正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

He doesn’t miss: “This is not sovereignty. This is anti-sovereignty. And whoever’s telling you this works needs to be fired because they are hurting your country.” “My biggest criticism of regulation outside of America is: please get technical experts to do it.” “Those companies are exfiltrating, not intentionally, your...

301,732 次观看 • 10 天前 •via X (Twitter)

20 条评论

H 的头像
H10 天前

If I open my own company, I would spend all my money just to have Palantir as my consulting bae.

Chad Wahlquist 的头像
Chad Wahlquist10 天前

If you want consultant FDEs go to Microsoft, FDE is the product strategy not GTM. 🤗

Matt McDonagh 的头像
Matt McDonagh10 天前

“My biggest criticism of regulation outside of America is: please get technical experts to do it.” Amen. Systems and incentives create outcomes. We need people who understand the surface area of the problem and the capabilities of the technology to create those incentives. Not politicians and weasel businessmen.

Lady 的头像
Lady10 天前

He's 💯 correct.

SurgicalExcellenceThe3rd.0 的头像
SurgicalExcellenceThe3rd.010 天前

🤯

Cjay Chege 的头像
Cjay Chege10 天前

He himself doesn't understand the technology, given his pesmistic stance about Ai

90S KID 的头像
90S KID10 天前

The exfiltration quote has receipts. A frontier coding tool got caught uploading entire private repos, unredacted secrets included, 5.1 GB off a 12 GB repo. The fix was a hidden server-side flag.

Kuze Hideo🏴 的头像
Kuze Hideo🏴9 天前

He's a grifter. I don't believe a word or his fake honesty.

0nelight #SaveSoil 的头像
0nelight #SaveSoil10 天前

The way Cookie-Banners are implemented because the way EU legislation demands it is one example of this. It is unimaginable how much uselesss human time and energy is wasted everyday in clicking away cookie banners...

lehman Sterns 的头像
lehman Sterns10 天前

except The United States regulates artificial intelligence through a decentralized mix of federal executive actions, targeted agency enforcement, and a growing patchwork of state-level laws rather than a single comprehensive federal rulebook.

Amanda L 的头像
Amanda L7 天前

Their (big labs) own CEOs don't even understand their own tech

Zäna Hitler ✝️🇩🇪🇵🇱🇨🇭🇺🇸 的头像
Zäna Hitler ✝️🇩🇪🇵🇱🇨🇭🇺🇸10 天前

Next time you should ask him how it feels to be a black Jew

Semper Fi 🪖 的头像
Semper Fi 🪖10 天前

@jawwwn_ 💯🪖🫡🇺🇸

Armaan Sidhu 的头像
Armaan Sidhu10 天前

"I don't think people are down for me being 20 times wealthier" is an unusually honest sentence from someone at the top of an AI boom, and it points at the political problem the industry keeps deferring. The distributional question is not ideological. It is mechanical, and it turns on what share of AI's gains flows to labour versus to capital. Previous general purpose technologies split that share badly and slowly. Electrification and mechanisation both raised aggregate output enormously while producing decades of dislocation first. The institutions that eventually distributed those gains were built during the disruption rather than ahead of it. Nobody has built the equivalent for this cycle. The admission that follows matters more than the confession. Saying you believe redistribution is necessary while adding that you are the wrong person to explain it describes an accountability vacuum rather than humility. If the beneficiaries will not make the argument, the argument gets made by people hostile to the technology. The regulatory point in the same set is separate and stronger. Rules written without technical expertise routinely produce the opposite of their intent, and a policy that pushes sensitive workloads onto foreign hosted models exports the exact data it was meant to protect. Both critiques can be right at once. An industry that concentrates gains this fast and declines to explain the distribution is not avoiding politics. It is delaying it until someone less friendly writes the terms.

wild p. swing 的头像
wild p. swing10 天前

sounds like a sales pitch

CHERAY 的头像
CHERAY10 天前

✨🔥✨

Cassandra Goddess SIM 的头像
Cassandra Goddess SIM10 天前

My husband is an expert. They won't let our brightest write Regulations.

Bobby 的头像
Bobby10 天前

@jawwwn_ Thank you for preserving our way of life. Semper Fidelis

Ichi wa Zen, Zen wa Ichi 的头像
Ichi wa Zen, Zen wa Ichi10 天前

💯

jklre 的头像
jklre10 天前

I love it when this guy talks about this. He is a walking commercial for our AI lab right now. This was the thesis of our founding. Own your AI, your data. We dont want it but we can help you train it on your airgapped systems with our tools.

相关视频

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 次观看 • 4 个月前

Andrej Karpathy explains what makes Elon Musk unique “I don’t think people appreciate how unique [Elon’s style] is. You read about it, but you don’t understand it—it’s hard to describe.” The first principle Karpathy — who led the computer vision team of Tesla Autopilot — has observed is that Musk likes small, strong, highly-technical teams: “At companies by default, teams grow and get large. Elon was always a force against growth… I would have to basically plead to hire people. And then the other thing is that at big companies it’s hard to get rid of low performers. Elon is very friendly by default to getting rid of low performers. I actually had to fight to keep people on the team because he would by default want to remove people… So keep a small, strong, highly technical team. No middle management that is non-technical for sure. That’s number one.” Number two is that Elon wants the office to be a vibrant place where everyone is working on exciting stuff: “He doesn’t like stagnation… He doesn’t like large meetings. He always encourages people to leave meetings if they’re not being useful. You actually do see this where it’s a large meeting and if you’re not contributing or learning, just walk out. This is fully encouraged… I think a lot of big companies pamper employees, but there’s much less of that. The culture of it is that you’re there to do your best technical work and there’s intensity.” Elon is also unusual in terms of how closely connected he is to the team: “Usually the CEO of a company is a remote person, five layers up, who only talks to their VPs… Normally people spend 99% of the time talking to the VPs. [Elon] spends maybe 50% of the time. And he just wants to talk to the engineers. If the team is small and strong, then engineers and the code are the source of truth… not some manager. And he wants to talk to them to understand the actual state of things and what should be done to improve it.” And lastly, Karpathy believes the extent to which Musk is involved day-to-day operations and removing company bottlenecks is not appreciated. He gives an example of engineers telling Elon they don’t have enough GPUs. As Karpathy explains, if Elon hears this twice he’ll get the person in charge of the GPU cluster on the phone. If NVIDIA is the bottleneck, he’ll get Jensen Huang on the phone. Video source: Sequoia Capital (2024)

Startup Archive

2,422,351 次观看 • 1 年前

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

Brian Kight

308,878 次观看 • 1 年前

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,190,914 次观看 • 1 年前