Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Hamas leader Khaled Mashal: “We do not accept the two state solution.” — January 22, 2024 “I would like to say two things about the two-state solution. First, we have nothing to do with the two-state solution. We reject this notion, because it means you would get a promise...

96,479 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

6 Yorum

Dr. Fundji Benedict profil fotoğrafı
Dr. Fundji Benedict2 yıl önce

And this is one of the reasons the PA fails at obtaining statehood because one of the criteria is about conducting diplomatic relationships with neighbors…if you do not recognise the legitimacy of one of your neighbors, you do not qualify.

Scottrhawk profil fotoğrafı
Scottrhawk2 yıl önce

This raises once again the question: why is the Biden administration committed both to the “two-state” solution AND to kerping around an outfit that is dedicated to destroying any two-state solution? And why should Israel commit to a two-state solution when there is no partner for such a solution. Netanyahu is criticized for being skeptical of a two-state solution, but if you take Palestinian statements seriously, is he wrong to be skeptical?

Cherlynrn 🇺🇸🇮🇱🎗️ profil fotoğrafı
Cherlynrn 🇺🇸🇮🇱🎗️2 yıl önce

They are further away than ever.

@bagioandb profil fotoğrafı
@bagioandb2 yıl önce

This is so sick and what’s even sicker are the people that refuse to see the truth, the hate, the desire to rid the world of Jews and Israel and the fact that they are next on the list for annihilation.

Toto profil fotoğrafı
Toto2 yıl önce

I am flabbergasted

RC 奇跡 profil fotoğrafı
RC 奇跡2 yıl önce

I added your post to my thread:

Benzer Videolar

"Ongoing" - One of the phrases increasingly used next to the term "Nakba" is "Ongoing" as in the recent proposal by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. Now westerners assume that the "ongoing" seeks to highlight continued suffering of Palestinian Arabs, but as with so many other phrases that serve as "dual use language" (as Eran Shayshon coined) is that the deep meaning is very different. Once it is known and understood that the real time meaning of the Nakba, as described by Constantin Zureiq as "Seven Arab states declare war in an attempt to subdue Zionism, stop impotent before it, and return on their heels" was the shameful failure to defeat the lowly Jews in war - it becomes crystal clear why it remains "ongoing": As long as Israel exists, the Arab, and especially Palestinian Arab shameful failure to dismantle Jewish sovereignty and "subdue Zionism" remains "ongoing". As long as, per Bevin's quote, the top goal of the Palestine Arabs "to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of the land" remains unfulfilled, their definition of disaster remains "ongoing". In the updated book of The War of Return, "October Return", Dr. Adi Schwartz and I included a dictionary of sort to explore this dual use language. I share it here with you: "This becomes especially clear when analyzing the language of Palestinian identity and that of its supporters around the world. Terms such as “two states,” “justice,” “return,” and “rights” carry one meaning in dialogue between Palestinians and Westerners or Israelis—but an entirely different meaning within internal Palestinian discourse. "Take “two states,” for example. During the years of negotiations, Palestinian leaders—and many surveys—expressed support for the “two-state solution.” Israelis and Westerners reasonably assumed that this meant one state for Palestinian Arabs and one for Jews. In retrospect, we should have checked. For when Palestinians speak of “two states,” they also maintain that millions of Palestinian “refugees” have a right to settle inside Israel. The implication is that the phrase “two states” actually means a Palestinian Arab state in the West Bank and Gaza, alongside a second Arab-majority state that replaces Israel via the mass return of refugees. In effect: “this one is ours, and that one is also ours.” "To this day, no official Palestinian peace plan includes the recognition of a Jewish state on any part of the land between the river and the sea. "It is also worth examining the meaning of a word like “justice”—so frequently invoked in phrases like “a just peace,” “a just solution,” or in the names of organizations such as “Students for Justice in Palestine.” To many in the world, “justice” may simply mean that Palestinians should have a state of their own, or that Israel should not control their daily lives. That is a reasonable interpretation. But it is not the Palestinian one. "For Palestinians, there is only one concept of justice: the reversal of the injustice they associate with the creation of the State of Israel. And central to that “corrective justice” is return—which, by definition, entails the end of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. "The same applies to words like “rights,” “liberation,” and, of course, “return.” As will become clear in the pages ahead, there is no ambiguity: “return” is the concept that embodies victory over the Jewish state and its elimination. "That is why the butcherty of October 7 was greeted with euphoria."

ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf

83,490 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce