正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Here's why Roman Catholics are so easily deceived by counterfeit miracles. Their church requires them, from Code of Canon Law 752, to submit their intellect and will to the doctrines of the Roman Pontiff. They can't believe contrary to what the Church decrees. They also don't study the Bible...

35,316 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Rabbi Jason Sobel explains the term "Synagogue of Satan" "The early followers of Jesus all saw themselves as Jewish. It was seen as a sect of Judaism. That's why it was called the way before it was called Christians or Christianity" "Why is that important? Because in the ancient Roman in the ancient Roman Empire, everyone had to worship Caesar and offer sacrifices to Caesar and the Roman gods and to the idols unless they got an exemption to be an official religion of the Roman Empire, a legal religion" "And if you were not a legal religion, and you did not offer sacrifices to the Roman Empire, you could be persecuted and put to death. The first followers of Jesus were seen as under the umbrella of Judaism. Therefore, they didn't have to offer sacrifices to the Roman to the Roman gods" "These were gentile converts to Judaism that were persecuting the gentile Christians because they felt if they were going to claim to worship the God of Israel and claim to follow the Jewish scriptures and claim the Old Testament scriptures, they should convert and keep the law. And because they wouldn't do what they did, they wind up persecuting them as a result. And therefore they're called the synagogue of Satan" "Because synagogue isn't just a Jewish word. It just means a gathering number one. And and and Satan is the accuser. So these are accusing the church before the Roman authorities of breaking Roman law and therefore they're being persecuted as a result of it"

Seethroughitall

11,325 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is my facsimile copy of Codex Sinaiticus, the first few major codices like the original this is a photocopy of, are our very first versions of what we today would consider a Genesis to Revelation copy of the Bible. Codex Sinaiticus took upwards of nearly 400 sheep to make and would have cost the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s currency. By the 4th century when this was made, the perspective would have been that this contained the scripture more than that it was scripture. All of these major early codices operated as mini ancient libraries. And all of our earliest examples of them: whether that’s Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Washingtonianus, etc., have Christian books included within the contents of their covers that we today don’t consider scripture. So it is completely incorrect to claim that early church inclusion in a codex equates to scriptural reception. That’s just not true unless you’re willing to argue books like 4th Maccabees, The Shephered of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, and 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, that no church today accepts as scripture, should be included within your Bible. Likewise, the church recognizing books does not mean that their ability to do so gives them the authority. To say that the church gave us our Bible is like saying that the postal service gave you your mail. Your letter carrier is not the progenitor of the mail you receive. Those were written prior to, and even despite, your mail man or woman eventually getting them in your mailbox. The church is the servant and subsidiary of scripture, not the origin. This is why I’ve said in the past that the Bible made the church, the church didn’t make the Bible. Watch the full video: See John Meade’s talk on canon lists:

Wes Huff

61,298 次观看 • 1 年前