Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

He was right all along Two years ago, OpenAI fired Leopold Aschenbrenner for leaking reports that top AI companies are ignoring the safety risks of superintelligence

239,725 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 25

Фото профиля Leopold Stock Tracker
Leopold Stock Tracker5 дней назад

His fund would be on a heater if not for leverage

Фото профиля DpkkpD
DpkkpD5 дней назад

At the most, people will lose jobs and that's it. This is bs and it will turn out to be nothing burger

Фото профиля Biff McTannen
Biff McTannen5 дней назад

Doesn’t his wife work for Anthropic?

Фото профиля Perseus
Perseus4 дней назад

Never trust a guy that who’s obsessed with his hair

Фото профиля Jeheskiel Sunloy
Jeheskiel Sunloy5 дней назад

whistleblowers in tech always get treated like pariahs right up until their predictions become company roadmap

Фото профиля Armani Otto
Armani Otto4 дней назад

Put leo in jail. ..

Фото профиля miura shota
miura shota5 дней назад

OpenAI’s got the right vibe, but who’s paying for the safety? LMAO.

Фото профиля The AI Therapist
The AI Therapist5 дней назад

Aschenburner got fired for safety. openai raised $6b in q1 just to keep the lights on and the cap table flexible. they aren't building agi yet. they're buying time. pressure test over safety suit

Фото профиля CryptoNinjas
CryptoNinjas5 дней назад

It is wild to see his predictions playing out exactly as he described back then.

Фото профиля JonRods
JonRods5 дней назад

He joins a growing list of researchers and executives like Jan Leike and Ilya Sutskever who left OpenAI over deep concerns that safety is being sidelined for speed. Fast forward to today, and their warnings about superintelligence risks are becoming impossible to ignore.

Фото профиля Fidel
Fidel4 дней назад

Where can I watch the full thing

Фото профиля scooby institute
scooby institute4 дней назад

the video hits different when your entire thesis is 4stock:native and vibes

Фото профиля Jeremy Bond
Jeremy Bond4 дней назад

Good Christ, when is this thing going to get some traction?

Фото профиля Macro Bombastic
Macro Bombastic5 дней назад

yeah and two years later the market still prices AI like it’s risk-free, wild

Фото профиля Michael Waitze
Michael Waitze5 дней назад

The safety concerns regarding the race toward superintelligence are becoming a very real conversation. We actually went deeper on this here:

Фото профиля Be Divergent
Be Divergent4 дней назад

Love that nerd Leo 🤓

Фото профиля Patrick Sherman
Patrick Sherman3 дней назад

When did we start thinking stupid people are smart ones. Remember this guy blew up a hedge fund in three weeks.

Фото профиля Whale Alpha
Whale Alpha5 дней назад

I agree

Фото профиля Finance Wisdom
Finance Wisdom5 дней назад

Safety reports matter; leaking them undermines accountability and trust.

Фото профиля Ana Watson
Ana Watson4 дней назад

OpenAI terminating an employee for leaking safety-related reports shows how companies prioritize PR over long-term risk. I ignored system safety to save cash in my business once, and fixing the mess cost me double.

Фото профиля notgwapo
notgwapo4 дней назад

crazy that he got the boot for keeping it real. wonder if folks are starting to pay attention now. 💀

Фото профиля Anonymous MAGA
Anonymous MAGA5 дней назад

Maybe he should have taken some warnings as far as his Reckless stock trading yeah 400% return and then he was so over leveraged that he bankrupted his fund. Literally Citadel had to bail him out

Фото профиля Danjs
Danjs4 дней назад

Turn them all off

Фото профиля Jimmy Kroger
Jimmy Kroger5 дней назад

Imagine knowing all that and still blow up your fund

Фото профиля Sophie c.
Sophie c.3 дней назад

Firing for leaking doesn't prove correctness. What specific predictions from his reports have been validated?

Похожие видео

The man who turned $225 million into $13.7 billion said something two years ago that the entire AI industry is still catching up to (Save this). Everyone is talking about AI safety but almost nobody is actually working on it. That is not a hot take, that is Leopold Aschenbrenner doing the math out loud after going inside the actual labs and looking at the actual research happening. "There's barely anybody working on it. You could basically just talk to a couple few dozen people who are actually kind of good on the issue. And that's maybe even overstating it." He ran the numbers directly, and the ratio was staggering even then. Approximately 300 people were working on AI alignment globally against roughly 100,000 ML researchers, a ratio of 300 to 100,000. At the time, OpenAI had 400 employees and exactly seven people on its scalable alignment team, the group responsible for solving the long-term safety problem. DeepMind had thousands of researchers and roughly 20 working on alignment, and as Aschenbrenner pointedly noted, they were not exactly deploying their strongest scientists to the job. Two years later, it has only gotten worse. In February 2026, OpenAI dissolved its Mission Alignment unit entirely, a six-person team that had existed for just 16 months and redistributed the staff into product lines. The Future of Life Institute's AI Safety Index called out OpenAI by name this year, urging the company to rebuild lost safety team capacity. Stanford's 2026 AI Index confirmed that responsible AI is simply not keeping pace with AI capability, with safety benchmarks lagging while incidents rise sharply. The International AI Safety Report 2026, backed by 29 nations and over 100 experts, explicitly warned that capabilities are scaling faster than any mechanism we have to verify they are safe. What makes this clip so important is where Aschenbrenner started from. When he first encountered the AI safety discourse, he assumed the problem was covered, everyone was talking about it, so surely everyone was working on it. Then he actually looked at the research, sat with the systems, and came face to face with what was really there. "I was like, oh my god, this sucks. Nobody's actually doing anything. Like you've got to actually do things, people." The gap between the volume of online discourse and the actual number of people doing hard technical alignment work was not a minor mismatch two years ago and the labs have spent the time since making it larger, not smaller. We need more safety!

Milk Road AI

162,438 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад