Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐Ÿคฉ Harvey Barron loves an interception - and it's Amir Bourouh who eventually goes over! โšซ๏ธโšช๏ธ Hull FC are hitting back... ๐Ÿ“บ BBC Sport ๐Ÿ† #ChallengeCup

23,550 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

No one will read this: But when one goes through the list of โ€œrace lawsโ€ the IRR talks aboutโ€ฆ you actually get shocked. I went in expecting hardcore stuff like โ€œNo whites allowed in Universityโ€ or โ€œNo whites allowed in Hospitalsโ€ etcโ€ฆ but noo. Itโ€™s the Gambling Act, South African Weather Service Act, Boxing Act, Tourism Act, Broadcasting Act, National Sport and Recreation Act, National Health Laboratory Service Act, Civil Aviation Act, Electronic Communications Act, etc. listed. Here is the website: And theyโ€™re listedโ€ฆ not because they segregate anyone, but simply because they mention the words transformation or redress, some coz they require some racial/sex/disability or even sector-specific representation such as โ€œrequired Faith based leader,โ€ youth representation, community or stakeholder groups, and even professional or sectoral expertise on regulatory boards where some of those groups historically or recently werenโ€™t part of those structures. My personal opinion: โš ๏ธ Yes it is concerning that there are no clear end goalsโ€ฆ no cut-off timelinesโ€ฆ no measurable targets. South Africa hasnโ€™t had a purely merit based system for over 100 years. I donโ€™t think transformation pressures should be a permanent feature of society. There has to be parts of our system where we declare victory and let other systems take over now. And where these pressures donโ€™t always succeed, alternative tools need to be explored. Keeping something say for example BEE forever, even when it isnโ€™t achieving the intended goals, becomes very hard to defend. We need the best of each community competing with the best of other communitiesโ€ฆthatโ€™s the only way to get the ultimate best of our communities running our society. Also: ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ผ-๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ (2025) ๐—”๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† (2022โ€“2024) โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 88โ€“90% functional literacy โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: 90โ€“92% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: 95โ€“97% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~99% ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ (Q3 2025 Estimates) โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 37.9% official / 49.8% expanded โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: 24.1% / 31.2% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: 16.3% / 19.5% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: 7.4% / 9.1% ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—”๐˜๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 12.5% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: 10.1% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~34% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~45% ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ (Age 20โ€“24) โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 26.9% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: 20.3% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: 59.7% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: 59.8% ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ โ€“ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~59โ€“62% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~4โ€“6% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~3โ€“4% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~38โ€“40% ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ โ€“ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~88โ€“90% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~4โ€“5% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~1โ€“2% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~3โ€“4% ๐—๐—ฆ๐—˜-๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ (Total, Direct + Indirect) โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~32โ€“33% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~2โ€“3% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~5โ€“8% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~20โ€“22% (domestic; foreign-held portion separate) ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ โ€“ ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€ & ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—›๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~72% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~15% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~5% โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~4% ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ โ€“ ๐—จ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป / ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~49% โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~30% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~8% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~8% โ€ข (Corporate/Trust/Other: balance โ€” not race-specific) ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: ~9.8% โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~19.6% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: ~41.3% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~71.7% ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜† (2024 Estimates) โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: 71.1 (M) / 77.4 (F) โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: 69.5 / 75.1 โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: 63.8 / 69.5 โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 60.4 / 66.5 ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐— ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ (Risk per 100,000) โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: > 60 โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 35โ€“40 โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: < 10 โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: < 5 ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (Incarceration) โ€ข โšซ๏ธ African: 79% (Locals ~64%) + (foreign nationals ~15%) โ€ข ๐ŸŸ  Coloured: ~18% โ€ข ๐ŸŸค Indian/Asian: < 1% โ€ข โšช๏ธ White: ~2%

๐‘บ๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’Š๐’๐’† ๐‘ด๐’”๐’Š๐’ƒ๐’Š โ“‚

45,041 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten