Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨✈️ Here's what I found after I submitted an FOI Request about Geoengineering in the UK Main takeaways: - £152,046 from the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme, funded by various UK government departments. - The Met Office received $200,000 from an NGO called SilverLining which has links to...

Lewis_Brackpool's profile picture

Lewis Brackpool

106,497 subscribers

346,591 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieGesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Lewis Brackpool
Lewis Brackpoolvor 2 Jahren

Watch this in full with sources in the description on YouTube below 👇

Profilbild von Lewis Brackpool
Lewis Brackpoolvor 2 Jahren

If you prefer Rumble, it’s available below with sources in the description. 👇🏻

Profilbild von James Melville 🚜
James Melville 🚜vor 2 Jahren

Good journalism Lewis.

Profilbild von TeacherTwitting 🧬🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 💙
TeacherTwitting 🧬🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 💙vor 2 Jahren

This

Profilbild von Daniel Prince
Daniel Princevor 2 Jahren

Oh, look.

Profilbild von DignityWorks 💜
DignityWorks 💜vor 2 Jahren

Have you submitted FOI to airlines like BA as they are carrying some of it out

Profilbild von Lewis Brackpool
Lewis Brackpoolvor 2 Jahren

I submitted the same comprehensive request to the CAA — they claimed to have no information held.

Profilbild von Hayden
Haydenvor 2 Jahren

The Met Office changes it's weather maps to push the fear-mongering agenda:

Profilbild von Herbthefox
Herbthefoxvor 2 Jahren

Here's what I found by emailing my MP

Ähnliche Videos

🚨✈️ ANNOUNCEMENT: I plan on uncovering more information about Geoengineering projects in the United Kingdom. After shedding light on the story about the experimental Geoengineering project being kept secret from the public in San Francisco until its launch to avoid public backlash, many have reached out to me and expressed concerns that the UK is also taking part in these projects. I have fired off to 7 governmental departments Freedom of information requests asking for detailed information on… - Funding - Public awareness and consent - Involvement of airliners - Oversight by independent bodies - Research projects and publications - International collaborations, - Risk assessment and mitigation - Stakeholder engagement - Policy development and regulation. I will be providing updates to social media as the information begins to unravel.
5:41

🚨✈️ ANNOUNCEMENT: I plan on uncovering more information about Geoengineering projects in the United Kingdom. After shedding light on the story about the experimental Geoengineering project being kept secret from the public in San Francisco until its launch to avoid public backlash, many have reached out to me and expressed concerns that the UK is also taking part in these projects. I have fired off to 7 governmental departments Freedom of information requests asking for detailed information on… - Funding - Public awareness and consent - Involvement of airliners - Oversight by independent bodies - Research projects and publications - International collaborations, - Risk assessment and mitigation - Stakeholder engagement - Policy development and regulation. I will be providing updates to social media as the information begins to unravel.

Lewis Brackpool

256,854 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.
0:57

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Electroverse

40,137 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I joined this Texas Clear Sky Movement because I need to learn a lot more facts about what is going on and what effects whatever is going on is having on Texas. I post this hearing of Texas House State Representative Wes Virdell, TX State Rep 's on his HB 1382 which started out as a bill to eliminate weather modification and changed into one to stop geoengineering spraying in Texas. In this hearing, I, and I think the Texas House members on the panel learned a lot about the issue. My summary of the hearing is that we learned that there are two different programs/activities going on. One is rain enhancement and to a slight extent, hail size reduction activities going on in Texas that is regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR). The rain enhancement activities carried out by the state spray silver iodide into developing thunderclouds in the troposphere (between 5000 and 10,000 feet) in the air with the objective of increasing the rain produced in the clouds. There are 5 or 6 companies/entities licensed to do this in Texas. One representative in the hearing said that his brother living in Oklahoma is noted that rain enhancement into a developing cell in Texas eventually developed into a tornadic system that hit his house with a tornado. He saw the correlation and presumed that the Texas cloud seeding created the tornado that hit his house. The science expert for TDLR did not agree that cloud seeding causes tornadoes. He said it is designed to create more rain. The other activity going on is the stratospheric (several miles high) spaying of aluminum compounds (and maybe barium and strontium based compounds) in the grid patterns. This is called geoengineering. A representative of one of the rain enhancement companies said that this was being done with the objective of reducing global warming by creating a haze that reflects sunlight away from the earth. I am still unclear who is doing the geoengineering spraying. Is it the federal government as the rain enhancement rep said? Or is it privately funded? I have seen a video elsewhere of a former CIA director admitting it is being done. But if it is the feds, what federal entity is doing it? How much fed money is going to do it? When was it authorized, and for what purpose? After TDLR and the entities doing the cloud seeding in Texas (some of whom testified) visited Rep Virdell to tell him about the difference between weather mod/rain enhancement and geoengineering, claiming positive and benign effects of weather modification, Virdell changed his bill to target geoengineering being done instead of any regulated or funded by the state of Texas. The bill by Virdell had the votes to get out of committee and to the House floor, but Chair Dade Phelan (the former speaker of the Texas House and the chair of the committee in the video) refused to hold a vote, so the bill died. BTW, Kerrville is in Wes Virdell's district, and he has been out doing what he can to help in the response to the devastation of the flooding in his district. Note also that the testimony from citizens was primarily targeted at the health and environmental risks associated with spaying heavy metals and silver iodide over Texas. One of the rain production proponents claimed he has never seen a study that says that silver iodide for rain seeding is not safe. But I think I heard one of the witnesses saying that there are studies that are. But, boy, I still have a lot of questions. 1) How do we know that the Texas regulated rain enhancement program is not causing these freak rainstorms? I want to see a lot more science on this. I even think that the question about the enhancement of tornadic activity by cloud seeding that was asked has not been answered to my satisfaction. And I would VERY MUCH like to know if there was any cloud seeding activity that correlates with this most recent flooding episode. 2) Who is doing the geoengineering over Texas? How was it authorized? What chemicals are they using? What health and environmental studies have been done on whatever they are spaying? 3) What studies have been done on the impacts on weather (and rain production and tornadic impact) from the geoengineering going on that takes into account the combination of BOTH Texas weather mod activity AND geoengineering spraying? (This is kind of like asking whether there have ever been any safety studies on the combination of all the vaccines being recommended for children, nowadays. It is possible that one activity by itself does not do any harm, but a combination of multiple factors does.) I argued in the hearing that we need a stop to all of this until the people of Texas have had time to have input into what is being sprayed on them and what the health, environmental, and weather impacts are on them using unbiased, special-interest free studies. I still believe that. I hope that by reading info provided in this group, I will get a lot more answers to these questions. Thanks for letting me join.
45:25

I joined this Texas Clear Sky Movement because I need to learn a lot more facts about what is going on and what effects whatever is going on is having on Texas. I post this hearing of Texas House State Representative Wes Virdell, TX State Rep 's on his HB 1382 which started out as a bill to eliminate weather modification and changed into one to stop geoengineering spraying in Texas. In this hearing, I, and I think the Texas House members on the panel learned a lot about the issue. My summary of the hearing is that we learned that there are two different programs/activities going on. One is rain enhancement and to a slight extent, hail size reduction activities going on in Texas that is regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR). The rain enhancement activities carried out by the state spray silver iodide into developing thunderclouds in the troposphere (between 5000 and 10,000 feet) in the air with the objective of increasing the rain produced in the clouds. There are 5 or 6 companies/entities licensed to do this in Texas. One representative in the hearing said that his brother living in Oklahoma is noted that rain enhancement into a developing cell in Texas eventually developed into a tornadic system that hit his house with a tornado. He saw the correlation and presumed that the Texas cloud seeding created the tornado that hit his house. The science expert for TDLR did not agree that cloud seeding causes tornadoes. He said it is designed to create more rain. The other activity going on is the stratospheric (several miles high) spaying of aluminum compounds (and maybe barium and strontium based compounds) in the grid patterns. This is called geoengineering. A representative of one of the rain enhancement companies said that this was being done with the objective of reducing global warming by creating a haze that reflects sunlight away from the earth. I am still unclear who is doing the geoengineering spraying. Is it the federal government as the rain enhancement rep said? Or is it privately funded? I have seen a video elsewhere of a former CIA director admitting it is being done. But if it is the feds, what federal entity is doing it? How much fed money is going to do it? When was it authorized, and for what purpose? After TDLR and the entities doing the cloud seeding in Texas (some of whom testified) visited Rep Virdell to tell him about the difference between weather mod/rain enhancement and geoengineering, claiming positive and benign effects of weather modification, Virdell changed his bill to target geoengineering being done instead of any regulated or funded by the state of Texas. The bill by Virdell had the votes to get out of committee and to the House floor, but Chair Dade Phelan (the former speaker of the Texas House and the chair of the committee in the video) refused to hold a vote, so the bill died. BTW, Kerrville is in Wes Virdell's district, and he has been out doing what he can to help in the response to the devastation of the flooding in his district. Note also that the testimony from citizens was primarily targeted at the health and environmental risks associated with spaying heavy metals and silver iodide over Texas. One of the rain production proponents claimed he has never seen a study that says that silver iodide for rain seeding is not safe. But I think I heard one of the witnesses saying that there are studies that are. But, boy, I still have a lot of questions. 1) How do we know that the Texas regulated rain enhancement program is not causing these freak rainstorms? I want to see a lot more science on this. I even think that the question about the enhancement of tornadic activity by cloud seeding that was asked has not been answered to my satisfaction. And I would VERY MUCH like to know if there was any cloud seeding activity that correlates with this most recent flooding episode. 2) Who is doing the geoengineering over Texas? How was it authorized? What chemicals are they using? What health and environmental studies have been done on whatever they are spaying? 3) What studies have been done on the impacts on weather (and rain production and tornadic impact) from the geoengineering going on that takes into account the combination of BOTH Texas weather mod activity AND geoengineering spraying? (This is kind of like asking whether there have ever been any safety studies on the combination of all the vaccines being recommended for children, nowadays. It is possible that one activity by itself does not do any harm, but a combination of multiple factors does.) I argued in the hearing that we need a stop to all of this until the people of Texas have had time to have input into what is being sprayed on them and what the health, environmental, and weather impacts are on them using unbiased, special-interest free studies. I still believe that. I hope that by reading info provided in this group, I will get a lot more answers to these questions. Thanks for letting me join.

Tom Glass

114,959 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What's the weather like where you are? It's grey and murky here but at least in the UK they've given up any pretence that they are not engineering our weather. Legacy media came out in lockstep this week to tell us the UK Govt is funding geoengineering experiments. We know, and so does MSM - they just chose to deny it for decades. So, seeing as #chemtrails is trending...here's the full conversation I had at Christmas with Matt Landman, director of the documentary, 'FrankenSkies'. Matt will be in the UK on June 21, 2025 speaking at a geoengineering event in London. As will I. More details to follow. #LookUp #GeoEngineering
31:48

What's the weather like where you are? It's grey and murky here but at least in the UK they've given up any pretence that they are not engineering our weather. Legacy media came out in lockstep this week to tell us the UK Govt is funding geoengineering experiments. We know, and so does MSM - they just chose to deny it for decades. So, seeing as #chemtrails is trending...here's the full conversation I had at Christmas with Matt Landman, director of the documentary, 'FrankenSkies'. Matt will be in the UK on June 21, 2025 speaking at a geoengineering event in London. As will I. More details to follow. #LookUp #GeoEngineering

Sonia Poulton

13,498 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

IN CASE SOMEONE YOU KNOW THOUGHT CHEMTRAILS WERE A CONSPIRACY THEORY, SHOW THEM THIS: From X Whiplash347 🚨 RED ALERT: EPA Chief LEE ZELDIN Confirms Stratospheric CHEMICAL SPRAYING — “Sulfur Dioxide Into the Sky, Health Risks Are Real” (What used to be called “conspiracy” is now called official policy.) 💥 EPA Chief Lee Zeldin confirms that dangerous chemicals, including sulfur dioxide, are being released into the sky for geoengineering. Health risks are real. Environmental damage is guaranteed. This is no longer conspiracy — it’s official. Geoengineering Gone Rogue: The U.S. Government Has Funded It. The Skies Are Full of It. And Now the Truth Is Official. 🚨 THE CONFESSION THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO HEAR
0:16

IN CASE SOMEONE YOU KNOW THOUGHT CHEMTRAILS WERE A CONSPIRACY THEORY, SHOW THEM THIS: From X Whiplash347 🚨 RED ALERT: EPA Chief LEE ZELDIN Confirms Stratospheric CHEMICAL SPRAYING — “Sulfur Dioxide Into the Sky, Health Risks Are Real” (What used to be called “conspiracy” is now called official policy.) 💥 EPA Chief Lee Zeldin confirms that dangerous chemicals, including sulfur dioxide, are being released into the sky for geoengineering. Health risks are real. Environmental damage is guaranteed. This is no longer conspiracy — it’s official. Geoengineering Gone Rogue: The U.S. Government Has Funded It. The Skies Are Full of It. And Now the Truth Is Official. 🚨 THE CONFESSION THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO HEAR

Paul White Gold Eagle

29,588 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

More has come out about Penelope Endersby—the Chief Executive of the Met Office: For those unfamiliar, the Met Office is a government executive agency and trading fund responsible for recording and predicting weather and climate conditions across the UK. Its data is routinely used by the media and government to shape headlines, steer public perception, and justify policy. It’s central to the entire climate narrative. It has just been discovered, after facing mounting accusations of data manipulation, that Endersby’s team has quietly deleted large portions of their objectively inaccurate datasets—without so much as a small announcement. The latest example is Lowestoft. The Met Office had insisted its temperature records for the area were reliable, based on data from four nearby monitoring stations. It all sounded fine, that is, until journalist Ray Sanders found all four stations had been closed for some time. In short, they didn't exist. But rather than issue a correction or explanation, the Met Office has simply scrubbed the data. Even more enraging... When Sanders previously submitted an FOI request simply asking for the names of certain stations, the Met Office rejected it, calling the request “vexatious”. That’s a publicly funded body—receiving tens of millions a year—blocking a simple question from a member of the public because they decided it was designed to cause “annoyance”. Endersby might as well be the poster girl of the murky, negligent, and outright arrogant quango complex we constantly find ourselves battling against. We can't get these folks out quick enough.
0:22

More has come out about Penelope Endersby—the Chief Executive of the Met Office: For those unfamiliar, the Met Office is a government executive agency and trading fund responsible for recording and predicting weather and climate conditions across the UK. Its data is routinely used by the media and government to shape headlines, steer public perception, and justify policy. It’s central to the entire climate narrative. It has just been discovered, after facing mounting accusations of data manipulation, that Endersby’s team has quietly deleted large portions of their objectively inaccurate datasets—without so much as a small announcement. The latest example is Lowestoft. The Met Office had insisted its temperature records for the area were reliable, based on data from four nearby monitoring stations. It all sounded fine, that is, until journalist Ray Sanders found all four stations had been closed for some time. In short, they didn't exist. But rather than issue a correction or explanation, the Met Office has simply scrubbed the data. Even more enraging... When Sanders previously submitted an FOI request simply asking for the names of certain stations, the Met Office rejected it, calling the request “vexatious”. That’s a publicly funded body—receiving tens of millions a year—blocking a simple question from a member of the public because they decided it was designed to cause “annoyance”. Endersby might as well be the poster girl of the murky, negligent, and outright arrogant quango complex we constantly find ourselves battling against. We can't get these folks out quick enough.

The Stark Naked Brief.

149,753 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Conspiracy no more: Nicole Shanahan says that Robert Kennedy JR's HHS is putting together a team to investigate chemtrails. She says that the Overton window has blown wide open on the geoengineering of weather and that this is the beginning of the global conversation on this topic as people come forward with more evidence. The Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum have both been involved in pushing for this but then they have called anyone who wants to know exactly what they are doing a conspiracy theorist just as they did with the Covid Vaccines. Why? "It appears that the Overton window has been blown wide open on the issue of geoengineering atmospheric weather modification… And I do know that HHS is in the process of putting together a team to investigate this. We do know that cloud seeding does exist. We do know that counties throughout the United States have active contracts with private companies to cloud seed and thus bring greater moisture to arid lands and this is all done under the umbrella of climate change mitigation… I think it reminds all of us of the statement around the MRNA vaccines being safe and effective. Don't look under the hood. Don't listen to these conspiratorial voices…And in fact there is quite a bit of active censorship or medium manipulation that really deters individuals from furthering their inquiries and curiosity as to what's actually at play. And you know I think that that playbook of really using these derogatory attacks on qualified inquiries to shut them up I mean that reminds us all of what felt like during those COVID lockdowns… And so there's a lot of parallels to be drawn between the COVID-19 era and what's happening today which is this Overton window being long wide open on the issue of geoengineering people coming forward with evidence that is raising concern real red flags about the contents of what is being used for weather modification the lack of regulatory oversight the lack of closure to the public...the lack of public consent… I think this is the beginning of this global conversation. I do know the Gates Foundation is involved in geoengineering. I do know Open Philanthropy is involved in geoengineering. I know that the World Economic Forum has pushed it and several universities are pushing for it. We deserve as the people a full disclosure of the process..." Nicole Shanahan
4:33

Conspiracy no more: Nicole Shanahan says that Robert Kennedy JR's HHS is putting together a team to investigate chemtrails. She says that the Overton window has blown wide open on the geoengineering of weather and that this is the beginning of the global conversation on this topic as people come forward with more evidence. The Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum have both been involved in pushing for this but then they have called anyone who wants to know exactly what they are doing a conspiracy theorist just as they did with the Covid Vaccines. Why? "It appears that the Overton window has been blown wide open on the issue of geoengineering atmospheric weather modification… And I do know that HHS is in the process of putting together a team to investigate this. We do know that cloud seeding does exist. We do know that counties throughout the United States have active contracts with private companies to cloud seed and thus bring greater moisture to arid lands and this is all done under the umbrella of climate change mitigation… I think it reminds all of us of the statement around the MRNA vaccines being safe and effective. Don't look under the hood. Don't listen to these conspiratorial voices…And in fact there is quite a bit of active censorship or medium manipulation that really deters individuals from furthering their inquiries and curiosity as to what's actually at play. And you know I think that that playbook of really using these derogatory attacks on qualified inquiries to shut them up I mean that reminds us all of what felt like during those COVID lockdowns… And so there's a lot of parallels to be drawn between the COVID-19 era and what's happening today which is this Overton window being long wide open on the issue of geoengineering people coming forward with evidence that is raising concern real red flags about the contents of what is being used for weather modification the lack of regulatory oversight the lack of closure to the public...the lack of public consent… I think this is the beginning of this global conversation. I do know the Gates Foundation is involved in geoengineering. I do know Open Philanthropy is involved in geoengineering. I know that the World Economic Forum has pushed it and several universities are pushing for it. We deserve as the people a full disclosure of the process..." Nicole Shanahan

Green Lives Matter

268,978 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

But here’s where it gets truly disturbing. Lemov revealed that when the experiment finally came to light, the backlash was swift—and in some cases, tragic. “But, so this is why there was an ethical debate when the experiment was published in 2014,” she said. One user, Lemov recalled, had a chilling reaction. “And on the Facebook page of the research group that that did the experiment, at least one user wrote in saying, could I ever find out if I was in that experiment.” “Because I was in the emergency room at that time with, you know, threatening to commit suicide, and I want to know if my feed was altered and maybe that pushed me over, you know, into that that state.” There was no way to know. “Of course, they could never know and it can’t be traced backwards. And other people had a similar response.” The scandal sparked an investigation by the British government, which considered sanctions over the international scope of the experiment. “And there was even an investigation by the British government about whether this should be sanctioned because it affected users internationally,” Lemov said. But in the end, there was no accountability. “Ultimately, there doesn’t seem to have been any sanctions that came out of in anyone associated with it, is mostly promoted.” No one punished. No warnings given. And we’re all left wondering: how many more experiments are happening right now—hidden in plain sight?
1:09

But here’s where it gets truly disturbing. Lemov revealed that when the experiment finally came to light, the backlash was swift—and in some cases, tragic. “But, so this is why there was an ethical debate when the experiment was published in 2014,” she said. One user, Lemov recalled, had a chilling reaction. “And on the Facebook page of the research group that that did the experiment, at least one user wrote in saying, could I ever find out if I was in that experiment.” “Because I was in the emergency room at that time with, you know, threatening to commit suicide, and I want to know if my feed was altered and maybe that pushed me over, you know, into that that state.” There was no way to know. “Of course, they could never know and it can’t be traced backwards. And other people had a similar response.” The scandal sparked an investigation by the British government, which considered sanctions over the international scope of the experiment. “And there was even an investigation by the British government about whether this should be sanctioned because it affected users internationally,” Lemov said. But in the end, there was no accountability. “Ultimately, there doesn’t seem to have been any sanctions that came out of in anyone associated with it, is mostly promoted.” No one punished. No warnings given. And we’re all left wondering: how many more experiments are happening right now—hidden in plain sight?

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

409,972 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: "What we saw was a large amount of money being sent to non-governmental organizations, this by the way is one of the biggest sources of fraud in the world is government-funded, non-governmental organizations. This is a gigantic fraud loophole where the government can give money to an NGO and then there are no controls over that NGO"
4:14

Elon Musk: "What we saw was a large amount of money being sent to non-governmental organizations, this by the way is one of the biggest sources of fraud in the world is government-funded, non-governmental organizations. This is a gigantic fraud loophole where the government can give money to an NGO and then there are no controls over that NGO"

America

376,386 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 EXPOSING SUN BLOCKING ON THE LONDON UNDERGROUND 🚨 This is real grassroots campaigning, taking it to the tubes and speaking directly to the public about chemtrails, geoengineering, and government-led sun-blocking initiatives. For years, we were called conspiracy theorists for raising the alarm on this issue. But now, the government is openly investing in these technologies and implementing them. What was once dismissed as nonsense is now in the mainstream. We must resist this at all costs, and the first step is informing the public about what we now know to be complete fact - THAT GEOENGINEERING IS REAL. The tide is turning. More people than ever were willing to stop, listen, and engage. I’ve never seen anything like it. Geoengineering is a deeply dangerous intervention with zero democratic discussion. It’s disgusting, and it must be stopped. We are the people & we hold the power 👊🏻🔥 #Geoengineering #Chemtrails
1:23

🚨 EXPOSING SUN BLOCKING ON THE LONDON UNDERGROUND 🚨 This is real grassroots campaigning, taking it to the tubes and speaking directly to the public about chemtrails, geoengineering, and government-led sun-blocking initiatives. For years, we were called conspiracy theorists for raising the alarm on this issue. But now, the government is openly investing in these technologies and implementing them. What was once dismissed as nonsense is now in the mainstream. We must resist this at all costs, and the first step is informing the public about what we now know to be complete fact - THAT GEOENGINEERING IS REAL. The tide is turning. More people than ever were willing to stop, listen, and engage. I’ve never seen anything like it. Geoengineering is a deeply dangerous intervention with zero democratic discussion. It’s disgusting, and it must be stopped. We are the people & we hold the power 👊🏻🔥 #Geoengineering #Chemtrails

Montgomery Toms

173,781 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The EPA has launched a probe into a California geoengineering company releasing SULFUR DIOXIDE into the atmosphere, thanks to relentless pressure from ICAN and its supporters. This is a major victory, but the fight to stop geoengineering continues. Here’s why this matters. ICAN has long raised concerns about geoengineering—efforts to manipulate the climate by polluting the skies. From chemtrails to stratospheric aerosol injection, the risks are undeniable: toxic substances like sulfur dioxide, an EPA-regulated pollutant, are being dispersed to “block the sun.” A private company, Make Sunsets, is launching balloons to release sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, selling “cooling credits” while endangering public health. Represented by Siri & Glimstad, ICAN sent two letters to the EPA, urging regulation of this activity under the Clean Air Act. Initially ignored, ICAN persisted, and EPA’s Joseph Kaufman finally responded, acknowledging that this is geoengineering. His letter referenced a 2022 White House research plan, which the EPA helped develop, but offered little action, despite admitting sulfur dioxide’s toxicity. Undeterred, ICAN intensified its efforts, fueled by public support. This week, EPA head Lee Zeldin announced an investigation into Make Sunsets, pledging to “get to the bottom of this and take immediate action.” This is a significant step, but the broader threat looms. Scientists, backed by figures like Bill Gates, plan to “brighten clouds” and dim sunlight within weeks. As the planet enters a solar minimum with reduced sunlight, blocking the sun could disrupt climate, agriculture, and health. Globally shared stratospheres mean this is an international issue. ICAN believes the Earth’s natural design should not be tampered with. Through legal action, it’s fighting to stop geoengineering on national and global levels. Unlike typical news outlets, ICAN uses supporter funds to sue the government and hold agencies like the EPA accountable, achieving victories in vaccines, food dyes, and now geoengineering.
5:52

The EPA has launched a probe into a California geoengineering company releasing SULFUR DIOXIDE into the atmosphere, thanks to relentless pressure from ICAN and its supporters. This is a major victory, but the fight to stop geoengineering continues. Here’s why this matters. ICAN has long raised concerns about geoengineering—efforts to manipulate the climate by polluting the skies. From chemtrails to stratospheric aerosol injection, the risks are undeniable: toxic substances like sulfur dioxide, an EPA-regulated pollutant, are being dispersed to “block the sun.” A private company, Make Sunsets, is launching balloons to release sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, selling “cooling credits” while endangering public health. Represented by Siri & Glimstad, ICAN sent two letters to the EPA, urging regulation of this activity under the Clean Air Act. Initially ignored, ICAN persisted, and EPA’s Joseph Kaufman finally responded, acknowledging that this is geoengineering. His letter referenced a 2022 White House research plan, which the EPA helped develop, but offered little action, despite admitting sulfur dioxide’s toxicity. Undeterred, ICAN intensified its efforts, fueled by public support. This week, EPA head Lee Zeldin announced an investigation into Make Sunsets, pledging to “get to the bottom of this and take immediate action.” This is a significant step, but the broader threat looms. Scientists, backed by figures like Bill Gates, plan to “brighten clouds” and dim sunlight within weeks. As the planet enters a solar minimum with reduced sunlight, blocking the sun could disrupt climate, agriculture, and health. Globally shared stratospheres mean this is an international issue. ICAN believes the Earth’s natural design should not be tampered with. Through legal action, it’s fighting to stop geoengineering on national and global levels. Unlike typical news outlets, ICAN uses supporter funds to sue the government and hold agencies like the EPA accountable, achieving victories in vaccines, food dyes, and now geoengineering.

Crescentia salus

20,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 RED ALERT: EPA Chief LEE ZELDIN Confirms Stratospheric CHEMICAL SPRAYING — “Sulfur Dioxide Into the Sky, Health Risks Are Real” (What used to be called “conspiracy” is now called official policy.) 💥 EPA Chief Lee Zeldin confirms that dangerous chemicals, including sulfur dioxide, are being released into the sky for geoengineering. Health risks are real. Environmental damage is guaranteed. This is no longer conspiracy — it’s official. Geoengineering Gone Rogue: The U.S. Government Has Funded It. The Skies Are Full of It. And Now the Truth Is Official. 🚨 THE CONFESSION THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO HEAR 👉 FULL STORY HERE: 📢 Join our Telegram channel: 🌐 Real stories. True journalism. Together, we make an impact:
2:57

🚨 RED ALERT: EPA Chief LEE ZELDIN Confirms Stratospheric CHEMICAL SPRAYING — “Sulfur Dioxide Into the Sky, Health Risks Are Real” (What used to be called “conspiracy” is now called official policy.) 💥 EPA Chief Lee Zeldin confirms that dangerous chemicals, including sulfur dioxide, are being released into the sky for geoengineering. Health risks are real. Environmental damage is guaranteed. This is no longer conspiracy — it’s official. Geoengineering Gone Rogue: The U.S. Government Has Funded It. The Skies Are Full of It. And Now the Truth Is Official. 🚨 THE CONFESSION THEY NEVER WANTED YOU TO HEAR 👉 FULL STORY HERE: 📢 Join our Telegram channel: 🌐 Real stories. True journalism. Together, we make an impact:

Medeea Greere

1,399,926 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: I had the opportunity to have an informal conversation with Trump. We talked about football, about the World Cup in the United States. It was an informal, casual conversation in which there was absolutely no tension whatsoever. On the contrary, there were only kind words and cordiality. The conversation took place after the press conference given by Trump.
0:36

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: I had the opportunity to have an informal conversation with Trump. We talked about football, about the World Cup in the United States. It was an informal, casual conversation in which there was absolutely no tension whatsoever. On the contrary, there were only kind words and cordiality. The conversation took place after the press conference given by Trump.

Clash Report

73,393 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Oracle & The British Government - FOI Investigations Since April 2025, I’ve been using the Freedom of Information Act to uncover what meetings, documents, and briefings exist between Oracle, the data and cloud giant led by Larry Ellison, and the UK Government. In this video, I walk through what has been disclosed, what has been delayed, and what remains hidden, including a previously undisclosed reference to an “Oracle Whitepaper” discussed with government ministers. Oracle underpins critical UK infrastructure, from healthcare and finance to government IT systems, yet operates largely out of public view. This investigation looks at Oracle’s role, Larry Ellison’s political and ideological influence, and why repeated FOI requests have been delayed or partially refused. This video is an experiment with a new setup and format, if it works, I’ll continue producing FOI-based investigations in this format. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 02:22 Who Oracle Is & Why It Matters 10:22 Oracle in UK Public Infrastructure 12:53 Larry Ellison and his controversies 25:00 UK Public Record Meetings in the UK 28:30 The FOI Submission and Response 31:55 Outro
33:51

Oracle & The British Government - FOI Investigations Since April 2025, I’ve been using the Freedom of Information Act to uncover what meetings, documents, and briefings exist between Oracle, the data and cloud giant led by Larry Ellison, and the UK Government. In this video, I walk through what has been disclosed, what has been delayed, and what remains hidden, including a previously undisclosed reference to an “Oracle Whitepaper” discussed with government ministers. Oracle underpins critical UK infrastructure, from healthcare and finance to government IT systems, yet operates largely out of public view. This investigation looks at Oracle’s role, Larry Ellison’s political and ideological influence, and why repeated FOI requests have been delayed or partially refused. This video is an experiment with a new setup and format, if it works, I’ll continue producing FOI-based investigations in this format. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 02:22 Who Oracle Is & Why It Matters 10:22 Oracle in UK Public Infrastructure 12:53 Larry Ellison and his controversies 25:00 UK Public Record Meetings in the UK 28:30 The FOI Submission and Response 31:55 Outro

Lewis Brackpool

20,270 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

At least three people are dead and over a dozen others are injured after an altercation led to a shooting at a large party Saturday in Stockton, Alabama. Local residents hosted a May Day event on Saturday that was attended by around 1,000 people, according to estimates from the Baldwin County Sheriff's Office. Witnesses told the sheriff's office that the gathering was peaceful until there was an argument, which led to at least one person shooting "multiple rounds" into the crowd. Stockton is located in southern Alabama, about 31 miles north of Mobile and 56 miles north of Gulf Shores. A total of 18 people were shot during the incident, and three have people died, the sheriff's office said. Police have not released the names of the people who died or the conditions of the others who were shot. In a release, the sheriff's office said it believes there may have been more than one shooter, and has brought in the Baldwin County Major Crimes Unit. Police have not named any current or potential suspects, and the investigation remains ongoing.
8:26

At least three people are dead and over a dozen others are injured after an altercation led to a shooting at a large party Saturday in Stockton, Alabama. Local residents hosted a May Day event on Saturday that was attended by around 1,000 people, according to estimates from the Baldwin County Sheriff's Office. Witnesses told the sheriff's office that the gathering was peaceful until there was an argument, which led to at least one person shooting "multiple rounds" into the crowd. Stockton is located in southern Alabama, about 31 miles north of Mobile and 56 miles north of Gulf Shores. A total of 18 people were shot during the incident, and three have people died, the sheriff's office said. Police have not released the names of the people who died or the conditions of the others who were shot. In a release, the sheriff's office said it believes there may have been more than one shooter, and has brought in the Baldwin County Major Crimes Unit. Police have not named any current or potential suspects, and the investigation remains ongoing.

Crime In NYC

31,939 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇮🇳An apology to all my readers, especially those from India Saturday, I was looking for videos of aircraft landing in the highest airports in the world. I googled for a video, found this on Reddit, from an Airport in Tibet, and shared it with the description. I should have been suspicious that reverse searches were not getting more videos of the place, and that the Reddit account from the post was from a deleted user. Anyway, this isn´t in Tibet, it´s in INDIA! This is actually Kushok Bakula Rimpochee Airport (VILH/IXL) in Leh, Ladakh. (On what could be salvaged from my goof, it is what I intended to show. The aircraft seen here is landing in one of the highest commercial airports in the world, sitting at over 10800 feet - over 3 kms up in the air!) I want to thank Captain The Joker for the help on this one, who also noted that only Captains are allowed to land here - it requires a special qualification to operate here Once again, sorry for my mistake, goods happen here and then, but this one was really far from the correct info (literally)
0:30

🇮🇳An apology to all my readers, especially those from India Saturday, I was looking for videos of aircraft landing in the highest airports in the world. I googled for a video, found this on Reddit, from an Airport in Tibet, and shared it with the description. I should have been suspicious that reverse searches were not getting more videos of the place, and that the Reddit account from the post was from a deleted user. Anyway, this isn´t in Tibet, it´s in INDIA! This is actually Kushok Bakula Rimpochee Airport (VILH/IXL) in Leh, Ladakh. (On what could be salvaged from my goof, it is what I intended to show. The aircraft seen here is landing in one of the highest commercial airports in the world, sitting at over 10800 feet - over 3 kms up in the air!) I want to thank Captain The Joker for the help on this one, who also noted that only Captains are allowed to land here - it requires a special qualification to operate here Once again, sorry for my mistake, goods happen here and then, but this one was really far from the correct info (literally)

Francisco Cunha

394,201 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Weather Manipulation Claims Are BACKED by Science “Yes, scientists do control the weather.” Over 50 countries, including the US, are using cloud seeding and geoengineering to change the weather. This has been proven true by numerous scientific studies, historical military operations, and active government programs. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense's Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War successfully used cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, while China's massive weather modification efforts have been publicly documented, with plans to control half the country's weather by 2025. Additionally, a U.S. federal agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), acknowledges the use of cloud seeding to increase precipitation. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also warned that The World Economic Forum and Bill Gates have “hijacked geoengineering,” with Gates funding these projects around the world. “They aggravate the problem then sell us the solution,” Kennedy said, and the solution is that “they want is more social controls.” “Geoengineering is a threat that the environmental community needs to know about and the rest of us needs to know about.” Take a moment to watch this video from and prepare to have your mind blown. (See More Revealing Stories Below)
11:25

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Weather Manipulation Claims Are BACKED by Science “Yes, scientists do control the weather.” Over 50 countries, including the US, are using cloud seeding and geoengineering to change the weather. This has been proven true by numerous scientific studies, historical military operations, and active government programs. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense's Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War successfully used cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, while China's massive weather modification efforts have been publicly documented, with plans to control half the country's weather by 2025. Additionally, a U.S. federal agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), acknowledges the use of cloud seeding to increase precipitation. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also warned that The World Economic Forum and Bill Gates have “hijacked geoengineering,” with Gates funding these projects around the world. “They aggravate the problem then sell us the solution,” Kennedy said, and the solution is that “they want is more social controls.” “Geoengineering is a threat that the environmental community needs to know about and the rest of us needs to know about.” Take a moment to watch this video from and prepare to have your mind blown. (See More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,481,798 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr