Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Hey Blake Neff Curious if you wanted to answer a question today. It would be out of your norm, but let’s give it a shot. What was Blake Gibson putting inside the silver Palisade? You can see him closing the door and putting the key back in his pocket.... show more

KK

5,169 subscribers

35,068 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Q. If you had to point to one thing today that didn't get you the round that you wanted, what would it be? NELLY KORDA: What do you think? Q. Putting. NELLY KORDA: OK, thank you. Yeah, just left a few putts out there. Mm-hmm.

Q. If you had to point to one thing today that didn't get you the round that you wanted, what would it be? NELLY KORDA: What do you think? Q. Putting. NELLY KORDA: OK, thank you. Yeah, just left a few putts out there. Mm-hmm.

Beth Ann Nichols

86,963 views • 2 months ago

Watching this back from last night and what a moment Blake Treinen was at 37 pitches and had just put two on with one out Dave Roberts goes out to the mound to see if Treinen has it in his eyes He leaves him in... and Treinen gets outta the inning

Watching this back from last night and what a moment Blake Treinen was at 37 pitches and had just put two on with one out Dave Roberts goes out to the mound to see if Treinen has it in his eyes He leaves him in... and Treinen gets outta the inning

Blake Harris

1,059,637 views • 1 year ago

Wanted to give it a bit for people to find on their own, but if you were curious what "Dark Teemo" does in The Climb, they gave him access to a certain iconic super...

Wanted to give it a bit for people to find on their own, but if you were curious what "Dark Teemo" does in The Climb, they gave him access to a certain iconic super...

ONi | Nitten 🔜 CEO 26

66,070 views • 3 months ago

👤 would you be able to go back to your early debut days? 🐰 if i had to go back to my trainee days, i’d still give it a shot and debut in txt again but! if you ask me “would you go back or would you not?” i would absolutely not go back 😅

👤 would you be able to go back to your early debut days? 🐰 if i had to go back to my trainee days, i’d still give it a shot and debut in txt again but! if you ask me “would you go back or would you not?” i would absolutely not go back 😅

💬

90,090 views • 5 months ago

Ladies, if you were getting married, and your husband to be walked down the aisle in a shimmering tuxedo with his back out, what would you do?

Ladies, if you were getting married, and your husband to be walked down the aisle in a shimmering tuxedo with his back out, what would you do?

Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸

352,585 views • 1 year ago

WTF???!!! This is insane! NBC made Lindsay Clancy juror Kellie Farina re-answer a question - but they left her initial response in the video! This is at the 32:08 mark in the interview, watch: Interviewer: "Do you think that she should be re-tried?" Farina: "I would like to see her be re-tried, absolutely." Then the interviewer looks off screen and gestures to someone. Was that a signal to edit that part out because they didn't like her answer? Then she stumbles through asking the EXACT same question! Interviewer: "You think, you think, you would like she should be re- re-tried?" Then they cut to another camera shot for Farina to re-answer the question. Farina: "I would like him NOT to re-try her." What is this? They didn't even edit out Farina's initial answer which was that she WOULD like Lindsay to be re-tried! In the span of 10 seconds, you can watch Farina basically say "yes" and "no" to literally the same question. How can we believe anything these jurors say? If a juror answers a question in a way the media doesn't like they make them re-do the question with a different answer? How many other times has this happened? Fake. News. What a disgrace... Link to the interview:

WTF???!!! This is insane! NBC made Lindsay Clancy juror Kellie Farina re-answer a question - but they left her initial response in the video! This is at the 32:08 mark in the interview, watch: Interviewer: "Do you think that she should be re-tried?" Farina: "I would like to see her be re-tried, absolutely." Then the interviewer looks off screen and gestures to someone. Was that a signal to edit that part out because they didn't like her answer? Then she stumbles through asking the EXACT same question! Interviewer: "You think, you think, you would like she should be re- re-tried?" Then they cut to another camera shot for Farina to re-answer the question. Farina: "I would like him NOT to re-try her." What is this? They didn't even edit out Farina's initial answer which was that she WOULD like Lindsay to be re-tried! In the span of 10 seconds, you can watch Farina basically say "yes" and "no" to literally the same question. How can we believe anything these jurors say? If a juror answers a question in a way the media doesn't like they make them re-do the question with a different answer? How many other times has this happened? Fake. News. What a disgrace... Link to the interview:

Umm Imagine

1,185,942 views • 10 days ago

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,916 views • 3 months ago

Take a moment tonight to ask yourself: What would you stop doing if you weren’t afraid? What truth would you tell if you trusted your own voice? Don’t answer these question with your mind. Answer it with your body. Because your body will tell you the truth. Then take these answers, and let them be your compass. Let them lead you forward. Let them lead you through the confusion, the uncertainty, the fear. Because deep in your heart and mind, you know what to do. Keep going! #sundayeveningreminder

Take a moment tonight to ask yourself: What would you stop doing if you weren’t afraid? What truth would you tell if you trusted your own voice? Don’t answer these question with your mind. Answer it with your body. Because your body will tell you the truth. Then take these answers, and let them be your compass. Let them lead you forward. Let them lead you through the confusion, the uncertainty, the fear. Because deep in your heart and mind, you know what to do. Keep going! #sundayeveningreminder

Maria Shriver

18,521 views • 8 months ago

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens reveals NEW high-definition photos of inside SUV that took Charlie Kirk "to the hospital" when he was assassinated 👀 - You can see what appears to be broken black glass/plastic on the floor. - There's a clearer image what appears to be a burnt remnant of Charlie's shirt. - There's also an image of what appears to be a rubber glove in the vehicle passenger side door. WHAT HAPPENED after Charlie Kirk was carried off away from UVU?! 🤔

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens reveals NEW high-definition photos of inside SUV that took Charlie Kirk "to the hospital" when he was assassinated 👀 - You can see what appears to be broken black glass/plastic on the floor. - There's a clearer image what appears to be a burnt remnant of Charlie's shirt. - There's also an image of what appears to be a rubber glove in the vehicle passenger side door. WHAT HAPPENED after Charlie Kirk was carried off away from UVU?! 🤔

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

70,444 views • 2 months ago

There’s something about Final Jeopardy with Gunther Eagleman™ hosting… one question tied to the foundation of this country, nothing extra. Just you and what you know. Let’s see it—answer in the replies.

There’s something about Final Jeopardy with Gunther Eagleman™ hosting… one question tied to the foundation of this country, nothing extra. Just you and what you know. Let’s see it—answer in the replies.

Restricted Daily

57,088 views • 5 months ago

What if the night before getting assassinated, Charlie Kirk had posted to Twitter "They're trying to kill me," instead of simply texting & telling it to people in private? How much disbelief & mockery would he have been met with? Remember that as you mock Candace Owens for doing what probably would have saved Charlie's life. And especially remember it given that today is the anniversary of the assassination of JFK. You think they'd blink twice at taking Candace out?

What if the night before getting assassinated, Charlie Kirk had posted to Twitter "They're trying to kill me," instead of simply texting & telling it to people in private? How much disbelief & mockery would he have been met with? Remember that as you mock Candace Owens for doing what probably would have saved Charlie's life. And especially remember it given that today is the anniversary of the assassination of JFK. You think they'd blink twice at taking Candace out?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

314,932 views • 10 months ago

Think you’ve got the diagnosis? Think again!! This is a case where the diagnosis is not as important as the lesson it teaches you. Watch the video and then check back for hidden portion of this post to see what the answer is... And what lesson you should have learned from it ! Avidly enhancing T2 dark lesions in the subependymal region with increased diffusion signal. If I said that description to you—even without seeing the images—you would say lymphoma! Was that your answer? It was mine! And we are both wrong! It turned out to be metastatic melanoma. But the lesson here is that just because you were wrong by pathology, doesn’t mean you were wrong on the imaging If I saw a case like this again, I would still say lymphoma! You won’t be right every time—there will be weird cases. But you are making a bet on the imaging appearance and you should always bet the odds—with the risk that every now and then you might be wrong! So don’t remember from this case that metastases can look like lymphoma—remember that sometimes it’s ok to be wrong as long as you read the case right

Think you’ve got the diagnosis? Think again!! This is a case where the diagnosis is not as important as the lesson it teaches you. Watch the video and then check back for hidden portion of this post to see what the answer is... And what lesson you should have learned from it ! Avidly enhancing T2 dark lesions in the subependymal region with increased diffusion signal. If I said that description to you—even without seeing the images—you would say lymphoma! Was that your answer? It was mine! And we are both wrong! It turned out to be metastatic melanoma. But the lesson here is that just because you were wrong by pathology, doesn’t mean you were wrong on the imaging If I saw a case like this again, I would still say lymphoma! You won’t be right every time—there will be weird cases. But you are making a bet on the imaging appearance and you should always bet the odds—with the risk that every now and then you might be wrong! So don’t remember from this case that metastases can look like lymphoma—remember that sometimes it’s ok to be wrong as long as you read the case right

Lea Alhilali, MD

12,351 views • 2 years ago

I didn't quite understand what I was seeing at the time - but - this is the door opening and you can see the atmosphere blowing out, the narrow strip of illumination made it look a bit like the surface of water.

I didn't quite understand what I was seeing at the time - but - this is the door opening and you can see the atmosphere blowing out, the narrow strip of illumination made it look a bit like the surface of water.

Scott Manley

485,409 views • 2 years ago