Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Here’s Why U.S. Elites Support Israel No Matter What : Explained by Ben Shapiro #GazaGenocide #GazaConcentrationCamp #IsraeliNewNazism #Israel #Hamas #ZionistsAreTerrorists (adaption of BreakThrough News video on the same topic)

10 Comments

Cleopatra's profile picture
Cleopatra2 years ago

@BenShapiro____ @BTnewsroom

Maria 🍉's profile picture
Maria 🍉2 years ago

@BTnewsroom Here’s Why US Elites Support Israel No Matter What :

Cleopatra's profile picture
Cleopatra2 years ago

@BenShapiro____ @BTnewsroom

nprwsh's profile picture
nprwsh2 years ago

@BTnewsroom

PacifitechScribe's profile picture
PacifitechScribe2 years ago

@BenShapiro____ @BTnewsroom Thank you so much for making this; it brought some laughter into a day otherwise filled with distressing news from Gaza.👍

Meera.أم بارود's profile picture
Meera.أم بارود2 years ago

@BenShapiro____ @BTnewsroom Maaan u are ugly that ugly itself disgusted by you 🤮

Leon F.A🇩🇿🇵🇸's profile picture
Leon F.A🇩🇿🇵🇸2 years ago

@BenShapiro____ @BTnewsroom I bet he does like swallow.

Three twi 🇵🇸's profile picture
Three twi 🇵🇸2 years ago

@BTnewsroom Daily liar 😭😭

JOJO's profile picture
JOJO2 years ago

@BTnewsroom This is AI

Ospark's profile picture
Ospark2 years ago

@BTnewsroom you got me there for a second

Related Videos

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?

Joel Mowbray

165,513 views • 7 months ago