Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Here’s a problem. When a Black political leader whose entire career is built upon the slogan of “land expropriation” stands in front of White landowners and reassures them that only unused land will be taken, while “productive” land will be spared, he’s not fighting dispossession. He’s managing it. He’s... saying: It’s okay for you to keep the land, as long as you’re extracting value from it. In that exact moment, land stops being a site of justice or historical redress. It becomes a productive asset, judged only by its economic output, not by how it was acquired or who was dispossessed to make it “productive” in the first place. That’s not radical. It’s violent capitalism. And in a country like South Africa, where the entire architecture of land ownership was violently constructed around White supremacy, “productive land” just means White-owned land. So protecting “productive land” is functionally indistinguishable from protecting the status quo. With this line of argument, the dispossessed aren’t being offered land. They’re being offered food security. They’re told to wait a little longer, for “growth”, for “partnerships”, for jobs, for benevolence from their “bosses”. In fact, this logic says: if you’re a current landowner, all you need to do to avoid expropriation is start farming harder. That’s it. Just produce and there will be no land redress. This is not land reform. It’s land perform. It’s a theatrical gesture of justice that leaves the underlying power structure untouched. Worse, it launders morality: White landowners are cast as generous “partners”, while the dispossessed are still left begging, just more politely. This isn’t revolution. It’s reconciliation with capital. And it’s very unserious.show more

Sizwe SikaMusi

119,442 subscribers

24,319 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Yorum

Sizwe SikaMusi profil fotoğrafı

Sizwe SikaMusi1 yıl önce

Link to full video:

General Jojo Nqandela profil fotoğrafı

General Jojo Nqandela1 yıl önce

When a black political leader whose entire career is built on political action instead of sloganeering stands in front of the nation and says "land must be expropriated without compensation", he is taking the fight directly to land owners. He goes on to table laws in parliament

Pikaz profil fotoğrafı

Pikaz1 yıl önce

All the previous bravado was just a smokescreen. EFF cannot lead a revolution

Mbuso P Siera profil fotoğrafı

Mbuso P Siera1 yıl önce

The natives will never get their land back,have full ownership of the economy and country through voting,the political system in South Africa is owned and controlled by wealthy colonial and apartheid European families who give cash to these blacks to manage the natives for them!

QueenIndigoChild👑🇿🇦 profil fotoğrafı

QueenIndigoChild👑🇿🇦1 yıl önce

Julius has always been about managing SAns particularly the youth. He has done exactly what he speaks of by opening a trust for his children and making sure that his family is taken care of. He saw the political space as an opportunity for a better life.

Umtshabalalisi profil fotoğrafı

Umtshabalalisi1 yıl önce

Isn't the EFF the one's who are trying to take away a native King's land under Expropriation without compensation? I remember a native King or his representatives being against Land Expropriation without Compensation they were being targeted for their land while settlers were left unbothered

Love Joslin profil fotoğrafı

Love Joslin1 yıl önce

We know Sizwe you are a floating.

@realcelebnews profil fotoğrafı

@realcelebnews1 yıl önce

South Africa will have to do it the Zimbabwean way because it’s the only way or keep appeasement political way and it will never happen. They took it violently you have to match them the same way and be prepared to suffer. Freedom doesn’t come without suffering.

Benzer Videolar

The Empire Never Forgave Zimbabwe for Taking Back Land Zimbabwe is preparing to return 67 foreign-owned commercial farms seized during its land reform program, with the government saying the properties were protected under bilateral investment agreements. Before land reform, about 4,500 white farmers controlled most of the country’s most fertile land, a direct legacy of colonial dispossession. When Zimbabwe attempted to reverse that injustice, it was punished with sanctions, isolation, restricted access to finance, and years of Western hostility. Now, in the name of rebuilding relations with Western governments and international lenders, Zimbabwe is being pushed back into the old colonial bargain: return the land, compensate former settlers, reassure investors, and call it progress. This is not reconciliation. It is a land grab under the guise of economic blackmail. For Africa, the warning is clear: sovereignty means very little if a country cannot control its land, protect its resources, and make economic decisions without being punished by the same powers that benefited from colonial theft.

The Empire Never Forgave Zimbabwe for Taking Back Land Zimbabwe is preparing to return 67 foreign-owned commercial farms seized during its land reform program, with the government saying the properties were protected under bilateral investment agreements. Before land reform, about 4,500 white farmers controlled most of the country’s most fertile land, a direct legacy of colonial dispossession. When Zimbabwe attempted to reverse that injustice, it was punished with sanctions, isolation, restricted access to finance, and years of Western hostility. Now, in the name of rebuilding relations with Western governments and international lenders, Zimbabwe is being pushed back into the old colonial bargain: return the land, compensate former settlers, reassure investors, and call it progress. This is not reconciliation. It is a land grab under the guise of economic blackmail. For Africa, the warning is clear: sovereignty means very little if a country cannot control its land, protect its resources, and make economic decisions without being punished by the same powers that benefited from colonial theft.

The Spearhead

25,714 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It’s already started … The land grab! Whose land is this really in WNC? Many think it’s just a bunch of white hillbillies who live there. Not so. This land has been lived on and stewarded by the Cherokee, Creek, Powhatan and many others for decades and decades! Is the government just going to take THIS land from them too? This has to stop. So much heritage is on those mountains and the government, if given a chance, is going to wipe it all out. Their Indian heritage will be buried along with all who died violently in the water and mud slides. 💔

It’s already started … The land grab! Whose land is this really in WNC? Many think it’s just a bunch of white hillbillies who live there. Not so. This land has been lived on and stewarded by the Cherokee, Creek, Powhatan and many others for decades and decades! Is the government just going to take THIS land from them too? This has to stop. So much heritage is on those mountains and the government, if given a chance, is going to wipe it all out. Their Indian heritage will be buried along with all who died violently in the water and mud slides. 💔

Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷

10,985 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

LAWYER DISPELS LAND EXPROPRIATION MYTHS South Africa's Land Expropriation Act, which was signed into law in early 2025 as part of efforts to provide redress for the country's historical land injustices, has generated considerable debate in recent months. The act allows the government to expropriate privately owned land for public purposes or in the public interest, with nil compensation in rare cases. Some, such as the Donald Trump-led United States governments and right-wing organisations inside South Africa, claim the law is part of what they allege to be 'persecution' of the country's white settlers. However, a closer look at the act shows that this is far from the truth. For instance, in this interview with Newzroom Afrika (@newzroomafrika5914 on YouTube), renowned South African lawyer Tembeka Ngcukaitobi (Ngcukaitobi1 on X) highlights that the act will most likely not result in any active settler-owned land taken away by the state without compensation. Ngcukaitobi explains that, despite right-wing elements portraying the act as radical, it is actually mild, as the nil compensation part will only apply to idle and abandoned land, implying that most settler farmers whose land is in active use will not be affected. This explanation aligns with arguments that have been put forward by progressive organisations such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), who say the law does not go far enough to address the land dispossession that Black South Africans were subjected to during centuries of European settler colonialism, which ramped up into apartheid between 1948 and 1994. They argue that the act will not alter the country's current land ownership structure, where white settlers own more than 72 per cent of the land according to a 2017 government land audit, despite making up only about 7 per cent of the population as per the 2022 national census. Credit: Newzroom Afrika/YouTube

LAWYER DISPELS LAND EXPROPRIATION MYTHS South Africa's Land Expropriation Act, which was signed into law in early 2025 as part of efforts to provide redress for the country's historical land injustices, has generated considerable debate in recent months. The act allows the government to expropriate privately owned land for public purposes or in the public interest, with nil compensation in rare cases. Some, such as the Donald Trump-led United States governments and right-wing organisations inside South Africa, claim the law is part of what they allege to be 'persecution' of the country's white settlers. However, a closer look at the act shows that this is far from the truth. For instance, in this interview with Newzroom Afrika (@newzroomafrika5914 on YouTube), renowned South African lawyer Tembeka Ngcukaitobi (Ngcukaitobi1 on X) highlights that the act will most likely not result in any active settler-owned land taken away by the state without compensation. Ngcukaitobi explains that, despite right-wing elements portraying the act as radical, it is actually mild, as the nil compensation part will only apply to idle and abandoned land, implying that most settler farmers whose land is in active use will not be affected. This explanation aligns with arguments that have been put forward by progressive organisations such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), who say the law does not go far enough to address the land dispossession that Black South Africans were subjected to during centuries of European settler colonialism, which ramped up into apartheid between 1948 and 1994. They argue that the act will not alter the country's current land ownership structure, where white settlers own more than 72 per cent of the land according to a 2017 government land audit, despite making up only about 7 per cent of the population as per the 2022 national census. Credit: Newzroom Afrika/YouTube

African Stream

12,776 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

SOUTH AFRICA, ZIMBABWE, AFRICA, APARTHEID, COLONIAL SEGREGATION, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND LAND REFORM Very often, when people talk about Expropriation of Land Without Compensation, or Nationalisation, etc, some people rush to the now common threat: "you will starve like Zimbabwe". To be clear, Zimbabwe's land reform was never about really giving land to Africans. Mugabe, a European puppet of note, was only caught off guard by War Veterans who had run out of patience, and he acceded only because he was on the verge of losing power. So, Zimbabwe is a bad example. Now, Chris Kunzler here makes one of the most important cases for land reform, giving Alexandra as an example, where vast tracts of land lie unused (and owned by Europeans who inherited the land from previous thieves), but the land cannot be used to resettle the crowded people of Alex. A drive around Gauteng will show that there exists these vast tracts of land around the most overpopulated townships, but the government cannot use this land because it is obscenely priced for the willing buyer and willing seller BS.

SOUTH AFRICA, ZIMBABWE, AFRICA, APARTHEID, COLONIAL SEGREGATION, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND LAND REFORM Very often, when people talk about Expropriation of Land Without Compensation, or Nationalisation, etc, some people rush to the now common threat: "you will starve like Zimbabwe". To be clear, Zimbabwe's land reform was never about really giving land to Africans. Mugabe, a European puppet of note, was only caught off guard by War Veterans who had run out of patience, and he acceded only because he was on the verge of losing power. So, Zimbabwe is a bad example. Now, Chris Kunzler here makes one of the most important cases for land reform, giving Alexandra as an example, where vast tracts of land lie unused (and owned by Europeans who inherited the land from previous thieves), but the land cannot be used to resettle the crowded people of Alex. A drive around Gauteng will show that there exists these vast tracts of land around the most overpopulated townships, but the government cannot use this land because it is obscenely priced for the willing buyer and willing seller BS.

Unathi Afrika

236,274 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

A Zionist in Kenya claim that God took him there. He acquired 550 acres of land under suspicious circumstances and plans to establish a Jews-only settlement. Kenyans are not allowed in their piece of land. South Africa has a similar problem. A Zionist acquired land in Cape Town from a pro-Zionist local government of the DA. Fortunately, we have land expropriation laws. There will be no Jewish settlements in South Africa. The world is confronted by the scourge of Zionism. We must put an end to it.

A Zionist in Kenya claim that God took him there. He acquired 550 acres of land under suspicious circumstances and plans to establish a Jews-only settlement. Kenyans are not allowed in their piece of land. South Africa has a similar problem. A Zionist acquired land in Cape Town from a pro-Zionist local government of the DA. Fortunately, we have land expropriation laws. There will be no Jewish settlements in South Africa. The world is confronted by the scourge of Zionism. We must put an end to it.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

17,445 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I think you will understand well now because it is not Julius Malema who is saying it, Whites run this country, 90% businesses in the JSE are owned by white people and 80% percent of the land in South Africa is in the hands of white people. They are in charge! You who chase away Zimbabweans saying they are immigrants, you are also an immigrant yourself because you have nothing to show that this land belongs to you, you live in a house owned by a bank, you have no title deed, you have no land of your own and you live in squatter camp yet you claim this Land belongs to you.

I think you will understand well now because it is not Julius Malema who is saying it, Whites run this country, 90% businesses in the JSE are owned by white people and 80% percent of the land in South Africa is in the hands of white people. They are in charge! You who chase away Zimbabweans saying they are immigrants, you are also an immigrant yourself because you have nothing to show that this land belongs to you, you live in a house owned by a bank, you have no title deed, you have no land of your own and you live in squatter camp yet you claim this Land belongs to you.

Andile Gogoda

101,252 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

#Hyderabad: Why are students of Hyderabad Central University protesting against the Telangana Govt? The Govt announced to auction 400 acres of land. Govt claims, the land is no forest nor home to any animals and belongs to the Govt . And Minister for IT Sridhar Babu Duddilla assured in the assembly that no land of the HCU will be touched. Students are fighting against alleged land encroachment in this process. The protesting student say( Verbatim) - "The reality is that the state government is misleading students to think that there is a distinction between University land and government land. It is well aware that the entire University is situated in the land of the state government. It was, in fact, the Congress government under Indira Gandhi that originally allocated 2,300 acres of government land for the University. The grandstanding by the minister-now conveniently celebrated by the Congress-affiliated student organization NSUl-is nothing more than a smokescreen to obscure the government's corporate appeasement and wash their hands off the responsibility to safeguard the university land’.

#Hyderabad: Why are students of Hyderabad Central University protesting against the Telangana Govt? The Govt announced to auction 400 acres of land. Govt claims, the land is no forest nor home to any animals and belongs to the Govt . And Minister for IT Sridhar Babu Duddilla assured in the assembly that no land of the HCU will be touched. Students are fighting against alleged land encroachment in this process. The protesting student say( Verbatim) - "The reality is that the state government is misleading students to think that there is a distinction between University land and government land. It is well aware that the entire University is situated in the land of the state government. It was, in fact, the Congress government under Indira Gandhi that originally allocated 2,300 acres of government land for the University. The grandstanding by the minister-now conveniently celebrated by the Congress-affiliated student organization NSUl-is nothing more than a smokescreen to obscure the government's corporate appeasement and wash their hands off the responsibility to safeguard the university land’.

@Coreena Enet Suares

45,433 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This speech by Pan Africanist scholar, Patrick Loch Otieno Lumumba shows how ZANUPF propaganda has now fell flat on its face. No sensible Zimbabwean or African was ever opposed to Land Reform, they were just opposed to violent grabs when you could simply legislate in parliament. Sensible people were opposed to land being given on partisan basis instead of giving land to those with the ability to use it. They were opposed to one family owning 21 farms and that being replicated as it has been across the ZANUPF leadership. This speech by Prof P.L.O. Lumumba shows that the world now gets it, and that grabbing land violently and dishing it to your cronies and family is not land reform. Land reform is yet to be done, when it is done properly on merit, Zimbabwe will rise again because only a competent Government can do that! A competent Government leads to a successful country!

This speech by Pan Africanist scholar, Patrick Loch Otieno Lumumba shows how ZANUPF propaganda has now fell flat on its face. No sensible Zimbabwean or African was ever opposed to Land Reform, they were just opposed to violent grabs when you could simply legislate in parliament. Sensible people were opposed to land being given on partisan basis instead of giving land to those with the ability to use it. They were opposed to one family owning 21 farms and that being replicated as it has been across the ZANUPF leadership. This speech by Prof P.L.O. Lumumba shows that the world now gets it, and that grabbing land violently and dishing it to your cronies and family is not land reform. Land reform is yet to be done, when it is done properly on merit, Zimbabwe will rise again because only a competent Government can do that! A competent Government leads to a successful country!

Hopewell Chin’ono

126,572 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Had a talk with Cde Douglas Mahiya: Secretary of War Veterans League in the Politburo. He argues that Unlike South Africa, Zimbabwe took Land same way Whites took Land from Blacks. And He is unapologetic for that He can not advise South Africa how to do it. But as long as without land people will remain impoverished

Had a talk with Cde Douglas Mahiya: Secretary of War Veterans League in the Politburo. He argues that Unlike South Africa, Zimbabwe took Land same way Whites took Land from Blacks. And He is unapologetic for that He can not advise South Africa how to do it. But as long as without land people will remain impoverished

Limukani Mathe Ph.D

30,521 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

When immigrants tell ethnic Australians OUR land is stolen, it shows their intent to lay their own claim to it & make us irrelevant. It’s not stolen land, it is developed land & WE developed it. We are not a nation of immigrants. We are the builders of the nation that you just arrived in after WE developed it with our blood, sweat & tears. Our ancestors sacrificed & died for this land. You are a GUEST in OUR nation. You benefit from us, gain opportunities because of us & all you do is insult us, exploit us, disrespect us & make demands. The tolerance has run out 🤨

When immigrants tell ethnic Australians OUR land is stolen, it shows their intent to lay their own claim to it & make us irrelevant. It’s not stolen land, it is developed land & WE developed it. We are not a nation of immigrants. We are the builders of the nation that you just arrived in after WE developed it with our blood, sweat & tears. Our ancestors sacrificed & died for this land. You are a GUEST in OUR nation. You benefit from us, gain opportunities because of us & all you do is insult us, exploit us, disrespect us & make demands. The tolerance has run out 🤨

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

45,639 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

HOW DID LAND MEANT FOR MURANG’A AND KIMBU RESIDENTS END UP IN THE HANDS OF FOREIGN INVESTORS? The land surrendered by Del Monte in Murang’a County, measuring over 7,000 acres, was meant to bring justice to the local community. When I served as Speaker of the National Assembly, Parliament made a clear resolution that this land be allocated to nearly 4,000 local beneficiaries who had waited for years for rightful settlement. That decision represented hope for many families who believed that, at last, fairness would prevail. It is therefore deeply disturbing that a portion of this land has now been allocated to investors from Bangladesh under the watch of President William Ruto, while many of the intended beneficiaries remain without land. This is unacceptable. The people of Murang’a cannot be sidelined while their land is handed to outsiders. The United Alternative Government will ensure that the will of Parliament and the rights of the local community are respected, and that land meant for the people is returned and allocated transparently and lawfully.

HOW DID LAND MEANT FOR MURANG’A AND KIMBU RESIDENTS END UP IN THE HANDS OF FOREIGN INVESTORS? The land surrendered by Del Monte in Murang’a County, measuring over 7,000 acres, was meant to bring justice to the local community. When I served as Speaker of the National Assembly, Parliament made a clear resolution that this land be allocated to nearly 4,000 local beneficiaries who had waited for years for rightful settlement. That decision represented hope for many families who believed that, at last, fairness would prevail. It is therefore deeply disturbing that a portion of this land has now been allocated to investors from Bangladesh under the watch of President William Ruto, while many of the intended beneficiaries remain without land. This is unacceptable. The people of Murang’a cannot be sidelined while their land is handed to outsiders. The United Alternative Government will ensure that the will of Parliament and the rights of the local community are respected, and that land meant for the people is returned and allocated transparently and lawfully.

Hon. Justin Muturi, EGH

36,368 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

THE PRESIDENT OF AGRISA INDIRECTLY CALLS DONALD TRUMP A LIER. AGRISA REPRESENTS 99.9% WHITE AFRIKANER FARMERS SAYS THEIR IS NO CONFISCATION OF LAND IN. SOUTH AFRICA There is no persecution of any race in South Africa. Yes we have a crime problem, which government is working on. More blacks are affected by this than any other race. It’s over 30 years the ANC government has not confiscated a single piece of land. The law is very clear, if government wants land it must be willing seller and the person will get market price. If no agreement can be reached it will go to a special court and they will determine the price of the land. The lies being spread about SA is laughable no such things are happening here. I guarantee you at least 90% of the people will return. Don’t listen to anyone but Mr Jaco Minnaar is President of AGRISA who ironically represents 99.9% white farmers, he said” their no confiscation of land in South Africa. Simple terms he called Donald trump a list.

THE PRESIDENT OF AGRISA INDIRECTLY CALLS DONALD TRUMP A LIER. AGRISA REPRESENTS 99.9% WHITE AFRIKANER FARMERS SAYS THEIR IS NO CONFISCATION OF LAND IN. SOUTH AFRICA There is no persecution of any race in South Africa. Yes we have a crime problem, which government is working on. More blacks are affected by this than any other race. It’s over 30 years the ANC government has not confiscated a single piece of land. The law is very clear, if government wants land it must be willing seller and the person will get market price. If no agreement can be reached it will go to a special court and they will determine the price of the land. The lies being spread about SA is laughable no such things are happening here. I guarantee you at least 90% of the people will return. Don’t listen to anyone but Mr Jaco Minnaar is President of AGRISA who ironically represents 99.9% white farmers, he said” their no confiscation of land in South Africa. Simple terms he called Donald trump a list.

Goolam

27,556 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

UPDATE FROM ORANIA, SOUTH-AFRICA. The ANC government in South-Africa is doubling down on land expropriation. A shocking new bill was just announced; land expropriation based on majority demographics. That means; land ownership must reflect the demographics of South-Africa. The Department of Land Reform and Rural Development announced today to the relevant parliamentary portfolio committee that the so-called "Equitable Access to Land" Bill will be introduced this year, the idea is to rush it through before the end of Neither the department nor the portfolio committee is making a secret of the fact that this bill specifically targets land ownership by white Afrikaners. They regard it as part of the freedom struggle that was left unfinished in 1994. This is another way of saying that they have decided to unilaterally suspend that settlement in yet another way. Dr Wynand Boshoff, Member of Parlement for the Freedom Front Plus, sent out a press release after the announcement of the committee. Negotiations in the 90’s between the previous government and the ANC were based on two basic foundational agreements. Afrikaners can keep land that were their property, and Afrikaners can have their own educational institutions and schools. In the past few months both these agreements fell victim to the ANC’s dishonesty. If some Afrikaners want to leave SA, I completely understand and, though saddened, wish them well. Orania however is suggesting a new dispensation. Territory for Afrikaners should be recognised. Without a dispensational change, the ANC will continue to vilify Afrikaners in order to cover up their own failures and satisfy their voter base. Recognizing a territory for Afrikaners will be stabilising for the region, in the interest of peace, and a nett positive for everyone. What we ask, we also extend to others that can maintain the same. Be solution driven. Be like Orania

UPDATE FROM ORANIA, SOUTH-AFRICA. The ANC government in South-Africa is doubling down on land expropriation. A shocking new bill was just announced; land expropriation based on majority demographics. That means; land ownership must reflect the demographics of South-Africa. The Department of Land Reform and Rural Development announced today to the relevant parliamentary portfolio committee that the so-called "Equitable Access to Land" Bill will be introduced this year, the idea is to rush it through before the end of Neither the department nor the portfolio committee is making a secret of the fact that this bill specifically targets land ownership by white Afrikaners. They regard it as part of the freedom struggle that was left unfinished in 1994. This is another way of saying that they have decided to unilaterally suspend that settlement in yet another way. Dr Wynand Boshoff, Member of Parlement for the Freedom Front Plus, sent out a press release after the announcement of the committee. Negotiations in the 90’s between the previous government and the ANC were based on two basic foundational agreements. Afrikaners can keep land that were their property, and Afrikaners can have their own educational institutions and schools. In the past few months both these agreements fell victim to the ANC’s dishonesty. If some Afrikaners want to leave SA, I completely understand and, though saddened, wish them well. Orania however is suggesting a new dispensation. Territory for Afrikaners should be recognised. Without a dispensational change, the ANC will continue to vilify Afrikaners in order to cover up their own failures and satisfy their voter base. Recognizing a territory for Afrikaners will be stabilising for the region, in the interest of peace, and a nett positive for everyone. What we ask, we also extend to others that can maintain the same. Be solution driven. Be like Orania

Joost Strydom

193,026 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

WOAH, This is a man still on the ground in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene. He’s talking to victims and they’re having their land purchased out from under them for $2,500 He says it’s definitely a land grab for the lithium and quartz mining “Buying the land wholesale everywhere. Not just Chimney Rock, not just Spruce Pine, not just where the mine is going to be. They're buying up in Burnsville, they're buying up in Waynesville, everywhere where somebody lost their entire home, the government is confiscating the land and giving them a $2,500 check.” “It's a state-wide land grab. And then the news, the local news just reported that Governor Roy, good old Democrat, Governor Roy, decided that they were going to buy up whole communities that were devastated.” This video is full of some of the most insane first hand information I’ve heard about what’s going on in North Carolina. There is so much talked about, if all this is true, it’s the crime of the century

WOAH, This is a man still on the ground in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene. He’s talking to victims and they’re having their land purchased out from under them for $2,500 He says it’s definitely a land grab for the lithium and quartz mining “Buying the land wholesale everywhere. Not just Chimney Rock, not just Spruce Pine, not just where the mine is going to be. They're buying up in Burnsville, they're buying up in Waynesville, everywhere where somebody lost their entire home, the government is confiscating the land and giving them a $2,500 check.” “It's a state-wide land grab. And then the news, the local news just reported that Governor Roy, good old Democrat, Governor Roy, decided that they were going to buy up whole communities that were devastated.” This video is full of some of the most insane first hand information I’ve heard about what’s going on in North Carolina. There is so much talked about, if all this is true, it’s the crime of the century

Wall Street Apes

1,287,971 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Another good one for Justice Sila on land titles: If you have bought or deal in land, watch 👇🏽this. It’s not the TITLE DEED that matters, it’s the ROOT OF TITLE that matters. 1.We have become so corrupt that the courts have concluded that we can no longer rely on what is at the lands registry to know who owns the land, we have to go to the root of title. 2.Basically, what is in the land registry is valid, only to the extent there is no dispute on the title. The moment there is a dispute, and there is more than one title, then the registry ceases to have conclusive meaning. We then have to dig into the root of that title. Basically go back in time and see where the title originated from, how it has changed hands overtime to its current claim. Anyone who bought fraudulent land in the process is screwed because they bought fraud not land, even if they did a search at the registry. It does even matter which land was registered first. is supposed to make sense. When fraud is so prevalent, and even originates from the very people supposed to protect us, such as land registry staff, then the law must evolve to protect the public. Root of title is going to protect the public from its corrupt self. Sometimes a mad man is restrained to avoid self harm. 4.And the Good Judge has explained that it does NOT replace the Torrens system, it clarifies Torrens in that when there are two tiles, its Torrens itself that begins to search for the root of title it had all along assumed to be conclusive. Hence there is no conflict between the Stanchart Manchester vs Dina Management cases.

Another good one for Justice Sila on land titles: If you have bought or deal in land, watch 👇🏽this. It’s not the TITLE DEED that matters, it’s the ROOT OF TITLE that matters. 1.We have become so corrupt that the courts have concluded that we can no longer rely on what is at the lands registry to know who owns the land, we have to go to the root of title. 2.Basically, what is in the land registry is valid, only to the extent there is no dispute on the title. The moment there is a dispute, and there is more than one title, then the registry ceases to have conclusive meaning. We then have to dig into the root of that title. Basically go back in time and see where the title originated from, how it has changed hands overtime to its current claim. Anyone who bought fraudulent land in the process is screwed because they bought fraud not land, even if they did a search at the registry. It does even matter which land was registered first. is supposed to make sense. When fraud is so prevalent, and even originates from the very people supposed to protect us, such as land registry staff, then the law must evolve to protect the public. Root of title is going to protect the public from its corrupt self. Sometimes a mad man is restrained to avoid self harm. 4.And the Good Judge has explained that it does NOT replace the Torrens system, it clarifies Torrens in that when there are two tiles, its Torrens itself that begins to search for the root of title it had all along assumed to be conclusive. Hence there is no conflict between the Stanchart Manchester vs Dina Management cases.

Edwin H. Dande

24,241 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Muslim clerics in Britain openly admit they are in a “ceasefire” simply waiting for the right moment. Scholars of Islamist doctrine have been warning for years: The world is divided into two houses the Land of Islam and the Land of War. Muslims are commanded to wage Jihad against non-Muslims until the entire world becomes the Land of Islam. This is not ancient history. This is being taught and believed right now, in Britain. How much longer will the West continue to ignore this ideology and pretend it’s compatible with our civilization?

Muslim clerics in Britain openly admit they are in a “ceasefire” simply waiting for the right moment. Scholars of Islamist doctrine have been warning for years: The world is divided into two houses the Land of Islam and the Land of War. Muslims are commanded to wage Jihad against non-Muslims until the entire world becomes the Land of Islam. This is not ancient history. This is being taught and believed right now, in Britain. How much longer will the West continue to ignore this ideology and pretend it’s compatible with our civilization?

Yossi BenYakar

38,611 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce