正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Hello Aiyyo Shraddha Does opposing Hindi imposition in Karnataka make us anti-national? Is accepting it the only way to prove we are Indian? Why is it right to kannada and agitation against #HindiImposition in Karnataka can’t be seen as pro-India without accepting Hindi imposition !!? #StopHindiImposition VC: Aiyyoshraddha youtube

29,953 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Anti Hindi imposition agitation shown in Parashakthi movie was not just about Tamil identity or pride. It was about livelihood and opportunity of non-Hindi speaking Indians. **The interview scene of Sivakarthikeyan's character just before the interval block portrays the horrific reality of Hindi imposition** The trailer cut didn't place that scene to avoid spoilers. But that's the most important scene and a take away of this movie for the young generation who learns about this historic protest. 🔹 The anti–Hindi imposition movement ALSO fought for English as a neutral link language across India. One that is not native to any Indian region and people. 🔹 Hindi was already the mother tongue of many North Indians, giving them a built-in advantage for Hindi speakers in competitive exams, jobs, businesses etc., For non-Hindi speakers, it is a huge disadvantage. 🔹 English ensured equal access to education, jobs, and mobility, across India and across the world for all Indians as it is not a native language for anyone in India. This decision of retaining English (the original intent was to replace English with Hindi) didn’t benefit only Tamilians. It empowered all Indians. If not for anti-Hindi imposition protest in 1960s Tamil Nadu, English would have been phased out and only available for the ultra elites in India. People in Tamil Nadu sacrificed their lives. Leaders went to jail for fairness, inclusion, and future growth. That is the real legacy of the historic anti-Hindi imposition struggle and protest and Parashakthi gives a sneak peak of it. And its a continuous struggle even now. #Parashakthi #stopHindiImposition #ParashakthiPongal

Prabha

40,969 次观看 • 7 个月前

The only real, documented, internationally recognized campaigns of ethnic cleansing and economic cleansing are those carried out by the India — During 1984 Sikh Genocide and today ECONOCIDE of Punjab under India’s Modi Government. Yet today, a yellow journalist on X is deliberately misrepresenting SFJ’s political slogan — “NA HINDI • NA HINDUTVA • NA HINDUSTAN” — and, with criminal intent, is falsely branding it as a “call for ethnic cleansing.” it is malicious disinformation intended to smear a democratic movement and shield Hindutva extremism from accountability. To remove any confusion manufactured by follower of Modi’s Violent Hindutva idealogy, here is what each word Politically means: 1. “NA HINDI” — REJECTION OF IMPOSITION, NOT PEOPLE “Na Hindi” rejects the forced imposition of Hindi as a national identity. It does not target or vilify Hindi-speaking people. It is a political objection to linguistic domination — nothing more. 2. “NA HINDUTVA” — REJECTION OF IDEOLOGY, NOT RELIGION OR ETHNICITY “Hindutva” is a political extremist ideology, not a religion, ethnicity, or community. Opposing Hindutva is the same as opposing fascism, apartheid, or state extremism. Condemning an ideology is not “ethnic cleansing” under any definition in international law. 3. “NA HINDUSTAN” — REJECTION OF THE INDIA’S OCCUPATION OF PUNJAB - THE SIKH HOMELAND “Na Hindustan” rejects the Indian state’s Military occupation of Punjab. It does not attack Indian civilians, any community, or any ethnic group. It is right to self-determination expression used by Khalistan Referendum movement across the world.

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun

14,056 次观看 • 9 个月前