Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Here are some cases and articles that I discovered regarding #ASD #SEN #SEND #Autism #AutismAcceptance #AutismAwareness #Autistic Involved #localauthority #socialworkers and Cafcass Speaks about #reasonableadjustments. Again I'll reiterate that there is no #legalguidance for autistic children or autistic adults in family law. They have a bench book but obviously... the recent case ignored that. (2023). There is absolutely no requirement that the person doing assessments is trained and experienced on ASD and that the person who's the voice of the child and making recommendations is trained or experienced either. There is no requirement for a #judge Judicial Office To have any knowledge or experience on autism either on one of these cases. So essentially it's like going to hospital with a broken leg and seeing a mental health professional. Welsh Government Welsh Conservatives 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 GOV.UK Ministry of Justice Alex Chalk KC It shows since 2020 we have now gone backwards. #FamilyCourt #FamilyLaw #Equality #HumanRights #HumanRightsMatter Be #prepared First raised by desrosiers in 2015 in Family Law News #familylawweek it was an interesting article and in 8 years no progress has been made. @SobukiRa The Domestic Abuse Solicitor ⚖️ SHERA Research Group: Health Law Rights Support © Hold Up Your Hands Emma - Fighting 4 Justice 💜 Dr Emma Katz WeAreLegion ❤️ ♤ 🌈☮️ 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @ADarkWorldPod @ResoluteWomens Resolutionshow more

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality

3,786 subscribers

45,076 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics Education #ASD #SEN #SEND #Autism #AutismAcceptance #AutismAwareness #Autistic #localauthority #socialworkers #reasonableadjustments #legalguidance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

#ameliahill #scotthalliday

victoria2 years ago

@MyCafcass I almost can’t listen to you because I am so upset. It’s not rocket science to educate professionals about autism, ADHD etc.

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

@RowanzzHull @MyCafcass Oh I'm sorry I haven't genuinely meant to cause upset. I just know how this is and had to deal with it myself with my sons rights stripped away due to his additional needs

Author Profile, Loren Keeling2 years ago

@MyCafcass You are doing brilliant work in talking about these cases, especially where individuals have been discriminated against in the court system. 👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

@MyCafcass I think mant don't realise these exist. It isn't given exposure how they are behaving the LAs or the courts and cafcass. These are patterns in cases when the parent or child is autistic. It just seems to be going backwards

Andie Marie S.T.O.P forced adoption2 years ago

@MyCafcass My daughter is ADHD/AsD and myself. Instead of supporting us they removed her and she went through hell in the system. Almost gone 💔. Now I fight for the rights of children in care especially SEN mums and children. Is there any way I can contact you please 🙏

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

@MyCafcass I'm so sorry I know the feeling too well which is why I campaign myself. I follow you so you can message me xx

Hold Up Your Hands2 years ago

@MyCafcass This is sheer madness @AlexChalkChelt @MoJGovUK @CommonsSpeaker @HouseofCommons 🤮🚩💔

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

@MyCafcass @AlexChalkChelt @MoJGovUK @CommonsSpeaker @HouseofCommons It really is isn't it. Oh god forbid though I may be called Dr Google again for educating myself and researching

FCReform12 years ago

@MyCafcass HHJ Middleton Roy does not shy away from making difficult decisions which shows other judges and Cafcass to have erred in law. I hope one day there will be many more like him.

Fighting for Justice for DA victims and Equality2 years ago

@MyCafcass Well I admit I was impressed with his judgement. Its a shame that so many others in the High court are family court are failing

Related Videos

We used to have Christians willing to be eaten by Lions. Now we have “Latter-day Bridge Builders” building bridges to where exactly? These people know nothing about Christianity let alone the restored gospel. Being “active” is not the goal. Being a born again is the goal. ———- Doctrine and Covenants 88 34 And again, verily I say unto you, that which is governed by law is also preserved by law and perfected and sanctified by the same. 35 That which breaketh a law, and abideth not by law, but seeketh to become a law unto itself, and willeth to abide in sin, and altogether abideth in sin, cannot be sanctified by law, neither by mercy, justice, nor judgment. Therefore, they must remain filthy still. 36 All kingdoms have a law given; 37 And there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom. 38 And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions. 39 All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified…. And they who are not sanctified through the law which I have given unto you, even the law of Christ, must inherit another kingdom, even that of a terrestrial kingdom, or that of a telestial kingdom. For he who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory.

Sensitive content

We used to have Christians willing to be eaten by Lions. Now we have “Latter-day Bridge Builders” building bridges to where exactly? These people know nothing about Christianity let alone the restored gospel. Being “active” is not the goal. Being a born again is the goal. ———- Doctrine and Covenants 88 34 And again, verily I say unto you, that which is governed by law is also preserved by law and perfected and sanctified by the same. 35 That which breaketh a law, and abideth not by law, but seeketh to become a law unto itself, and willeth to abide in sin, and altogether abideth in sin, cannot be sanctified by law, neither by mercy, justice, nor judgment. Therefore, they must remain filthy still. 36 All kingdoms have a law given; 37 And there are many kingdoms; for there is no space in the which there is no kingdom; and there is no kingdom in which there is no space, either a greater or a lesser kingdom. 38 And unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions. 39 All beings who abide not in those conditions are not justified…. And they who are not sanctified through the law which I have given unto you, even the law of Christ, must inherit another kingdom, even that of a terrestrial kingdom, or that of a telestial kingdom. For he who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide a celestial glory.

Thoughtful-Faith

59,587 views • 5 days ago

Gaza: The West can no longer preach to us about its HYPOCRITICAL values of ‘freedom’, ‘equality’, and ‘human rights’ ‘There are a lot of values that have been promoted in the West that have been proven hypocritical, to be honest. We live in the West. We thought that liberty and equality and the rule of international law is prevalent and that these countries are based on democracy and people have the absolute power. But then when the genocide came, all these values have been exposed. I no longer believe in any of these values. I believe in the principle with these values. But I don’t believe that the Western countries can ever preach to us about human rights or international law or democracy or freedom or equality. I don’t understand what that means anymore in the West, but also at the same time in the UK. The people in the UK have proven to be a people who care for justice, for freedom, for dignity. We have seen a huge massive protest that went out in support of Palestine and in support of the Palestinian people. But unfortunately their government has never represented them in the way that they deserve.’ -Ahmed Alnaouq, Co-Founder of We Are Not Numbers, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Gaza: The West can no longer preach to us about its HYPOCRITICAL values of ‘freedom’, ‘equality’, and ‘human rights’ ‘There are a lot of values that have been promoted in the West that have been proven hypocritical, to be honest. We live in the West. We thought that liberty and equality and the rule of international law is prevalent and that these countries are based on democracy and people have the absolute power. But then when the genocide came, all these values have been exposed. I no longer believe in any of these values. I believe in the principle with these values. But I don’t believe that the Western countries can ever preach to us about human rights or international law or democracy or freedom or equality. I don’t understand what that means anymore in the West, but also at the same time in the UK. The people in the UK have proven to be a people who care for justice, for freedom, for dignity. We have seen a huge massive protest that went out in support of Palestine and in support of the Palestinian people. But unfortunately their government has never represented them in the way that they deserve.’ -Ahmed Alnaouq, Co-Founder of We Are Not Numbers, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

57,345 views • 8 months ago

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith

Smith "I would say that it is a single judge who's made a decision and we have now 700,000 Albertans, whether they're on the remain side or the leave side, who've said that they want to have this public debate." "...I'll listen to my caucus and I'll listen to my cabinet because we are the duly elected representatives of the people of Alberta and this is a decision by one judge at a lower court level and it's appealable. And so because we think they have been incorrect in law, we will be appealing it." "we think that there may have been an error in law made here because the duty to consult has been interpreted normally when you're talking about a specific project like a pipeline project, which is what we're doing right now in consulting on a west coast pipeline route" "...This is not clear and so that's why we think it may be incorrect in law and why we will be appealing it. " "The proponent of that petition always intended for it to go to a referendum... so that is what the committee is grappling with right now since he seemed to have flip flopped and changed his mind after the fact." Danielle Smith

cbcwatcher

57,003 views • 3 months ago

We’re confronted with a jarring reality. A Judge’s residence in Lutyen's Delhi had burnt notes and cash. There is no FIR till date. We have in the country rule of law, criminal justice system. There can be no occasion whatsoever to delay even for a moment because that is ordainment of law. The rule of law is the very foundation of society. #Democracy has to be defined primarily by three aspects: expression, dialogue and accountability. Therefore, if we have to really nurture democracy, it is inescapable that we hold every institution and every individual accountable and in accordance with law. The surest way to degenerate an individual or bring down an institution is to keep it away from probe and scrutiny, which means that the individual becomes law unto oneself. #Constitution

We’re confronted with a jarring reality. A Judge’s residence in Lutyen's Delhi had burnt notes and cash. There is no FIR till date. We have in the country rule of law, criminal justice system. There can be no occasion whatsoever to delay even for a moment because that is ordainment of law. The rule of law is the very foundation of society. #Democracy has to be defined primarily by three aspects: expression, dialogue and accountability. Therefore, if we have to really nurture democracy, it is inescapable that we hold every institution and every individual accountable and in accordance with law. The surest way to degenerate an individual or bring down an institution is to keep it away from probe and scrutiny, which means that the individual becomes law unto oneself. #Constitution

Vice-President of India

104,055 views • 1 year ago

A turning point — dozens of new autism studies are now underway. Consider that the CDC and “health” authorities have conducted a decades-long media campaign seeking to assure parents that vaccines do not cause autism. Parents of autistic children have also been gaslit, attacked, and berated by the media, public “health” authorities, the medical establishment, almost everyone. Yet these parents stubbornly refuse to change their conclusion regarding what caused their child’s autism. In fact, numerous peer-reviewed studies have found that, when surveyed, between 40% and 70% of autism parents squarely blame vaccines for their child’s autism. The reason, in my experience, is that parents of children with autism cannot unlive what they have experienced with their children. Hence, no number of metaphorical beatings can change their reality. They know their children, and their lived experience will not change no matter what you do or say to them. Del Bigtree The HighWire

A turning point — dozens of new autism studies are now underway. Consider that the CDC and “health” authorities have conducted a decades-long media campaign seeking to assure parents that vaccines do not cause autism. Parents of autistic children have also been gaslit, attacked, and berated by the media, public “health” authorities, the medical establishment, almost everyone. Yet these parents stubbornly refuse to change their conclusion regarding what caused their child’s autism. In fact, numerous peer-reviewed studies have found that, when surveyed, between 40% and 70% of autism parents squarely blame vaccines for their child’s autism. The reason, in my experience, is that parents of children with autism cannot unlive what they have experienced with their children. Hence, no number of metaphorical beatings can change their reality. They know their children, and their lived experience will not change no matter what you do or say to them. Del Bigtree The HighWire

Aaron Siri

11,556 views • 6 months ago

Autistic NewsNation host finds nothing funny about late-night hosts mocking Trump’s search for autism answers as “f*cking crazy.” “It’s hilarious, isn’t it?” Leland Vittert said, showing no amusement on his face. “To them, the discussion on autism was just fodder for laughs, which is PATENTLY OFFENSIVE. And interesting coming from the left that purports themselves to be oh, so tolerant. How many press conferences did Biden hold on autism? We went back and looked. Ready? Zero.” “Did any presidents previously get in front of the country and say there is a scientific question of our time that needs to be answered about why the exploding number of autism cases is happening? No.”

Autistic NewsNation host finds nothing funny about late-night hosts mocking Trump’s search for autism answers as “f*cking crazy.” “It’s hilarious, isn’t it?” Leland Vittert said, showing no amusement on his face. “To them, the discussion on autism was just fodder for laughs, which is PATENTLY OFFENSIVE. And interesting coming from the left that purports themselves to be oh, so tolerant. How many press conferences did Biden hold on autism? We went back and looked. Ready? Zero.” “Did any presidents previously get in front of the country and say there is a scientific question of our time that needs to be answered about why the exploding number of autism cases is happening? No.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

600,396 views • 11 months ago

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,969 views • 2 years ago

We had a detailed representation before the Election Commission. We told them, and we demonstrated according to us, beyond doubt and beyond any matter of controversy, that the RO has passed a perverse order. The Election Commission's own law, the Representation of the People Act, has Section 33A, which says that disclosure is required only in those cases where the punishment is more than two years, and above all, only in those cases where charges have been framed. The process of framing charges is a judicial process. A judge frames charges. Now, as any kindergarten or first-year law student knows, the first step is a private complaint. That private complaint may be baseless and may have no legs to stand on. The second stage is the taking of cognizance by the magistrate, which is a judicial and independent process. Ms. Natarajan only received a notice to appear before the court and explain why cognizance should not be taken. That means the notice she received was before any cognizance was taken. Without cognizance, no criminal case exists in the eyes of the law. There is no criminal case merely because I allege something against somebody else without cognizance being taken. They have rejected Ms. Natarajan's nomination despite the non-existence of even cognizance, which means there was no criminal case that she could have disclosed. Whereas Section 33A, says that after cognizance is taken, there will be an investigation. After the investigation, there will be a charge sheet. The RO's order uses the word "sangyan." Sangyan means cognizance. There was no cognizance taken. Ultimately, we also pointed out to the Election Commission that it has a huge reservoir of power under Article 324. It is a constitutional power, an untrammable power and an inherent power. It is the power to do justice and the power to right wrongs. We hope and trust that the Election Commission will realize that this creates a very bad, distorted, non-level playing field. A non-level playing field strikes at the heart of democracy. A violation of that strikes further at the heart of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, we have requested them for an immediate decision. We have come on the day of withdrawal. There is sufficient time. This is a completely egregious, blatant, patently unlawful order, without any basis in law, and it should be set aside immediately. That is our request. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.

We had a detailed representation before the Election Commission. We told them, and we demonstrated according to us, beyond doubt and beyond any matter of controversy, that the RO has passed a perverse order. The Election Commission's own law, the Representation of the People Act, has Section 33A, which says that disclosure is required only in those cases where the punishment is more than two years, and above all, only in those cases where charges have been framed. The process of framing charges is a judicial process. A judge frames charges. Now, as any kindergarten or first-year law student knows, the first step is a private complaint. That private complaint may be baseless and may have no legs to stand on. The second stage is the taking of cognizance by the magistrate, which is a judicial and independent process. Ms. Natarajan only received a notice to appear before the court and explain why cognizance should not be taken. That means the notice she received was before any cognizance was taken. Without cognizance, no criminal case exists in the eyes of the law. There is no criminal case merely because I allege something against somebody else without cognizance being taken. They have rejected Ms. Natarajan's nomination despite the non-existence of even cognizance, which means there was no criminal case that she could have disclosed. Whereas Section 33A, says that after cognizance is taken, there will be an investigation. After the investigation, there will be a charge sheet. The RO's order uses the word "sangyan." Sangyan means cognizance. There was no cognizance taken. Ultimately, we also pointed out to the Election Commission that it has a huge reservoir of power under Article 324. It is a constitutional power, an untrammable power and an inherent power. It is the power to do justice and the power to right wrongs. We hope and trust that the Election Commission will realize that this creates a very bad, distorted, non-level playing field. A non-level playing field strikes at the heart of democracy. A violation of that strikes further at the heart of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, we have requested them for an immediate decision. We have come on the day of withdrawal. There is sufficient time. This is a completely egregious, blatant, patently unlawful order, without any basis in law, and it should be set aside immediately. That is our request. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.

Congress

42,100 views • 2 months ago

The presidential pardon system is broken. Right now, there are no meaningful checks on the President’s pardon power. That makes it ripe for abuse, and it’s a threat to the rule of law. That’s why I support a constitutional amendment to put commonsense limits in place: no self-pardons, no pardons for family, administration officials, or campaign staff, and no pardons for anyone whose crimes were committed to benefit the President or those closest to them — or carried out at a President’s direction. It is time to protect the Constitution and the rule of law with common sense limits that restore public trust.

The presidential pardon system is broken. Right now, there are no meaningful checks on the President’s pardon power. That makes it ripe for abuse, and it’s a threat to the rule of law. That’s why I support a constitutional amendment to put commonsense limits in place: no self-pardons, no pardons for family, administration officials, or campaign staff, and no pardons for anyone whose crimes were committed to benefit the President or those closest to them — or carried out at a President’s direction. It is time to protect the Constitution and the rule of law with common sense limits that restore public trust.

Rep. Mike Levin

212,601 views • 7 months ago

Asked Senate Majority Leader John Thune about Sen. Moreno’s call for Max Miller to resign, and he said: “It’s a very sad and unfortunate case. It is a family matter. I don't have any observations beyond that.” Asked later about lawmakers facing domestic abuse and if they should serve in Congress, Thune said: “Those decisions on the future there are going to be made ultimately by the people of Ohio, and I think that's true — and I would say that, I would say that of any similar case. It ultimately comes down to whoever that person is and the voters that they represent and then, obviously, the institution in which they serve,” citing ethics probes.

Asked Senate Majority Leader John Thune about Sen. Moreno’s call for Max Miller to resign, and he said: “It’s a very sad and unfortunate case. It is a family matter. I don't have any observations beyond that.” Asked later about lawmakers facing domestic abuse and if they should serve in Congress, Thune said: “Those decisions on the future there are going to be made ultimately by the people of Ohio, and I think that's true — and I would say that, I would say that of any similar case. It ultimately comes down to whoever that person is and the voters that they represent and then, obviously, the institution in which they serve,” citing ethics probes.

Manu Raju

35,219 views • 18 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta says, "There are certain rules of interpretation which are followed today. There is rule of some provisions being inclusive and some provisions being exhaustive. Exhaustive means ABCD it doesn't permit you to have E. Indian jurisprudence in law is the only jurisprudence which years back, centuries back permitted this to happen. For example, when American Constitution was made, it provided for a system that the Congress will have to establish army and navy... So an interpretative process was undertaken that army and navy would naturally mean all defence forces which are available at a given point of time. Now that interpretative rule is available in our Indian parlance, in our Indian law, in our Shastric law since time immemorial. For example, if I have a son through my legally wedded wife, it is called auras putra- legitimate child. If I have a child which is either adopted or not through my legally wedded wife, it would be anauras putra. Now some dogmatic doctrines used to be that anaurasputra has neither any rights nor any liabilities. But India is the only country where the rule of liberal interpretation was introduced and said that for the purpose of discharging responsibilities and claiming rights, anauras putra is also to be treated or deemed to be auras putra. Nowhere in the world, this position is emerging..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta says, "There are certain rules of interpretation which are followed today. There is rule of some provisions being inclusive and some provisions being exhaustive. Exhaustive means ABCD it doesn't permit you to have E. Indian jurisprudence in law is the only jurisprudence which years back, centuries back permitted this to happen. For example, when American Constitution was made, it provided for a system that the Congress will have to establish army and navy... So an interpretative process was undertaken that army and navy would naturally mean all defence forces which are available at a given point of time. Now that interpretative rule is available in our Indian parlance, in our Indian law, in our Shastric law since time immemorial. For example, if I have a son through my legally wedded wife, it is called auras putra- legitimate child. If I have a child which is either adopted or not through my legally wedded wife, it would be anauras putra. Now some dogmatic doctrines used to be that anaurasputra has neither any rights nor any liabilities. But India is the only country where the rule of liberal interpretation was introduced and said that for the purpose of discharging responsibilities and claiming rights, anauras putra is also to be treated or deemed to be auras putra. Nowhere in the world, this position is emerging..."

ANI

61,668 views • 1 month ago