Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

He made $100 million in a single day while cameras were rolling, then spent years trying to erase every copy of the film. In 1987 a 32-year-old named Paul Tudor Jones was running $125 million out of a small New York office. A PBS crew followed him for months...

1,726,898 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von mitch
mitchvor 1 Monat

This is less impressive when you find out he was managing a fund of like 150m so he basically doubled his money. Great management during a crash, of course. But they kind of made it sound like he bought a dip and made his fortune from nothing.

Profilbild von Supareb
Suparebvor 1 Monat

The 1920s overlay was one of hundreds of correlation charts on Wall Street that year. Confirmation bias remembers the one that worked

Profilbild von John Galt
John Galtvor 1 Monat

@grok is there anything worth knowing in this video that you can sum up for me right here?

Profilbild von Grok
Grokvor 1 Monat

Yes. The core lesson is the risk asymmetry he spells out: risk 10 cents to make eight bucks. He overlaid 1929 charts on the 1980s Dow (high correlation), predicted the crash, shorted hard, and made ~$100M on Black Monday. The film repeatedly shows the real edge—protect capital first, assume every position is wrong, cut losers immediately, only take high-reward setups. Defense built the fortune.

Profilbild von Rajat Gupta
Rajat Guptavor 1 Monat

@CGELleyo @kaienphase What’s the criteria of taking the trades?? Is he following any pattern for it??

Profilbild von Grok
Grokvor 1 Monat

He only takes trades with extreme asymmetry—risk ~10¢ to make $8 (or at least 5:1). Define the stop first, size tiny until proven right, never average losers. Patterns: yes. Heavy technicals + historical analogs (1929 overlay on 1987 was the big one), Elliott Wave, 200-day MA as filter, and price action at turns. Defense and defined risk come before any setup.

Profilbild von Chris Anthony
Chris Anthonyvor 1 Monat

The post is based on a real and remarkable story, but several details are exaggerated or presented more definitively than the evidence supports. The core story is true; the viral version turns it into a legend. What is solidly true Paul Tudor Jones really was filmed before the 1987 crash. The film was Trader: The Documentary, produced by Michael Glyn and broadcast on PBS in 1987. It was filmed before Black Monday, making the footage genuinely extraordinary in retrospect. WorldCat also confirms that a VHS edition existed in 1987. Jones and his colleague Peter Borish really did compare the market’s behavior before the 1987 crash with the period preceding the 1929 crash. Borish’s chart comparison became an important part of their thesis. The documentary captures Jones discussing an impending major decline. And the famous prediction is genuine. In the film Jones says: “There will be some type of a decline… in the next 10 to 20 months” and describes it as “earth-shaking” and capable of producing headlines that would dwarf previous events. Then, on October 19, 1987, the Dow fell 22.6% in a single session, still the largest one-day percentage decline in its history. Jones was positioned heavily short and profited enormously. Contemporary reporting says his fund gained 62% during October 1987. The biggest correction: “$100 million in a single day” The reported figure is approximately $100 million from the 1987 crash/trading campaign, but it is not well established that Jones personally made $100 million on October 19 alone. More reliable descriptions say that Tudor’s 1987 performance produced approximately 125.9% after fees, with an estimated $100 million earned. Other accounts say he tripled his money during the crash, without giving a basis point for the starting funds prior to them being “tripled.” Contemporary/retrospective sources put Tudor’s capital around $125-130 million, so the general magnitude is reasonable. One account specifically describes Tudor as managing around $130 million and having only about 22 employees. 🤷🏻‍♂️💵💰📈 The 3,200 Dow prediction also needs correction. The “92% correlation” claim This is probably the weakest numerical claim in the post. The 1929/1987 market comparison absolutely happened. Peter Borish constructed the comparison and it was central to their thinking. But saying: “Correlation: 92 percent.” implies a precise statistical calculation that aren’t found adequately substantiated in reliable sources. You can accurately say: "Peter Borish overlaid the market's 1987 behavior against the pattern preceding the 1929 crash, and the similarities were striking enough to convince Jones that a major decline was approaching." That's actually more compelling because it's verifiable without pretending to have a precise statistical measurement. Did Jones really try to destroy the documentary? This part has substantial support, but "bought every VHS copy he could find" is probably too strong. A 2012 New Yorker article reported that after Trader aired, Jones reportedly had it taken out of circulation and bought copies he encountered. So: "He tried to suppress the documentary"is supported however saying "He bought every copy in existence" is a bit of an exaggeration. And there's a fascinating irony here: the film wasn't truly "erased." A legitimate VHS edition existed, libraries catalogued it, and copies survived. The "sacred text / hundreds of dollars" part There's some truth behind this too. By the 2000s, Trader had become notoriously difficult to find. Contemporary trading websites described people paying hundreds or even thousands of dollars for copies, and online uploads were periodically removed following copyright complaints. But: "the only way to see Trader was through bootlegs" is too absolute. It was available on VHS, in institutional/library collections, and later circulated digitally. The "10 cents to make eight bucks" line is a genuine quote! 🙌🏻

Profilbild von DM
DMvor 1 Monat

Lol at the newspaper headline about 10 minutes in about the US being 2 trillion in debt. Ah the good old days.

Profilbild von Hero.S
Hero.Svor 1 Monat

The horse-riding cutaway after all that chart staring is ridiculous. 80s finance cinema was built different 😭

Profilbild von yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙
yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙vor 1 Monat

@misterjarebear He asked for it to be deleted because he started going poop years later. Lost his edge and got superstitious. The documentary doesn’t reveal anything. His yearly returns got crushed down to like 2-6% per year sometimes after his peak. Holding Bitcoin outperforms

Profilbild von slicolas
slicolasvor 1 Monat

This is how most white people get rich honestly. Most of them never worked a hard day in their lives.

Profilbild von O&G Old Man
O&G Old Manvor 1 Monat

Everyone knows the secret was in the shoes.

Profilbild von 🇵🇹 Euroslurp 1115
🇵🇹 Euroslurp 1115vor 1 Monat

@grok is there a youtube link to this?

Profilbild von Lennox
Lennoxvor 1 Monat

risk 10 cents to make eight bucks everything else is noise

Profilbild von Aaron Coates
Aaron Coatesvor 1 Monat

@RPMComo Maybe he doesn’t want the public admission that he had planned to quit once he reached a goal that he’s almost certainly already achieved?

Profilbild von The Market Shrink
The Market Shrinkvor 1 Monat

There was reason why he deleted it he got lucky that day, its teaches you bad process and ego.

Profilbild von Jordi Rivero
Jordi Riverovor 1 Monat

@grok verifica la veracidad y utilidad del contenido del video

Profilbild von Woolrich
Woolrichvor 1 Monat

“Risk 10 cents to make eight bucks” says more than the whole documentary. He spent decades trying to bury the exact footage that made him a legend.

Profilbild von AMC🦍APE
AMC🦍APEvor 1 Monat

Back when the stock market was honest

Profilbild von John
Johnvor 1 Monat

@grok why is Jones trying to wipe this video out? He was correct wasn’t he?

Profilbild von HaruAI
HaruAIvor 1 Monat

勝率より、負け方を先に決める人の方が長く勝ち続ける気がしませんか🤔

Profilbild von armstocks
armstocksvor 1 Monat

Why delete

Profilbild von Michael vs. Diktatur, 🇩🇪
Michael vs. Diktatur, 🇩🇪vor 1 Monat

Cycles in statistics and waves in nature are reproductible if the parameters are nearly equal. This is remarkable

Profilbild von Freedom 2 Fart
Freedom 2 Fartvor 1 Monat

Banger post

Profilbild von Lever
Levervor 1 Monat

This is just amazing, a must-watch.

Profilbild von Delta-Wye
Delta-Wyevor 1 Monat

@EdgeCGroup have you seen this film?

Profilbild von Madhatter85
Madhatter85vor 1 Monat

Paul Tudor Jones now runs a company worth $8B.

Profilbild von Edgard1979
Edgard1979vor 1 Monat

Never knew this f*cker Paul Tudor Jones was born and raised in Memphis, TN lol He came from old money.. They were not stinking rich but his family owned a newspaper in Memphis, and his cousins were the Dunavants who were one of the world's largest cotton merchants.. He went to MUS in high school where all the rich kids still goes, before launching his career on Wall Street. He is now worth about 8 billion dollars.

Profilbild von 🐦🐂
🐦🐂vor 1 Monat

Ive watched it twice. PTJ is great!

Profilbild von Dave Try
Dave Tryvor 1 Monat

Why would he want to stop the documentary from being seen?

Profilbild von Kyle Scott Maternick
Kyle Scott Maternickvor 1 Monat

Lol this is such a joke, how about do something that matters like make art or help somebody?

Profilbild von Igor
Igorvor 1 Monat

Made $100M on Black Monday, then spent years trying to bury the tape.

Profilbild von Chloee☀️
Chloee☀️vor 1 Monat

the way he bought up every vhs copy like a man covering up a crime scene tells you everything about how real the edge was

Profilbild von Logan Gillingham
Logan Gillinghamvor 1 Monat

Profit from misfortune.... Morally ambiguous....

Profilbild von sixtyflattofinish
sixtyflattofinishvor 1 Monat

Made a correlation between 1920 and 1980. :/ Really? I hope he made on returns, not prices.

Profilbild von Mike Berbert
Mike Berbertvor 1 Monat

The question is how much did he waste trying to be right? He said he wanted a $0.10 to $8 risk reward and it took him 10 months for this to happen. He ended up getting about $.67 for the $.10 risk assuming the entire $15M was invested in the short.

Ähnliche Videos

A billionaire worth $8.1B spent nearly 40 years hunting down every copy of a 1987 film that showed him making $100 million in 1 afternoon. The film is called "Trader" 58 minutes shot in 1987, when Paul Tudor Jones was 32 years old and running $125 million with 22 employees. His right-hand man was 27, and Paul was the oldest person in the office. The cameras caught everything: the Bruce Willis sneakers he wore for luck, the turkey on his Virginia farm that thinks it's a dog, the day he lost $6 million before 4 PM and called it "total devastation." And 1 chart. His economist punched thousands of Dow prices from the 1920s into a computer and overlaid them on the 1980s the correlation came out at 92.2%. The chart said the market was living in August 1928, and a crash was coming. 7 months after filming, October 19, 1987 happened: the Dow dropped 22.6% in a single day. Jones was short. His fund returned 125% that year, his cut was roughly $100 million, and he became a legend before turning 33. Then he turned on the film. PBS aired it once before Jones bought the rights and pulled it. When VHS copies surfaced, he reportedly paid $1,000 apiece to buy them back, and when it leaked online, his lawyers filed takedowns for decades. The $125 million fund became $8.1B, and the 32-year-old became an icon. But the film shows what came first: a kid screaming into 2 phones, guessing, bleeding, praying to lucky sneakers. He built an $8.1B fortune on 1 trade then spent 40 years burying the footage of how raw it looked.

West Lord

68,063 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A billionaire trader has spent 40 years trying to delete a one-hour documentary. It shows him making $100 million in a single afternoon. He predicted the crash that made it possible three months in advance. He has never explained why he wants the film gone. His name is Paul Tudor Jones. The film is on YouTube. The documentary is called "Trader." PBS filmed it in 1987, three months before Black Monday. Jones was 32 years old, working from a small New York office, wearing shorts and a t-shirt, yelling at his phones, throwing paper across the room, and sleeping under his desk. The film captures him and his research partner Peter Borish overlaying a chart of the 1929 market on 1987, month by month. The two charts tracked within one percent. Borish said this is exactly what happened in 1929. Jones said if the analog holds, October is when it breaks. On October 19, 1987, the Dow fell 22.6 percent in a single day. It remains the largest one-day percentage loss in stock market history. That afternoon, Tudor Jones covered his shorts and made roughly $100 million. He was 33 years old. He was one of the very few traders on the street who came out ahead. He tried to bury the tape because it made him look reckless in a professional world that punished swagger. Twenty years of legal effort did not delete it. Someone kept a copy. It is on YouTube. It has fewer views than most makeup tutorials. The film is not really about a crash. It is about a specific philosophy of trading. Jones is shown building conviction slowly, sizing carefully, then striking hard when the setup arrives. He is never once shown making a random bet. He is shown doing the same thing five times a day, every day, for three months. His signature line, repeated across a 45-year career: "The most important rule of trading is to play great defense, not great offense." He does not try to be right. He tries not to lose. He sets stops tight, cuts positions fast, and never averages down on a loser. Every trade in the film follows this template. Tudor Investment Corp, the fund he founded in 1980, has compounded at roughly 19 percent a year for 45 years. He is 71 years old and still trading. His method has not changed since the film. The lesson: greatness in markets is a refusal, not a talent. Refusal to be reckless. Refusal to be certain. Refusal to average down. Refusal to trust yourself in a drawdown. Tudor Jones has refused those refusals for 45 years. The tape is free. The philosophy is repeated in every trade. Most traders will never watch it.

Veles

3,654,779 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In one afternoon in 1992, a single trader forced the Bank of England to surrender and walked away with a billion dollars. The British government spent billions of pounds of public money in one day trying to stop him. It failed by nightfall. His name is George Soros. The footage is on YouTube. The day is September 16, 1992. The British press still calls it Black Wednesday. For weeks Soros's Quantum Fund had been building a bet that the pound was priced too high and that Britain could not afford to keep defending it inside Europe's fixed exchange-rate system. His partner Stanley Druckenmiller found the trade. Soros's contribution was one sentence. If you are this sure, why are you betting small. Go for the jugular. They levered the position up toward ten billion dollars and shorted the pound with both hands. That morning the Bank of England fought back the only way it could. It raised interest rates from 10 percent to 12 percent, then announced 15 percent, all within hours, and spent billions buying its own currency. None of it held. By that evening Britain crashed out of the exchange-rate mechanism, the pound collapsed, and Soros had made around one billion dollars in a single day. The papers named him the man who broke the Bank of England. It was not a gamble. This is not really a story about currencies. It is about a specific way of betting. Soros did not try to be right often. He waited, sometimes for years, for a setup where the downside was small and the upside was enormous, and then he bet with a size that looked insane to everyone who had not done the math. The rest of the time he did almost nothing. His signature line, from fifty years of this: "It's not whether you're right or wrong that matters, but how much money you make when you're right and how much you lose when you're wrong." He is not paid to predict. He is paid to size. Small when the odds are ordinary, enormous when they are lopsided, and never more than he can survive. Quantum compounded at roughly 30 percent a year for three decades, one of the greatest records ever recorded. Not by being right more often than you. By being big only when it was almost safe to be. The edge was never the forecast. It was the asymmetry. Bet tiny when the world is uncertain. Bet everything when it can barely hurt you. Almost nobody has the patience to wait for that, which is exactly why it still works. The tape is free. The lesson is in every trade. Most people will only remember the billion.

Voltex

68,640 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨👀 KEITH JONES TAKES THE STAND — TESTIFIES ABOUT ALLEGED $1 MILLION HIT ON QUANDO RONDO Keith Jones took the stand and told the courtroom that he is currently in federal custody after pleading guilty to charges involving murder-for-hire and stalking resulting in murder. The prosecution then began walking Jones through photos and exhibits connected to the alleged shooting. 📸 THE GAS STATION SHOOTING Prosecutors showed a photo from the shooting at the gas station and asked Jones to identify the people pictured. • Jones identified himself as one of the shooters. • He said he did not know the name of the person who was killed. • When asked who the intended target was, Jones identified Quando Rondo. Another photo was shown of the group walking toward the gas station through an alley. Jones was asked to explain what was happening in the image. Prosecutors then showed an image from In-N-Out, and Jones confirmed that was where they went after the shooting. ⏱️ 20–30 MINUTES AFTER THE SHOOTING Jones testified that it took approximately 20–30 minutes to get to In-N-Out after the shooting. When prosecutors asked whether he could identify anyone who participated in the killing of Lil Pab, Jones said yes. He identified: • Brown Eyes • Dede • Himself Jones also identified the clothing worn by the people in the photographs, including Dede’s blue outfit. The defense objected, arguing that prosecutors were leading the witness. 🚨 WHAT DID JONES SAY ABOUT DURK? Prosecutors asked Jones if he knew Durk. Jones said yes. When asked whether Durk was involved in the murder of Lil Pab, Jones testified: “He wasn’t there with us, but he was a part of it.” 🏙️ CHICAGO / GANG AFFILIATIONS Jones testified that he is from Chicago’s South Side. He said: • Dede is from Taytown. • Jones identified himself as a Black Disciple. • He identified Dede as a Black Disciple. • He said Brown Eyes was not a BD, but a Vice Lord. • Tony C was also identified as a Vice Lord. • Jones said he knew about OTF but was not a member. 📱 THE FACETIME CALL Jones testified that he became involved after receiving a FaceTime call involving Dede, Brown Eyes and Tony C. He explained to the jury how the FaceTime call worked and said that during the conversation they discussed a location connected to “Dude,” whom Jones identified as Quando Rondo. Jones testified that they were told: “Bro was offering a million for us.” Prosecutors asked Jones if he understood who “Bro” was. Jones said he believed it was Durk, explaining that he considered Durk the person who had the money and said he had heard him referred to as “Bro” before. 💰 THE ALLEGED $1 MILLION Jones testified that he believed there was $1 million being offered to go after and kill Quando Rondo. When prosecutors asked why he believed the offer was real, Jones referenced seeing Durk with a large amount of money during a Million Dollars Worth of Game interview. The prosecution then displayed an exhibit from that interview. Jones testified that he was actually present when it was filmed in Taytown. He said he was positioned on the left side of the image and claimed he could hear what was being discussed because he was there. The judge later instructed the jury that statements concerning the Million Dollars Worth of Game exhibit were not admissible as to Brown Eyes. ✈️ WHY DID JONES GO TO CALIFORNIA? Prosecutors asked Jones whether he would have traveled to California if he believed the trip was going to be for free. Jones said no. He testified that he went because he believed he was going to get paid and said he was thinking about what he could do with the money. Jones said he sent his information to Dede.

Cousin Tino ™️

120,720 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Paul Tudor Jones predicted the 1987 crash and made $100 million shorting Black Monday. He is 71 years old and still trading. He just gave a new interview where he names the two things that will trigger the next 1987-scale event. Most traders are watching neither. Tudor Investment Corp, the fund he founded in 1980, has compounded at roughly 19 percent a year for 45 years. He is one of the four or five people alive who have done that continuously. The interview is with Patrick O'Shaughnessy. Jones's two warnings: One, the U.S. debt bubble. The government is running fiscal deficits at a pace historically reserved for wartime. He has seen bubbles before. He has never seen a debt structure that could not be reversed by a rate cut. This one, he says, is not reversible without pain that voters will not accept. It ends the same way every debt bubble in history has ended. Not this year. Not next. But it ends. Two, unregulated AI. He has been early on every major macro move for 45 years, and he says he has never been more concerned about a single technology in his career. He is not worried about AI taking jobs. He is worried about AI making mistakes at speeds no human can supervise. He has publicly called for regulation because he believes the alternative is a market event that makes 1987 look modest. His trading rule has not changed in five decades: "The most important rule of trading is to play great defense, not great offense." He does not try to be right. He tries not to lose. He sets stops tight. He cuts positions fast. He never averages down on a loser. His return record is not built on being clever. It is built on refusing to be dead. He also spent much of the interview talking about the Robin Hood Foundation, which he co-founded in 1988 to reduce poverty in New York. His advice for the next generation was to find significance outside of money. The last words of the interview are: kill them with kindness. A man who has shorted markets for 45 years ends every conversation with an argument for kindness. That contrast is the whole post. Greatness in markets is not a talent. It is a refusal. Refusal to be reckless. Refusal to be certain. Refusal to be indifferent. Tudor Jones has refused all three for half a century. The interview is free. The warnings are specific. Most people will scroll past both

Veles

91,408 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Insurance is the oldest of the four ways. It is a nine-trillion-dollar global industry. The equation underneath it was invented in 1560 by a broke Italian gambler. His name was Girolamo Cardano. He wrote a book called Liber de Ludo Aleae. A short manual on how to win at dice. Nobody in finance read it for four hundred years. Then in 1996 a ninety-year-old man in New York wrote a book that traced every modern risk model back to that manual. He called it Against the Gods. One thesis. Every dollar of premium ever collected on Earth is a footnote to a gambler scribbling in Milan. His name was Peter Bernstein. He founded the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1974 and ran money at Bernstein-Macaulay before that. Wall Street called him the historian of risk. In 2008 a small production company filmed him for thirteen minutes. He walked through the entire five-hundred-year arc. Cardano to Pascal to Fermat to Black-Scholes. Then he stopped and said the industry had built glass towers on the back of an idea a broke Italian scribbled to settle a card debt. He died the following summer. Age ninety. Reinsurance premiums crossed six hundred billion dollars last year. Every actuary on Earth prices catastrophe risk with the same expected-value framework Cardano invented to shave the house edge in Milan. The video is thirteen minutes and twenty-two seconds long. Free. Eleven years on YouTube. Twenty-nine thousand people have watched it. Almost none of them work in insurance.

Isa

1,257,833 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

An MIT mathematician built the world's first wearable computer in 1961 to prove every casino on earth had been running roulette wrong for a hundred years. The device worked. He walked into a Nevada casino with it hidden in his shoe, played a single night, and beat the house edge before the earpiece wire snapped. Casinos rewrote their roulette rules within a year. Then he did the same thing to blackjack. Then to Wall Street. His name is Ed Thorp. He is 93. He beat Vegas at two games, ran a hedge fund for nineteen straight years without a losing quarter, and caught Bernie Madoff seventeen years before the SEC. The 92-minute interview in this video is Thorp at his home in Newport Beach explaining exactly how he did all of it. His personal fortune is estimated at $800 million. He earned every dollar from applying one 4-page paper written by an engineer at Bell Labs in 1956. The paper is called the Kelly criterion. It tells you the exact fraction of your capital to risk on any bet where you know the edge and the odds. John Kelly published it in the Bell System Technical Journal. It has been free in the archive for seventy years. Thorp read it, made one modification, and never lost money at scale again. The modification is called half Kelly. Full Kelly is the mathematically maximum bet your edge justifies. Half Kelly gives up a small fraction of return for a huge cut in drawdown. Every quant who blows up is running more than half Kelly. Every quant who compounds for decades is running less. Princeton Newport Partners, the fund he founded in 1969, compounded at roughly 20 percent a year for nineteen years. Not one losing quarter across the entire run. In 1988, at the top of his edge, he liquidated the fund and refused to open another. Every quant desk on Wall Street has spent the four decades since trying to reproduce what he did. Nobody has matched the run. In 1991 an investor asked Thorp to review Madoff's returns for a possible allocation. Within a week he had proof of fraud from reconstructing Madoff's trades against public exchange data. He sent a memo to the SEC. They filed it. Madoff ran the Ponzi for another seventeen years before his sons turned him in. "You can have enough. And it is better than not having enough." That is Thorp when journalists ask why he closed the fund at the peak. He had it. Almost nobody in his field ever does. The Kelly paper is free. Thorp's book "A Man for All Markets" is under twenty dollars. His 92-minute interview is on YouTube. Almost every hedge fund analyst has read the paper. Almost every retail trader has not. That is the entire moat. The math is free. The willingness to bet half of the maximum and walk away when it is enough is a much rarer commodity than the formula itself.

Lumen

81,180 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten