Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Here are both clips in slow motion. #GoSensGo The problem with this is that people can't differentiate between severity and intent. Larkin got the worst of it, and hopefully he's alright. But Perron actively attempted to injure a player. Retaliation is not a valid excuse.

2,288,946 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Everyday Sens
Everyday Sensvor 2 Jahren

It looked like Joseph cross-checked Larkin's head from the other angle. But in reality, he hardly made contact with an open hand. I don't know how you can compare these plays. One is a terrible accident and one is purposeful.

Profilbild von dylan pendergast
dylan pendergastvor 2 Jahren

you cannot defend joseph here at all

Profilbild von Kasermap
Kasermapvor 2 Jahren

As a wings fan I agree. But Joseph has a history with Larkin that shouldn’t be ignored.

Profilbild von Bruce Betts
Bruce Bettsvor 2 Jahren

I don’t have a dog in the fight but genuinely confused why people keep talking about Joseph. Clearly Kelly (accidentally) caused the Larkin injury.

Profilbild von Nightmare on Helm Street
Nightmare on Helm Streetvor 2 Jahren

Both players were wrong. Joseph wasn’t just making a hockey play Perron should’ve stood up for Larkin a different way. Neither excuses each other

Profilbild von Mark Kulaszewski
Mark Kulaszewskivor 2 Jahren

Zub is back in the game. But Larkin isnt. Care to explain ur logic there?

Profilbild von Nick Rou
Nick Rouvor 2 Jahren

@BizNasty2point0 It is clear as day. Clip A) is a battle in front of the net that happens 20 times a game. And hopefully Larkin is OK. Clip B) is a straight cross check to the temple. The league will confirm this when they announce that Perron is the only player who will have a hearing.

Profilbild von 3rd Rate Weird Al
3rd Rate Weird Alvor 2 Jahren

What Perron did is inarguably worse and was called as such Joseph didn’t intend to injure Larkin that seriously, but that’s exactly why there’s no excuse for a headshot like that Both can be true

Profilbild von Shawn Simpson
Shawn Simpsonvor 2 Jahren

@BizNasty2point0 Great points.

Profilbild von Randy‼️
Randy‼️vor 2 Jahren

Sens dirty af

Ähnliche Videos

Steve Jobs: The difference between good people and great people is 50-to-1 “I’ve always considered part of my job was to keep the quality level of people in the organizations I work with very high. I mean that’s what I consider one of the few things I can contribute individually myself — versus the team that work with — is to really try to instill in the organization the goal of having only A players.” Steve argues this is especially important in technology where there’s a huge range between the best person and the worst person: “In a lot of fields, the difference between, say, the worst taxicab driver and the best taxicab driver to get you across town in Manhattan might be 2-to-1. The best one will get you there in 15 minutes, the worst one will get you there in half an hour… Or the best cook and the worst cook, maybe it’s 3-to-1… But in the field that I’m in. In software in particular. The difference between the best person and the worst person is about 100-to-1 or more.” He continues: “The difference between a good software person and a great software person is probably 50-to-1 or 25-to-1. Huge dynamic range. And therefore, I have found — and not just in software but in almost everything I’ve done — it really pays to go after the best people in the world.” But as Steve points out, this isn’t always easy: “It’s very painful when you have some people that are not the best people in the world, and you have to get rid of them. But I’ve found that my job has sometimes been exactly that, to get rid of some of the people that didn’t measure up. And I’ve always tried to do it in a humane way, but nonetheless it has to be done and it’s not ever fun.”

Startup Archive

45,143 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten