Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨🚨 Here it is: King Solomon Reporting: The protection racket surrounding Democrats—deliberately REDACTED as part of a cover-up—is about to be UNREDACTED, soon as tomorrow. “There was protection racket that was around Democrats, whether it was Hillary and Bill Clinton or Joe Biden or Hunter Biden. We keep seeing...

Real_RobN's profile picture

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

311,347 subscribers

59,719 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In addition to his new document release about the Clinton Foundation, John Solomon is releasing more documents tomorrow that will show the redactions in the previously released documents about James Comey 💥 “I believe because of the good work of Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, we’re gonna get to see what’s behind those redactions. I think it’s gonna shock people. I think we’re gonna see some pretty clear evidence of what the lieutenants working for James Comey were told to do. I think when people see it tomorrow, they’ll get a real shock of just how much evidence the government had and didn’t pursue.” I love being shocked these days.
2:37

In addition to his new document release about the Clinton Foundation, John Solomon is releasing more documents tomorrow that will show the redactions in the previously released documents about James Comey 💥 “I believe because of the good work of Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, we’re gonna get to see what’s behind those redactions. I think it’s gonna shock people. I think we’re gonna see some pretty clear evidence of what the lieutenants working for James Comey were told to do. I think when people see it tomorrow, they’ll get a real shock of just how much evidence the government had and didn’t pursue.” I love being shocked these days.

TheStormHasArrived

130,437 views • 1 year ago

Maria Bartiromo asks both Matt Taibbi and Viceroy Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 who’s next up for indictments: TAIBBI: “John Brennan, James Clapper, for instance. I was also told REPEATEDLY that Hillary Clinton was a target of some of these investigations…” VICEROY DAVIS: “I think it goes all the way up to the TOP. To President Obama, to VP Biden, to Hillary Clinton, Comey, Brennan, Clapper…and I think it also includes the law-fare Democrats, these prosecutors who co-ordinated with the Biden White House…”
1:35

Maria Bartiromo asks both Matt Taibbi and Viceroy Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 who’s next up for indictments: TAIBBI: “John Brennan, James Clapper, for instance. I was also told REPEATEDLY that Hillary Clinton was a target of some of these investigations…” VICEROY DAVIS: “I think it goes all the way up to the TOP. To President Obama, to VP Biden, to Hillary Clinton, Comey, Brennan, Clapper…and I think it also includes the law-fare Democrats, these prosecutors who co-ordinated with the Biden White House…”

MAGA Kitty

262,294 views • 10 months ago

John Solomon joined Hannity to discuss the new evidence that the Biden DOJ & FBI were spying on Republican Senators and one Congressman. We are going to learn more in the next few days from Kash Patel & Pam Bondi. “There’s a very serious separation of powers issue here. Why did the Executive Branch take this thing? What did they tell the grand jurors? What was the predicate? Did they really have any crimes or were they fishing? And were they intruding on a constitutionally protected event? And I think those are things that we’re going to learn more from in the next coming days, from Kash Patel (and) probably tomorrow with Pam Bondi on Capitol Hill.” Can you imagine if it were reversed and they had evidence that Republicans were spying on Democrats? We have to see accountability.
2:39

John Solomon joined Hannity to discuss the new evidence that the Biden DOJ & FBI were spying on Republican Senators and one Congressman. We are going to learn more in the next few days from Kash Patel & Pam Bondi. “There’s a very serious separation of powers issue here. Why did the Executive Branch take this thing? What did they tell the grand jurors? What was the predicate? Did they really have any crimes or were they fishing? And were they intruding on a constitutionally protected event? And I think those are things that we’re going to learn more from in the next coming days, from Kash Patel (and) probably tomorrow with Pam Bondi on Capitol Hill.” Can you imagine if it were reversed and they had evidence that Republicans were spying on Democrats? We have to see accountability.

TheStormHasArrived

32,245 views • 10 months ago

🚨FBI Director Kash Patel confirms a definitive answer on whether FBI sources were present during J6 is coming soon. Says it will “surprise and shock” everyone. “I told you I would get you the definitive answer. And we have. We are in the process of working with our partners to divulge that information.” “The answer to that question will surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it.”
2:02

🚨FBI Director Kash Patel confirms a definitive answer on whether FBI sources were present during J6 is coming soon. Says it will “surprise and shock” everyone. “I told you I would get you the definitive answer. And we have. We are in the process of working with our partners to divulge that information.” “The answer to that question will surprise and shock people because of what past FBI leaders have said about it.”

Benny Johnson

904,964 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Roy on phone record provision in government funding bill: "There were Democrats and Republicans involved with it. But look, I think there's going to be a lot of people if they look and understand this, they're going to see it as a self-serving, self-dealing kind of stuff. And I don't think that's right... The potential to have dollars going to United States senators when we've got American citizens, whether it was J6ers, whether it's people from the FACE Act, whether it was others that have also had the full force of the federal government through the Department of Justice targeting and coming down on them, and they're going to say, oh, you can slide in a provision in here for United States senators. It is beside my comprehension that this got put in the bill, and it's why people have such a low opinion of this town."
1:37

Rep. Roy on phone record provision in government funding bill: "There were Democrats and Republicans involved with it. But look, I think there's going to be a lot of people if they look and understand this, they're going to see it as a self-serving, self-dealing kind of stuff. And I don't think that's right... The potential to have dollars going to United States senators when we've got American citizens, whether it was J6ers, whether it's people from the FACE Act, whether it was others that have also had the full force of the federal government through the Department of Justice targeting and coming down on them, and they're going to say, oh, you can slide in a provision in here for United States senators. It is beside my comprehension that this got put in the bill, and it's why people have such a low opinion of this town."

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

23,439 views • 9 months ago

“I think we’ll see a bunch of significant arrests and indictments in the next few months.” Fascinating conversation between John Solomon and Don Jr. about how the Trump DOJ is using innovative tactics to bring the accountability we’ve all been waiting for. Solomon predicts that indictments and arrests are coming in the April/May timeframe. “Pretty soon I wouldn’t be surprised if Kash Patel is putting handcuffs, or certainly booking John Brennan based on what we’re hearing down in Florida. There are some people that went and got phone records of Susie Wiles, they could be arrested soon. So you’re beginning to see machinery, which was very slow at the beginning, because you had to get this evidence put together - now starting to get into targeted prosecutions, targeted arrests - and I think a lot of that is going to happen in the April/May timeframe. I think we’ll see a bunch of significant arrests and indictments in the next few months.” Would be huge if we could just get one (or many) big name indictment(s) before the midterms. It would inject so much life into all of us 🙏 John Solomon Donald Trump Jr.
3:56

“I think we’ll see a bunch of significant arrests and indictments in the next few months.” Fascinating conversation between John Solomon and Don Jr. about how the Trump DOJ is using innovative tactics to bring the accountability we’ve all been waiting for. Solomon predicts that indictments and arrests are coming in the April/May timeframe. “Pretty soon I wouldn’t be surprised if Kash Patel is putting handcuffs, or certainly booking John Brennan based on what we’re hearing down in Florida. There are some people that went and got phone records of Susie Wiles, they could be arrested soon. So you’re beginning to see machinery, which was very slow at the beginning, because you had to get this evidence put together - now starting to get into targeted prosecutions, targeted arrests - and I think a lot of that is going to happen in the April/May timeframe. I think we’ll see a bunch of significant arrests and indictments in the next few months.” Would be huge if we could just get one (or many) big name indictment(s) before the midterms. It would inject so much life into all of us 🙏 John Solomon Donald Trump Jr.

TheStormHasArrived

109,610 views • 4 months ago

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."
1:21

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Sense Receptor

130,653 views • 11 months ago

An honest and transparent Pascal Siakam after the Pacers fall to 6-24: “When we decide that losing is not ok, we’re gonna go somewhere. But if we go out there every single day and it just feels like, okay, we lost another game, it does not matter, we’re just gonna keep sinking. I don’t think we’re gonna get out of it, until when you lose and you go home and it really hurts you. Like if it doesn’t matter, we’re just gonna keep coming in here and do the same thing and lose every night and it’s gonna be it is what it is. Like, who cares? We just lost another game, it doesn’t matter. I don’t like that feeling. And if we don’t decide to change that, it’s not gonna change. We have to make it happen. Nobody is going to feel sorry for us. We can’t blame the schedule. The day that we decide that we’re tired of it, I think we’re gonna go somewhere.”
0:58

An honest and transparent Pascal Siakam after the Pacers fall to 6-24: “When we decide that losing is not ok, we’re gonna go somewhere. But if we go out there every single day and it just feels like, okay, we lost another game, it does not matter, we’re just gonna keep sinking. I don’t think we’re gonna get out of it, until when you lose and you go home and it really hurts you. Like if it doesn’t matter, we’re just gonna keep coming in here and do the same thing and lose every night and it’s gonna be it is what it is. Like, who cares? We just lost another game, it doesn’t matter. I don’t like that feeling. And if we don’t decide to change that, it’s not gonna change. We have to make it happen. Nobody is going to feel sorry for us. We can’t blame the schedule. The day that we decide that we’re tired of it, I think we’re gonna go somewhere.”

Alex Golden

868,460 views • 7 months ago

Josh Barnett reveals his reasoning for ending Bloodsport: “I wasn’t trying to make a big deal out of it. I didn’t want it to come off as a gimmick. There were a lot of conflicting feelings within my own heart about whether this was going to be the case or not. When all is said and done, I feel like I absolutely made the right choice here. It wasn’t for anything negative. There wasn’t a tragedy, and there wasn’t some overarching bad issue or problem in that sense. For me, Bloodsport had an evolution of where it was trying to get to, and we’re just not there—we’re not close. For me, it was better to end it now than to keep going and, quite possibly, diminish what the product is.”
5:08

Josh Barnett reveals his reasoning for ending Bloodsport: “I wasn’t trying to make a big deal out of it. I didn’t want it to come off as a gimmick. There were a lot of conflicting feelings within my own heart about whether this was going to be the case or not. When all is said and done, I feel like I absolutely made the right choice here. It wasn’t for anything negative. There wasn’t a tragedy, and there wasn’t some overarching bad issue or problem in that sense. For me, Bloodsport had an evolution of where it was trying to get to, and we’re just not there—we’re not close. For me, it was better to end it now than to keep going and, quite possibly, diminish what the product is.”

Ariel Helwani

255,082 views • 4 months ago

They passed it in the middle of the night…and most of them didn’t even read it. Rep. Randy Fine RIPS THE MASK OFF the Senate bill after being asked why he opposes it. FINE: “Well, I don’t know how hard they did they work.” “They passed it at 3 o’clock in the morning, when there were 5 Senators there.” “We’ve been told many of the Senators didn’t even know about it because they started writing it after midnight.” “So I don’t know how hard it was.” “Now it’s clear that they wanted to get on vacation. I think that was the focus.” “But it didn’t do what you claim, that bill does not end the shutdown. The shutdown was going to continue for thousands and thousands of federal employees who work at ICE and Border Protection, including those who investigate child trafficking of little girls.” “So it wasn’t going to end. It was just going to be less.” “And we said, no, we either take care of the country or we keep on fighting.”
0:43

They passed it in the middle of the night…and most of them didn’t even read it. Rep. Randy Fine RIPS THE MASK OFF the Senate bill after being asked why he opposes it. FINE: “Well, I don’t know how hard they did they work.” “They passed it at 3 o’clock in the morning, when there were 5 Senators there.” “We’ve been told many of the Senators didn’t even know about it because they started writing it after midnight.” “So I don’t know how hard it was.” “Now it’s clear that they wanted to get on vacation. I think that was the focus.” “But it didn’t do what you claim, that bill does not end the shutdown. The shutdown was going to continue for thousands and thousands of federal employees who work at ICE and Border Protection, including those who investigate child trafficking of little girls.” “So it wasn’t going to end. It was just going to be less.” “And we said, no, we either take care of the country or we keep on fighting.”

Overton

41,874 views • 4 months ago

Asmongold feels bad for being in favor of Blizzard during the harassment scandal, saying it wasn't as true as it seemed 👀 "I feel kind of bad about this. I do, because at the time, I was very much in favour of the Blizzard harassment scandal, and to be fair, there was not really a lot of evidence to say the contrary But I do kind of feel bad that I was a part of this, and I enabled this to the degree that I did. And it seems like it wasn't really as true as it seemed out to be. We all were. I think that everybody kind of believed it”
0:53

Asmongold feels bad for being in favor of Blizzard during the harassment scandal, saying it wasn't as true as it seemed 👀 "I feel kind of bad about this. I do, because at the time, I was very much in favour of the Blizzard harassment scandal, and to be fair, there was not really a lot of evidence to say the contrary But I do kind of feel bad that I was a part of this, and I enabled this to the degree that I did. And it seems like it wasn't really as true as it seemed out to be. We all were. I think that everybody kind of believed it”

Prism

60,628 views • 13 days ago

Top Democrats are saying their devastating shut down was “WORTH IT” - Dana Perino says the Dems’ message is loud and clear: YOU ARE EXPENDABLE “If you look at those clips about how they say it was worth it, think about if you were one of those people who missed a wedding because your flight was cancelled. Or you didn’t get home in time for little league… The Democrats are saying that you are expendable. That it was ok, it was worth it because now we’re gonna talk about subsidies for Obamacare.”
1:23

Top Democrats are saying their devastating shut down was “WORTH IT” - Dana Perino says the Dems’ message is loud and clear: YOU ARE EXPENDABLE “If you look at those clips about how they say it was worth it, think about if you were one of those people who missed a wedding because your flight was cancelled. Or you didn’t get home in time for little league… The Democrats are saying that you are expendable. That it was ok, it was worth it because now we’re gonna talk about subsidies for Obamacare.”

The Five

25,854 views • 9 months ago

“These people will not be let off the hook.” - FBI Director Kash Patel Kash sat down with Lara Trump and laid out where we stand in the process of holding people accountable for Russiagate & Arctic Frost. “We’ve built squads for both Russiagate and Arctic Frost and we’re using a grand jury process, and we are issuing - I think we are up to like 75 of 100 subpoenas already - for witnesses. That’s what you target first. We also have targets of our investigation. People we think committed acts of criminal conduct… We are not only exposing what they did, but they are frantically - “they,” the media, the mainstream media and those that were involved in the weaponization of justice - are trying to cover it up… You think that’s gonna stop me and the deputy here? We’re gonna get there. We’re already halfway there on a lot of it. I firmly believe that this Comey case is far from over. We are not finished. We are formulating a plan to make sure that we use the Constitution to hold people accountable… These people will not be let off the hook.” Go get em, Kash.
2:41

“These people will not be let off the hook.” - FBI Director Kash Patel Kash sat down with Lara Trump and laid out where we stand in the process of holding people accountable for Russiagate & Arctic Frost. “We’ve built squads for both Russiagate and Arctic Frost and we’re using a grand jury process, and we are issuing - I think we are up to like 75 of 100 subpoenas already - for witnesses. That’s what you target first. We also have targets of our investigation. People we think committed acts of criminal conduct… We are not only exposing what they did, but they are frantically - “they,” the media, the mainstream media and those that were involved in the weaponization of justice - are trying to cover it up… You think that’s gonna stop me and the deputy here? We’re gonna get there. We’re already halfway there on a lot of it. I firmly believe that this Comey case is far from over. We are not finished. We are formulating a plan to make sure that we use the Constitution to hold people accountable… These people will not be let off the hook.” Go get em, Kash.

TheStormHasArrived

44,232 views • 8 months ago

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."
2:21

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

348,031 views • 1 month ago

NEW: Jake Tapper awkwardly laughs when Bill Maher says Jill Biden is being unfairly blamed for the cover-up of Joe Biden’s mental decline. MAHER: “I feel Jill Biden’s getting the Yoko treatment.” JAKE TAPPER: (Laughs) MAHER: “Maybe she deserves it. But Yoko didn’t break up the Beatles.” TAPPER: “There was a period, 2023, 2024. Democratic lawmakers barely saw the president. And yes, I think it was Jill Biden. I also think it’s Hunter Biden. I also think President Biden has some agency here, too. We’re not saying it was Weekend at Bernie’s. He was aware of what was going on.” (Audience Laughs)
1:27

NEW: Jake Tapper awkwardly laughs when Bill Maher says Jill Biden is being unfairly blamed for the cover-up of Joe Biden’s mental decline. MAHER: “I feel Jill Biden’s getting the Yoko treatment.” JAKE TAPPER: (Laughs) MAHER: “Maybe she deserves it. But Yoko didn’t break up the Beatles.” TAPPER: “There was a period, 2023, 2024. Democratic lawmakers barely saw the president. And yes, I think it was Jill Biden. I also think it’s Hunter Biden. I also think President Biden has some agency here, too. We’re not saying it was Weekend at Bernie’s. He was aware of what was going on.” (Audience Laughs)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

735,586 views • 1 year ago

Would you consider granting clemency or a pardon to Hunter Biden? Trump: I don't think it's appropriate for me to talk about it. I think it's a tragic story. You want to know the truth? And I felt that with Hillary Clinton, too. You know, with Hillary Clinton, I could have done things to her that would have made your head spin. I thought it was a very bad thing. Take the wife of a president of the United States and put her in jail. And then I see the way they treat me. That's the way it goes. But I was very protective of her. Nobody would understand that, but I was. I think my people understand it. They used to say, lock her up. Lock her up. And I'd say, just relax, please. We won the election. I think it would be very. I think it would have been horrible for our country.
2:25

Would you consider granting clemency or a pardon to Hunter Biden? Trump: I don't think it's appropriate for me to talk about it. I think it's a tragic story. You want to know the truth? And I felt that with Hillary Clinton, too. You know, with Hillary Clinton, I could have done things to her that would have made your head spin. I thought it was a very bad thing. Take the wife of a president of the United States and put her in jail. And then I see the way they treat me. That's the way it goes. But I was very protective of her. Nobody would understand that, but I was. I think my people understand it. They used to say, lock her up. Lock her up. And I'd say, just relax, please. We won the election. I think it would be very. I think it would have been horrible for our country.

Simon Ateba

3,213,377 views • 2 years ago

Qullamaggie shows His First Run to 100k "Interested in the first run up to 200k,? No, to 100k. Want to see how large your spurts were? OK. So, let's see here. Yeah, it's kind of hard to see. But yeah, I went from about 43,000 to 100,000 in just three months, I think. Yeah, that was in a straight line. I went in a straight line to 135,000. So, I pretty much quadrupled my account. No, tripled my accounts in about three months back in early 2014. And then I shorted PLUG. And I kind of lost... That was my biggest loss back then. I think I lost like 35,000, 40,000. I'm gonna show you guys where I lost. That was my first big loss that I remember. I felt really shitty about it. I'm gonna move it. On this day here, or was... Yeah, on this day here, March 10, 2014. I think I lost about 30% of my account or 25% of my account shorting this thing. Then it crashed. I don't think I made many money that day. I don't think I had borrows or... There was something. But I do remember on this day here... These two days when it stopped bounce about 50% in two sessions. I made most of that big loss back. And after that, it was pretty much straight up again. As you can see on the chart, it's pretty much straight up. And the next big loss came back in October 2014 where I lost, I think I lost 50% of my money that day. Or close to. No, wait, I think it was... Anyway, I think it was 30 or 40% or something. I don't remember. Yeah, it's kind of hard to see. Yeah, up to 100k, 43k to 100k was pretty smooth. But yeah, I don't have the data. You know, the data from 2011, 2012 and 2013. Like back in 2011 and 2012, I blew up like three or four times. Unfortunately, I don't have the data for it. I didn't keep any records. And 2013, I kind of stabilized. I think I went sideways. And the second half of 2013 is when I started making money. I think my accounts went from like 6 or 8,000 to 43,000 in the last six months of 2013"
3:11

Qullamaggie shows His First Run to 100k "Interested in the first run up to 200k,? No, to 100k. Want to see how large your spurts were? OK. So, let's see here. Yeah, it's kind of hard to see. But yeah, I went from about 43,000 to 100,000 in just three months, I think. Yeah, that was in a straight line. I went in a straight line to 135,000. So, I pretty much quadrupled my account. No, tripled my accounts in about three months back in early 2014. And then I shorted PLUG. And I kind of lost... That was my biggest loss back then. I think I lost like 35,000, 40,000. I'm gonna show you guys where I lost. That was my first big loss that I remember. I felt really shitty about it. I'm gonna move it. On this day here, or was... Yeah, on this day here, March 10, 2014. I think I lost about 30% of my account or 25% of my account shorting this thing. Then it crashed. I don't think I made many money that day. I don't think I had borrows or... There was something. But I do remember on this day here... These two days when it stopped bounce about 50% in two sessions. I made most of that big loss back. And after that, it was pretty much straight up again. As you can see on the chart, it's pretty much straight up. And the next big loss came back in October 2014 where I lost, I think I lost 50% of my money that day. Or close to. No, wait, I think it was... Anyway, I think it was 30 or 40% or something. I don't remember. Yeah, it's kind of hard to see. Yeah, up to 100k, 43k to 100k was pretty smooth. But yeah, I don't have the data. You know, the data from 2011, 2012 and 2013. Like back in 2011 and 2012, I blew up like three or four times. Unfortunately, I don't have the data for it. I didn't keep any records. And 2013, I kind of stabilized. I think I went sideways. And the second half of 2013 is when I started making money. I think my accounts went from like 6 or 8,000 to 43,000 in the last six months of 2013"

Lone

61,148 views • 9 months ago