Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Here's what Dr. Eric Davis said about materials from UAP crash retrieval operations: "It's the way it's fabricated [that] makes it exotic... the materials are in the periodic table...but it's nothing we could reproduce."

59,871 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля Tio Red Octo 🐙 W. κρυπτός 𒀭𒀀𒉣𒈾 🜃Φ🌹🇵🇸𓂀 🪬
Tio Red Octo 🐙 W. κρυπτός 𒀭𒀀𒉣𒈾 🜃Φ🌹🇵🇸𓂀 🪬1 год назад

Nitinol

Фото профиля The Daily Muck
The Daily Muck1 год назад

California’s “paper” wetland restorations? One small island, a vanished Delta Smelt, and a $39M fine expose what might be the biggest eco-cover-up in the Bay-Delta.

Фото профиля John Furgerson III
John Furgerson III1 год назад

I bet we can't reproduce it. We're talking about technology from beings who seem to have intergalactic space travel down to a T.

Фото профиля Christopher
Christopher1 год назад

Metamaterials .:

Фото профиля Karen Roberts
Karen Roberts1 год назад

@Akam1129 Maybe you could ask Bob!

Фото профиля Pretrender
Pretrender1 год назад

We need to see it

Фото профиля Hotbox
Hotbox1 год назад

We've been reproducing it for 75 yrs.

Фото профиля Doug Douglas
Doug Douglas1 год назад

More bismuth nonsense. The same stories are being circulated.

Фото профиля Hugo Mena
Hugo Mena1 год назад

This is a critical topic! Long time been waiting for information on this! Unfortunately, the video's audio quality is poor. Not all elements of the periodic table are natural. The periodic table contains 118 elements, but only 90 are naturally occurring, meaning they are found in nature. The rest are synthetic elements, artificially created by humans. The last sentence you stated above is crucial and intriguing: "but it's nothing we could reproduce." This implies that UFOs cannot be reverse-engineered! I could not find such a sentence in the audio. I would very much appreciate it if you could clarify where in the audio such a sentence appears.

Похожие видео

Holy sh*t! 💩 🔥 🚨 BREAKING! 🔥 "I fully believe and know that there is a crash retrieval program." ~Congressman Eric Burlison (If I wanted to engagement farm and take advantage of you, that's how I'd do it. But you can trust me to NOT do that. Here's the full quote: "I fully believe and know that there is a crash retrieval program, often retrieving our own materials, our test materials, or our adversaries' materials." ~EB (I wouldn't be surprised to see other accounts use that incomplete quote to suck you in. And I'm not referring to any specific account bc I haven't looked to see what others have posted yet. Please support people who don't use you for clicks and $$$.) More transcript... Peter Skafish - Peter Skafish: "How confident are you, at this point, with the claims that you've received in the House, under testimony, that a component of the U.S. government is in possession of retrieved UAP vehicles, and also that there's a reverse engineering program?" (I love that Skafish made sure to ask about "vehicles" bc, IMO, if it's "just" anomalous materials, it won't excite the masses. I'm not saying that anomalous materials (and the testing of them) aren't important, but there's a chasm between materials and craft.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, I fully believe that... I mean, I fully believe that there is a crash retrieval program. I'm confident that that exists. The question is: What are they retrieving? And are the stories of jakebarber and others true that, occasionally, they will retrieve something that's not that's non-human intelligence, or that's created by someone outside of Earth? So, that's yet to be proven to me. But I fully believe and know that there is a crash retrieval program, often retrieving our own materials, our test materials, or our adversaries' materials." (Well, we ALL believe that last part and it's really not a secret. As far as if we have craft of unknown origin in our possession? That hasn't been proven to me, either. Skepticism is valid. Just don't be a pseudo-debunking-azzhole troll about it. We all know that if that stuff exists, it's going to take an act of God to allow us to see it with our own eyes.) Skafish: "And what would you say to witnesses who are considering talking to your committee, talking to you as an individual person in Congress, and also doing public testimony in hearings? I mean, what kind of assurances is the committee able to offer them in terms of protecting their livelihood, their careers, ensuring that retaliation doesn't happen?" Burlison: "You know, I mean, sadly, there's not much that we can do. And that's why we need to pass Rep. Tim Burchett's bill and...or maybe other...more language to put in the law that gives us the ability to protect people that do come forward. I think that that's a lacking...it's clearly an issue that we need to address." (There's not much we can, currently, do to protect whistleblowers. And THAT is why it's so difficult to get people to come forward. If you were confused about that before, you shouldn't be now.)

Joe Murgia

55,738 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад