Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Hegseth on munitions: Why would I answer a question about whether we do or do not have certain types of munitions? I would tell you we have 110%, or I'd tell you we have 1%—I would never answer that question. The American press is foolish to want to press... show more

Clash Report

880,840 subscribers

30,241 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth MIC DROPPED this reporter asking about US military secrets "I mean, this is the kind of STUPID question I would NEVER answer!" "WHY would I answer?" "An American press is FOOLISH to want to press an American War Department about where we may or may not be on classified exquisite systems." "Why would I answer whether we do or do not have certain types of munitions. I'll tell you we have 110%! I'll tell you we have 1—I'd never answer that question." We love Pete 🔥🔥

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth MIC DROPPED this reporter asking about US military secrets "I mean, this is the kind of STUPID question I would NEVER answer!" "WHY would I answer?" "An American press is FOOLISH to want to press an American War Department about where we may or may not be on classified exquisite systems." "Why would I answer whether we do or do not have certain types of munitions. I'll tell you we have 110%! I'll tell you we have 1—I'd never answer that question." We love Pete 🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

48,880 views • 2 days ago

🚨 WATCH: Trump teaches reporter a lesson about national security. REPORTER: Would you preemptively strike Iran's nuclear facilities?" TRUMP: "Am I gonna do preemptive strikes? Why would I say that? Can you imagine if I said 'yes' or 'no?' ... Is that a serious question? How could I answer?" REPORTER: Would you support Israel doing it? TRUMP: "How could I tell you a thing like that now? You don't talk about that before something may or may not happen. I don't want to insult you, it's just not something I would ever answer."

🚨 WATCH: Trump teaches reporter a lesson about national security. REPORTER: Would you preemptively strike Iran's nuclear facilities?" TRUMP: "Am I gonna do preemptive strikes? Why would I say that? Can you imagine if I said 'yes' or 'no?' ... Is that a serious question? How could I answer?" REPORTER: Would you support Israel doing it? TRUMP: "How could I tell you a thing like that now? You don't talk about that before something may or may not happen. I don't want to insult you, it's just not something I would ever answer."

Eric Daugherty

3,421,169 views • 1 year ago

CRAZY!! Watch this exchange with Trump. Trump: "Am I gonna do preemptive strikes? Why would I say that? Can you imagine if I said 'yes' or 'no?' ... Is that a serious question? How could I answer?" Reporter: Would you support Israel doing it? Trump: "How could I tell you a thing like that now? You don't talk about that before something may or may not happen. I don't want to insult you; it's just not something I would ever answer."

CRAZY!! Watch this exchange with Trump. Trump: "Am I gonna do preemptive strikes? Why would I say that? Can you imagine if I said 'yes' or 'no?' ... Is that a serious question? How could I answer?" Reporter: Would you support Israel doing it? Trump: "How could I tell you a thing like that now? You don't talk about that before something may or may not happen. I don't want to insult you; it's just not something I would ever answer."

Raylan Givens

422,559 views • 1 year ago

Erika Kirk says her husband, Charlie Kirk, is no longer here to answer the question of whether the United States should be at war with Iran. She says, thank God we have archived footage of Charlie to look at. "I would love for him to be here right now to tell us whether we should or should not." "It's frustrating when you have people speaking for him."

Erika Kirk says her husband, Charlie Kirk, is no longer here to answer the question of whether the United States should be at war with Iran. She says, thank God we have archived footage of Charlie to look at. "I would love for him to be here right now to tell us whether we should or should not." "It's frustrating when you have people speaking for him."

Shadow of Ezra

959,409 views • 5 months ago

.Kirsten Gillibrand: I would like to know why you have not sought the support of the American people. 3 out of 5 Americans are against this war Hegseth: We do have the support of the American people. We are two months in. This is a defined mission set Gillibrand: So you don’t care that the American people are not supporting this war?

.Kirsten Gillibrand: I would like to know why you have not sought the support of the American people. 3 out of 5 Americans are against this war Hegseth: We do have the support of the American people. We are two months in. This is a defined mission set Gillibrand: So you don’t care that the American people are not supporting this war?

Headquarters

81,492 views • 4 months ago

I asked Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Thursday whether the U.S. would consider sending Special Ops units into Iran to secure key nuclear sites like Isfahan. “One of the objectives the President has always said is that Iran will not have a nuclear bomb, nuclear capabilities," Secretary Hegseth told me. "But we would never disclose what we will or will not do inside an operational plan." "So, Admiral Cooper’s got a plan. We’re working [on] that plan. And targets will be struck or not struck, according to what we want to achieve.”

I asked Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Thursday whether the U.S. would consider sending Special Ops units into Iran to secure key nuclear sites like Isfahan. “One of the objectives the President has always said is that Iran will not have a nuclear bomb, nuclear capabilities," Secretary Hegseth told me. "But we would never disclose what we will or will not do inside an operational plan." "So, Admiral Cooper’s got a plan. We’re working [on] that plan. And targets will be struck or not struck, according to what we want to achieve.”

Mary Margaret Olohan

34,465 views • 5 months ago

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

157,862 views • 1 month ago

What you think...would they answer of that question, If they are or not gays? Here but we have a perfect demonstration of their beautiful gay acting skills.

What you think...would they answer of that question, If they are or not gays? Here but we have a perfect demonstration of their beautiful gay acting skills.

💯Gallavich~Hollanov Geek || (she || her || hers)

10,791 views • 8 months ago

❗️President Trump on Tomahawks for Ukraine: Well, I don't know. I might have to speak to Russia, to be honest with you about Tomahawks. Do they want to have tomahawks going in their direction? I don't think so. I think I might speak to Russia about that, in all fairness. I told that to President Zelensky, because Tomahawks are a new step of aggression. You understand that very well. And honestly, Russia does not need that. They don't need that. Yeah, I might tell them that if the war is not settled, that we may very well — we may not, but we may do it.

❗️President Trump on Tomahawks for Ukraine: Well, I don't know. I might have to speak to Russia, to be honest with you about Tomahawks. Do they want to have tomahawks going in their direction? I don't think so. I think I might speak to Russia about that, in all fairness. I told that to President Zelensky, because Tomahawks are a new step of aggression. You understand that very well. And honestly, Russia does not need that. They don't need that. Yeah, I might tell them that if the war is not settled, that we may very well — we may not, but we may do it.

Anton Gerashchenko

274,987 views • 10 months ago

QUINTANILLA: Do we think the Russians have shared intel about the location of US military assets, and if so, why would we be giving waivers on Russian oil sanctions? WITKOFF: I'm not an intel officer, so I can't tell you. I can tell you that on the call with the president, the Russians said they have not been sharing. That's what they said. We can take them at their word.

QUINTANILLA: Do we think the Russians have shared intel about the location of US military assets, and if so, why would we be giving waivers on Russian oil sanctions? WITKOFF: I'm not an intel officer, so I can't tell you. I can tell you that on the call with the president, the Russians said they have not been sharing. That's what they said. We can take them at their word.

Aaron Rupar

1,454,364 views • 5 months ago

We may or may not be working on an album. Who would you wanna see on there?

We may or may not be working on an album. Who would you wanna see on there?

Pete and Bas

20,415 views • 1 year ago

BLACK AMERICANS WHY WOULD HE ASK A HAITIAN INSTEAD OF A BLACK AMERICAN ABOUT IF WE HAVE CULTURE OR NOT?‼️🤔

BLACK AMERICANS WHY WOULD HE ASK A HAITIAN INSTEAD OF A BLACK AMERICAN ABOUT IF WE HAVE CULTURE OR NOT?‼️🤔

SoulFood66

47,850 views • 1 year ago

❗️Europe must answer whether it is ready for war, — Zelenskyy Ukrainians also were not ready for war — neither in 2013 nor in 2014, when no one could imagine that a neighboring state would launch an occupation and killings. Zelenskyy emphasized that he regularly puts the question to his European counterparts about their readiness for such challenges, but he has still not received a clear answer. “I have never once heard a specific answer — only ‘we must prepare’ or ‘we don’t know.’”

❗️Europe must answer whether it is ready for war, — Zelenskyy Ukrainians also were not ready for war — neither in 2013 nor in 2014, when no one could imagine that a neighboring state would launch an occupation and killings. Zelenskyy emphasized that he regularly puts the question to his European counterparts about their readiness for such challenges, but he has still not received a clear answer. “I have never once heard a specific answer — only ‘we must prepare’ or ‘we don’t know.’”

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

25,487 views • 7 months ago

.President Donald J. Trump on Venezuela: “If we didn't do this, China would have been there and Russia would have been there. Maybe they both would have been there together, but they’re not going to be there now. The one thing I will tell them and I will tell you that we are open for business.”

.President Donald J. Trump on Venezuela: “If we didn't do this, China would have been there and Russia would have been there. Maybe they both would have been there together, but they’re not going to be there now. The one thing I will tell them and I will tell you that we are open for business.”

Department of State

256,292 views • 7 months ago

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

RedWave Press

730,069 views • 5 months ago

🚨FBI Director Kash Patel confirms a definitive answer on whether FBI sources were present during J6 is coming soon. Says it will “surprise and shock” everyone. “I told you I would get you the definitive answer. And we have. We are in the process of working with our partners to divulge that information.” “The answer to that question will surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it.”

🚨FBI Director Kash Patel confirms a definitive answer on whether FBI sources were present during J6 is coming soon. Says it will “surprise and shock” everyone. “I told you I would get you the definitive answer. And we have. We are in the process of working with our partners to divulge that information.” “The answer to that question will surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it.”

Benny Johnson

904,977 views • 1 year ago