Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Hank Brennan has lost the plot. He’s wasted 45 minutes asking Dr. Wolfe zero questions about the case, the evidence, or his conclusions. And now he dragged Dr. Wolfe’s wife into it — because Hank Brennan is a morally bankrupt, spineless, little rat coward piece of 🤬🤬🤬. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial

Olivia

28,295 subscribers

77,848 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von PenJustWrites1

PenJustWrites1vor 1 Jahr

Which is why I made this last week.

Profilbild von Ted

Tedvor 1 Jahr

It’s what spineless rats do when cornered. They bite. He’s an all-time piece of shit.

Profilbild von v

vvor 1 Jahr

Their entire case is shifting the burden. Do no science. Have no theory. Attack the responding experts science. Then rebuttal with likely real science.

Profilbild von TLCollins

TLCollinsvor 1 Jahr

The more witnesses he crosses the more his gaslighting and hypocrisy shines through. Hopefully the jury is picking this up. Not to mention the utter disrespect 🤬 & 🫰"over hear"🤦🏼‍♀️

Profilbild von TexasAllianceforLife

TexasAllianceforLifevor 2 Jahren

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

Profilbild von TrueCrimeGal

TrueCrimeGalvor 1 Jahr

Kinda seemed like Bev didn’t like that line of questioning

Profilbild von joseph 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 TRUMP🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

joseph 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 TRUMP🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲vor 1 Jahr

He is just showing more and more what a POS he is.

Profilbild von Hank Hates Science.

Hank Hates Science.vor 1 Jahr

I don't know if you noticed, but after the surprise, his eyes went real dark, real quick. I think Hank just made a serious mistake.

Profilbild von Hey Nikki🚀🌹

Hey Nikki🚀🌹vor 1 Jahr

Daaamn Olivia!!! 🫢🤭 Say it with your whole chest girl! "Don't be shy." PIECE OF SHIT. SHIT!!!!

Profilbild von Stephi King

Stephi Kingvor 1 Jahr

And Bev loves it. They’re both so deep in the framing of KR. It’s so obvious. If no action is taken against these people after trial, whether kr found guilty or not guilty, then we riot lol

Ähnliche Videos

Watch the moment Hank Brennan PLANTED EVIDENCE behind Dr. Daniel Wolfe. Trial by Ambush. Brennan is trash. most corrupt PoS and he blatantly commits prosecutorial misconduct triggering grounds for immediate mistrial. DENIED! #KarenRead #KarenRead2 Law&Crime Network Court TV

Watch the moment Hank Brennan PLANTED EVIDENCE behind Dr. Daniel Wolfe. Trial by Ambush. Brennan is trash. most corrupt PoS and he blatantly commits prosecutorial misconduct triggering grounds for immediate mistrial. DENIED! #KarenRead #KarenRead2 Law&Crime Network Court TV

Rob Van HopFoiá

124,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Just as reminder - As if it weren’t disgusting enough on its own that Hank brought up Dr. Wolfe’s wife in open court, this was on the heels of the April 28 voir dire where Dr. Wolfe explained that his wife and children had been harassed because of comments Hank had made about him in court. He said it was a very difficult time for his family. Hank knew exactly what he was doing and chose to put Dr. Wolfe’s family in danger again, all with the intention of prosecuting a woman that he knows is factually innocent.

Just as reminder - As if it weren’t disgusting enough on its own that Hank brought up Dr. Wolfe’s wife in open court, this was on the heels of the April 28 voir dire where Dr. Wolfe explained that his wife and children had been harassed because of comments Hank had made about him in court. He said it was a very difficult time for his family. Hank knew exactly what he was doing and chose to put Dr. Wolfe’s family in danger again, all with the intention of prosecuting a woman that he knows is factually innocent.

Emily See

93,478 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Just a reminder, this is how Auntie Bev treated David Yannetti seconds into his speech during the voir dire of Dr. Marie Russell. He was immediately reprimanded for using "hyperbole," but Hank Brennan is screaming at Dr. Wolfe and intentionally being the biggest dick possible, and she doesn't have any desire to stop it.

Just a reminder, this is how Auntie Bev treated David Yannetti seconds into his speech during the voir dire of Dr. Marie Russell. He was immediately reprimanded for using "hyperbole," but Hank Brennan is screaming at Dr. Wolfe and intentionally being the biggest dick possible, and she doesn't have any desire to stop it.

Aidan Kearney

112,690 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr Wolfe said there’s a direct correlation between the time of day and pedestrian fatalities. Brennan reads this in court and says “that would have been nice to have”. Here’s Dr Wolfe saying exactly THAT during his direct testimony in the first trial. Then, when Dr Wolfe says a lot of his cases involve pedestrians, Brennan says “pretty important stuff in this case”. Yep. That’s why Dr Wolfe testified to that at trial. Then, Brennan suggests that the defense doesn’t want Dr Wolfe to testify to that, doing his dramatic little “shh, don’t tell them”. Funny, Alan Jackson is the one asking these questions and Dr Wolfe is obviously not hiding anything. Jackson said he talked to the ARCCA and experts about background- for example, his nighttime visibility work and his cases frequently involving pedestrians- and scheduling. Brennan just misrepresented ALL of this, plus told the judge that the defense didn’t turn this over, the feds did- which was not true and he had to correct himself after the judge ended things for the day. If you can’t see what he’s doing yet, you just don’t want to.

Dr Wolfe said there’s a direct correlation between the time of day and pedestrian fatalities. Brennan reads this in court and says “that would have been nice to have”. Here’s Dr Wolfe saying exactly THAT during his direct testimony in the first trial. Then, when Dr Wolfe says a lot of his cases involve pedestrians, Brennan says “pretty important stuff in this case”. Yep. That’s why Dr Wolfe testified to that at trial. Then, Brennan suggests that the defense doesn’t want Dr Wolfe to testify to that, doing his dramatic little “shh, don’t tell them”. Funny, Alan Jackson is the one asking these questions and Dr Wolfe is obviously not hiding anything. Jackson said he talked to the ARCCA and experts about background- for example, his nighttime visibility work and his cases frequently involving pedestrians- and scheduling. Brennan just misrepresented ALL of this, plus told the judge that the defense didn’t turn this over, the feds did- which was not true and he had to correct himself after the judge ended things for the day. If you can’t see what he’s doing yet, you just don’t want to.

Brandi Churchwell

196,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One thing you may have noticed since Hank Brennan has joined this case, is that whenever he speaks, he's very self conscious of being laughed at or heckled by spectators inside the court room. From what I can tell, it's his imagination. #KarenRead

One thing you may have noticed since Hank Brennan has joined this case, is that whenever he speaks, he's very self conscious of being laughed at or heckled by spectators inside the court room. From what I can tell, it's his imagination. #KarenRead

Microdots

54,116 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ASKED. AND. ANSWERED. SIXTEEN TIMES. SIXTEEN is the number of times Hank Brennan badgered the witness—repeating the same question 16 times, despite Dr. Wolfe providing an answer the first time… and every subsequent time. What does the disgrace of a Judge do? She joins in with Brennan, badgering the witness yet another time, because apparently the first fifteen weren’t enough. A competent Judge is supposed to shut down such conduct when it occurs the first time, but most certainly upon the first “asked and answered” objection by opposing counsel. ———— HOW IT WENT DOWN: *This is after a solid 5+ minutes of Hank badgering Dr. Wolfe with this same question.* Alan Jackson: “Objection! This is 5 times your Honor.” Judge Bev: “And this time we’ll get an answer and that’ll be it.” AJ: “We got an answer every single time!” Judge Bev: “Can you answer that Dr. Wolfe?” Dr. Wolfe: “I feel like I’ve answered it the best I can, your Honor.” Judge Bev: “Ok, next question.” Hank Brennan: “You don’t like that question?” AJ: “Objection!” Judge Bev: “Sustained.” AJ: “Move to strike.” Judge Bev: “Strike! Jurors, disregard that!” ———— And this time we’ll get an answer???? Are you serious Judge Cannone? What is wrong with you? Can you imagine if the defense tried pulling this? Oh no—you can’t, because Lifeguard Bev interjects herself and hijacks the defense attorney’s questions, putting a stop to them after the first ask! #DanielWolfe #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

ASKED. AND. ANSWERED. SIXTEEN TIMES. SIXTEEN is the number of times Hank Brennan badgered the witness—repeating the same question 16 times, despite Dr. Wolfe providing an answer the first time… and every subsequent time. What does the disgrace of a Judge do? She joins in with Brennan, badgering the witness yet another time, because apparently the first fifteen weren’t enough. A competent Judge is supposed to shut down such conduct when it occurs the first time, but most certainly upon the first “asked and answered” objection by opposing counsel. ———— HOW IT WENT DOWN: This is after a solid 5+ minutes of Hank badgering Dr. Wolfe with this same question. Alan Jackson: “Objection! This is 5 times your Honor.” Judge Bev: “And this time we’ll get an answer and that’ll be it.” AJ: “We got an answer every single time!” Judge Bev: “Can you answer that Dr. Wolfe?” Dr. Wolfe: “I feel like I’ve answered it the best I can, your Honor.” Judge Bev: “Ok, next question.” Hank Brennan: “You don’t like that question?” AJ: “Objection!” Judge Bev: “Sustained.” AJ: “Move to strike.” Judge Bev: “Strike! Jurors, disregard that!” ———— And this time we’ll get an answer???? Are you serious Judge Cannone? What is wrong with you? Can you imagine if the defense tried pulling this? Oh no—you can’t, because Lifeguard Bev interjects herself and hijacks the defense attorney’s questions, putting a stop to them after the first ask! #DanielWolfe #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

142,457 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

Grant Smith Ellis

14,237 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There it is! Simply brilliant trial strategy from Hank Brennan in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. After the defense submitted copies of Michael Proctor's texts, Brennan has Proctor's friend confirm the State Police fired Proctor for his uncouth language about Karen Read. Brennan strengthened the integrity of his own case and the defense didn't see it coming! Glorious! Watch live with the exclusive Karen Cam, and chat with the towel friends, here -

There it is! Simply brilliant trial strategy from Hank Brennan in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. After the defense submitted copies of Michael Proctor's texts, Brennan has Proctor's friend confirm the State Police fired Proctor for his uncouth language about Karen Read. Brennan strengthened the integrity of his own case and the defense didn't see it coming! Glorious! Watch live with the exclusive Karen Cam, and chat with the towel friends, here -

Grant Smith Ellis

31,005 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hank Brennan retained and hired his unbiased, objective, “no dog in this fight” reconstructionist BEFORE the testing on #KarenRead’s SUV even began or he had the resulting vehicle data from Shanon Burgess. At a November 13, 2024 pretrial hearing (below), Brennan confirmed he’d already hired reconstructionist Judson Welcher. This was during the hearing where the Commonwealth was seeking the court’s permission to allow Shanon Burgess to conduct testing on the Lexus telematics system with the aim of acquiring relevant vehicle data. In other words, the very vehicle data (from Shanon Burgess) that Dr. Judson Welcher claims to have relied upon in forming his conclusions hadn’t even been tested for, let alone acquired or read until months after Welcher had already agreed to do the Commonwealth’s accident reconstruction in exchange for money. Confirmation bias, who dis? #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Hank Brennan retained and hired his unbiased, objective, “no dog in this fight” reconstructionist BEFORE the testing on #KarenRead’s SUV even began or he had the resulting vehicle data from Shanon Burgess. At a November 13, 2024 pretrial hearing (below), Brennan confirmed he’d already hired reconstructionist Judson Welcher. This was during the hearing where the Commonwealth was seeking the court’s permission to allow Shanon Burgess to conduct testing on the Lexus telematics system with the aim of acquiring relevant vehicle data. In other words, the very vehicle data (from Shanon Burgess) that Dr. Judson Welcher claims to have relied upon in forming his conclusions hadn’t even been tested for, let alone acquired or read until months after Welcher had already agreed to do the Commonwealth’s accident reconstruction in exchange for money. Confirmation bias, who dis? #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

30,080 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I watched this now twice. Whether Hank meant to do it or not for the first 24 minutes, Hank knocked Mr. Dan off his pedestal, let the air out of his over inflated ego, and turned a once smug, borderline, arrogant defense lackey, into a much more humble and slightly nervous, Mr. Dan. The final blow to his overinflated sense of self, occured around 23:50. To say Mr. Wolfe was caught off guard when Hank presented him with the screenshot of his wife’s Facebook page, is an understatement. A personal FB account where she very publicly affirmed her membership in one of the “Free Karen Read” Facebook groups. Dan Wolfe lost a bit of color in his face at that moment, and from that point on, appeared like a scared little boy, rather than an obnoxious, and cocky grown man. I’m looking very forward to Monday. Hank was brilliant! #karenread is DUNZO! #JusticeForJohnOkeefe is coming! 💙

I watched this now twice. Whether Hank meant to do it or not for the first 24 minutes, Hank knocked Mr. Dan off his pedestal, let the air out of his over inflated ego, and turned a once smug, borderline, arrogant defense lackey, into a much more humble and slightly nervous, Mr. Dan. The final blow to his overinflated sense of self, occured around 23:50. To say Mr. Wolfe was caught off guard when Hank presented him with the screenshot of his wife’s Facebook page, is an understatement. A personal FB account where she very publicly affirmed her membership in one of the “Free Karen Read” Facebook groups. Dan Wolfe lost a bit of color in his face at that moment, and from that point on, appeared like a scared little boy, rather than an obnoxious, and cocky grown man. I’m looking very forward to Monday. Hank was brilliant! #karenread is DUNZO! #JusticeForJohnOkeefe is coming! 💙

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

22,490 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On a scale of 1 to 10, how dishonest was Hank Brennan in court last week for the Daubert-Lanigan hearing on Dr. Marie Russell’s expertise in dog bites? I got and have been going through the dog bites book, that he so desperately hid behind, so you don’t have to. This book was an interesting choice for Brennan to prop up and rely upon given much of the information contained within is largely supportive of and beneficial to the defense’s case, and conversely—quite damaging to the Commonwealth’s case. In fact, I don’t think it’s possible that Hank Brennan even read through this book, because if he had, he never would’ve used it. In my next few posts, I’ll be comparing passages from the book alongside Hank Brennan’s representations made in court. It’s unclear what Brennan’s intentions are, but if last week’s hearing is any indication, they don’t appear to be honest or interested with the truth. Unfortunate for Mr. Brennan—he likely didn’t foresee that Daubert hearing going longer than an entire day (clearly he hadn’t seen Dr. Russell’s CV yet), and likely didn’t account for the substantial gap in time whereby the defense & Dr. Russell can fact check his claims—something that can’t really be done on the spot—before the next hearing. Apparently he thought he could make things up on the spot as a form of impeachment material, not accounting for the fact that the defense and Dr. Russell now can, and should, confront his blatant misrepresentations and deceptions with the court at the next hearing. Talk about a reverse uno card! Imagine impeaching oneself in the process of desperately attempting to impeach someone else’s credibility? That is the Commonwealth’s case. #KarenReadTrial

On a scale of 1 to 10, how dishonest was Hank Brennan in court last week for the Daubert-Lanigan hearing on Dr. Marie Russell’s expertise in dog bites? I got and have been going through the dog bites book, that he so desperately hid behind, so you don’t have to. This book was an interesting choice for Brennan to prop up and rely upon given much of the information contained within is largely supportive of and beneficial to the defense’s case, and conversely—quite damaging to the Commonwealth’s case. In fact, I don’t think it’s possible that Hank Brennan even read through this book, because if he had, he never would’ve used it. In my next few posts, I’ll be comparing passages from the book alongside Hank Brennan’s representations made in court. It’s unclear what Brennan’s intentions are, but if last week’s hearing is any indication, they don’t appear to be honest or interested with the truth. Unfortunate for Mr. Brennan—he likely didn’t foresee that Daubert hearing going longer than an entire day (clearly he hadn’t seen Dr. Russell’s CV yet), and likely didn’t account for the substantial gap in time whereby the defense & Dr. Russell can fact check his claims—something that can’t really be done on the spot—before the next hearing. Apparently he thought he could make things up on the spot as a form of impeachment material, not accounting for the fact that the defense and Dr. Russell now can, and should, confront his blatant misrepresentations and deceptions with the court at the next hearing. Talk about a reverse uno card! Imagine impeaching oneself in the process of desperately attempting to impeach someone else’s credibility? That is the Commonwealth’s case. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

34,447 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr