HEINRICH: So I'm curious, did this conversation at some point include information on weapons packages, targets or timing? RATCLIFFE: Not that I'm aware of. HEINRICH: Director Gabbard, same question. GABBARD: Same answer and defer to the Department of Defense on that question.

HEINRICH: Those are two different answers, but you are saying that did not -- that was not part of the conversation? GABBARD: That's my knowledge. HEINRICH: Precise operational issues were not part of this conversation? GABBARD: Correct.

RATCLIFFE: Predecisional strike deliberations should be conducted through classified channels.

Reporter: Who does the history books credit for this Mr. President, you or Trump? Biden: Is that a joke? ... ... ... Thank you.

@jaketapper

@jaketapper Part of me thinks “good lesson to show my kids… just be honest, the truth will come out and you’ll be in less trouble”. Problem is, lying is the basis of this whole administration and there will likely be zero consequences… we’re so screwed…

@anneapplebaum Let's not lose sight of the fact that Tulsi being DNI is a much bigger threat to national security than this Signal conversation.

"information on weapons packages, targets or timing" They are outright lying at this point.

@jaketapper Seems like a straight up lie

@jaketapper Just blatantly and knowingly lying. This is criminal

Liars All of them

@jaketapper This is not testimony. This is simply lying under oath. Fire these clowns before they destroy our national security