Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Has 9/11 taught us nothing? Terror suspects at a U.S. bomber base. Out on bail. Trump: “I would have said DON’T LET THEM HAVE BAIL.” We know everything about them. We would NOT have released them.”

36,303 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

25 Comments

Maureen Scott's profile picture
Maureen Scott2 days ago

Clearly not. The U.K. (and I live in U.K.) has surrendered.

Stefan Amos's profile picture
Stefan Amos2 days ago

If I were POTUS I’d say “Pull all equipment and personnel out of the UK Immediately”

"Bratty Child" proudly unapologetic.🇺🇦🇮🇷's profile picture
"Bratty Child" proudly unapologetic.🇺🇦🇮🇷2 days ago

Why DJT still loves the UK Gov. and the King is beyond me. They are a failed Police state (Against their own ppl) that has been invaded, willingly.

FreedomPrincess_AndThePea 🇺🇸's profile picture
FreedomPrincess_AndThePea 🇺🇸2 days ago

If the UK is not going to protect our bases… knowing releases those that attempted to attack… they lets get our troops out of there snd leave UK to their own defense.

Sam Len's profile picture
Sam Len2 days ago

There’s a reason you never hear stories like the suspected terror plot near RAF Fairford, England coming out of Poland.

Sam Len's profile picture
Sam Len2 days ago

When will the UK wake up?

Colt 🇺🇸's profile picture
Colt 🇺🇸2 days ago

The Labor party is just mad that they didn't carry out the attack successfully.

Dr. Sam McGregor 🏌🏻‍♂️🛥🍹☀️🌴🇹🇭 🇺🇸🇨🇦's profile picture
Dr. Sam McGregor 🏌🏻‍♂️🛥🍹☀️🌴🇹🇭 🇺🇸🇨🇦2 days ago

Stupid English. Us Irish know the English are a bunch of F'ing idiots.

SassyDRose's profile picture
SassyDRose2 days ago

UK is paid for

radical son's profile picture
radical son2 days ago

False flag?

Mark's profile picture
Mark2 days ago

Trump's doesn't want to get on their bad side any more than he has, he wants to stay neutral while watching them destroy their own country. The value of partership is more than being their instructor. He knows who and what they are, he is dismantling them.

Agent truth's profile picture
Agent truth2 days ago

Bridget, the only thing that 9/11 has taught the US is they need another one to get another wake up call. But by that time it’ll be too late. Because the UK is the same thing if you look at it just today, they released those terrorist back on the streets despite them driving around in three vans that were packed with explosives not firecrackers explosives to do some serious damage and they were going to the RAF base and why would they go there simple the United States has billions of dollars worth of their assets parked on that base. Just imagine one van per aircraft if there are B1 or B2 bombers that are there the B2 bomber cost over $1.6 billion for one of those aircraft and if one of those vans hit one of them well that’s $1.6 billion down the toilet for the US taxpayers that they would have to pay to replace. And today’s dollars it would be $2.1 billion to replace a B2 bomber if one of those vans would take one of those aircraft out of commission and since they have three of those vans that would be three aircraft they would destroy. and if they would destroy with those vans one or two B1 bombers to replace at today’s dollars that would be $1.5 billion per aircraft at today’s dollars compared to what they costed back in the day when they were first built they were $300 million when they were first built because those terrorist were not going out for a little joyride they were going out to create damage and chaos because they figured if they removed two or three assets from the chessboard that would greatly affect the Americans ability to project power. The way I see it. I see it in a broad spectrum. The UK government is stupid plain and simple why the president doesn’t pull out their assets from that area is beyond me. It’s like they want their shit to be destroyed because then that would give them car, Blanche to reap the world win on Iran meaning all bets will be off the table strategic nuclear arms would be used meaning tactical nukes, and that wouldn’t be too good for the regime because they would be glowing green from nuclear waste. Not to mention, millions of innocent civilians, dying in the aftermath. You do realize that when the United States dropped the two nukes on Japan during World War II they didn’t just kill military people and military assets meaning bases, etc. etc. etc. they killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians that were just doing their daily activity working shopping, housekeeping, etc., etc. children going to school. A lot of innocent people died during that period of time. It’s like the Vietnam war too. That was one war of the United States should never have gotten involved in never. Because at the end, it was a waste of time and a waste of human lives and for what to stop communism well look at the results the whole country of Vietnam not just the north is now a whole communist country. At what end was the results worth it? No, they weren’t. I have a relative who died in the Vietnam war Like said before it was a war, the United States should’ve never gotten involved in. They should’ve just supplied weapons and that’s it. Should have would have could have those are the riddles of the time. Going back to the UK they forgot about their own history. That is Islamic group detonated a bomb and killed a lot of people in their subway one time and then they’re forgetting about the UK bus bombing incident that happened to them that was done by an Islamic Revolutionary person who was a suicide bomber, along with the one that was in the sub way. Statistics say that Countries that forget about their own history, wind up, repeating it eventually again. @realDonaldTrump @VP @RealAlexJones @SecWar

Beelzebub's profile picture
Beelzebub2 days ago

Obviously they where not terrorists if they were released on bail, you are so stupid.

God, Family Country's profile picture
God, Family Country2 days ago

Are you kidding me. Terrorist should not have any rights, it’s a war crime.

ConcernedCitizen's profile picture
ConcernedCitizen2 days ago

Then why were the investigator not supplied with evidence form the IC??

Packy's profile picture
Packy2 days ago

But not the Brits.

R.Flores's profile picture
R.Flores2 days ago

To be fair if they didn't have explosives what can they do? Maybe it was a dry run and the anti-terrorist unit had some bad intel.

JULIE LONERGAN's profile picture
JULIE LONERGAN2 days ago

Is that not committing more against the United States to release criminals that pose in eminent threat to America’s safety and security?

Anthony Molnar's profile picture
Anthony Molnar2 days ago

And yet....

Aunt Fuddyduddy's profile picture
Aunt Fuddyduddy2 days ago

I understand it's a UK US base. If the UK part of the base let them go, can't the US part of the base arrest them and hold them under US military law?

KB's profile picture
KB2 days ago

What the hell?

GW's profile picture
GW2 days ago

yep , RID AMERICA OF ALL MIDDLE EAST ARABS n JEWS alike . GTFO .... AND TAKE UR 2800+ YEARS WAR with you dirt bags

Alex Kornik's profile picture
Alex Kornik2 days ago

Because they are not terrorists and Trump like always, jumped the gun.

Ian Newlove's profile picture
Ian Newlove2 days ago

He knows shit about them. If he did it wouldn’t have taken a local farmer to alert the authorities. Once again you’re being gaslit to by a failing president, who is also a sex abuser, felon, prolific liar, misogynist, friend of a sex trafficker of young girls and paedophile.

The man with no name, Jim Owens's profile picture
The man with no name, Jim Owens2 days ago

What were they gonna terrorize without any explosives or weapons? I get that fuel thieves are less sensational but we can't just lie about everything.

Related Videos