Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hello.K.Annamalai Kindly know the difference between a Satelite Launcher (a.k.a Rocket) and a Missile. Missile - ஏவுகணை - ஒரு இடத்தில் இருந்து புறப்பட்டு இன்னொரு இடத்தை நோக்கி சென்று அழிப்பதே ஏவுகணை (Missile) உதாரணம் : Agni, Prithvi and Brahmos are Missiles. Launcher என்பது செயற்கைக்கோளை வட்டப்பாதையில் கொண்டு விடுவது. நீங்கள் சொல்லும் சம்பவம் நடந்தது 1979 ஆம்...

JKalyanaraman's profile picture

Kalyan - #வந்தேமாதரம் 🇮🇳

18,011 subscribers

22,683 просмотров • 13 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

South Korea is known for its love with firepower and missiles, and they've equipped their 250ton high-speed boats with 130mm missile launcher platforms, 76mm guns, advanced sensors, and electronic warfare systems. Looking at it this way, PKMR looks odd but also cute. Anti-ship cruise missiles are too expensive and bulky, 90mm LOGIR missiles are limited, and the naval version of the 239mm CGR-080 or CTM series rocket artillery is expensive and overpowered for the PKMR's mission. Therefore, the development of the 130mm Biryong missile was a logical choice. As you might have guessed, the PKMR was designed for immediate and simultaneous interception of a rush of North Korean vessels.
0:30

South Korea is known for its love with firepower and missiles, and they've equipped their 250ton high-speed boats with 130mm missile launcher platforms, 76mm guns, advanced sensors, and electronic warfare systems. Looking at it this way, PKMR looks odd but also cute. Anti-ship cruise missiles are too expensive and bulky, 90mm LOGIR missiles are limited, and the naval version of the 239mm CGR-080 or CTM series rocket artillery is expensive and overpowered for the PKMR's mission. Therefore, the development of the 130mm Biryong missile was a logical choice. As you might have guessed, the PKMR was designed for immediate and simultaneous interception of a rush of North Korean vessels.

Mason ヨンハク

110,706 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

India’s $5 BN Nuclear Train India has developed a rail-based nuclear missile launcher system, publicly tested in September 2025 with the Agni-Prime missile, enhancing its strategic deterrence. This capability allows missiles to move undetected on India's vast rail network, blending with civilian traffic and hiding in tunnels. No verified reports confirm a "$5 billion" cost or label it a "secret nuclear train" as sensationalized in recent YouTube videos. ​ ​System Overview The rail mobile launcher supports canisterised Agni-Prime missiles with a 2,000 km range, enabling quick launches from any rail location without preconditions. These self-sustained units carry warheads, logistics, and personnel, functioning as mobile bases to evade satellite detection. India joins an elite group including China, Russia, and North Korea with operational rail-based nuclear systems. ​ ​Strategic Advantages Rail launchers boost survivability by dispersing assets across 65,000+ km of tracks, complicating enemy targeting and preemptive strikes. They support heavier payloads than road mobiles and integrate into India's nuclear triad alongside air, road, and submarine platforms like INS Arihant. The Agni-Prime, lighter and more advanced than predecessors, replaces older Agni-I/II models in the Strategic Forces Command. ​ ​Development Context Defence Minister Rajnath Singh announced the first test on September 24, 2025, confirming DRDO and SFC's success under full operational conditions. Earlier Agni variants (2,3,4) already used rail platforms since the 2010s, but Agni-Prime adds canisterised cold-launch tech for faster reaction. This bolsters deterrence against Pakistan and China amid regional tensions. Credit : The Echo.
9:41

India’s $5 BN Nuclear Train India has developed a rail-based nuclear missile launcher system, publicly tested in September 2025 with the Agni-Prime missile, enhancing its strategic deterrence. This capability allows missiles to move undetected on India's vast rail network, blending with civilian traffic and hiding in tunnels. No verified reports confirm a "$5 billion" cost or label it a "secret nuclear train" as sensationalized in recent YouTube videos. ​ ​System Overview The rail mobile launcher supports canisterised Agni-Prime missiles with a 2,000 km range, enabling quick launches from any rail location without preconditions. These self-sustained units carry warheads, logistics, and personnel, functioning as mobile bases to evade satellite detection. India joins an elite group including China, Russia, and North Korea with operational rail-based nuclear systems. ​ ​Strategic Advantages Rail launchers boost survivability by dispersing assets across 65,000+ km of tracks, complicating enemy targeting and preemptive strikes. They support heavier payloads than road mobiles and integrate into India's nuclear triad alongside air, road, and submarine platforms like INS Arihant. The Agni-Prime, lighter and more advanced than predecessors, replaces older Agni-I/II models in the Strategic Forces Command. ​ ​Development Context Defence Minister Rajnath Singh announced the first test on September 24, 2025, confirming DRDO and SFC's success under full operational conditions. Earlier Agni variants (2,3,4) already used rail platforms since the 2010s, but Agni-Prime adds canisterised cold-launch tech for faster reaction. This bolsters deterrence against Pakistan and China amid regional tensions. Credit : The Echo.

Augadh

37,414 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

‼️‼️ #BREAKING 🛰️ 🇮🇷 Satellite images of Iran’s underground missile bases have been released, showing continuous airstrikes carried out with bunker-penetrating bombs. As a result, while during the first two days of the war the Iranian regime was launching hundreds of ballistic missiles, that number has now dropped to only several dozen per day, sometimes not exceeding 15–18 launches. 🎯 Geography of the strikes: ▪️ Missile base south of Isfahan: Satellite imagery dated March 3 shows strike marks at two tunnel entrances. The damage was likely caused by GBU-31 BLU-109 one-ton bunker-penetrating bombs, which appear to have pierced the ground and collapsed internal tunnel exits. ▪️ Missile base in Kashan: Images show destroyed surface buildings and two destroyed vehicles. ▪️ Missile base north of Kermanshah: All surface structures are destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were likely damaged. A strike mark is visible on a nearby road, though the intended target is unclear. ▪️ Missile base south of Tabriz: The radar station domes and auxiliary structures of a recently built facility have been destroyed, while tunnel entrances are damaged. Numerous explosion craters are also visible along nearby roads. ▪️ Missile base in Dezful: Airstrikes destroyed surface infrastructure and buildings. ▪️ Missile base in Bid Kaneh: Tunnel entrances were struck with bunker-penetrating munitions. The checkpoint and support buildings have been destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes against missile launchers. ▪️ Updated imagery from the base north of Isfahan: Strikes continue against launch systems likely emerging from underground facilities. Fuel spill traces are visible from at least two destroyed launchers. ▪️ Updated imagery of the Khorgu missile base after repeated strikes: Tunnel entrances appear to have been the primary target. It remains unclear whether bunker-penetrating weapons were used, but the entrances suffered significant damage. Evidence also shows one destroyed launcher. ▪️ Missile base in Yazd: Strikes targeted tunnel entrances, while support buildings were destroyed. Craters along nearby roads indicate attempts to destroy mobile launchers, though their effectiveness is uncertain. ▪️ Missile base in Lar: Strike marks are visible on tunnel entrances, while most auxiliary buildings are destroyed or heavily damaged. Additional strike marks on nearby roads suggest attacks on missile launch systems.
0:24

‼️‼️ #BREAKING 🛰️ 🇮🇷 Satellite images of Iran’s underground missile bases have been released, showing continuous airstrikes carried out with bunker-penetrating bombs. As a result, while during the first two days of the war the Iranian regime was launching hundreds of ballistic missiles, that number has now dropped to only several dozen per day, sometimes not exceeding 15–18 launches. 🎯 Geography of the strikes: ▪️ Missile base south of Isfahan: Satellite imagery dated March 3 shows strike marks at two tunnel entrances. The damage was likely caused by GBU-31 BLU-109 one-ton bunker-penetrating bombs, which appear to have pierced the ground and collapsed internal tunnel exits. ▪️ Missile base in Kashan: Images show destroyed surface buildings and two destroyed vehicles. ▪️ Missile base north of Kermanshah: All surface structures are destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were likely damaged. A strike mark is visible on a nearby road, though the intended target is unclear. ▪️ Missile base south of Tabriz: The radar station domes and auxiliary structures of a recently built facility have been destroyed, while tunnel entrances are damaged. Numerous explosion craters are also visible along nearby roads. ▪️ Missile base in Dezful: Airstrikes destroyed surface infrastructure and buildings. ▪️ Missile base in Bid Kaneh: Tunnel entrances were struck with bunker-penetrating munitions. The checkpoint and support buildings have been destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes against missile launchers. ▪️ Updated imagery from the base north of Isfahan: Strikes continue against launch systems likely emerging from underground facilities. Fuel spill traces are visible from at least two destroyed launchers. ▪️ Updated imagery of the Khorgu missile base after repeated strikes: Tunnel entrances appear to have been the primary target. It remains unclear whether bunker-penetrating weapons were used, but the entrances suffered significant damage. Evidence also shows one destroyed launcher. ▪️ Missile base in Yazd: Strikes targeted tunnel entrances, while support buildings were destroyed. Craters along nearby roads indicate attempts to destroy mobile launchers, though their effectiveness is uncertain. ▪️ Missile base in Lar: Strike marks are visible on tunnel entrances, while most auxiliary buildings are destroyed or heavily damaged. Additional strike marks on nearby roads suggest attacks on missile launch systems.

NSTRIKE

12,562 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

📍Explaining the CEP (Circular Error Probable) of Fatah-2 Fatah-2 MaRV capable Ballistic missile / rocket offers a CEP of around 4-5m (<10m), which is significantly good as a GMLRS, considering their role and mass operationalization. CEP (Circular Error Probable) for a missile is a measure of its accuracy, defined as the radius of a circle, centered on the target, within which 50% of the missile impacts are expected to fall, a smaller CEP indicates greater precision, crucial for planning military operations and assessing weapon system effectiveness. Let's suppose, If a missile has a CEP of 10 meters, it means that when fired at a specific point, 50% chances are present that the warhead will land at the pinpoint or quite near the center, and the other 50% chances count for the impacts in that intended 10m circle around the target. When Pakistan tests missiles, there are usually around 2-3 separate circles to analyze the CEP or accuracy. Fatah-2 fell almost near central point, validating its cep mentioned above. Hence, it didn't miss the target, it achieved its intended accuracy and with a warhead of ≈300kg, it can even take down a whole maintenance hanger, if used.
0:23

📍Explaining the CEP (Circular Error Probable) of Fatah-2 Fatah-2 MaRV capable Ballistic missile / rocket offers a CEP of around 4-5m (<10m), which is significantly good as a GMLRS, considering their role and mass operationalization. CEP (Circular Error Probable) for a missile is a measure of its accuracy, defined as the radius of a circle, centered on the target, within which 50% of the missile impacts are expected to fall, a smaller CEP indicates greater precision, crucial for planning military operations and assessing weapon system effectiveness. Let's suppose, If a missile has a CEP of 10 meters, it means that when fired at a specific point, 50% chances are present that the warhead will land at the pinpoint or quite near the center, and the other 50% chances count for the impacts in that intended 10m circle around the target. When Pakistan tests missiles, there are usually around 2-3 separate circles to analyze the CEP or accuracy. Fatah-2 fell almost near central point, validating its cep mentioned above. Hence, it didn't miss the target, it achieved its intended accuracy and with a warhead of ≈300kg, it can even take down a whole maintenance hanger, if used.

AM Raad

35,862 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸Iran or US: Who will win missile war or attrition? Russian military expert, historian of the Air Defense Forces Yuri Knutov explains: 💬 "If we look at the numbers being cited, Iran is said to have between 2,000 and 4,000 missiles. At a launch rate of around 100 or more per day, that would suggest roughly a month of sustained high-intensity missile attacks. As for THAAD interceptors, about 650 have been produced in total, with 150 used during a previous attack. That would leave roughly 400 remaining, possibly fewer. With careful and efficient use, that stock could last around 10 days — perhaps as little as five. If we’re talking about Patriot missiles, the US stockpile is larger, of course, but it can be depleted as well. Especially if they launch 10 missiles against a single Iranian ballistic missile, then they would have enough for three weeks, and that's with a very, very large margin. 👉 So Iran has a very important trump card right now. And if it uses its missiles correctly, saving its most technologically advanced ones, the hypersonic Fattahs, for the final stage—and the Fattahs are not intercepted at all by Israeli Arrow-3 missiles, nor by American THAAD and Patriot systems—then Iran essentially has a chance to land a very painful blow on Israel and the US. And in that way, essentially, to take revenge for the surprise attack carried out on Iran. [The US] produces around 55 interceptors per month, which is not enough to rapidly replenish heavy battlefield usage. New production facilities are under construction in Germany and Romania, but they are not yet operational. While some missiles could potentially be sourced from Arab states, yet Arab countries are using these missiles too. That’s why I say that given this intensity, this missile use can endure from two to three weeks, four weeks tops. But we don’t know the situation in Iran. It’s possible Iran has underground plants where ballistic missiles are produced as well."
0:32

🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸Iran or US: Who will win missile war or attrition? Russian military expert, historian of the Air Defense Forces Yuri Knutov explains: 💬 "If we look at the numbers being cited, Iran is said to have between 2,000 and 4,000 missiles. At a launch rate of around 100 or more per day, that would suggest roughly a month of sustained high-intensity missile attacks. As for THAAD interceptors, about 650 have been produced in total, with 150 used during a previous attack. That would leave roughly 400 remaining, possibly fewer. With careful and efficient use, that stock could last around 10 days — perhaps as little as five. If we’re talking about Patriot missiles, the US stockpile is larger, of course, but it can be depleted as well. Especially if they launch 10 missiles against a single Iranian ballistic missile, then they would have enough for three weeks, and that's with a very, very large margin. 👉 So Iran has a very important trump card right now. And if it uses its missiles correctly, saving its most technologically advanced ones, the hypersonic Fattahs, for the final stage—and the Fattahs are not intercepted at all by Israeli Arrow-3 missiles, nor by American THAAD and Patriot systems—then Iran essentially has a chance to land a very painful blow on Israel and the US. And in that way, essentially, to take revenge for the surprise attack carried out on Iran. [The US] produces around 55 interceptors per month, which is not enough to rapidly replenish heavy battlefield usage. New production facilities are under construction in Germany and Romania, but they are not yet operational. While some missiles could potentially be sourced from Arab states, yet Arab countries are using these missiles too. That’s why I say that given this intensity, this missile use can endure from two to three weeks, four weeks tops. But we don’t know the situation in Iran. It’s possible Iran has underground plants where ballistic missiles are produced as well."

Sputnik

195,817 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 Civilian aircraft are now MASSIVELY vulnerable. Anyone can build a functional MANPADS missile launcher for under $100 full designs, 3D-print files, firmware, and AI targeting all open-sourced on GitHub right now. Shoulder-fired. Guided rocket. Built to lock onto and take down planes. What used to require nation-state factories, military supply chains, and millions in R&D… now anyone with a garage and a printer can make it. Our commercial airliners have zero defense against this new reality. The democratization of weapons just turned every flight into a potential target. The launcher and rocket use ESP32 microcontrollers along with sensors including an MPU6050 IMU, NEO-6M GPS, QMC5883L compass, and BMP180 barometric sensor. Flight stabilization is handled through a proportional-derivative control loop that adjusts canard control surfaces during flight. The mechanical structure was designed in Fusion 360 and analyzed in OpenRocket to evaluate aerodynamic stability. Most structural components were produced using consumer-grade 3D printing and assembled with threaded inserts, machine screws, and custom springs. Total build cost: approximately $96. $6 Esp32 (2) $17 MG996r Servos (4) $3 SG90 Servos (2) $4 Switches (4) $15 ABS pipe (1) $20 Urgenex 1100mAh Battery (2) $1 BMP180 (1) $1 MPU6050 (1) $5 NEO-6M (1) $2 QMC5883l (1) $1 Active Buzzer(1) $17 PLA Plastic (1.5 kg) $2 PVC Pipe (9 in) $2 Rocket Propellant (170g) Wires / Capacitors / etc Negligible Future development explores integration with distributed camera-node tracking networks capable of generating real-time XYZ coordinates of airborne objects.
5:17

🚨 Civilian aircraft are now MASSIVELY vulnerable. Anyone can build a functional MANPADS missile launcher for under $100 full designs, 3D-print files, firmware, and AI targeting all open-sourced on GitHub right now. Shoulder-fired. Guided rocket. Built to lock onto and take down planes. What used to require nation-state factories, military supply chains, and millions in R&D… now anyone with a garage and a printer can make it. Our commercial airliners have zero defense against this new reality. The democratization of weapons just turned every flight into a potential target. The launcher and rocket use ESP32 microcontrollers along with sensors including an MPU6050 IMU, NEO-6M GPS, QMC5883L compass, and BMP180 barometric sensor. Flight stabilization is handled through a proportional-derivative control loop that adjusts canard control surfaces during flight. The mechanical structure was designed in Fusion 360 and analyzed in OpenRocket to evaluate aerodynamic stability. Most structural components were produced using consumer-grade 3D printing and assembled with threaded inserts, machine screws, and custom springs. Total build cost: approximately $96. $6 Esp32 (2) $17 MG996r Servos (4) $3 SG90 Servos (2) $4 Switches (4) $15 ABS pipe (1) $20 Urgenex 1100mAh Battery (2) $1 BMP180 (1) $1 MPU6050 (1) $5 NEO-6M (1) $2 QMC5883l (1) $1 Active Buzzer(1) $17 PLA Plastic (1.5 kg) $2 PVC Pipe (9 in) $2 Rocket Propellant (170g) Wires / Capacitors / etc Negligible Future development explores integration with distributed camera-node tracking networks capable of generating real-time XYZ coordinates of airborne objects.

Dagnum P.I.

436,868 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?
0:23

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?

NewRulesGeopolitics

14,925 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Come and hear about the war crimes committed by Hamas. This is an important post, read it all. I mean, beyond the "usual" things they do, like killing Israeli civilians, LGBTQ+ individuals, and opposition figures in Gaza. This war crime is the relentless rocket fire on Israeli civilians. In 2001, Hamas, the Gaza basee terrorist organization, began independently producing and launching rockets into civilian population centers. Since then, especially after Israel fully withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas' rocket fire intensified, and their launch capabilities expanded significantly. Instead of investing in Gaza's infrastructure, Hamas diverted aid funds, equipment provided by the UN and world governments to build rockets with the sole purpose of indiscriminately killing Israeli civilians. They placed launchers and bomb-making facilities within civilian populations and schools. The attached video shows Hamas using sewage pipes and hoses to construct long-range rockets, and an image displays missile depots and launchers inside a mosque and a Gaza youth movement building. Rocket attacks in the early years killed dozens of civilians, with thousands injured despite citizens seeking shelter during rocket alerts. At this point, Israel decided to invest billions in the Iron Dome defense system to protect its citizens. Israel's commitment to protecting all citizens, both Jewish and Arab, contrasts sharply with Hamas. After years of effort, Israel successfully deployed the Iron Dome, boasting a 96% success rate in intercepting rockets aimed at civilian centers. The system identifies and intercepts only those rockets posing a threat to population centers, sparing open areas. Launching such rockets into civilian areas is a war crime, turning launch sites and missile depots into legitimate military targets, even within civilian populations. Imagine the Israeli casualties if Israel hadn't neutralized missile depots or activated the Iron Dome. Now, consider the following data: The cost of producing a Hamas rocket ranges from $100 to several thousand dollars for a more sophisticated one. They use simple materials like cement supplied by the UN, irrigation system pipes, and other basic tools. Israel, on the other hand, invests a significant amount in Iron Dome missiles, with each interceptor costing between $50,000 and $200,000. Israel's annual investment in defense, protecting both its Jewish and Arab citizens, amounts to billions, while Hamas invests billions in developing rockets aimed at killing civilians and in the development of terrorist infrastructure. Since the current conflict began, Hamas has fired over 9,000 rockets at Israel, with over 10% landing within Gaza itself. The Iron Dome intercepted over two thousand rockets, costing nearly $200 million for the entire interceptor supply. Imagine the potential damage if all these rockets hit Israel – thousands of rockets could cause an estimated over a thousand casualties, thousands of injuries, and extensive damage. Hamas' continued rocket fire on Israeli civilians is a war crime. It always has been and always will be. We can no longer turn a blind eye to this. After Hamas carried out a brutal massacre in addition to rocket attacks, we had no other choice. Israel stands on the side of morality and justice. While Hamas fires missiles at civilian populations and commits atrocities against innocent civilians, Israel targets only legitimate military objectives according to international law. Israel uses precision missiles, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, while Hamas fires indiscriminate rockets. Hamas poses a threat to Israeli citizens, committing war crimes without restraint, and it can not continue. In the pictures: the summary of the data written in the post about the Hamas rocket fire and a video of a rocket falling on the road. Imagine how many people could be killed by her. Please share this post. #ChooseYourSide #FreeGazaFromHama #StandWithIsrael #HamasisISIS
0:44

Come and hear about the war crimes committed by Hamas. This is an important post, read it all. I mean, beyond the "usual" things they do, like killing Israeli civilians, LGBTQ+ individuals, and opposition figures in Gaza. This war crime is the relentless rocket fire on Israeli civilians. In 2001, Hamas, the Gaza basee terrorist organization, began independently producing and launching rockets into civilian population centers. Since then, especially after Israel fully withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas' rocket fire intensified, and their launch capabilities expanded significantly. Instead of investing in Gaza's infrastructure, Hamas diverted aid funds, equipment provided by the UN and world governments to build rockets with the sole purpose of indiscriminately killing Israeli civilians. They placed launchers and bomb-making facilities within civilian populations and schools. The attached video shows Hamas using sewage pipes and hoses to construct long-range rockets, and an image displays missile depots and launchers inside a mosque and a Gaza youth movement building. Rocket attacks in the early years killed dozens of civilians, with thousands injured despite citizens seeking shelter during rocket alerts. At this point, Israel decided to invest billions in the Iron Dome defense system to protect its citizens. Israel's commitment to protecting all citizens, both Jewish and Arab, contrasts sharply with Hamas. After years of effort, Israel successfully deployed the Iron Dome, boasting a 96% success rate in intercepting rockets aimed at civilian centers. The system identifies and intercepts only those rockets posing a threat to population centers, sparing open areas. Launching such rockets into civilian areas is a war crime, turning launch sites and missile depots into legitimate military targets, even within civilian populations. Imagine the Israeli casualties if Israel hadn't neutralized missile depots or activated the Iron Dome. Now, consider the following data: The cost of producing a Hamas rocket ranges from $100 to several thousand dollars for a more sophisticated one. They use simple materials like cement supplied by the UN, irrigation system pipes, and other basic tools. Israel, on the other hand, invests a significant amount in Iron Dome missiles, with each interceptor costing between $50,000 and $200,000. Israel's annual investment in defense, protecting both its Jewish and Arab citizens, amounts to billions, while Hamas invests billions in developing rockets aimed at killing civilians and in the development of terrorist infrastructure. Since the current conflict began, Hamas has fired over 9,000 rockets at Israel, with over 10% landing within Gaza itself. The Iron Dome intercepted over two thousand rockets, costing nearly $200 million for the entire interceptor supply. Imagine the potential damage if all these rockets hit Israel – thousands of rockets could cause an estimated over a thousand casualties, thousands of injuries, and extensive damage. Hamas' continued rocket fire on Israeli civilians is a war crime. It always has been and always will be. We can no longer turn a blind eye to this. After Hamas carried out a brutal massacre in addition to rocket attacks, we had no other choice. Israel stands on the side of morality and justice. While Hamas fires missiles at civilian populations and commits atrocities against innocent civilians, Israel targets only legitimate military objectives according to international law. Israel uses precision missiles, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, while Hamas fires indiscriminate rockets. Hamas poses a threat to Israeli citizens, committing war crimes without restraint, and it can not continue. In the pictures: the summary of the data written in the post about the Hamas rocket fire and a video of a rocket falling on the road. Imagine how many people could be killed by her. Please share this post. #ChooseYourSide #FreeGazaFromHama #StandWithIsrael #HamasisISIS

Ori Miller | אורי מילר

404,910 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.
2:27

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

61,575 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When the US glide bomb struck the IRIS Shahid Sayyad Shirazi near Qeshm Island on March 4, the impact triggered an involuntary event that nobody in the coverage has fully examined: the stricken corvette spontaneously launched one of its own anti-ship missiles. The weapon fired itself. Not as a last act of defiance from a crew executing a terminal order. The structural damage from the strike activated the launch sequence without human input. That detail is the most technically significant event in the naval dimension of this war. The Shahid Sayyad Shirazi is the third vessel of the Soleimani-class, the IRGC Navy’s most advanced surface combatant. Pennant FS313-03. Commissioned February 2024. The class was Iran’s answer to the problem of contested littoral warfare in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz: a wave-piercing catamaran hull approximately 65 to 68 meters in length, composite construction designed to reduce radar cross-section, four indigenous diesel engines producing confirmed speeds of 32 knots with promotional claims reaching 45, and an armament package that makes every other ship in its weight class irrelevant by comparison. Six anti-ship cruise missiles of the Noor, Ghadir, or Nasir class on deck launchers. A vertical launch system carrying between six and sixteen Sayad surface-to-air missiles plus additional cells for Abu-Mahdi long-range cruise missiles. Six 20-millimeter Gatling guns. A helipad for a medium combat helicopter. Capacity to deploy three fast-attack boats simultaneously. On a 600-tonne displacement hull. Iran built this ship specifically for the Hormuz chokepoint. The catamaran design provides speed and stability in the confined, shallow waters of the Gulf that a conventional monohull cannot match. The composite hull reduces the radar signature that adversaries need to acquire targeting solutions. The VLS integration gives a vessel of this size a defensive envelope against air attack that most navies reserve for ships four times the displacement. The speed and fast-boat deployment capacity fit exactly into the IRGC Navy’s doctrine of saturation from multiple simultaneous vectors. A US aircraft dropped a single glide bomb. The ship caught fire. It spontaneously launched a missile. CENTCOM confirmed the strike. Multiple cameras captured the burning hull offshore Qeshm Island with smoke rising through the Strait of Hormuz. The spontaneous missile launch is the detail that defines the engagement. A VLS or deck-launched anti-ship missile under normal conditions requires crew input, targeting data, and deliberate firing authorization. When a strike disrupts the electrical and structural integrity of the vessel sufficiently to trigger an unintended launch, the weapon system designed to protect the ship becomes a hazard launched into the Strait of Hormuz at whatever bearing the launcher happened to be pointing. Every tanker, patrol boat, or allied vessel within the weapon’s acquisition envelope during those seconds faced a missile fired by a ship that no longer had a crew in control of it. No second-order casualties were reported from the spontaneous launch. The missile either failed to acquire a target, impacted water, or flew a trajectory that missed occupied vessels. The outcome was fortunate. The mechanism was not controllable. Iran commissioned this ship fourteen months ago. It was designed to be their most dangerous surface unit in the world’s most contested waterway. It fired its own weapon at the waterway it was built to control before going down.
0:42

When the US glide bomb struck the IRIS Shahid Sayyad Shirazi near Qeshm Island on March 4, the impact triggered an involuntary event that nobody in the coverage has fully examined: the stricken corvette spontaneously launched one of its own anti-ship missiles. The weapon fired itself. Not as a last act of defiance from a crew executing a terminal order. The structural damage from the strike activated the launch sequence without human input. That detail is the most technically significant event in the naval dimension of this war. The Shahid Sayyad Shirazi is the third vessel of the Soleimani-class, the IRGC Navy’s most advanced surface combatant. Pennant FS313-03. Commissioned February 2024. The class was Iran’s answer to the problem of contested littoral warfare in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz: a wave-piercing catamaran hull approximately 65 to 68 meters in length, composite construction designed to reduce radar cross-section, four indigenous diesel engines producing confirmed speeds of 32 knots with promotional claims reaching 45, and an armament package that makes every other ship in its weight class irrelevant by comparison. Six anti-ship cruise missiles of the Noor, Ghadir, or Nasir class on deck launchers. A vertical launch system carrying between six and sixteen Sayad surface-to-air missiles plus additional cells for Abu-Mahdi long-range cruise missiles. Six 20-millimeter Gatling guns. A helipad for a medium combat helicopter. Capacity to deploy three fast-attack boats simultaneously. On a 600-tonne displacement hull. Iran built this ship specifically for the Hormuz chokepoint. The catamaran design provides speed and stability in the confined, shallow waters of the Gulf that a conventional monohull cannot match. The composite hull reduces the radar signature that adversaries need to acquire targeting solutions. The VLS integration gives a vessel of this size a defensive envelope against air attack that most navies reserve for ships four times the displacement. The speed and fast-boat deployment capacity fit exactly into the IRGC Navy’s doctrine of saturation from multiple simultaneous vectors. A US aircraft dropped a single glide bomb. The ship caught fire. It spontaneously launched a missile. CENTCOM confirmed the strike. Multiple cameras captured the burning hull offshore Qeshm Island with smoke rising through the Strait of Hormuz. The spontaneous missile launch is the detail that defines the engagement. A VLS or deck-launched anti-ship missile under normal conditions requires crew input, targeting data, and deliberate firing authorization. When a strike disrupts the electrical and structural integrity of the vessel sufficiently to trigger an unintended launch, the weapon system designed to protect the ship becomes a hazard launched into the Strait of Hormuz at whatever bearing the launcher happened to be pointing. Every tanker, patrol boat, or allied vessel within the weapon’s acquisition envelope during those seconds faced a missile fired by a ship that no longer had a crew in control of it. No second-order casualties were reported from the spontaneous launch. The missile either failed to acquire a target, impacted water, or flew a trajectory that missed occupied vessels. The outcome was fortunate. The mechanism was not controllable. Iran commissioned this ship fourteen months ago. It was designed to be their most dangerous surface unit in the world’s most contested waterway. It fired its own weapon at the waterway it was built to control before going down.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

435,326 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/9 - 3/10 • Hezbollah fighting intensifies around Khiam in southern Lebanon • Iranian cluster warhead missile kills one civilian in central Israel • Bahrain refinery strike triggers force majeure amid Gulf escalation • Oil briefly spikes toward $120 as Hormuz threats escalate The last 24 hours did not bring de-escalation. Instead they clarified the next phase of the war. Israel and the United States continue pressing deeper into Iran’s military infrastructure while Iran attempts to widen the battlefield through Hezbollah, Gulf energy pressure, and regional instability. The result is a war that may involve smaller missile salvos than the opening days, but is becoming broader, more economically strategic, and more dangerous regionally. Below is the operational picture. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN Israeli and U.S. strikes continued targeting military and strategic infrastructure inside Iran. Recent targets reportedly included: • missile infrastructure near Tehran • military aviation sites around Mehrabad Airport • IRGC logistical facilities • missile production and sustainment infrastructure Large explosions and fires were again reported near Tehran and around Mehrabad. But the most important shift is strategic, not tactical. The campaign increasingly appears aimed at preventing Iran from regenerating missile capability, not just destroying launchers currently in use. If the opening phase of the war was about suppressing immediate missile attacks, the current phase looks more like a systematic attempt to dismantle the infrastructure required for Iran to rebuild those forces. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued launching missiles toward Israel over the last 24 hours. However, the pattern of attacks continues to evolve. Recent observations indicate: • roughly 6–8 missile waves during the day • smaller salvos than earlier in the war • cluster munitions used to widen impact areas The most serious incident occurred when an Iranian cluster warhead missile struck central Israel, killing one person and injuring others. Cluster warheads disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area, meaning even a single missile can create several impact zones. Salvo trend: Early phase of the war • large coordinated barrages • dozens of missiles launched simultaneously Current phase • smaller groups of missiles • more frequent launch windows • cluster payloads increasing damage footprint This suggests Iran still retains strike capability, but the launcher network enabling large barrages is likely under increasing pressure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚔️ THE LEBANON FRONT: KHIAM BECOMES A FLASHPOINT The most notable battlefield development of the last 24 hours came from southern Lebanon. Fighting around the border town of Khiam intensified, with Hezbollah claiming direct hits on multiple Israeli Merkava tanks during clashes. While battlefield claims remain contested in real time, the fighting represents closer-range contact than most of the cross-border exchanges seen earlier in the war. Israel also confirmed the death of a second soldier in Hezbollah fighting in southern Lebanon. At the same time, Israel continued strikes on Hezbollah command centers and the Al Qard al Hassan financial network, which is used to fund Hezbollah activity. Why this matters: This front is no longer limited to rockets and airstrikes. It is increasingly showing signs of direct tactical engagement. That makes Lebanon potentially the most dangerous front of the war right now. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 IRAN IS PUSHING THE WAR INTO THE GULF Iran continues attempting to export the war into the broader region. The most significant development was a drone strike on Bahrain’s Bapco refinery, which forced the facility to declare force majeure on shipments. The refinery disruption followed earlier damage to desalination infrastructure in Bahrain. At the same time: • drone and missile alerts continued in Saudi Arabia and the UAE • Gulf air defenses remained active across multiple states Iran has also issued explicit threats regarding oil exports and the Strait of Hormuz, declaring that if the war continues it could prevent oil shipments from leaving the region. This reflects a clear Iranian strategy: If Tehran cannot win militarily, it will attempt to raise the economic cost of the war globally. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 GLOBAL MARKETS REACT Energy markets responded immediately to the Gulf escalation. Oil prices briefly surged toward $120 per barrel, reflecting fears that attacks on Gulf infrastructure or shipping lanes could disrupt global energy supply. Even when prices later stabilized, markets made clear they now see the Iran war as a systemic energy risk, not just a regional conflict. That gives Tehran a potential leverage point. Iran’s leadership appears to believe that threatening global energy stability could pressure Western governments to push for a ceasefire. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 THE WAR IS SPREADING ALONG THE PERIPHERY Beyond Iran and Israel, several additional fronts remain active. Recent developments include: • strikes on pro-Iranian militia positions in Iraq • tensions involving Kurdish regions near the Iran-Iraq border • diplomatic reactions following attacks on Gulf states The pattern increasingly resembles a regional pressure network, rather than a single bilateral war. Iran does not need every proxy front to win. It only needs enough instability across multiple fronts to complicate U.S. and Israeli strategy. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war in the past 24 hours. 1️⃣ The Lebanon front may now be the most dangerous battlefield. The fighting around Khiam suggests Hezbollah is capable of imposing real tactical costs. 2️⃣ Iran is expanding the conflict through energy and Gulf instability. Strikes on refineries and desalination infrastructure show Tehran’s willingness to escalate economically. 3️⃣ The air campaign is shifting toward long-term denial of Iran’s missile capability. Israel and the U.S. appear increasingly focused on preventing Iran from rebuilding its strike infrastructure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT
0:20

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/9 - 3/10 • Hezbollah fighting intensifies around Khiam in southern Lebanon • Iranian cluster warhead missile kills one civilian in central Israel • Bahrain refinery strike triggers force majeure amid Gulf escalation • Oil briefly spikes toward $120 as Hormuz threats escalate The last 24 hours did not bring de-escalation. Instead they clarified the next phase of the war. Israel and the United States continue pressing deeper into Iran’s military infrastructure while Iran attempts to widen the battlefield through Hezbollah, Gulf energy pressure, and regional instability. The result is a war that may involve smaller missile salvos than the opening days, but is becoming broader, more economically strategic, and more dangerous regionally. Below is the operational picture. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN Israeli and U.S. strikes continued targeting military and strategic infrastructure inside Iran. Recent targets reportedly included: • missile infrastructure near Tehran • military aviation sites around Mehrabad Airport • IRGC logistical facilities • missile production and sustainment infrastructure Large explosions and fires were again reported near Tehran and around Mehrabad. But the most important shift is strategic, not tactical. The campaign increasingly appears aimed at preventing Iran from regenerating missile capability, not just destroying launchers currently in use. If the opening phase of the war was about suppressing immediate missile attacks, the current phase looks more like a systematic attempt to dismantle the infrastructure required for Iran to rebuild those forces. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued launching missiles toward Israel over the last 24 hours. However, the pattern of attacks continues to evolve. Recent observations indicate: • roughly 6–8 missile waves during the day • smaller salvos than earlier in the war • cluster munitions used to widen impact areas The most serious incident occurred when an Iranian cluster warhead missile struck central Israel, killing one person and injuring others. Cluster warheads disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area, meaning even a single missile can create several impact zones. Salvo trend: Early phase of the war • large coordinated barrages • dozens of missiles launched simultaneously Current phase • smaller groups of missiles • more frequent launch windows • cluster payloads increasing damage footprint This suggests Iran still retains strike capability, but the launcher network enabling large barrages is likely under increasing pressure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚔️ THE LEBANON FRONT: KHIAM BECOMES A FLASHPOINT The most notable battlefield development of the last 24 hours came from southern Lebanon. Fighting around the border town of Khiam intensified, with Hezbollah claiming direct hits on multiple Israeli Merkava tanks during clashes. While battlefield claims remain contested in real time, the fighting represents closer-range contact than most of the cross-border exchanges seen earlier in the war. Israel also confirmed the death of a second soldier in Hezbollah fighting in southern Lebanon. At the same time, Israel continued strikes on Hezbollah command centers and the Al Qard al Hassan financial network, which is used to fund Hezbollah activity. Why this matters: This front is no longer limited to rockets and airstrikes. It is increasingly showing signs of direct tactical engagement. That makes Lebanon potentially the most dangerous front of the war right now. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 IRAN IS PUSHING THE WAR INTO THE GULF Iran continues attempting to export the war into the broader region. The most significant development was a drone strike on Bahrain’s Bapco refinery, which forced the facility to declare force majeure on shipments. The refinery disruption followed earlier damage to desalination infrastructure in Bahrain. At the same time: • drone and missile alerts continued in Saudi Arabia and the UAE • Gulf air defenses remained active across multiple states Iran has also issued explicit threats regarding oil exports and the Strait of Hormuz, declaring that if the war continues it could prevent oil shipments from leaving the region. This reflects a clear Iranian strategy: If Tehran cannot win militarily, it will attempt to raise the economic cost of the war globally. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 GLOBAL MARKETS REACT Energy markets responded immediately to the Gulf escalation. Oil prices briefly surged toward $120 per barrel, reflecting fears that attacks on Gulf infrastructure or shipping lanes could disrupt global energy supply. Even when prices later stabilized, markets made clear they now see the Iran war as a systemic energy risk, not just a regional conflict. That gives Tehran a potential leverage point. Iran’s leadership appears to believe that threatening global energy stability could pressure Western governments to push for a ceasefire. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 THE WAR IS SPREADING ALONG THE PERIPHERY Beyond Iran and Israel, several additional fronts remain active. Recent developments include: • strikes on pro-Iranian militia positions in Iraq • tensions involving Kurdish regions near the Iran-Iraq border • diplomatic reactions following attacks on Gulf states The pattern increasingly resembles a regional pressure network, rather than a single bilateral war. Iran does not need every proxy front to win. It only needs enough instability across multiple fronts to complicate U.S. and Israeli strategy. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war in the past 24 hours. 1️⃣ The Lebanon front may now be the most dangerous battlefield. The fighting around Khiam suggests Hezbollah is capable of imposing real tactical costs. 2️⃣ Iran is expanding the conflict through energy and Gulf instability. Strikes on refineries and desalination infrastructure show Tehran’s willingness to escalate economically. 3️⃣ The air campaign is shifting toward long-term denial of Iran’s missile capability. Israel and the U.S. appear increasingly focused on preventing Iran from rebuilding its strike infrastructure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT

Inside_Israel_Intel

28,875 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

BREAKING: While the world debates whether Trump’s “productive conversations” are real, the United States eliminated 10 Iran-backed PMF fighters and the Anbar operations chief during a commanders’ meeting in western Iraq. Thirty wounded. The strike was precision-targeted at a headquarters coordinating attacks on US forces across the region. This happened during what headlines are calling a “pause.” Here is what the pause actually is. President Trump’s 5-day suspension applies to one category: Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. That restraint was a deliberate choice to protect 88 million Iranian civilians from a blackout that would collapse hospitals, water systems, and emergency services. It was not weakness. It was the decision of a president who holds the capacity to destroy Iran’s entire grid in “one shot” and chose not to, buying time for diplomacy that could save millions of lives on both sides. Everything outside that protected category continues with full intensity because it must. The IRGC headquarters that plan missile strikes on Israeli civilians are being dismantled. The launcher sites that fire cluster munitions at Tel Aviv at 3 AM are being hunted. The missile production facilities that build the Khorramshahr-4s carrying Soviet-era designs upgraded with Chinese components are being destroyed. The nuclear scientists who could rebuild the programme that threatens the entire region are being removed from the equation. The PMF commanders who coordinate Iranian proxy attacks on American service members are being targeted. The IDF dropped over 100 precision munitions on Tehran overnight, striking Quds Force command posts, IRGC intelligence centres, and warhead research facilities. These are military targets. These are the command nodes of an apparatus that has fired hundreds of ballistic missiles at civilian populations. Now look at what Iran and its proxies are doing with their “pause.” Overnight cluster munitions fell on Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Kiryat Shmona. Not military bases. Residential neighbourhoods. Hezbollah fired rockets into northern Israeli communities. Houthis continued attacking commercial shipping in the Red Sea, threatening the livelihoods of sailors from dozens of nations who have nothing to do with this war. Iranian drones targeted Gulf desalination plants that produce drinking water for millions. The electricity ledger Iran published on live television was not a statement of restraint. It was a target list: “Strike electricity and we strike electricity.” Iran is openly promising to attack the infrastructure that keeps civilian populations alive across an entire region. The contrast is structural. The United States paused strikes on civilian infrastructure to create space for talks. Iran used that same space to fire cluster munitions at residential areas and threaten regional power grids. Israel is striking military headquarters and missile factories. Iran is striking apartment buildings and threatening desalination plants. One side drew a line to protect civilians. The other side is using the protection as cover to target them. Trump is simultaneously fighting and negotiating because that is how wars end. The Islamabad channel is being prepared. Ghalibaf is being evaluated. The 82nd Airborne is positioning. The IDF is hunting 140 remaining launchers. The power-plant pause holds because both sides understand that crossing the electricity line turns a war into a civilisational collapse. But everything below that line, every headquarters, every launcher, every proxy command post, every production facility, continues to be degraded methodically, precisely, and relentlessly. The pause protects Iranian civilians from their own government’s decision to start a war. The strikes protect Israeli, Gulf, and American civilians from that same government’s decision to continue it. Full analysis:
0:22

BREAKING: While the world debates whether Trump’s “productive conversations” are real, the United States eliminated 10 Iran-backed PMF fighters and the Anbar operations chief during a commanders’ meeting in western Iraq. Thirty wounded. The strike was precision-targeted at a headquarters coordinating attacks on US forces across the region. This happened during what headlines are calling a “pause.” Here is what the pause actually is. President Trump’s 5-day suspension applies to one category: Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. That restraint was a deliberate choice to protect 88 million Iranian civilians from a blackout that would collapse hospitals, water systems, and emergency services. It was not weakness. It was the decision of a president who holds the capacity to destroy Iran’s entire grid in “one shot” and chose not to, buying time for diplomacy that could save millions of lives on both sides. Everything outside that protected category continues with full intensity because it must. The IRGC headquarters that plan missile strikes on Israeli civilians are being dismantled. The launcher sites that fire cluster munitions at Tel Aviv at 3 AM are being hunted. The missile production facilities that build the Khorramshahr-4s carrying Soviet-era designs upgraded with Chinese components are being destroyed. The nuclear scientists who could rebuild the programme that threatens the entire region are being removed from the equation. The PMF commanders who coordinate Iranian proxy attacks on American service members are being targeted. The IDF dropped over 100 precision munitions on Tehran overnight, striking Quds Force command posts, IRGC intelligence centres, and warhead research facilities. These are military targets. These are the command nodes of an apparatus that has fired hundreds of ballistic missiles at civilian populations. Now look at what Iran and its proxies are doing with their “pause.” Overnight cluster munitions fell on Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Kiryat Shmona. Not military bases. Residential neighbourhoods. Hezbollah fired rockets into northern Israeli communities. Houthis continued attacking commercial shipping in the Red Sea, threatening the livelihoods of sailors from dozens of nations who have nothing to do with this war. Iranian drones targeted Gulf desalination plants that produce drinking water for millions. The electricity ledger Iran published on live television was not a statement of restraint. It was a target list: “Strike electricity and we strike electricity.” Iran is openly promising to attack the infrastructure that keeps civilian populations alive across an entire region. The contrast is structural. The United States paused strikes on civilian infrastructure to create space for talks. Iran used that same space to fire cluster munitions at residential areas and threaten regional power grids. Israel is striking military headquarters and missile factories. Iran is striking apartment buildings and threatening desalination plants. One side drew a line to protect civilians. The other side is using the protection as cover to target them. Trump is simultaneously fighting and negotiating because that is how wars end. The Islamabad channel is being prepared. Ghalibaf is being evaluated. The 82nd Airborne is positioning. The IDF is hunting 140 remaining launchers. The power-plant pause holds because both sides understand that crossing the electricity line turns a war into a civilisational collapse. But everything below that line, every headquarters, every launcher, every proxy command post, every production facility, continues to be degraded methodically, precisely, and relentlessly. The pause protects Iranian civilians from their own government’s decision to start a war. The strikes protect Israeli, Gulf, and American civilians from that same government’s decision to continue it. Full analysis:

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

118,293 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ A church school in Minneapolis was targeted in a mass shooting by Robin Westman. It left two children dead and 17 injured during morning Mass. Westman, 23, died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound after opening fire on the children aged 8-16. 2.⁠ Trump issued a proclamation directing all U.S flags to be flown at half-staff through August 31 in response to the shooting. He called for everyone to join him in praying for everyone involved. 3.⁠ Russia launched another massive overnight drone and missile attack on Ukraine, killing at least 14 people, including 3 children, and hitting the EU’s offices in Kyiv. 4.⁠ The UK, France, and Germany are preparing to trigger the UN “snapback” mechanism today, reimposing sanctions on Iran after its failure to resume nuclear talks with Washington or fully cooperate with inspectors. 5.⁠ Satellite images showed Russian Northern Fleet submarine pens nearly deserted, with cruise missile, ballistic missile, and attack subs deployed at sea. Analysts suggested Moscow may be reacting to recent shifts in U.S and NATO nuclear submarine posture. 6.⁠ SpaceX broke another record with one its Falcon 9 boosters launching and landing 30 times, marking the first orbital-class rocket to be reused this many times. Every touchdown is still a magic trick: a 15-story cylinder drops from orbit, flips, fires, and nails the bullseye on a floating barge in the Atlantic. 7.⁠ House Oversight Chair James Comer and Rep. Nancy Mace sent a letter to Wikipedia’s CEO demanding records on foreign influence and manipulation of the platform. Lawmakers flagged studies showing coordinated attempts to insert antisemitic and anti-Israel content, and to push Kremlin-backed narratives into Western media via Wikipedia edits and AI chatbots. 8.⁠ Sweden announced it has built a new low-cost solution to take out drones. Manufactured by Saab, the company that gave us quirky hatchbacks, the new missile system, Nimbrix, has a 5km range and air-burst warheads that can shred drone swarms instead of just one target. 9.⁠ It was revealed that when Trump’s tariff barrage on China escalated in March, Xi Jinping sent a secret letter to Modi, urging stronger ties and warning against U.S trade deals that could hurt China. 10.⁠ Trump fired CDC Director Susan Monarez just 4 weeks after she took office, making hers the shortest CDC tenure in history. However, her legal team hit back, claiming she had not stepped down nor received any notice from the White House of her termination.
0:47

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ A church school in Minneapolis was targeted in a mass shooting by Robin Westman. It left two children dead and 17 injured during morning Mass. Westman, 23, died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound after opening fire on the children aged 8-16. 2.⁠ Trump issued a proclamation directing all U.S flags to be flown at half-staff through August 31 in response to the shooting. He called for everyone to join him in praying for everyone involved. 3.⁠ Russia launched another massive overnight drone and missile attack on Ukraine, killing at least 14 people, including 3 children, and hitting the EU’s offices in Kyiv. 4.⁠ The UK, France, and Germany are preparing to trigger the UN “snapback” mechanism today, reimposing sanctions on Iran after its failure to resume nuclear talks with Washington or fully cooperate with inspectors. 5.⁠ Satellite images showed Russian Northern Fleet submarine pens nearly deserted, with cruise missile, ballistic missile, and attack subs deployed at sea. Analysts suggested Moscow may be reacting to recent shifts in U.S and NATO nuclear submarine posture. 6.⁠ SpaceX broke another record with one its Falcon 9 boosters launching and landing 30 times, marking the first orbital-class rocket to be reused this many times. Every touchdown is still a magic trick: a 15-story cylinder drops from orbit, flips, fires, and nails the bullseye on a floating barge in the Atlantic. 7.⁠ House Oversight Chair James Comer and Rep. Nancy Mace sent a letter to Wikipedia’s CEO demanding records on foreign influence and manipulation of the platform. Lawmakers flagged studies showing coordinated attempts to insert antisemitic and anti-Israel content, and to push Kremlin-backed narratives into Western media via Wikipedia edits and AI chatbots. 8.⁠ Sweden announced it has built a new low-cost solution to take out drones. Manufactured by Saab, the company that gave us quirky hatchbacks, the new missile system, Nimbrix, has a 5km range and air-burst warheads that can shred drone swarms instead of just one target. 9.⁠ It was revealed that when Trump’s tariff barrage on China escalated in March, Xi Jinping sent a secret letter to Modi, urging stronger ties and warning against U.S trade deals that could hurt China. 10.⁠ Trump fired CDC Director Susan Monarez just 4 weeks after she took office, making hers the shortest CDC tenure in history. However, her legal team hit back, claiming she had not stepped down nor received any notice from the White House of her termination.

Mario Nawfal

107,961 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: LAST 24 HOURS • Iranian missiles struck Tel Aviv and northern Israel, causing injuries and structural damage • Israel expanded strikes across Iran, including Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, Bandar Abbas, and missile infrastructure sites • U.S.–Israel strikes hit senior PMF infrastructure in Iraq, killing key commanders • Reported strikes on Iranian gas infrastructure in Isfahan and Khorramshahr signal a potential shift toward energy targeting • Lebanon intensified with evacuations, Rashidiya strikes, and continued Hezbollah fire • Trump abruptly pivoted to negotiations with Iran and extended the Hormuz deadline, delaying a major escalation The past 24 hours were not defined by a single headline event, but by a combination of very real battlefield activity and a sudden political shift at the top level. On the ground, the war remained active across every front: Israel, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and the Gulf. At the same time, the expected U.S. escalation tied to Hormuz did not happen. Instead, Washington pivoted toward negotiations, with Trump claiming talks are close to agreement while Iran publicly denies that anything meaningful is underway. That combination, ongoing war with a simultaneous negotiation track, is new. And it matters. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued missile launches into Israel, with a clear pattern of split targeting between central and northern sectors. A missile hit in Tel Aviv injured several civilians and damaged nearby residential structures. Later waves triggered wide alert zones across northern Israel, including the Galilee, Golan, and confrontation line communities. Your outbox tracked these alerts across dozens of locations in real time. There were also additional impacts from fragments and debris, including a schoolyard hit and damage to homes in the north without mass casualties. This continues a trend seen over the last several days: • lower salvo size • wider disruption footprint • sustained daily pressure Iran is no longer relying on large coordinated barrages. It is maintaining pressure through frequency, geography, and effect per missile. At the same time, Israeli officials continue to investigate interception gaps, including earlier failures tied to THAAD systems, reinforcing that even a degraded Iranian launcher network can still produce meaningful results. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN The Israeli and U.S. strike campaign inside Iran remained broad, multi-layered, and geographically extensive. Mainstream reporting confirmed strikes on: • missile storage and production facilities • regime and intelligence headquarters in Tehran • additional infrastructure in Isfahan and surrounding regions Open source intel shows how wide this really was. Strikes or explosions were reported across: • Tehran (multiple districts including eastern sectors and Parchin-adjacent areas) • Tabriz • Khuzestan and Dezful • Bandar Abbas and coastal nodes • Yazd and missile infrastructure There were also multiple reports of targeted assassination strikes, destruction of missile-related infrastructure, and pressure on internal security nodes This matters because the campaign is not narrowing. It is hitting production, command, logistics, and leadership. This is a system-wide degradation effort, not a tactical suppression campaign. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚡ ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE: THE WAR IS GETTING CLOSER TO THE GRID One of the most important developments in this window was the reported targeting of Iranian gas infrastructure. Reuters reported a gas company office and pressure reduction station hit in Isfahan and a pipeline feeding a power station in Khorramshahr struck At the same time, oil prices rose again as markets reacted to continued Hormuz disruption, uncertainty around negotiations, and risk of escalation into full infrastructure targeting Open source intel strongly corroborates these reports, with repeated references to the same targets and follow-on rhetoric about retaliatory strikes on regional power systems. This is the key shift. The war is moving from military systems toward civilian energy systems. Not fully yet, but clearly closer. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇮🇶 IRAQ: PROXY COMMAND STRUCTURE HIT The Iraq front escalated meaningfully. Reuters reported that strikes hit: • PMF headquarters in Anbar • a residence tied to PMF leadership Casualties included at least 15 fighters killed, dozens wounded, and the confirmed death of operations commander Saad al-Baiji. Open source intel confirmed this in real time, including militant messaging and follow-on threats against U.S. positions. This was not a minor militia strike. It was a hit on central PMF command infrastructure. That keeps Iraq as an active and important front, not just a background theater. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇱🇧 LEBANON: PRESSURE CONTINUES AND DEEPENS The Lebanon front remained highly active. Key developments included evacuation warnings north of the Zahrani River, Israeli strikes near Rashidiya and southern Lebanon infrastructure, and continued Hezbollah rocket fire into northern Israel. Open source intel tracked: • strike activity near Rashidiya refugee camp • additional targeted strikes in Bchamoun • repeated northern Israeli alerts Israel continues shifting toward targeting infrastructure, limiting movement, and shaping the battlefield. Hezbollah remains active, but increasingly constrained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 WASHINGTON, TEHRAN, AND THE NEGOTIATION TRACK In a sharp pivot, Trump announced that the U.S. is now holding talks with Iran, the Hormuz deadline was extended, and discussions are “close to agreement”. From there markets reacted immediately with oil prices dropping and then global markets rallying. But the reality is far less clear. Iranian leadership denied meaningful negotiations, and then demanded compensation and guarantees as new conditions for an any agreement, including limiting U.S. presence in the Gulf There is also uncertainty about who the U.S. is even talking to. Reports suggest contact with Mohammad Ghalibaf rather than Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not been seen publicly. At the same time, there is a deeper shift: The U.S. may now be willing to end the war without full regime change. That is a major departure from earlier expectations. Meanwhile, Israel is trying to ensure any deal reflects its interests, with Netanyahu reportedly engaging directly with the administration. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war right now. 1️⃣ The battlefield remains fully active across all fronts. Missiles, strikes, Lebanon operations, and Gulf pressure all continued in this window. 2️⃣ The war is moving closer to energy infrastructure targeting. Isfahan and Khorramshahr are early signals of a potentially much more dangerous phase. 3️⃣ Negotiations have entered the picture, but nothing is settled. The war is still being fought at full intensity even as diplomacy begins. Bottom line, this was not just another day of escalation. It was the first clear moment where war and negotiations are happening at the same time. That creates a new dynamic: • escalation is still real • pressure is still increasing • but the outcome is now less predictable than it was 24 hours ago Quick note... big thanks to Michael W for contributing to the open-source intel picture behind these updates. If you’re serious about following this war and the broader geopolitical landscape, he’s worth having in your feed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT
0:30

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: LAST 24 HOURS • Iranian missiles struck Tel Aviv and northern Israel, causing injuries and structural damage • Israel expanded strikes across Iran, including Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, Bandar Abbas, and missile infrastructure sites • U.S.–Israel strikes hit senior PMF infrastructure in Iraq, killing key commanders • Reported strikes on Iranian gas infrastructure in Isfahan and Khorramshahr signal a potential shift toward energy targeting • Lebanon intensified with evacuations, Rashidiya strikes, and continued Hezbollah fire • Trump abruptly pivoted to negotiations with Iran and extended the Hormuz deadline, delaying a major escalation The past 24 hours were not defined by a single headline event, but by a combination of very real battlefield activity and a sudden political shift at the top level. On the ground, the war remained active across every front: Israel, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and the Gulf. At the same time, the expected U.S. escalation tied to Hormuz did not happen. Instead, Washington pivoted toward negotiations, with Trump claiming talks are close to agreement while Iran publicly denies that anything meaningful is underway. That combination, ongoing war with a simultaneous negotiation track, is new. And it matters. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued missile launches into Israel, with a clear pattern of split targeting between central and northern sectors. A missile hit in Tel Aviv injured several civilians and damaged nearby residential structures. Later waves triggered wide alert zones across northern Israel, including the Galilee, Golan, and confrontation line communities. Your outbox tracked these alerts across dozens of locations in real time. There were also additional impacts from fragments and debris, including a schoolyard hit and damage to homes in the north without mass casualties. This continues a trend seen over the last several days: • lower salvo size • wider disruption footprint • sustained daily pressure Iran is no longer relying on large coordinated barrages. It is maintaining pressure through frequency, geography, and effect per missile. At the same time, Israeli officials continue to investigate interception gaps, including earlier failures tied to THAAD systems, reinforcing that even a degraded Iranian launcher network can still produce meaningful results. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN The Israeli and U.S. strike campaign inside Iran remained broad, multi-layered, and geographically extensive. Mainstream reporting confirmed strikes on: • missile storage and production facilities • regime and intelligence headquarters in Tehran • additional infrastructure in Isfahan and surrounding regions Open source intel shows how wide this really was. Strikes or explosions were reported across: • Tehran (multiple districts including eastern sectors and Parchin-adjacent areas) • Tabriz • Khuzestan and Dezful • Bandar Abbas and coastal nodes • Yazd and missile infrastructure There were also multiple reports of targeted assassination strikes, destruction of missile-related infrastructure, and pressure on internal security nodes This matters because the campaign is not narrowing. It is hitting production, command, logistics, and leadership. This is a system-wide degradation effort, not a tactical suppression campaign. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚡ ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE: THE WAR IS GETTING CLOSER TO THE GRID One of the most important developments in this window was the reported targeting of Iranian gas infrastructure. Reuters reported a gas company office and pressure reduction station hit in Isfahan and a pipeline feeding a power station in Khorramshahr struck At the same time, oil prices rose again as markets reacted to continued Hormuz disruption, uncertainty around negotiations, and risk of escalation into full infrastructure targeting Open source intel strongly corroborates these reports, with repeated references to the same targets and follow-on rhetoric about retaliatory strikes on regional power systems. This is the key shift. The war is moving from military systems toward civilian energy systems. Not fully yet, but clearly closer. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇮🇶 IRAQ: PROXY COMMAND STRUCTURE HIT The Iraq front escalated meaningfully. Reuters reported that strikes hit: • PMF headquarters in Anbar • a residence tied to PMF leadership Casualties included at least 15 fighters killed, dozens wounded, and the confirmed death of operations commander Saad al-Baiji. Open source intel confirmed this in real time, including militant messaging and follow-on threats against U.S. positions. This was not a minor militia strike. It was a hit on central PMF command infrastructure. That keeps Iraq as an active and important front, not just a background theater. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇱🇧 LEBANON: PRESSURE CONTINUES AND DEEPENS The Lebanon front remained highly active. Key developments included evacuation warnings north of the Zahrani River, Israeli strikes near Rashidiya and southern Lebanon infrastructure, and continued Hezbollah rocket fire into northern Israel. Open source intel tracked: • strike activity near Rashidiya refugee camp • additional targeted strikes in Bchamoun • repeated northern Israeli alerts Israel continues shifting toward targeting infrastructure, limiting movement, and shaping the battlefield. Hezbollah remains active, but increasingly constrained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 WASHINGTON, TEHRAN, AND THE NEGOTIATION TRACK In a sharp pivot, Trump announced that the U.S. is now holding talks with Iran, the Hormuz deadline was extended, and discussions are “close to agreement”. From there markets reacted immediately with oil prices dropping and then global markets rallying. But the reality is far less clear. Iranian leadership denied meaningful negotiations, and then demanded compensation and guarantees as new conditions for an any agreement, including limiting U.S. presence in the Gulf There is also uncertainty about who the U.S. is even talking to. Reports suggest contact with Mohammad Ghalibaf rather than Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not been seen publicly. At the same time, there is a deeper shift: The U.S. may now be willing to end the war without full regime change. That is a major departure from earlier expectations. Meanwhile, Israel is trying to ensure any deal reflects its interests, with Netanyahu reportedly engaging directly with the administration. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war right now. 1️⃣ The battlefield remains fully active across all fronts. Missiles, strikes, Lebanon operations, and Gulf pressure all continued in this window. 2️⃣ The war is moving closer to energy infrastructure targeting. Isfahan and Khorramshahr are early signals of a potentially much more dangerous phase. 3️⃣ Negotiations have entered the picture, but nothing is settled. The war is still being fought at full intensity even as diplomacy begins. Bottom line, this was not just another day of escalation. It was the first clear moment where war and negotiations are happening at the same time. That creates a new dynamic: • escalation is still real • pressure is still increasing • but the outcome is now less predictable than it was 24 hours ago Quick note... big thanks to Michael W for contributing to the open-source intel picture behind these updates. If you’re serious about following this war and the broader geopolitical landscape, he’s worth having in your feed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT

Inside_Israel_Intel

37,207 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨The HIMARS at the Foot of Fuji Was Not a Drill. It Was a Message. Three signals from three cities. One target. One 24-hour window. Beijing was always going to hear it. Just after 2 p.m. Tokyo time on Wednesday, a platoon of about fifty U.S. Marines from the 3rd Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment — Okinawa-based, ordinarily stationed within sight of the Taiwan Strait — rolled two HIMARS launchers onto the East Fuji Maneuver Area and fired two salvos. Six rockets. Pause. Six more. The launchers then did what they were built to do: pulled back from the firing line and disappeared. The Marines call this "shoot and scoot." In the age of cheap drones and counter-battery radar, it is no longer a clever tactic — it is the difference between a launcher that fights tomorrow and a launcher that is a smoking ruin within ninety seconds. The Pentagon framed the exercise in routine terms. Live-fire training. Readiness. Allied interoperability. "Reinforcing our commitment to regional security and the defense of Japan," the division spokesman wrote in his April briefing email. Many legacy media outlets reported it as a drill. Second consecutive year at this location. Nothing to see. That framing is technically correct and strategically blind. Because of what else happened on May 20. In Taipei, Lai Ching-te marked his second anniversary in office, halfway through his term, with a press conference reaffirming that Taiwan's future will not be decided by external forces and that arms procurement from the United States is essential to peace. In Washington, president Donald Trump walked onto the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews and told reporters he would speak with Lai personally — the first sitting U.S. president-to-sitting Taiwanese president call since the United States switched recognition to Beijing in 1979. And in Shizuoka Prefecture, on a maneuver area visible to local farmers and a 72-year-old former Japanese soldier watching from a hilltop in Gotemba, twelve American rockets arced into the foothills of Japan's most photographed mountain. Three events. Three cities. Same calendar day. You can call that coincidence if you want. The people who plan exercises eighteen months in advance, coordinate them with Japan's Ministry of Defense by formal email in April, and clear them with three different theater command headquarters do not believe in that kind of coincidence. Here is what the HIMARS at Fuji actually means in the wider picture. The system, as configured for Wednesday's drill, is short-range. But HIMARS is a platform, not a weapon. Swap the standard pod for the Precision Strike Missile and the same truck can put a warhead 500 kilometers downrange — from Yonaguni, from the Senkakus, from the Batanes islands the U.S. Army has been quietly deploying to since last year, that arc covers the Taiwan Strait and a meaningful portion of the southern Chinese coast. Beijing has spent two decades and several hundred billion dollars building an Anti-Access/Area Denial system designed around one assumption: that American power projection in the Western Pacific depends on a handful of large, fixed, exquisite platforms — carrier groups, Kadena, Guam. The DF-26 is called the "Guam Killer" for a reason. The entire bet is that if you can credibly threaten those platforms, the United States will not show up. A truck that fires twelve rockets and disappears into the tree line breaks that bet. There is no "Guam Killer" for a HIMARS battery that moves every forty minutes across an archipelago of forty-six inhabited islands the U.S. and Japan jointly operate. You cannot pre-target what you cannot find. This was the message Beijing received on Wednesday afternoon. Trump's announcement told them the political ceiling has been raised. Lai's anniversary speech told them Taipei is not negotiating its sovereignty. The rockets at Fuji told them the military floor has been raised too — and that the floor is mobile, distributed, and very difficult to break. The bell that has been ringing all week did not stop at the phone call. It rang again at 2 p.m. in the shadow of Mount Fuji. And the next time it rings, it may not be a training round. Original post by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss!
0:31

🚨The HIMARS at the Foot of Fuji Was Not a Drill. It Was a Message. Three signals from three cities. One target. One 24-hour window. Beijing was always going to hear it. Just after 2 p.m. Tokyo time on Wednesday, a platoon of about fifty U.S. Marines from the 3rd Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment — Okinawa-based, ordinarily stationed within sight of the Taiwan Strait — rolled two HIMARS launchers onto the East Fuji Maneuver Area and fired two salvos. Six rockets. Pause. Six more. The launchers then did what they were built to do: pulled back from the firing line and disappeared. The Marines call this "shoot and scoot." In the age of cheap drones and counter-battery radar, it is no longer a clever tactic — it is the difference between a launcher that fights tomorrow and a launcher that is a smoking ruin within ninety seconds. The Pentagon framed the exercise in routine terms. Live-fire training. Readiness. Allied interoperability. "Reinforcing our commitment to regional security and the defense of Japan," the division spokesman wrote in his April briefing email. Many legacy media outlets reported it as a drill. Second consecutive year at this location. Nothing to see. That framing is technically correct and strategically blind. Because of what else happened on May 20. In Taipei, Lai Ching-te marked his second anniversary in office, halfway through his term, with a press conference reaffirming that Taiwan's future will not be decided by external forces and that arms procurement from the United States is essential to peace. In Washington, president Donald Trump walked onto the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews and told reporters he would speak with Lai personally — the first sitting U.S. president-to-sitting Taiwanese president call since the United States switched recognition to Beijing in 1979. And in Shizuoka Prefecture, on a maneuver area visible to local farmers and a 72-year-old former Japanese soldier watching from a hilltop in Gotemba, twelve American rockets arced into the foothills of Japan's most photographed mountain. Three events. Three cities. Same calendar day. You can call that coincidence if you want. The people who plan exercises eighteen months in advance, coordinate them with Japan's Ministry of Defense by formal email in April, and clear them with three different theater command headquarters do not believe in that kind of coincidence. Here is what the HIMARS at Fuji actually means in the wider picture. The system, as configured for Wednesday's drill, is short-range. But HIMARS is a platform, not a weapon. Swap the standard pod for the Precision Strike Missile and the same truck can put a warhead 500 kilometers downrange — from Yonaguni, from the Senkakus, from the Batanes islands the U.S. Army has been quietly deploying to since last year, that arc covers the Taiwan Strait and a meaningful portion of the southern Chinese coast. Beijing has spent two decades and several hundred billion dollars building an Anti-Access/Area Denial system designed around one assumption: that American power projection in the Western Pacific depends on a handful of large, fixed, exquisite platforms — carrier groups, Kadena, Guam. The DF-26 is called the "Guam Killer" for a reason. The entire bet is that if you can credibly threaten those platforms, the United States will not show up. A truck that fires twelve rockets and disappears into the tree line breaks that bet. There is no "Guam Killer" for a HIMARS battery that moves every forty minutes across an archipelago of forty-six inhabited islands the U.S. and Japan jointly operate. You cannot pre-target what you cannot find. This was the message Beijing received on Wednesday afternoon. Trump's announcement told them the political ceiling has been raised. Lai's anniversary speech told them Taipei is not negotiating its sovereignty. The rockets at Fuji told them the military floor has been raised too — and that the floor is mobile, distributed, and very difficult to break. The bell that has been ringing all week did not stop at the phone call. It rang again at 2 p.m. in the shadow of Mount Fuji. And the next time it rings, it may not be a training round. Original post by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss!

Aric Chen

109,283 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Zipline has always done things the “wrong” way. They launched a drone company when drones were essentially illegal in the US. They moved the whole team to trailers on a farm in Half Moon Bay to figure out how to fly. Their launcher was deep sea fishing poles from Walmart. Their landing pads were made by a bouncy castle company. They went to Rwanda with no aviation experience, no logistics experience, no healthcare experience. Co-founder and CEO Keller Cliffton wore tennis shoes and a hoodie to meet the president of the country. The night before the launch, he was on his back in the dirt with a screwdriver in his mouth, trying to rebuild a launcher that kept destroying itself, while the president's special forces watched. The aircraft flew. Keller was just as surprised as everyone else. Nine months of all-nighters after that Rwanda launch, they got one hospital working reliably. Then 20 more in three months. Then 50. Then 400. Today Zipline serves 5,000 hospitals globally and has flown 135 million autonomous miles. To find the best hardware builders in the world, Zipline often hires teenagers. Not as interns fetching coffee — as engineers who own real work. One kid joined at 15 and got offered $180K to lead a team of mechanical engineers instead of going to Stanford. He took it. Another applicant had built a full GPS system for a 3D-printed quadcopter using onboard Nvidia GPUs. While at boarding school. Keller's question for candidates: what have you built? Keller summarized everything in one line: "We specialize in turning the impossible into the merely late." He shares Zipline’s wild origin story in full in our conversation on In Depth. Timestamps: 02:11 Why Zipline doesn't hire for experience 06:04 Are founders born or made? 07:37 Why Zipline hires 17-year-olds over PhDs 17:03 The employees Zipline doesn't want 18:53 The ultimate startup hire is a "heat-seeking missile" 20:36 Why blind references are a non-negotiable 23:07 Can candidates admit when they screwed up? 30:10 Zipline's secret leadership playbook 35:16 Why you should always fire quickly 36:26 The early vision for Zipline 39:48 How Zipline almost died - twice 44:55 From toy robots to drone delivery: Zipline's pivot 51:35 How Rwanda's health minister changed everything 57:10 Why Zipline's launch was a "complete disaster" 1:04:05 Scaling from 1 hospital to 5000 1:05:17 The 10x hardware cost rule every founder should know
1:13:21

Zipline has always done things the “wrong” way. They launched a drone company when drones were essentially illegal in the US. They moved the whole team to trailers on a farm in Half Moon Bay to figure out how to fly. Their launcher was deep sea fishing poles from Walmart. Their landing pads were made by a bouncy castle company. They went to Rwanda with no aviation experience, no logistics experience, no healthcare experience. Co-founder and CEO Keller Cliffton wore tennis shoes and a hoodie to meet the president of the country. The night before the launch, he was on his back in the dirt with a screwdriver in his mouth, trying to rebuild a launcher that kept destroying itself, while the president's special forces watched. The aircraft flew. Keller was just as surprised as everyone else. Nine months of all-nighters after that Rwanda launch, they got one hospital working reliably. Then 20 more in three months. Then 50. Then 400. Today Zipline serves 5,000 hospitals globally and has flown 135 million autonomous miles. To find the best hardware builders in the world, Zipline often hires teenagers. Not as interns fetching coffee — as engineers who own real work. One kid joined at 15 and got offered $180K to lead a team of mechanical engineers instead of going to Stanford. He took it. Another applicant had built a full GPS system for a 3D-printed quadcopter using onboard Nvidia GPUs. While at boarding school. Keller's question for candidates: what have you built? Keller summarized everything in one line: "We specialize in turning the impossible into the merely late." He shares Zipline’s wild origin story in full in our conversation on In Depth. Timestamps: 02:11 Why Zipline doesn't hire for experience 06:04 Are founders born or made? 07:37 Why Zipline hires 17-year-olds over PhDs 17:03 The employees Zipline doesn't want 18:53 The ultimate startup hire is a "heat-seeking missile" 20:36 Why blind references are a non-negotiable 23:07 Can candidates admit when they screwed up? 30:10 Zipline's secret leadership playbook 35:16 Why you should always fire quickly 36:26 The early vision for Zipline 39:48 How Zipline almost died - twice 44:55 From toy robots to drone delivery: Zipline's pivot 51:35 How Rwanda's health minister changed everything 57:10 Why Zipline's launch was a "complete disaster" 1:04:05 Scaling from 1 hospital to 5000 1:05:17 The 10x hardware cost rule every founder should know

Brett Berson

42,859 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The situation in northern Israel is getting surprisingly little attention in the West. Here’s some background and an explanation of just how dire it is. World War Three gets closer by the day, and I’m not exaggerating. UNSC resolution 1701 (2006) is that Hezbollah agree to stay north of the river Litani in Lebanon. This puts Israeli settlements out of anti-tank rocket range. However, Hezbollah have broken this and since 7th October have fired thousands of rockets into Israel, displacing some 60,000 Israelis from their homes. To be clear, Hezbollah is a direct Iranian proxy, who live like a virus inside the almost-dead body of the Lebanese state. Their fighters are far superior to Hamas, having gained serious experience in the Syrian civil war. They have no real ground manoeuvre or air power, but their tunnels in the chalk rock of southern Lebanon are better than Hamas’ and they have an estimated 150,000 rockets. There are UN Peacekeepers in Lebanon, but (shockingly for the UN, I know) they’re as much use as a bacon sandwich at a Bar Mitzvah. One very senior Israeli source described them to me as “an umbrella that folds when it rains”. So Israel has a real, very serious problem. They do not have the manpower to assault into Lebanon for any kind of sustained campaign, especially whilst Gaza is ongoing. So, in polite terms, they are kicking the shit out of it from the air (over which they have total superiority) and relying on missile defences. Thousands of targets have been struck in the last 9 months but Hezbollah retain very significant missile capability. This is why Israel are beholden to the USA to offer obscenely generous ceasefire terms to Hamas (that Hamas appear to be declining). They cannot afford to lose American military aid with this threat on their northern border. In the videos below, in the first vid you see the war zone northern Israel has become. The second one is the settlement of Katzrin in the Golan Heights. Surrounded on all sides by fires. In a statement to Qatari-funded Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece Al Jazeera, yesterday Hezbollah said, “We simultaneously attacked 15 bases in the Golan and the Galilee using 150 rockets and 30 drones. This is the most extensive attack carried out by the organization since October 8, this attack came in response to the assassination in Joya and in order to deter Israel from carrying out further assassinations of this type.” On top of that, Iranian proxies in Iraq took responsibility last night for the joint operation they carried out together with the Houthis (Iranian proxies in Yemen), which launched these ballistic missiles and UAVs towards the Israeli cities of Ashdod and Haifa (third video). Iran is besieging Israel on all sides, and Israel is bending, not breaking. This situation is genuinely dire. It explains why Hamas will not sign a ceasefire deal, and why other non-Iran aligned Gulf states are meeting with IDF commanders. The entire region is teetering on the edge of a much more widespread conflict with Iran, and Israel is taking the brunt of it. If this situation deteriorates, our allies in the Gulf may call for aid. As a second front in the war against the Iran-Russia-China-Qatar axis of malign global actors, this could not be more serious or worrying. And all the while we see subversive Iranian proxy organisations organising protests about Gaza on Western streets. Hopefully the West is not defeated domestically before the war even starts in earnest.
1:00

The situation in northern Israel is getting surprisingly little attention in the West. Here’s some background and an explanation of just how dire it is. World War Three gets closer by the day, and I’m not exaggerating. UNSC resolution 1701 (2006) is that Hezbollah agree to stay north of the river Litani in Lebanon. This puts Israeli settlements out of anti-tank rocket range. However, Hezbollah have broken this and since 7th October have fired thousands of rockets into Israel, displacing some 60,000 Israelis from their homes. To be clear, Hezbollah is a direct Iranian proxy, who live like a virus inside the almost-dead body of the Lebanese state. Their fighters are far superior to Hamas, having gained serious experience in the Syrian civil war. They have no real ground manoeuvre or air power, but their tunnels in the chalk rock of southern Lebanon are better than Hamas’ and they have an estimated 150,000 rockets. There are UN Peacekeepers in Lebanon, but (shockingly for the UN, I know) they’re as much use as a bacon sandwich at a Bar Mitzvah. One very senior Israeli source described them to me as “an umbrella that folds when it rains”. So Israel has a real, very serious problem. They do not have the manpower to assault into Lebanon for any kind of sustained campaign, especially whilst Gaza is ongoing. So, in polite terms, they are kicking the shit out of it from the air (over which they have total superiority) and relying on missile defences. Thousands of targets have been struck in the last 9 months but Hezbollah retain very significant missile capability. This is why Israel are beholden to the USA to offer obscenely generous ceasefire terms to Hamas (that Hamas appear to be declining). They cannot afford to lose American military aid with this threat on their northern border. In the videos below, in the first vid you see the war zone northern Israel has become. The second one is the settlement of Katzrin in the Golan Heights. Surrounded on all sides by fires. In a statement to Qatari-funded Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece Al Jazeera, yesterday Hezbollah said, “We simultaneously attacked 15 bases in the Golan and the Galilee using 150 rockets and 30 drones. This is the most extensive attack carried out by the organization since October 8, this attack came in response to the assassination in Joya and in order to deter Israel from carrying out further assassinations of this type.” On top of that, Iranian proxies in Iraq took responsibility last night for the joint operation they carried out together with the Houthis (Iranian proxies in Yemen), which launched these ballistic missiles and UAVs towards the Israeli cities of Ashdod and Haifa (third video). Iran is besieging Israel on all sides, and Israel is bending, not breaking. This situation is genuinely dire. It explains why Hamas will not sign a ceasefire deal, and why other non-Iran aligned Gulf states are meeting with IDF commanders. The entire region is teetering on the edge of a much more widespread conflict with Iran, and Israel is taking the brunt of it. If this situation deteriorates, our allies in the Gulf may call for aid. As a second front in the war against the Iran-Russia-China-Qatar axis of malign global actors, this could not be more serious or worrying. And all the while we see subversive Iranian proxy organisations organising protests about Gaza on Western streets. Hopefully the West is not defeated domestically before the war even starts in earnest.

Andrew Fox

1,310,115 просмотров • 2 лет назад

//The Wire//1900Z July 14, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: WAR IN MIDDLE EAST REMAINS HOT WITH USA AND IRAN EXCHANGING HEAVY FIRE OVERNIGHT. NEW YORK TIMES JOURNALISTS ISSUED SUBPOENAS REGARDING THEIR REPORTING ON AIR FORCE ONE.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Middle East: The war continued to escalate overnight, with the attack/counterattack cycle no longer being distinguishable, as all belligerents are now attacking constantly. At least two more ships have been struck in the Strait of Hormuz since last night, and the US has continued to fly continuous sorties to strike targets within Iran. Dozens of targets were struck overnight, with CENTCOM announcing that the sorties took 5 hours to complete throughout the region. As of this morning, nearly all of the targets that have been struck have been within a few hundred yards of the Gulf, with heavy concentrations of targets being located within Bushehr, Bandar Abbas, Chabahar, and Jask, all of which are major naval bases. Most of the Gulf islands have also been struck, with Qeshm and Kish Islands being targeted heavily this afternoon. Conversely, Iran has conducted their own strikes in Jordan, Bahrain, Qatar, and Kuwait. In Kuwait, Iranian forces have conducted counter-battery fire on American HIMARS missile launcher sites, with multiple ballistic missile strikes taking place at most of the US bases and missile launch sites all day. Analyst Comment: Over the past 24 hours, the war in the Middle East has returned to the level of fighting first observed during the height of the war back in March. How long this is planned to continue is unknown, but this is not a slight increase in targeting; the war appears to be fully back on once again. United Kingdom: This morning Counterterrorism police released more details regarding a high-profile murder case that took place last week. On Thursday, Ann Widdecombe was found murdered in her home in the town of Haytor in Devon. After her murder was discovered, local authorities immediately referred the case to counterterrorism, and one suspect has already been arrested in conjunction with this case. This suspect has been charged for the murder, and as of this morning terrorism offenses have been added to the list of charges. Analyst Comment: This case is noteworthy as most of the information so far indicates this was a political assassination, and the speed at which authorities have immediately declared this to be a terrorism incident is very, very unusual. Widdecombe was a former Member of Parliament, and in her later years was a familiar conservative political commentator known to weigh in on political issues throughout the nation. More details may or may not come to light in due time regarding the identity of the suspect, but due to the high-profile nature of this murder, this case will be in the headlines for a while. -HomeFront- Washington D.C. - Yesterday a total of five New York Times reporters have been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury, to testify regarding their reporting on the alleged security breaches onboard the new Air Force One. Last week, President Trump flew to Turkey for the NATO summit on the new airframe, but during the trip, an undisclosed security issue prompted the Secret Service to switch back to the older platform. Analyst Comment: The details of exactly what the alleged crimes are, have not been disclosed. The New York Times has a history of publishing content which could lead to security issues, but in this case nothing they wrote in their original report appears to have been classified. However, they did explicitly state that they had a source who had classified knowledge of the defenses (or rather, the alleged lack of defenses) on the new Air Force One platform, which is probably why the harsh crackdown on the New York Times. They also made the claim that the new airframe has not had enough time to install the anti-missile countermeasures of the older platform, though no detail on this was provided. Regardless, talking to journalists in any capacity about any of the protection measures used by the White House is a huge no-no, and one of the most sensitive issues that always results in a very heavy-handed response. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: As the war in the Persian Gulf rages on, concerns are growing regarding the apparent widening of the war to include the Red Sea region. The mutual targeting between the Saudis and the Houthis in Yemen has continued to some degree, though it's too soon to tell if either party is committed to turning this into a more protracted fight. If that is the chosen course of action, the situation is likely to get very serious. While the Strait of Hormuz remains a hot warzone that has restricted the flow of about 20 million barrels per day out of the region, the Saudi East-West Pipeline system has been working to reduce this deficit by pumping roughly 7 million barrels per day during most of this conflict. This has eased the burden of Hormuz being cut off, and has been one of the main factors keeping oil from reaching $200 per barrel. However, this pipeline runs from the Gulf, across the desert, before terminating in Yanbu at a major oil export terminal. This terminal....is within missile range of the Houthis. Somewhat interestingly, there are also very little air defenses in the southern regions of Saudi Arabia despite the Saudis fighting the Houthis for a couple of decades at this point; nearly all missile defenses are on the northern coastline or in the vicinity of American bases. So far during this conflict, the Iranians have successfully struck the Yanbu oil terminal using extremely long-range (and slow-flying) drones. The Houthis have a much higher chance of success in threatening Yanbu, and if they are able to strike this facility, the global oil crisis will go from worse to worst. Analyst: S2A1 Research: NomadNet: 5fa68c88be727a0e1a250a75e5e79269 Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//
4:58

//The Wire//1900Z July 14, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: WAR IN MIDDLE EAST REMAINS HOT WITH USA AND IRAN EXCHANGING HEAVY FIRE OVERNIGHT. NEW YORK TIMES JOURNALISTS ISSUED SUBPOENAS REGARDING THEIR REPORTING ON AIR FORCE ONE.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Middle East: The war continued to escalate overnight, with the attack/counterattack cycle no longer being distinguishable, as all belligerents are now attacking constantly. At least two more ships have been struck in the Strait of Hormuz since last night, and the US has continued to fly continuous sorties to strike targets within Iran. Dozens of targets were struck overnight, with CENTCOM announcing that the sorties took 5 hours to complete throughout the region. As of this morning, nearly all of the targets that have been struck have been within a few hundred yards of the Gulf, with heavy concentrations of targets being located within Bushehr, Bandar Abbas, Chabahar, and Jask, all of which are major naval bases. Most of the Gulf islands have also been struck, with Qeshm and Kish Islands being targeted heavily this afternoon. Conversely, Iran has conducted their own strikes in Jordan, Bahrain, Qatar, and Kuwait. In Kuwait, Iranian forces have conducted counter-battery fire on American HIMARS missile launcher sites, with multiple ballistic missile strikes taking place at most of the US bases and missile launch sites all day. Analyst Comment: Over the past 24 hours, the war in the Middle East has returned to the level of fighting first observed during the height of the war back in March. How long this is planned to continue is unknown, but this is not a slight increase in targeting; the war appears to be fully back on once again. United Kingdom: This morning Counterterrorism police released more details regarding a high-profile murder case that took place last week. On Thursday, Ann Widdecombe was found murdered in her home in the town of Haytor in Devon. After her murder was discovered, local authorities immediately referred the case to counterterrorism, and one suspect has already been arrested in conjunction with this case. This suspect has been charged for the murder, and as of this morning terrorism offenses have been added to the list of charges. Analyst Comment: This case is noteworthy as most of the information so far indicates this was a political assassination, and the speed at which authorities have immediately declared this to be a terrorism incident is very, very unusual. Widdecombe was a former Member of Parliament, and in her later years was a familiar conservative political commentator known to weigh in on political issues throughout the nation. More details may or may not come to light in due time regarding the identity of the suspect, but due to the high-profile nature of this murder, this case will be in the headlines for a while. -HomeFront- Washington D.C. - Yesterday a total of five New York Times reporters have been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury, to testify regarding their reporting on the alleged security breaches onboard the new Air Force One. Last week, President Trump flew to Turkey for the NATO summit on the new airframe, but during the trip, an undisclosed security issue prompted the Secret Service to switch back to the older platform. Analyst Comment: The details of exactly what the alleged crimes are, have not been disclosed. The New York Times has a history of publishing content which could lead to security issues, but in this case nothing they wrote in their original report appears to have been classified. However, they did explicitly state that they had a source who had classified knowledge of the defenses (or rather, the alleged lack of defenses) on the new Air Force One platform, which is probably why the harsh crackdown on the New York Times. They also made the claim that the new airframe has not had enough time to install the anti-missile countermeasures of the older platform, though no detail on this was provided. Regardless, talking to journalists in any capacity about any of the protection measures used by the White House is a huge no-no, and one of the most sensitive issues that always results in a very heavy-handed response. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: As the war in the Persian Gulf rages on, concerns are growing regarding the apparent widening of the war to include the Red Sea region. The mutual targeting between the Saudis and the Houthis in Yemen has continued to some degree, though it's too soon to tell if either party is committed to turning this into a more protracted fight. If that is the chosen course of action, the situation is likely to get very serious. While the Strait of Hormuz remains a hot warzone that has restricted the flow of about 20 million barrels per day out of the region, the Saudi East-West Pipeline system has been working to reduce this deficit by pumping roughly 7 million barrels per day during most of this conflict. This has eased the burden of Hormuz being cut off, and has been one of the main factors keeping oil from reaching $200 per barrel. However, this pipeline runs from the Gulf, across the desert, before terminating in Yanbu at a major oil export terminal. This terminal....is within missile range of the Houthis. Somewhat interestingly, there are also very little air defenses in the southern regions of Saudi Arabia despite the Saudis fighting the Houthis for a couple of decades at this point; nearly all missile defenses are on the northern coastline or in the vicinity of American bases. So far during this conflict, the Iranians have successfully struck the Yanbu oil terminal using extremely long-range (and slow-flying) drones. The Houthis have a much higher chance of success in threatening Yanbu, and if they are able to strike this facility, the global oil crisis will go from worse to worst. Analyst: S2A1 Research: NomadNet: 5fa68c88be727a0e1a250a75e5e79269 Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

17,672 просмотров • 3 дней назад