Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hank Brennan has lost the plot. He’s wasted 45 minutes asking Dr. Wolfe zero questions about the case, the evidence, or his conclusions. And now he dragged Dr. Wolfe’s wife into it — because Hank Brennan is a morally bankrupt, spineless, little rat coward piece of 🤬🤬🤬. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial

77,848 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля PenJustWrites1
PenJustWrites11 год назад

Which is why I made this last week.

Фото профиля Ted
Ted1 год назад

It’s what spineless rats do when cornered. They bite. He’s an all-time piece of shit.

Фото профиля v
v1 год назад

Their entire case is shifting the burden. Do no science. Have no theory. Attack the responding experts science. Then rebuttal with likely real science.

Фото профиля TLCollins
TLCollins1 год назад

The more witnesses he crosses the more his gaslighting and hypocrisy shines through. Hopefully the jury is picking this up. Not to mention the utter disrespect 🤬 & 🫰"over hear"🤦🏼‍♀️

Фото профиля TexasAllianceforLife
TexasAllianceforLife2 лет назад

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

Фото профиля TrueCrimeGal
TrueCrimeGal1 год назад

Kinda seemed like Bev didn’t like that line of questioning

Фото профиля joseph 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 TRUMP🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
joseph 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 TRUMP🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲1 год назад

He is just showing more and more what a POS he is.

Фото профиля Hank Hates Science.
Hank Hates Science.1 год назад

I don't know if you noticed, but after the surprise, his eyes went real dark, real quick. I think Hank just made a serious mistake.

Фото профиля Hey Nikki🚀🌹
Hey Nikki🚀🌹1 год назад

Daaamn Olivia!!! 🫢🤭 Say it with your whole chest girl! "Don't be shy." PIECE OF SHIT. SHIT!!!!

Фото профиля Stephi King
Stephi King1 год назад

And Bev loves it. They’re both so deep in the framing of KR. It’s so obvious. If no action is taken against these people after trial, whether kr found guilty or not guilty, then we riot lol

Похожие видео

ASKED. AND. ANSWERED. SIXTEEN TIMES. SIXTEEN is the number of times Hank Brennan badgered the witness—repeating the same question 16 times, despite Dr. Wolfe providing an answer the first time… and every subsequent time. What does the disgrace of a Judge do? She joins in with Brennan, badgering the witness yet another time, because apparently the first fifteen weren’t enough. A competent Judge is supposed to shut down such conduct when it occurs the first time, but most certainly upon the first “asked and answered” objection by opposing counsel. ———— HOW IT WENT DOWN: *This is after a solid 5+ minutes of Hank badgering Dr. Wolfe with this same question.* Alan Jackson: “Objection! This is 5 times your Honor.” Judge Bev: “And this time we’ll get an answer and that’ll be it.” AJ: “We got an answer every single time!” Judge Bev: “Can you answer that Dr. Wolfe?” Dr. Wolfe: “I feel like I’ve answered it the best I can, your Honor.” Judge Bev: “Ok, next question.” Hank Brennan: “You don’t like that question?” AJ: “Objection!” Judge Bev: “Sustained.” AJ: “Move to strike.” Judge Bev: “Strike! Jurors, disregard that!” ———— And this time we’ll get an answer???? Are you serious Judge Cannone? What is wrong with you? Can you imagine if the defense tried pulling this? Oh no—you can’t, because Lifeguard Bev interjects herself and hijacks the defense attorney’s questions, putting a stop to them after the first ask! #DanielWolfe #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

142,457 просмотров • 1 год назад

On a scale of 1 to 10, how dishonest was Hank Brennan in court last week for the Daubert-Lanigan hearing on Dr. Marie Russell’s expertise in dog bites? I got and have been going through the dog bites book, that he so desperately hid behind, so you don’t have to. This book was an interesting choice for Brennan to prop up and rely upon given much of the information contained within is largely supportive of and beneficial to the defense’s case, and conversely—quite damaging to the Commonwealth’s case. In fact, I don’t think it’s possible that Hank Brennan even read through this book, because if he had, he never would’ve used it. In my next few posts, I’ll be comparing passages from the book alongside Hank Brennan’s representations made in court. It’s unclear what Brennan’s intentions are, but if last week’s hearing is any indication, they don’t appear to be honest or interested with the truth. Unfortunate for Mr. Brennan—he likely didn’t foresee that Daubert hearing going longer than an entire day (clearly he hadn’t seen Dr. Russell’s CV yet), and likely didn’t account for the substantial gap in time whereby the defense & Dr. Russell can fact check his claims—something that can’t really be done on the spot—before the next hearing. Apparently he thought he could make things up on the spot as a form of impeachment material, not accounting for the fact that the defense and Dr. Russell now can, and should, confront his blatant misrepresentations and deceptions with the court at the next hearing. Talk about a reverse uno card! Imagine impeaching oneself in the process of desperately attempting to impeach someone else’s credibility? That is the Commonwealth’s case. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

34,447 просмотров • 1 год назад