正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Heard about carbon removal? 🤯 It’s technology to remove CO2 from the atmosphere 🌎 And safely and permanently store it away 🔐 McKinsey and other Frontier buyers are supporting Charm Industrial in removing 112,000 tons of CO2:

McKinsey & Company

660,446 subscribers

14,015 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The world has warmed about 1.2C since the mid-1800s. Our best estimate is that all of this warming is due to human emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Carbon Brief

The world has warmed about 1.2C since the mid-1800s. Our best estimate is that all of this warming is due to human emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Carbon Brief

Zeke Hausfather

356,348 次观看 • 3 年前

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Wide Awake Media

1,151,910 次观看 • 2 年前

Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, utterly demolishes the lie that CO2 is somehow bad for the environment: "Carbon dioxide is the currency of life, and the most important building block for all life on earth... The optimum level of CO2 for plant growth is about five times higher [than the concentration of CO2 present in the atmosphere today], yet the alarmists warn it is already too high. They must be challenged every day by every person who knows the truth in this matter. CO2 is the giver of life, and we should celebrate CO2 rather than denigrate it, as is the fashion today." Full talk: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #NetZeroScam

Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, utterly demolishes the lie that CO2 is somehow bad for the environment: "Carbon dioxide is the currency of life, and the most important building block for all life on earth... The optimum level of CO2 for plant growth is about five times higher [than the concentration of CO2 present in the atmosphere today], yet the alarmists warn it is already too high. They must be challenged every day by every person who knows the truth in this matter. CO2 is the giver of life, and we should celebrate CO2 rather than denigrate it, as is the fashion today." Full talk: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #NetZeroScam

Wide Awake Media

334,762 次观看 • 3 年前

The University of Nebraska debunks the manipulation behind cow farts/burps and methane: “They have not accounted for the capture part, they only account for methane being released. Carbon capture in soil and grass - helped out by cow grazing and manure - can far outweigh the emissions from cattle. Grasslands can take up more CO2 and carbon in the soil and plants, that offsets the CO2 that cattle are producing but it also offsets the methane.”

The University of Nebraska debunks the manipulation behind cow farts/burps and methane: “They have not accounted for the capture part, they only account for methane being released. Carbon capture in soil and grass - helped out by cow grazing and manure - can far outweigh the emissions from cattle. Grasslands can take up more CO2 and carbon in the soil and plants, that offsets the CO2 that cattle are producing but it also offsets the methane.”

James Melville 🚜

413,480 次观看 • 6 个月前

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

Robin Monotti

112,709 次观看 • 1 年前

“Humans are not causing climate change” “You can have very high carbon dioxide levels historically, yet the temperature was low” “The Oceans are warming from underneath, and as they do, they release CO2 into the atmosphere” Scientist Author Gregg Barden exposes the climate change scam, citing over 420,000 years of ice core data showing temperature rises that always proceed CO2 rises.

“Humans are not causing climate change” “You can have very high carbon dioxide levels historically, yet the temperature was low” “The Oceans are warming from underneath, and as they do, they release CO2 into the atmosphere” Scientist Author Gregg Barden exposes the climate change scam, citing over 420,000 years of ice core data showing temperature rises that always proceed CO2 rises.

Concerned Citizen

89,379 次观看 • 7 个月前

Emeritus Professor of Physics at Princeton University, William Happer: "More CO2 is good for the world... It's absurd to be trying to reduce CO2". "We're in a CO2 famine now... It's unbelievable that they've managed to turn this beneficial gas, a part of life, into a threat." "They talk about carbon pollution. I can't imagine what they're talking about. We're made of carbon, and we breathe out two pounds of CO2 a day, each of us—that's 8 billion people." "Many of them say, well, people are the real problem, it's not the CO2, we've got too many people, and really we can't have more than a billion people in the world." Source: Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates:

Emeritus Professor of Physics at Princeton University, William Happer: "More CO2 is good for the world... It's absurd to be trying to reduce CO2". "We're in a CO2 famine now... It's unbelievable that they've managed to turn this beneficial gas, a part of life, into a threat." "They talk about carbon pollution. I can't imagine what they're talking about. We're made of carbon, and we breathe out two pounds of CO2 a day, each of us—that's 8 billion people." "Many of them say, well, people are the real problem, it's not the CO2, we've got too many people, and really we can't have more than a billion people in the world." Source: Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates:

Wide Awake Media

508,589 次观看 • 2 年前

Ready to give up coffee, "to save the planet"? The planet would need saving if my coffee was taken away. 😂 Swiss banker and World Economic Forum "agenda contributor", Hubert Keller: "The coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coffee... Every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere."

Ready to give up coffee, "to save the planet"? The planet would need saving if my coffee was taken away. 😂 Swiss banker and World Economic Forum "agenda contributor", Hubert Keller: "The coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coffee... Every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere."

🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️

26,460 次观看 • 2 年前

🇨🇷 COSTA RICA’S ‘CAVE OF DEATH’: NATURE’S NO-TRESPASSING SIGN Costa Rica’s “Cave of Death” doesn’t need guardrails—it snuffs out torches (and life) with volcanic carbon dioxide (CO2) that floods its tiny 10-foot-long chamber. The gas displaces oxygen so fast it’s a one-way trip for any creature foolish enough to enter. This pint-sized death trap pumps out 263 tons of CO2 yearly, equal to a car driving 1.4 million miles. Visitors are wisely kept a few feet away, with skull-and-crossbones signs shouting, “Seriously, don’t try it!” A viral TikTok by Michael Adrescon shows a guide’s torch extinguished in seconds, smoke pressed flat by the CO2. It’s a natural wonder for tourists—and a masterclass in “stay outside the invisible danger zone.” Source: Daily Mail

🇨🇷 COSTA RICA’S ‘CAVE OF DEATH’: NATURE’S NO-TRESPASSING SIGN Costa Rica’s “Cave of Death” doesn’t need guardrails—it snuffs out torches (and life) with volcanic carbon dioxide (CO2) that floods its tiny 10-foot-long chamber. The gas displaces oxygen so fast it’s a one-way trip for any creature foolish enough to enter. This pint-sized death trap pumps out 263 tons of CO2 yearly, equal to a car driving 1.4 million miles. Visitors are wisely kept a few feet away, with skull-and-crossbones signs shouting, “Seriously, don’t try it!” A viral TikTok by Michael Adrescon shows a guide’s torch extinguished in seconds, smoke pressed flat by the CO2. It’s a natural wonder for tourists—and a masterclass in “stay outside the invisible danger zone.” Source: Daily Mail

Mario Nawfal

656,017 次观看 • 1 年前

I asked Erik Erik Bernhardsson why high CO2 levels in your office are such a big deal: "I'm not a health nut. But one of the things I've been radicalized on is CO2 levels. There's a real relationship between CO2 levels, productivity, and cognitive performance. And CO2 levels are usually way too high in offices and schools. Normal air CO2 levels are 300-500 PPM. In offices it often hits 1,000 or 2,000. Airplanes can get up to 2,500. You start getting brain damage at 5,000. So I went and bought a bunch of CO2 monitors for the office. And I look at them every day. And I open windows anytime we get too high."

I asked Erik Erik Bernhardsson why high CO2 levels in your office are such a big deal: "I'm not a health nut. But one of the things I've been radicalized on is CO2 levels. There's a real relationship between CO2 levels, productivity, and cognitive performance. And CO2 levels are usually way too high in offices and schools. Normal air CO2 levels are 300-500 PPM. In offices it often hits 1,000 or 2,000. Airplanes can get up to 2,500. You start getting brain damage at 5,000. So I went and bought a bunch of CO2 monitors for the office. And I look at them every day. And I open windows anytime we get too high."

The Peel

107,531 次观看 • 9 个月前

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5% with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per km, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5% with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per km, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

Electroverse

19,737 次观看 • 3 个月前

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

Electroverse

15,080 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇮🇹 Meanwhile in Italy Spectacular footage of Mount Etna spewing ash over 200m up into the atmosphere. Billions more tons of natural plant loving Co2 being poured into the atmosphere. But please keep thinking your petrol car, log burner and occasional steak either the problem when it comes to saving the planet ‼️

🚨🇮🇹 Meanwhile in Italy Spectacular footage of Mount Etna spewing ash over 200m up into the atmosphere. Billions more tons of natural plant loving Co2 being poured into the atmosphere. But please keep thinking your petrol car, log burner and occasional steak either the problem when it comes to saving the planet ‼️

Concerned Citizen

21,099 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨🚨🚨 They’ve somehow managed to turn the GAS that gives LIFE to this planet into a pollutant Right now our atmosphere has 400 PPM of CO2 = 0.04% At 600-1000 PPM of CO2 we get optimal FARMING conditions. At 200 PPM OF CO2, all plant life DIES. Companies use a Carbon dioxide generator to reach these conditions of 600 - 1000 PPM : (1) To increase yield by 30% or MORE (2) To produce an earlier harvest (3) To improve plants resistance to DISEASE and PESTS (4) If we increase CO2 in the atmosphere, we get OPTIMAL farming conditions (5) If we DECREASE CO2 in the atmosphere, we get an ICE AGE and DEATH of most life on the planet Isn’t it crazy that we are using billions of dollars of our own tax money to potentially cause death to most life on this planet? You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to understand these basic facts, so, why do our “experts” and “scientists” not understand this? Is it corruption? Is it incompetence? Is it intentional? Is it a part of the depopulation agenda of the elites? If it is, how would they be able to guarantee their own safety? I would love to hear an explanation, because I really don’t get it.

🚨🚨🚨 They’ve somehow managed to turn the GAS that gives LIFE to this planet into a pollutant Right now our atmosphere has 400 PPM of CO2 = 0.04% At 600-1000 PPM of CO2 we get optimal FARMING conditions. At 200 PPM OF CO2, all plant life DIES. Companies use a Carbon dioxide generator to reach these conditions of 600 - 1000 PPM : (1) To increase yield by 30% or MORE (2) To produce an earlier harvest (3) To improve plants resistance to DISEASE and PESTS (4) If we increase CO2 in the atmosphere, we get OPTIMAL farming conditions (5) If we DECREASE CO2 in the atmosphere, we get an ICE AGE and DEATH of most life on the planet Isn’t it crazy that we are using billions of dollars of our own tax money to potentially cause death to most life on this planet? You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to understand these basic facts, so, why do our “experts” and “scientists” not understand this? Is it corruption? Is it incompetence? Is it intentional? Is it a part of the depopulation agenda of the elites? If it is, how would they be able to guarantee their own safety? I would love to hear an explanation, because I really don’t get it.

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

384,014 次观看 • 1 年前

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.

Electroverse

31,215 次观看 • 1 个月前

Humans are NOT Responsible for Increases in CO2 The data really does speak for itself. Only 12% of the increase in CO2 between 1750 and 2018 was man-made. That's much too low to be the cause of any claimed global warming. Nature controls carbon dioxide levels, not humans. #ClimateScam #UnitedNations #GreenEnergy #NetZero #GlobalBoiling

Humans are NOT Responsible for Increases in CO2 The data really does speak for itself. Only 12% of the increase in CO2 between 1750 and 2018 was man-made. That's much too low to be the cause of any claimed global warming. Nature controls carbon dioxide levels, not humans. #ClimateScam #UnitedNations #GreenEnergy #NetZero #GlobalBoiling

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

119,123 次观看 • 2 年前

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

Sophia Dahl

14,402 次观看 • 1 年前