Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Here is James Lindsay criticizing Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ for pursuing the same objectives as Lindsay. Lindsay doesn’t like that Rufo has relied on Burnham as a ‘former Marxist’ - even though Burnham is a totally mainstream dead NR guy. But Lindsay can’t even remember Burnham’s name.

181,782 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Post-Liberals' Shocking Plan: Let Democrats Win to Radicalize the Right! Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. In a recent episode of "The Andrea Shaffer Show," James Lindsay discussed what he describes as a deliberate strategy among certain post-liberal right figures to undermine President Trump's agenda. Lindsay explained that some in this group advocate allowing Democrats to regain control, anticipating that this would lead to governance as problematic as or worse than the Biden or Obama administrations. Lindsay stated that the goal is to radicalize the Republican base, paving the way for voters to support a far more extreme right-wing leader in 2028 or 2032. According to Lindsay, these individuals view this as a necessary step toward installing a true right-wing dictator figure. Lindsay highlighted that this approach stems from dissatisfaction with Trump's perceived moderation. He noted that President Trump is seen by these critics as too mainstream and not aggressive enough in addressing the nation's issues. He pointed out that if Trump's policies succeed and deliver results, with people recognizing that this energy could genuinely make America great again, it would hinder the emergence of a more radical paleoconservative or post-liberal party. Lindsay added that figures like Tucker Carlson, whom he described as a paleoconservative with various allegiances, seek a much more extreme right-wing party and view MAGA as having overshadowed that vision. To achieve their aims, Lindsay argued, these post-liberals would work to ensure Trump appears pinned down, particularly through Democratic gains in Congress during midterms. This would prevent him from fully implementing his agenda, leaving many initiatives incomplete or reversed. The narrative would then shift to claim that Trump failed because he was not hardline enough or strong enough. Lindsay referenced hearing similar rhetoric from individuals such as Auron McIntyre and Curtis Yarvin, who have said that President Trump is only doing one or two percent of what is needed to solve the problems at hand. Lindsay emphasized the repeated claim that Trump is not going nearly far enough. Ultimately, Lindsay contended that by engineering Trump's perceived failure, these voices aim to radicalize the base further. They would position a new demagogue to rise, promising to fix what Trump could not by going even farther, even too far if necessary. Lindsay stressed that some post-liberals have explicitly outlined this as their plan, though he noted uncertainty about whether Tucker Carlson has stated it directly. This perspective frames the current political moment as a battle not just against the left, but against elements within the right pushing for acceleration toward authoritarian extremes.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

16,440 views • 8 months ago