Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“He did something jaw-dropping to me. He read a statement from his phone.” That is the issue right there. Scott Pelley was not making an argument. He was applying emotional blackmail to CBS. It is the same tactic that works so well in corporate HR today: frame composure as...

johnkonrad's profile picture

John Ʌ Konrad V

154,610 subscribers

276,672 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Walton Goggins tells Tarantino he's not leaving the audition room — 'Getting the job is irrelevant to me' “I said: I'm not leaving. He said: what do you mean? I said: I want to read all of these roles. He said: what are you talking about? I said: getting the job is irrelevant to me.” “Quentin read every other role as if he was filming it. And then I read Leo's role and he read every other role as if we were filming it — and it was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist.” “A couple of months go by — and I get a call that he wants me to come and play with him. And that was the beginning of two of the greatest experiences of my life.”
1:50

Walton Goggins tells Tarantino he's not leaving the audition room — 'Getting the job is irrelevant to me' “I said: I'm not leaving. He said: what do you mean? I said: I want to read all of these roles. He said: what are you talking about? I said: getting the job is irrelevant to me.” “Quentin read every other role as if he was filming it. And then I read Leo's role and he read every other role as if we were filming it — and it was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist.” “A couple of months go by — and I get a call that he wants me to come and play with him. And that was the beginning of two of the greatest experiences of my life.”

ramagazzi

2,688,619 views • 1 month ago

The Cultural Tutor grew to 1.6 million Twitter followers in less than two years of full-time writing. He insists that his unique writing style comes from his unique reading style. He avoids new books and basically doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years. The problem with new books isn't that they're bad. The problem is that everybody else is reading them, which doesn't give you much edge as a writer. In the words of The Cultural Tutor: "The simplest reason not to read something published in the last 50 years is because that's what everyone else is reading. The only books that most people read are books published in last, not even ... In the last six years, in the last two years. I'm not disparaging these authors. They've done incredibly well for themselves, and I have no doubt their books are filled with marvels and wonderful, wonderful things, but the rest of the world is reading them. And it's a simple fact of life that if you consume, you read what everyone else is reading, then the likelihood that you will write what they are writing, and worst of all, think what they are thinking increases. It's not certain, but if we all read the same books, we all think the same things."
3:43

The Cultural Tutor grew to 1.6 million Twitter followers in less than two years of full-time writing. He insists that his unique writing style comes from his unique reading style. He avoids new books and basically doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years. The problem with new books isn't that they're bad. The problem is that everybody else is reading them, which doesn't give you much edge as a writer. In the words of The Cultural Tutor: "The simplest reason not to read something published in the last 50 years is because that's what everyone else is reading. The only books that most people read are books published in last, not even ... In the last six years, in the last two years. I'm not disparaging these authors. They've done incredibly well for themselves, and I have no doubt their books are filled with marvels and wonderful, wonderful things, but the rest of the world is reading them. And it's a simple fact of life that if you consume, you read what everyone else is reading, then the likelihood that you will write what they are writing, and worst of all, think what they are thinking increases. It's not certain, but if we all read the same books, we all think the same things."

David Perell

96,667 views • 2 years ago

The debate was on if The Book of Mormon is demonic” He admits he has not read it He admits it’s basically teaching the same stuff as the Bible. He can’t point to a single verse that is demonic. Oof.
0:45

The debate was on if The Book of Mormon is demonic” He admits he has not read it He admits it’s basically teaching the same stuff as the Bible. He can’t point to a single verse that is demonic. Oof.

Thoughtful-Faith

61,379 views • 3 months ago

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.
2:08

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.

Julie Carpenter

16,137 views • 1 year ago

Walton Goggins told Quentin Tarantino he didn’t care about getting hired for Django Unchained. He just wanted to perform the 4 lead roles in front of him. “I said, I'm not leaving. I want to read all of these roles, Leo's role, Sam's role, all of them. Because I don't care if I get this job, that's irrelevant to me. The only thing I care about is having the opportunity to say Quentin Tarantino's words in front of Quentin Tarantino. He said, 'Are you serious?' I said, 'Yeah.' He said, 'Yeah, let's fucking do it.' He sat there with me in that room for another 45 minutes, maybe an hour, and we just read through his script. I read Sam's role, and he read every other role as if he was filming it. Then I read Leo's role, and he read every other role as if we were filming it. It was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist. At the end of it, I hugged him and said, 'Thank you. That was a dream come true, and good luck with your movie. I can't wait to watch it!”
1:22

Walton Goggins told Quentin Tarantino he didn’t care about getting hired for Django Unchained. He just wanted to perform the 4 lead roles in front of him. “I said, I'm not leaving. I want to read all of these roles, Leo's role, Sam's role, all of them. Because I don't care if I get this job, that's irrelevant to me. The only thing I care about is having the opportunity to say Quentin Tarantino's words in front of Quentin Tarantino. He said, 'Are you serious?' I said, 'Yeah.' He said, 'Yeah, let's fucking do it.' He sat there with me in that room for another 45 minutes, maybe an hour, and we just read through his script. I read Sam's role, and he read every other role as if he was filming it. Then I read Leo's role, and he read every other role as if we were filming it. It was one of the greatest days of my life as an artist. At the end of it, I hugged him and said, 'Thank you. That was a dream come true, and good luck with your movie. I can't wait to watch it!”

👽

1,037,329 views • 1 month ago

Akademiks questions the CREDIBILITY of Islam during a heated argument with Sneako “What’s the proof that Allah sent the word to Gabriel & passed it down to Muhammad, who was at that meeting… you just read it in a book.. So Muhammad could see everything but he couldn’t read ?..He knows how many levels of the mountains & atmosphere but he didn’t know his ABC… you telling me God gave him all the knowledge except the ability to read & write”
2:35

Akademiks questions the CREDIBILITY of Islam during a heated argument with Sneako “What’s the proof that Allah sent the word to Gabriel & passed it down to Muhammad, who was at that meeting… you just read it in a book.. So Muhammad could see everything but he couldn’t read ?..He knows how many levels of the mountains & atmosphere but he didn’t know his ABC… you telling me God gave him all the knowledge except the ability to read & write”

validate

281,933 views • 3 months ago

"The simplest reason to not read something published in the past 50 years is that's what everybody else is reading. The only books that most people read are books published in the last two years. And it's a simple fact of life that if you read what everybody else is reading, then the likelihood that you will write what they are writing and worst of all think what they are thinking is, let's say... increased." (From my interview with The Cultural Tutor)
0:45

"The simplest reason to not read something published in the past 50 years is that's what everybody else is reading. The only books that most people read are books published in the last two years. And it's a simple fact of life that if you read what everybody else is reading, then the likelihood that you will write what they are writing and worst of all think what they are thinking is, let's say... increased." (From my interview with The Cultural Tutor)

David Perell

184,088 views • 2 years ago

🥴Trump said he is disappointed that Zelenskyy still has not reviewed the peace proposal: "I have to say that I'm a little bit disappointed that President Zelensky hasn't yet read the proposal. That was as of a few hours ago. His people love it. But he hasn't. Russia is fine with it. You know, Russia... I guess would rather have the whole country when you think of it. But Russia is, I believe, fine with it, but I'm not sure Zelensky is fine with it. His people love it, but he hasn't read it."
0:34

🥴Trump said he is disappointed that Zelenskyy still has not reviewed the peace proposal: "I have to say that I'm a little bit disappointed that President Zelensky hasn't yet read the proposal. That was as of a few hours ago. His people love it. But he hasn't. Russia is fine with it. You know, Russia... I guess would rather have the whole country when you think of it. But Russia is, I believe, fine with it, but I'm not sure Zelensky is fine with it. His people love it, but he hasn't read it."

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

33,216 views • 9 months ago

Out of his own mouth, #Turtleboy admits that he and Karen Read have known since February (as well as Read's attorneys) that the federal investigation was closed without any targets, arrests or findings of wrongdoing. They hid that from the public and lied about it for months because the trial was ongoing, and Karen wanted to mislead the public into accquitting her. Shameful. There are no "real killers." Several law enforcement agencies investigated this and only ever found evidence to support Karen Read being the killer. Because she is. This is innocence fraud, and it is the antithesis of justice. Shameful.
0:37

Out of his own mouth, #Turtleboy admits that he and Karen Read have known since February (as well as Read's attorneys) that the federal investigation was closed without any targets, arrests or findings of wrongdoing. They hid that from the public and lied about it for months because the trial was ongoing, and Karen wanted to mislead the public into accquitting her. Shameful. There are no "real killers." Several law enforcement agencies investigated this and only ever found evidence to support Karen Read being the killer. Because she is. This is innocence fraud, and it is the antithesis of justice. Shameful.

Masshole Mafia

169,353 views • 1 year ago

“When they brought the peace pact document, none of the aspirants read it. Hon. Bryan Acheampong signed where I was supposed to sign because he did not read it. That is how they sell Ghana, when they are given documents, they just sign.” - Kennedy Agyapong
1:50

“When they brought the peace pact document, none of the aspirants read it. Hon. Bryan Acheampong signed where I was supposed to sign because he did not read it. That is how they sell Ghana, when they are given documents, they just sign.” - Kennedy Agyapong

EDHUB🌍ℹ

177,242 views • 7 months ago

I need people to know that, under Principle 26 of the same Constitution that all of you have read,these are things that are already in your Constitution. But for you, Karuhanga, and your friends, you think that the Constitution is not something people should read. But when I entered Cabinet, the first thing I was given…
0:56

I need people to know that, under Principle 26 of the same Constitution that all of you have read,these are things that are already in your Constitution. But for you, Karuhanga, and your friends, you think that the Constitution is not something people should read. But when I entered Cabinet, the first thing I was given…

Barugahara Balaam Ateenyi.

105,943 views • 21 days ago

United Methodist 'pastor' explains why he refused to read the scripture reading or say 'amen' to it. "Do I really want to read that verse from Leviticus and say this is the 'word of God?'...and actually, as a gay man, no I don't."
1:20

United Methodist 'pastor' explains why he refused to read the scripture reading or say 'amen' to it. "Do I really want to read that verse from Leviticus and say this is the 'word of God?'...and actually, as a gay man, no I don't."

Protestia

117,446 views • 11 months ago

Babette Babich on why reading philosophy in translation is a fundamental problem: "If you don't read Aristotle in Greek, you cannot understand his argument. If you don't read Plato in Greek, you cannot understand his argument." Her reasoning is precise: translation is not a neutral act. "If you translate it into English, someone somewhere along the line will vary the word and then the argument falls apart." She uses Nietzsche as her sharpest example. The Cambridge edition aside, most English translations of Nietzsche don't give you Nietzsche. They give you the translator's interpretation of Nietzsche. She names Walter Kaufmann specifically: "He earns his name, he's a salesman. He sold Nietzsche to everyone as someone who was not really Nazi. He's very good. But that's the problem." The same logic applies to analytic philosophy's engagement with continental thinkers: "Analytic philosophers can teach you how to read Nietzsche. But I would say they really can't. You cannot read Nietzsche in translation. You can, but you'll be reading a lovely man, R.J. Hollingdale. You will not be reading Nietzsche." Her deeper point is about what makes a genuine continental philosopher and why that tradition is quietly disappearing: "The distinction is over because everyone has died. Who are actual continental philosophers? You're looking at one. But there are not a lot of them. And I'm not long for this world." What made Gadamer great wasn't that he wrote "Truth and Method". It's that he was a philologist first. He read Greek. What made Nietzsche penetrating was that he was a scholar of Greek. That's precisely why Bernard Williams took him so seriously. The language wasn't incidental. It was the method. When the last generation who had those teachers is gone, something irreplaceable goes with them.
1:13

Babette Babich on why reading philosophy in translation is a fundamental problem: "If you don't read Aristotle in Greek, you cannot understand his argument. If you don't read Plato in Greek, you cannot understand his argument." Her reasoning is precise: translation is not a neutral act. "If you translate it into English, someone somewhere along the line will vary the word and then the argument falls apart." She uses Nietzsche as her sharpest example. The Cambridge edition aside, most English translations of Nietzsche don't give you Nietzsche. They give you the translator's interpretation of Nietzsche. She names Walter Kaufmann specifically: "He earns his name, he's a salesman. He sold Nietzsche to everyone as someone who was not really Nazi. He's very good. But that's the problem." The same logic applies to analytic philosophy's engagement with continental thinkers: "Analytic philosophers can teach you how to read Nietzsche. But I would say they really can't. You cannot read Nietzsche in translation. You can, but you'll be reading a lovely man, R.J. Hollingdale. You will not be reading Nietzsche." Her deeper point is about what makes a genuine continental philosopher and why that tradition is quietly disappearing: "The distinction is over because everyone has died. Who are actual continental philosophers? You're looking at one. But there are not a lot of them. And I'm not long for this world." What made Gadamer great wasn't that he wrote "Truth and Method". It's that he was a philologist first. He read Greek. What made Nietzsche penetrating was that he was a scholar of Greek. That's precisely why Bernard Williams took him so seriously. The language wasn't incidental. It was the method. When the last generation who had those teachers is gone, something irreplaceable goes with them.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

24,301 views • 5 months ago

Paul Mescal read "The History of Sound" script when he was 24 and then shot it when he was 28. "Love is a very hard thing to pin down. What I found so moving about the screenplay is it's not described in words but in actions."
1:24

Paul Mescal read "The History of Sound" script when he was 24 and then shot it when he was 28. "Love is a very hard thing to pin down. What I found so moving about the screenplay is it's not described in words but in actions."

Variety

30,822 views • 1 year ago

“It is unheard of that a defendant, even in open court, would slap his counsel to keep quiet while he is talking. Get the sentence to him because it is an order of this court. I have read the entire file from the time the matter started in 2015. No doubt, the convict has not acted well throughout this period. He has caused several delays and then started crying that he is being held unlawfully without trial. Also, his unruly behaviour from the beginning till today has been noticed.” – Justice James Omotosho
2:30

“It is unheard of that a defendant, even in open court, would slap his counsel to keep quiet while he is talking. Get the sentence to him because it is an order of this court. I have read the entire file from the time the matter started in 2015. No doubt, the convict has not acted well throughout this period. He has caused several delays and then started crying that he is being held unlawfully without trial. Also, his unruly behaviour from the beginning till today has been noticed.” – Justice James Omotosho

TheCable

87,211 views • 9 months ago

U.S. President Donald J. Trump attacks 60 Minutes and CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell during today’s interview, calling them a “disgrace,” after he was read a quote from the manifesto of Cole Thomas Allen, the shooter in last night’s attempted attack on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington. Interviewer: “The so-called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President. He appears to reference a motive in it. He writes this quote, ‘Administration officials, they are targets.’ And he also wrote this, ‘I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.’ What's your reaction to that?” President Trump: “Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're horrible people. Horrible people. Yeah, he did write that. I'm not a rapist. I didn't rape anybody. I'm not a pedophile.” Interviewer: “Do you think he was referring to you?” President Trump: “Excuse me. I'm not a pedophile. You read that crap from some sick person. I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me. I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with, let's say, Epstein or other things. But I said to myself, you know, I'll do this interview and they'll probably... I read the manifesto. You know, he's a sick person. But... You should be ashamed of yourself reading that because I'm not any of those things. You're a disgrace. But go ahead. Let's finish the interview. You're disgraceful.”
1:21

U.S. President Donald J. Trump attacks 60 Minutes and CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell during today’s interview, calling them a “disgrace,” after he was read a quote from the manifesto of Cole Thomas Allen, the shooter in last night’s attempted attack on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington. Interviewer: “The so-called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President. He appears to reference a motive in it. He writes this quote, ‘Administration officials, they are targets.’ And he also wrote this, ‘I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.’ What's your reaction to that?” President Trump: “Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're horrible people. Horrible people. Yeah, he did write that. I'm not a rapist. I didn't rape anybody. I'm not a pedophile.” Interviewer: “Do you think he was referring to you?” President Trump: “Excuse me. I'm not a pedophile. You read that crap from some sick person. I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me. I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with, let's say, Epstein or other things. But I said to myself, you know, I'll do this interview and they'll probably... I read the manifesto. You know, he's a sick person. But... You should be ashamed of yourself reading that because I'm not any of those things. You're a disgrace. But go ahead. Let's finish the interview. You're disgraceful.”

OSINTdefender

281,895 views • 4 months ago

This what all Christians want right? Your Utopia arrives when the Jews accept the jewish savior you worship, that was predicted in their fake books right? "I'm a Jew by birth" "I received Jesus and and believe that he is the son of God and he is also the Jewish Messiah" "The apostles. They were all Jews" "You have Jews, you have Gentiles. But once they are in the church, once they receive the Messiah, Jesus, once they receive Jesus as the son of God risen from the dead, boom, they become one together in the body of Christ" "You know, some people would say to me, how can you being a Jew read the New Testament? And I'm like, how can you being a Gentile appreciate the New Testament because it is so Jewish? When you read it through the lens of the Jewish perspective, you understand much better the things that that Jesus was teaching, the things that Paul was teaching, the Jewishness of it"
6:35

This what all Christians want right? Your Utopia arrives when the Jews accept the jewish savior you worship, that was predicted in their fake books right? "I'm a Jew by birth" "I received Jesus and and believe that he is the son of God and he is also the Jewish Messiah" "The apostles. They were all Jews" "You have Jews, you have Gentiles. But once they are in the church, once they receive the Messiah, Jesus, once they receive Jesus as the son of God risen from the dead, boom, they become one together in the body of Christ" "You know, some people would say to me, how can you being a Jew read the New Testament? And I'm like, how can you being a Gentile appreciate the New Testament because it is so Jewish? When you read it through the lens of the Jewish perspective, you understand much better the things that that Jesus was teaching, the things that Paul was teaching, the Jewishness of it"

Seethroughitall

39,761 views • 8 months ago

This book, It's Perfectly Normal, is in the Asheville School District in, NC. As a matter of fact, it's in numerous school districts around the country. The board, as expected, didn't want me to read it, but 10 yeard olds can read it and view all of the pornography it propagates. Was it something I said? Or was it something I read? Go to to support the ERACED project and help me take my message around the country! A special thanks to for archiving all of the gender theory/queer theory/woke books in NC. PEP is an EPIC organization.
1:10

This book, It's Perfectly Normal, is in the Asheville School District in, NC. As a matter of fact, it's in numerous school districts around the country. The board, as expected, didn't want me to read it, but 10 yeard olds can read it and view all of the pornography it propagates. Was it something I said? Or was it something I read? Go to to support the ERACED project and help me take my message around the country! A special thanks to for archiving all of the gender theory/queer theory/woke books in NC. PEP is an EPIC organization.

John K. Amanchukwu Sr.

18,828,545 views • 3 years ago

President Trump: "We've been speaking to President Putin and we've been speaking to Ukrainian leaders, including Zelenskyy, President Zelenskyy. And I'm a little bit disappointed that President Zelenskyy hasn't yet read the proposal. That was as of a few hours ago. His people love it, but he hasn't. Russia's fine with it. Russia, I guess, would rather have the whole country, when you think of it. But Russia is, I believe, fine with it [the deal]. But I'm not sure that Zelenskyy is fine with it. His people love it. But he hasn't read it." My comment: President Zelenskyy has repeatedly said he has received reports on the discussions of the plan and engaging with Ukraine's negotiations team.
0:43

President Trump: "We've been speaking to President Putin and we've been speaking to Ukrainian leaders, including Zelenskyy, President Zelenskyy. And I'm a little bit disappointed that President Zelenskyy hasn't yet read the proposal. That was as of a few hours ago. His people love it, but he hasn't. Russia's fine with it. Russia, I guess, would rather have the whole country, when you think of it. But Russia is, I believe, fine with it [the deal]. But I'm not sure that Zelenskyy is fine with it. His people love it. But he hasn't read it." My comment: President Zelenskyy has repeatedly said he has received reports on the discussions of the plan and engaging with Ukraine's negotiations team.

Anton Gerashchenko

80,041 views • 9 months ago