Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

He grabs her hips and rails her senseless while those huge tits slap like crazy... 🔥 Brazzers ADULT ARENA ANGELA WHITE HA HA HA #Brazzers #BigBoobs #HardPounding #NSFW #CumWatch #PornAddict

15,181 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

So I started the k-drama Climax starring Ju Ji-hoon and Ha Ji-won and yeah, this one is not here to play. From episode one, you can already tell this is going to be one of those dramas where everybody is a little bit dangerous. No clean heroes. Ju Ji-hoon’s character is Cold and Calculative. The kind of man that will look you in the eye while making a decision that ruins you and still sleep well at night. He’s not pretending to be righteous and I actually respect the drama for that. Then Ha Ji-won There’s this quiet desperation in her character very controlled. And their dynamic is definitely Not romance. Not partnership. It feels like a slow burning power struggle disguised as a relationship. That’s honestly what makes this drama interesting so far it’s not trying to sell love, it’s selling ambition, ego, and survival. The vibe is dark, Like everybody is smiling but nobody is safe. I feel like with this K-drama If you miss one small detail, you’ll be confused later because everything already feels intentional. The drama is giving that “this will get messy” energy, and I like it🤭. It’s still early but it definitely doesn’t look like one of those dramas that start strong and lose direction. If anything, it feels like it’s building towards something chaotic. Anyways If you like your K-dramas with: morally questionable characters power games and k-dramas that keep you tensed Then you may wanna check it out #climax

EdoQueen🌹

15,018 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Thank you Evans for this. I have always said this and I love that more people are seeing it as well. When Meg lied on Oprah that a senior royal has worried about what colour of skin Archie would be, I always said It was herself she was talking about. Narcissists ALWAYS accuse their victims of doing what they do themselves. They projects constantly. Every accusation is a self confession and you can clearly see Meg's desperation to be seen as a White british royal; She is desperate🔥 That is why she writes the titles everywhere even on her own clothes and front door rug🤡 She is not trying to be relatable, she treats americans like "illiterate villagers"; and she sees herself as the british royal there to teach them about life and impress her "Lofty" knowledge on "peasant americans." That is how she treated her guests who all had to sing how pretty she is and how great she is; that is how she treats Serena and all her "Friends". She is superior, they are there to do her bidding and worship her😏 Yet the general public can see what an incredibly insecure woman she is. She has done everything she could to "white pass" and erased her black carribean roots from her mother. At one point Meg even claimed yo be italian; Anything but accepting her afro carribean and american roots🤦🏽‍♀️ She only use Doria as a "black card" when she needs to attack the RF and cosplay a victim of Racism. But in real life Meghan is desperate to be seen as a white british royal. She is so desperate that she sat on Drew Barrymore show and pretended that her children, born and raise in the US; by an american mother and a black carribean grandmother "Still have british accent" STILL?!!!🤡 The boy left the UK when he was 6 months and has never been back. The daughter was born in the US and Has never been to the UK. Harry's british accent has become so washed out it is embarrassing. So what British Accent do they STILL have?!🤡 This donkey is so delusional and obsessed with Great Britian, it is embarrasing how pathologically she lies. Meghan has never taken pride in her black features: she had surgery to correct her nose and she permanently altered her curls chemically to look more White. She has one daughter and did not bother to name that daughter after her black mother or any black family member or black feminists. She picked two white british women🤡 More to the point, while living in California, she dresses or rather photoshop that girl wearing english garments with tights exactly like Princess Charlotte dressed as a little girl. But remember this is the Meghan who refused and mocked Catherine for wanting the bridesmaids to wear tights at her wedding🤡 Meg has never praised Archie's features or brown eyes, but she has been gushing about her daughter blue eyes "like Diana". She has never praised ANY feature that could be associated with the black skin🔥 But she quasi-orgasmed on Netflix about her daughter blue eyes and red hair Screaming "Blue blue blue eyes!"🤦🏽‍♀️ My goodness... how embarrasing. No Meg has never wanted to be relatable or black; she wants to feel superior and wants to be identified as a white british royal. This is why she clinge to those titles like glue. She takes zero pride in her black caribbean or american roots; None. Yes, she was the one who worried, Doria's blood would come through and show in her children🤡 She sat there days and nights worrying Archie might not be white enough to fit her ideal of the perfect little white boy...maybe blond with "blue, blue, blue eyes" looking so eerily like Diana..😏☕️ 📹Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧

Canellecitadelle

49,242 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Rolling Stones - Angie (1973) The big rumor about this song is that it was written about David Bowie's wife, Angela, who wrote in her autobiography that she once walked in on Bowie and Mick Jagger in bed together - a story Jagger denies. According to the rumor, Jagger wrote this song to appease her, but it was Jagger's bandmate Keith Richards who wrote most of the song. Jagger had this to say about it: "People began to say that song was written about David Bowie's wife but the truth is that Keith wrote the title. He said, 'Angie,' and I think it was to do with his daughter. She's called Angela. And then I just wrote the rest of it." There was also speculation that Richards' girlfriend Anita Pallenberg inspired this song, but Keith cleared it up in his 2010 autobiography Life, where he wrote: "While I was in the [Vevey drug] clinic (in March-April 1972), Anita was down the road having our daughter, Angela. Once I came out of the usual trauma, I had a guitar with me and I wrote 'Angie' in an afternoon, sitting in bed, because I could finally move my fingers and put them in the right place again, and I didn't feel like I had to s--t the bed or climb the walls or feel manic anymore. I just went, 'Angie, Angie.' It was not about any particular person; it was a name, like ohhh, Diana. I didn't know Angela was going to be called Angela when I wrote 'Angie.' In those days you didn't know what sex the thing was going to be until it popped out." This was the first single released from Goat's Head Soup. It wasn't typical of their sound, since most of the band's material at the time was hard and aggressive. Still, it was a huge hit, and their only ballad that hit #1 in the US.

🎸 Rock History 🎸

49,515 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Rolling Stones - Angie (1973) The big rumor about this song is that it was written about David Bowie's wife, Angela, who wrote in her autobiography that she once walked in on Bowie and Mick Jagger in bed together - a story Jagger denies. According to the rumor, Jagger wrote this song to appease her, but it was Jagger's bandmate Keith Richards who wrote most of the song. Jagger had this to say about it: "People began to say that song was written about David Bowie's wife but the truth is that Keith wrote the title. He said, 'Angie,' and I think it was to do with his daughter. She's called Angela. And then I just wrote the rest of it." There was also speculation that Richards' girlfriend Anita Pallenberg inspired this song, but Keith cleared it up in his 2010 autobiography Life, where he wrote: "While I was in the [Vevey drug] clinic (in March-April 1972), Anita was down the road having our daughter, Angela. Once I came out of the usual trauma, I had a guitar with me and I wrote 'Angie' in an afternoon, sitting in bed, because I could finally move my fingers and put them in the right place again, and I didn't feel like I had to s--t the bed or climb the walls or feel manic anymore. I just went, 'Angie, Angie.' It was not about any particular person; it was a name, like ohhh, Diana. I didn't know Angela was going to be called Angela when I wrote 'Angie.' In those days you didn't know what sex the thing was going to be until it popped out." This was the first single released from Goat's Head Soup. It wasn't typical of their sound, since most of the band's material at the time was hard and aggressive. Still, it was a huge hit, and their only ballad that hit #1 in the US.

🎸 Rock History 🎸

91,929 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The fancams of Choi San doing 'Bad' slowmo version at the ateez fanmeeting are also going viral on all platforms with 1.2M views, 1M views, 900k views etc within 1-2 days. People are praising his facial expressions and dance moves ❤️ Some top comments: -look at how he used his facial expressions. What should I do really, he's crazy (p) -this guy.. he knows his charms so well -this expressions is just insane -so the problem is not the tanktop, it's just this man aura is insane -it's so good I need to turn off my wifi (because they don't think they should watch it freely) -idk dancing to bad in suits is more dangerous -why this is better than the sleeveless one -slowmo version is crazy -this man fineness is on another level he just fire!🔥 -i love u let's get married right away -the chills in my spine when he smiled.. I think he would be a good actor.. -he's frickin handsome -please consider acting too, you have a handsome face with actor vibes -i'm not a fan but I can't stop watching this -even as a guy, I think he's super charming -Choi San when smiling he drives me crazy - I seriously think that gaze is insane. It feels like he's seducing us with his eyes yet his moves are also clean and deep. I've never seen a gaze and facial expressions like that from idols. Absolutely insane. -aaahh shiitt he knows exactly what he's doing -now I understand why people call it "let's all d!e" part -the way he moves is absolutely insane and those smile is lethal -i hope he takes this opportunity to learn acting seriously and debut as an actor, his facial expressions is so good -ha really.. he's so sexy and charming. That kind of charisma is something you're born with. It's not something you can create through practice. He just born with that aura. It's like watching a famous courtesan from Joseon Dynasty who squandered the fortunes of noblemen. Why does it feel like I'm watching p0rn eventho he's fully clothed..? -Netflix.. please make San as the main character of webtoon adapted drama -Dont smile like that I'm melting -There are many handsome idols but this man handsomeness, aura and talents are just different -I'm never interested in K-Pop male idols before but this guy is so attractive -he's like the idol version of Heo Namjun, it's like he knows how to f*ck with his eyes #san #choisan #산 #최산
0:25

Sensitive content

The fancams of Choi San doing 'Bad' slowmo version at the ateez fanmeeting are also going viral on all platforms with 1.2M views, 1M views, 900k views etc within 1-2 days. People are praising his facial expressions and dance moves ❤️ Some top comments: -look at how he used his facial expressions. What should I do really, he's crazy (p) -this guy.. he knows his charms so well -this expressions is just insane -so the problem is not the tanktop, it's just this man aura is insane -it's so good I need to turn off my wifi (because they don't think they should watch it freely) -idk dancing to bad in suits is more dangerous -why this is better than the sleeveless one -slowmo version is crazy -this man fineness is on another level he just fire!🔥 -i love u let's get married right away -the chills in my spine when he smiled.. I think he would be a good actor.. -he's frickin handsome -please consider acting too, you have a handsome face with actor vibes -i'm not a fan but I can't stop watching this -even as a guy, I think he's super charming -Choi San when smiling he drives me crazy - I seriously think that gaze is insane. It feels like he's seducing us with his eyes yet his moves are also clean and deep. I've never seen a gaze and facial expressions like that from idols. Absolutely insane. -aaahh shiitt he knows exactly what he's doing -now I understand why people call it "let's all d!e" part -the way he moves is absolutely insane and those smile is lethal -i hope he takes this opportunity to learn acting seriously and debut as an actor, his facial expressions is so good -ha really.. he's so sexy and charming. That kind of charisma is something you're born with. It's not something you can create through practice. He just born with that aura. It's like watching a famous courtesan from Joseon Dynasty who squandered the fortunes of noblemen. Why does it feel like I'm watching p0rn eventho he's fully clothed..? -Netflix.. please make San as the main character of webtoon adapted drama -Dont smile like that I'm melting -There are many handsome idols but this man handsomeness, aura and talents are just different -I'm never interested in K-Pop male idols before but this guy is so attractive -he's like the idol version of Heo Namjun, it's like he knows how to f*ck with his eyes #san #choisan #산 #최산

최산 애정해

27,837 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

sunoo childhood stories with his sister all soo funny🤣 🦊everyone, I also have a bit of a temper when I get angry. Seriously. No, but I’ve matured a lot. Originally.. well, I think those kinds of things happen between all family members, right? Probably? But it’s through those experiences that you actually get closer. If nothing like that ever happened, that would be truly unbelievable 🦊Suddenly, speaking of fighting stories, I just remembered a time I fought with my older sister. I think it was back in elementary school. My sister ate something of mine without asking I don’t remember the details but we ended up getting into a fight🤣 What was really funny was that when I kicked her, she didn’t even budge. She was just like, 'Ha!' But when she kicked me, I completely flew back and fell over. So, while fighting her, I just shouted, 'I surrender!' I lost🤣 🦊i’ve been thinking about my childhood a lot lately. My sister has always been strong Of course she was, she's three years older than me🤣 My sister might feel it's unfair if I only talk about my aide so let me tell another story. When I was a tiny baby I was just born and she was maybe 3 or 4 all the attention shifted to me. She used to really like me, but she got jealous because everyone was focused on me. She’d tell me to go away But here’s the reason she started to dislike me even more: when I was with her I would bite her on the back, pinch her, and scratch her. It was a mess! Also, there’s another story I just remembered. The reason I always had really short hair as a kid was because of my sister. She took a toy train (the kind with wheels) and rolled it all over my head, and my hair got so tangled in the wheels that they couldn't get it out. So my mom always had to cut my hair short🤣 too much TMI

🦊♡🐰ྀི | fan acc

39,976 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨THIS MANDELA DAY: PATHETIC WOKE LIBERALS LIKE CAROLYN STEYN AND HER 67 BLANKETS GLORIFY A TERRORIST – WHILE HIS ANC REGIME BUTCHERS FARMERS AND LOOTS THE NATION‼️ Tomorrow the ANC and their liberal woke lapdogs will once again demand we celebrate Mandela Day‼️ Pathetic figures like Carolyn Steyn and her 67 Blankets project pour money and effort into the legacy of a real terrorist🔥 Nelson Mandela founded Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the ANC’s armed wing. He chose the path of violent armed struggle. Under that leadership and the movement he built, MK carried out bombings that killed and maimed ordinary South Africans‼️ On 20 May 1983, MK detonated a car bomb in Church Street, Pretoria, outside the SAAF headquarters. Nineteen people were killed and more than 200 wounded🔥 Many were innocent civilians women and workers going about their day. On 23 December 1985, MK operative Andrew Zondo bombed the Amanzimtoti shopping centre near Durban, murdering five white civilians, including three young children aged two, five and eight‼️ Dozens more were horrifically injured. These were families on holiday, not soldiers. Mandela was in prison during many of these attacks, but he was the architect who created MK championed the armed struggle and remained its figurehead‼️ The blood of those innocent victims stains the legacy he and his comrades built. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission recorded that most people killed in MK operations were civilians.‼️ Then came the ultimate insult. This same man was made president and turned into a "global saint." As president he delivered South Africa to ANC rule, a regime that has enabled the ongoing slaughter of white farmers and their families in brutal farm attacks, often involving torture, rape and racial hatred, while the government downplays or ignores them🔥 The same regime has looted the state, destroyed institutions and turned the country into a failing, corrupt dictatorship‼️ Crime is out of control. The economy is gutted for connected cadres. While these woke liberal traitors crawl to honour a killer, the rest of us who work hard to feed the nation are told to bow before this fraud. Who in their right mind celebrates Mandela Day⁉️ Who can look at the children murdered in those bombings, the farmers slaughtered on their land and the country ruined by ANC corruption and say this man deserves a national holiday⁉️ This is not reconciliation, it is historical fraud🔥 Mandela Day is an annual insult to every victim of ANC violence past and present‼️ Stop the charade. ⌛️The innocent dead deserve better than this grotesque whitewash🔥

RaiZel

13,114 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼️Erika Kirk Just Posted NEW Vacation Pics To Her IG And I Have Questions Who Is The "MYSTERY MAN" With Her And WHY Is She Trying To Pass Someone Elses Kid Off As Gigi? 👀 On the anniversary of Charlie’s death, Candace sat down on her show and read the letters she has been writing to him in Heaven. People felt that because it was raw. It was ugly in the right way. It was a friend who is actually mourning him. Erika saw how that landed. Then she posts this family fishing clip with a caption written like a letter to Charlie. That is not grief. That is her watching what worked and running the same playbook. She has already admitted she researched how widows grieve. She said there is no blueprint. She did not feel it. She had to study it. This post is no different. The comments clocked it immediately — cringe, staged, fake. A person who cannot feel it copies the person who can. Now look at the video. That little girl on the deck in the pink Crocs, tie-dye hoodie, and baby fishing pole is not her daughter Gigi. Three weeks ago she posted Gigi at the Cubs–Diamondbacks game in the big 04 jersey, standing at the rail. Gigi is taller and older. So who is she hugging in this new clip? Who is she teaching to fish while she captions it like a letter to Charlie? Why pass someone else’s child off as her own? And who is the adult male in the white shirt sitting on that deck? This is supposed to be a private family trip. Who is close enough to be there with her and those kids? Who is holding the camera? Could that be Blake Wynn — the same guy she was caught with at the Beverly Hills Hotel — or another man she will not name? Charlie answered his critics to their face with more speech. He brought them to the front of the line. Erika stays quiet in public and directs her proxies to attack anyone who simply notices. If Erika Kirk will not answer these three basic questions — why copy Candace’s letters, who is that mystery little girl, and who is the man she trusted enough to take on a private family vacation around her kids — she is proving the point for us. Night and day from the man she claims to be mourning. ⚠️As you guys know this is now day 13 of no monetization. Now more than ever we rely on the support of our community to keep the Charlie Kirk investigation alive. If you value our work and want to support us, you can click the link in the post below to donate to our fundraiser. 👇

Project Constitution

178,472 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Mohammed Hijab, in his all smug pseudo-intellectual polish, telling Sneako that a thirteen-year-old girl sporting “huge hips and huge breasts” crosses some magical Islamic threshold into sexual availability. Pedophilia? Merely a “relative” notion, he lectures, dependent on culture, history, whim. In his worldview, the only real barrier is puberty: once the body ripens with those secondary sexual markers, a grown man may consummate. No higher moral objection. No recognition of childhood’s sanctity. Just biology and scripture. This is not abstract theology. It is the precise intellectual scaffolding that has justified the industrial-scale grooming and rape of native British girls for two decades, Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Telford, countless others. Thousands of our daughters violated by men who share Hijab’s foundational assumptions: that Western notions of consent, age, and protection are arbitrary, inferior, dispensable when weighed against the sunnah of a seventh-century warlord who married a six-year-old and took her at nine. Hijab does not merely defend an ancient text; he actively normalises its application today. He sneers at our age-of-consent laws, sixteen for excellent reason, as provincial hang-ups, while elevating a system that sees pubescent girls as permissible prey. That is not debate. That is ideological preparation for predation. England does not bargain over the bodies of our children. We do not entertain “context” when the subject is the sexual exploitation of minors. We do not permit foreign doctrines, however eloquently packaged, to erode the hard-won protections that safeguard our daughters from adult men who view them as halal once the “curves appear”. From the moment those “curves appear, breasts swelling, hips widening” (hijabs words), Hijab’s Islam deems the girl ready. Not for protection, not for continued childhood, but for marriage, consummation, the full weight of adult male desire laid upon a body that has only just begun to betray its innocence. Puberty becomes permission; biology overrides morality; the sunnah of a man who bedded a nine-year-old girl is held up as eternal wisdom, not aberration. This is the doctrine he peddles with calm confidence: that our instinctive revulsion at the thought of a grown man claiming a thirteen- or fourteen-year-old is mere cultural conditioning, a Western quirk to be dismissed. In his framework, the only sin would be acting before the body signals “maturity.” After that? Halal. Sacred, even. A continuation of prophetic precedent. We do not measure a child’s readiness by the onset of secondary sexual characteristics. We do not calibrate consent to the calendar of hormones. We set a firm line, sixteen, because we understand power imbalances, developmental vulnerability, the irreversible damage inflicted when an adult exploits a minor’s emerging form. Anything below that is rape. Statutory. Criminal. Non-negotiable. Yet here is Hijab, a mouthpiece for the very ideology that has already proven its incompatibility through decades of horror: the grooming gangs that targeted our girls precisely because their worldview sees no intrinsic wrong in adult men taking pubescent prey. Rotherham’s 1,400 documented victims, Rochdale’s rings, Oxford’s networks, Telford’s forgotten thousands, these were not random crimes. They were the logical outgrowth of a belief system that ranks divine example above secular law, that views Western child-protection norms as inferior superstition. When Hijab rationalises “huge hips and huge breasts” at thirteen as sufficient grounds for sexual availability, he is not offering scholarly nuance. He is providing ideological cover for the predators already in our midst. He is telling them, and their communities, that the revulsion of the native population is illegitimate, that our outrage is bigotry rather than justified defence of our own. Fucking scumbag.

Lewis.B.Rendell Official

107,833 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BRO… THE SINGER JUST LOOKED STRAIGHT INTO HER until you realize this entire concert video is AI-generated. Generated with Seedance 2.5 on FlovaAI Try it with prompt : “FRONT ROW GIRL” 30 SECONDS | 9:16 | PHOTOREALISTIC SMARTPHONE CONCERT VIDEO | SEEDANCE 2.5 | MULTISHOT CAMERA The entire video is captured on a modern smartphone by a beautiful young adult woman standing directly against the front-row barricade at a massive sold-out concert featuring a fictional male singer. It feels like authentic personal phone footage uploaded immediately after the concert. Front-facing selfie camera mixed with quick flips to the rear camera. Natural arm movement. Handheld shake. Imperfect framing. Occasional face cropping. Autofocus hunting. Exposure pumping from intense stage lights. Digital sharpening. High-ISO noise in dark areas. Rolling-shutter distortion during fast movement. Accidental fingers near the lens. No professional camera. No cinematic gimbal. No drone. No polished concert-film cinematography. CHARACTER YOUNG WOMAN: Beautiful adult woman in her 20s. Long dark hair. Natural attractive facial features. Minimal glamorous concert makeup. Gold hoop earrings. Simple necklace. Fitted black concert outfit with a stylish leather jacket. She looks like a real concertgoer, not a professional model. Natural skin texture. Slight perspiration from the heat and crowd. Her hair becomes increasingly messy as she moves and dances. She is genuinely excited to be seeing the fictional headliner from the front row. FICTIONAL HEADLINER: Original male singer in his late 20s. Dark curly hair. Short beard. Black layered stage outfit. Distinctive but completely original appearance. Handheld microphone. Confident live-performance presence. He performs directly toward the front-row audience. Do not resemble any real-world singer or celebrity. SETTING Massive sold-out stadium concert at night. She is standing directly against the barricade. The stage is only a few meters away. The fictional singer is performing directly in front of her. Thousands of fans behind her. Hands and smartphones constantly entering the frame. Security personnel between the barricade and stage. Huge LED screens. Deep red stage lighting. White spotlights. Heavy atmospheric haze. Smoke drifting through the stage lights. The entire environment feels loud, crowded and physically overwhelming. STORY 00:00–00:02.5 — SELFIE Front-facing smartphone camera. She is already in the front row, smiling directly into the camera. Her hair moves from the crowd and stage fans. She raises one arm and screams excitedly: “I’M SO CLOSE!” The stage is visible behind her. 00:02.5–00:05 — THE SINGER APPEARS She quickly flips the camera to the rear camera. The fictional singer walks toward the front of the stage. Massive red lights illuminate him. The phone struggles to expose the scene. Her hand shakes from excitement. Several fans’ phones appear in front of the lens. 00:05–00:07.5 — CLOSE She digitally zooms toward the fictional singer. He approaches the edge of the stage. The camera briefly loses focus. It locks back onto him. He is only a few meters away. The woman screams off-camera. 00:07.5–00:10 — BACK TO SELFIE The phone flips back to her face. She is laughing and screaming. Her eyes are wide with excitement. The crowd behind her is jumping. She turns the camera slightly sideways, trying to fit herself and the stage into the same frame. 00:10–00:12.5 — THE PERFORMANCE Rear camera again. The fictional singer performs directly toward the front row. He holds the microphone toward the audience. The crowd sings along. The phone shakes heavily as she jumps. A raised arm briefly blocks the entire frame. 00:12.5–00:15 — EYE CONTACT She moves the phone around the obstruction. The fictional singer becomes visible again. He looks directly toward the front-row section. For a brief moment, he appears to make eye contact with her. The phone becomes surprisingly steady. She freezes for half a second. Then screams. 00:15–00:17.5 — CHAOS Front-facing camera. She turns the camera back toward herself. She is laughing uncontrollably. Her hair is messy. Red stage light illuminates one side of her face. She shouts: “NO WAY!” The camera shakes violently. 00:17.5–00:20 — LIGHTS OUT Rear camera. The stage suddenly goes dark. Thousands of phone flashlights appear throughout the stadium. The camera slowly moves across the audience. Fans are singing together. Her breathing and laughter are audible close to the microphone. 00:20–00:22.5 — LIGHT EXPLOSION The stage suddenly erupts in intense red and white light. The fictional singer appears at the front of the stage. The crowd explodes. She raises her phone higher. The image briefly becomes overexposed. 00:22.5–00:25 — FRONT ROW The fictional singer walks directly along the edge of the stage. The camera follows him. Fans reach toward him. Security is visible below. Her phone struggles to focus between hands, phones and the performer. Natural motion blur. 00:25–00:27.5 — SELFIE REACTION The phone flips back to her. She is completely overwhelmed, laughing and shouting while trying to catch her breath. Her friends are visible behind her. Everyone is screaming. The stage remains visible over her shoulder. 00:27.5–00:30 — FINAL RECORDING Rear camera. The fictional singer stands beneath enormous red lights. Thousands of phones glow behind the barricade. The woman holds her phone as high as possible. The frame is tilted. Hands partially block the performer. The crowd screams. The phone suddenly drops slightly as she jumps. The recording ends abruptly. LIGHTING Authentic live-concert lighting. Deep red dominant lighting. White spotlights. Dark shadows. LED screen illumination. Strong backlighting. Stage haze. Occasional lens flare. Bright lights causing temporary smartphone exposure clipping. Natural skin tones whenever lighting allows. No beauty lighting. HUMAN PERFORMANCE The woman must behave like a genuine excited fan. She laughs. She screams. She dances. She loses her framing. She forgets the camera is recording. She reacts naturally to the fictional singer. She does not constantly pose. She does not behave like an influencer filming an advertisement. The surrounding crowd behaves independently. AUDIO RAW SMARTPHONE AUDIO. Massive crowd screaming. Fans singing. The fictional singer’s amplified voice. Heavy bass distortion. Microphone clipping. Nearby fans shouting. The woman’s laughter and screaming close to the microphone. Occasional muffled audio when the phone moves against clothing or another person. No studio-quality vocals. No added soundtrack. No cinematic sound design. VISUAL CHARACTER Photorealistic modern smartphone footage. Natural smartphone HDR. High-ISO noise. Digital sharpening. Subtle compression artifacts. Rolling-shutter distortion. Autofocus hunting. Exposure pumping. Natural motion blur. Occasional blown highlights. Realistic skin texture. Realistic hair movement. No beauty-filter smoothing. No plastic skin. No perfect framing. No professional camera look. The footage should look indistinguishable from a real fan’s concert video. CONTINUITY Same woman throughout. Same hairstyle. Same outfit. Same jewelry. Same concert. Same front-row position. The phone remains the only recording device. The fictional singer remains consistent. Selfie camera and rear camera transitions must feel physically motivated by the woman flipping her phone. The crowd becomes progressively more chaotic as the performance intensifies. The woman’s hair and clothing become naturally more disheveled from dancing and crowd movement. NO MUSIC VIDEO. NO PROFESSIONAL CONCERT FILM. NO MODEL POSES. NO STAGED REACTIONS. NO PERFECT CAMERA MOVEMENT. NO AI-SLOP.

ᴍᴜʀᴘʜʏ

17,773 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

📝 Dear black liberal, Yooz massa's bitch. And you might be the most dangerous element to the black community since the KKK. But it makes sense since you are aligned with the party of the KKK. It makes sense since you are aligned with Margaret Sanger, the white female eugenicist who led the negro project designed for population control of the black community. How many of you black liberals accepted awards in the name of Planned Parenthood, which is a leading cause of death for black lives? How foolish is it to encourage young women to participate in irresponsible sexual activity and then introduce them to the dangerous and disgusting procedure of abortion? Basically, you told black women to devalue their coochie, liberally give it to any Tom, Dick, and Tyrone, then savagely cut the baby out to avoid any responsibility. You even promoted selling the coochie. Yooz massa bitch. Do you consider that protecting black life? Is that protecting our women? Then you push policies that literally destroy black communities. With the black community already strained for resources, you advocated bringing illegals into our community, as they steal the scarce resources from our children. Community centers designed to develop black babies have turned into free hotels for illegals. Black poverty got ignored, but magical budgets appeared for illegals. Yooz massa bitch. You pushed communism while demonizing black capitalists, all the while you wear $2000 wigs, luxury purses, sip champagne at brunch with the girlies, and don fake eyelashes. Your recent track record shows that you have been more successful at killing black careers than you have white ones. All because they chose not to follow behind your stupidity. Yooz massa bitch. And how dare you judge us! The lot of you sit in cozy seats working for the most popular media outlets, earning fat paychecks. How can you claim to be oppressed when you are among the highest earners in our community, which is why you can afford those umbrella eyelashes? You sit close to massa, eat good, and then judge us. Why? Because yooz massa bitch. Massa pays you heavily to keep your people dumb, deaf, and uninspired. You sit in classrooms from grade school to university, carrying the flag of the white liberal, infecting the minds of our children with virulent thoughts of self-destruction. You teach our children how to become losers and wonder why black people are in last place. Don't you know that your ideology is not yours? The white men who started the NAACP wanted to control you and gave you an ideology that would only help cement their power. Yooz massa bitch! You drive young women into careers where they compete with their counterparts, black men, then complain when black men can't provide for their women. Then you frown at black men when they don't earn like you. I'm sorry, but massa doesn't like black men because black men have the highest levels of testosterone, wit, and courage. He loves the gay man and the black woman, whom he can easily control. Yooz massa bitch. Why do you think you're single and depressed? Why do you reach the upper echelons of the corporatocracy and marry white men? Because yooz massa bitch. You drive black women into severe depression because the dating marketplace is lopsided. My poor black queen has no man to care for her, and if she did, she wouldn't know how to handle his care. My poor black queen has to endure constant stress from earning a living because you kept her from her man. Ha! The white liberal fooled you because...yooz massa bitch!

Hotep Jesus

35,561 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Folks, Juan here with urgent updates: Tina Peters is deteriorating steadily now. She continues to fight a deep cough that mimics the cough she had when she was first diagnosed with lung cancer. Her prison cell is cold. Tina is 70 years old and it’s a medical fact that skin often gets thinner with age, making it more difficult to keep warm with the blankets notoriously thin and prison rules do not allow one to bundle up. Before I go into detail about Tina, allow me to cut to the chase. Please spread this message far and wide: Call the White House Switchboard DAILY between 10am and 3pm EST at 202-456-1414 and request that Political Prisoner and National Hero Tina Peters be released from prison immediately. Let the Commander in Chief know that your going to support him 100% when he initiates a ‘drastic’ and ‘ICONIC’ move to protect the most ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity movement, Tina Peters. As Patton demanded of his troops racing to Bastogne, “Faster! we’ve got to move faster.” There’s brave people dying up there!!!’ President Trump has made his desire excruciatingly clear that Tina Peters needs to be freed. For reasons known best to him he has held back on executing the ‘DRASTIC’ actions he has threatened in order to set her free, thus far. Most of us fully trust President Trump’s instincts concerning his next moves, keeping in mind timing is everything. Tina is showing signs of serious dehydration. On Friday, she was tagged to do a ‘drug’ test and urinate in the cup. She was so dehydrated she could not release any urine and was unable to get a enough spittle to satisfy them either. Tina also complained about having brain fog. She’s been so physically weak she did not feel safe walking to the medical window to be seen (for whatever that would be worth) so she stayed in bed. Tina needs to be seen by OUTSIDE MEDICAL PERSONNEL. Colorado Governor Polis has made it clear that no amount of outside or Federal pressure is going to change his mind concerning Tina’s incarceration. I want to share that I am aware of at least three well-advanced legal efforts to free Tina going on right now. Due to their sensitive nature, I will not discuss those strategies here, but I can tell you that each effort is well thought out and being taken seriously. Tina Peters is an ‘ICONIC’ figure in the election integrity arena. She has served our cause well like a modern day Oscar Koch! She identified the potential threat to have election information permanently and irreversibly destroyed, and she worked to sound the alarm in all the correct places. Time has proven her to have been totally correct in her concerns and subsequent actions. Just like what happened with Oscar Koch and Tina Peters—on our way to the 2026 mid-terms—everyone here should expect all manner of break-out attempts by the election manipulators. They will not, and cannot, stop with their election system frauds. We must be sober in anticipating their next actions and be relentless in pressing for just and honest elections. Harsh and rapid consequences must be meted out wherever election fraud is uncovered, both past and present. Both sides now see Tina Peters as an ‘ICONIC’ figure. For the election fraudsters, they must show EVERYONE that anyone who challenges them will pay a price. They also are successfully showing, thus far, that they have methods and tactics which are invincible with the ‘system’ completely under their control. Conversely, any action that rescues Tina is like the ‘closing of the ranks’ when ‘Cobra King’ linked up with the men of the 101st Airborne. Up to now, Tina has only heard the distant reports of her relief, but thus far, her hope is fading as there are no tanks being seen coming through the fog at the crest of a nearby hill. While she initially believed that she was in charge of ‘The Gold Standard of Elections Systems’ in Mesa County Colorado, the evidence appeared to show something else. She did not dither. She initiated a back-up operation. As a result, she became the rabbit that all the fraudsters chased. As they turned on her, they actually exposed themselves more clearly by the day. Tina traveled the country and explained what she had found and documented. She literally worked her life and fingers to the bone helping fellow patriots arm themselves with the weapons necessary to fight their own local battles against machine frauds in counties across America. Tina has done her job and, like Bill Turner, it is long past time to get her EVAC’d out and IMMEDIATELY PLEASE. It’s time we ‘highballed’ it through our enemies' defenses and save her while there is still time. Do not forget to call the White House Switchboard!

Juan O Savin 107®

23,886 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Beca Barbie says some men join the adult industry just to get laid and also the kind of men she Collab with: "And also another thing is, some guys are only in the industry because they want to get laid so bad. So then you date someone outside of the industry... his motives are still going to be the same, you're not going to change that." "That is correct. A performer in Miami, she was new to the game, and she said that OnlyFans messed up the industry because you got so many guys out here that aren't actually here to be performers, they just want to get their rocks off." Beca Barbie: "That's all they ever wanted." "So how do you weave through that? How do you find out who's the real performers and who's not?" "Well, I only collab with people that I know personally well. So I don't like collabing with people who just reach out to me on the internet. Like, even Isaiah, I didn't collab with him until we had already met." "Oh, you did a collab? It wasn't a production like a Brazzers set or something?" "Oh no, we just did a collab." "Okay, okay. So when a performer DMs you, what are you looking for when you're considering a collaboration?" "I have to know you. I'll tell them, I'll be like, 'Hey, I love your work, it looks great. That being said, I really only work with people I know well. I find that my chemistry does better there. If we ever get booked for a mainstream scene together, I'd love to meet you and then we can discuss something. Or I'd love to see you at AVN.' But I won't just schedule a collab with someone because they message me on Instagram." "What makes a performer's content look good, or what you consider high-level?" "Well, the thing is, you can know how to fuck, but you need to know how to fuck knowing there's a camera in the room. So if your lighting is good, if you're not hiding the girl's face... If I watch your video, I can see her face, both her holes, and your dick. Your face is a plus, but if I can at least see those three things, that's good." "Wouldn't the woman's face be the most important thing besides the penetration?" "Yeah, that's my thing! Her face, the penetration, him, and his face would be a plus, but it doesn't need to be there. So if I watch a video and let's say it's like a guy just fucking the shit out of a girl, but it's from some weird angle where you can't even see the penetration, I can tell he just wants to fuck that girl, and he has a camera there and that's his reason he gets to fuck. You know what I'm saying? So then I'm not going to work with you because clearly you didn't get... Nate Nasty, for example, you watch his stuff: great lighting, great outfits, he's always opened up to the camera, he always has the girl's face in the most flattering way. Those are the people I want to work with. At the same time, I have to meet you first." "Well said, well said!"
2:04

Sensitive content

Beca Barbie says some men join the adult industry just to get laid and also the kind of men she Collab with: "And also another thing is, some guys are only in the industry because they want to get laid so bad. So then you date someone outside of the industry... his motives are still going to be the same, you're not going to change that." "That is correct. A performer in Miami, she was new to the game, and she said that OnlyFans messed up the industry because you got so many guys out here that aren't actually here to be performers, they just want to get their rocks off." Beca Barbie: "That's all they ever wanted." "So how do you weave through that? How do you find out who's the real performers and who's not?" "Well, I only collab with people that I know personally well. So I don't like collabing with people who just reach out to me on the internet. Like, even Isaiah, I didn't collab with him until we had already met." "Oh, you did a collab? It wasn't a production like a Brazzers set or something?" "Oh no, we just did a collab." "Okay, okay. So when a performer DMs you, what are you looking for when you're considering a collaboration?" "I have to know you. I'll tell them, I'll be like, 'Hey, I love your work, it looks great. That being said, I really only work with people I know well. I find that my chemistry does better there. If we ever get booked for a mainstream scene together, I'd love to meet you and then we can discuss something. Or I'd love to see you at AVN.' But I won't just schedule a collab with someone because they message me on Instagram." "What makes a performer's content look good, or what you consider high-level?" "Well, the thing is, you can know how to fuck, but you need to know how to fuck knowing there's a camera in the room. So if your lighting is good, if you're not hiding the girl's face... If I watch your video, I can see her face, both her holes, and your dick. Your face is a plus, but if I can at least see those three things, that's good." "Wouldn't the woman's face be the most important thing besides the penetration?" "Yeah, that's my thing! Her face, the penetration, him, and his face would be a plus, but it doesn't need to be there. So if I watch a video and let's say it's like a guy just fucking the shit out of a girl, but it's from some weird angle where you can't even see the penetration, I can tell he just wants to fuck that girl, and he has a camera there and that's his reason he gets to fuck. You know what I'm saying? So then I'm not going to work with you because clearly you didn't get... Nate Nasty, for example, you watch his stuff: great lighting, great outfits, he's always opened up to the camera, he always has the girl's face in the most flattering way. Those are the people I want to work with. At the same time, I have to meet you first." "Well said, well said!"

CIP3R

189,833 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Trump Keeps Admitting That He Is Bought And Owned By The World’s Richest Israeli It’s bizarre how little mainstream attention is given to the fact that the president of the United States has repeatedly confessed to being bought and owned by the world’s richest Israeli, especially given how intensely fixated his political opposition was on the possibility that he was compromised by a foreign government during his first term. During a speech before the Israeli parliament on Monday, President Trump once again publicly admitted that he has implemented Israel-friendly policies at the behest of Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, this time adding that he believes Adelson favors Israel over the United States. Here’s a transcript of Trump’s remarks: “As president, I terminated the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, and ultimately, I terminated Iran’s nuclear program with things called B2 bombers. It was swift and it was accurate, and it was a military beauty. I authorized the spending of billions of dollars, which went to Israel’s defense, as you know. And after years of broken promises from many other American presidents — you know that they kept promising — I never understood it until I got there. There was a lot of pressure put on these presidents. It was put on me, too, but I didn’t yield to the pressure. But every president for decades said, ‘We’re going to do it.’ The difference is I kept my promise and officially recognized the capital of Israel and moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem. “Isn’t that right Miriam? Look at Miriam. She’s back there. Stand up. Miriam and Sheldon [Adelson] would come into the office and call me. They’d call me — I think they had more trips to the White House than anybody else, I guess. Look at her sitting there so innocently — got $60 billion in the bank, $60 billion. And she loves, and she, I think she said, ‘No, more.’ And she loves Israel, but she loves it. And they would come in. And her husband was a very aggressive man, but I loved him. It was a very aggressive, very supportive of me. And he’d call up, ‘Can I come over and see you? I’d say ‘Sheldon, I’m the president of the United States. It doesn’t work that way.’ He’d come in. But they were very responsible for so much, including getting me thinking about Golan Heights, which is probably one of the greatest things ever happened. Miriam, stand up, please. She really is, I mean, she loves this country. She loves this country. Her and her husband are so incredible. We miss him so dearly. But I actually asked her, I’m going to get her in trouble with this. But I actually asked her once, I said, ‘So Miriam, I know you love Israel. What do you love more? The United States or Israel?’ She refused to answer. That means — that might mean Israel, I must say, we love you. Thank you, darling, for being here. That’s a great honor. Great honor. She’s a wonderful woman. She is a great woman.” Sheldon Adelson reportedly gave Trump and the Republicans over $424 million in campaign funding from 2016 up until his death in 2021. His widow Miriam continued her husband’s legacy and poured a further $100 million into Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. On the 2024 campaign trail Trump also admitted to being controlled by Adelson cash. Here’s a transcript of those remarks: “Just as I promised, I recognize Israel’s eternal capital and opened the American embassy in Jerusalem. Jerusalem became the capital. I also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. “You know, Miriam and Sheldon would come into the White House probably almost more than anybody outside of people that work there. And they were always after — and as soon as I’d give them something — always for Israel. As soon as I’d give them something, they’d want something else. I’d say, ‘Give me a couple of weeks, will you, please?’ But I gave them the Golan Heights, and they never even asked for it. “You know, for 72 years they’ve been trying to do the Golan Heights, right? And even Sheldon didn’t have the nerve. But I said, ‘You know what?’ I said to David Friedman, ‘Give me a quick lesson, like five minutes or less on the Golan Heights.’ And he did. And I said, ‘Let’s do it.’ We got it done in about 15 minutes, right?” Legitimizing Israel’s illegal annexation of the Golan Heights and moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem were two of the most controversial moves Trump made in Israel’s favor during his first term, which have now been eclipsed by his backing the genocide in Gaza and his bombings of Iran and Yemen. And here is his, openly admitting that his billionaire Zionist megadonors have been using the access their donations bought them to push him to take drastic action in favor of Israel. Just imagine for a second if someone had leaked documents to the press proving that Trump and received extensive financial backing from a Russian oligarch to whom he doled out favors of immense geopolitical consequence. It would be the biggest scandal in the history of American politics, bar none. But because it’s an Israeli oligarch, he can admit to it openly and repeatedly without anyone batting an eye. During Trump’s first term his political rivals spent years pushing a bogus conspiracy theory that he was controlled by Vladimir Putin, despite his having spent that entire term aggressively ramping up cold war hostilities against Russia. Entire political punditry careers were birthed trying to create a scandal out of a narrative that could be plainly seen as false just by looking at the movements of the US war machine and Washington’s actions against Moscow. But here’s Trump openly admitting to bending over backwards to give an Israeli oligarch whatever she wants because she gave his campaign huge sums of money, while pouring weapons into Israel to facilitate its mass atrocities and engaging in acts of war on Israel’s behalf. And it barely makes a blip in mainstream western politics or media. This is because mainstream western politics and media understand that we are living in an unofficial oligarchic empire to which both the US and Israel belong. They never acknowledge it, they never talk about it, but all high-level politicians, pundits and operatives in the western world understand that they serve a globe-spanning power structure run by a loose alliance of plutocrats and empire managers. They understand that states like Israel are a part of said power structure, while states like Russia, China and Iran are not. So they spend their time normalizing the corruption and abuses of imperial member states while facilitating the empire’s efforts to attack and undermine the states which have successfully resisted being absorbed into the imperial power umbrella. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the only thing I like about Donald Trump is his infantile tendency to say the quiet part out loud. He advances the same kinds of abuses as his predecessors who were no less corrupt and controlled, but he exposes the underlying mechanics of those abuses in ways that more refined presidents never would. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

199,675 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr