正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Helen Zille : Bra Herman was front for Julius Malema.
12,551 次观看 • 23 天前 •via X (Twitter)
20 条评论

So in essence Herman’s achievements he uses to mobilise for votes are in fact Malema’s achievements?

Correct

@Kgoshigadi_TT @Julius_S_Malema is the bread and butter of SA politics…….all I heard was his name totally missed her point

would you go wane to face such, lenna I would send my spokesperson

😂

He was. That’s why his own caucus turned against him.

She still talks about Afrirent yet that matter was found to be false in court. The Afrirent issue hurts me so much because they lost Funding from @AbsaSouthAfrica because of lies. Mxm. Actually Fck ABSA, I need to move away from that bank now that I remember what they did.

So she used her entire debate time on her nemesis, is this the debate she was crying about? 🤣🤣🤣

a serious legal team is needed to deal with this gogo for these Defamatory statements. 🤷🏿♂️📞 this is certainly not how to campaign. No plan. Just Defamatory nonsense!

Shut the fxck up!

She likes to portray herself as a freedom fighter but I'm yet to come across that solid evidence - reporting Biko's death as a journalist can't stand - wasn't she part of STRATCOM...?

@Julius_S_Malema has been suing people for saying less. Surely these are grounds for him to sue @helenzille ??? Or how does it work?

@Julius_S_Malema @helenzille This is political speech

@MelziPeters @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille People on this APP are not that bright they don’t understand the simplest things

@Law7544 @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille "Political speech” isn’t a magic legal shield. SAn law distinguishes political criticism from defamatory factual allegations. If you allege someone enabled corruption or engineered a quid-pro-quo, you may face defamation proceedings; the issue is whether a defence applies

@Law7544 @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille The irony is that “political speech” can itself be scrutinised in court. Freedom of expression does not automatically defeat defamation. Truth, public interest and fair comment are recognised defences but they must actually be established. “It was political” is not one.

@Law7544 @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille Curious how litigation is suddenly unattractive when the allegation is serious enough to warrant testing in court yet far lesser remarks from less powerful people can apparently trigger litigation. Perhaps it is because the allegation itself may become the smokeimg gun

@Law7544 @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille Are you done?

@Law7544 @Julius_S_Malema @helenzille 3 hours later. What do you think? Am using that verb liberally given the obvious evidence on the table

Even CIC said so and was no longer listening to his DA cocus. But blames Helen Zille for firing him.
