正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Here’s the ICE watch training video Cam Higby 🇺🇸 found. Let’s deconstruct the first few minutes. Lead by Eric Ward, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left NGO with nearly a billion-dollar endowment. His academic work is in “Stochastic terrorism,” which is “using hostile public... rhetoric, repeated and amplified across media and communication platforms.” Literally, his expertise is manipulating minds. He’s not an expert on peaceful protests. He’s not an operational guy. His background is in psychological warfare. Participants were told “for their safety” they must “have training,” but this training isn’t about situational awareness, first aid, or practical defense against pepper spray. It’s, in fact, teaching you how to mentally prepare to escalate violence. Let’s look at his tactic. First, a meditation session. Why? To get you “out of your brain” and in “touch with feelings.” He then explicitly tells everyone to tune out everything but their feelings. Next… the four thousand people here are being asked to confront armed federal agents. What is the natural reaction for anyone confronting armed men? Nervousness. I love the police; my father-in-law was an NYPD officer, but my heart beats faster when I’m pulled over by my local PD. He’s telling them to listen to that “heat behind the eyes, tremble in your hands,” which is fine, but then he is lying. He’s telling you to interpret that natural panic when facing authority as moral superiority and your “conscious.” Next, he has to dehumanize opponents and set the stage for “us vs. them,” but this is tricky because almost every American knows a Republican. So he says “I want to be clear who they are,” and he gets very specific so the picture of your MAGA uncle or priest doesn’t enter your mind. Then he states the obvious, which everyone (even MAGA) will agree on: “Renee Good should be alive. Alex Pretti should be alive.” I agree with that statement, but the question is who’s responsible for their deaths. IMHO, the person most responsible is Eric Ward, but of course, he’s not going to blame himself. Then he says, “The people who died at the hands of ICE snd border patrol should be alive.” What people? He doesn’t say. It’s not about the people; it’s about drawing a straight line from Renee and Alex to ICE. Then he says, “Let’s tell the truth.” Which any kindergartener knows is followed by lies, but his listeners are in a trance from the breathing exercise. Listen to the sing-song nature of how he speaks. It’s literally hypnosis. Hypnosis for the BIG whopper lie: “Federal law enforcement is not here to keep us safe.” Really, Eric? Maybe you can make an argument that some federal law enforcement isn’t here to keep us safe… but you didn’t specify. You didn’t exclude organizations like the US Coast Guard, which is federal immigration law enforcement and does keep us safe. Why? Because he needs to paint with broad strokes in case other agencies are called in. Nad now the stage is set to dehumanize: “Federal law enforcement is killing people, beating people…” And the worst lie: “Detaining people like disposable objects.” Once you are hypnotized. Once you trust your feelings over facts. Once you know those feelings make you morally superior. Once you know ICE thinks you are “disposable garbage,” then you are prepared to act with violence! Just trust your feelings and don’t look at the massive endowment the Southern Poverty Law Center has to fund physiological operatives trained in Marxist theory like Eric Ward.show more

John Ʌ Konrad V

153,851 subscribers

229,826 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This Illinois woman says she doesn’t always like the way Trump speaks or talks or the way he does things, but…. “But now, the first President to come along that said I’m not going to allow this anymore, I’m not gonna’ allow you to fill your pockets, I’m not gonna allow everyone to just run amuck, is in office. And I don’t like everything he says, and I don’t like everything he does or the way he does it, but the one thing we have to remember is he’s not a politician. He’s a business man and he’s running this country as a business to make us be the better business than all the other businesses out there, which is a good thing. You may not agree with the National Guard coming in. I do! I agree whole heartedly with the National Guard coming in because in Illinois we have a Governor and a Mayor of Chicago that think it’s okay for 50 people to be k****d in a weekend or 300 people s**t in a month. They think that’s okay. Carjackings- ‘nah, we’re not going to prosecute.z’ And the sanctuary state and the sanctuary city has bled Illinois dry. Personally, I’m over it. Whatever you have to do Trump, get ‘em in here. Get these Governors and these Mayors out that are refusing to follow Federal Law that’s been set up….you don’t get to disagree with and break the law that’s been set up, to say Illinois is a sanctuary city and you’re going to fight ICE. …You don’t have to like him (Trump), but if he’s doing what’s good for the country, you gotta’ like what he’s doing.” 100% correct ma’am. 100%. You may not like the boss but if the boss is making the country safer and better than before, you have to like the job he is doing. People are fed up. As she said, go get ‘em Mr. President. The majority that elected you, supports you.

This Illinois woman says she doesn’t always like the way Trump speaks or talks or the way he does things, but…. “But now, the first President to come along that said I’m not going to allow this anymore, I’m not gonna’ allow you to fill your pockets, I’m not gonna allow everyone to just run amuck, is in office. And I don’t like everything he says, and I don’t like everything he does or the way he does it, but the one thing we have to remember is he’s not a politician. He’s a business man and he’s running this country as a business to make us be the better business than all the other businesses out there, which is a good thing. You may not agree with the National Guard coming in. I do! I agree whole heartedly with the National Guard coming in because in Illinois we have a Governor and a Mayor of Chicago that think it’s okay for 50 people to be k**d in a weekend or 300 people st in a month. They think that’s okay. Carjackings- ‘nah, we’re not going to prosecute.z’ And the sanctuary state and the sanctuary city has bled Illinois dry. Personally, I’m over it. Whatever you have to do Trump, get ‘em in here. Get these Governors and these Mayors out that are refusing to follow Federal Law that’s been set up….you don’t get to disagree with and break the law that’s been set up, to say Illinois is a sanctuary city and you’re going to fight ICE. …You don’t have to like him (Trump), but if he’s doing what’s good for the country, you gotta’ like what he’s doing.” 100% correct ma’am. 100%. You may not like the boss but if the boss is making the country safer and better than before, you have to like the job he is doing. People are fed up. As she said, go get ‘em Mr. President. The majority that elected you, supports you.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

777,144 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨ICE agents are threatening to assault and illegally arrest U.S. citizens in Portland, Maine. In the video, a man is legally observing ICE activity in his own neighborhood. Agents walk up to his car window and ask, “Are you following us?” The man replies, “Yeah.” An agent immediately escalates and says, “What you are doing is called impeding federal law enforcement. It’s an 18 U.S.C. §111 charge. This is your first and only warning. If you continue to impede and follow us, you will be arrested.” The man then correctly responds, “Yeah, but I’m not impeding you.” Another agent jumps in and says,“You just openly admitted you were following us, so…” And again, the man correctly explains, “I am following you. I’m not impeding you. I’m observing you.” Which is a constitutionally protected right. The agent responds anyway, “It is impeding.” The man replies, “No, it’s actually not.” At that point, the agents become visibly angry that he knows the law and threaten him again, saying, “This is your one warning. If you keep doing it, we will pull you back out and arrest you.” Just to be very clear… Following and observing law enforcement, without interference, is not a crime. Threatening arrest anyway is an abuse of power. Threatening to “pull him out” of his vehicle is a threat of unlawful force. These agents are not enforcing the law, they’re misstating it, weaponizing it, and hoping intimidation will do the rest. They don’t understand the laws they claim to enforce. They just parrot a few buzzwords and statute numbers, and expect the public to fold. And when that doesn’t work, they threaten violence. Because the biggest threat to an ICE agent is someone who knows their rights.

🚨ICE agents are threatening to assault and illegally arrest U.S. citizens in Portland, Maine. In the video, a man is legally observing ICE activity in his own neighborhood. Agents walk up to his car window and ask, “Are you following us?” The man replies, “Yeah.” An agent immediately escalates and says, “What you are doing is called impeding federal law enforcement. It’s an 18 U.S.C. §111 charge. This is your first and only warning. If you continue to impede and follow us, you will be arrested.” The man then correctly responds, “Yeah, but I’m not impeding you.” Another agent jumps in and says,“You just openly admitted you were following us, so…” And again, the man correctly explains, “I am following you. I’m not impeding you. I’m observing you.” Which is a constitutionally protected right. The agent responds anyway, “It is impeding.” The man replies, “No, it’s actually not.” At that point, the agents become visibly angry that he knows the law and threaten him again, saying, “This is your one warning. If you keep doing it, we will pull you back out and arrest you.” Just to be very clear… Following and observing law enforcement, without interference, is not a crime. Threatening arrest anyway is an abuse of power. Threatening to “pull him out” of his vehicle is a threat of unlawful force. These agents are not enforcing the law, they’re misstating it, weaponizing it, and hoping intimidation will do the rest. They don’t understand the laws they claim to enforce. They just parrot a few buzzwords and statute numbers, and expect the public to fold. And when that doesn’t work, they threaten violence. Because the biggest threat to an ICE agent is someone who knows their rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,240,459 次观看 • 6 个月前

A new misinformation campaign is being spread by Democrat influencers saying ICE agents aren’t real law enforcement officers Legal experts break it down “Are ICE agents real law enforcement with real law enforcement powers? A lot of people are saying they aren't, but that's wrong: Independent of what you think of them, under the law, which is what we talk about here, ICE agents are real federal law enforcement officers. They actually complete their training at the same giant federal facilities where other agencies like the Secret Service, DEA, and Marshals train. As for the law, their authority to investigate and make arrests for immigration crimes falls under these two federal statutes, sections 1226 and 1357. But because they are sworn federal law enforcement officers, they also have broad Title 18 authority. Title 18 being the the general code of federal criminal laws in the US. And this is a big point of misunderstanding for people. A lot of people think that ICE only has authority for immigration related offenses. And while it's true that ICE's main mission is to enforce immigration related crimes, they won't be stopped on a bank robbery. For example: They still technically have the legal authority to arrest for tons of different federal crimes committed in their presence. Because they are sworn federal law enforcement. This is how we see ICE agents in the news arresting for things like obstruction and assault, even though these aren't specific immigration offenses. And because tons of people in the comments are getting this wrong, this is just an important clarification for you to know.”

A new misinformation campaign is being spread by Democrat influencers saying ICE agents aren’t real law enforcement officers Legal experts break it down “Are ICE agents real law enforcement with real law enforcement powers? A lot of people are saying they aren't, but that's wrong: Independent of what you think of them, under the law, which is what we talk about here, ICE agents are real federal law enforcement officers. They actually complete their training at the same giant federal facilities where other agencies like the Secret Service, DEA, and Marshals train. As for the law, their authority to investigate and make arrests for immigration crimes falls under these two federal statutes, sections 1226 and 1357. But because they are sworn federal law enforcement officers, they also have broad Title 18 authority. Title 18 being the the general code of federal criminal laws in the US. And this is a big point of misunderstanding for people. A lot of people think that ICE only has authority for immigration related offenses. And while it's true that ICE's main mission is to enforce immigration related crimes, they won't be stopped on a bank robbery. For example: They still technically have the legal authority to arrest for tons of different federal crimes committed in their presence. Because they are sworn federal law enforcement. This is how we see ICE agents in the news arresting for things like obstruction and assault, even though these aren't specific immigration offenses. And because tons of people in the comments are getting this wrong, this is just an important clarification for you to know.”

Wall Street Apes

33,633 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 TIM WALZ JUST LIT A MATCH IN A POWDER KEG What we just watched from Minnesota’s governor was not a normal political speech. It was a speech designed to delegitimize federal law enforcement in the eyes of the public. Walz did something extraordinarily dangerous: He told millions of people that ICE agents are not enforcing the law — they are “kidnapping,” “hunting,” and committing “organized brutality.” He compared federal officers to secret police. He accused them of racial targeting. He claimed they are abducting citizens in unmarked vans. Those are not policy disagreements. Those are criminal allegations — delivered without evidence — against armed federal officers operating in the middle of a high-tension environment. Then he went further. He told people to: • track ICE in their neighborhoods • film them • build databases on them • gather “evidence” for future prosecution That is how you turn law enforcement into targets. When you tell a population that federal agents are criminals, and then tell them to identify, track, and document those agents, you are pouring gasoline on a fire. Walz wrapped it in the language of peace — but the effect is the opposite. This is how you create chaos. This is how you invite confrontation. This is how someone gets hurt. A governor’s job is to cool a crisis — not radicalize it. And tonight, Tim Walz chose to escalate. History shows us exactly how this kind of rhetoric ends. And it never ends well.

🚨 TIM WALZ JUST LIT A MATCH IN A POWDER KEG What we just watched from Minnesota’s governor was not a normal political speech. It was a speech designed to delegitimize federal law enforcement in the eyes of the public. Walz did something extraordinarily dangerous: He told millions of people that ICE agents are not enforcing the law — they are “kidnapping,” “hunting,” and committing “organized brutality.” He compared federal officers to secret police. He accused them of racial targeting. He claimed they are abducting citizens in unmarked vans. Those are not policy disagreements. Those are criminal allegations — delivered without evidence — against armed federal officers operating in the middle of a high-tension environment. Then he went further. He told people to: • track ICE in their neighborhoods • film them • build databases on them • gather “evidence” for future prosecution That is how you turn law enforcement into targets. When you tell a population that federal agents are criminals, and then tell them to identify, track, and document those agents, you are pouring gasoline on a fire. Walz wrapped it in the language of peace — but the effect is the opposite. This is how you create chaos. This is how you invite confrontation. This is how someone gets hurt. A governor’s job is to cool a crisis — not radicalize it. And tonight, Tim Walz chose to escalate. History shows us exactly how this kind of rhetoric ends. And it never ends well.

Jim Ferguson

739,081 次观看 • 6 个月前

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 次观看 • 2 年前

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

Curtis Houck

89,471 次观看 • 6 个月前

Fiery comments from CNN's Scott Jennings on today's events in Minneapolis: "What strikes me is, first of all, it's extremely sad and unfortunate that someone died. I mean, the political fighting and disagreements aside, it's terrible. You don't want people to die in law enforcement situations or otherwise." "But it strikes me that we are undergoing an epidemic of political vigilantism right now. Why are people showing up in vehicles, in convoys, not just in Minneapolis, but all over the country in an effort to obstruct lawful federal law enforcement activities? This is not an isolated incident. We have had hundreds of car rammings against ICE agents all over the country. According to DHS, this lady in this car today, along with other vehicles, had been tracking ICE agents around. Why are people believing that they can drive their car into a federal law enforcement situation and that is an appropriate thing to do?" "I understand they don't like the fact that these agents are enforcing existing immigration law, but that's not how we change laws in this country. If you don't like law, you talk to the politicians. You don't drive your car into the middle of a building or a law enforcement situation that's being occupied by the people who are simply there to enforce the law. If I don't like how much the IRS is charging me in taxes, I don't drive my car into the Treasury Department try to run somebody over. I call my congressman." "Political vigilantism is being encouraged by Democratic officials like the lieutenant governor of Minnesota, Peggy Flanagan, who earlier this year told people to 'put your bodies on the line' and Tim Walz calling these guys gestapo all year. What do you think happens when you radicalize a base of people about this?"

Fiery comments from CNN's Scott Jennings on today's events in Minneapolis: "What strikes me is, first of all, it's extremely sad and unfortunate that someone died. I mean, the political fighting and disagreements aside, it's terrible. You don't want people to die in law enforcement situations or otherwise." "But it strikes me that we are undergoing an epidemic of political vigilantism right now. Why are people showing up in vehicles, in convoys, not just in Minneapolis, but all over the country in an effort to obstruct lawful federal law enforcement activities? This is not an isolated incident. We have had hundreds of car rammings against ICE agents all over the country. According to DHS, this lady in this car today, along with other vehicles, had been tracking ICE agents around. Why are people believing that they can drive their car into a federal law enforcement situation and that is an appropriate thing to do?" "I understand they don't like the fact that these agents are enforcing existing immigration law, but that's not how we change laws in this country. If you don't like law, you talk to the politicians. You don't drive your car into the middle of a building or a law enforcement situation that's being occupied by the people who are simply there to enforce the law. If I don't like how much the IRS is charging me in taxes, I don't drive my car into the Treasury Department try to run somebody over. I call my congressman." "Political vigilantism is being encouraged by Democratic officials like the lieutenant governor of Minnesota, Peggy Flanagan, who earlier this year told people to 'put your bodies on the line' and Tim Walz calling these guys gestapo all year. What do you think happens when you radicalize a base of people about this?"

Curtis Houck

229,971 次观看 • 6 个月前

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Overton

374,858 次观看 • 1 个月前

Meiselas: Trump is literally a parody in the most extreme sense of the creature boogeymen that MAGA created to go after Democrats. He’s quite literally all of it. He covers up the pedo ring. The cabal is in the Oval Office. He’s close to Epstein. He starts wars everywhere. He uses government to quite literally tread on people. Masked agents going through states and terrorizing people. He says that he’s not for you having permits or licenses to carry your guns. He’s against free speech in the most obvious and authoritarian sense. You literally go through everything, and he is the most extreme example of the thing that they claimed this is what he was going to do to stop those people. But it’s important to note that that’s literally the way authoritarianism works. You know, the quote about the devil’s greatest trick is making you believe he never existed. The authoritarian’s greatest trick is to convince you that the authoritarian is the person who is out there to stop the authoritarians, and that’s how they get into power. They have a sixth sense of people’s fears and desires, and they know how to prey on them because they are a predator class. And that’s exactly what Trump and this entire regime is.

Meiselas: Trump is literally a parody in the most extreme sense of the creature boogeymen that MAGA created to go after Democrats. He’s quite literally all of it. He covers up the pedo ring. The cabal is in the Oval Office. He’s close to Epstein. He starts wars everywhere. He uses government to quite literally tread on people. Masked agents going through states and terrorizing people. He says that he’s not for you having permits or licenses to carry your guns. He’s against free speech in the most obvious and authoritarian sense. You literally go through everything, and he is the most extreme example of the thing that they claimed this is what he was going to do to stop those people. But it’s important to note that that’s literally the way authoritarianism works. You know, the quote about the devil’s greatest trick is making you believe he never existed. The authoritarian’s greatest trick is to convince you that the authoritarian is the person who is out there to stop the authoritarians, and that’s how they get into power. They have a sixth sense of people’s fears and desires, and they know how to prey on them because they are a predator class. And that’s exactly what Trump and this entire regime is.

MeidasTouch

175,987 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jesus said: “I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars. I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.” - Revelation 3:9 (NIV) "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Jesus said: “I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars. I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.” - Revelation 3:9 (NIV) "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

83,276 次观看 • 5 个月前

Joe Borelli: “Are you allowed to interfere with law enforcement?… If he would've stood on the sidewalk with a sign or with a camera, he would not be dead right now. But that's not what he did. He interfered with law enforcement.” Abby Phillip: “What was it about his conduct that you think was illegal or whatever it was?” Joe Borelli: “In close proximity, in contact with a law enforcement official.” Abby Phillip: “ But is he allowed to record what law enforcement is doing?” Joe Borelli: “Yes, from a safe distance. You're not allowed to actually be—“ Abby Phillip: “Okay. So, based on the video that you saw, was he at a safe distance?” Joe Borelli: “No... and he should have complied [with law enforcement].” Correct!

Joe Borelli: “Are you allowed to interfere with law enforcement?… If he would've stood on the sidewalk with a sign or with a camera, he would not be dead right now. But that's not what he did. He interfered with law enforcement.” Abby Phillip: “What was it about his conduct that you think was illegal or whatever it was?” Joe Borelli: “In close proximity, in contact with a law enforcement official.” Abby Phillip: “ But is he allowed to record what law enforcement is doing?” Joe Borelli: “Yes, from a safe distance. You're not allowed to actually be—“ Abby Phillip: “Okay. So, based on the video that you saw, was he at a safe distance?” Joe Borelli: “No... and he should have complied [with law enforcement].” Correct!

RedWave Press

108,560 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jared Moskowitz’s message for Elon Musk: I think the time for staying in safe spaces is over. Twitter—or X—is a safe space for him. You’ve got to get out of your safe spaces. Go talk to the American people—not just on Fox, not just next to the president, and not just on X. Come to Congress and talk to the American people. He’s not afraid to do it—or at least, I don’t think he is. But if he really believes he’s right, if he really thinks he has the winning argument, then he should come here, mix it up with Democrats, and embarrass us with his information—if that’s what he thinks he can do. Come do that.

Jared Moskowitz’s message for Elon Musk: I think the time for staying in safe spaces is over. Twitter—or X—is a safe space for him. You’ve got to get out of your safe spaces. Go talk to the American people—not just on Fox, not just next to the president, and not just on X. Come to Congress and talk to the American people. He’s not afraid to do it—or at least, I don’t think he is. But if he really believes he’s right, if he really thinks he has the winning argument, then he should come here, mix it up with Democrats, and embarrass us with his information—if that’s what he thinks he can do. Come do that.

Acyn

426,881 次观看 • 1 年前

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

279,683 次观看 • 7 天前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just threatened to shoot a U.S. citizen for exercising his First Amendment right to observe and film ICE activities… and it was all caught on camera. In the video, agents come up to a man’s car after stopping in front and behind him, aggressively pounding on his window and yelling: “This is your warning… stop fucking following us. You are impeding operations.” The man says, “This is my house. I’ve got to get to my house.” The agent then tells him, “This is your warning… go home to your kids.” Which is a chilling thing to say when a U.S. citizen is literally driving through his own neighborhood… and being told he isn’t allowed to do so. Then the camera pans to the other window, where another agent stands with his gun drawn. Not holstered. Gun in hand. The man rolls down his window and calmly says, “You should go to church.” The agent replies, “You’re making bad decisions.” Bad decisions… like driving in your own neighborhood? Filming? Breathing? And then the original agent comes back to the car yelling: “You are not going to like the outcome. I guarantee that.” They’re not being vague. They’re not cautioning him. What they mean by “the outcome” is spelled out seconds later: “Go home to your children. It’s Sunday. Did you not learn from what just happened?” This is a threat. This is intimidation. This is armed government agents using lethal force as a warning against constitutional rights. They are telling the public that anyone who observes them, anyone who films them, anyone who doesn’t immediately disappear, can expect the same outcome as Renee Good. And that is exactly how we know the government does not believe that shooting was self-defense. Because you don’t use “self‑defense” as a warning to people who haven’t done anything wrong.

Jesus Freakin Congress

681,127 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now threatening to violently assault U.S. citizens for the crime of sitting in their own car, in a parking lot… Yes. Literally that. ICE agents are now claiming U.S. citizens are not allowed to be in the same parking lot as them. In the video, you can hear an agent approach a person sitting quietly in their car and announce that he is ICE, and that other ICE agents are also in the parking lot… Then the agent immediately issues what he calls his “one and only warning.” The person responds, “I was just on the phone.” The agent responds, “No. No you’re not.” The agent then escalates to a direct threat of violence, saying… “This is your one and only warning. I catch you here again, I’m yanking you out of that fucking car because you’re taking pictures on your little GoPro.” So, to be clear… a U.S. citizen is being threatened with assault not for impeding, not for interfering, not for committing any crime… …but for having a dash cam. The agent then adds, “If anything happens to our vehicles, or anybody in here, I’m coming straight for you.” Then more threats… “I will yank you out of that fucking car, and I will fucking put charges on you.” Charges for what? He never says. Because there are none. And then he admits the quiet part out loud… “I’ll put you in the fucking domestic terrorists app.” A federal agent threatening to label a U.S. citizen a “domestic terrorist” for sitting in a car while having a dash cam. And then the agent illegally orders the U.S. citizen to “get the fuck out” of the parking lot and tells him he is not allowed to return. To break that all down… an ICE agent used intimidation, retaliation, and threats of violence against a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, and existing in a public space. And then banned the U.S. citizen from returning to the public space. So, just to be absolutely clear… The Trump administration is conditioning the public to obey masked federal agents, without questions and without rights.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now threatening to violently assault U.S. citizens for the crime of sitting in their own car, in a parking lot… Yes. Literally that. ICE agents are now claiming U.S. citizens are not allowed to be in the same parking lot as them. In the video, you can hear an agent approach a person sitting quietly in their car and announce that he is ICE, and that other ICE agents are also in the parking lot… Then the agent immediately issues what he calls his “one and only warning.” The person responds, “I was just on the phone.” The agent responds, “No. No you’re not.” The agent then escalates to a direct threat of violence, saying… “This is your one and only warning. I catch you here again, I’m yanking you out of that fucking car because you’re taking pictures on your little GoPro.” So, to be clear… a U.S. citizen is being threatened with assault not for impeding, not for interfering, not for committing any crime… …but for having a dash cam. The agent then adds, “If anything happens to our vehicles, or anybody in here, I’m coming straight for you.” Then more threats… “I will yank you out of that fucking car, and I will fucking put charges on you.” Charges for what? He never says. Because there are none. And then he admits the quiet part out loud… “I’ll put you in the fucking domestic terrorists app.” A federal agent threatening to label a U.S. citizen a “domestic terrorist” for sitting in a car while having a dash cam. And then the agent illegally orders the U.S. citizen to “get the fuck out” of the parking lot and tells him he is not allowed to return. To break that all down… an ICE agent used intimidation, retaliation, and threats of violence against a U.S. citizen for exercising their First Amendment rights, and existing in a public space. And then banned the U.S. citizen from returning to the public space. So, just to be absolutely clear… The Trump administration is conditioning the public to obey masked federal agents, without questions and without rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

860,402 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 A French man addresses the people of Gabon 🇬🇦. “Hey Gabonese, no kidding, I have nothing against you. But there, we have our President Macron who is in your country, and no kidding, look at how you applaud him! If he is over there, it’s not for nothing. It’s surely to loot you again, to loot Africa. He is not there per adventure for a little visit huh, he is there because he’s got something up his sleeve. And no kidding, now that he has been rejected pretty much everywhere in Africa, he is trying to scrap a few countries. And no kidding, when I saw how you applauded him, honestly, personally, I don’t think this President deserves to be applauded anymore. That’s my opinion! But, I would not go to applaud him. Have you seen the mess he put us in? Have you seen the mess they are preparing for us ? No kidding, if he is there, it’s not for nothing, it’s because he has an ulterior motive (he literally said an interest in the back of his head).”

🚨 A French man addresses the people of Gabon 🇬🇦. “Hey Gabonese, no kidding, I have nothing against you. But there, we have our President Macron who is in your country, and no kidding, look at how you applaud him! If he is over there, it’s not for nothing. It’s surely to loot you again, to loot Africa. He is not there per adventure for a little visit huh, he is there because he’s got something up his sleeve. And no kidding, now that he has been rejected pretty much everywhere in Africa, he is trying to scrap a few countries. And no kidding, when I saw how you applauded him, honestly, personally, I don’t think this President deserves to be applauded anymore. That’s my opinion! But, I would not go to applaud him. Have you seen the mess he put us in? Have you seen the mess they are preparing for us ? No kidding, if he is there, it’s not for nothing, it’s because he has an ulterior motive (he literally said an interest in the back of his head).”

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

190,123 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bill O’Reilly is on a WARPATH tonight and he’s taking no prisoners. You can literally feel his indignation right until the very last word. O’Reilly is not only calling out Walz and Frey for REFUSING to protect ICE in Minnesota, but also demanding why the FBI and Kash Patel haven’t prosecuted them for insurrection. O’REILLY: “Where are they? Where is Kash Patel?!” “You can debate video tape all day long. You can say whatever you want to say, but there has to be an overriding authority in this state and there isn’t.” “Did you see Leland — because you’ve been studying it like I have — one Minneapolis police officer protecting ICE against the demonstrators? Did you see ONE?” VITTERT: “No, but that’s not the FBI’s job to investigate…” O’REILLY: “No. The answer is no. You didn’t see one because there wasn’t one there. And this is a public SAFETY issue with dead people.” “No local or state cops. NONE! By order of the governor and the mayor. That is INSANE!” VITTERT: “That may be insane Bill, but you want Kash Patel to investigate the governor because he didn’t order the police to protect ICE?” O’REILLY: “You bet I do! — If the FBI comes in and finds that the agents, the federal agents, one ICE, one Border Patrol, were derelict in their duties or used malice, I want those people indicted. Clear? Are we clear?” “But on the same token, you’ve got elected officials that could be charged with rebellion and insurrection under the U.S. Code 2383.” “This is a rebellion. That is why the people are dead.” “Nobody brings a gun, a loaded gun — NOBODY, CNN — to a confrontation with federal agents who are under siege. No one does that.” “That man did because, in my opinion, he was so crazed by this situation, so agitated as I am right now, that he lost ALL judgment.” “Now listen to me. The authorities — governor, mayor, feds — have to control that. The controlling bureau is the FBI, not Homeland Security.”

Bill O’Reilly is on a WARPATH tonight and he’s taking no prisoners. You can literally feel his indignation right until the very last word. O’Reilly is not only calling out Walz and Frey for REFUSING to protect ICE in Minnesota, but also demanding why the FBI and Kash Patel haven’t prosecuted them for insurrection. O’REILLY: “Where are they? Where is Kash Patel?!” “You can debate video tape all day long. You can say whatever you want to say, but there has to be an overriding authority in this state and there isn’t.” “Did you see Leland — because you’ve been studying it like I have — one Minneapolis police officer protecting ICE against the demonstrators? Did you see ONE?” VITTERT: “No, but that’s not the FBI’s job to investigate…” O’REILLY: “No. The answer is no. You didn’t see one because there wasn’t one there. And this is a public SAFETY issue with dead people.” “No local or state cops. NONE! By order of the governor and the mayor. That is INSANE!” VITTERT: “That may be insane Bill, but you want Kash Patel to investigate the governor because he didn’t order the police to protect ICE?” O’REILLY: “You bet I do! — If the FBI comes in and finds that the agents, the federal agents, one ICE, one Border Patrol, were derelict in their duties or used malice, I want those people indicted. Clear? Are we clear?” “But on the same token, you’ve got elected officials that could be charged with rebellion and insurrection under the U.S. Code 2383.” “This is a rebellion. That is why the people are dead.” “Nobody brings a gun, a loaded gun — NOBODY, CNN — to a confrontation with federal agents who are under siege. No one does that.” “That man did because, in my opinion, he was so crazed by this situation, so agitated as I am right now, that he lost ALL judgment.” “Now listen to me. The authorities — governor, mayor, feds — have to control that. The controlling bureau is the FBI, not Homeland Security.”

Overton

276,052 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Eric Swalwell is a sitting Congressman running for governor, and he just threatened federal law enforcement on camera. He bragged he could strip ICE agents’ licenses so they “can’t get to work,” then sneered: “Good luck walking, assholes.” This isn’t journalism. This isn’t leadership. This is a politician weaponizing government power against the very people tasked with enforcing the law. If a Republican said this about FBI or ATF agents, the media would be screaming “fascism” nonstop….BUT Because it’s ICE… it’s shrugged off. Swalwell is NOT fit for office. He’s a traitor and contempt in a suit. And he’s running for governor…. Your tax dollars are funding this coward POS.

🚨BREAKING: Eric Swalwell is a sitting Congressman running for governor, and he just threatened federal law enforcement on camera. He bragged he could strip ICE agents’ licenses so they “can’t get to work,” then sneered: “Good luck walking, assholes.” This isn’t journalism. This isn’t leadership. This is a politician weaponizing government power against the very people tasked with enforcing the law. If a Republican said this about FBI or ATF agents, the media would be screaming “fascism” nonstop….BUT Because it’s ICE… it’s shrugged off. Swalwell is NOT fit for office. He’s a traitor and contempt in a suit. And he’s running for governor…. Your tax dollars are funding this coward POS.

Bethany O’Leary 🇺🇸 🦅

75,483 次观看 • 6 个月前

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 次观看 • 17 天前