this - start experimenting. the skills combos is where the magic is at.

one of my favorite ways to use claude code skills right now - combining remotion with claude-in-chrome for motion video creation. the workflow is addictive. the clip you see here was produced with minimal prompting effort let me know if you would like me to write a full break down of this process. you describe to claude code what you want, claude code writes the remotion components, opens the remotion studio (via browser) with claude-in-chrome, sees the actual rendered output, and iterates on it in real time. need the arrows pointing to the center of the bubbles instead of the edge? just say it. need the layout shifted to the center? say it. claude sees the preview, adjusts the code, re-renders. then when you're happy you tell claude code to render the final video. but skills are what make this possible. remotion knowledge + browser automation + the taste to iterate visually. no copy pasting screenshots back and forth. no "can you try moving it 10px to the right" over chat. it just looks and fixes. this is the kind of workflow that makes you realize how much further claude code can go beyond just writing code in a terminal. i didn't touch any code while working on the clip you see if you haven't tried combining skills together like this - start experimenting. the skills combos is where the magic is at.

elvis

46,533 views • 8 months ago

My plush octopus got a little too attached to me 😂🐙 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I prefer Opus: fluffier fur and livelier tentacles. Both run right in the browser on WebGPU - no ready-made models or textures, just code, soft-body physics, and fur you can comb Unexpectedly, Opus was cheaper too. Sol usually costs several times less in my tests Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.21 Sol - $18.03 Fluffier and cheaper? Which one would you pick? 👀

My plush octopus got a little too attached to me 😂🐙 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol I prefer Opus: fluffier fur and livelier tentacles. Both run right in the browser on WebGPU - no ready-made models or textures, just code, soft-body physics, and fur you can comb Unexpectedly, Opus was cheaper too. Sol usually costs several times less in my tests Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.21 Sol - $18.03 Fluffier and cheaper? Which one would you pick? 👀

Vib3Coded

137,680 views • 9 days ago

you can run claude code inside antigravity completely Free with zero credit card and no rate limits 😳 use openrouter’s free models + antigravity. no anthropic bill. no paid api keys. takes 10 minutes to set up. what you get during this setup: - full claude code agent experience - strong coding models (including deepseek-r1, qwen2.5-coder, llama-4, grok-4 free tier) - antigravity’s clean workspace and sandbox - unlimited usage (as long as you stay on free models) - easy model swapping - zero cost full setup guide (100% free): step 1: install antigravity -go to and install it -create a new workspace step 2: install claude code - inside antigravity, install the claude code extension from the marketplace - open the built-in terminal step 3: create openrouter free account -go to - sign up with google (no card needed) - go to keys and create a new api key step 4: set the environment variables -in antigravity terminal run: export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-or-xxx export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-xxx step 5: launch claude code with free model -run this command: claude-code --model deepseek/deepseek-r1:free or try: qwen/qwen2.5-coder:free if you already have antigravity? skip straight to step 2. after 10 minutes you’ll have a full agentic coding setup running for free. this is currently one of the cheapest ways to run serious coding agents in 2026. bookmark this before they limit the free models.

you can run claude code inside antigravity completely Free with zero credit card and no rate limits 😳 use openrouter’s free models + antigravity. no anthropic bill. no paid api keys. takes 10 minutes to set up. what you get during this setup: - full claude code agent experience - strong coding models (including deepseek-r1, qwen2.5-coder, llama-4, grok-4 free tier) - antigravity’s clean workspace and sandbox - unlimited usage (as long as you stay on free models) - easy model swapping - zero cost full setup guide (100% free): step 1: install antigravity -go to and install it -create a new workspace step 2: install claude code - inside antigravity, install the claude code extension from the marketplace - open the built-in terminal step 3: create openrouter free account -go to - sign up with google (no card needed) - go to keys and create a new api key step 4: set the environment variables -in antigravity terminal run: export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-or-xxx export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-xxx step 5: launch claude code with free model -run this command: claude-code --model deepseek/deepseek-r1:free or try: qwen/qwen2.5-coder:free if you already have antigravity? skip straight to step 2. after 10 minutes you’ll have a full agentic coding setup running for free. this is currently one of the cheapest ways to run serious coding agents in 2026. bookmark this before they limit the free models.

painn

32,057 views • 4 months ago

You can now use GPT 5.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Kimi K3 and 47 other AI models completely free😱 No subscription. No credit card. Even the API usage costs $0. AIHubMix just opened a free catalog with 50 AI models. Some of the available models: • Ox Alpha • Gemini 3.7 Flash • GLM 5.2 • Kimi K3 • MiniMax M3 • GPT 5.5 • 40+ more And you don’t need separate API keys for each model. Setup takes 2 minutes: > Step 1: Go to > Create an account using your email or OAuth. No card needed. Step 2: Create one API key > The same key works with every free and paid model. Step 3: Add it to any OpenAI-compatible tool Base URL: Then choose any model ending in -free, such as: coding-glm-5.2-free gpt-5.5-free That’s it. One API key. 50 AI models. $0 for both input and output. Save this. You might need a free multi-model setup later.

You can now use GPT 5.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Kimi K3 and 47 other AI models completely free😱 No subscription. No credit card. Even the API usage costs $0. AIHubMix just opened a free catalog with 50 AI models. Some of the available models: • Ox Alpha • Gemini 3.7 Flash • GLM 5.2 • Kimi K3 • MiniMax M3 • GPT 5.5 • 40+ more And you don’t need separate API keys for each model. Setup takes 2 minutes: > Step 1: Go to > Create an account using your email or OAuth. No card needed. Step 2: Create one API key > The same key works with every free and paid model. Step 3: Add it to any OpenAI-compatible tool Base URL: Then choose any model ending in -free, such as: coding-glm-5.2-free gpt-5.5-free That’s it. One API key. 50 AI models. $0 for both input and output. Save this. You might need a free multi-model setup later.

CDG

15,388 views • 1 month ago

The jelly world just turned to piracy 🏴‍☠️🏝 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra - same prompt, two tiny pirate coves Opus wins on the island vibe for me. The bright ripples and giant skull make it look like a pirate hideout straight out of a cartoon With Astra, I prefer the ship itself: the detailed hull, cannons and rigging. It looks like the crew actually came to raid ships, not just take a vacation Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.62 Astra - $11.83 Which cove would you sail into?

The jelly world just turned to piracy 🏴‍☠️🏝 Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra - same prompt, two tiny pirate coves Opus wins on the island vibe for me. The bright ripples and giant skull make it look like a pirate hideout straight out of a cartoon With Astra, I prefer the ship itself: the detailed hull, cannons and rigging. It looks like the crew actually came to raid ships, not just take a vacation Estimated API cost: Opus - $15.62 Astra - $11.83 Which cove would you sail into?

Vib3Coded

22,766 views • 5 days ago

Opus 5.5 + GrokBot + Jev... I can't believe that I build it I packed the best of AI into ONE agent - now 99% of people’s AI agents look dumb, slow, and expensive Try here (free): prompt → GrokBot → Jev chooses LLM → Claude / GPT working on GrokBot's computer 24/7 → result → Jev sends only the tasks Grok is weak at to Opus or GPT → Jev picks the best model for each task - for example, Claude for motion design and Codex for web design → runs on the ChatGPT and Claude subscriptions you already pay for (API also work) → works on GrokBot computer while you keep chatting → checks every result against the goal before you see it → GrokBot gets smarter and cheaper at the same time → And plenty more features in a bot everyone will call "obvious" by 2030 Try Jevopus, thank me later - then read the article on the full Jev architecture ↓

Opus 5.5 + GrokBot + Jev... I can't believe that I build it I packed the best of AI into ONE agent - now 99% of people’s AI agents look dumb, slow, and expensive Try here (free): prompt → GrokBot → Jev chooses LLM → Claude / GPT working on GrokBot's computer 24/7 → result → Jev sends only the tasks Grok is weak at to Opus or GPT → Jev picks the best model for each task - for example, Claude for motion design and Codex for web design → runs on the ChatGPT and Claude subscriptions you already pay for (API also work) → works on GrokBot computer while you keep chatting → checks every result against the goal before you see it → GrokBot gets smarter and cheaper at the same time → And plenty more features in a bot everyone will call "obvious" by 2030 Try Jevopus, thank me later - then read the article on the full Jev architecture ↓

codila

272,469 views • 15 days ago

LISA SU'S AMD AND NVIDIA'S JENSEN HUANG JUST MADE THE $200 CLAUDE CODE PLAN AND THE $200 OPENAI PLAN ALMOST FREE a used $1,200 amd box under my desk paid for itself in 3 months, and sam altman, dario amodei and elon musk haven't seen a dollar from me since. month 1 ............ chatgpt pro, -$200 openai's own gpt-oss-120b runs on lisa's ryzen ai halo at ~30 tokens a second. the same company charging $200 a month for chatgpt pro gave this one away for free, so i cancelled that night month 2 ............ claude max 20x, -$200 claude code now points at qwen3 coder 30b running on the box. it works exactly like before, the model just lives under my desk instead of anthropic's servers month 3 ............ supergrok heavy, -$300 glm 4.5 air took over my long research sessions. the most expensive line on my card was the first one i didn't miss saved by month 3 ........ $1,300 the box ................. $1,200 saved by month 12 ....... $7,600 electricity ............. ~$10/mo jensen's dgx spark runs the exact same stack if you're team nvidia. i just found lisa's cheaper opus 5.5 still writes my hardest code. everything else moved under my desk, and my ai bill went from $700 a month to ~$10 of electricity bookmark this before your next $200 renewal, models in the comments

LISA SU'S AMD AND NVIDIA'S JENSEN HUANG JUST MADE THE $200 CLAUDE CODE PLAN AND THE $200 OPENAI PLAN ALMOST FREE a used $1,200 amd box under my desk paid for itself in 3 months, and sam altman, dario amodei and elon musk haven't seen a dollar from me since. month 1 ............ chatgpt pro, -$200 openai's own gpt-oss-120b runs on lisa's ryzen ai halo at ~30 tokens a second. the same company charging $200 a month for chatgpt pro gave this one away for free, so i cancelled that night month 2 ............ claude max 20x, -$200 claude code now points at qwen3 coder 30b running on the box. it works exactly like before, the model just lives under my desk instead of anthropic's servers month 3 ............ supergrok heavy, -$300 glm 4.5 air took over my long research sessions. the most expensive line on my card was the first one i didn't miss saved by month 3 ........ $1,300 the box ................. $1,200 saved by month 12 ....... $7,600 electricity ............. ~$10/mo jensen's dgx spark runs the exact same stack if you're team nvidia. i just found lisa's cheaper opus 5.5 still writes my hardest code. everything else moved under my desk, and my ai bill went from $700 a month to ~$10 of electricity bookmark this before your next $200 renewal, models in the comments

starmex

11,052 views • 5 days ago

single RTX 3090. 24 GB VRAM. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. 4-bit quant, 113 tokens per second at full 262K context harnessing Claude Code locally with no API, no subscription, no proxy. told it what it is. 30 Mamba2 layers, 10 attention, 256 experts, 8 active per token. said "build something that shows off what you can do." it visualized its own architecture. interactive. tokens flowing through layers. 256 experts lighting up on routing. served in the browser from the same GPU running inference. single prompt. then i said level up. 3D. Three.js. separate files. flythrough camera. clickable layers. it planned first, scaffolded 6 files, hit one API bug, fixed it itself, then optimized for smooth framerate. two iterations to a working 3D neural network explorer. llama.cpp just merged a native Anthropic endpoint. Claude Code points at localhost. the whole setup is two commands. no LiteLLM. no proxy config. the open source models coming out of china right now are genuinely changing what's possible on consumer hardware. respect to the Qwen team. this is acceleration.

single RTX 3090. 24 GB VRAM. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. 4-bit quant, 113 tokens per second at full 262K context harnessing Claude Code locally with no API, no subscription, no proxy. told it what it is. 30 Mamba2 layers, 10 attention, 256 experts, 8 active per token. said "build something that shows off what you can do." it visualized its own architecture. interactive. tokens flowing through layers. 256 experts lighting up on routing. served in the browser from the same GPU running inference. single prompt. then i said level up. 3D. Three.js. separate files. flythrough camera. clickable layers. it planned first, scaffolded 6 files, hit one API bug, fixed it itself, then optimized for smooth framerate. two iterations to a working 3D neural network explorer. llama.cpp just merged a native Anthropic endpoint. Claude Code points at localhost. the whole setup is two commands. no LiteLLM. no proxy config. the open source models coming out of china right now are genuinely changing what's possible on consumer hardware. respect to the Qwen team. this is acceleration.

Sudo su

110,464 views • 7 months ago

found a tool on product hunt that turns claude code into an ad agency.. it’s called Goose Ad Remixer. The setup was surprisingly simple. First, I installed the Gooseworks skill library: npx gooseworks install --all Then I asked Claude Code to generate high-performing ad creatives with: /goose-ads make ads for my brand From there, Goose researched the brand, studied the website, messaging, visual identity, positioning, and existing assets before creating multiple ad concepts. What stood out is that it did not just generate random designs. It studied proven ad patterns, including the hooks, offers, copy, layouts, and creative structures, then remixed them for the brand. It felt less like prompting an image generator and more like giving Claude Code an ad strategist, copywriter, and designer in one workflow. Here are a few of the creatives it generated:

Robin Delta

16,422 views • 3 months ago

THE CHEAPEST LINE ON THIS LIST IS THE ONE THAT SHOULD WORRY PEOPLE. Pulling every ad a competitor is running on Meta now costs your AI $0.002. That used to be somebody's whole afternoon. Now Claude does it in the middle of a chat, then reads what that competitor's customers complain about, then makes your counter-ad. The models could always plan this kind of work. What they were missing was the tools, and a safe way to pay for them. Agentik plugs Claude, ChatGPT, Codex and Cursor into 2,500+ paid tools through one connection, and every call shows its price before it runs. I tested it on Calendly last week. Claude read Reddit and Trustpilot to find the #1 complaint, named a rival brand, made 8 ads and a voiceover, and found the first people to pitch. One tool got stuck halfway and wasn't billed. The whole run came to $0.94. What single jobs cost: → every Meta ad a brand is running: $0.002 → 100 local businesses from Google Maps: $0.002 → a buyer's verified work email: $0.02 → an ad image with clean text: $0.06 → a 5-second product clip: $0.40 The video is the only job on that list over a dime. Eligible new accounts get $5 of free credit that covers every call up to $0.10. The link and a first prompt to try are in the reply

Theinfralab

18,432 views • 1 day ago

50% cheaper Claude inference with just one line of code change! - Remove → model="claude-opus-4-8" - Add → model="ship-like/claude-opus-4-8" I verified the cost saving in my own terminal by invoking the same Anthropic model with the same prompt. The underlying engineering by Ship is actually interesting, and the patterns can be used in any production LLM stack. Essentially, a trained model is a frozen artifact. Every request performs the same forward-pass, whether it extracts a date or refactors a module, because the compute decision was made at training time, before the request existed. Ship makes that decision at inference time instead. After seeing a request, it searches over executions, involving single models, cascades, ensembles, or harnesses with tools, and serves the cheapest one that will match the reference model's quality. This is not a basic router, because picking a cheaper model per query doesn't ensure the cheaper model preserves the original's behavior, like output shape, tool-call patterns, and refusals. Ship measures this equivalence directly. Outputs stay distributionally indistinguishable from the reference model, not token-identical, since two calls to the same model already differ, but they are indistinguishable in capability and behavior. Of course, some requests execute cheaply and some cost Ship more than the customer pays, but the price per request is still a flat 50% off either way, so the execution-cost variance moves off the application's bill entirely. The video below depicts the cost savings and output in my real invocation, and I partnered with the team to put this together.

50% cheaper Claude inference with just one line of code change! - Remove → model="claude-opus-4-8" - Add → model="ship-like/claude-opus-4-8" I verified the cost saving in my own terminal by invoking the same Anthropic model with the same prompt. The underlying engineering by Ship is actually interesting, and the patterns can be used in any production LLM stack. Essentially, a trained model is a frozen artifact. Every request performs the same forward-pass, whether it extracts a date or refactors a module, because the compute decision was made at training time, before the request existed. Ship makes that decision at inference time instead. After seeing a request, it searches over executions, involving single models, cascades, ensembles, or harnesses with tools, and serves the cheapest one that will match the reference model's quality. This is not a basic router, because picking a cheaper model per query doesn't ensure the cheaper model preserves the original's behavior, like output shape, tool-call patterns, and refusals. Ship measures this equivalence directly. Outputs stay distributionally indistinguishable from the reference model, not token-identical, since two calls to the same model already differ, but they are indistinguishable in capability and behavior. Of course, some requests execute cheaply and some cost Ship more than the customer pays, but the price per request is still a flat 50% off either way, so the execution-cost variance moves off the application's bill entirely. The video below depicts the cost savings and output in my real invocation, and I partnered with the team to put this together.

Akshay 🚀

64,482 views • 2 months ago

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Claude Code tip: if Opus 5.5 is already your main model, Fable 5.1 has been sitting idle this whole time. wire it in with /advisor start it with /advisor fable Opus 5.5 writes every line. Fable 5.1 reads the whole session, every tool call, and says nothing until one of three moments: → a plan gets proposed: is this actually the right move, or just the first one? → the same error comes back twice: is the search stuck, or is this a dead end? → the task gets marked done: what got missed while it was moving fast? Opus 5.5 ships. Fable 5.1 catches what would've shipped broken. Jev engineering makes the same move one layer down: forks that don't need a real thinker, which file, which tool, retry or give up, get routed to Jev and answered in under half a second. the expensive model only ever sees the forks that genuinely split. the tree this runs on: > Opus 5.5, high effort, owns the main session > explorer, medium effort, reads the code > worker, medium effort, edits and runs tests > researcher, medium effort, pulls the docs > Fable 5.1 outside all of it, on call, never writing a line itself drop the tree and this prompt into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Look in ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already cover explorer, worker and researcher. Draft new ones only for roles that are missing. Set each to model: opus, effort: medium. If an existing subagent is pinned to a different model, list it, don't touch it. 2. Set the main session's effortLevel to high in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable. 3. Check for anything disabling the advisor: CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, any variable blocking feature-flag fetches, and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report what you find. Change nothing yet. 4. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Don't touch anything until I say go."

Ryven

35,757 views • 12 days ago

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD TURN A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE INTO A ONE-SESSION, $12 BUILD. HERE'S EXACTLY HOW. a studio runs this across four people and three weeks. you run it across one chat window and one afternoon. THE BUILD, STAGE BY STAGE: STAGE 1 - THE CONCEPT Claude reads your brief and scripts the scroll before a line of code exists - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. prompt: "read this brief. script the scroll beat by beat, then scaffold the project with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." STAGE 2 - THE VISUALS (Higgsfield) every hero shot, transition, and ambient loop comes out of 30+ generative models - matched to the story, not pulled from a stock library. prompt: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res, cinematic." STAGE 3 - THE MOTION (Claude Code) Claude writes the ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. zero hand-coded keyframes. prompt: "wire the scroll: pin the hero, scrub the video, reveal each section on scroll. keep it 60fps on mobile." STAGE 4 - THE POLISH six cinematic effects baked in, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. prompt: "bake in the cinematic layer, then QA load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - rewrite what doesn't." CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the pipeline was the moat. it just became four prompts. Follow me, comment "MATH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD TURN A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE INTO A ONE-SESSION, $12 BUILD. HERE'S EXACTLY HOW. a studio runs this across four people and three weeks. you run it across one chat window and one afternoon. THE BUILD, STAGE BY STAGE: STAGE 1 - THE CONCEPT Claude reads your brief and scripts the scroll before a line of code exists - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. prompt: "read this brief. script the scroll beat by beat, then scaffold the project with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." STAGE 2 - THE VISUALS (Higgsfield) every hero shot, transition, and ambient loop comes out of 30+ generative models - matched to the story, not pulled from a stock library. prompt: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res, cinematic." STAGE 3 - THE MOTION (Claude Code) Claude writes the ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. zero hand-coded keyframes. prompt: "wire the scroll: pin the hero, scrub the video, reveal each section on scroll. keep it 60fps on mobile." STAGE 4 - THE POLISH six cinematic effects baked in, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. prompt: "bake in the cinematic layer, then QA load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - rewrite what doesn't." CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the pipeline was the moat. it just became four prompts. Follow me, comment "MATH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

47,174 views • 3 months ago

19 year old Japanese student built a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days. Used his iPad as a second monitor. First night: $6,732 profit. Starting capital: $68. Total profit so far: $750,000. [ 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐞 Monica 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐌] Here's how it works👇 The bot scans over 50 markets simultaneously. Syncs live BTC data from Binance every second. Spots price errors before humans even notice. The edge is pure speed + pattern recognition. While traders stare at charts trying to predict the next move, his bot is already executing on mispricing across dozens of markets. No guessing. No emotions. No hesitation. Just Claude Code logic finding gaps that close in seconds. He built the entire system in 48 hours: → Claude Code handles the trading logic → Binance API feeds real-time BTC data → iPad displays multi-market monitoring → Executes trades when arbitrage windows open The system runs 24/7. Every price dislocation = profit opportunity. Most people are still trading manually, refreshing charts, second-guessing entries. Meanwhile this 19 year old engineering student turned $68 into $750K by letting Claude Code do what humans can't: process 50 markets instantly and execute without fear. Why are people still trading manually? I'm giving away the exact Claude Code setup for free. 24 hours only. To get it 👇 1️⃣ Comment " Claude " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow Monica (so I can send it via DM)

19 year old Japanese student built a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days. Used his iPad as a second monitor. First night: $6,732 profit. Starting capital: $68. Total profit so far: $750,000. [ 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐞 Monica 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐌] Here's how it works👇 The bot scans over 50 markets simultaneously. Syncs live BTC data from Binance every second. Spots price errors before humans even notice. The edge is pure speed + pattern recognition. While traders stare at charts trying to predict the next move, his bot is already executing on mispricing across dozens of markets. No guessing. No emotions. No hesitation. Just Claude Code logic finding gaps that close in seconds. He built the entire system in 48 hours: → Claude Code handles the trading logic → Binance API feeds real-time BTC data → iPad displays multi-market monitoring → Executes trades when arbitrage windows open The system runs 24/7. Every price dislocation = profit opportunity. Most people are still trading manually, refreshing charts, second-guessing entries. Meanwhile this 19 year old engineering student turned $68 into $750K by letting Claude Code do what humans can't: process 50 markets instantly and execute without fear. Why are people still trading manually? I'm giving away the exact Claude Code setup for free. 24 hours only. To get it 👇 1️⃣ Comment " Claude " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow Monica (so I can send it via DM)

Monica

33,432 views • 4 days ago

19 year old Japanese student built a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days. Used his iPad as a second monitor. First night: $6,732 profit. Starting capital: $68. Total profit so far: $750,000. [ 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐞 Polash Khan 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐌] Here's how it works👇 The bot scans over 50 markets simultaneously. Syncs live BTC data from Binance every second. Spots price errors before humans even notice. The edge is pure speed + pattern recognition. While traders stare at charts trying to predict the next move, his bot is already executing on mispricing across dozens of markets. No guessing. No emotions. No hesitation. Just Claude Code logic finding gaps that close in seconds. He built the entire system in 48 hours: → Claude Code handles the trading logic → Binance API feeds real-time BTC data → iPad displays multi-market monitoring → Executes trades when arbitrage windows open The system runs 24/7. Every price dislocation = profit opportunity. Most people are still trading manually, refreshing charts, second-guessing entries. Meanwhile this 19 year old engineering student turned $68 into $750K by letting Claude Code do what humans can't: process 50 markets instantly and execute without fear. Why are people still trading manually? I'm giving away the exact Claude Code setup for free. 24 hours only. To get it 👇 1️⃣ Comment " Claude " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow Polash Khan (so I can send it via DM)

19 year old Japanese student built a trading bot with Claude Code in 2 days. Used his iPad as a second monitor. First night: $6,732 profit. Starting capital: $68. Total profit so far: $750,000. [ 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐞 Polash Khan 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐌] Here's how it works👇 The bot scans over 50 markets simultaneously. Syncs live BTC data from Binance every second. Spots price errors before humans even notice. The edge is pure speed + pattern recognition. While traders stare at charts trying to predict the next move, his bot is already executing on mispricing across dozens of markets. No guessing. No emotions. No hesitation. Just Claude Code logic finding gaps that close in seconds. He built the entire system in 48 hours: → Claude Code handles the trading logic → Binance API feeds real-time BTC data → iPad displays multi-market monitoring → Executes trades when arbitrage windows open The system runs 24/7. Every price dislocation = profit opportunity. Most people are still trading manually, refreshing charts, second-guessing entries. Meanwhile this 19 year old engineering student turned $68 into $750K by letting Claude Code do what humans can't: process 50 markets instantly and execute without fear. Why are people still trading manually? I'm giving away the exact Claude Code setup for free. 24 hours only. To get it 👇 1️⃣ Comment " Claude " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow Polash Khan (so I can send it via DM)

Polash Khan

139,217 views • 7 days ago

I just built a skill that lets Claude Code watch & analyze ANY video 🤯 Drop in any video file — UGC ads, competitor Meta ads, organic TikToks, screen recordings — and Claude hands you back a full creative teardown. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for media buyers and creative strategists who reverse-engineer competitor ads every week — and lose half a day doing it by hand. If your creative process starts with studying what's already working, you're scrubbing through competitor ads frame by frame, pausing to write down every hook, screenshotting the on-screen text, and by the tenth video you can't remember what made the first one land... This skill solves it: → Drop any video file into Claude Code → Skill routes it through the Gemini API for native video understanding → Returns a full creative teardown — hook breakdown, target audience, angle, beat-by-beat, on-screen text verbatim → Surfaces the steal-worthy patterns you can apply to your own creative → Same skill works on UGC ads, produced video ads, organic TikToks, and Loom recordings No manual scrubbing. No pausing every 5 seconds. No $200/mo ad intelligence platform. What you get: → Native video understanding via Gemini (not just transcripts) → Structured analysis — hook, angle, audience, pain point, CTA → Verbatim on-screen text and dialogue with timestamps → Hook variations generated directly from competitor ads → About 27 cents per 30-minute video Built 100% in Claude Code with the Gemini API. I recorded a full breakdown showing exactly how I built this, and I'm giving away the skill for free. Want the skill? > Like this post > Comment "CLAUDE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

I just built a skill that lets Claude Code watch & analyze ANY video 🤯 Drop in any video file — UGC ads, competitor Meta ads, organic TikToks, screen recordings — and Claude hands you back a full creative teardown. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for media buyers and creative strategists who reverse-engineer competitor ads every week — and lose half a day doing it by hand. If your creative process starts with studying what's already working, you're scrubbing through competitor ads frame by frame, pausing to write down every hook, screenshotting the on-screen text, and by the tenth video you can't remember what made the first one land... This skill solves it: → Drop any video file into Claude Code → Skill routes it through the Gemini API for native video understanding → Returns a full creative teardown — hook breakdown, target audience, angle, beat-by-beat, on-screen text verbatim → Surfaces the steal-worthy patterns you can apply to your own creative → Same skill works on UGC ads, produced video ads, organic TikToks, and Loom recordings No manual scrubbing. No pausing every 5 seconds. No $200/mo ad intelligence platform. What you get: → Native video understanding via Gemini (not just transcripts) → Structured analysis — hook, angle, audience, pain point, CTA → Verbatim on-screen text and dialogue with timestamps → Hook variations generated directly from competitor ads → About 27 cents per 30-minute video Built 100% in Claude Code with the Gemini API. I recorded a full breakdown showing exactly how I built this, and I'm giving away the skill for free. Want the skill? > Like this post > Comment "CLAUDE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

42,204 views • 3 months ago