Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Here we go again - this is version #3 Meghan Markle claims TWO 'royal racists' spoke about Archie's skin Version #1 Harry said during the Oprah interview it was only ONE person and M wasn’t even there Version #2 Harry said during the Tom Bradby interview M never said...

667,789 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is why people call Prince Harry and Meghan Markle “FUCKING GRIFTERS.” Meghan Markle sat with Oprah and raised claims about discussions surrounding Archie’s skin colour in an interview that ignited worldwide accusations of racism against the Royal Family. The media ran with it. People condemned them. Reputations were dragged through the mud. This happened while Prince Philip was seriously ill and Queen Elizabeth was in her final years. Then years later Harry said: “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” Read that again. They received awards connected to fighting racism, stayed silent while the world condemned the Royal Family as racist, accepted the praise and sympathy that followed… and years later Harry says, “We never said the Royal Family was racist. The British press said that.” So which was it? Because you do not get to benefit from the implication, collect the rewards, then later blame everyone else for understanding exactly what was implied. You cannot drop something that explosive into the public domain, stay silent while the world interprets it exactly as many did, then years later act as though everyone misunderstood or pretend the meaning changed? That isn’t misunderstanding. That’s manipulation. And the hypocrisy never stops. The same people who accuse the Royal Family of cruelty, leaking and exploitation continue trading on royal titles, royal links and royal status because without that connection, what exactly is left? What’s funny is the “leaking” apparently packed its bags and moved to Montecito with Harry and Meghan. Because according to them, the problem was always the Royal Family and the institution… yet somehow the interviews, complaints, anonymous sources, documentaries, books and endless revelations never stopped. Strange how the leaking didn’t stay behind. The endless victim narrative seems to be collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions and more people are finally seeing it for what it is. Maybe that’s why the failures keep piling up, the isolation keeps growing and trust keeps disappearing. Because sooner or later people get tired of selective truths and watching blame be thrown at everyone except the ones holding the microphone. You can fool people for a while. You can reshape stories. You can monetise grievances. But eventually the story starts shifting and that’s the problem with lies… the details keep changing because fiction needs maintenance while truth doesn’t. And that’s the thing about the internet. It remembers. And unlike carefully curated narratives, receipts don’t age.

Queen Esther

98,743 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад