Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hey Cardano! A few updates from Leios and MusashiNet: 🌏 Eerth phase just concluded. 6x mainnet throughput without even trying. Read the blog post here: 💰MusashiNet rewards program is live. It's tied to data sharing eg machine logs, forging logs, machine specs, relay location. Read more here: 📘 Leios...

carloslodelar's profile picture

Carlos Lopez de Lara

2,175 subscribers

40,928 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The real reason behind Cardano’s Leios upgrade is actually an economic puzzle. 🧩 It isn't just about speed, it's about solving a long-term sustainability problem. As ADA reserves decrease over time, transaction volume needs to step up to fund staking rewards for users and SPOs. Leios allows Cardano to safely scale to provide that capacity without losing the determinism we hold near and dear. Even the early stages of this rollout will support a few thousand TPS, giving the network massive headroom to exceed the 50 TPS needed to be fully self-sustaining. Watch the video below to understand the big picture 👇
1:36

The real reason behind Cardano’s Leios upgrade is actually an economic puzzle. 🧩 It isn't just about speed, it's about solving a long-term sustainability problem. As ADA reserves decrease over time, transaction volume needs to step up to fund staking rewards for users and SPOs. Leios allows Cardano to safely scale to provide that capacity without losing the determinism we hold near and dear. Even the early stages of this rollout will support a few thousand TPS, giving the network massive headroom to exceed the 50 TPS needed to be fully self-sustaining. Watch the video below to understand the big picture 👇

Sundae Labs 🍨

24,102 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚀 Venom Set to Upgrade Mainnet with 150K TPS Protocol 🚀 Venom is on the verge of a huge upgrade! The Venom Foundation has been hard at work trying to refine and improve the network and the results have the potential to elevate Venom above all of its blockchain peers. 🌐 ⚡ After rigorous testing, the Venom network is about to be upgraded with a new protocol, enabling it to complete 150K TPS. This would make Venom one of the blockchain's with the highest throughput in existence. 📅 The upgrade is set to take place in Q3 2025. 🔗 For more details, read the latest press release here: 🎥 Check out this video of our throughput test in real-time 👇
20:06

🚀 Venom Set to Upgrade Mainnet with 150K TPS Protocol 🚀 Venom is on the verge of a huge upgrade! The Venom Foundation has been hard at work trying to refine and improve the network and the results have the potential to elevate Venom above all of its blockchain peers. 🌐 ⚡ After rigorous testing, the Venom network is about to be upgraded with a new protocol, enabling it to complete 150K TPS. This would make Venom one of the blockchain's with the highest throughput in existence. 📅 The upgrade is set to take place in Q3 2025. 🔗 For more details, read the latest press release here: 🎥 Check out this video of our throughput test in real-time 👇

Venom Foundation

12,391 просмотров • 1 год назад

We are thrilled to announce the official launch of the first-ever decentralized digital marketing agency on Cardano!! We are convinced that the Cardano ecosystem represents the future of managing identity, assets, and governance. To make this vision a reality, individuals, private businesses, and governments need to understand and embrace Cardano.🤝 At Cardano Curation, our mission is to create, curate, and distribute engaging and informative content that highlights the Cardano ecosystem.🗣️ Our objective is to attract 10,000 new followers and achieve 1 million views across all our social media platforms by the end of 2024.📈 Do you believe in our vision and wish to be a part of our journey? You can invest in our agency starting at just ₳10. Read more about our Revenue-Sharing Program below.💰 🧵👇
1:03

We are thrilled to announce the official launch of the first-ever decentralized digital marketing agency on Cardano!! We are convinced that the Cardano ecosystem represents the future of managing identity, assets, and governance. To make this vision a reality, individuals, private businesses, and governments need to understand and embrace Cardano.🤝 At Cardano Curation, our mission is to create, curate, and distribute engaging and informative content that highlights the Cardano ecosystem.🗣️ Our objective is to attract 10,000 new followers and achieve 1 million views across all our social media platforms by the end of 2024.📈 Do you believe in our vision and wish to be a part of our journey? You can invest in our agency starting at just ₳10. Read more about our Revenue-Sharing Program below.💰 🧵👇

Cardano Curation

54,215 просмотров • 2 лет назад

There is a committee of three judges investigating the matter, but investigation is domain of the Executive. Investigation is not the domain of Judiciary. Is the committee under the Constitution of India? No. Is this committee of three judges having any sanction under any law emanating from Parliament ? No. A committee can at most make a recommendation. The kind of mechanism we have for judges, the only action that can be taken is by the Parliament. A month has passed. An investigation requires speed, expedition and preservation of incriminating material. As a citizen of the country and holding position which I do, I am concerned. Are we not diluting rule of law? Are we not answerable to 'We the People' who gave us the Constitution? I would strongly urge everyone concerned to examine this as a test case. What legitimacy and jurisdictional authority does this committee possess? Can we have separate law made by a category and the law made by that category, dehors Constitution, dehors Parliament? The committee report, according to me, inherently lacks legal standing. #RajyaSabha
2:16

There is a committee of three judges investigating the matter, but investigation is domain of the Executive. Investigation is not the domain of Judiciary. Is the committee under the Constitution of India? No. Is this committee of three judges having any sanction under any law emanating from Parliament ? No. A committee can at most make a recommendation. The kind of mechanism we have for judges, the only action that can be taken is by the Parliament. A month has passed. An investigation requires speed, expedition and preservation of incriminating material. As a citizen of the country and holding position which I do, I am concerned. Are we not diluting rule of law? Are we not answerable to 'We the People' who gave us the Constitution? I would strongly urge everyone concerned to examine this as a test case. What legitimacy and jurisdictional authority does this committee possess? Can we have separate law made by a category and the law made by that category, dehors Constitution, dehors Parliament? The committee report, according to me, inherently lacks legal standing. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

497,281 просмотров • 1 год назад

🛠️ Cardano Community builders - this one’s for you! Apply for the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator here: 10 weeks. Hands-on. Founder-focused. Built to help Cardano-native startups go from potential to proof. The CV Labs Cardano Accelerator is the next step in your entrepreneurial journey, and we couldn't be more excited to be your guide! Here’s what to expect from the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator: ⚡ A two week bootcamp kickoff with expert-led sessions with industry leaders and Cardano OGs 🌍 Exposure to CV Labs’ global ecosystem 🚀 1:1 support from our diverse mentor network in product development, traction, fundraising, tokenomics, and more! 🏁 Pitch training to be investor-ready for Demo Day Whether your an existing Cardano builder or looking to build on one the leading global protocols, the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator is where the magic happens 👉 Join the next wave of Cardano innovators and before April 19th: Cardano Community_CF Cardano Community
0:52

🛠️ Cardano Community builders - this one’s for you! Apply for the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator here: 10 weeks. Hands-on. Founder-focused. Built to help Cardano-native startups go from potential to proof. The CV Labs Cardano Accelerator is the next step in your entrepreneurial journey, and we couldn't be more excited to be your guide! Here’s what to expect from the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator: ⚡ A two week bootcamp kickoff with expert-led sessions with industry leaders and Cardano OGs 🌍 Exposure to CV Labs’ global ecosystem 🚀 1:1 support from our diverse mentor network in product development, traction, fundraising, tokenomics, and more! 🏁 Pitch training to be investor-ready for Demo Day Whether your an existing Cardano builder or looking to build on one the leading global protocols, the CV Labs Cardano Accelerator is where the magic happens 👉 Join the next wave of Cardano innovators and before April 19th: Cardano Community_CF Cardano Community

CV Labs

25,821 просмотров • 1 год назад

[WATCH] IMPEACHMENT COMMITTEE CHAIR. If Mmusi wants to chair the committee he must put his ambitions forward and not create his own rules. There is no rule that says the ANC is excluded from putting forth a candidate to chair the committee. We are not going into the impeachment process to defend, we are going into it guided by the ruling of the constitutional court and follow all matters step by step as expected of us. Even in the Ad Hoc Committee we have acted without fear or favour, even against our own. Maimane must not create rules that are non existent and he has ambitions to chair the committee and we will not support it. We have had an Ad Hoc Committee chair by Cde Soviet who is an ANC member, it was fair and he was unbiased even against his fellow members who appeared. So this allegation that the ANC will defend its President is unfounded and the example of the Ad hoc Committee proves that. The ANC like any other party in parliament is not excluded from chairing. #TheYearOfDecisiveAction
5:20

[WATCH] IMPEACHMENT COMMITTEE CHAIR. If Mmusi wants to chair the committee he must put his ambitions forward and not create his own rules. There is no rule that says the ANC is excluded from putting forth a candidate to chair the committee. We are not going into the impeachment process to defend, we are going into it guided by the ruling of the constitutional court and follow all matters step by step as expected of us. Even in the Ad Hoc Committee we have acted without fear or favour, even against our own. Maimane must not create rules that are non existent and he has ambitions to chair the committee and we will not support it. We have had an Ad Hoc Committee chair by Cde Soviet who is an ANC member, it was fair and he was unbiased even against his fellow members who appeared. So this allegation that the ANC will defend its President is unfounded and the example of the Ad hoc Committee proves that. The ANC like any other party in parliament is not excluded from chairing. #TheYearOfDecisiveAction

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

66,077 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WOAH 🚨 Texas Rep Brian Harrison says the Texas State Speaker of the House just appointed DEMOCRATS ON THE TEXAS REDISTRICTING COMMITTEE TO SABOTAGE DONALD TRUMP “Our RINO speaker appoints him to a newly formed select committee on what? Redistricting. And then even since I learned that, 2 more quotes I'll give you from 2 other radical Democrats that he put on the redistricting committee. This is Trump's plan for redistricting. He puts these Democrats who said the following things just today, one by Representative Turner, he says, quote, we will do all we can to fight back against Donald Trump. And then get this, he actually made a Democrat the co chairman of the redistricting committee. Let me read you two sentences from the newly appointed Democrat co chair of the redistricting committee. Quote, Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans want to prioritize going after congressional districts by stealing them while ignoring the people's voices. Serving as vice chair of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting is a responsibility I take seriously because the stakes couldn't be higher. I'm ready to fight back against President Trump. That is the Democrat newly appointed co chairman of the region Redistricting Committee here in the great state of Texas. It is an absolute betrayal of the conservative Republican Trump supporting voters here in the state of Texas.”
5:34

WOAH 🚨 Texas Rep Brian Harrison says the Texas State Speaker of the House just appointed DEMOCRATS ON THE TEXAS REDISTRICTING COMMITTEE TO SABOTAGE DONALD TRUMP “Our RINO speaker appoints him to a newly formed select committee on what? Redistricting. And then even since I learned that, 2 more quotes I'll give you from 2 other radical Democrats that he put on the redistricting committee. This is Trump's plan for redistricting. He puts these Democrats who said the following things just today, one by Representative Turner, he says, quote, we will do all we can to fight back against Donald Trump. And then get this, he actually made a Democrat the co chairman of the redistricting committee. Let me read you two sentences from the newly appointed Democrat co chair of the redistricting committee. Quote, Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans want to prioritize going after congressional districts by stealing them while ignoring the people's voices. Serving as vice chair of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting is a responsibility I take seriously because the stakes couldn't be higher. I'm ready to fight back against President Trump. That is the Democrat newly appointed co chairman of the region Redistricting Committee here in the great state of Texas. It is an absolute betrayal of the conservative Republican Trump supporting voters here in the state of Texas.”

Wall Street Apes

112,969 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.
5:49

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Cardano Constitutional Convention wasn't just about creating a document. It was about creating a constitution anchored by a shared global vision. 🌐 As highlighted by Charles Hoskinson, each representative carried their nation’s voice, and it's crucial that the Cardano Blockchain Ecosystem Constitution has global reach and is translated into many languages. The Constitution’s true impact will be fully realized when it's carried back home and understood in every language. This is no small task, but it’s the work necessary to promote further global dialogue, collaboration and adoption of the Constitution. Watch the full video here:
1:15

The Cardano Constitutional Convention wasn't just about creating a document. It was about creating a constitution anchored by a shared global vision. 🌐 As highlighted by Charles Hoskinson, each representative carried their nation’s voice, and it's crucial that the Cardano Blockchain Ecosystem Constitution has global reach and is translated into many languages. The Constitution’s true impact will be fully realized when it's carried back home and understood in every language. This is no small task, but it’s the work necessary to promote further global dialogue, collaboration and adoption of the Constitution. Watch the full video here:

Input Output Group

20,944 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.
4:38

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.

The SCIF

140,595 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Full Statement from Kirk Family Representative, Jeffrey Neiman, on Day 4 of the Preliminary hearing pushing for the full public transparency of the Lance Twiggs interview recording: "We appreciate the court is trying to balance here, but the Kirk family's waited 10 months for this hearing. And they have a right to be here and they have a right to hear the evidence. They have a right to see and feel what's going on in this courtroom, just like— and they want to understand, Judge, what you are— what you were viewing." "They want to see the evidence." "And we understand you have to balance, but at a minimum, this courtroom needs to be open for the, for the evidence to be displayed openly in this courtroom, for them to see it. The Utah Constitution gives them the right to be here, and to be here and not to see the evidence, what's the point of being here? We ask you to let the evidence be seen in the courtroom, please. Thank you for your time."
0:52

Full Statement from Kirk Family Representative, Jeffrey Neiman, on Day 4 of the Preliminary hearing pushing for the full public transparency of the Lance Twiggs interview recording: "We appreciate the court is trying to balance here, but the Kirk family's waited 10 months for this hearing. And they have a right to be here and they have a right to hear the evidence. They have a right to see and feel what's going on in this courtroom, just like— and they want to understand, Judge, what you are— what you were viewing." "They want to see the evidence." "And we understand you have to balance, but at a minimum, this courtroom needs to be open for the, for the evidence to be displayed openly in this courtroom, for them to see it. The Utah Constitution gives them the right to be here, and to be here and not to see the evidence, what's the point of being here? We ask you to let the evidence be seen in the courtroom, please. Thank you for your time."

Andrew Kolvet

137,877 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

WATCH: Democrat Disharmony Highlight Reel | CNN's Scott Jennings requested a compilation showcasing Democrats in disarray—from the absurd Musk protests to the latest DNC meeting debacle. Here it is. Scott Jennings; "I think the highlight reel that you just played spliced with the highlight reel of all the people trying to run the Democratic National Committee at their organizational meeting, ought to be put together, and we ought to take money from the Republican National Committee and play it on a loop." "Ladies and gentlemen, the American left is so far off the rails, they're going to have to get Google maps to find their way back." "They are WAY gone right now." "And it's glorious."
2:40

WATCH: Democrat Disharmony Highlight Reel | CNN's Scott Jennings requested a compilation showcasing Democrats in disarray—from the absurd Musk protests to the latest DNC meeting debacle. Here it is. Scott Jennings; "I think the highlight reel that you just played spliced with the highlight reel of all the people trying to run the Democratic National Committee at their organizational meeting, ought to be put together, and we ought to take money from the Republican National Committee and play it on a loop." "Ladies and gentlemen, the American left is so far off the rails, they're going to have to get Google maps to find their way back." "They are WAY gone right now." "And it's glorious."

Overton

196,821 просмотров • 1 год назад

“If you’re buying a horse for $100,000 and you don’t want to spend $200 for aftercare, get the hell out of the game. You shouldn’t be here.” Is what Mike Repole of Repole Stables said to The Ron Flatter Racing Pod this week expressing his passion for an aftercare program he and Pat Cummings are aiming to launch early in September this year. Share an emoji in the comments below if you support a cohesive aftercare plan for our athletes! To hear more about their plan, listen to the podcast with the link here:
0:41

“If you’re buying a horse for $100,000 and you don’t want to spend $200 for aftercare, get the hell out of the game. You shouldn’t be here.” Is what Mike Repole of Repole Stables said to The Ron Flatter Racing Pod this week expressing his passion for an aftercare program he and Pat Cummings are aiming to launch early in September this year. Share an emoji in the comments below if you support a cohesive aftercare plan for our athletes! To hear more about their plan, listen to the podcast with the link here:

LightUpRacing

42,030 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.
0:55

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.

TheNewsHawks

17,671 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.
6:58

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,431 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Here is part 1 of the animated short movie we made for Cardano! Read this tweet until the end & follow the instructions if you want a chance to win 500 $ADA 😉 Over the course of 5 chapters (to be released once a week over the next 4-5 weeks), we tell the story of the Cardano road map (a parodied version) from the "perspective" of Charles Hoskinson - at a certain point in Chapter one, we poked fun at how Charles viewed Emurgo & the Cardano Foundation. While this was always done strictly in jest, we feel the need to point out that the efforts of the founding entities are valued & we're happy to see the renewed spirit of collaboration among them to push the ecosystem forward 🫡 Seeing as its thanks giving for many, I feel the following challenge is appropriate, RT & reply to this video with one thing you are grateful for since joining the Cardano Community - one lucky winner will get 500 ADA! Enjoy the show, good luck with the challenge & happy thanks giving! 🍻 Long Live Cardano!
3:07

Here is part 1 of the animated short movie we made for Cardano! Read this tweet until the end & follow the instructions if you want a chance to win 500 $ADA 😉 Over the course of 5 chapters (to be released once a week over the next 4-5 weeks), we tell the story of the Cardano road map (a parodied version) from the "perspective" of Charles Hoskinson - at a certain point in Chapter one, we poked fun at how Charles viewed Emurgo & the Cardano Foundation. While this was always done strictly in jest, we feel the need to point out that the efforts of the founding entities are valued & we're happy to see the renewed spirit of collaboration among them to push the ecosystem forward 🫡 Seeing as its thanks giving for many, I feel the following challenge is appropriate, RT & reply to this video with one thing you are grateful for since joining the Cardano Community - one lucky winner will get 500 ADA! Enjoy the show, good luck with the challenge & happy thanks giving! 🍻 Long Live Cardano!

Tipsy Turtles

17,444 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад