Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Here is a clear and neutral summary of the Instagram controversy between AbdurRehman Cheema and Arsalan Parahi. Cheema's viewpoint is that when Islam arrived in the region (7th-8th century CE when the Arab conquest of Sindh took place,ancestors of modern day Pakistanis were primarily Buddhist,he emphasizes the rich Buddhist...

Pakforever9's profile picture

Shumail 🇵🇰🍁

1,559 subscribers

64,772 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The people of Bali, Indonesia, speak fluently in Sanskrit and proud to be Sanatanis! Hinduism in Bali has a strong connection to Sanskrit as the Indonesia Bahasa (भाषा) is greatly influenced by its Hindu heritage. In fact, Sanskrit was the court language of the Hindu & Buddhist kingdoms of yester-years. Almost all inscriptions found in archaeological excavations were in Sanskrit.
8:12

The people of Bali, Indonesia, speak fluently in Sanskrit and proud to be Sanatanis! Hinduism in Bali has a strong connection to Sanskrit as the Indonesia Bahasa (भाषा) is greatly influenced by its Hindu heritage. In fact, Sanskrit was the court language of the Hindu & Buddhist kingdoms of yester-years. Almost all inscriptions found in archaeological excavations were in Sanskrit.

महावीर, ಮಹಾವೀರ, Mahavir

75,153 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Important video showing the timeline of Rajiv Sinha, who is masquerading as a Hindu and is the director of Pakistan’s ISI-controlled group called “Hindus for Human Rights.” He never posts about the plight of Hindus in Pakistan or Bangladesh or Hindu temples vandalised by Khalistan extremists in Canada or in the US. He follows and shares Audrey Truschke, who distorts Hindu history, and anti-Hindu handles like the “UK Indian Muslim Council” and “Indian American Muslim Council”, funded and operated by Pakistan’s ISI. He vary of such people and organisations.
2:36

Important video showing the timeline of Rajiv Sinha, who is masquerading as a Hindu and is the director of Pakistan’s ISI-controlled group called “Hindus for Human Rights.” He never posts about the plight of Hindus in Pakistan or Bangladesh or Hindu temples vandalised by Khalistan extremists in Canada or in the US. He follows and shares Audrey Truschke, who distorts Hindu history, and anti-Hindu handles like the “UK Indian Muslim Council” and “Indian American Muslim Council”, funded and operated by Pakistan’s ISI. He vary of such people and organisations.

Tathvam-asi

82,561 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Taiwan's Buddhism being the dominant faith that grew from 8% to 35% in the past few decades is just testament of the power of the Triple Gems. The President of Taiwan would attend ceremony at Buddhist temples every year, signifying the primary position of Buddhism in the country. 蒋万安 Chiang Wan-An, Taipei's mayor and the great grandson of famous Christian dictator Chiang Kai Shek was even seen attending Buddhist Master Hsing Yun's funeral holding incense and praying. He is obviously no longer a Christian even though his family was and he even endearingly called Master Hsing Yun, 师父 which means Venerable Father, normally like how a disciple called a Buddhist Master in the video, instead of the normal 法师 which means Dharma Master.
2:13

Taiwan's Buddhism being the dominant faith that grew from 8% to 35% in the past few decades is just testament of the power of the Triple Gems. The President of Taiwan would attend ceremony at Buddhist temples every year, signifying the primary position of Buddhism in the country. 蒋万安 Chiang Wan-An, Taipei's mayor and the great grandson of famous Christian dictator Chiang Kai Shek was even seen attending Buddhist Master Hsing Yun's funeral holding incense and praying. He is obviously no longer a Christian even though his family was and he even endearingly called Master Hsing Yun, 师父 which means Venerable Father, normally like how a disciple called a Buddhist Master in the video, instead of the normal 法师 which means Dharma Master.

JJ Ashoka Wong ☸️🏴

10,468 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mount Kailash གངས་རིན་པོ་ཆེ་ कैलाश पर्वत Mount Kailash is also known as Kang Rinpoche (Tibetan for "precious snow mountain") and Gang Tise locally, and is a sacred mountain in the Gangdise Shan range, revered by Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Bon people. Mount Kailash is a sacred site in Buddhism, and a major destination for Buddhist pilgrimages. It's believed to be the home of the Buddha Demchok, who represents supreme bliss. Hindu it's considered the sacred abode of Lord Shiva, the god of destruction and transformation, and is believed to be the center of the universe, a place of spiritual significance and meditation. Mount Kailash is revered as the "axis mundi" or "cosmic axis," a sacred point where the heavens and earth converge, serving as a link between the physical and metaphysical realms.
8:16

Mount Kailash གངས་རིན་པོ་ཆེ་ कैलाश पर्वत Mount Kailash is also known as Kang Rinpoche (Tibetan for "precious snow mountain") and Gang Tise locally, and is a sacred mountain in the Gangdise Shan range, revered by Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Bon people. Mount Kailash is a sacred site in Buddhism, and a major destination for Buddhist pilgrimages. It's believed to be the home of the Buddha Demchok, who represents supreme bliss. Hindu it's considered the sacred abode of Lord Shiva, the god of destruction and transformation, and is believed to be the center of the universe, a place of spiritual significance and meditation. Mount Kailash is revered as the "axis mundi" or "cosmic axis," a sacred point where the heavens and earth converge, serving as a link between the physical and metaphysical realms.

Louis S. Luzzo, Sr.

25,277 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.
0:48

“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

52,463 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

In the Buddhist PM ruled Nepal... A Hindu religious procession 'Bol-bam' was targeted with heavy stone-pelting by Muslim mobs in Sunsari. Instead of taking action against the perpetrators, the local administration opened fire, killing 24-year-old Om Prakash Mehta and leaving more than 25 people injured. Hindu anger is at an all-time high over this institutional failure.
2:40

In the Buddhist PM ruled Nepal... A Hindu religious procession 'Bol-bam' was targeted with heavy stone-pelting by Muslim mobs in Sunsari. Instead of taking action against the perpetrators, the local administration opened fire, killing 24-year-old Om Prakash Mehta and leaving more than 25 people injured. Hindu anger is at an all-time high over this institutional failure.

Angry Saffron

26,066 просмотров • 21 дней назад

🚨🇮🇱 🇵🇸 The long history of Jews living in peace across the Arab world was only disrupted by the modern emergence of secular nationalist movements. Rabbi Elhanan Beck emphasizes that the current conflict is not a religious war, but a struggle sparked by occupation and the displacement of the Palestinian people. A return to peace is only possible when the occupation ends, allowing Jews and Arabs to coexist as they did for centuries before the rise of Zionism.
10:45

🚨🇮🇱 🇵🇸 The long history of Jews living in peace across the Arab world was only disrupted by the modern emergence of secular nationalist movements. Rabbi Elhanan Beck emphasizes that the current conflict is not a religious war, but a struggle sparked by occupation and the displacement of the Palestinian people. A return to peace is only possible when the occupation ends, allowing Jews and Arabs to coexist as they did for centuries before the rise of Zionism.

Mario Nawfal

43,780 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Why Must Hindus advocate for an Exclusive Hindu Homeland? ➡️ Christianity is the world's largest religion. 240 crore Christians (31% of the world population) have 157 Christian and/or Christian-majority countries that are not anti-Christian. ➡️ Islam is the world's second largest religion. 190 crore Muslims (25% of the world population) have 50 Islamic countries and several countries where they are a dominant minority. ➡️ Buddhism is the world's fourth largest religion. 50 crore Buddhists (6.6% of the world population) have 7 Buddhist countries. ➡️ Judaism is one of the smallest religions in the world. Yet, 1.5 crore Jews, comprising 0.2% of the world population, have one Jewish country. ➡️ Hinduism is the world's third largest religion. Yet, for 116 crore Hindus (15.1% of the world population), there is not one Hindu country in the world, as the only two Hindu-majority countries (India and Nepal) are constitutionally secular countries. ➡️ In other words, one in every seventh person in the world is a Hindu, yet Hindus are literally homeless and orphaned, with no country of their own, due to which they face discrimination, persecution, and genocide almost everywhere globally. No country, including the numerically Hindu-majority India and Nepal, even condemns, let alone takes any action to protect, Hindus. ➡️ A dedicated nation-state is essential for a religion’s survival, cultural preservation, and protection against persecution. ➡️ Hence, to protect and preserve themselves and their religion, Hindus need an Exclusive Hindu Homeland.
0:20

Why Must Hindus advocate for an Exclusive Hindu Homeland? ➡️ Christianity is the world's largest religion. 240 crore Christians (31% of the world population) have 157 Christian and/or Christian-majority countries that are not anti-Christian. ➡️ Islam is the world's second largest religion. 190 crore Muslims (25% of the world population) have 50 Islamic countries and several countries where they are a dominant minority. ➡️ Buddhism is the world's fourth largest religion. 50 crore Buddhists (6.6% of the world population) have 7 Buddhist countries. ➡️ Judaism is one of the smallest religions in the world. Yet, 1.5 crore Jews, comprising 0.2% of the world population, have one Jewish country. ➡️ Hinduism is the world's third largest religion. Yet, for 116 crore Hindus (15.1% of the world population), there is not one Hindu country in the world, as the only two Hindu-majority countries (India and Nepal) are constitutionally secular countries. ➡️ In other words, one in every seventh person in the world is a Hindu, yet Hindus are literally homeless and orphaned, with no country of their own, due to which they face discrimination, persecution, and genocide almost everywhere globally. No country, including the numerically Hindu-majority India and Nepal, even condemns, let alone takes any action to protect, Hindus. ➡️ A dedicated nation-state is essential for a religion’s survival, cultural preservation, and protection against persecution. ➡️ Hence, to protect and preserve themselves and their religion, Hindus need an Exclusive Hindu Homeland.

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

40,388 просмотров • 1 год назад

Apocalypto ends with the Spanish ships appearing on the shore, as if their arrival is about to instantly reshape everything. But in reality, when the Spanish reached Maya regions in the 1500s, the great Maya cities had already declined long before. And the Spanish conquest was not sudden at all. It unfolded slowly, over many decades of resistance, war, disease, and negotiation. The film makes it feel like the Spanish were a dramatic turning point that arrived in one moment, but real history was far more drawn out and complicated. Movie : Apocalypto
0:25

Apocalypto ends with the Spanish ships appearing on the shore, as if their arrival is about to instantly reshape everything. But in reality, when the Spanish reached Maya regions in the 1500s, the great Maya cities had already declined long before. And the Spanish conquest was not sudden at all. It unfolded slowly, over many decades of resistance, war, disease, and negotiation. The film makes it feel like the Spanish were a dramatic turning point that arrived in one moment, but real history was far more drawn out and complicated. Movie : Apocalypto

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

753,865 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The 66-foot Quan Am statue has stood peacefully at the Vietnam Buddhist Center in Sugar Land since 2000. For over two decades, there was no panic about a “foreign takeover” of Texas. Then a 90-foot Hanuman statue was inaugurated in 2024, and suddenly the same X grifters started screaming “Indian invasion,” “Texas is being conquered,” and even calling a Hindu temple “demonic.” The road has long been home to churches, mosques, Buddhist temples, and Hindu temples. No one claimed America was being “taken over” when other faiths built places of worship. The outrage only appeared when the temple was Hindu and the community was Indian. We all know this isn’t organic concern over zoning or aesthetics. It’s a manufactured propaganda campaign that repackages anti-Indian and anti-Hindu bigotry as “patriotism.” The goal is obvious: turn normal religious expression into evidence of an imagined civilizational invasion. America doesn’t become less American because Indian Americans build a temple, just as it didn’t because Vietnamese Americans built a Buddhist statue 24 years earlier. The selective outrage exposes the narrative for what it is: propaganda designed to manufacture fear and resentment where none existed. Religious freedom applies to everyone, not just the communities X grifters approve of. 🇺🇸🕉️ Happy July 4th Weekend to ALL AMERICANS.
2:02

The 66-foot Quan Am statue has stood peacefully at the Vietnam Buddhist Center in Sugar Land since 2000. For over two decades, there was no panic about a “foreign takeover” of Texas. Then a 90-foot Hanuman statue was inaugurated in 2024, and suddenly the same X grifters started screaming “Indian invasion,” “Texas is being conquered,” and even calling a Hindu temple “demonic.” The road has long been home to churches, mosques, Buddhist temples, and Hindu temples. No one claimed America was being “taken over” when other faiths built places of worship. The outrage only appeared when the temple was Hindu and the community was Indian. We all know this isn’t organic concern over zoning or aesthetics. It’s a manufactured propaganda campaign that repackages anti-Indian and anti-Hindu bigotry as “patriotism.” The goal is obvious: turn normal religious expression into evidence of an imagined civilizational invasion. America doesn’t become less American because Indian Americans build a temple, just as it didn’t because Vietnamese Americans built a Buddhist statue 24 years earlier. The selective outrage exposes the narrative for what it is: propaganda designed to manufacture fear and resentment where none existed. Religious freedom applies to everyone, not just the communities X grifters approve of. 🇺🇸🕉️ Happy July 4th Weekend to ALL AMERICANS.

Rajeev Sharma

41,919 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Cambodia has condemned the Thai army for demolishing a Hindu Vishnu statue in a disputed border area after more than two weeks of fighting between Cambodia and Thailand. According to Cambodian officials in Preah Vihear, the statue was built in 2014 and stood several hundred meters inside Cambodian territory in the An Ses area. It was destroyed on December 22 using a backhoe loader. Video of the demolition circulated widely on Thai social media and was independently verified, with no signs of manipulation. Cambodia says the statue was a religious site worshipped by Buddhist and Hindu followers and has accused Thai forces of damaging multiple cultural sites along the border during the clashes. Thailand has not commented on the incident and continues to say its operations only target military objectives. By that logic, this Hindu statue was definitely a military target.
0:40

Cambodia has condemned the Thai army for demolishing a Hindu Vishnu statue in a disputed border area after more than two weeks of fighting between Cambodia and Thailand. According to Cambodian officials in Preah Vihear, the statue was built in 2014 and stood several hundred meters inside Cambodian territory in the An Ses area. It was destroyed on December 22 using a backhoe loader. Video of the demolition circulated widely on Thai social media and was independently verified, with no signs of manipulation. Cambodia says the statue was a religious site worshipped by Buddhist and Hindu followers and has accused Thai forces of damaging multiple cultural sites along the border during the clashes. Thailand has not commented on the incident and continues to say its operations only target military objectives. By that logic, this Hindu statue was definitely a military target.

Jacob in Cambodia 🇺🇸 🇰🇭

110,394 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

In the 21st century, I no longer see that a Polish king and not a French duke who is a military leader and not a Spanish queen and king will save Europe from the clutches of Islam. There is no one to save Europe. In the historical process in which Islam has been attacking Europe for the past 1,350 years, there is no one left to save Europe from itself. By: Ofer Binshtok. * In the battle of Vienna, against Islam, in 1683, the Polish king John III Sobieski, known as the "savior of Europe", moved with his army from Poland, as an aid to save Vienna and in fact to save all of Europe from Islamic conquest from the east. * In the 8th century, the Islamic conquest reached the center of France, the Loire Valley, on its way to the heart of Europe from the southwest, from Spain. In 732 in the battle of Tours/Poitiers, Charles Martel Duke of the Franks (the Hammer), defeated Islam and actually expelled it from France and thus saved France and Europe as a whole from Islamic conquest moving towards it from Spain. * Between the 8th and 15th centuries AD in the Reconquista, in the battles of reconquest, the Spaniards saved themselves and Europe in about 700 years of struggle to expel the Islamic conqueror. Until in 1492 AD, the armies of Queen Isabella and her husband King Ferdinand drove the rest of the Islamic conquerors back to Africa. * In the last 50 years, Islam is conquering Europe from inside, through immigration, with the help of the ignorance of the left and the European Union. Ignorance when it comes to understanding Islam and its goals. After the migration, at the appropriate Islamic critical mass, the Islamic sword will also arrive. - In the 21st century, I no longer see that a Polish king and not a French duke who is a military leader and not a Spanish queen and king will save Europe from the clutches of Islam. There is no one to save Europe. ------------------------------------------- Tareq Al-Suwaidan, Ph.D. He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah. He represents the jihadist threat to humanity, and the free world in particular.
1:15

In the 21st century, I no longer see that a Polish king and not a French duke who is a military leader and not a Spanish queen and king will save Europe from the clutches of Islam. There is no one to save Europe. In the historical process in which Islam has been attacking Europe for the past 1,350 years, there is no one left to save Europe from itself. By: Ofer Binshtok. * In the battle of Vienna, against Islam, in 1683, the Polish king John III Sobieski, known as the "savior of Europe", moved with his army from Poland, as an aid to save Vienna and in fact to save all of Europe from Islamic conquest from the east. * In the 8th century, the Islamic conquest reached the center of France, the Loire Valley, on its way to the heart of Europe from the southwest, from Spain. In 732 in the battle of Tours/Poitiers, Charles Martel Duke of the Franks (the Hammer), defeated Islam and actually expelled it from France and thus saved France and Europe as a whole from Islamic conquest moving towards it from Spain. * Between the 8th and 15th centuries AD in the Reconquista, in the battles of reconquest, the Spaniards saved themselves and Europe in about 700 years of struggle to expel the Islamic conqueror. Until in 1492 AD, the armies of Queen Isabella and her husband King Ferdinand drove the rest of the Islamic conquerors back to Africa. * In the last 50 years, Islam is conquering Europe from inside, through immigration, with the help of the ignorance of the left and the European Union. Ignorance when it comes to understanding Islam and its goals. After the migration, at the appropriate Islamic critical mass, the Islamic sword will also arrive. - In the 21st century, I no longer see that a Polish king and not a French duke who is a military leader and not a Spanish queen and king will save Europe from the clutches of Islam. There is no one to save Europe. ------------------------------------------- Tareq Al-Suwaidan, Ph.D. He is currently among the most prominent jihadists. He belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood. A highly intelligent and educated person. He is well-versed in Sharia law, the history of Jihad, the Quran, and Muhammad's Sunnah. He represents the jihadist threat to humanity, and the free world in particular.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

340,073 просмотров • 1 год назад

How 'Beef Parotta' Became A Part Of "Kerala's Culture?" Today, ‘beef curry’ and ‘parotta’ are proudly flaunted as Kerala's culture. It can be seen everywhere, from the speeches of political leaders to Malayalam cinema. But was it always like this? Definitely not, it was forced into Kerala's cuisine, and ultimately its "culture." To know how, read or watch the following. Like the rest of India, the Hindus of Kerala held profound reverence for the cow, and there is a great deal of historical evidence to prove this. Famous foreign travellers like Ibn Battuta and Abdur Razzaq clearly wrote in their travelogues that slaughtering a cow in Kerala was the greatest crime, punishable by the most gruesome death. However, reverence for the cow has now become an exception in Kerala. And it is not because cow worship was not a tradition in Kerala, but because a systematic de-Hinduisation and de-sacralisation of public life has been carried out here. If we look at British records of Kerala, the slaughter of cows by Moplahs in Malabar at that time was the biggest cause of frequent Hindu-Muxlim riots, as the British refused to intervene on behalf of the Hindus. During the Moplah Riots of the 1920s, there were countless incidents where Muxlims ofnormalisation Malabar slaughtered cows in temples and forcibly fed beef to Hindus to convert them. Because the rule of the Hindu Zamorin kings ended early in Malabar and a majority of the Hindu population was converted to Islam, cow slaughter and beef consumption became commonplace in this region. Conversely, in Travancore, cow slaughter was completely banned, and in Cochin, it was severely restricted. Thus, the roots of beef normalisation in Kerala lie in the Muxlim-majority Malabar. By the 1920s, due to British patronage and their dominance in the timber trade for shipbuilding, the Moplah Muxlims of Kerala began to become economically empowered. Since Malabar was a coastal region, these Muslims had been trading in Burma and Malaysia since the beginning, and with the Gulf Oil Boom of the 1960s, they not only earned wealth in Gulf countries but also strengthened their religious orthodoxy. Meanwhile, the exact opposite was happening to the Hindus. Kerala saw the formation of India's first non-Congress government, and it was a Communist one. The Communists launched sustained ideological attacks on the sacred religious beliefs of Hindus and began to desacralize or secularize all traditional institutions. Since Christians and Muslims had gained a demographic advantage due to forced conversions, they collaborated with the Communist state to undermine Hindu beliefs. For instance, the "land reforms" of the 1970s severely broke the stronghold of the traditional Hindu elite. Following historical patterns, they began to openly offend and humiliate Hindus in Malabar using cow slaughter and beef with full state support. A prime example of this is the portrayal of beef in Malayalam cinema. As long as the cinema was dominated by middle-class and upper-caste Hindus, beef was never shown, because it was simply not a part of their culture. However, as soon as Muxlim and X-tian producers, directors, and writers established a foothold after the year 2000, they turned the forced reality of ‘beef-parotta’ into a symbol of Kerala’s food culture. And as a result of this sustained propaganda around beef in 'popular culture' (cinema, theatre, media, etc.) by the Ixlamo-Marxist next, an average Malayali Hindu who consumes all this media started believing in the narrative of beef (cow meat) as part of Kerala's culture. This systematic and exaggerated propagandist portrayal on the reel started influencing reality to a significant extent. Although even today, the majority of Hindus in Kerala do not eat beef, it remains a largely political act. However, the normalisation of beef in Kerala is a clear-cut example of how Communist and Abrahamic ideologies can subvert any native culture in a very short span of time.
2:50

How 'Beef Parotta' Became A Part Of "Kerala's Culture?" Today, ‘beef curry’ and ‘parotta’ are proudly flaunted as Kerala's culture. It can be seen everywhere, from the speeches of political leaders to Malayalam cinema. But was it always like this? Definitely not, it was forced into Kerala's cuisine, and ultimately its "culture." To know how, read or watch the following. Like the rest of India, the Hindus of Kerala held profound reverence for the cow, and there is a great deal of historical evidence to prove this. Famous foreign travellers like Ibn Battuta and Abdur Razzaq clearly wrote in their travelogues that slaughtering a cow in Kerala was the greatest crime, punishable by the most gruesome death. However, reverence for the cow has now become an exception in Kerala. And it is not because cow worship was not a tradition in Kerala, but because a systematic de-Hinduisation and de-sacralisation of public life has been carried out here. If we look at British records of Kerala, the slaughter of cows by Moplahs in Malabar at that time was the biggest cause of frequent Hindu-Muxlim riots, as the British refused to intervene on behalf of the Hindus. During the Moplah Riots of the 1920s, there were countless incidents where Muxlims ofnormalisation Malabar slaughtered cows in temples and forcibly fed beef to Hindus to convert them. Because the rule of the Hindu Zamorin kings ended early in Malabar and a majority of the Hindu population was converted to Islam, cow slaughter and beef consumption became commonplace in this region. Conversely, in Travancore, cow slaughter was completely banned, and in Cochin, it was severely restricted. Thus, the roots of beef normalisation in Kerala lie in the Muxlim-majority Malabar. By the 1920s, due to British patronage and their dominance in the timber trade for shipbuilding, the Moplah Muxlims of Kerala began to become economically empowered. Since Malabar was a coastal region, these Muslims had been trading in Burma and Malaysia since the beginning, and with the Gulf Oil Boom of the 1960s, they not only earned wealth in Gulf countries but also strengthened their religious orthodoxy. Meanwhile, the exact opposite was happening to the Hindus. Kerala saw the formation of India's first non-Congress government, and it was a Communist one. The Communists launched sustained ideological attacks on the sacred religious beliefs of Hindus and began to desacralize or secularize all traditional institutions. Since Christians and Muslims had gained a demographic advantage due to forced conversions, they collaborated with the Communist state to undermine Hindu beliefs. For instance, the "land reforms" of the 1970s severely broke the stronghold of the traditional Hindu elite. Following historical patterns, they began to openly offend and humiliate Hindus in Malabar using cow slaughter and beef with full state support. A prime example of this is the portrayal of beef in Malayalam cinema. As long as the cinema was dominated by middle-class and upper-caste Hindus, beef was never shown, because it was simply not a part of their culture. However, as soon as Muxlim and X-tian producers, directors, and writers established a foothold after the year 2000, they turned the forced reality of ‘beef-parotta’ into a symbol of Kerala’s food culture. And as a result of this sustained propaganda around beef in 'popular culture' (cinema, theatre, media, etc.) by the Ixlamo-Marxist next, an average Malayali Hindu who consumes all this media started believing in the narrative of beef (cow meat) as part of Kerala's culture. This systematic and exaggerated propagandist portrayal on the reel started influencing reality to a significant extent. Although even today, the majority of Hindus in Kerala do not eat beef, it remains a largely political act. However, the normalisation of beef in Kerala is a clear-cut example of how Communist and Abrahamic ideologies can subvert any native culture in a very short span of time.

Prateek

575,029 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

By the time the Walk for Peace arrived in D.C., 108 days and 2,300 miles after leaving Fort Worth, it had become a social media phenomenon and an unexpected inspirational tether for millions who followed the Buddhist monks’ trek online and the tens of thousands of people across eight states who greeted them along the way. “It's not about Buddhism,” said Bhikkhu Pannakara at a gathering in D.C. “Mindfulness is for all beings. It’s your duty to unlock it.”
1:06

By the time the Walk for Peace arrived in D.C., 108 days and 2,300 miles after leaving Fort Worth, it had become a social media phenomenon and an unexpected inspirational tether for millions who followed the Buddhist monks’ trek online and the tens of thousands of people across eight states who greeted them along the way. “It's not about Buddhism,” said Bhikkhu Pannakara at a gathering in D.C. “Mindfulness is for all beings. It’s your duty to unlock it.”

The Washington Post

45,050 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A country created on the basis of religious separation, where Hindu communities were erased, is today adopting the very civilisational traditions it once chose to distance itself from. What is presented as “cultural practice” increasingly reflects unacknowledged borrowing from Hindu customs. Pakistanis are stealing from Hindus yet again and this is how : 1. A Pakistani wedding video shows a Muslim bride performing the bidai ritual, throwing rice (laiyya), a deeply symbolic Hindu tradition of gratitude and blessing for prosperity. 2. Pakistani actress Hania Aamir incorporating the varmala ritual in her fake wedding celebration. 3. Continued celebration of Basant, a festival with deep roots in the Indian subcontinent’s Hindu cultural traditions. These traditions were rejected in the name of religious identity by Pakistanis, why are they embracing Hindu culture now? Shameless country, shameless people.
0:38

A country created on the basis of religious separation, where Hindu communities were erased, is today adopting the very civilisational traditions it once chose to distance itself from. What is presented as “cultural practice” increasingly reflects unacknowledged borrowing from Hindu customs. Pakistanis are stealing from Hindus yet again and this is how : 1. A Pakistani wedding video shows a Muslim bride performing the bidai ritual, throwing rice (laiyya), a deeply symbolic Hindu tradition of gratitude and blessing for prosperity. 2. Pakistani actress Hania Aamir incorporating the varmala ritual in her fake wedding celebration. 3. Continued celebration of Basant, a festival with deep roots in the Indian subcontinent’s Hindu cultural traditions. These traditions were rejected in the name of religious identity by Pakistanis, why are they embracing Hindu culture now? Shameless country, shameless people.

BALA

26,889 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад