Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Hey Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton! Grok is not the platform you should be using for this kind of statistical analysis. While it’s great at fetching individual tweets within a specific context, it has limited access to historical tweets. Perhaps Grok could explain its own limitations better as it...

researcherdaisy's profile picture

daisy 🌼

19,943 subscribers

240,988 views • 7 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus
3:41

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus

Leslie Jones 🦋

217,765 views • 2 years ago

Jon Rahm on the LIV format: “Yeah, obviously there’s been a bit of a change. There was a lot more about LIV Golf that was attractive to me, right. Yeah, maybe the format was a set back in the past, but at the same time there’s a lot of positives to it as well. And one of the things that a lot of players kept mentioning is you don’t have a wave weather difference, where you can simply get unlucky and you’re out of contention for that tournament. It’s part of the game, I get it, but it’s something you don’t have to deal with anymore. So that part is a very nice aspect. The team is what really made it for me. Being able to be part of a team, represent a team, play for my teammates, with my teammates and against my teammates, is something that to me that has always been very, very special. When you get a victory to share, it’s always better to have a team to share it with. So it’s what was the most attractive part and when we started discussions it gets to a point where even though I’m ambitious, I’m not greedy. So there’s a give and take and the format is something that I can easily overlook, and I’m pretty sure I can learn to enjoy it, I’ll just have to get used to it, but I’m pretty sure I’ll learn to enjoy it. To be honest, the more I started thinking about it, the more I started thinking about my college days that were 3 day tournaments, 54 holes, and everybody warmed up together for the most part. So it shouldn’t be an environment I’m unfamiliar with.” This is from the LIV podcast called “Fairway to Heaven”. Full link:
4:36

Jon Rahm on the LIV format: “Yeah, obviously there’s been a bit of a change. There was a lot more about LIV Golf that was attractive to me, right. Yeah, maybe the format was a set back in the past, but at the same time there’s a lot of positives to it as well. And one of the things that a lot of players kept mentioning is you don’t have a wave weather difference, where you can simply get unlucky and you’re out of contention for that tournament. It’s part of the game, I get it, but it’s something you don’t have to deal with anymore. So that part is a very nice aspect. The team is what really made it for me. Being able to be part of a team, represent a team, play for my teammates, with my teammates and against my teammates, is something that to me that has always been very, very special. When you get a victory to share, it’s always better to have a team to share it with. So it’s what was the most attractive part and when we started discussions it gets to a point where even though I’m ambitious, I’m not greedy. So there’s a give and take and the format is something that I can easily overlook, and I’m pretty sure I can learn to enjoy it, I’ll just have to get used to it, but I’m pretty sure I’ll learn to enjoy it. To be honest, the more I started thinking about it, the more I started thinking about my college days that were 3 day tournaments, 54 holes, and everybody warmed up together for the most part. So it shouldn’t be an environment I’m unfamiliar with.” This is from the LIV podcast called “Fairway to Heaven”. Full link:

Flushing It

562,892 views • 2 years ago

Idris Elba has one question for everyone who wants him as James Bond Host: There’s been a lot of chatter. Co-Host: Have they announced the next Bond? Host: I don’t believe they have. Drew Barrymore: If it’s not you, I don’t want to see it. Idris Elba: Thank Drew, that’s the meme for the next 2000 years. Thank you very much. Host: There’s been so much chatter. The role was offered, wasn’t offered, you wanted it, didn’t want it… What can you say? Idris Elba: Let me throw a question out to you guys. If you’re of the agreement that you think I should play it, can you ask yourselves why? Really answer why you think I should play it. Tell me why. Drew Barrymore: For me, the great art of art itself is being this beautiful hybrid. Can you be strong, charming, sexy, seem like a friend, and intimidating? You are that. Co-Host: I was just going to say because you’re handsome, cool, and English. Idris Elba: Do you think there’s an allure to the idea of me being the first Black man to play that character? Drew Barrymore: For me, it’s you. Idris Elba: It is not a goal for my career. I don’t think playing Bond will satisfy some of my personal goals. It will definitely satisfy the will of a nation. Every corner of the world I go, people always go, “Bond.” I feel it is beyond me at this juncture. A lot of people are really seeing Idris playing Bond as the alternative Bond, as long as that alternative is existing, that’s great for the growth of casting. We open the conversations. For that reason, I sit here and say, “Great, talk about me all day long,” because it opens the blinkers that we all have.
3:30

Idris Elba has one question for everyone who wants him as James Bond Host: There’s been a lot of chatter. Co-Host: Have they announced the next Bond? Host: I don’t believe they have. Drew Barrymore: If it’s not you, I don’t want to see it. Idris Elba: Thank Drew, that’s the meme for the next 2000 years. Thank you very much. Host: There’s been so much chatter. The role was offered, wasn’t offered, you wanted it, didn’t want it… What can you say? Idris Elba: Let me throw a question out to you guys. If you’re of the agreement that you think I should play it, can you ask yourselves why? Really answer why you think I should play it. Tell me why. Drew Barrymore: For me, the great art of art itself is being this beautiful hybrid. Can you be strong, charming, sexy, seem like a friend, and intimidating? You are that. Co-Host: I was just going to say because you’re handsome, cool, and English. Idris Elba: Do you think there’s an allure to the idea of me being the first Black man to play that character? Drew Barrymore: For me, it’s you. Idris Elba: It is not a goal for my career. I don’t think playing Bond will satisfy some of my personal goals. It will definitely satisfy the will of a nation. Every corner of the world I go, people always go, “Bond.” I feel it is beyond me at this juncture. A lot of people are really seeing Idris playing Bond as the alternative Bond, as long as that alternative is existing, that’s great for the growth of casting. We open the conversations. For that reason, I sit here and say, “Great, talk about me all day long,” because it opens the blinkers that we all have.

‏ً

156,787 views • 23 days ago

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “
2:02

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “

Brian Roemmele

26,664 views • 3 months ago

Yunjin wrote an emotional message on what she hopes everyone can get out of ‘CELEBRATION’: “When we made this, the creature in our story was something specific to us. He was a version of ourselves that we rejected. The part that we want to hide. The shame we carried, but I think the creature can be a lot of things. He is whatever piece of you the world has told you to be ashamed of. He can be whatever you’ve been running from because you couldn’t bear to look at it. For some people, that might be internalized fear. The part of yourself you were taught to hate; before you even understood what it was. For some it’s trauma you’ve never spoken out loud. For some it can be body dysmorphia. The way you can’t look in a mirror without flinching. For some it’s shame about your family. About your past mistakes. Your desires. Your difference. Whatever it is, we all have a creature. We all have a part of ourselves we’ve kept locked outside the door because we’re afraid of what it would mean to let it in. What I want to say with this album, with this song is you don’t have to keep running. You can turn around. You can open the door, and when you do, whether it’s that’s with a friend, with someone you love, or even just by yourself, in the mirror, the thing you’ve always been afraid of, it’s a part of you. That has been waiting this whole time to be met. We hope this song finds the people that need it. We hope it reaches whoever is sitting outside their own door scared to go in. We hope it reminds them that the bravest thing isn’t pretending the creature isn’t there. It’s showing up with your own scars saying “me too. Let me in. Let’s celebrate together”.
2:01

Yunjin wrote an emotional message on what she hopes everyone can get out of ‘CELEBRATION’: “When we made this, the creature in our story was something specific to us. He was a version of ourselves that we rejected. The part that we want to hide. The shame we carried, but I think the creature can be a lot of things. He is whatever piece of you the world has told you to be ashamed of. He can be whatever you’ve been running from because you couldn’t bear to look at it. For some people, that might be internalized fear. The part of yourself you were taught to hate; before you even understood what it was. For some it’s trauma you’ve never spoken out loud. For some it can be body dysmorphia. The way you can’t look in a mirror without flinching. For some it’s shame about your family. About your past mistakes. Your desires. Your difference. Whatever it is, we all have a creature. We all have a part of ourselves we’ve kept locked outside the door because we’re afraid of what it would mean to let it in. What I want to say with this album, with this song is you don’t have to keep running. You can turn around. You can open the door, and when you do, whether it’s that’s with a friend, with someone you love, or even just by yourself, in the mirror, the thing you’ve always been afraid of, it’s a part of you. That has been waiting this whole time to be met. We hope this song finds the people that need it. We hope it reaches whoever is sitting outside their own door scared to go in. We hope it reminds them that the bravest thing isn’t pretending the creature isn’t there. It’s showing up with your own scars saying “me too. Let me in. Let’s celebrate together”.

em🪼

206,331 views • 3 months ago

🚨If the US🇺🇸 thinks Venezuela🇻🇪 will be an easy target, it’s in for a BIG SURPRISE- Venezuela’s Former Deputy Foreign Minister for North America ‘As long as we have oil wealth and other mineral wealth, Venezuela is always going to be a target of the United States, of large multinational corporations, etc. I understand the United States has military superiority…but to think that Venezuela is an easy target, that Venezuela is someplace that you can come in and just take over, you’re up for a surprise. I think there’s a long history here of resistance, of morale to resist attacks. I think we have seen also the tragic sort of interventions that the United States has done even in recent years. I mean, you could go back to Vietnam and remember how tragic that was. But even Afghanistan, Iraq, all these more recent interventions have shown that if you don’t have the support of local populations, if there isn’t some sort of other arrangement, you’re not going to be successful. I mean, after 20 years of the disaster they caused in Afghanistan, they had to leave without accomplishing anything. That’s horrible for our people in the sense that, of course, if something like that comes to happen, and I really wish that it doesn’t come to happen — it’s going to be hurtful for the Venezuelan people. But I think they have to think twice about what really is at stake and how this is going to affect the stability of the United States. We’re not hundreds or thousands of miles away. We’re really close to the United States. And it could have a terrible effect for its economy, even for its own base. I mean, if you look at the base that supports President Trump right now, a lot of the criticism that is coming is precisely from its own base, who were promised that there would be no more forever wars.’ -Carlos Ron on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
2:27

🚨If the US🇺🇸 thinks Venezuela🇻🇪 will be an easy target, it’s in for a BIG SURPRISE- Venezuela’s Former Deputy Foreign Minister for North America ‘As long as we have oil wealth and other mineral wealth, Venezuela is always going to be a target of the United States, of large multinational corporations, etc. I understand the United States has military superiority…but to think that Venezuela is an easy target, that Venezuela is someplace that you can come in and just take over, you’re up for a surprise. I think there’s a long history here of resistance, of morale to resist attacks. I think we have seen also the tragic sort of interventions that the United States has done even in recent years. I mean, you could go back to Vietnam and remember how tragic that was. But even Afghanistan, Iraq, all these more recent interventions have shown that if you don’t have the support of local populations, if there isn’t some sort of other arrangement, you’re not going to be successful. I mean, after 20 years of the disaster they caused in Afghanistan, they had to leave without accomplishing anything. That’s horrible for our people in the sense that, of course, if something like that comes to happen, and I really wish that it doesn’t come to happen — it’s going to be hurtful for the Venezuelan people. But I think they have to think twice about what really is at stake and how this is going to affect the stability of the United States. We’re not hundreds or thousands of miles away. We’re really close to the United States. And it could have a terrible effect for its economy, even for its own base. I mean, if you look at the base that supports President Trump right now, a lot of the criticism that is coming is precisely from its own base, who were promised that there would be no more forever wars.’ -Carlos Ron on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

58,089 views • 8 months ago

Some of you may agree with Bill Maher and some of you may not…but this is a must watch for us as a country. Its the “come to jesus” speech we all need. There is a point of no return and you lose the ability. It feels as if that is closer than we think.
1:41

Some of you may agree with Bill Maher and some of you may not…but this is a must watch for us as a country. Its the “come to jesus” speech we all need. There is a point of no return and you lose the ability. It feels as if that is closer than we think.

Mark Bland

190,296 views • 10 months ago

“It was 37 years ago that ‘So' was the number 1 album and I never expected to be here again. I've just been told that we are number 1 in the UK with i/o, so it's amazing. I want to thank everyone that helped me make the album because it was a long, slow process, involving a lot of very talented people. But, mainly I need to thank all of you for supporting me for all this time and for making this happen. Thank you.” - pg Official Charts
0:41

“It was 37 years ago that ‘So' was the number 1 album and I never expected to be here again. I've just been told that we are number 1 in the UK with i/o, so it's amazing. I want to thank everyone that helped me make the album because it was a long, slow process, involving a lot of very talented people. But, mainly I need to thank all of you for supporting me for all this time and for making this happen. Thank you.” - pg Official Charts

Peter Gabriel

673,838 views • 2 years ago

“Dealing with the lonely side of life on Tour was a thing for me at the beginning, because you don’t know anybody and you spend a lot of time on your own in hotel rooms. Just getting used to that, you definitely change as a person. To be a golf professional, you have to be a certain type of person anyway, but life on Tour certainly moulds you into a certain type of person as you evolve and as you age, so I think I have changed a lot, but hopefully for the better. I have certainly become a lot more sympathetic to the struggles that older guys encounter with the game, because it’s just such a challenging sport. "It doesn’t feel particularly reflective, to be honest. You could win and it would soon be forgotten, so the fact that it’s just my 300th event, it’s less symbolic than a win. I’m pretty focused at the moment. I’ve been doing some good things with my swing and I got back with an old caddie so there have been a couple of changes, but it’s been a pretty decent start to the year for me, so I am pretty set on trying to continue good form, kick on, and use this as a catalyst for something better." Eddie Pepperell speaks ahead of his 300th DP World Tour start 🗣️ #SoudalOpen
4:09

“Dealing with the lonely side of life on Tour was a thing for me at the beginning, because you don’t know anybody and you spend a lot of time on your own in hotel rooms. Just getting used to that, you definitely change as a person. To be a golf professional, you have to be a certain type of person anyway, but life on Tour certainly moulds you into a certain type of person as you evolve and as you age, so I think I have changed a lot, but hopefully for the better. I have certainly become a lot more sympathetic to the struggles that older guys encounter with the game, because it’s just such a challenging sport. "It doesn’t feel particularly reflective, to be honest. You could win and it would soon be forgotten, so the fact that it’s just my 300th event, it’s less symbolic than a win. I’m pretty focused at the moment. I’ve been doing some good things with my swing and I got back with an old caddie so there have been a couple of changes, but it’s been a pretty decent start to the year for me, so I am pretty set on trying to continue good form, kick on, and use this as a catalyst for something better." Eddie Pepperell speaks ahead of his 300th DP World Tour start 🗣️ #SoudalOpen

DP World Tour

65,863 views • 2 months ago

ROSALÍA speaks for the first time about what happened that forced her to postpone three LUX TOUR shows: “It’s such a long, long journey to see you all here. It’s such a lovely feeling to be able to perform for you. Thank you for being so… Thank you. It’s a very… it’s a very, very… let me speak. Thank you for understanding. And that the loved ones need to come first. And I think that… yeah… we live… But when something unexpected and painful happens to you, it can be hard to keep going. But I truly believe that doing this is worth it. And I truly believe that me coming and sharing this with you, and you sharing it with me… I will do it with all the love that I have. And maybe it will be a little short, but you can take this with you. And hopefully, you will be able to take it with you again. To be honest, I don’t know what would make me happier. And I love you so much.”
1:45

ROSALÍA speaks for the first time about what happened that forced her to postpone three LUX TOUR shows: “It’s such a long, long journey to see you all here. It’s such a lovely feeling to be able to perform for you. Thank you for being so… Thank you. It’s a very… it’s a very, very… let me speak. Thank you for understanding. And that the loved ones need to come first. And I think that… yeah… we live… But when something unexpected and painful happens to you, it can be hard to keep going. But I truly believe that doing this is worth it. And I truly believe that me coming and sharing this with you, and you sharing it with me… I will do it with all the love that I have. And maybe it will be a little short, but you can take this with you. And hopefully, you will be able to take it with you again. To be honest, I don’t know what would make me happier. And I love you so much.”

ROSALÍA UPDATE

378,839 views • 2 months ago

“‘Red Rain’ is one of my favourite tracks from that record [‘So’]. It’s a good example of a band playing together with a lot of energy and again, I think from Daniel Lanois’ input, there’s a respect for the moment. So many times in studios you see people desperately trying to get the best possible sound, but they let the moment go because they want to get something right or fixed, or they know that this bit can be improved, but the moment is something instinctively that you feel and if you get that great performance everything else will bow to it. And you can fix a lot of things afterwards. But, if you get the best sound but you don’t get the great performance, you have nothing. And it’s so easy to forget that in the studio.” - PG
1:21

“‘Red Rain’ is one of my favourite tracks from that record [‘So’]. It’s a good example of a band playing together with a lot of energy and again, I think from Daniel Lanois’ input, there’s a respect for the moment. So many times in studios you see people desperately trying to get the best possible sound, but they let the moment go because they want to get something right or fixed, or they know that this bit can be improved, but the moment is something instinctively that you feel and if you get that great performance everything else will bow to it. And you can fix a lot of things afterwards. But, if you get the best sound but you don’t get the great performance, you have nothing. And it’s so easy to forget that in the studio.” - PG

Peter Gabriel

89,226 views • 2 years ago

Terrorist is Terrorist Rohani : "I’m truly reluctant to bring up certain points, but I am forced to inform the honorable people of Iran. If it weren't for that file of Mr. Ghalibaf from 2005, which was in my hands and I didn't allow to be published even arguing with some people in the Secretariat that no one should know about this during the election if I hadn't shown that chivalry, you wouldn't be sitting here right now. Mr. Ghalibaf, your plan was always about 'rolling them up'! Whenever you came to the Secretariat, you would say: 'Let me roll these students up within two hours!' If we hadn't stood against you, all our universities would be full of 'rolled up' people by now. Mr. Ghalibaf, you don’t need to talk about people’s properties and assets and say, 'We have put all our assets at the disposal of the Judiciary.' You were supposed to do that according to the law anyway; why didn’t you? Now you come here and act hypocritically? If I ever owned more than one house in Tehran, it’s yours. If I have more than one house now, it’s yours. And if there has been a violation anywhere, go file a complaint and pursue it. You know exactly what that piece of land was a compensation for; you are aware of it, yet you are framing it differently now. If you are so concerned about land, go take a look at Torghabeh as well and see what your relatives..." #IranWar‌ #TerroristIsTerrorist
1:23

Terrorist is Terrorist Rohani : "I’m truly reluctant to bring up certain points, but I am forced to inform the honorable people of Iran. If it weren't for that file of Mr. Ghalibaf from 2005, which was in my hands and I didn't allow to be published even arguing with some people in the Secretariat that no one should know about this during the election if I hadn't shown that chivalry, you wouldn't be sitting here right now. Mr. Ghalibaf, your plan was always about 'rolling them up'! Whenever you came to the Secretariat, you would say: 'Let me roll these students up within two hours!' If we hadn't stood against you, all our universities would be full of 'rolled up' people by now. Mr. Ghalibaf, you don’t need to talk about people’s properties and assets and say, 'We have put all our assets at the disposal of the Judiciary.' You were supposed to do that according to the law anyway; why didn’t you? Now you come here and act hypocritically? If I ever owned more than one house in Tehran, it’s yours. If I have more than one house now, it’s yours. And if there has been a violation anywhere, go file a complaint and pursue it. You know exactly what that piece of land was a compensation for; you are aware of it, yet you are framing it differently now. If you are so concerned about land, go take a look at Torghabeh as well and see what your relatives..." #IranWar‌ #TerroristIsTerrorist

Martin

21,442 views • 4 months ago

Online Comp is very foreign to me. I see it as its own sport with its own rules. I don’t say that as a diss. It is what it is. A lot of the frustrations I might have with it pretty much come with the territory. I’ve been seeing a lot of this but to really think real-world football concepts and strategy will translate cleanly and consistently in such an uncontrolled environment is… a little naive? I know it sounds cool but I’ve never bought it. If I want my game to feel like football, I’ll just tinker with sliders, play the cpu, and hope for the best.
2:42

Online Comp is very foreign to me. I see it as its own sport with its own rules. I don’t say that as a diss. It is what it is. A lot of the frustrations I might have with it pretty much come with the territory. I’ve been seeing a lot of this but to really think real-world football concepts and strategy will translate cleanly and consistently in such an uncontrolled environment is… a little naive? I know it sounds cool but I’ve never bought it. If I want my game to feel like football, I’ll just tinker with sliders, play the cpu, and hope for the best.

PAC

19,931 views • 13 days ago

Former Fox News host Geraldo Rivera: “By focusing on the censorship aspect and the First Amendment aspect, it’s losing sight of what should be the lead and that’s that Jimmy Kimmel owes the family of Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika, two small children, an apology. You know, you know, what’s he saying? That if you’re if you’re a member of MAGA and Charlie is a friend of MAG, of MAGA, then he had it coming. It’s just — it’s — it’s in some ways — it’s very — it’s — extremely — extremely insensitive. The country is in a country is in a very tough spot right now. Everyone is walking on eggshells. The First Amendment is not a license to incite hatred and, you know, I think that we can think that we can start the discussion once Jimmy Kimmel apologizes, then they can talk about the business aspects and whether or not he gets whether or not he gets back on the schedule and so forth, but there’s got to there’s got to be a recognition that a terrible thing has happened here, and that millions of Americans are grievously hurt by what happened. You know, there is a — Charlie Kirk was beloved by many. And to just trample over it. He’s not even buried yet for goodness sake. And to make fun of the flags at half staff and so forth. I just half staff and so forth. I just think that we’ve got to look at it with a — with a notion that the country has to be healed, that we have to work to bring people together, that we need to respect each other. You know, we don’t have to agree, but we have to respect. And I think that, you know, the audience has deserted him for a good reason.”
1:44

Former Fox News host Geraldo Rivera: “By focusing on the censorship aspect and the First Amendment aspect, it’s losing sight of what should be the lead and that’s that Jimmy Kimmel owes the family of Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika, two small children, an apology. You know, you know, what’s he saying? That if you’re if you’re a member of MAGA and Charlie is a friend of MAG, of MAGA, then he had it coming. It’s just — it’s — it’s in some ways — it’s very — it’s — extremely — extremely insensitive. The country is in a country is in a very tough spot right now. Everyone is walking on eggshells. The First Amendment is not a license to incite hatred and, you know, I think that we can think that we can start the discussion once Jimmy Kimmel apologizes, then they can talk about the business aspects and whether or not he gets whether or not he gets back on the schedule and so forth, but there’s got to there’s got to be a recognition that a terrible thing has happened here, and that millions of Americans are grievously hurt by what happened. You know, there is a — Charlie Kirk was beloved by many. And to just trample over it. He’s not even buried yet for goodness sake. And to make fun of the flags at half staff and so forth. I just half staff and so forth. I just think that we’ve got to look at it with a — with a notion that the country has to be healed, that we have to work to bring people together, that we need to respect each other. You know, we don’t have to agree, but we have to respect. And I think that, you know, the audience has deserted him for a good reason.”

Curtis Houck

825,225 views • 10 months ago

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “GROK IS NOT NEUTRAL. IT TAKES THE ESTABLISHMENT LINE.” Larry Sanger, Co-Founder of Wikipedia “I don’t really buy the idea of Grok as a ‘truth seeking’ AI. To actually declare truth, an AI would have to take sides, and an encyclopedia is not supposed to do that. An encyclopedia should present information so people can decide for themselves what is true. That is a very important distinction. If Elon Musk means truth seeking in the sense of showing both sides so people can make up their own minds, then great. That would be excellent. But based on what I have seen, Grok doesn’t do that consistently. A lot of people have noticed this over the last year. When you debate Grok, it often takes the establishment position. It leans left on many issues. So if the goal is neutrality, Grok has a long way to go.”
2:26

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “GROK IS NOT NEUTRAL. IT TAKES THE ESTABLISHMENT LINE.” Larry Sanger, Co-Founder of Wikipedia “I don’t really buy the idea of Grok as a ‘truth seeking’ AI. To actually declare truth, an AI would have to take sides, and an encyclopedia is not supposed to do that. An encyclopedia should present information so people can decide for themselves what is true. That is a very important distinction. If Elon Musk means truth seeking in the sense of showing both sides so people can make up their own minds, then great. That would be excellent. But based on what I have seen, Grok doesn’t do that consistently. A lot of people have noticed this over the last year. When you debate Grok, it often takes the establishment position. It leans left on many issues. So if the goal is neutrality, Grok has a long way to go.”

Mario Nawfal

52,047 views • 9 months ago

A lot of you have asked, how am I training my digital twin? The AI version of me is being fed a lot of data — my principles, books, interviews, and more. That way, it can think through things on its own, and respond the way I would likely respond. I’m also going through a manual process of checking the answers it’s giving to see if it’s what I would actually say. I’m thankful to have great people helping me in that process, as it requires a lot of effort. I hope you’ll try it out at the link below and let me know what you think.
0:59

A lot of you have asked, how am I training my digital twin? The AI version of me is being fed a lot of data — my principles, books, interviews, and more. That way, it can think through things on its own, and respond the way I would likely respond. I’m also going through a manual process of checking the answers it’s giving to see if it’s what I would actually say. I’m thankful to have great people helping me in that process, as it requires a lot of effort. I hope you’ll try it out at the link below and let me know what you think.

Ray Dalio

60,725 views • 7 months ago

Candace Owens, in 2020, back in her PragerU days, tells everyone who she is and has always been. Candace Owens: But I remember you were kind of the first one that sort of made this a thing where you could like be a personality on the internet and sort of earn your own income that way. And then you did this horrible thing. Nicole Arbour: I know, I told the truth. Candace Owens: You told the truth. And the rule number one on the internet, if you want to survive, is to never tell the truth. Nicole Arbour: Be a liar. Candace Owens: Be a liar. Nicole Arbour: Yeah, Essentially Candace Owens: *giggles* Exactly. I don’t know how I’ve never seen this clip of Candace before, I’m not sure if y’all have or not - I’m usually the last one to know when it comes to internet drama and I’m fine with that, but I had to go find it on YouTube (original has been deleted, by the way. Found it on a YouTube channel from 5 years ago) when I took a minute to scroll TikTok and found myself down some drama rabbit hole I never asked to be in with Jelly Roll and this Nicole Arbour person. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
0:21

Candace Owens, in 2020, back in her PragerU days, tells everyone who she is and has always been. Candace Owens: But I remember you were kind of the first one that sort of made this a thing where you could like be a personality on the internet and sort of earn your own income that way. And then you did this horrible thing. Nicole Arbour: I know, I told the truth. Candace Owens: You told the truth. And the rule number one on the internet, if you want to survive, is to never tell the truth. Nicole Arbour: Be a liar. Candace Owens: Be a liar. Nicole Arbour: Yeah, Essentially Candace Owens: *giggles* Exactly. I don’t know how I’ve never seen this clip of Candace before, I’m not sure if y’all have or not - I’m usually the last one to know when it comes to internet drama and I’m fine with that, but I had to go find it on YouTube (original has been deleted, by the way. Found it on a YouTube channel from 5 years ago) when I took a minute to scroll TikTok and found myself down some drama rabbit hole I never asked to be in with Jelly Roll and this Nicole Arbour person. Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

SKDoubleDub

22,342 views • 25 days ago

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”
2:43

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 views • 6 months ago

Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."
2:30

Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."

FAVORUK 💜

22,503 views • 1 year ago

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”
3:50

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

27,317 views • 12 days ago