正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Here is James Lindsay criticizing Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ for pursuing the same objectives as Lindsay. Lindsay doesn’t like that Rufo has relied on Burnham as a ‘former Marxist’ - even though Burnham is a totally mainstream dead NR guy. But Lindsay can’t even remember Burnham’s name.

181,782 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Post-Liberals' Shocking Plan: Let Democrats Win to Radicalize the Right! Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. In a recent episode of "The Andrea Shaffer Show," James Lindsay discussed what he describes as a deliberate strategy among certain post-liberal right figures to undermine President Trump's agenda. Lindsay explained that some in this group advocate allowing Democrats to regain control, anticipating that this would lead to governance as problematic as or worse than the Biden or Obama administrations. Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. According to Lindsay, these individuals view this as a necessary step toward installing a true right-wing dictator figure. Lindsay highlighted that this approach stems from dissatisfaction with Trump's perceived moderation. He noted that President Trump is seen by these critics as too mainstream and not aggressive enough in addressing the nation's issues. He pointed out that if Trump's policies succeed and deliver results, with people recognizing that this energy could genuinely make America great again, it would hinder the emergence of a more radical paleoconservative or post-liberal party. Lindsay added that figures like Tucker Carlson, whom he described as a paleoconservative with various allegiances, seek a much more extreme right-wing party and view MAGA as having overshadowed that vision. To achieve their aims, Lindsay argued, these post-liberals would work to ensure Trump appears pinned down, particularly through Democratic gains in Congress during midterms. This would prevent him from fully implementing his agenda, leaving many initiatives incomplete or reversed. The narrative would then shift to claim that Trump failed because he was not hardline enough or strong enough. Lindsay referenced hearing similar rhetoric from individuals such as Auron McIntyre and Curtis Yarvin, who have said that President Trump is only doing one or two percent of what is needed to solve the problems at hand. Lindsay emphasized the repeated claim that Trump is not going nearly far enough. Ultimately, Lindsay contended that by engineering Trump's perceived failure, these voices aim to radicalize the base further. They would position a new demagogue to rise, promising to fix what Trump could not by going even farther, even too far if necessary. Lindsay stressed that some post-liberals have explicitly outlined this as their plan, though he noted uncertainty about whether Tucker Carlson has stated it directly. This perspective frames the current political moment as a battle not just against the left, but against elements within the right pushing for acceleration toward authoritarian extremes.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

16,440 次观看 • 6 个月前

'The issue is always the revolution': Dr. James Lindsay on Marxism's societal infiltration Dr. James Lindsay discussed how Marxist ideology has been repackaged as identity politics and used to further dangerous 'oppressor versus oppressed' narratives. James Lindsay, anti-Communist described how what is commonly referred to as the 'woke' left has adopted Marxist-like thought processes like identity politics. "The woke on the left, or what we've been calling woke, took up postmodernism, they took up identity politics, re-located the Marxist analysis through identity categories rather than through economic analysis," he said. Lindsay explained that while the roots of Marxism revolve around economic class struggle, its modern iterations view people through race or other immutable characteristics. This inevitably leads to harmful 'oppressor versus oppressed' narratives, he asserts. This 'oppressor versus oppressed' ideology can lead people to believe that targeting someone solely based off their race is acceptable, Lindsay said. "Because they are 'oppressed', anything is justified. Whether it's kind of post-colonial violence, which is kind of the setting it usually takes place, [or] whether it's terrorism, going back to Marx's endorsement of revolutionary terrorism," he explained. Lindsay’s insights reveal the 'woke' left’s Marxist roots, threatening societal cohesion with harmful revolutionary ideologies FULL REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

16,499 次观看 • 10 个月前

Turning Point USA's Precarious Position Amid Tucker Carlson's Nick Fuentes Interview! "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that." Today in an interview with Brannon Howse, cultural critic James Lindsay dissected the mounting tensions surrounding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its founder Charlie Kirk, exacerbated by Tucker Carlson's decision to platform far-right provocateur Nick Fuentes. Lindsay, a longtime observer of ideological battles within conservative circles, highlighted how Fuentes has long posed a disruptive force to TPUSA, now amplified by Carlson's high-profile engagement. Lindsay explained that Fuentes has spent "most of a decade" targeting TPUSA and Kirk, operating "parasitically off of Turning Point events to try to grow a following" while creating ongoing problems. He pointed to Fuentes' recent escalations, including "awful things" directed at Kirk's wife, the organization itself, and Kirk personally. Despite this history of antagonism, Carlson chose to interview Fuentes in what Lindsay described as "the most gentle kind of... positive, let's give you a nice profile" manner—far from the "hard-hitting" style Carlson employs with mainstream figures like Ted Cruz. This soft approach, Lindsay noted, stands in stark contrast to Fuentes' entrenched hostility toward TPUSA, rendering the situation "very awkward," especially as Carlson remains a headliner for the group's events. Speculating on Carlson's intentions, Lindsay suggested the interview might be a deliberate jab at TPUSA. "I think that in fact Tucker is doing this partly to attack Turning Point, if you ask me what my opinion is about that," he stated. He further pondered whether Carlson was angling for cancellation to manufacture controversy, posing the question: "Is he trying to get Turning Point to cancel him and therefore create controversy?" This development places TPUSA in a "very tough bind," according to Lindsay, who outlined the organization's limited paths forward. One option is to firmly disinvite Carlson, declaring, as Lindsay advocated, "we draw the line here. This Nick Fuentes thing was too far. He had so much animosity to TPUSA, to Charlie, to everything." Such a move, however, would invite fierce backlash, with Carlson likely retorting, "Well, I'm being censored. Turning Point USA is controlled by Jews or whatever it happens to be," thereby "turn[ing] up the volume on an attack against TPUSA to maximum volume." The alternative, Lindsay warned, is for TPUSA to rally behind Carlson, echoing recent defenses from figures like Andrew Klavan, who tweeted about "all rowing in the same direction." Yet this stance would saddle the organization with Fuentes' toxic associations through a "transitive property," given Carlson's glowing profile of him. Fuentes, laden with "all of his baggage," has waged what he called "groper wars" on TPUSA "repeatedly trying to destroy the organization" and positioning himself as a "direct personal enemy of Charlie and everything he stood for."Ultimately, Lindsay urged TPUSA to seize the moment as a turning point; ironically, of its own making. "I think the right option is to use this as the opportunity to draw the line and say enough is enough," he advised. "I don't know what Tucker's doing. We wish him well. We hope he gets back... in alignment with clear thinking, but we can't have this at our event." Acknowledging the inevitable "viciously attacked" response, Lindsay framed the choice as a necessary stand for integrity amid the conservative movement's fracturing alliances.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

42,840 次观看 • 8 个月前